News

Team Trump wasted no time as it ventures to reshape the RNC in Trump’s image.

On its very first day in control of the Republican National Committee following last week’s takeover, Team Trump wasted no time as it ventures to reshape the RNC in Trump’s image — immediately bringing the axe down on more than 60 of the organization’s 200-some staffers. Vendors are also bracing for possible terminations of their RNC relationships. 

“[The new leadership is] in the process of evaluating the organization and staff to ensure the building is aligned” with its vision, said new RNC chief operating officer Sean Cairncross in an email to staff. 

Among those whose career blood is splattered on the walls of RNC headquarters are five senior staffers, including the leaders of the political, communications and data teams. Some employees are being asked to resign but with an opportunity to reapply for their jobs. “If you choose to not reapply, your last day of employment will be March 31,” wrote Cairncross. In a possible indication of the new leadership’s urgency to reorganize the party, Cairncross’s own name was misspelled on his email.  

Last week, RNC members voted to put Trump’s endorsed candidates in command. North Carolina GOP chair Michael Whatley is now the RNC chairman, Trump daughter-in-law Lara Trump is co-chair and Trump senior campaign adviser Chris LaCivita is the chief operations officer.  

The RNC renovation isn’t just about achieving Trumpist purity — it’s also aimed at cost-cutting: 

Trump advisers have described the RNC’s structure as overly bloated and bureaucratic, which they believe has contributed to the party’s cash woes. The RNC had about $8 million at the end of December, only about one-third as much as the Democratic National Committee. – Politico

The new organization will consolidate some functions — such as fundraising, communications and data — into a single department. The finance and digital teams are likely to move to Palm Beach, where Trump’s reelection campaign is headquartered, an insider tells the New York Times. 

Lara Trump told Fox News the RNC will focus on three pillars to ensure a winning November: “Turn out the vote, protect the vote, and raise money, but I would argue that maybe the most important of those three is protecting the vote; election integrity.” 

The RNC has already established an election integrity division, she said, and will augment it with a nationwide network of volunteers, to include poll-watchers, poll-workers and lawyers, adding, “We can never allow what happened in 2020 and the questions surrounding that election to ever happen again.”

---

---

“The so-called TikTok ban is a trojan horse,” says Rep. Thomas Massie.

Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) has raised the alarm that the new bill ostensibly designed to ban the Chinese-owned social media app TikTok also gives the president the power to ban entire websites.

“The so-called TikTok ban is a trojan horse” said Massie Tuesday. “The President will be given the power to ban WEB SITES, not just Apps.”

“The person breaking the new law is deemed to be the U.S. (or offshore) INTERNET HOSTING SERVICE or App Store, not the ‘foreign adversary.’”

Massie then focused on a specific exclusion in the bill.

If you think this isn’t a Trojan horse and will only apply to TikTok and foreign-adversary social media companies, then contemplate why someone thought it was important to get a very specific exclusion for their internet based business written into the bill: pic.twitter.com/LnHsmEgtt9

— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) March 12, 2024

Similarly, X boss Elon Musk echoed Massie’s sentiment by saying the new law enables government censorship.

Earlier this week, former President Donald Trump also came out against the ban on TikTok by saying the move would empower Facebook, whom he considers “an enemy of the people.”

“Without TikTok, you can make Facebook bigger,” said Trump to CNBC Monday. “And I consider Facebook to be an enemy of the people, along with a lot of the media.”

Massie has a track record of calling out government overreach.

In November, Massie also raised the alarm of a failed effort to stop a federal mandate that would require all vehicles sold after 2026 to be equipped with a kill switch.

---

Watch: Democratic Leaders Tell America That Illegal Aliens Come First

---

As the masses wake up to the globalist agenda, they plan to burn it all down

Many people still don’t realize just how dire the situation truly is.

Led by a deeply treasonous intelligence apparatus, a compromised dementia-riddled lunatic hijacked the Executive Office of the United States of America. His Marxist communist sympathizing base is following every handbook of sabotage to the letter to quicken the demise of the city upon the hill. They are burning it all down by any means necessary.

Also:

---

Democrat House Rep. defends Biden after Special Counsel report called puppet president “an elderly man with a poor memory.”

Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) took issue with Special Counsel Robert Hur during testimony Tuesday, criticizing the federal investigator’s characterization of Joe Biden in his report as an elderly man with memory problems.

“You could have chosen just a comment on the president’s particular recall, vis-à-vis a document or a set of documents, but you decided to go further and make a generalized statement about his memory, didn’t you?” Schiff pressed Hur during House Judiciary Committee testimony.

“Congressman, I could have written my report theoretically in a way that omitted references to the president’s memory, but that would have been an incomplete and improper report,” Hur responded.

Unsatisfied with his answer, Schiff continued to claim Hur intended to denigrate and politically damage Biden with his report, in which he described Biden as an “elderly man with a poor memory” with “significant limitations.”

“You could have written your report with comments about his specific recollection as to documents or a set of documents, but you chose a general pejorative reference to the president,” Schiff said. “You understood when you made that decision didn’t you, Mr. Hur, that you would ignite a political firestorm with that language didn’t you?”

Hur replied that politics “played no part whatsoever” in his investigation, however Schiff continued, “You cannot tell me you’re so naive as to to think your words would not have created a political firestorm.”

“You understood that didn’t you when you wrote those words when you decided to include those words?” Schiff asked.

Hur answered that he followed policy and submitted his report to Attorney General Merrick Garland, who he understood would have oversight over what parts of the report to release publicly.

“It was up to the Attorney General to determine what portions of the report would be released consistent with DOJ policy and legal requirements,” Hur told Schiff.

Schiff went on to claim Hur’s report was inconsistent with DOJ policy “that you are to take care not to prejudice the interests of the subject of an investigation,” and continued to insist Hur must have known the political damage his report would have caused Biden.

In his report into Biden’s retention of classified materials released in February, Hur wrote, “Mr. Biden’s memory also appeared to have significant limitations – both at the time he spoke to Zwonitzer in 2017, as evidenced by their recorded conversations, and today, as evidenced by his recorded interview with our office.”

He also wrote his conversations with Biden were “painfully slow” and that he was “struggling to remember events and straining at times to read and relay his own notebook entries.”

“In his interview with our office, Mr. Biden’s memory was worse,” Hur’s report stated. “He did not remember when he was vice president, forgetting on the first day of the interview when his term ended (‘if it was 2013 – when did I stop being Vice President?’), and forgetting on the second day of the interview when his term began (‘in 2009, am I still Vice President?‘).”

The special counsel also wrote he believed a jury would likely be too sympathetic to Biden because he’s “an elderly man with a poor memory.“

“Based on our direct interactions with and observations of him [Biden], he is someone for whom many jurors will want to identify reasonable doubt. It would be difficult to convince a jury that they should convict him – by then a former president will into his eighties – of a serious felony that requires a mental state of willfulness,” Hur wrote.

---

The globalists are increasing their attacks on Infowars and the stakes have never been higher!

Please consider donating and visit InfowarsStore.com for merch, nutraceuticals and survival gear.

---

Follow the author on X, Facebook, Gab, Minds, Truth Social and Gettr.

---

---

“You exonerated him,” Jayapal insists.

Democrat Rep. Pramila Jayapal (Wash.) gaslighted the American public during Congressional testimony of Special Counsel Robert Hur on Tuesday, insisting that he “exonerated” Joe Biden in his report detailing the former vice president’s retention of classified materials.

During Hur’s testimony before the House Judiciary Committee, Jayapal proclaimed that Hur’s report released last month “exonerated” Biden.

Hur pushed back however, claiming he did not, in fact, exonerate Biden at all, prompting Jayapal to cut him off and again assert he did exonerate Biden.

“I need to go back and make sure that I take note of the word that you used, ‘exoneration’, that is not a word that was in the report–” Hur began.

Rep. Jayapal: “You exonerated [Biden]”

Hur: “I did not exonerate him”

Rep. Jayapal: ““Sir, it’s my time. Thank you.” pic.twitter.com/q6w5Cq2vnG

• Our fan-favorite Turbo Force Plus is now 40% off! See for yourself the delicious one-of-a-kind energy boost infowarriors CRAVE!

— Greg Price (@greg_price11) March 12, 2024

“I’m gonna continue with my questions,” Jayapal interrupted before asserting, “You exonerated him.”

Hur responded: “I did not exonerate him…”

“Mr. Hur, it’s my time!” Jayapal snapped. She then resumed trying to argue that Biden is cleared of any wrongdoing.

But the facts, as Hur explained, found that Biden was guilty of wrongdoing, in that he “willfully retained” classified materials after serving as vice president.

“We identified evidence that the President willfully retained classified materials after the end of his vice presidency, when he was a private citizen,” Hur said during the hearing.

Special counsel Robert Hur: “My team and I conducted a thorough, independent investigation. We identified evidence that the president willfully retained classified materials after the end of his vice presidency when he was a private citizen.” pic.twitter.com/ms018Ar2xS

— Trump War Room (@TrumpWarRoom) March 12, 2024

Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) sought clarification, asking Hur if Biden lied when he told the American people that he did not share classified materials with a ghostwriter.

“That is inconsistent with the findings based on the evidence in my report,” Hur replied.

“So it’s a lie, is what regular people would say. Is that right?” Gaetz asked.

“Yeah,” Hur said with a chuckle.

Special Counsel Robert Hur admits Biden was, in fact, LYING when he insisted he did not share classified information with his ghostwriter pic.twitter.com/K5qctTB4K4

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) March 12, 2024

To make matters worse for Biden, Hur confirmed that the ghostwriter who received classified materials from Biden was not authorized to receive them.

Former Special Counsel Robert Hur: “We have an audio recording capturing a statement from Mr. Biden saying to his ghostwriter in February 2017: ‘I just found all the classified stuff downstairs’…

…Mr. Zwonitzer was not authorized to receive classified information.” pic.twitter.com/JSEdakIYh6

— MAGA War Room (@MAGAIncWarRoom) March 12, 2024

In sum, Hur’s report concluded that Biden willfully retained classified materials after serving as vice president and shared them with unauthorized individuals, but ultimately did not recommend charges, citing Biden as “elderly” and “forgetful” with “diminished faculties” which he claimed would garner sympathy from a jury.

Watch the full House Judiciary Committee hearing:

---

Follow Jamie White on X | Truth | Gab | Gettr | Minds

These are dangerous times. Yet while the presidential candidates talk at length about the dangers posed by the opposition party, the U.S. government still poses the gravest threat to our freedoms and way of life.

“Never has our future been more unpredictable, never have we depended so much on political forces that cannot be trusted to follow the rules of common sense and self-interest—forces that look like sheer insanity, if judged by the standards of other centuries.”—Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism

Day by day, tyranny is rising as freedom falls.

The U.S. military is being used to patrol subway stations and police the U.S.-Mexico border, supposedly in the name of national security.

The financial sector is being used to carry out broad surveillance of Americans’ private financial data, while the entertainment sector is being tapped to inform on video game enthusiasts with a penchant for violent, potentially extremist content, all in an alleged effort to uncover individuals subscribing to anti-government sentiments

Public and private venues are being equipped with sophisticated surveillance technologies, including biometric and facial recognition software, to track Americans wherever they go and whatever they do. Space satellites with powerful overhead surveillance cameras will render privacy null and void.

This is the state of our nation that no is talking about—not the politicians, not the courts, and not Congress: the government’s power grabs are growing bolder, while the rights of the citizenry continue to be trampled underfoot.

Hitler is hiding in the shadows, while the citizenry—the only ones powerful enough to stem the authoritarian tide that threatens to lay siege to our constitutional republic—remain easily distracted and conveniently diverted by political theatrics and news cycles that change every few days.

This sorry truth has persisted no matter which party has controlled Congress or the White House.  

These are dangerous times.

Yet while the presidential candidates talk at length about the dangers posed by the opposition party, the U.S. government still poses the gravest threat to our freedoms and way of life.

Police shootings of unarmed individuals, invasive surveillance, roadside blood draws, roadside strip searches, SWAT team raids gone awry, the military industrial complex’s costly wars, pork barrel spending, pre-crime laws, civil asset forfeiture, fusion centers, militarization, armed drones, smart policing carried out by AI robots, courts that march in lockstep with the police state, schools that function as indoctrination centers, bureaucrats that keep the Deep State in power: these are just a few of the ways in which the police state continues to flex its muscles in a show of force intended to intimidate anyone still clinging to the antiquated notion that the government answers to “we the people.”

Consider for yourself the state of our nation:

Americans have little protection against police abuse. The police and other government agents have been generally empowered to probe, poke, pinch, taser, search, seize, strip and generally manhandle anyone they see fit in almost any circumstance, all with the general blessing of the courts. It is no longer unusual to hear about incidents in which police shoot unarmed individuals first and ask questions later. What is increasingly common, however, is the news that the officers involved in these incidents get off with little more than a slap on the hands.

Americans are little more than pocketbooks to fund the police state. If there is any absolute maxim by which the federal government seems to operate, it is that the American taxpayer always gets ripped off. This is true, whether you’re talking about taxpayers being forced to fund high-priced weaponry that will be used against us, endless wars that do little for our safety or our freedoms, or bloated government agencies with their secret budgets, covert agendas and clandestine activities.

Americans are no longer innocent until proven guilty. We once operated under the assumption that you were innocent until proven guilty. Due in large part to rapid advances in technology and a heightened surveillance culture, the burden of proof has been shifted so that the right to be considered innocent until proven guilty has been usurped by a new norm in which all citizens are suspects. Indeed, the government—in cahoots with the corporate state—has erected the ultimate suspect society. In such an environment, we are all potentially guilty of some wrongdoing or other.

Americans no longer have a right to self-defense. While the courts continue to disagree over the exact nature of the rights protected by the Second Amendment, the government itself has made its position extremely clear. When it comes to gun rights in particular, and the rights of the citizenry overall, the U.S. government has adopted a “do what I say, not what I do” mindset. Nowhere is this double standard more evident than in the government’s attempts to arm itself to the teeth, all the while viewing as suspect anyone who dares to legally own a gun, let alone use one in self-defense. Indeed, while it still technically remains legal to own a firearm in America, possessing one can now get you pulled over, searched, arrested, subjected to all manner of surveillance, treated as a suspect without ever having committed a crime, shot at, and killed.

Americans no longer have a right to private property. If government agents can invade your home, break down your doors, kill your dog, damage your furnishings and terrorize your family, your property is no longer private and secure—it belongs to the government. Likewise, if government officials can fine and arrest you for growing vegetables in your front yard, praying with friends in your living room, installing solar panels on your roof, and raising chickens in your backyard, you’re no longer the owner of your property.

Americans no longer have a say about what their children are exposed to in school. Incredibly, the government continues to insist that parents essentially forfeit their rights when they send their children to a public school. This growing tension over whether young people, especially those in the public schools, are essentially wards of the state, to do with as government officials deem appropriate, in defiance of the children’s constitutional rights and those of their parents, is at the heart of almost every debate over educational programming, school discipline, and the extent to which parents have any say over their children’s wellbeing in and out of school.

Americans are powerless in the face of militarized police forces. With local police agencies acquiring military-grade weaponry, training and equipment better suited for the battlefield, Americans are finding their once-peaceful communities transformed into military outposts patrolled by a standing military army.

Americans no longer have a right to bodily integrity. The debate over bodily integrity covers broad territory, ranging from abortion and euthanasia to forced blood draws, biometric surveillance and basic healthcare. Forced vaccinations, forced cavity searches, forced colonoscopies, forced blood draws, forced breath-alcohol tests, forced DNA extractions, forced eye scans, forced inclusion in biometric databases: these are just a few ways in which Americans continue to be reminded that we have no control over what happens to our bodies during an encounter with government officials.

Americans no longer have a right to the expectation of privacy. Despite the staggering number of revelations about government spying on Americans’ phone calls, Facebook posts, Twitter tweets, Google searches, emails, bookstore and grocery purchases, bank statements, commuter toll records, etc., Congress, the president and the courts have done little to nothing to counteract these abuses. Instead, they seem determined to accustom us to life in this electronic concentration camp.

Americans no longer have a representative government. We have moved beyond the era of representative government and entered the age of authoritarianism, where all citizens are suspects, security trumps freedom, and so-called elected officials represent the interests of the corporate power elite. This topsy-turvy travesty of law and government has become America’s new normal.

Americans can no longer rely on the courts to mete out justice. The U.S. Supreme Court was intended to be an institution established to intervene and protect the people against the government and its agents when they overstep their bounds. Yet through their deference to police power, preference for security over freedom, and evisceration of our most basic rights for the sake of order and expediency, the justices of the Supreme Court have become the architects of the American police state in which we now live, while the lower courts have appointed themselves courts of order, concerned primarily with advancing the government’s agenda, no matter how unjust or illegal.

I haven’t even touched on the corporate state, the military industrial complex, SWAT team raids, invasive surveillance technology, zero tolerance policies in the schools, overcriminalization, or privatized prisons, to name just a few, but what I have touched on should be enough to show that the landscape of our freedoms has already changed dramatically from what it once was and will no doubt continue to deteriorate unless Americans can find a way to wrest back control of their government and reclaim their freedoms.

This steady slide towards tyranny, meted out by militarized local and federal police and legalistic bureaucrats, has been carried forward by each successive president over the past seventy-plus years regardless of their political affiliation.

The more things change, the more they stay the same.

We are walking a dangerous path right now.

Having allowed the government to expand and exceed our reach, we find ourselves on the losing end of a tug-of-war over control of our country and our lives. And for as long as we let them, government officials will continue to trample on our rights, always justifying their actions as being for the good of the people.

Yet the government can only go as far as “we the people” allow. Therein lies the problem.

The pickle we find ourselves in speaks volumes about the nature of the government beast we have been saddled with and how it views the rights and sovereignty of “we the people.”

Now you don’t hear a lot about sovereignty anymore. Sovereignty is a dusty, antiquated term that harkens back to an age when kings and emperors ruled with absolute power over a populace that had no rights. Americans turned the idea of sovereignty on its head when they declared their independence from Great Britain and rejected the absolute authority of King George III. In doing so, Americans claimed for themselves the right to self-government and established themselves as the ultimate authority and power.

In other words, in America, “we the people”— sovereign citizens—call the shots.

So when the government acts, it is supposed to do so at our bidding and on our behalf, because we are the rulers.

That’s not exactly how it turned out, though, is it?

In the 200-plus years since we boldly embarked on this experiment in self-government, we have been steadily losing ground to the government’s brazen power grabs, foisted upon us in the so-called name of national security.

We have relinquished control over the most intimate aspects of our lives to government officials who, while they may occupy seats of authority, are neither wiser, smarter, more in tune with our needs, more knowledgeable about our problems, nor more aware of what is really in our best interests.

The government has knocked us off our rightful throne. It has usurped our rightful authority. It has staged the ultimate coup. Its agents no longer even pretend that they answer to “we the people.”

Worst of all, “we the people” have become desensitized to this constant undermining of our freedoms.

How do we reconcile the Founders’ vision of the government as an entity whose only purpose is to serve the people with the police state’s insistence that the government is the supreme authority, that its power trumps that of the people themselves, and that it may exercise that power in any way it sees fit (that includes government agents crashing through doors, mass arrests, ethnic cleansing, racial profiling, indefinite detentions without due process, and internment camps)?

They cannot be reconciled. They are polar opposites.

We are fast approaching a moment of reckoning where we will be forced to choose between the vision of what America was intended to be (a model for self-governance where power is vested in the people) and the reality of what it has become (a police state where power is vested in the government).

We are repeating the mistakes of history—namely, allowing a totalitarian state to reign over us.

Former concentration camp inmate Hannah Arendt warned against this when she wrote:

“No matter what the specifically national tradition or the particular spiritual source of its ideology, totalitarian government always transformed classes into masses, supplanted the party system, not by one-party dictatorships, but by mass movement, shifted the center of power from the army to the police, and established a foreign policy openly directed toward world domination.”

So where does that leave us?

Aldous Huxley predicted that eventually the government would find a way of “making people love their servitude, and producing dictatorship without tears, so to speak, producing a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies, so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them, but will rather enjoy it, because they will be distracted from any desire to rebel by propaganda or brainwashing, or brainwashing enhanced by pharmacological methods. And this seems to be the final revolution.”

The answer? Get un-brainwashed, as I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People and in its fictional counterpart The Erik Blair Diaries,

Stop allowing yourself to be distracted and diverted.

Learn your rights.

Stand up for the founding principles.

Make your voice and your vote count for more than just political posturing.

Never cease to vociferously protest the erosion of your freedoms at the local and national level.

Most of all, do these things today.

---

BREAKING: Dan Bongino Breaks Spy Story Of The Century, Alex Jones Sends Emergency Message

---