French Election Results Could Strengthen Putin’s Hand
Professor Przemysław Żurawski vel Grajewski, a political scientist and advisor to Polish President Andrzej Duda, expressed serious concerns about the results of the French parliamentary elections, citing the pro-Russian inclinations of the winning coalition as a significant threat.
The New Popular Front, a left-wing alliance including the Socialist Party, the Greens, the French Communist Party, and Jean-Luc Mélenchon’s France Unbowed (LFI ), emerged victorious. This coalition will now join forces with President Emmanuel Macron’s party.
Professor Żurawski vel Grajewski suggested to Polish news outlet wPolityce.pl that Macron’s strategy to allow Marine Le Pen a role in parliament was intended to politically exhaust her party before the next presidential election.
“Macron’s main idea was to allow Le Pen into parliament, exhausting her party before the next presidential election. But this has backfired, weakening the left-liberal camp instead,” said Żurawski vel Grajewski.
The professor criticized Macron’s recent rhetoric advocating for military support to Ukraine as ultimately empty, indicating no real shift in France’s stance against Russia.
“The results of the elections in France are concerning precisely because of the pro-Russian stance of their winner. Macron’s rhetoric, which in recent months has called for sending troops to Ukraine, turned out to be empty words. It is hard to assume that the president of France was so naive as to believe that he would get NATO’s support for this idea. He proposed it only because he knew such a plan would be scuttled,” Żurawski vel Grajewski explained.
With the new parliamentary backdrop, there may be a rejuvenation of pro-Russian sentiment, which poses a significant risk to not just France’s but also Europe’s stability.
He highlighted the potential increase in Russian influence in France, stating, “Mélenchon, a deeply pro-Russian and communist politician, represents a dangerous shift. The long-built narrative of stopping the ‘Putinists’ has crumbled.”
Mélenchon has even hinted at withdrawing from NATO, a statement with implications that remain uncertain as the new government takes shape.
Looking ahead, Professor Żurawski vel Grajewski remains pessimistic about the influence of France and Germany on the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, suggesting that both countries, regardless of their public postures, subtly lean towards Russia. He concludes by reflecting on the internal challenges within France, including immigration and the threat of Islamist extremism, which the new government is unlikely to address effectively, potentially leading to increased social unrest ahead of the next presidential elections.
“We are facing an anti-Atlantic force, hostile to NATO and very open to cooperation with Russia,” he warned.
BREAKING: Biden Pledges To Never Leave, Throwing Deep State Into Panic
North Carolina Teen Punished for Asking About the Term ‘Illegal Aliens’ in Class
A North Carolina high school student is in the middle of a lawsuit after he was suspended following a classroom incident involving the use of the phrase “illegal aliens” in front of a Hispanic classmate.
On April 9, Christian McGhee, a 16-year-old student from Central Davidson High School in Lexington, North Carolina, asked his English teacher if the term “aliens” referred to “space alliance or illegal aliens who need green cards?”
A classmate of Hispanic heritage jokingly responded with a threat, which McGhee’s lawyers contend was not taken seriously by either party.
(Related: Illegal immigrants use ROPE made from CLOTHES to cross Rio Grande into Texas.)
“Christian asked his question,” said Dean McGhee, educational freedom attorney at the Liberty Justice Center. “A boy in his class, of Hispanic heritage, jokingly said ‘Hey, I’m going to kick your …’” and used an expletive. McGhee added that after the dialogue the class continued as usual without any sign of a real conflict.
However, the teacher reported the interaction to school administrators, not for the words used but for the perceived threat.
Assistant Principal Eric Anderson, in a conversation with Leah McGhee, Christian’s mother, equated her son’s use of “illegal aliens” to the use of a racial slur. Anderson also discussed the incident with the students involved, with the Hispanic student clarifying that his comment was a joke and that he was not offended. But Christian still received a three-day suspension and was barred from participating in a track meet, without an option to appeal.
In response to the disciplinary measures, McGhee and his parents, Leah and Chad McGhee, filed a lawsuit against the Davidson County School District Board of Education on May 7.
The plaintiffs argue that Christian’s rights to free speech, education and due process have been violated by unfairly suspending and injecting race into a question of clarification from an English teacher. In turn, they seek to have his academic record cleared and the suspension reversed.
Moreover, the McGhee family, along with the legal organization the Liberty Justice Center and Raleigh-area lawyers Troy Shelton and Craig Schauer, requested a preliminary injunction on June 4 in the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina. The lawsuit aims to ensure Christian’s record is cleared to prevent any negative impact on his future opportunities, such as college admissions and scholarships. But the injunction is still pending.
Christian labeled as racist and ostracized for asking a simple question
According to Christian’s parents, Christian was labeled a racist and ostracized and bullied by his peers while receiving threats following his return to school after his short suspension.
“I have raised our son to reject racism in all its forms, but it is the school, not Christian, that injected race into this incident. It appears that this administration would rather destroy its own reputation and the reputation of my son rather than admit they made a mistake,” Leah said in a statement released by the Liberty Justice Center.
This, in turn, led to Christian’s withdrawal from school and his homeschooling for the remainder of the academic year.
“Even though Christian asked a factual, non-threatening question – about a word the class was discussing – the school board branded him with false accusations of racism. The school has not only violated his constitutional right to free speech, but also his right to due process and his right to access education, a guaranteed right under North Carolina law. We are proud to stand beside Christian and his family in challenging this egregious violation of the First and Fourteenth Amendments,” said Buck Dougherty, a senior counsel at Liberty Justice Center.
“It impacts, every student in the country, and their right to speak without fear of aggressive retaliation from their administration. In this case, our client, in the context of the conversation, asked a question that on its face was racially neutral. It was earnest in the class discussion. From there, the administration fabricated a racial incident and had the audacity to tell a Hispanic student who said he was not offended that he should have been offended. We want to make sure this doesn’t happen again.”
Read more stories about illegal aliens at Migrants.news.
Watch this clip discussing how El Paso Mayor Oscar Leeser has declared a state of emergency to prepare for the inevitable surge of illegals crossing the border once Title 42 ends.
BREAKING: Biden Pledges To Never Leave, Throwing Deep State Into Panic
Israel Used ‘Hannibal Directive’ to Kill its Own People on October 7, Local Media Reports
(LifeSiteNews) — Since Hamas launched Operation Aqsa Flood on October 7 last year the Israeli narrative has been repeatedly challenged by evidence that its intelligence services knew of the attacks in advance, and that the Israeli armed forces had followed a protocol to kill its own citizens rather than permit them to be taken hostage.
Known as the Hannibal Directive, its existence has been confirmed. Until this week, however, there was only circumstantial evidence it had been followed on October 7, 2023.
On July 7, 2024, Israeli newspaper Haaretz published claims of proof that Israeli armed forces were instructed to kill Israelis to prevent their capture.
The article states:
Communication networks could not keep up with the flow of information, as was the case for soldiers sending these reports. However, the message conveyed at 11:22 A.M. across the Gaza Division network was understood by everyone. ‘Not a single vehicle can return to Gaza’ was the order.
At this point, the IDF was not aware of the extent of kidnapping along the Gaza border, but it did know that many people were involved. Thus, it was entirely clear what that message meant, and what the fate of some of the kidnapped people would be.
This was not the first order given by the division with the intent of foiling kidnapping even at the expense of the lives of the kidnapped, a procedure known in the army as the ‘Hannibal procedure.’
Documents obtained by Haaretz, as well as testimonies of soldiers, mid-level and senior IDF officers, reveal a host of orders and procedures laid down by the Gaza Division, Southern Command and the IDF General Staff up to the afternoon hours of that day, showing how widespread this procedure was, from the first hours following the attack and at various points along the border…
The decision to conduct attacks inside outposts, says a senior defense official, will haunt senior commanders all their lives. ‘Anyone making such a decision knew that our combatants in the area could be hit as well.’…
At that point, the army did not know the number of people who had been kidnapped. ‘We thought they numbered dozens at that stage,’ a military source told Haaretz. Firing mortars at the Gaza Strip would endanger them as well. Furthermore, another order given at 11:22 A.M., according to which no vehicle would be allowed to return to Gaza, took this a step further.
‘Everyone knew by then that such vehicles could be carrying kidnapped civilians or soldiers,’ a source in Southern Command told Haaretz. ‘There was no case in which a vehicle carrying kidnapped people was knowingly attacked, but you couldn’t really know if there were any such people in a vehicle. I can’t say there was a clear instruction, but everyone knew what it meant to not let any vehicles return to Gaza.’
The charge that Israeli forces acted in this manner was initially dismissed with references to holocaust denial. Many atrocities claimed by Israel to have taken place on October 7 were simply made up, with lurid claims about babies being repeated by the president of the United States.
Joe Biden claimed to have seen photos which do not exist, and Ben Shapiro posted a fake photo of a baby burned in an oven, first distributed by Benjamin Netanyahu’s office.
The claims of burned and beheaded babies came from organizations seeking to fundraise from the creation of atrocity stories useful to the Israeli government’s media campaign.
Warnings ignored
Earlier this summer, evidence emerged that members of Israel’s Unit 8200 intelligence brigade warned their superiors of an imminent attack by Hamas, to be carried out almost exactly as it took place on October 7.
READ: Israel knew about the October 7 attacks in advance. Why did it do nothing to stop them?
Subsequent reports revealed Israel had known for at least one year of the buildup and blueprint for the October 7 assault by Hamas. The Israeli high court ordered an investigation into the “intelligence failures” which permitted the attacks to be halted, as the Jewish News Service reported on June 17.
With this latest revelation, the official narrative of October 7 itself more closely resembles a “conspiracy theory” – which is how all the evidence against it has been routinely framed by pro-Zionist media and politicians.
Anatomy of a directive
A report by Antiwar.com’s Kyle Anzalone described the revelations made in the Israeli media this week:
A review by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) set to be released this summer will conclude that Israeli soldiers killed many of their own people on October 7, Israeli media reported.
Israel’s Channel 12 News reported on July 6 that the preliminary findings of an investigation into IDF action leaves no doubt that “Many casualties were due to the firing of our own forces.”
This report cites Kibbutz Be’eri, where houses were destroyed by Israeli tank shells, killing civilian occupants.
A previous investigation in April by the IDF cleared General Barak Hiram of killing civilians by ordering the shelling of houses, finding instead that the occupants of one house were killed by “small arms fire.” Now the IDF is set to release the findings of a new probe into the events of October 7, with some details already discussed in the Israeli media.
The latest inquiry emphasizes confusion and panic, rather than the implementation of a kill order – says Anzalone’s report.
“The IDF’s October 7 review appears to point to incompetence rather than the intentional killing of its own civilians.”
Yet an investigation by Israel’s Ynet News said in January 2024 that an order to follow the Hannibal Directive had been given to the IDF.
Citing the official Israeli investigation into the October 7 attacks, which it calls the “7 Days” report, Ynet said.
One of the revelations revealed in the investigation is that on midnight of October 7, the IDF ordered all of its actual combat units on the Hannibal procedure, though without clearly stating this explicit name.
The Jerusalem Post said the report proved the IDF had killed many Israeli civilians – attributing these deaths to “friendly fire errors.”
“According to the report, the probe will find numerous cases of friendly fire errors leading to tragic deaths and groups of IDF soldiers who were too hesitant to confront Hamas invaders (as still others rushed to fight without being formally summoned),” the Jerusalem Post added.
Antiwar also collated previous reports of Israeli forces killing its own civilians, including via airstrikes and the use of indiscriminate fire into residential areas and an order by one Israeli commander to bomb his own men.
IDF field commander Bar Zonshein acknowledged the existence of the Hannibal Directive in the same interview in which he confirmed he had ordered an attack on his own unit, and Israel IDF Colonel Nof Erez described the Israeli response on October 7 as a “mass Hannibal” operation.
Despite the evidence of bombed-out houses, vehicles destroyed by airstrikes, and the statements of serving Israeli commanders on the day, journalists who have reported on these incidents have been smeared in the mainstream media, with their findings dismissed as misinformation.
Repeated attacks on the truth
In one of many attempts to discredit the reporting of the truth about October 7, the Washington Post ran a piece on January 21 framing critics of the discredited Israeli narrative as paranoid “truthers.” It was part of the creation of another false narrative – that anyone who had reasonable doubts about the official version of events was simply denying the attacks took place.
Claims such as “Israel murdered their own people on October 7,” were framed as “denial.” This report was produced by a group backed by the Anti-Defamation League – and George Soros’ Open Society Foundations.
Former Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett had claimed on November 14 that a girl had been “murdered” in Kibbutz Be’eri “by Hamas.”
In fact, as Haaretz had reported the previous month, Israeli tanks fired on her position. Her death by Israeli tank fire was confirmed by a witness who survived the attack. Published by Israeli media, these reports were written up by Max Blumenthal. For bringing facts like these to a Western audience, he was called a liar.
Haaretz attacked journalist Max Blumenthal personally for highlighting this and many inconsistencies in the stories presented in the mainstream media, which were echoedby leading U.S. politicians.
In addition to the latest Israeli army investigation, a June 12 report by the United Nations vindicates Blumenthal’s findings, which saw him branded a “liar” by Haaretz.
A bill was passed in the Israeli Parliament on February 7 supporting the charge that “anyone who denies the massacre that Hamas perpetrated on October 7 is no less than a Holocaust denier.”
None of the reports questioning the official media narrative have denied that Hamas killed a large number of civilians and Israeli military personnel. Instead, they questioned Israel’s atrocity propaganda, created to justify its horrific war on the civilian population of Gaza.
So why were people who were reporting the facts framed as holocaust deniers?
Israeli intelligence responded to growing suspicion over the false claims made about October 7 with a propaganda campaign. At its centre was this January 26 video, which warned of the imaginary danger of “October 7 denial”– saying this was the same as denying the holocaust.
The video’s script was repeated almost verbatim by Donald Trump, who told Fox News’ Sean Hannity in June:
You watch these people on television, and then just, like, you have Holocaust deniers also, they say the Holocaust never took (place). It’s the exact same people. They’re saying it never happened.
In the light of all the above, the Al Jazeera documentary on October 7 by award-winning British TV producer, journalist, and author Richard Sanders has gained more credibility.
No one is saying October 7 never happened. “Denial” was the historically charged smear applied to anyone who noticed the obvious difference between the facts and the demonic actions claimed in the press. The claim of denial offered no evidence beyond a few posts on Reddit.
READ: Uncovering the truth behind Israel’s justification for its war in Gaza
As we have seen in recent years, “conspiracy theory” is a term designed to label the prudent and the discerning as deranged, and the gullible as wise.
Even the Israelis themselves now admit they killed their own people on the day. The charge of denial is as much a fabrication as the beheaded and burned babies whose non-existent pictures Joe Biden said he had seen.
With so many questions around the October 7 story, how long can the narrative of denial survive this argument with the evidence?
BREAKING: Biden Pledges To Never Leave, Throwing Deep State Into Panic
Germany: Berlin Bank Cancels AfD Donations Account After Grannies’ Petition
Berliner Volksbank has terminated the donation account previously held by the Alternative for Germany (AfD) federal party after pressure from a left-wing group.
The move was announced by “Omas gegen Rechts” (“Grannies against the right”), a campaign that had launched an online petition calling for the political party to be debanked, which received more than 33,500 signatures.
Official confirmations from the financial institution and the party are not yet available. However, the Volksbank account has disappeared from the AfD website. Donations are now only collected by direct debit or via Paypal, according to Welt newspaper.
According to German daily, the “Grannies against the Right” met with the CEO of Berliner Volksbank, Carsten Jung, last Wednesday. It is unclear why the bank’s chief executive met with the campaign group.
The official reason for the account termination as provided by the bank is that the AfD is “outside the constitutional order.”
Berliner Volksbank was heavily involved in the anti-right-wing protests at the beginning of the year.
The AfD came second in last month’s EU parliamentary elections and remains top of several statewide polls, particularly in Eastern federal states.
The move comes as other conservatives and right-wing politicians have faced debanking campaigns across the Western world. Remix News previously reported that Nigel Farage, the Reform UK MP and party leader, had his bank account shutdown due to his conservative views in 2023.
I now have evidence Coutts LIED to me..
— Nigel Farage MP (@Nigel_Farage) July 18, 2023
In an explosive 40 page memo, “Brexit” is mentioned 86 times, “Russia” 144 & “PEP” 10.
Support for Trump + views on immigration, net zero & the vaccine are listed as reasons to exit me.
They say my account is commercially viable! pic.twitter.com/QjPCuUetu3
Writing for the Telegraph, Farge called the “Stasi-style surveillance report” shocking.
“Monthly press checks were made on me. My social media accounts were monitored. Anything considered ‘problematic’ was recorded. I was being watched,” he wrote.
German banks have also gotten more political, such as what many consider the most German of German banks, Sparkasse. The bank sparked controversy when certain employees proposed blocking donation transfers to the AfD in its campaign against the party.
BREAKING: Biden Pledges To Never Leave, Throwing Deep State Into Panic
EU Commission Urges Digital ID, E-Health Records & Touts ‘Anti-Disinformation’ Efforts in Digital Decade Report
Earlier this week the EU Commission (EC) published its second report on what it calls “the state of the digital decade,” urging member countries to step up the push to increase access and incentivize the use of digital ID and electronic health records.
At the same time, the bloc is satisfied with how the crackdown on “disinformation,” “online harms,” and the like is progressing.
In a press release, the EC said the report was done to assess the progress made in reaching the objectives contained in the Digital Decade Policy Program (DDPP), targeting 2030 as the year of completion.
EU members have now for the first time contributed to the document with analyses of their national “Digital Decade strategic roadmaps.” And, here, the EC is not exactly satisfied: the members’ efforts will not meet the EU’s “level of ambition” if things continue to develop as they currently are, the document warns.
In that vein, while the report is generally upbeat on the uptake of digital ID (eID schemes) and the use of e-Health records, its authors point out that there are “still significant differences among countries” in terms of eID adoption.
To remedy member countries falling short on these issues, it is recommended that they push for increased access to eID and e-Health records in order to meet the objectives set for 2030.
The EU wants to see both these schemes available to 100% of citizens and businesses by that date – and reveals that eID is at this point available to 93% of citizens across the 27 of the bloc’s countries, “despite uneven take-up.”
Still, the EC’s report shows that policymakers in Brussels are optimistic that the EU digital ID Wallet will “incentivize” eID use.
And, the document’s authors are happy with the way the controversial Digital Services Act (DSA) is getting enforced. Critics, however, believe it is there to facilitate crackdowns on speech – under the guise of combating “disinformation,” etc.
The EU calls this, “strengthening the protection against online harms and disinformation,” while also mentioning that it is launching investigations (into online platforms) to make sure DSA is enforced.
And in order to reinforce the message that DSA is needed as a force for good, the report asserts that “online risks are on the rise and disinformation has been identified as one of the most destabilizing factors for our societies, requiring comprehensive, coordinated action across borders and actors.”
BREAKING: Biden Pledges To Never Leave, Throwing Deep State Into Panic
Beware the Threat of the ‘One Health’ Agenda
Because planetary health is supposedly at stake, the world’s power brokers have come up with a devious agenda called “One Health” that threatens to enslave the planet under food and medicine tyranny.
A “sick twist,” to quote the Brownstone Institute’s Tracy Thurman, on the age-old adage “Let your food be your medicine,” One Health is a full-scale assault on food, medicine and life itself. It will hand control over everything that sustains health to globalist eugenicists who want to cull the world’s population.
According to Thurman, the plan is to remove all control over food and medicine from the common man. “Doctors” will write people grocery prescriptions and don’t even think about purchasing your own dietary supplements at will.
“Mull over what the elites are actively eliminating from the food supply, as well as the food-adjacent substances they are adding,” Thurman suggests as a starting point for understanding what One Health entails.
“Consider the brainwashing of most doctors during Covid, and their refusal to recommend basic health supplements, sunshine, Vitamin D, or effective early treatment, instead leaving their patients at the mercy of remdesivir, ventilators, and mRNA shots. If you don’t love the idea of cricket meal and vaccine lettuce prescriptions, this agenda should raise your eyebrows.”
(Related: Biological warfare epidemiologist Dr. Meryl Nass is warning that the One Health agenda will reduce humans to the same status as animals and ecosystems.)
Bill Gates, of course, is behind One Health
The usual suspects are behind the One Health plot. Billionaire eugenicist Bill Gates is of course backing the scheme as is the World Health Organization (WHO), the World Bank, the Rockefeller Foundation, the CDC, the FDA, the NIH, the USDA, “and every other Covid culprit you can think of,” Thurman says.
There is a very real risk under One Health of healthcare being rationed or even withheld based on the determination of the “authorities” as to your need for care. There are also destructive climate change dogmas embedded within the plot that are explicitly anti-human.
“When you consider the explicit Malthusian beliefs of the globalists, such an idea carries untold risk,” Thurman warns.
“The managers of society clearly believe that the planet’s ecosystems would benefit from a reduction in the number of peasants, and this new health paradigm allows them to factor that dogma into the decision of whether you deserve life-saving care, the right to opt out of vaccination, the right to real, natural food, or life at all.”
Canada serves as a blueprint for what the globalists want to see implemented here in the United States. Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD), also known as euthanasia, is now the sixth-leading cause of death in our neighbor to the north – and the world’s self-chosen architects want the same for America.
The One Health framework would allow for MAiD to expand everywhere. And any other scheme like MAiD that reduces the number of people living in the world will expand alongside it.
“If the health of animals, people, and the environment are all to be weighed equally, the agenda goes far beyond the doctor’s office,” Thurman says. “Where you live, where you can travel, what you buy, how you can spend your money, and what you can eat would all fall under this totalitarian biosecurity system.”
“Think about this combined with central bank digital currencies, or CBDCs, a system already rolling out in other countries and planned for launch here in the United States. Under this system, all money is digital and centrally controlled. The federal government can program your money so you can only spend it on approved items. Your grocery prescription of insect powder and mRNA-laced vegetables may become mandatory unless you have already established an alternate food supply with the option to pay in an independent currency.”
If they can get away with it, the globalists will enslave every last person on planet earth under the guise of “sustainability.” Learn more at Tyranny.news.
BREAKING: Biden Pledges To Never Leave, Throwing Deep State Into Panic