News

Apologists rely on ‘Trust me, bro’ deflection strategy as Biden’s mental decline a national concern.

Bumbling 81-year-old puppet POTUS Joe Biden doesn’t need to take a cognitive test because he performs his job daily, White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre unashamedly argued.

Asked during a briefing Wednesday why Biden’s annual physical examination wouldn’t include a cognitive function screening, Jean-Pierre denied such a test was necessary and told reporters concerns over his mental decline were overblown.

“I think folks need to understand that the president passes again a cognitive test every day,” Jean-Pierre claimed.

The Biden admin propagandist went on to downplay the value of a clinical cognitive test characterizing it as a “15-minute appointment that is administered by someone that most of the time people don’t actually know.”

“And and the president has a team of doctors that is with him 24/7” she said, adding, “and he is able to do the work every day.”

“That is rigorous,” Pierre insisted. “That is more rigorous than it would be for any 15 minute clinical appointment.”

“The president doesn’t need a cognitive test,” she continued, claiming those were the word’s of Biden’s physician.

Jean-Pierre then defended not having Biden’s doctor at the briefing, claiming it wasn’t “the norm.”

The press sec’s fierce defense of the Democrat leader followed Biden’s trip to Walter Reed hospital Wednesday for an annual physical examination.

“They think I look too young,” Biden, the oldest US president, joked following his check-up.

“President Biden is a healthy, active, robust, 81-year-old male who remains fit to successfully execute the duties of the Presidency, to include those as Chief Executive, Head of State and Commander in Chief,” stated a letter by Dr. Kevin O’Connor, adding he had “no new concerns” with Biden.

While the White House claims Biden’s mentally fit to serve, Mollie Hemingway notes at the same time Special Counsel Robert Hur’s justification for not filing charges against him was that a jury would take pity on Biden due to his advanced age and senility.

The refusal to take a cognitive test comes as more Americans are expressing concerns with Biden’s mental ability as his deterioration becomes more apparent each passing day.

---

The globalists are increasing their attacks on Infowars and the stakes have never been higher!

Please consider donating and visit InfowarsStore.com for merch, nutraceuticals and survival gear.

---

Follow the author on X, Facebook, Gab, Minds, Truth Social and Gettr.

---

---

With the presidential immunity case stalled for nearly three months and will miss the originally scheduled March 4 trial date — cue the liberal meltdowns!

The Supreme Court granted certiorari of former President Donald Trump’s presidential immunity claim in the federal criminal case charging him for actions on Jan. 6, 2021.

The presidential immunity defense has stalled the case for nearly three months and will miss the originally scheduled March 4 trial date.

The high court’s decision automatically stays lower courts from moving forward in the case.

As Catherine Yang reports at The Epoch Times, the court also granted special counsel Jack Smith’s request that President Trump’s petition for a stay be treated as a petition for review.

“The case will be set for oral argument during the week of April 22,” the order reads.

• URGENT! Keep Alex Jones in the fight against the NWO! Please pray & contribute at DefendJones.com today!

The parties have been instructed to limit arguments to the question:

“Whether and if so to what extent does a former President enjoy presidential immunity from criminal prosecution for conduct alleged to involve official acts during his tenure in office.”

The Supreme Court’s framing combines the various questions the former president and special counsel had presented to the court.

Prosecutors argued that presidents enjoy no immunity from criminal prosecution, while defense attorneys argued that official acts of a president during his tenure are protected by presidential immunity.

Read the full one-page order from SCOTUS below:

President Trump had originally filed a motion to dismiss the case based on presidential immunity last year.

When U.S. District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan rejected the motion in December, the defense took the case to appeals court, putting the pretrial schedule in limbo.

A federal appeals court panel rejected this defense on Feb. 6, and in an atypical order withheld its mandate on the condition that President Trump take his case to the Supreme Court by Feb. 12.

Normally, the appellants would be allowed to petition for a rehearing with the whole bench of the appeals court, which might have drawn out the process for a few more months. The appeals panels expressly ordered that a rehearing petition would not stay the case.

President Trump’s attorneys then asked the high court to stay all lower court proceedings in a petition to the Chief Justice, and prosecutors responded by asking that the Supreme Court reject the petition for a stay.

Prosecutors had argued the court was unlikely to grant certiorari, as they declined to hear this same case last year when the special counsel petitioned the high court last year when the motion was appealed.

They also asked the court to schedule a hearing in March if it did grant certiorari, or review of a lower court’s actions.

The Supreme Court has dismissed the application for a stay as moot because granting certiorari would effectively halt lower court proceedings.

“Without expressing a view on the merits, this Court directs the Court of Appeals to continue withholding issuance of the mandate until the sending down of the judgment of this Court,” the new order reads.

President Trump’s briefs and any amicus curiae briefs need to be filed by March 19, and prosecutors have until April 8 to respond. President Trump can then file a reply brief by April 15, and arguments will be heard the week of April 22. A specific date for the hearing was not set.

This is the second case President Trump has brought before the Supreme Court this year.

The high court is also set to rule on whether President Trump is eligible to appear on the ballot after the Colorado Supreme Court ruled he was disqualified under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, finding the Jan. 6, 2021 Capitol breach an “insurrection.”

Jonathan Turley said on X that “the order setting argument on immunity for April 22 is a blow to Smith on the calendar.”

“Rather than granting a stay, it has constructively created such a stay by scheduling the argument. Keep in mind, even if Smith prevails, pre-trial work must wait for the return of the mandate…

…Even if the Court issues a decision before June in favor of the government, the trial court must hash out discovery and other motions. That would push the trial closer to the November election in tension with existing DOJ policies.”

The mainstream media is distraught…

the tone in MSNBC and Andrew Weissmann is like end of the world pic.twitter.com/HdAtAcXcCH

— Andrew Fisher (@acpandy) February 28, 2024

Epoch Times’ Catherine Tang notes that the concept of presidential immunity was defined by the Supreme Court in a 1982 case where a fired military contractor sued former President Richard Nixon after he lost his job.

The high court ruled a president’s immunity from civil suit was “absolute” and that it extended to the “outer perimeter” of his office.

President Trump’s attorneys argue that his actions on Jan. 6 were part of his official duties as president, pointing to his record of taking election integrity seriously.

Prosecutors argue that President Trump has no immunity in this case because it is a criminal case.

The Supreme Court has never addressed whether presidents have immunity from criminal prosecution, making the issue untested legal territory.

President Trump’s attorneys say that to open presidents up to criminal prosecution in this way will only invite partisan retaliation by opposing administrations and opens up former presidents to prosecution for official acts.

They argued in court filings that criminal prosecutions have never been pursued against presidents in or out of office because it was understood to “dimish” the office the way a civil suit would. They added that the court has said that the proper redress would be through impeachment.

Prosecutors, meanwhile, argue that no criminal prosecutions have been brought against other presidents because Jan. 6 was unique, but a case could have been brought against President Nixon, who was pardoned.

---

Raw Story falsely claimed Jones had ‘turned on’ Musk.

Leftist rag Raw Story published a disingenuous article Tuesday misrepresenting comments by Infowars radio host Alex Jones, falsely claiming Jones labeled X owner Elon Musk a “complete and total fraud.”

RELATED: Fake News 101: Media Falsely Claims Alex Jones Called Elon Musk A ‘Fraud’

---

See the full Alex Jones segment in question below:

---

Film producer Mikki Willis lays out how to find God amid the trials and tribulations you, your family and the country faces — tune in!

Film producer Mikki Willis joins Alex Jones live in-studio to deliver his powerful testimony on how he found God and awakened his soul.

POWERFUL: Humanity Must Break Free From The Mind Control And Defend Our Children On The Front Line Of The Infowar pic.twitter.com/2t38G9hFxe

— Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) February 28, 2024

---

Take your kids out of public school if at all possible

A video going viral online shows an underage student dancing with a blue-haired “teacher” to a sexually explicit and vulgar song.

In the brief video, the young girl mouths along to the lyrics and does hand motions matching the song.

The song goes, “I play with her pearl. And I can fuck up her whole world. Boi-oi-oing. She bounce on that dick. Toes curled. But fuck these bitches, I’m tryna run up these riches.”

Misspelled text on the screen of the video reads, “Dance with a teacher after are ternement,” showing the kid could likely use some more time in English class and less time dancing to graphic music.

Commenters online criticized the teacher and questioned parents who send their children to public schools.

---

---

This is a perfect example of why conservatives are anti-illegal immigration and pro-Second Amendment

A recent New York Post article focusing on the tragic murder of Laken Riley at the hands of an illegal immigrant last week suggested her attacker “panicked” after she fought back against his assault.

“Laken Riley likely fought back before migrant allegedly killed her: profiler,” the article’s headline reads.

The report states, “The Venezuelan migrant charged with murdering Laken Riley likely panicked and bashed in her skull when the brave nursing student tried to fight back, according to an analysis by a former criminal profiler.”

Commenters on X slammed the journalist behind the article for essentially telling future victims to just give in to their attackers instead of fighting back:

“Holy Funking Shlit they are trying to blame Laken Riley now. If I typed what I want to type I would get banned,” wrote Human Events Senior Editor Jack Posobiec.

The American Journal host Harrison Smith called the NY Post headline “horribly irresponsible” and encouraged women to fight back if they’re ever in a similar situation.

Popular X account Wall Street Silver wrote, “Imagine how frightened he must have been. It must have been horrible for the illegal migrant.’”

Most people online pointed out the murder was a direct result of Democrat policies that have left the southern border wide open and allow criminals to be repeatedly let out of police custody.

On Wednesday, Democrat Athens, Georgia, Mayor Kelly Girtz faced heated backlash during a press conference after downplaying the murder by defending illegal immigration and insinuating it was the fault of former President Donald Trump.

“I want to say that we center our work here in Athens-Clarke County on people’s humanity and part of everybody’s humanity is the expectation of human dignity. While 2019 was not that long ago, you might remember the dynamic we were living in in the late teens in this country where you had the president of the United States speak in the most vile terms about people who were foreign-born and you had that notion metastasizing —” he said before being cut off by furious citizens.

The establishment is doing everything possible to cover up for the crimes being committed by illegal aliens across America each and every day.

---