Legislating Our Way Out
On Saturday I wrote about the potential for mass culling of dairy cows in the US, in response to growing fears about bird flu. Headlines have suggested that the poultry industry has valuable lessons for the dairy industry in containing the spread of this still largely benign respiratory disease. Since 2022, 100 million poultry have been slaughtered in the US, and even if we haven’t quite reached the stage where so-called experts and officials are saying we must kill large numbers of cows, I don’t think we’re far off, frankly.
Deborah Birx—a key player in the COVID-19 pandemic—has said we need PCR-testing of herds right now, which will only serve to inflate the number of cases massively, and it’s not hard to see how rising cases, perhaps in conjunction with the emergence of a new, more dangerous, strain of bird flu, could lead to the death of thousands, hundreds of thousands or even millions of cows. Remember, six million cows were killed by the British government in 2001 to prevent the spread of foot-and-mouth, a pretty mild disease that infected a little more than 2,000 animals. The carnage was apocalyptic. The British government considered using napalm to dispose of the corpses, there were so many.
My main point, in writing that piece of analysis, was to suggest that mass culling could serve to kill two birds with one stone, as the old proverb has it.
On the one hand, mass culling would make it very clear that the bird-flu crisis really is just that: a crisis. Maybe even the beginning of another pandemic. We’re being told there will be a bird-flu pandemic: it’s just a matter of time. Two days ago, former CDC director Robert Redfield said exactly that.
And on the other hand, mass culling would also serve a useful purpose furthering the climate-change agenda, by helping, through artificial scarcity, to wean us off those awful unhealthy animal products that are destroying the environment and our health—or so we’re supposed to believe.
Mass culling has already been proposed as a strategy for the Irish government to meet its climate targets. Last year, the Irish government suggested killing 200,000 cows over a period of three years, because it wants to cut 25% of the nation’s agricultural emissions by 2030.
Agriculture and the foods we eat are a huge part of the climate-change agenda. The rulers of the universe and the global NGO-media-corporate combine waste no opportunities to tell us that traditional farming, and livestock farming in particular, is bringing our world to the edge of disaster. Our “addiction” to meat, especially in the West, needs to be “cured.” Fast.
But that “cure” will not come through consumer choice, that much is perfectly clear. We know this beyond a shadow of a doubt. Consumers don’t want to give up meat and other animal products. A majority of Australian men would rather die ten years early than give up meat. Even in food shortages, the vegan aisles and the alternative-protein sections in stores and supermarkets remain full: we saw this during the pandemic, and it made for some pretty funny memes.
The “answer,” then, is to take consumer choice out of the equation altogether. By hook and by crook—through a combination of inflation, artificial scarcity, social pressure, and carbon taxes and other regulations—ordinary people are going to be priced out of animal foods. World governments won’t ban meat. You just won’t be able to buy it as anything other than a luxury. But there’ll be plenty of plant-based meat and insect burgers, and through sheer desperation and boredom you’ll give in and start eating them instead because you want something that vaguely resembles the real thing to go between two buns with some lettuce and mayo when you get home from work in the evening.
I’ve been warning for some time, including in my book The Eggs Benedict Option, that governments are not going to ban meat to stop us from eating it. Instead, they’re going to resort to less direct measures, to provide the illusion that we’re actually choosing to eat less meat… pic.twitter.com/OzegGhzO2e
— RAW EGG NATIONALIST (@Babygravy9) November 3, 2023
So what do we—the people who want to eat meat—do about this? How do we fight back?
Well, we could start by taking a leaf out of Ron DeSantis’s book.
I’ve probably been a bit hard on Ron DeSantis in recent months, because of his embarrassing presidential run, but now that he’s hung up those special cowboy boots and stopped pulling that bizarre smile, it’s easy to recognise him for what he is: a really good state governor.
DeSantis demonstrated that last month by becoming the first governor to ban lab-grown meat in his state. It’s now a second-degree misdemeanour to produce or sell lab-grown meat in the Sunshine State.
DeSantis knows what’s up. Having put his name to the bill, he said he wanted to protect Florida’s “vibrant agricultural industry” against “globalist elites” and “an ideological agenda that wants to finger agriculture as the problem, that uses things like raising cattle as destroying our climate.”
“This will be people who will lecture the rest of us about things like global warming, they will say you can’t drive an internal combustion vehicle, they will say agriculture is bad, meanwhile, they’re flying to Davos in their private jets.”
Alabama has now followed DeSantis’s lead, and it looks like Arizona and Tennessee will do too. Forgive me if I get ahead of myself, but this really could be the start of a nationwide fightback against fake food and the entire climate-change agenda it’s a part of.
Don’t get me wrong. I’m not generally an advocate for government telling people what they can and can’t eat. Government interventions in diet over the last century have been an unmitigated disaster. The propagation of bad corporate-sponsored science and outright lies like the Lipid-Heart Hypothesis—the theory that cholesterol and saturated fat from animal foods cause heart disease—have made us sicker than ever and placed us at an even further remove from the life-giving foods we need to thrive as human beings. Corporations control the food supply to an unprecedented degree, with the collusion of government, and most of us eat a steady diet of ultra-processed food sold to us wrapped in plastic (and also full of it).
If you want to understand why the lipid-heart hypothesis (cholesterol consumption increases blood cholesterol, which causes heart disease) is wrong, a good place to start is the Minnesota Coronary Experiment, whose results were so inconvenient they were buried for 40 years. ? pic.twitter.com/ZWiDFRobWa
— RAW EGG NATIONALIST (@Babygravy9) August 16, 2023
The simple fact is, though, that we can’t buy ourselves out of this mess as consumers. Buying as much meat and eggs and cheese as possible is not going to stop anything. It certainly won’t stop the government from culling dairy herds or imposing carbon taxes on the most “polluting” foods like meat and eggs and cheese. We must have political representation and a platform that states, without qualification, our basic need for nutrient-dense animal foods. That’s what my book The Eggs Benedict Option is about.
Of course, legislation banning products like lab-grown meat would be just the beginning. There would have to be other legislation too—legislation to make it easier for small farmers to produce and compete, legislation to prevent corporations and billionaires like Bill Gates from gobbling up huge tracts of prime farmland and using it to grow Frankenfood GMOs or simply taking it out of agricultural use to drive up prices. Our food system needs to change, radically. The globalists are right about this. They’re just wrong about the how and why.
I often hear people say “you can’t legislate your way out of a crisis,” but actually you can. At the very least, I think it’s a strong start.
Breaking Exclusive! Tucker Carlson Breaks The Internet In Powerful Interview With Alex Jones
Majority of Studies on the Topic Indicate Covid Injections DO Cause Menstrual Problems — BMJ Review
A review published by the British Medical Journal (BMJ) analyzed studies on the topic of Covid vaccinations and menstrual disorders. It discovered that the majority of studies indicate that the Covid injections do indeed cause women to experience problems with their periods.
“In this review we found evidence supporting an association between the COVID-19 vaccine and menstrual health outcomes,” the review said in the ‘Conclusions’ section.
The review only mentions temporary changes to menstruation was discovered, despite some research proving otherwise.
“Nonetheless, the bulk of the literature demonstrates that COVID-19 vaccine is associated with temporary changes in menstrual characteristics (cycle length and flow) and menstrual pain,” the review said in the ‘Results’ section.
The BMJ analyzed a total of 53 publications of 11 prospective cohort studies, 11 retrospective cohort studies or registry-based cohort studies and 31 cross-sectional or retrospective case–control studies on Covid injections affecting menstruation.
While not all-encompassing nor necessarily inclusive of the BMJ review, some research into the particular topic includes the following quotes from various studies:
“…there have been accumulating discussions on social media and blogs indicating that women have experienced menstrual changes, including altered menstrual duration, frequency, regularity, and volume (heavier bleeding and clotting), increased dysmenorrhoea and worsened premenstrual syndrome (PMS) (e.g. Morgan 202112). More recent anecdotal reports of menstrual changes after vaccination for COVID-19 have fuelled vaccine hesitancy or refusal,” the study (The COVID-19 pandemic and the menstrual cycle: research gaps and opportunities) said in the ‘Menstrual cycle features and the COVID-19 pandemic’ section.
“COVID-19 vaccination may be associated with short-term changes in usual menstrual cycle length, particularly among women whose cycles were short, long, or irregular before vaccination,” the study (A prospective study of the association between SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccination with changes in usual menstrual cycle characteristics) said in the ‘Conclusion’ section.
“This systematic review represents the most contemporary and largest evidence on the predictors and rate of menstrual problems after COVID-19 vaccination, including 78 138 patients. Furthermore, it shows that a significant number of women (52.05%) have experienced menstrual abnormalities after the COVID-19 vaccine,” the study (Menstrual abnormalities after COVID-19 vaccines: A systematic review) said in the ‘Discussion’ section.
“Analysing the menstrual flow more, we saw that 24.5% of the patients had increased flow, while 15.5% had reduced flow which for both changes in the flow, the p-value was 0.017. However, 23.65 showed delayed periods, and 51.6% showed no changes. The changes in the timing were significant,” the study (Short Term Effect of Corona Virus Diseases Vaccine on the Menstrual Cycles) said in the ‘Results’ section.
“Approximately 25% of vaccinated participants reported a change in their menstrual cycle after vaccination; the majority reported changes after their second dose (56%) as compared with their first (18%) and third (14%) doses. The most commonly reported changes were irregular menstruation (43%), increased premenstrual symptoms (34%), increased menstrual pain or cramps (30%), and abnormally heavy or prolonged bleeding (31%). High self-reported perceived stress levels compared with low perceived stress (OR, 2.22; 95% CI 1.12-4.37) and greater body mass index (OR, 1.04; 95% CI 1.00-1.07) were associated with greater odds of experiencing the menstrual cycle changes after the vaccination,” the study (COVID-19 vaccination and changes in the menstrual cycle among vaccinated persons) said in the ‘Results’ section.
The Covid shots are known to increase in lethality after repeated doses and double the death rate of Covid patients, yet the death rate is still higher than what is reported, increase Covid infection rates, result in insane and gross turbocancers, reproductive destruction, cause miscarriages, paralyzation, tinnitus, increased excess death rates, autoimmune disorders in the thyroid, as well as deadly headaches, seizures and heart inflammation including in children, while also causing the vaccinated people’s skin to ‘erupt’, in addition to a multitude of serious ailments seen in massive population studies and contain hundreds of times the allowable levels of DNA contamination leading to mutagenic effects, contaminating the blood supply, as well as permanently altering the DNA of the vaccinated and their offspring while being expected to kill people for a very long time into the future.
In the U.S. the CDC recommends all Americans receive their Covid shot and that young children receive extra, while Canada recommends another Covid shot for the pregnant, indigenous, ‘racialized’ & ‘equity-deserving’.
We Are In The Middle Of The Greatest Economic War In History, Warns Daniel Estulin
mRNA Vaccine ‘Off Switch’ Discovered — Study
A preprint study coauthored by Dr. Peter McCullough, published in May, described a novel method of deactivating the genetic alteration effects of the mRNA Covid vaccinations, providing hope to the billions of people who’ve been genetically mutated.
“The Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna biodistribution studies refute the assertion that nanolipid-bound nms-mRNA remains in the deltoid muscle or axillary lymph nodes. Detectable vaccine mRNA levels remaining in various tissues raises potential safety concerns,” the study said in the ‘Conclusions’ section. “The possibility of vaccine mRNA integration into the host genome and the prospect of unintended protein production due to read through advocate for a mechanism to eliminate lingering synthetic mRNA and halt damaging Spike protein production. The use of siRNA and RIBOTACs to target and degrade vaccine mRNA are promising approaches to mitigate deleterious health effects. The ability to readily tailor the siRNA and RIBOTACs to target an mRNA of interest makes these techniques particularly appealing, although further investigation is warranted to address challenges which include possible off-target effects and immune system activation.”
Messenger RNA (mRNA) technology, referred to in Moderna’s patents as modified mRNA or mmRNA for modified messenger RNA, is an exotic technology that encapsulates an altered RNA sequence within a lipid nanoparticle so as to introduce it into the cells of the vaccinated individual. The foreign man-made sequence is then incorporated into the cells of the vaccinated individual, thus acting more as a gene therapy than a traditional vaccine.
While the exotic injection makes the individual begin to produce the dangerous Covid spike protein, currently there is no way to stop the individual from producing that spike protein forever. There is no ‘off’ switch, at least until now.
The study described a method of turning off the production of the spike protein.
“…the longevity of the encapsulated mRNA along with unlimited production of the damaging and potentially lethal Spike (S) protein call for strategies to mitigate potential adverse effects,” the study said in the ‘Abstract’ section. “Here, we explore the potential of small interfering RNA (siRNA) and ribonuclease targeting chimeras (RIBOTACs) as promising solutions to target, inactivate, and degrade residual and persistent vaccine mRNA, thereby potentially preventing uncontrolled Spike protein production and reducing toxicity. The targeted nature of siRNA and RIBOTACs allows for precise intervention, offering a path to prevent and mitigate adverse events of mRNA-based therapies.”
BREAKING – Our new study finds promising methods to deactivate mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and shut off spike protein production.
— McCullough Foundation (@McCulloughFund) May 31, 2024
Small interfering RNA (siRNA) and ribonuclease targeting chimeras (RIBOTACs) are promising solutions to target, inactivate, and degrade residual and… pic.twitter.com/eBpRW0zygo
The study detailed the method the researchers proposed to turn off the mutagenic effects of the Covid vaccines in the ‘siRNA and RIBOTAC Applications’ section.
The researchers also provided a graphical depiction of their proposed novel treatment.
Due to foreign messenger RNA being easily broken down by the body, Moderna (who developed the mRNA Covid vaccine which Pfizer copied and got sued for) devised a method of encapsulating the mRNA payload within a lipid nanoparticle which allowed it’s transport into the cell’s ribosomes. The study describes how many different bodily systems the exotic mRNA vaccine technology had to overcome in order to alter the human genome.
“Prior to the authorization of the Moderna (mRNA-1273) and Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) mRNA vaccines in 2020, numerous challenges were addressed to circumvent inherent limitations of mRNA technology. Although researchers previously demonstrated that nucleic acid could be encapsulated and successfully delivered via polymer particles, the advent of mRNA as an effective therapeutic agent required the mitigation of mRNA instability and immunogenicity as well as the ability of mRNA to cross multiple barriers [1, 2]. Even when mRNAs evade nucleases in the extracellular space and target cells, most of the mRNAs become trapped in endosomes and are subsequently degraded [3]. Additionally, endocytosis of exogenous mRNA can induce pattern-recognition receptor-mediated immunogenicity with subsequent inhibition of mRNA translation and reduced mRNA stability [4-8]. Furthermore, efficient mRNA delivery is hampered by the negative charges of the mRNA and the cell membrane[2]. Administered mRNA can also be removed by macrophage phagocytosis or through renal filtration[2],” the study said in the ‘Introduction’ section.
The researches discussed the prevalence of mRNA distribution in the vaccinated’s bodies.
“Research by Pardi et al. using a murine model demonstrates that LNP-encapsulated mRNAs injected subcutaneously, intramuscularly, or intradermally translate for up to 10 days [44]. Surprisingly, full length or fragments of vaccine SARS-CoV-2 Spike mRNA were observed in 9.3% of patients’ blood up to 28 days following administration of the mRNA-1273 or BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine [45]. The authors surmise that the mRNA detected in plasma is encased within LNPs since naked mRNA would rapidly degrade. Similarly, vaccine mRNA was observed in the germinal centers of lymph nodes 60 days after the second dose of mRNA-1273 or BNT162b2 was administered [46]. Furthermore, a study by Hanna et al. substantiates earlier findings that vaccine mRNA leaves the injection site to distribute systemically. The breast milk of 13 lactating women who had received either the BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccine was assessed for vaccine mRNA. Trace amounts of vaccine mRNA which displayed reduced integrity were detected in some breast milk samples up to 45h post-vaccination [47],” the study said in the ‘Detection of Vaccine mRNA In Vivo‘ section.
The Covid shots are known to increase in lethality after repeated doses and double the death rate of Covid patients, yet the death rate is still higher than what is reported, increase Covid infection rates, result in insane and gross turbocancers, reproductive destruction, cause miscarriages, paralyzation, tinnitus, increased excess death rates, autoimmune disorders in the thyroid, as well as deadly headaches, seizures and heart inflammation including in children, while also causing the vaccinated people’s skin to ‘erupt’, in addition to a multitude of serious ailments seen in massive population studies and contain hundreds of times the allowable levels of DNA contamination leading to mutagenic effects, contaminating the blood supply, as well as permanently altering the DNA of the vaccinated and their offspring while being expected to kill people for a very long time into the future.
In the U.S. the CDC recommends all Americans receive their Covid shot and that young children receive extra, while Canada recommends another Covid shot for the pregnant, indigenous, ‘racialized’ & ‘equity-deserving’.
We Are In The Middle Of The Greatest Economic War In History, Warns Daniel Estulin
Panic Mode! White House & Media Rush To Claim Biden DID NOT Freeze Onstage With Obama
Joe Biden awkwardly froze onstage over the weekend, and the entire political establishment is freaking out.
Basically telling their gaslit supporters to not believe their own eyes, Democrats online are claiming Biden’s bizarre freeze “did not happen.”
Watch the original video clip below, showing Barack Obama grab Biden’s hand to escort him offstage after the senile Democrat paused for almost ten seconds.
That’s a wrap on record-setting Democratic fundraiser for Joe Biden’s reelection campaign (netting $28M). Former President Barack Obama and President Joe Biden offer final waves to Peacock Theater crowd as Obama then grabs Biden’s hand to lead him offstage following 40-minute… pic.twitter.com/xbE2jf3jdz
— Chris Gardner (@chrissgardner) June 16, 2024
In unison, just about every pro-Biden influencer echoed the White House claim that Sleepy Joe didn’t suddenly freeze before being grabbed by Obama.
Trending Politics co-owner Collin Rugg listed six prominent Democrats pushing the narrative.
HAPPENING NOW: Left-wing influencers say the following video does *not* show Biden freezing up and being led off stage by Obama.
— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) June 17, 2024
David Hogg: “For the record this did not happen and is a total lie.”
Harry Sisson: “MAGA IS LYING AGAIN. The new lie is that Biden had to be “led off… pic.twitter.com/CXMVoVywV3
The Biden White House is calling the video a “cheap fake,” and alleging it was “deceptively edited.”
It turns out the footage being shared by Democrats is the video with deceptive editing as the camera angle jumps to a far away shot in the middle of Biden’s freeze.
?MAGA IS LYING AGAIN
— Harry Sisson (@harryjsisson) June 16, 2024
The new lie is that Biden had to be “led off stage” by Obama and that he “froze” but that is COMPLETELY FALSE! This video shows what actually happened and is not some selectively edited garbage. The lies don’t stop from MAGA. pic.twitter.com/7LmnVL0kYW
The political establishment will have its hands full trying to cover for the bumbling dolt in office as the 2024 presidential election approaches, and it would likely be impossible to run cover for another four years.
CNN: America Is A Democracy, Not A Constitutional Republic!
CNN aired a ridiculous “news” segment this weekend, telling its gullible audience the United States is a Democracy and that those who claim it’s a constitutional republic are just MAGA conspiracy theorists.
The outlet sent a European reporter to Donald Trump rallies only to be shocked that his supporters consistently pointed out the nation is a constitutional republic and not a democracy.
CNN Reporter Claims Trump Supporters Calling America A Republic Is ‘An Attack On Democracy’ pic.twitter.com/XQP3AQ8KY9
— Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) June 17, 2024
The report showed several pro-Trump people expressing the notion America is a constitutional republic, before telling viewers, “But for centuries, America has celebrated its democracy.”
Next, CNN alleged, “Some Republicans and pro-Trump media are pushing the idea that America is not a democracy.”
A leftist author named Anne Applebaum told the outlet, “America is a democracy. It was founded as a democracy,” and claimed Trump is behind the idea that the nation is a constitutional republic.
“Honestly, the word democracy and the word republic have often been used interchangeably. There isn’t a meaningful difference between them,” Applebaum stated.
This claim comes from the same group of people who cannot define the word “woman” and say men can be women capable of giving birth.
In reality, the words do have a meaningful difference and it can even be seen in the titles of today’s two largest American political parties.
The Democratic Party leans more towards recognizing the democracy side of U.S. government while the Republican Party is supposed to stand for The Republic.
The CNN segment was a bizarre example of mainstream revisionist history as the word “democracy” does not even appear in the the Declaration of Independence or U.S. Constitution.
The American Founding Fathers were quite wary of democracies as they can give the majority, or the mob, too much power over minority groups.
One of the most common critical takes on democracy is that it “is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.”
John Adams wrote in 1814, “Remember Democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes exhausts and murders itself. There never was a Democracy Yet, that did not commit suicide.”
The Bill of Rights and U.S. Constitution were carefully crafted to give We The People control of the republic in ways a true democracy could never assure.
The objective of the CNN hit piece was to convince viewers Donald Trump and his supporters will “attack democracy” because they don’t believe it exists.
Meanwhile, the people who claim the constitutional republic doesn’t exist are defiling the American Constitution.
Applebaum said she was unsure why there was a debate about how to define the American government before laughably saying, “I think they mean, ‘We want Donald Trump to be able to do whatever he wants.’”
The outlet’s Irish reporter Donie O’Sullivan told viewers a constitutional republic “is a form of democracy” and that the MAGA crowd is engaging in “an attack on democracy.”
Remember, the Pledge of Allegiance declares allegiance “to my Flag and
to the Republic for which it stands,” not the democracy.
Why do Drag Queens Never Want to Read Stories to the Elderly?
(LifeSiteNews) — Whenever some grifter brings up the issue of female impersonators reading to children, you might consider asking, “Why do they never read stories to the elderly?”
These men in makeup as freakish parodies of women insist on reading to children. Very young children at that. Nurseries and junior schools are the usual venues. They don’t do this in care homes for our lonely, isolated grandparents.
Never prisons, hospital wards, hospices. Why do they never read to prisoners – a literal captive audience? Why not entertain the sick, or bring “trans joy” to the terminally ill?
Why is it always little children?
There is no “war veterans story hour.” There is not even a basic literacy initiative. The point is not the stories. Nor is it to spread the pleasure of reading. The point is the normalization of the presence of people such as this in the company of children.
What is happening about this?
Anatomy of a grift
Grifting is a term applied to an issue milked for cash. Some grifters you like, some you don’t.
The pro-trans grift is about framing their extreme sexual identitarianism as a liberation struggle from dark forces of repression.
The anti-trans grift is about selling you descriptions of this while remaining silent about the cause and the cure.
If this seems unkind, ask yourself whether the people whose names you associate with being pro- or anti-trans would still have this income – and audience – if the problem could be solved.
Like therapy, the grifters do not provide a cure. Both the producer and the consumer come to depend on the continued production of the product.
Neither pro- nor con-men on the trans issue want it to change. This would kill their influence.
Neither the yeas nor the nays ever talk about where the transgender cult came from. If you do not know the cause, you can only describe the effects.
Complaining about effects while remaining ignorant of causes is the hallmark of “conservatives.”
This is why none of them have ever reversed any of these devastating social processes. They do not understand where they come from, and so they cannot make them go away.
Instead, they monetize complaining about them, until this happens:
READ: LGBT ‘Pride Month’ is not about celebrating, it’s about asserting dominance over the culture
Everything about the trans cult is controversial. The reason they want to read to your children – often without your knowledge, presence, or permission – is because they are recruiting them.
The trans cult is a sales cult. It is pitching a product through placement and advertising. This is known as “social contagion.” It is a viral phenomenon spread through online and offline contact.
What is that product? Where does it come from?
The first transgender clinic was founded by the man who also co-founded the world’s first “gay rights” organization. Magnus Hirschfeld’s pot of gold is what you find at the birth of the rainbow movement.
Contrary to popular conservative wisdom, the “T” in LGBT is not a recent addition. The “trans” cult has been there almost since the beginning. The rainbow has always been “queer” – promoting an endless spectrum of sexually extremist identities. It has always used the language of human rights, promoted through the vehicle of scientific progress, to secure its claims for normalization.
In 1896 Hirschfeld began the first study of its kind – “The Homosexuality of Men and Women.”
In the following year he co-founded the Scientific Humanitarian Committee – whose purpose was to repeal laws against homosexuality and promote its political and social liberation.
The committee had a motto: “Justice through science.”
This book about Hirschfeld examines his role in early 20th century homosexualism. It opens with a quote from critical theorist and pedophile sex tourist Michel Foucault, and it says the motto reflected Hirschfeld’s belief that a better scientific understanding of homosexuality would eliminate social hostility toward homosexuals.
To promote this “understanding,” Hirschfeld is celebrated in modern Berlin with his own Magnus Hirschfeld Day, along with three monuments to him and a street named in his honor.
Magnus Hirschfeld, “soul of the queer community” – from the Magnus Hirschfeld Day website, 2024
In May 2024, the German government downgraded the criminalization of child pornography. In 2013, the then-leader of the German Green Party said he “regretted” supporting a move to decriminalize sex with children. Here is a Green Party leaflet from Berlin in 2021, which the party said displayed its “vision” for the future of the capital of Germany.
READ: Pedophile advocacy group praises Germany’s new law softening punishment for child pornography
In 1919 Magnus Hirschfeld opened the Institute for Sexual Science in Weimar Berlin. Its motto, above its door, was also “Justice Through Science.”
Hirschfeld performed “pioneering” penectomies and orchidectomies – removing men’s genitals in the lucrative and near unique provision of early “gender affirming care.”
He kept an extensive library of explicit material, including over a thousand images displaying the craze of “Lustmord” – sexually charged murder and corpse mutilation.
Homosexual boy lovers such as the British writer Christopher Isherwood would lodge at the institute. Isherwood’s fond memories of a Berlin which for him, “was about boys,” would later be adapted in the popular musical Cabaret. This musical presents Weimar Berlin as a sexual paradise lost, destroyed by irrational hatred.
This is, of course, an example of the cultural power of rendering extreme sexual degradation as popular entertainment. It was formerly reserved for women, and for men who like musicals.
Now it is for children.
Hirschfeld’s institute was forcibly closed in 1933. The books you see being burned in those iconic images are mainly pictures of the bonfire of his obscene library, torched in the Opernplatz in May 1933.
I warned you it was controversial.
Critical mass
The trans cult is an industry transmitted through the same means as any other mass market product. Ambassadors greet the target consumers. Advertising or propaganda saturates their public spaces. Schools, hospitals, government buildings, military installations, supermarkets, bus shelters, online video adverts, social media and, of course, printed books are all sites of this promotional campaign.
Every cult has a belief system. The one behind the trans cult and that of the rainbow movement is critical theory.
This is the liturgy of progressives. Its mass is the collective celebration of the systematic destruction of all social norms. What is being criticized is normal life and everything on which it relies.
Critical theory is the creed of replacing culture with crisis. It has given us critical race theory, which has manufactured and mobilized the grievances of “people of color” in a permanent declaration of war on society.
It has also gifted us queer theory, which manufactures and mobilizes sexual identities in a similar declaration of war – on all social norms, which it regards as oppressive taboos.
Especially that one.
Judith Butler, perhaps the greatest living champion of this campaign, has admitted on camera that her promotion of queer theory saw her correctly labeled as an advocate for pedophilia.
“I was identified as a threat against children and someone who provides license to pedophiles. That is true.”
“I was identified as a threat against children and someone who provides license to pedophiles. That is true.” — Judith Butler, Queer Literary Theorist and infamous antisemite. pic.twitter.com/JCmdtVelVJ
— Kevin (@RochesterNY585) June 7, 2024
How is this possible? Professor Derrick Jensen once outraged a class of “woke” students with the following brief explanation of the long standing relationship between critical and queer theory, its politics, and pedophilia.
Queer theory is rooted in pedophilia.
— Tiffany Justice (@4TiffanyJustice) January 27, 2024
Meet professor Derrick Jensen as he introduces Queer Theory Pedophilia Jeopardy.
Link to my full interview with Derrick https://t.co/Ujz5oCl2A7 pic.twitter.com/EKvjyLjcUZ
The reason they never read to the elderly is obvious. Weimar Berlin – the birthplace of the rainbow movement – was home to an estimated 300 child sex gangs. Children of all ages were sold for sex in bars notorious for the supply of every sexual demand. Catalogs of these venues and their menus are preserved in celebratory collections such as that of Mel Gordon’s “Voluptuous Panic.”
This is how the rainbow ends. It is propelled by hysterical talk of “rights” and the invocation of a captive “science” towards the total liberation of humanity from any morality whatsoever, sexual or otherwise. It is directly aimed at the destruction of the worship of God and the vandalism of His creation.
Grifters will never talk about the origins or aims of the rainbow movement. They are obvious and well documented.
There is no mention of Hirschfeld on James Esses’ blog, for example:
The transgender industry is now a rich and powerful lobby in itself. It is spearheaded by billionaires such as the Pritzkers, and Martin Rothblatt – whose grotesque ambitions include the creation of a “trans religion.”
Jennifer Bilek has documented the sponsorship of “scientific” and “medical” research by the Pritzkers in U.S. medical schools and universities, as well as the involvement of wealthy philanthropists such as George Soros.
Rothblatt is the owner of Sirius Radio, and has been celebrated as “Female CEO of the Year.”
With enormous financial backing, and over a century of “justice through science,” the means of the end of the rainbow are more powerful than ever.
What is the goal of this movement, whose progressive pinnacle is the trans cult?
It is the transcendence of creation and its divinely ordained sanctity. They want to normalize their normlessness – so that it becomes the new normal.
Why do they want to read to your children? Children are the future.
What kind of future do they want for your children?
They have told you themselves.
Popular trans cult symbol, as displayed here by “Ruth Pearce,” a former adviser to the U.K.’s National Health Service and the U.K. School of Nursing and Midwifery.
It is time to stop talking about the means of the rainbow. It is time to start talking about where it ends.
If you would like to know more about the Weimar origins of the Rainbow Movement, the transmission of the trans cult, the transitioning of our culture, and the transhuman“religion,” you can follow these links to my reports on Substack.