Transgender Double Murder Suspect Captured After Lengthy Manhunt
Colling Bailey, a biological man who now identifies as transgender “female” Mia Bailey, was arrested by Utah police on Wednesday in connection with a disturbing double homicide.
Police in Utah just spent nearly 24 hours searching for a mentally ill trans person who allegedly kiIIed his parents.
This story barely made it to the MSM.
We urgently need to have a national conversation about the epidemic of trans violence before more innocent people get… https://t.co/wUr90R5Txe— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) June 19, 2024
On Tuesday evening, the Washington City Police Department was notified about gunshots ringing out in a nearby neighborhood.
A man and woman, reportedly Bailey’s parents, were found dead in the home with gunshot wounds.
A police statement explained:
“Washington City Police Officers arrived on scene and entered the residence through the front door. Upon entry into the home, two deceased adults (one female and one male) were located inside from apparent gunshot wounds. Officers on scene attempted life saving efforts on the two victims but efforts were unsuccessful. Upon searching the home further, no other victims and no suspects were located. From the initial investigation, it was apparent a double homicide had occurred.”
Police engaged in an hours-long manhunt for Bailey and eventually captured the suspect Wednesday morning.
A local Fox News crew filmed as officers took Bailey into custody.
After a massive manhunt police in Utah have taken Collin Bailey into custody.
— Snowflake_News (@Snowflake_News) June 19, 2024
Collin is a “trans-identified” male who was on the run in connection to a double homicide at a home in Washington County, Utah.
Both police and media have referred to Collin Troy Bailey, who also goes… pic.twitter.com/lz8LVW8ij3
Lt. Kory Klotz with the Washington City Police Department said a gun was recovered from Bailey during the arrest.
The tragic incident takes place as transgender violence appears to be exploding globally.
See just a few recent headlines for more information:
- Breaking: Police Arrest Trans Student For Planning Multi-School Shooting
- Nashville Journalist Faces Jail Time Over Trans School Shooter Manifesto Leak
- Germany: Transgender Refugee Arrested for Killing Syrian Guard at Asylum Center
- Breaking: Trans Activist Arrested After Stabbing Spree in Massachusetts
- Transgender Convicted of Murder & Rape Files Lawsuit Demanding to be Released Into General Population of Women’s Prison
Russia Rescues Hundreds of Adrenochrome Victims Destined for Washington D.C.
Russian President Vladimir Putin has vowed to dismantle the adrenochrome supply chain as news breaks that Russian forces have liberated 50 imprisoned, emaciated children from an “adrenochrome farm” near Shostka, Ukraine. Russian special forces also […]
The post Russia Rescues Hundreds of Adrenochrome Victims Destined for Washington D.C. appeared first on The People’s Voice.
Food Corruption: Fake Meat, GMOs, and Beyond
In my last three articles, we examined the global war on farmers, the culprits behind the agenda, and the tactics used to prepare the public for the destruction of our food freedom. Today we will cover some of the projects and products that will be used to take away your right to access healthy foods.
Most readers are likely familiar with GMOs and how genetically modified organisms have been shown to cause significant health problems, how they have ruined the lives of independent farmers who are sued after their land is involuntarily contaminated by Monsanto seeds, and how glyphosate use has risen thanks to Roundup Ready GMO crops. Unfortunately, corruption of the food supply is advancing far beyond this.
DARPA, the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, has granted millions of dollars to researchers to turn military plastic waste into a bacterial protein powder that can be fed to humans.
You are surely familiar with Bill Gates-funded fake meats like Impossible Burgers, made of carcinogenic GMO soy and neurotoxins like hexane and MSG, and which have tested positive for high levels of glyphosate.
Many Americans are not aware that there are already genetically modified animals in our food supply. Genetically modified pigs, cows, and salmon have all been approved for sale in the US. The regulatory process for their approval has been dramatically shortened. If you order salmon at a restaurant or other food establishment rather than buying it retail, there is no requirement to inform you that you are eating a frankenfood.
If genetically engineered franken-salmon sounds appetizing, you’re sure to love Aanika Biosciences’ genetically engineered bacterial spores containing DNA “barcodes” which are applied to produce. These cannot be removed by being washed, boiled, fried, microwaved, or steamed, and will make food traceable from the field to your sewer so tests of your local sewage will reveal what the local population is eating. There is no labeling requirement to notify you which produce has been sprayed with these genetically-modified spores. Given the USDA’s obsession with food tracking and surveillance, there is a very real possibility they will try to mandate use of such spores, just as they are currently mandating RFID chips on cattle for traceability. If you think surveilling sewage sounds outlandish, realize that it became common practice during Covid as a means of determining locations of outbreaks and justifying further lockdowns. It is now being used to justify agricultural crackdowns in the name of H5N1, the avian flu virus.
Of course, we have the famous Eat The Bugs agenda. In Europe, multiple insects have been approved for human consumption including mealworms, house crickets, and migratory locusts. In low enough levels, companies don’t even need to report it as an ingredient on food labels. According to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the European Union, “Insects as food emerge as an especially relevant issue in the twenty-first century due to the rising cost of animal protein, food insecurity, environmental pressures, population growth and increasing demand for protein among the middle classes…Thus, alternative solutions to conventional livestock need to be found. The consumption of insects therefore contributes positively to the environment and to health and livelihoods.”
Pay no attention to the fact that these same governments’ deliberate policies create the problem they claim to solve. It’s the problem-reaction-solution strategy again. Insect-based edibles are now available in the UK, Canada, and the US as well.
One can argue that this is all well and good as long as we aren’t forced to eat it, and have informed consent on whether or not it’s on our plates. But just as the groundwork for the Covid regime was laid in advance, and the products and services used to control the population were developed before they were made mandatory, the same is true here, and the ploys to remove your food choice have already begun.
New York City and London have begun tracking what foods their residents buy. They have committed to cutting how much meat can be served in schools and hospitals as part of a sweeping initiative to achieve a 33% reduction in carbon emissions from food by 2030. The city states that most of these emissions are due to “meat, poultry, fish, dairy, and eggs.”
Credit card companies will hand over food purchase data to the city so they can make their calculations – American Express is an open partner in this project. New York City Mayor Eric Adams stated that “All food is not created equal. The vast majority of food that is contributing to our emission crisis lies in meat and dairy products…It is easy to talk about the emissions that are coming from buildings and how it impacts our environment, but we now have to talk about beef. And I don’t know if people are ready for this conversation.”
This program will not be limited to New York and London. C40 Cities, the organization behind the push for 15-minute cities, has partnered with municipalities worldwide to track the consumption of their residents. Other American cities that have signed on to the C40 project include Philadelphia, Austin, Chicago, Miami, Boston, Los Angeles, Houston, Phoenix, Portland, San Francisco, Washington, DC, and Seattle. The premise behind the project is based on a report by Arup Group, a World Economic Forum affiliate funded by the Rockefeller Foundation. C40 cities have set an “ambitious target”: by 2030, their residents should have no meat, no dairy, no private cars, be allowed to buy only 3 new items of clothing per year, and be allowed just one short-haul flight every 3 years. You will own nothing and be happy.
Perhaps you’ll be one of the lucky few who can still afford meat, dairy, fish, and fresh vegetables. Unfortunately, even those will be polluted if the technocrats get their way. You have probably heard conflicting stories on whether or not there are mRNA vaccines in our food and whether or not these can be transmitted to you when you eat them.
In my next article, we will dig in to uncover the truth about vaccines in the food supply.
MUST WATCH: Dr. David Martin Interview — U.S. Gov. Is Coordinating A Depopulation Program Against The World
The Problem With Juneteenth
Today is Juneteenth. One hundred fifty-nine years ago, on June 19, 1865, Major General Gordon Granger arrived in Texas and declared that all slaves in the state were free. The following year, in 1866, residents of the town where Granger had issued the order celebrated the anniversary as “Jubilee Day.” Eventually, the name changed to Juneteenth, and in 1979, it became a Texas state holiday. Then, in 2021, President Joe Biden signed a bill designating Juneteenth as a federal holiday.
The West’s abolition of chattel slavery was one of the greatest victories for liberty in our civilization’s history. Using an anniversary like today to celebrate the achievement and reflect on why it was necessary in the first place—or how it could have come about better—should be a rare point of unity in today’s politically fractured America.
But in the years since Biden signed the so-called Juneteenth National Independence Day Act, the holiday has become increasingly co-opted by progressives in media, academia, and politics as a way to push for radical policies like collective reparations or the exclusion of white people from celebrations.
Because of that, most of the rhetoric we see from those promoting Juneteenth sidesteps the actual issue of slavery. They do so because adherents of modern progressivism do not actually believe in self-ownership, the antithesis of slavery.
Only libertarians have a consistent commitment to self-ownership. We believe that nobody has the right to another’s labor. Nobody can justly claim ownership over another’s body or the fruits of their labor. Progressives do not believe this.
Modern American progressivism can be defined by its commitment to what are called positive rights. Where negative rights entail an obligation not to do something, like murder or steal, positive rights refer to the supposed right to be provided with something, like education or healthcare. When backed by the force of law, positive rights produce a legal system where electing not to use your labor toward some specific end is tantamount to a rights violation—which, therefore, warrants the use of force to compel that labor involuntarily.
These days, the coercion underlying progressive programs is shifted from the service provider to the working professionals taxed to pay for them. The average American works the equivalent of thirty-eight days a year exclusively to fund government programs. For those with higher incomes, that number is closer to sixty-five days. The only problem progressives have with this violent expropriation of wealth through taxation is that there’s not enough of it.
It is ironic that Americans are forced to work to fund a paid day off for federal employees to celebrate the end of involuntary labor. Much more absurd, however, is that much of our taxed income these days is—with the enthusiastic support of the progressive establishment—being sent to the Ukrainian government, which is quite literally enslaving young men and forcing them to fight against the Russians.
And, although it is not active at the moment, the House of Representatives recently passed a bill to automatically register young men for the draft with little to no pushback from progressives.
While detailing the brutality of slavery in colonial Virginia, Murray Rothbard wrote that the essence of slavery is that “human beings, with their inherent freedom of will, with individual desires and convictions and purposes, are used as capital, as tools for the benefit of their master. The slave is therefore habitually forced into types and degrees of work that he would not have freely undertaken.”
Progressives have demonstrated, through action and rhetoric, that they do not actually find the essence of slavery to be unjust. Their opposition to American chattel slavery is genuine, but it tends to boil down to it being racist.
Only libertarians have a consistent, principled, and ongoing opposition to slavery in all its forms and degrees. The abolition of chattel slavery was a major triumph for human liberty that’s worth commemorating. But we have a lot further to go—thanks in no small part to those most aggressively celebrating today.
MUST WATCH: Dr. David Martin Interview — U.S. Gov. Is Coordinating A Depopulation Program Against The World
PANIC: Biden Campaign Creates Special Task Force to Mitigate ‘Cheap Fake’ Videos
The Biden campaign has reportedly established a special task force to mitigate the impact of embarrassing real videos of Joe Biden it dubbed “cheap fakes.”
The White House and media have doubled down on claiming recent clips of Joe Biden wandering off at the G7 Summit and Obama grabbing his arm to escort him offstage are “deepfakes” and “manipulated” videos.
Now, the Biden camp has created a task force specifically to hamper the viral impact these kinds of clips are making in the 2024 election landscape and called on social media companies to ramp up their censorship efforts.
“A Biden official said the campaign has established a taskforce to mitigate the risks posed by AI and cheap fakes, but stressed that the responsibility rests with social media platforms and news companies,” Politico reported Tuesday.
“Voters deserve accurate information to inform their choice this November and our campaign will be vigilant in calling out these lies when we see them,” Biden campaign spokesperson Mia Ehrenberg told the outlet.
“We hope media organizations and others with influential platforms follow our lead,” she added.
Former Obama White House communications director Dan Pfeiffer also stressed Joe Biden’s performance in his upcoming debate with Trump will prove to be much more critical for his reelection chances than short viral clips.
“Ultimately how the President performs in high-profile moments like the debates will be exponentially more impactful than some clips circulating on TikTok,” he said.
Social media users have been having a field day calling out the left’s next-level gaslighting, mocking their desperation and re-sharing older clips of Biden falling down, stumbling, and speaking incoherently.
Who did this ??? @PressSec pic.twitter.com/KCN27tdLnY
— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) June 19, 2024
Wow look at these “deep fakes” and “cheap fakes” and “manipulated” videos of Biden’s gaffes and mumblings! Why would Republicans do this?!
— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) June 19, 2024
It would be really bad if everyone tagged @PressSec asking her about this!! pic.twitter.com/qCJ1jqo3j3
Here’s another video of Biden that the media propagandists would claim is a cheap fake. pic.twitter.com/a0H7l7cN8S
— MAZE (@mazemoore) June 18, 2024
“they were cheap fakes” ???
— drefanzor memes (@drefanzor) June 17, 2024
Karine Jean-Pierre pic.twitter.com/kuKSp1xrW2
CHEAP FAKE ALERT ?
— Wesley Hunt (@WesleyHuntTX) June 19, 2024
KJP claimed that the videos of Joe Biden freezing are “cheap fakes” and “manipulated.”
Someone in the White House Press corps should ask if it includes these. pic.twitter.com/60Ndv19wNz
The Cheap Fake Hoax pic.twitter.com/Tpu5XeAxzh
— Phantom Shadow (@Fuknutz) June 19, 2024
The White House will call this a “cheap fake”. pic.twitter.com/Tqz2Uc9Xbs
— Cali-Florida Patriot ??? (@CaliPatriot20) June 18, 2024
meme pic.twitter.com/CgidJC0fkI
— INFOWARS (@infowars) June 18, 2024
— johnny maga (@_johnnymaga) June 19, 2024
Biden’s little censorship task force certainly has their work cut out for them.
AI: “Existential Crisis” or Excuse for Cronyism?
Several months ago, I was on a long car trip with my dad, and we listened to a podcast that gave some commentary on the following headlines from the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal: “AI Poses ‘Risk of Extinction,’ Industry Leaders Warn” and “AI Poses ‘Risk of Extinction’ on Par with Pandemics and Nuclear War, Tech Executives Warn.”
Obviously, this was in the wake of new AI technologies like ChatGPT and others. This is also not a new issue. In 2017, the Wall Street Journal also published “Protecting Against AI’s Existential Threat.” Of course, AI has been impressively more developed recently, bringing the usual reactions—assumptions that this technology will totally change everything, amused interest, reasonable concerns (e.g., students cheating), and the typical hand-wringing.
All this was in response to a recent statement from the Center for AI Safety, who posted an open letter with the following warning: “Mitigating the risk of extinction from AI should be a global priority alongside other societal-scale risks such as pandemics and nuclear war.” As these claims were made, even by creators of the technologies, I had a sneaking suspicion that I already knew what these AI companies wanted: cronyism. Not long after that, my suspicions were confirmed by the inevitable call for that one, vague, seemingly magical word that everybody seems to demand in situations like these. That word is “regulation.”
Arguing a similar point soon after the announcement of this “existential threat,” another writer from the Wall Street Journal perceptively wrote an article titled, “AI is the Technocratic Elite’s New Excuse for a Power Grab.” That said, while there is certainly a penchant for the technocratic elite to form and expand bureaucracies in order to regulate, it is worth mentioning that very often these very companies are themselves the biggest proponents of government regulation of their industries.
Why would private firms ever want cumbersome government regulation? The answer is cronyism. Cronyism, crony capitalism, “crapitalism,” corporatism, managed capitalism, a “mixed” economy, or fascism are different titles for the same concept. Whatever the designation, it is a public-private partnership that employs the powers of the state to grant special legal privilege to non-State entities for their mutual benefit at the expense of the consumer/taxpayer.
Private businesses and government are often not enemies but very comfortable friends. More than that, their working together is always in the name of protecting the consumer/taxpayer. Depending on their ideology, people might see themselves teaming up with business against the government or teaming up with government against business, but they rarely recognize that there is a third option—government and business teaming up against the consumer/taxpayer.
By inviting “regulation,” private firms can use the legal apparatus of the government to limit competition, raise barriers to entry for competitors, restrict output for higher prices, and shift the costs of “health and safety” standards to the taxpayers. These are options that businesses and industries would never have save an alliance with the state. The taxpayers will pay the government, via bureaucratic agencies, to inspect and maintain certain standards for businesses, which removes the costs of these standards from the business, subsidizes their operations, and places them on the taxpayer. Oddly enough, this regulative bureaucratic apparatus can simultaneously be burdensome by hampering the productive aspects of a business, assistive in providing for costs to businesses and industries that they would otherwise have to bear, and incompetent in the goal of protecting consumers.
A costly regulatory burden for competitors, an attempt to capture the market, movement toward monopolization, the government as enforcer, and getting the consumer/taxpayer to pay for bureaucracies to write more regulations and inspect standards: What business wouldn’t at least be tempted?
Cronyism has a long history. In fact, monopoly used to mean exclusive legal grants of government privilege to certain companies, not arbitrary standards like firm size, number of firms, or market share. Cronyism has also had a long history in the United States, especially since the Progressive era (ca. 1890–1920). We are often told that the Progressive era involved the government intervening to stop monopoly when the truth is precisely the opposite—the government intervened with a new bureaucratic technocracy, usually at the request of private firms, to stifle competition and impose monopoly.
This took place in all sorts of areas, such as meatpacking, insurance, textiles, money and banking, etc. It turned out, according to G. Edward Griffin, that use of the word “reform” would be enough: “The American people are suckers for the word ‘reform.’ You just put that into any corrupt piece of legislation, call it ‘reform’ and people say ‘Oh, I’m all for “reform,”’ and so they vote for it or accept it.”
Furthermore, while the tendency in America was toward competition, this was unacceptable to many businesses who invited and embraced new “regulations” and “reforms.” Writes historian Gabriel Kolko, “Ironically, contrary to the consensus of historians, it was not the existence of monopoly that caused the federal government to intervene in the economy, but the lack of it.” The simple solution was, “Monopoly could be put over in the name of opposition to monopoly!” The same word was used, but the content could be the opposite. Government, itself a monopoly, was to monopolize industries because, if it didn’t, monopolies might result!Many vaguely call for “regulation” because they may not know what else to ask for whenever they see a problem, but often businesses call for it to use the governmental apparatus to their benefit at the expense of the consumer/taxpayer.
As the new and growing AI industry develops, it should be no surprise that they want “regulation.” It is probably not that they really believe that the AI technology they produce is a literal threat to human existence, but that, by leaning into the scaremongering and the statist non sequitur, they can form a cozy relationship with the government first and legally limit competition to their benefit. The American people are suckers for “reform.”