Media Outlets Are Already Calling for Online 2024 Election Censorship
The page has only just been turned on 2023 and already the narrative that much policing of online speech will be vital for 2024, an election year, has already stirred.
The legacy media outlet The Guardian, in its piece about Kate Starbird, has already complained that there may be less censorship ahead of the 2024 elections, and claimed that Rep. Jim Jordan’s committee’s reports on Big Tech-government censorship collusion are based on “outlandish claims.” This is ignoring the fact that an injunction was successfully placed on the Biden administration for its censorship pressure on Big Tech, a case that will be ruled on by The Supreme Court this year.
In an era where the policing of online speech is increasingly contentious, Kate Starbird’s role in combating what she terms election misinformation has placed her squarely in the midst of a heated debate. As a leading figure at the University of Washington’s Center for an Informed Public, Starbird has actively engaged in documenting what she and her team perceive as misinformation during the 2020 elections, particularly focusing on claims of voter fraud.
However, Starbird’s approach and her team’s actions have not been without controversy. Critics argue that their efforts amount to a form of censorship, infringing upon free speech. This criticism extends beyond Starbird’s team to a broader national trend, where researchers engaged in similar work face accusations of partisanship and censorship, challenging the principles of free expression.
Jim Jordan, chair of the House judiciary committee, has emerged as a key figure in opposing what he views as the overreach of these researchers. He has focused on investigating groups and individuals involved in counteracting misinformation, especially in the context of elections and Covid-19. Central to the controversy is the practice of working with government entities and flagging content to social media platforms, which some argue leads to undue censorship and violates First Amendment rights.
The debate over the role of anti-misinformation efforts has escalated beyond Congress, evidenced by lawsuits from the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana and from the state of Texas, along with two rightwing media companies. These legal actions challenge the alleged collaboration between the Biden administration, the Global Engagement Center, and social media companies, showing it as a constitutional breach.
Critics of Starbird’s and similar researchers’ work argue that labeling right-wing entities as primary purveyors of election lies is a biased approach that neglects the complexity of online discourse. They contend that such claims of misinformation often serve to silence dissenting voices rather than foster a balanced and open dialogue.
According to The Guardian piece, Starbird’s shift in terminology from “misinformation” to “rumors” could be seen by some as a strategic move to distance her work from the increasingly politicized nature of the term but one that could be even more contentions. The idea that rumors should be policed isn’t likely to go over well with those that are already tired of online censorship.
In a similar vein to The Guardian piece, in a New Year’s Eve episode of “Face The Nation,” CBS’s Senior Business and Technology Correspondent Jo-Ling Kent took her time to criticize Elon Musk’s X for allowing free speech. Kent notably highlighted the limitations placed on censorship due to the “arguments and protections of free speech.”
Kent criticized X for enabling figures like Alex Jones to regain a platform. “Elon Musk and his team have basically allowed the return of conspiracy theorists like Alex Jones, and they’ve also dramatically reduced the size of their Trust and Safety team,” Kent stated.
Kent also stated that, on platforms like Meta’s Facebook, “the reality here is that taking down all of this bad information has always been an impossible task on platforms of that size.” Despite describing it as impossible, Kent appears to suggest they should still try.
As has always been the case, false information during an election cycle is often rife. But in the online world, where most speech runs through a handful of Big Tech giants, the power and control over online discourse that these companies have is immense. A handful of companies have the power to affect elections and the play of democracy itself.
While even Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has admitted that the companies’ online censorship has been heavy-handed, and has resulted in truthful speech being suppressed, tech giants and largely legacy media outlets that once had a monopoly on information, continue to push for online censorship.
Pro Hamas Supporters Attempt to Bring Down Airplanes in NY, MSM Spins it as ‘Only Being Balloons’
Alex Jones breaks down the leftist pro-Hamas terrorist tactics in NY that could have brought down airplanes with ‘balloons.’
Don’t forget, Infowars relies on YOUR SUPPORT! To continue funding this independent operation, we urge you to visit the Infowars Store where you can fund the battle against globalism by purchasing great products such as dietary supplements, air and water filters, books, t-shirts, survival gear and much more.
Flashback: Sandra Bullock Discusses Injecting Baby Foreskin Into Face to Stay Young
Video of actress Sandra Bullock admitting her skin care routine involves injecting tissue from the foreskins of babies is going viral on social media as 2024 brings renewed interest in the bizarre rituals of the global elite.
The strange admission came during a 2018 interview on The Ellen Show, where the Hollywood A-lister described she maintains her youthful appearance by getting “penis facials,” in which a dermatologist micro-needles one’s face with the cells of foreskins evidently harvested from Korean babies.
“It’s like a little roller with these, some of you, I don’t think many of you know it. It pushes through the skin and ruptures the collagen and then boosts it,” Bullock explained to Degeneres, adding, “You look like a burn victim for a day, but then it’s, but then it pushes…”
I found it… here’s the interview with Sandra Bullock re: using baby’s blood and fetal tissue aka: Adrenochrome to keep looking young.
— D-Bark (@DBark012) January 2, 2024
Ellen DeGeneres is acting stupid like she doesn’t know what she’s talking about.
Notice the Epstein island looking backdrop and castle stripes? pic.twitter.com/n48upKZj7s
Ellen then cuts of Bullock asking, “What are you pushing into the skin?”
“Well, you push in whatever the facialist would like to insert into your pores,” Bullock coyly replies.
“But what is it?” Degeneres asks.
“It is an extraction from a, um, a piece of skin that came from a young person far, far away, and they somehow figured out how to extract,” Bullock says, carefully choosing her words.
“IT’S FORESKIN FROM A KOREAN BABY,” chimes in Ellen.
Bullock went on to promote the ghastly cosmetic procedure, saying, “I think when you see how good it is to your face, you too will run to your facialist and say, ‘Give me the penis.’”
I should’ve never asked Sandra Bullock about her skincare routine.
— Ellen DeGeneres (@EllenDeGeneres) May 17, 2018
Watch the full clip here: https://t.co/G9OAbKwMyo pic.twitter.com/SQJH2guB9J
A Guardian writer attempted the procedure later that year describing,
The procedure, popular in Hollywood celebrity circles, injects cells from a baby’s foreskin – specifically a South Korean baby’s foreskin – into the face. Sandra Bullock and Cate Blanchett are big fans. Just last month Kate Beckinsale had one, and said it was “amazing”. I was curious.
Asking why Korean babies are selected, one facialist told the writer “South Korea tends to be ahead of the curve with beauty treatments, and this treatment had been inspired by work there.”
Metro.co.uk at the time also gave more details on the skin treatment:
…When you look at the modern practice, it could be assumed she’s not literally rubbing recently-harvested foreskins on her face.
Yes, the penis facial is the catchy name for what’s professionally known as an EGF (epidermal growth factor) facial, which uses stem cells from the foreskins of circumcised Korean boys.
That bit is true, technically.
The cells work to encourage skin cells to turn over rapidly and regenerate, so they’re often used for brightening, exfoliating, and healing the skin – not all that dissimilar to enzyme facials, when you break it down.
And they’ve been around for a while – the treatments, that is.
Back in 1986, Rita Levi-Montalcini and Stanley Cohen’s discovery of EGF earned them the Nobel Prize and the compound was also shown to promote wound healing in clinical studies (which is probably why the beauty industry jumped onto the bandwagon in the quest for ageless skin).
When it comes to the origin of these foreskins these days, according to The Cut, one facialist said the cells are grown in a lab, ‘not continually harvested fresh from Korean male babies – the progenitor cells are cloned’.
However, yes, it is to be seriously noted there was once a time, not too long ago, when people were using the regularly-sourced (through means that aren’t clear) foreskins from young boys.
SkinMedica created one particular cream with EGF that was aforementioned touted by Oprah over a decade ago and in regards to the stem cells in question, the company says they were cultivated originally from the stem cells of a single baby foreskin 20 years ago.
So, while we cannot confirm where the stem cells of Sandra’s particular facial came from at the time, we can assume it was from cloned compounds taken decades ago.
The outlandish skin treatment certainly brings to mind the elite’s vampire-like quest to harvest the cells of young people in order to stay young.
One tech billionaire, 46-year-old Bryan Johnson, admits he uses his son as a “blood boy” to provide fresh blood for transfusions which he injects to stay young.
In 2022, Hollywood actress Megan Fox revealed that she and her rapper fiancé Machine Gun Kelly consume each other’s blood, however she claimed it was “for ritual purposes.”
Former fashion mogul Peter Nygard is on video with his former business partner Steve Powers talking about a company they created to replace DNA from white people inside the nucleus of eggs from African women to create what they call a genetically pure race.
Nygard also described how he wanted these black women to have abortions so he could use the fetal stem cells for “age-defying research.”
The masses are beginning to wake up to the depraved practices of the world’s elite and wealthy celebrities.
The globalists are increasing their attacks on Infowars and the stakes have never been higher!
Please consider donating and visit InfowarsStore.com for merch, nutraceuticals and survival gear.
Follow the author on X, Facebook, Gab, Minds, Truth Social and Gettr.
Slap On Wrist: DOJ Recommends Suspected Jan. 6 Provocateur Ray Epps Serve Six Months In Prison
The Biden Department of Justice is recommending suspected January 6th provocateur Ray Epps be handed a six-month prison sentence for his involvement in the debacle.
Filed on Tuesday, the DOJ sentencing memorandum claims Epps receiving a six-month sentence would be the “high end” of sentencing guidelines under the plea deal he reached with the feds.
BREAKING: The DOJ is recommending just six months in jail for Ray Epps, the only J6 defendant caught on camera telling people to go into the Capitol building.
— Greg Price (@greg_price11) January 2, 2024
They say that they gave him a plea deal because he cooperated with the FBI, tried to “descalate conflict” and was the… pic.twitter.com/K96HHz8E7v
The document explains Epps turned himself in to the FBI within two days of learning he was on their “watch list,” and that he cooperated with the Bureau and Congress by sitting down for interviews.
Epps also allegedly “engaged in at least five efforts on January 6 to de-escalate conflict and avoid violence between rioters and police officers.”
Of course, Epps was documented telling individuals “we need to go into the Capitol” on Jan. 5th and, “We’re here to storm the capitol,” on Jan. 6th.
The suspected government informant or asset also texted his nephew about the events at the Capitol, writing, “I was in the front with a few others. I also orchestrated it.”
Continuing its bizarre list of why it took it easy on Epps, the DOJ states, “He also expressed what appears to be sincere remorse” and “Epps has been the target of a false and widespread conspiracy theory that he was an undercover government agent on January 6.”
It’s worth noting the document is basically declaring Epps was not a government asset despite the fact the FBI refused to say as much in 2022 when asked point-blank by GOP Senator Ted Cruz of Texas.
Is Ray Epps a Fed?
— DirkDiggler (@Muffhugger) July 12, 2023
FBI Director: “I cannot answer that question” pic.twitter.com/TgdvurJ43J
Meanwhile, loads of prominent J6ers were hit with insanely long prison sentences, such as Purple Heart recipient Joe Biggs getting 17 years, Oath Keepers founder Stewart Rhodes’ 18-year punishment and Proud Boys Chairman Enrique Tarrio 22 year sentence despite him never setting foot in D.C. that day.
Biggs called into The Alex Jones Show from prison back in September to provide an update on his case and his time in jail:
Don’t forget, Infowars relies on YOUR SUPPORT! To continue funding this independent operation, we urge you to visit the Infowars Store where you can fund the battle against globalism by purchasing great products such as dietary supplements, air and water filters, books, t-shirts, survival gear and much more.
Disgraced Harvard President Claudine Gay Blames ‘White Supremacy’ For Plagiarism Scandal
Disgraced Harvard president Claudine Gay, who was exposed as a serial plagiarist, has blamed “white supremacy” for the scandal that forced her to resign from her job just six months in the role. Gay has […]
The post Disgraced Harvard President Claudine Gay Blames ‘White Supremacy’ For Plagiarism Scandal appeared first on The People’s Voice.
Shock Video: Illegal Alien Invaders Line Up to Receive ‘Free’ Taxpayer-Funded Housing in NYC
Shocking video out of New York City shows a massive line of illegal aliens lining up to apply for “free” housing paid for by the taxpayers.
The taxpayer-funded housing scheme is part of NYC’s “sanctuary city” policy that guarantees free housing for illegal migrants.
“Because this is a sanctuary city, housing is guaranteed — so if they wait in line, they can re-apply and be re-housed,” Fox News reporter Madison Alworth said in front of the queue of migrants.
In New York City, illegal immigrants are lined up for blocks to receive free, taxpayer-funded housing:
— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) January 2, 2024
“Because this is a sanctuary city, housing is guaranteed — so if they wait in line, they can re-apply and be re-housed.” pic.twitter.com/hxr6exk9AV
“What you’re seeing is this line that wraps around the corner and has been this long all day long.”
“It has yet to be seen how much that will cost. What I can tell you is that the crisis up to this point has cost $3 billion,” she added.
About 70,000 illegal aliens are now residing in New York City which has faced an even greater influx of migrants as a result of Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) busing them into the city from the border.
“Texas has transported over 95,000 migrants to sanctuary cities. Sanctuary cities like NYC & Chicago have seen only a FRACTION of what overwhelmed Texas border towns face daily. We will continue our transportation mission until Biden reverses course on his open border policies,” Abbott wrote on X Tuesday.
Texas has transported over 95,000 migrants to sanctuary cities.
— Greg Abbott (@GregAbbott_TX) January 2, 2024
Sanctuary cities like NYC & Chicago have seen only a FRACTION of what overwhelmed Texas border towns face daily.
We will continue our transportation mission until Biden reverses course on his open border policies.
New York City Mayor Eric Adams (D) has been calling on Congress and the federal government to provide financial aid to the city to deal with the “surge” of illegal migrants while condemning Abbott’s political tactic.
“New York City has begun to see another surge of migrants arriving, and we expect this to intensify over the coming days as a result of Texas Governor Abbott’s cruel and inhumane politics,” Adams said last week.
“We need federal and state help to resettle and support the remaining 68,000 migrants currently in New York City’s care and the thousands of individuals who continue to arrive every single week, and for Governor Abbott to finally stop the games and use of migrants as political pawns.”
If only free housing was provided for U.S. veterans instead of law-breaking non-U.S. citizens.