News

The Clintons have long considered Haiti to be their personal playground where they can indulge in their wildest fantasies with close friends from the global elite, according to Haitians who allege the Democrat power couple […]

The post Clintons’ Secret Pedophile and Cannibal Club in Haiti Exposed By Locals appeared first on The People’s Voice.

Parade float in Wisconsin ridicules senile puppet president.

A float at a St. Patrick’s Day parade over the weekend brutally lampooned presidential steward Joe Biden.

The float, which featured Trump campaign posters, drove through at a St. Paddy’s Day parade that reportedly took place in Prairie du Chien, Wisconsin.

It featured a person dressed as Biden looking around confused as he consumed an ice cream cone.

The hilariously accurate float shows Americans are acutely aware the Democrat puppet president is a joke greatly deserving of ridicule and mockery.

Come November, voters will have a chance to express their disdain for the 46th president at the ballot box, and hopefully will close the chapter on the disastrous Biden regime.

---

---

Fully vaccinated professional athletes are continuing to drop like flies, with two pro soccer players collapsing suddenly, clutching their hearts, this weekend alone. According to the mainstream media, which is doing everything it can to […]

The post Second Professional Footballer Collapses With Heart Problems On Live TV In Last 2 Days appeared first on The People’s Voice.

81-year-old reportedly wearing ‘lifestyle sneakers’ to help with balance and stability.

Joe Biden is reportedly wearing new “boat anchor” footwear in apparent efforts to help with balance and stability, as the 81-year-old puppet president has a penchant for falling.

Biden’s new “Hoka Transport” sneakers, “designed for maximum comfort and support while walking or hiking,” according to Inside Edition, have been noticed on Biden’s feet since after his physical exam in late February, prompting speculation they could have been prescribed.

“The sneakers also boast a seal of approval from the American Podiatric Association as being good for foot health, a benefit which could come in handy for Biden after his recent physical revealed he suffers from a ‘stiffened gait,’” The New York Post reports.

Inside Edition speculated the shoes could help Biden keep his balance.

“As you can see they look quite comfortable,” described Inside Edition‘s Les Trent. “They have a wide sole, no doubt great for stability and the president does have a history of stumbling.”

The Post characterized the footwear as “boat anchor shoes,” noting Biden has frequently tripped, fallen, and stumbled while serving in office.

From the New York Post:

Biden has especially struggled going up and down the steps of Air Force One, repeatedly slipping and stumbling while ascending to and descending from his official plane.

After a series of near-pratfalls, the president has opted to use retractable stairs at the back of the plane for boarding — rather than the regular longer steps at the front of the aircraft.

Biden’s slips culminated in an ugly tumble at the Air Force Academy commencement exercises in June last year, in which he tripped on a sandbag and fell heavily to the stage.

The large “lifestyle sneakers” were openly mocked on social media, where users pointed out former President Donald Trump does not require such footwear.

Evidently, the White House is aware of the rumors swirling over the shoes, with White House deputy press secretary Andrew Bates telling The Post last Wednesday Biden uses them because he likes to exercise.

“I know y’all aren’t partial to presidents who exercise, but don’t worry — you’ll get used to it,” Bates claimed.

Social media users didn’t buy the lame excuse.

As noted, Biden’s stability sneakers serve as a symbol to the rest of the world that he’s a doddering, frail, senile old man who struggles to keep his balance, projecting weakness to the international community on the world stage.

Here’s Inside Edition’s report on the sneakers from last month:

H/t: TheGateWayPundit.com

---

The globalists are increasing their attacks on Infowars and the stakes have never been higher!

Please consider donating and visit InfowarsStore.com for merch, nutraceuticals and survival gear.

---

Follow the author on X, Facebook, Gab, Minds, Truth Social and Gettr.

---

---

Deranged leftist continues pushing divisive anti-Trump rhetoric

Lunatic liberal political commentator Keith Olbermann expressed “hope” that somebody will kill Donald Trump.

The Biden-Harris HQ X account wrote, “Trump says he has been treated worse than Abraham Lincoln, who was assassinated,” and Olbermann added, “There’s always the hope.”

But, just fifteen minutes earlier, Olbermann tagged the FBI X account and cried about Trump making “a terrorist threat” when he said the U.S. auto industry will suffer a “bloodbath” if he isn’t re-elected in this year’s presidential election.

“This is a terrorist threat, @FBI. Detain him as he leaves the stage. After which America doesn’t give a shit where you keep him,” he wrote.

Popular attorney and political podcast host Viva Frei called Olbermann a “disgrace” and posted a video providing the full context of Trump’s “bloodbath” remark.

“You realize you are exactly what you accuse Trump of being? You realize your legacy is going to be that of an unhinged lunatic who is as dishonest as he is bat-shit crazy? Does that not bother you?” Frei asked.

Keith, you realize you are a disgrace, right?

You realize you are exactly what you accuse Trump of being?

You realize your legacy is going to be that of an unhinged lunatic who is as dishonest as he is bat-shit crazy?

Does that not bother you? pic.twitter.com/3qu7Z8PAZr

— Viva Frei (@thevivafrei) March 16, 2024

The majority of mainstream news outlets and most Democrat politicians have repeated the lie about Trump’s comment, leaving people like X owner Elon Musk to correct their false claims.

“This headline is deceptive, as he was referring to the auto industry. Shame on NBC,” he posted.

Sleepy Joe promoted the lie on X:

Viva Frei joined Alex Jones to talk about the hoax during the Sunday transmission of The Alex Jones Show:

---

Entire point of the First Amendment (and Bill of Rights) is to curb government overreach.

Liberal Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown-Jackson appeared to support government censorship during oral arguments on Monday, claiming her “biggest concern” is the First Amendment “hamstringing” the government.

The Supreme Court heard arguments on the Biden Justice Department’s appeal of the Murthy v. Missouri case, where numerous states accused Democratic officials in the Biden administration of pressuring social media companies to unconstitutionally censor conservative viewpoints on topics like COVID-19 and election integrity.

The states argued that White House communications staffers, the surgeon general, the FBI and the U.S. cybersecurity agency (CISA) are among those who coerced social media platforms to censor content.

At one point, Brown-Jackson claimed that certain situations may warrant government censorship.

“Whether or not the government can do this…depends on the application of our First Amendment jurisprudence,” she said. “There may be circumstances in which the government could prohibit certain speech on the internet or otherwise.”

Kentaji Brown Jackson grills LA solicitor general, says that because the govt can occasionally censor, they can also occasionally coerce:

KBJ: “Whether or not the government can do this… depends on the application of our First Amendment jurisprudence.

There may be… pic.twitter.com/LmoL7bZDQY

— System Update (@SystemUpdate_) March 18, 2024

She continued, “My biggest concern is that your view has the First Amendment hamstringing the government in significant ways.”

KBJ doubles down: “My biggest concern is that your view has the First Amendment hamstringing the government in significant ways.”

That is, quite literally, the entire point of the First Amendment—of the entire Bill of Rights. pic.twitter.com/gWMCaHDG1W

— System Update (@SystemUpdate_) March 18, 2024

Brown-Jackson doesn’t appear to grasp that the First Amendment’s entire point, along with the Bill of Rights, is to curb government overreach.

Conservative Justice Samuel Alito noted as much during the session, warning that coordinating between the federal government and Big Tech companies could imperil free speech.

“When I see the White House and Federal officials repeatedly saying that Facebook and the Federal government should be partners…regular meetings, constant pestering…Wow, I cannot imagine Federal officials taking that approach to print media.”

? Happening NOW: Murthy v. Missouri—SCOTUS hears arguments on US govt collusion with social media platforms to censor online speech.

A US judge has called this case “the most massive attack against free speech in United States’ history.”

Alito: “When I see the White House and… pic.twitter.com/5lp6wtWb2j

— System Update (@SystemUpdate_) March 18, 2024

“If you did that to them, what do you think the reaction would be?” he asked, adding that Section 230 has given the government carte blanche to treat social media companies like “subordinates.”

Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) excoriated Brown-Jackson over her anti-free speech comments.

“There was one line I still can’t believe Judge Jackson said this. She said to the solicitor general from Louisiana, she said, ‘You’ve got the First Aemdment hamstringing the government.’ Think about that. That’s the whole stinking purpose!” Jordan told political commentator Steven Crowder.

“Judge Jackson said ‘You’ve got the First Amendment hamstringing the government.'” – @Jim_Jordan pic.twitter.com/d8G40bIpJ3

— Steven Crowder (@scrowder) March 18, 2024

“The fact you have a person on the United States Supreme Court make that statement in the arguments on a case about censorship…at one point, I don’t even know what to say. How can you make that statement? It’s crazy,” he added.

Unfortunately, other conservative Justices like Amy Coney Barrett and Chief Justice John Roberts appeared to side with the Biden administration, claiming if restrictions are tight on the government’s ability to censor, it could open the door to potential harm caused by content about war, terrorist activity or dangerous hypothetical viral challenges that teens sometimes partake in.

I am listening to Amy Coney Barrett make the case that the government sometimes has good justification to coerce a social media platform to takedown protected speech

How did Trump manage to nominate a neocon to the court

This lady is beyond compromised pic.twitter.com/RKnD5USWOP

— George (@BehizyTweets) March 18, 2024

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) summed up the stakes of this historic case as one that could “redefine our free speech.”

“Today, SCOTUS heard Murthy v. Missouri, the most consequential free speech case in U.S. history. This isn’t just about social media companies; it’s a critical examination of government overreach,” Paul wrote on X.

Today, SCOTUS heard Murthy v. Missouri, the most consequential free speech case in U.S. history. This isn’t just about social media companies; it’s a critical examination of government overreach. The Biden administration and FBI’s efforts to influence Big Tech into silencing…

— Rand Paul (@RandPaul) March 18, 2024

“The Biden administration and FBI’s efforts to influence Big Tech into silencing dissent tramples on the 1st Amendment. Our focus must be on preventing government censorship, not compelling private entities to act as censors. This case could redefine our free speech.”

A decision in Murthy v. Missouri is expected by early summer.

Listen to the full oral arguments:

---

Follow Jamie White on X | Truth | Gab | Gettr | Minds