Obesity Rate Doubles as Food Companies Fatten up Americans Like Cows with ‘Health at Any Size’ Propaganda Campaign
To keep Americans gobbling down their chemical-laced, genetically modified (GMO) poisons with glee, processed food giants like General Mills are pushing a “health at any size” narrative that presents obesity and chronic illness as trendy and “woke.”
The goal is to convince as many Americans as possible that being fat and sick is completely normal, all so they continue buying sugar- and preservative-filled feed slop that fattens them up like cows for slaughter.
Jaye Rochon learned this the hard way after she bought the “health at any size” mantra and quickly gained 50 pounds. Rochon was already overweight to begin with, so that extra 50 pounds brought her up to a very unhealthy 300 pounds.
Rochon fell for the lies being peddled by General Mills that “anti-dieting” is a scientifically proven strategy to get and stay healthy at any weight. The 51-year-old video editor from Wausau, Wisc., now knows that the food industry’s “anti-diet research” is a total sham, as is the idea that “food shaming” causes harm.
“They made me feel like I was safe eating whatever the hell I wanted,” Rochon told The Washington Post, which ran a profile on her and her story.
(Related: Learn more about how the Obesity Industrial Complex pushes junk food on children from an early age so they grow up to be fat, sluggish pharmaceutical junkies.)
Nestlé also pays dietitians to shove unhealthy junk food in people’s faces
In the case of General Mills, the company showers registered dietitians with cash and gifts in exchange for their support of the #DerailTheShame social media movement, which is similar to the pro-drugs movement behind Big Pharma.
Just like how the pharmaceutical industry showers doctors with cash, fancy dinners and vacations, and gifts for pushing pharmaceuticals and vaccines on their patients, General Mills is essentially bribing dietitians to promote junk food to their patients.
General Mills sponsors social media “influencers” whose job it is to influence the gullible. The company also pays a sizable team of lobbyists to push back against federal policies that aim to clean up the food supply and promote real health through non-obesity.
“You can help derail the cycle of shame,” said Amy Cohn, General Mills’ senior manager for nutrition and external affairs, in an anti-diet diatribe she delivered at a national food conference last fall.
“People need to feel heard and seen to break the cycle of shame around weight loss and eating,” tweeted Kathryn Lawson, a dietitian who works at Nestlé, during the conference at which Cohn spoke.
An analysis of 6,000 social media posts shared by 68 dietitians with more than 10,000 followers found that about 40 percent of them use this same anti-diet language, the vast majority of them taking money from food, beverage and supplement companies. All in all, these propagandists have reached around nine million people with their propaganda.
In 2023, no fewer than 10 dietitians promoted General Mills cereals on TikTok and Instagram using the hashtag #DerailTheShame. Many of the posts depicted personalized Cheerios boxes, Cheerios being one of General Mills’ most iconic cereal brands.
Last November, an “anti-diet” dietitian named Cara Harbstreet promoted Cinnamon Toast Crunch and Trix on her TikTok account, advocating for “fearlessly nourishing meals, including cereal.” In Harbstreet’s case, she at least included the hashtag #sponsored to indicate that she was paid to be cringe.
“Americans are being poisoned and turned into a bunch of fat, gay retards,” one commenter wrote. “Obesity is increasing. IQs are decreasing. Fertility is decreasing. Mortality is increasing. Enjoy the peaceful genocide. Just be sure to get some of the good footage of it on your cell phone.”
The latest news about America’s polluted food supply can be found at StopEatingPoison.com.
Kremlin Reacts to Biden Dropping out of US Presidential Race
Russia has other priorities than waiting for the outcome of the US presidential elections, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said, when reached for comment on US President Joe Biden withdrawing from the race.
Winning the conflict against Ukraine is among the top priorities for Russia, Peskov told Russian news outlet Life late on Sunday.
“For us, reaching the goals of the special military operation [against Ukraine] is a priority, rather than the outcome of the US elections,” Peskov stated.
The spokesman stood by the remarks by President Vladimir Putin, who said earlier this year he would have preferred Biden winning the election, describing him as “an old-school politician” and “more predictable” from the standpoint of Moscow’s interests.
READ MORE: Russia accuses US media of ‘collusion’ over Biden’s health
“That’s certainly the case, but the elections are still four months ahead. And it’s a long period, over which many things can change,” Peskov noted.
Biden dropped out of the race earlier in the day, stating that while it was his “intention” to get reelected, it was in “the best interest” of the Democratic Party and the whole country to withdraw.
The US leader also endorsed his vice president, Kamala Harris, as the best pick for the Democratic nominee. Harris has already been backed by multiple top Democratic politicians and major party donors.
Dan Proft: Democrats ‘Have Neither the Message to Deliver Nor the Horse to Deliver It’
In the late 1500s, Thomas Hobson worked as a carrier of messages and packages between Cambridge and London. He also owned a stable where he rented horses to university students. As some of those students took a liking to particular horses the favored horses got overworked. To solve this problem, Hobson simply placed the horses in a line, like taxis at an airport today, and compelled students to take the next horse in line. He provided only the appearance of a choice.
But I’m not talking about 16th century British transportation, I’m talking about the 2024 Democrat Party and the appearance of choice they have for their Presidential nominee.
They have neither the message to deliver nor the horse to deliver it. Regardless of the choice they make, Democrats are in for a Shakespearean-level comeuppance.
Particularly after the failed assassination attempt, Republicans are enthusiastically unified around Trump.
The convention speeches offered by Republicans vanquished by Trump in his first primary election like Rubio and Cruz as well as those in his last primary like DeSantis and Haley made clear that the interests of competing factions within the GOP are aligned.
You don’t hear much talk anymore even from the most outspoken Trump skeptics within the GOP about the former President’s ability to win in November, do you?
By contrast, the Democrats are splintered with only more acrimony and recriminations on the horizon.
Democrats are staring at an electoral equation Archimedes couldn’t solve.
Setting aside his catastrophic record, Democrats can’t stick with Biden simply because he still has a September 10th debate on his calendar.
They can’t turn to Kamala because, setting aside her own bouts with incoherence, she makes independent voters long for Hillary Clinton’s cackle.
They can’t end-run Kamala with a dude or a white chick because the Orthodox Identitarian Elites will don their vagina hats and revolt.
I’d suggest one of their tech billionaire financiers could come up with an AI solution but that donor class has already evacuated.
Even if they rode through the convention on a horse with a name, they have no message to deliver.
The hysterical Hitlerization of Trump is exposed as contrived when you offer thoughts and prayers for his well-being. And the calls for civil discourse come off as more than a bit disingenuous when you insist on that characterization.
The anti-democratic choices the Democrat Party made for the past eight years has left them without a message or a horse to carry it and instead only a Hobson’s Choice for President.
Trump Donations to Harris in 2011 Revealed
Former US President and Republican nominee Donald Trump previously donated to the campaign of Kamala Harris, who is now his potential rival.
According to records of the California Secretary of State, the Trump organization contributed $5,000 in 2011 when Harris was seeking reelection as attorney general, and a further $1,000 in 2013. His daughter Ivanka donated another $2,000 to Harris in 2014.
The revelation began circulating on social media on Sunday, following US President Joe Biden’s withdrawal from the November elections and his subsequent endorsement of Kamala Harris as his successor. The vice president claimed that she would “earn and win” the Democratic nomination to run for the Oval Office.
READ MORE: Biden endorses Kamala Harris as successor
During his 2016 campaign, Trump admitted to donating to both Democrats and Republicans, including his then-opponent Hillary Clinton, claiming that politicians can be bought and paid for.
“These politicians, they’re so bad,” he said at the time. “I’ve got to give it to them because when I want something, I get it. When I call, they kiss my a**.”
“You know, it’s interesting. I was looking at the ones I’m running against. I’ve contributed to most of them – can you believe it? I’ve contributed to most of them. And one of them said, ‘No, I don’t think you’ve contributed to me.’ They found out I did. I contribute to everybody. I’ve given to Democrats. I’ve given to Hillary. I’ve given to everybody because that was my job.”
According to OpenSecrets, the nation’s premier research group tracking money in US politics, Trump made a $1,000 donation to then-Senator Joe Biden’s campaign in 2001 and several contributions to Hillary Clinton’s campaign between 2006 and 2007, including a $100,000 donation to the Clinton Foundation.
Evidence of Multiple Shooters at Trump Assassination Attempt
Secret Service Head Cheatle says Agency ‘Totally Responsible’ For Security at Trump’s Butler, Penn., Rally
It was nobody else’s responsibility but Secret Service to keep Donald Trump safe at his recent rally in Butler, Penn., confirmed Kim Cheatle, the current head of the Secret Service.
In an interview with CNN, Cheatle admitted that the agency she oversees was “totally responsible” for security at the rally, which saw a gunman fire at Trump from around 150 yards away, injuring his ear and several rally attendees, one of whom was killed.
“At that particular site, we divided up areas of responsibility, but the Secret Service is totally responsible for the design and implementation and the execution of the site,” Cheatle confessed.
The admission comes as debates rage on over whose responsibility it was to keep Trump and his followers safe during the event. Some say local law enforcement is to blame for what occurred while others blame Secret Service for failing to do its job.
(Related: Did you hear the call that Trump made to Robert F. Kennedy Jr. after the assassination attempt to talk about vaccine injuries?)
“The buck stops here,” says Cheatle
In an exclusive interview with ABC News, Cheatle went further in calling the shooting “unacceptable” and “something that shouldn’t happen again.”
The incident marks the first time since 1981 that a former president has been wounded in an attempted assassination – the last time was Ronald Reagan.
“It was obviously a situation that as a Secret Service agent no one ever wants to occur in their career,” Cheatle said, implying that she is more upset the incident occurred under her watch because of how bad it makes her look than the fact that it occurred at all.
“The buck stops with me,” Cheatle continued, using buck language just a few days ahead of this month’s Buck Moon on July 21.
“I am the director of the Secret Service, and I need to make sure that we are performing a review and that we are giving resources to our personnel as necessary.”
Responding to claims that her agents and the local law enforcement officers they were coordinating with failed to do anything about Thomas Matthew Crooks despite seeing him behaving suspiciously a half hour before he opened fire, Cheatle said it was “a very short period of time” that made it “difficult” to adequately respond in time.
“I don’t have all the details yet,” she said. “Seeking that person out, finding them, identifying them, and eventually neutralizing them took place in a very short period of time, and it makes it very difficult.”
It was local police who were supposed to secure the building atop which the shooter perched himself before opening fire.
“In this particular instance, we did share support for that particular site and that the Secret Service was responsible for the inner perimeter,” Cheatle explained.
“And then we sought assistance from our local counterparts for the outer perimeter. There was local police in that building – there was local police in the area that were responsible for the outer perimeter of the building.”
Despite continued calls for her to resign from her role, Cheatle, like Joe Biden, says she is not going anywhere and will stay. She reportedly attempted to contact Trump “but has not yet spoken with him.”
According to reports, Cheatle is scheduled to testify before the GOP-led House Oversight Committee on July 22.
“Secret Service is not political,” Cheatle insists. “Security is not political. People’s safety is not political. And that’s what we’re focused on as an agency.”
As we approach election day when Trump’s ear should be healed, you can keep up with the latest news about his presidential campaign at Trump.news.
Obama Aide Chosen To Investigate Trump Assassination Attempt
Former Obama aide Janet Napolitano has been named by DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas as the person who should investigate the Secret Service failures that led to Trump being shot. What could possibly go wrong? Frontpagemag.com […]
The post Obama Aide Chosen To Investigate Trump Assassination Attempt appeared first on The People’s Voice.