‘He Suffered Greatly’: Parents of Student Who Died After Pfizer Shot Speak Out
In 2022, 23-year-old Trent Lieffring was working toward a promising future. He was attending college in Nashville, he was in a happy relationship and, according to his parents, was “a pure, sweet, kind soul” and “extremely healthy and in great athletic shape.”
Believing it was the right thing to do, Trent received two doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine in 2022, two-and-a-half months apart. Initially, all seemed well — but approximately eight to nine months later, Trent experienced cardiac arrest and subsequent brain damage, apparently due to blood clots.
Trent spent the rest of his life in a vegetative state until he died on Aug. 24, 2023. His death certificate acknowledged “reaction to COVID-19 vaccination” as one of the causes of his death.
Trent’s parents, Andy Lieffring and Kimberly Aveyah, joined CHD.TV’s “The People’s Study” today to share Trent’s story.
‘There was no sign of this coming’
Kimberly told CHD.TV that Trent’s biology professor “had kind of given a speech to his class on taking the shot for the good of others.”
Although “Trent didn’t need it … he took that speech to heart and went and got the vaccine,” Kimberly said.
Trent was vaccinated despite the misgivings of his parents. Kimberly said he had asked her if he should get vaccinated.
“As a family, we suggested that he didn’t, no one else in the family took it,” she said. “We were not on board with it. We thought it was rolled out way too fast. We had our suspicions right from the beginning.”
Initially, all appeared well with Trent, with his girlfriend reporting that he had only a headache after getting his second dose.
“So far as we knew, everything was OK with him,” Andy said. “Trent was a very healthy individual.”
But “eight to nine months later,” Trent began experiencing adverse reactions.
Trent got home about 11 o’clock one night, after working as a valet in downtown Nashville, and “just didn’t feel good and was very feverish throughout the night,” according to his girlfriend, Andy recalled. “Very restless.”
He got up several times to go to the bathroom, “which was very unusual for him, and he seemed very agitated, he didn’t feel good at all,” Andy said. When he didn’t feel any better in the morning, Trent’s girlfriend decided to get him a COVID-19 test.
“She went into the bathroom … and she started getting ready and she heard him say something to her and turned around and he had passed out,” Andy said. “He had gone into cardiac arrest.”
According to Andy, it took paramedics “a very long time to revive our son.” They “actually revived him once, lost him, and then revived him again.” By the time they got him breathing, he had sustained significant brain damage because of how long his brain had been deprived of oxygen.
His parents were out of state when Trent collapsed. When they returned to Nashville late that evening, they found Trent in the hospital on a ventilator, with “tubes everywhere” and “his head wrapped up,” Kimberly recalled.
“We were just trying to understand what happened because he was completely healthy,” Kimberly said. “There was no sign of this coming.”
Doctors ‘just kind of shut up’
Trent’s doctors “had no clue” what was wrong, Andy said.
“We did end up running extensive tests and nothing was conclusive. Various different things like something called Factor V Leiden, which is a high blood clotting factor in the blood, which does run in my family, but it came back negative. It was all speculation, but nobody had any answers,” Andy said.
Ultrasound examinations, however, did find some blood clots in one of his legs, Andy said. This led to a provisional determination that Trent’s condition “could have had something to do with blood clots,” after doctors had ruled out a stroke.
“One ICU [intensive care unit] nurse had said, ‘I just don’t see how this could have shut down his heart unless there was a blood clot that first shut down his lungs, and [then] the cardiac arrest.’ That was her best guess,” Andy recalled.
But while some nurses viewed Trent’s condition with suspicion, doctors kept silent, Andy said. “No doctor ever gave us a diagnosis or an opinion or anything. Any time we brought up vaccination, COVID … everybody just kind of shut up.”
Doctors began to focus on treating Trent’s emerging symptoms.
“He’s biting his lips so hard, he’s becoming rigid and having these spasms, there’s a lot of things that happen when you have a severe anoxic brain injury. And so, that became the focus. We were told that it was extensive brain damage, but that sometimes, given time, some people come out of what they were saying was a vegetative state,” Kimberly recalled.
Initially, Trent responded to some stimuli in his environment.
“He could respond to pain and sounds and things like that that are coming from your brainstem, those basic functions,” Kimberly said. “But it’s hard to say if someone in the vegetative state is aware of you or not. Sometimes we thought he was. And then as things progressed … I didn’t feel like he knew we were there.”
Andy noted that Trent was also “heavily medicated” during this period, “because his spasticity got so bad.” It was difficult to ascertain whether Trent would have had more situational awareness had he not been on such medications.
“It was a double-edged sword. The medication also kept him from suffering,” Andy said. “He suffered greatly.”
Trent spent nearly a month in the hospital, but as he was uninsured, his family had to transfer him to a state-run nursing home, despite their reluctance.
“Pretty poor conditions. I remember when they took him there that night,” Andy recalled. “I freaked out … and I said, my son’s not staying here.” However, after a nurse’s reassurance, Trent was admitted, and Andy stayed with him for the night.
Trent spent three months in the facility, with his parents spending “10, 11 hours a day” with him. But when he became sick and had to be transferred to the emergency room, his family learned that he was approved for Medicaid, enabling him to be readmitted to the hospital, and subsequently to return home.
“The fight from there was, ‘Get me a doctor so that I can take my boy home.’ And we were able to, after probably about a two-week stay, we were able to be discharged to home. Never went back to the nursing home,” Andy said.
Trent spent the last four months of his life at home, during which he did some physical and speech therapy at a local rehab facility. At times, he seemed to be improving.
“There were things that were, maybe, signs,” Andy said. “Every once in a while, you’d feel like he was watching you … you felt like his eyes were following you or there was maybe a small response,” despite being on strong doses of Valium and other medications.
Without the medication, Andy said Trent would visibly struggle.
“His hands and wrists would curl over, and his legs would turn in, his ankles would turn in, almost like his foot looked like a hockey stick … And there were times where it was when they tried to take him off the Valium and they tried it too quickly and he was almost convulsing,” Andy said.
But even with medication, Trent’s condition gradually worsened. “In the months after that, he started to shut down a little bit more. He had gallbladder issues. About a month before his passing, we had a drain installed on his gallbladder,” Andy recalled.
A difficult decision to place Trent under hospice care
Trent’s gallbladder issues served as a crossroads for his family, leading to the difficult decision to place him in hospice care.
“There was a choice to … install a drain or to have his gallbladder removed, which would have been another painful surgery that he would’ve had to recover from,” Andy said. “And we had decided at that point that once he gets to the one-year mark, we should probably just go the hospice route. And so knew that we knew it was coming.”
Kimberly said:
“When we made the decision that we didn’t think he was going to make any more progress or come out of this vegetative state and that he was suffering so much, so many more problems were starting to happen. We talked to the hospice nurses about, ‘OK, how do we handle this?’”
This process, Kimberly recalled, initially involved withdrawing food and water.
“At first, that just sounded horrifying to us. Turns out that actually … his last nine days, as we were removing the food and water and walking him through this process, were the most comfortable and peaceful that we saw him,” she said.
During Trent’s final days of life, family members were by his side, Kimberly said:
“We wanted to have it at home, with family surrounding him. And so, we used the days to sing with him, to laugh with him, tell him stories about himself and things we did as a family prayed, some extended family came in to visit here and there.
“When Trent passed away, it probably was one of the most beautiful experiences of just releasing his body and the suffering attached to it, completely surrounded by those that loved him. So, it was actually the most peaceful and serene time since the accident started.”
COVID vaccine listed as one of the causes of Trent’s death
To the surprise of Trent’s parents, his death certificate included the COVID-19 vaccine as one of the causes of his death.
“What they wrote on the death certificate was an anoxic brain injury due to cardiopulmonary arrest with resuscitation due to COVID vaccination reaction,” Kimberly said.
According to Andy, it was the hospice nurses who decided to include the COVID-19 vaccine on Trent’s death certificate as one of the causes of his death.
“I never requested that [but] our son was not the first strange case that they had seen, and none of them even had any pushback on any of our thoughts about that,” Andy said. “I believe those nurses saw the same thing we did. I believe that that was their belief as well. Otherwise, they wouldn’t have put that on his death certificate.”
“Especially when you’re in the hospital, nobody wants to talk to you about the COVID vaccine being the issue at all,” Kimberly said. “As we got a little bit further away … there were more and more doctors that would say that, yes, they thought it was from the COVID vaccination.”
Even 11 months after Trent’s passing, Andy said, “There’s not a single day … where it doesn’t hit you like a ton of bricks. “Sometimes, you feel like your heart’s going to explode. He would have been a fantastic father.”
Trent’s parents also had a message for Pfizer, Andy said:
“Pfizer, whoever is in charge, and it’s not just a greed thing, it’s a political thing. It’s been weaponized, they will all have to answer to a holy God. And that, to me, is the ultimate justice.”
Finnish Court Quashes Convictions of Several Men Found Guilty of Raping Intellectually Disabled Woman
The convictions of several men jailed for repeatedly raping a mentally incapacitated woman over a three-year period have been overturned by Finland’s Court of Appeal after the court ruled the woman’s disability did not mean she could not consent.
Seven men, including Samir Jasin Kadir, Alaa Kamil Al-Saadi, Sami Al-Mosawi, and Mohammed Ali Mohammed Mohammed, were handed sentences ranging between 10 months and 2.5 years by the District Court of Pirkanmaa back in May 2022.
The defendants, aged between 23 and 52, were found to have sexually abused the disabled woman multiple times between December 2017 and February 2020 when she was often led by the hand to the defendants’ respective houses and raped.
The case turned on the legal argument of whether the victim’s intellectual disability was obvious enough to be detectable regardless of nationality and cultural background, and whether the defendants, therefore, should have known the victim could not give informed consent.
The lower court upon conviction held that the victim’s disability placed her in parallel with a minor in her inability to consent to sexual intercourse.
It found that the victim’s intellectual disability had been a key factor in the defendants’ desire to have sexual intercourse with the victim due to the ease with which she could be manipulated, thus constituting rape.
The convictions were appealed to the higher court in Turku, which this week quashed all sentences and revoked the compensation order awarded to the victim of €16,000 payable by the defendants.
The Court of Appeal accepted the appellants’ argument that they could not reasonably have been expected to detect the intellectual disability of the woman, ruling that people’s sexual behaviors are unique and diverse.
“Criminal law regulation is therefore not justified in aiming to maintain or achieve, for example, decency or uniform gender behavior. It must also be taken into account that different people’s sexual lives can be very different,” the Court of Appeal explained.
A medical report provided by the woman’s doctor to the court detailed how she was at an increased risk of being abused and was hypersensitive to situations where others could influence her actions almost entirely; however, the appellate court ruled that intellectual disability alone does not mean that a person is incapable of giving consent to sexual intercourse.
In its judgment, the court said the victim’s medical evaluation could “only be given a small weight when evaluating helplessness or unwillingness due to a helpless state.”
The verdict can still be appealed to the higher Supreme Court before Aug. 27.
‘Sign of Things to Come’: Singapore Approves 16 Insects for Human Food
Singapore has approved 16 insects as food for humans — becoming the latest country to authorize insect products for human consumption, in what The Guardian described as a move that “paves the way for plates to become wrigglier, leggier and more sustainable” and as “a sign of things to come.”
In a July 8 announcement, the Singapore Food Agency (SFA) approved the 16 insects, which include silkworm pupa and mealworm, “With immediate effect.”
“These insects and insect products can be used for human consumption or as animal feed for food producing animals,” the SFA stated.
Countries and entities such as the United Kingdom (U.K.), Australia and the European Union (EU) have already approved some insects for human consumption. However, in the U.S. existing regulations contain few references specifically addressing insects.
This regulatory gap has enabled an ecosystem of “alternative protein” startups to enter the insect food market — with the backing of figures such as Bill Gates and government agencies including the United Nations (U.N.) and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and the National Science Foundation.
“The United Nations Food And Agricultural Organisation (FAO) continues to promote insect consumption as an environmentally friendly way to get protein in your diet — for both humans and their livestock,” The Guardian reported.
Proponents of insects as food for humans, including the FAO, argue this will help combat climate change, as insects produce a smaller carbon footprint than traditional livestock. But critics challenge this view.
“The justification for insects is to produce protein using fewer inputs: to save the planet by reducing climate change, methane from cows, less pollution,” internist Dr. Meryl Nass, founder of Door to Freedom, told The Defender. “But just because it is protein doesn’t mean it’s good for us.”
Nass cited parasites that could be spread by insects, difficulties in digesting insects, and common allergies to chitin — commonly found on the exoskeleton of insects.
According to Nass, lax U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations, under which many insects can be classified as “Generally Regarded as Safe” (GRAS), “means they don’t require testing” and enables the FDA to “look the other way.” This has opened the door for insect foods to reach consumers.
“How long will it take before we learn whether these foods are safe? It could take generations,” Nass said.
“Advocates for mass consumption of insect-based foods would like you to believe that bugs have been a reliable source of protein for thousands of years,” said Seamus Bruner, author of “Controligarchs: Exposing the Billionaire Class, their Secret Deals, and the Globalist Plot to Dominate Your Life.”
Bruner, who also is director of research at the Government Accountability Institute, told The Defender:
“While that is true, malnutrition and disease were also endemic and life expectancies were dramatically lower than they are today. The truth is that beef, pork, poultry and other animal-based foods are the most efficient and healthy sources of protein. These climate fanatics pushing insect-based foods are scaring people into adopting less healthy diets.”
Dutch journalist Elze van Hamelen told The Defender that using insect ingredients for pet food also poses a risk to public health, citing a 2019 study that found parasites in 244 of 300 insect farms and pet stores that were investigated.
“Feeding pets with parasite-infested insects, especially pets that do not have the physiology to digest bugs, may not be such a good idea,” van Hamelen said.
Michael Rectenwald, Ph.D., author of “The Great Reset and the Struggle for Liberty: Unraveling the Global Agenda,” told The Defender, “The insect craze is intimately connected to the U.N.’s Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).”
Rectenwald cited two SDGs: SDG 2, “End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture” and SDG 12, “Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns.”
“’Sustainability’ is code language for coerced reductions in consumption and forced behavioral modifications,” Rectenwald said.
Nass said the U.N., along with the World Economic Forum (WEF), “promote the so-called SDGs, which can supposedly be met if we change our diet.” Yet, “We don’t see the WEF or U.N. attendees eating insects at their meetings.”
Nass suggested that one reason behind the shift to insects as food is “to cause emotional harm: to degrade, debase, downgrade human beings” and that beef is “being demonized,” potentially to “weaken the species.”
“The idea seems to be to get rid of small producers and create a fully industrialized system of food production that Cargill, ConAgra, PepsiCo will profit from,” she added.
“Bill Gates claims his investments in alternative proteins are to save the planet,” Bruner said. “What he does not say is that they are part of a strategy to monopolize the protein industry — for profit — as he lobbies to ban animal-based competition.”
Insect firms in Singapore ‘educating’ children about insects as a food source
The 16 insects Singapore’s SFA has approved include “various species of crickets, grasshoppers, locusts, mealworms and silkworms,” The Straits Times reported. According to The Guardian, foods containing insects must clearly label this on the packaging, “to indicate the true nature of the product.”
The Straits Times reported that local restaurant chain House of Seafood is already “cooking up a menu of 30 insect-infused dishes to give customers more choice,” while other firms have begun “educating consumers” — including children — about insects as a food source for humans.
The report cited the example of Altimate Nutrition which, “While waiting for SFA’s regulatory approval … conducted workshops and educational sessions at almost a hundred schools, from pre-schools to institutes of higher learning.”
Surveys conducted after the program found that about 80% of students would be willing to try the insects after they are approved, The Straits Times reported.
But Bruner said other factors are likely at play in Singapore.
“The WEF — perhaps the largest driving force behind so-called ‘alternative proteins’ — frequently touts Singapore’s compliance with Agenda 2030, so the decision to prioritize insect-based foods is not surprising,” he said.
EU, U.K., Australia and other countries approve insects for consumption
Authorities in the EU, U.K. and Australia, among other countries, have also approved certain insects for human consumption.
Brussels Signal cited Ermolaos Ververis, scientific officer for the European Food Safety Authority Novel Foods Team, who said the EU has authorized six insects: “Alphitobius diaperinus larvae products, dried mealworms, whole and ground yellow mealworms, whole and ground Grasshoppers, whole and ground crickets, and partially defatted Whole Cricket Powder.”
Eight applications are still pending in the EU, where according to EU regulations, foods containing insects must be clearly labeled.
Brussels Signal reported that under Horizon Europe, a European Commission — the executive branch of the EU funding program for research and innovation — “insect-based proteins are considered one of the key areas of research.”
U.K. authorities have approved four insects for human consumption — yellow mealworm, house cricket, banded cricket and black soldier fly, as “novel foods,” while Australia has approved three species: two varieties of mealworm and a cricket.
According to the FAO, there are more than 1,900 “edible insect species.” However, insects don’t appear to be included in the FAO’s Codex Alimentarius — its international food safety guidelines.
‘Nudging’ the public toward acceptance
Several studies, including a 2020 report by the European Consumer Organisation, a 2021 YouGov poll and a 2022 report by UBA, Germany’s environmental agency, suggest low demand among the public for consuming foods containing insects.
Other studies in 2020 and 2022 suggested people would be more willing to shift their attitudes after being told about the “environmental benefits” of eating insects.
The 2020 study suggested that “nudging” — a behavioral science concept supported by the National Science Foundation — could be used to this end. “As humans are a particularly social species, leveraging the social nature may prove particularly useful,” the study said.
In a 2021 European Food Safety Authority report, Giovanni Sogari, Ph.D., an assistant professor in the Department of Food and Drug at the University of Parma in Italy, suggested, “There are cognitive reasons derived from our social and cultural experiences, the so-called ‘yuck factor’, that make the thought of eating insects repellent to many Europeans. With time and exposure such attitudes can change.”
And Lies Hackelbracht, the owner of TOR Royal, an insect production company in Belgium, told Euronews in 2021, “When we are 9 billion people, it won’t be possible to let everybody eat meat, so we have to search for other possibilities with a lot of protein and it can be in plants, but it can also be in insects.”
Doctor Who First Promoted HCQ and Ivermectin Hosts the Alex Jones Show, And Talks About Spiritual Warfare
Dr. Stella Immanuel joined Alex Jones on his Wednesday show in-studio to discuss the spiritual warfare taking place behind the scenes of pandemics, politics, and culture.
Don’t miss:
Agent Who Ran Biden’s Inauguration Wargame Says Trump Assassination A False Flag Event
Leaked Documents: German Gov’t Lied About Shots Preventing Covid, Knew Lockdowns did More Harm than Good
(LifeSiteNews) — Leaked documents from a top German health agency show that politicians knew the experimental COVID shots did not prevent the transmission of the virus but advocated for jab mandates anyway.
On July 23, independent journalist Aya Velázquez published the un-redacted miutes of the German Robert Koch Institut (RKI, comparable to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) from its meetings regarding the COVID crisis between 2020 and 2023. Velázquez said she received the un-redacted documents from a whistleblower who used to work for the RKI. Parts of the so-called “RKI files” had already been published in March this year, after the RKI was forced to publish them due to a lawsuit. However, many key parts of the files had been redacted.
Velázquez wrote that the now fully un-redacted files show “that the RKI unfortunately spoke out in favor of both facility-based and general compulsory vaccination despite the knowledge of the lack of protection from transmission and serious side effects.”
The minutes from an RKI meeting on November 5, 2021, demonstrate that the idea of a “pandemic of the unvaccinated” that was propagated by politicians and mainstream media members was made up and not based on any facts.
“The media are talking about a pandemic of the unvaccinated,” the minutes state. “From a factual point of view this is not correct, the entire population is contributing. Should this be taken up in communication?”
The document noted that this phrase, although factually incorrect, “serves as an appeal to all those who have not been vaccinated to get vaccinated.”
It furthermore states that the minister of health “says it at press conference, presumably deliberately, cannot be corrected.”
During the fall and winter months of 2021 and early 2022, German politicians repeatedly used the term “pandemic of the unvaccinated” to blame those who refused the experimental COVID jabs for “the pandemic” and all COVID-related measures. The government also used this line of reasoning to ban the unjabbed from participating in many parts of society, including having certain jobs, attending restaurants, shopping at stores, and many other areas.
German radiologist and chairman of the World Medical Association Frank Ulrich Montgomery even spoke of a “tyranny of the unvaccinated,” a statement that he doubled down on a year later.
Epoch Times Deutsch said that during this time, the unvaxxed faced “a level of exclusionary pressure that is unprecedented in the history of the Federal Republic of Germany.”
During the press conference held by the team around the journalist Aya Velázquez, Professor Stefan Homburg said an entry in the documents from March 19, 2021, showed that the RKI already knew that the AstraZeneca COVID shot had caused several cases of sinus vein thrombosis, barely 11 weeks into the “vaccination” campaign.
Homburg is an emeritus professor of economics who was the head of the public finance department of the Leibniz University in Hannover and who became one of the most well-known and formidable critics of the COVID tyranny in Germany.
Homburg furthermore said that the RKI files showed that the RKI and the Paul Ehrlich Institut (PEI) deliberately gave false testimony in court, for instance, in regard to protecting German soldiers against transmission of the virus. “In this respect, they could now be charged in court for unsworn testimony with reference to these minutes,” said Homburg.
According to the available data, Homburg said that the overall situation can be described as a “deception of the public.”
He told the Epoch Times that “the authorities deliberately deceived the public for years at the behest of politicians.”
Journalist Bastian Barucker told the Epoch Times that the documents showed that when Health Minister Jens Spahn announced school closures in November 2021, the RKI “had long known that this was not correct.”
In parts of the RKI files that were already released in March, the minutes of a meeting from January 11, 2023, show that the RKI knew that lockdowns cause more harm than good. “The consequences of the lockdown are sometimes more severe than Covid itself,” the document stated.
At the conclusion of the press conference, Velázquez said, “The RKI protocols prove it: Our corona policy was not based on rational, scientific considerations.”
“Numerous political decisions, such as 2G [full participation in society only given to vaxxed or recovered individuals], the facility-based and planned general vaccination mandate, or the vaccination of children, were purely political decisions for which the RKI, as an authority bound by instructions, provided an alleged scientific legitimation,” the journalist said.
Breakthrough in Negotiations with US as Apache Helicopters to Finally Arrive in Poland
Poland is set to sign an offset agreement within the next few weeks concerning the delivery of AH-64E Apache helicopters from the USA, concluding lengthy and challenging negotiations that had previously stalled the landmark deal.
Poland plans to purchase up to 96 helicopters, positioning itself as the largest operator of these aircraft outside their country of manufacture.
“I can say now that we have succeeded. We are finalizing the offset agreement,” confirmed Colonel Robert Fromholz, Deputy Chief of the Armament Agency, on Polsat News TV.
Colonel Fromholz further announced that the agreement would be finalized early next month with two international partners, Boeing and General Electric. The government approval of this agreement will be followed by the final contract with the USA for the helicopter deliveries. Additionally, a leasing agreement for eight helicopters is expected to be signed by the year’s end which will see these units arrive in Poland around the turn of the year.
According to Colonel Fromholz, the past three weeks have seen “groundbreaking, very difficult, laborious, and time-consuming talks,” which have concluded successfully, changing the approach of the contractual partners. As a result, Poland could sign the offset agreement as early as the first half of August.
“We reached consensus on key contentious issues. The next step, after signing the offset agreements, will be their approval by the Council of Ministers. Once that happens, we have the green light to sign the contract with the U.S. government for the delivery of Apache helicopters,” he stated.
The AH-64E Apache, manufactured by Boeing, has been a principal attack helicopter in the United States since the 1980s. Plans to purchase these helicopters were announced by the former Minister of National Defense, Mariusz Błaszczak, in September 2022.
The procurement of up to 96 helicopters would make Poland the second-largest fleet operator of these aircraft after the USA. The inclusion of as many manufacturing and servicing operations as possible within Poland aims to benefit local defense companies and enhance the operational capabilities of the military. Poland plans to use these helicopters for approximately 35-40 years.