News

Along with combatting mass immigration (illegal and legal), fighting for secure elections is also important

The Civil Rights movement of the mid-20th century occupies an important part of our history.

It is frequently referenced by contemporary politicians to make arguments about today’s issues.

Is this tactic always valid?

Consider a recent speech delivered by U.S. Attorney General Merrick S. Garland at the Tabernacle Baptist Church in Selma, Alabama, in commemoration of the 59th anniversary of Bloody Sunday in 1965.

(Was it a violation of the “Separation of Church and State” for the Attorney General to speak at a church? Of course not. After all, Garland is an official in the Biden administration.)

Here are some excerpts from Garland’s speech:

The Justice Department owes an enormous debt of gratitude to the courageous activists who marched here in Selma 59 years ago. And to those who will march today.

The AG thus established a linkage in the minds of his listeners, associating what occurred 59 years ago with a very different situation today.

There are many things that are open to debate in America. One thing that must not be open for debate is the right of all eligible citizens to vote and to have their vote counted.

Nearly all Americans would be in agreement with that.

Garland addressed obstacles to the right to vote which American blacks have faced in our history.

The AG discussed the Reconstruction era, when “white supremacists used violence and threats of violence to stop Black Americans from exercising their right to vote.”

Garland talked about the mid-20th century.

But the right to vote was still under attack nearly a century later, when Black residents trying to register to vote in this county, and in jurisdictions across the country, were required to take nearly impossible tests that were designed to ensure that they fail.

And the right to vote was under attack on Sunday, March 7, 1965, when civil rights activists set out to march from Selma to Montgomery and were met with horrific violence.

The marchers’ courage helped usher into law the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which gave the Justice Department important authorities to protect the right to vote.

Now, 59 years later, AG Garland says the right to vote is again under attack.

[C]ourt decisions in recent years have drastically weakened the protections of the Voting Rights Act that marchers on the Edmund Pettus Bridge bled for 59 years ago.

Really?

And since those decisions, there has been a dramatic increase in legislative measures that make it harder for millions of eligible voters to vote and to elect the representatives of their choice.

This is a serious charge the AG is making here. But does he back it up?

Garland gives several examples of attacks on the right to vote.

Nevertheless, in his entire speech Garland NEVER gives one example of a contemporary American citizen, of any race, who has been denied the right to vote.

Not one example.

Yet Garland authoritatively declares, “The right to vote is still under attack. And that is why the Justice Department is fighting back.”

And also –

That is why we are challenging efforts by states and jurisdictions to implement discriminatory, burdensome, and unnecessary restrictions on access to the ballot, including those related to mail-in voting, the use of drop boxes, and voter ID requirements.

Mail-in ballots and drop boxes were controversial practices associated with the disputed 2020 election.

And as for requiring secure photo voter ID, we’ve been told it disenfranchises people.

However, Mexico – where I formerly resided – has a very good voter registration system. In Mexico, the government issues photo voter ID.

Why can’t we have that here?

Along with combatting mass immigration (illegal and legal), fighting for secure elections is also important.

And here’s some good news: On February 29, three days prior to Garland’s speech, a federal judge in Arizona ruled that requiring voters to verify citizenship was not discriminatory.

---

Alex Jones Warns – Beware the Ides of March

Germ theory -vs- Terrain theory

Isolation means the separation of one thing from everything else. This is the only way to scientifically identify a thing. This is done with everything from large organic material to the smallest nano-particles. It is done with Gold and Silver. And it is done in basic chemistry, but it has never been done with a virus.

Several have claimed to have done so, but have since been exposed as frauds. And today, virologists claim that isolation is not possible because of the obligate intracellular nature of a virus. This means that they cannot exist outside of a living cell. But if this were true, then it would also be true that they can not spread from one person to another. The pseudo-science of virology is full of logical fallacies that any inquisitive person can recognize.

Scientific studies require a control group. Meaning that two samples are needed where every factor is the same except for the presence of the thing being studied. But this can not be done in virology because a virus has never been isolated. When virologists claim they are isolating it, they are lying. This is evident today with the latest so-called proofs that SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated.

In both the “Isolation and rapid sharing of the 2019 novel coronavirus” published by the Medical Journal of Australia. And in the “Viral isolation analysis of SARS-CoV-2” from Japan’s Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy, the titles suggest that they isolated a virus. But they clearly did not.

They took material from the most contaminated source possible, the nose, which acts as a filter by capturing particulates inhaled from the environment. And at no point did they isolate a virus from this sample.

What they did was run the entire mix of unknown material through a PCR test, and claimed that it tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. But we know that the PCR test is not capable of isolating a virus, and we know it’s been deliberately adjusted to give false positive results. So this is not science, it is fraud.

They then inoculated a culture of cells with the entire mix of nose material, added in unspecified material, and the cells died. At no point in these experiments was a virus ever isolated. They in fact did the opposite of isolation by adding foreign material to a mix of unknown material from a person’s nose. So even if the cells died as a result, there is no way of knowing what killed them.

There is an alternative theory that does not have massive funding from spurious foundations and Nobel Peace prizes to convince the public of it’s validity.

Terrain theory tells us that most of what we are told is a disease, is nothing more than the symptoms of a natural bodily process of healing and repairing tissues damaged from stress and external toxins. Cells naturally die and break down in a way that is identical to how virologists claim a virus behaves. And the very same foundations pushing the theory of the virus, have been simultaneously creating a more toxic world with petrochemical drugs that earn billions in profits. There are far more so-called diseases today than existed before this pseudo science was unleashed on society.

In 1859 Florence Nightingale published, Notes on Nursing, where in she wrote that, “all disease…is more or less a reparative process…an effort of nature to remedy a process of poisoning or of decay, which has taken place…sometimes years beforehand.” She is saying that what we are told today are symptoms of a disease, are actually natural processes of the body healing itself from damage.

Manly P. Hall, known best for his 1928 publication, The Secret Teachings of All Ages, gave a lecture in 1989 called, Magnetic Fields of the Human Body. In this lecture he described this same sentiment.

He said that each human body is surrounded by its own magnetic field which provides tremendous protection. And as long as the individual takes proper care of this magnetic field, it will heal all wounds and recover all bodily functions and organs. He said that the law of the energy field is also the law of integrity. When we break the laws of nature, we damage this flow, which in turn damages the individual’s vitality. This magnetic field can be damaged by negative attitudes such as fear, and destructive attitudes towards others. It can be damaged by drugs and alcohol, toxic substances, and any action contrary to the common good.

He went on to say that in ancient times looking upon objects perfect and complete in structure was therapeutic because looking upon them inspired an acceptance of perfect symmetry that positively effects our energy field. And conversely, when we accept discord as inevitable, our energy field is damaged.

For the past hundred years the same families and foundations have created a world of chaos and discord. And perhaps Terrain theory is correct, and the ancients were right, and we have been given a perfect divine vessel that will protect us so long as we look after it and live in accordance with the common good.

Don’t miss this powerful report on the links between the Texas Wild Fires and Directed Energy Weapons:

---

16-year-old German girl treated like criminal over post professing love for her homeland

Billionaire Elon Musk has spoken out in the case of 16-year-old schoolgirl Loretta B., who was pulled out of her classroom by police last week because of a TikTok post in support of the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party.

At the end of February, the girl was taken out of class in front of her fellow students and questioned by police, as first reported by German newspaper Junge Freiheit.

In her TikTok post, she asked “What do Germany and the Smurfs have in common: They are both blue.” The post was in reference to the AfD, which has blue party colors.

She had also shared a post that stated that Germany was not just a place on the map, but also home for her.

In response to the story, Elon Musk asked in disbelief, “Really, that’s all?”

In an interview with Junge Freiheit, Loretta B. told the paper that when she was pulled out of class by the police, “I felt everyone’s piercing stares on me.”

The Brandenburg police then spread disinformation following the event, claiming the mother and daughter understood the police actions, with their statement reading: “The student showed understanding of the police measures and the preventive approach behind them, as that was what was important to her to protect against possible hostilities that could arise from their activities on social networks.”

The mother said this was a lie, and that “I was totally horrified. There is nothing criminal about the video and yet my daughter is treated like a criminal.”

The principal of the Richard-Wossidlo-Gymnasium in Ribnitz-Damgarten initially called the police over the girl’s TikTok posts. The police told Junge Freiheit that they had conducted “a kind of endangerment talk” with the student. The mother, Annett B. said her daughter was targeted due to political motives, saying, “My daughter was to be made an example of!”

The Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania “Security and Public Order Act” does not include the provisions that exclude speech based on public disorder risk. However, in Baden-Württemberg’s law, for example, it is applied on the assumption that “a person will disrupt public safety within a foreseeable period of time.”

The police operation caused outrage across Germany. Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania’s minister of the interior had recently defended his officers. “If someone then says: ‘I know the limits’, then it’s all the better,” the politician emphasized on Thursday in the Schwerin state parliament with regard to 16-year-old Loretta.

---

Alex Jones Warns – Beware the Ides of March

Local news cameras were on the scene to film the situation

ABC New York‘s “Eyewitness News” investigative team captured alarming footage of a homeowner dealing with squatters living in her home before eventually being arrested by police for being on her own property.

Adele Andaloro inherited her family’s home in Flushing, Queens, and was preparing to sell the house when she discovered people living inside.

The group living in the home had the locks on the doors changed so Andaloro couldn’t enter.

The homeowner reached out to the local news outlet to see if they’d like to bring attention to the situation and they ended up filming a shocking encounter.

As Andaloro and the news crew stood outside the home, a woman approached the front door and unlocked it before fleeing upon seeing the cameras.

Since the door was unlocked, the homeowner went inside and discovered two men living in the house where her furniture and personal belongings still sat.

After an exchange of words, police were called and the two men were removed from the property.

Andaloro had a locksmith waiting nearby and had the door locks changed, but about ten minutes later the squatters came back and forced their way into the home.

Despite having the deed to the home on her person, police officers arrested the homeowner for “unlawful eviction” when the squatters called the cops on her.

“I am being arrested for being in my own home,” Andaloro told the news cameras as she was handcuffed. “My deed is current and legal.”

Neither police officers or the “Eyewitness News” team were provided a lease by the home’s occupants, and now both parties will be forced to play the waiting game as it could take up to two years to solve an eviction case in New York.

These types of situations appear happening more often as word spreads of eviction loopholes and they could explode in magnitude if the millions of illegal immigrants coming into America get wind of the scam.

People on social media criticized America’s unfolding eviction crisis:

---

Buckingham Palace has been forced to issue a statement confirming that King Charles III is still alive after Russian media announced on Monday that the British monarch had died. The Russian statement, dated March 18 […]

The post Buckingham Palace Deny Reports That King Charles Is Dead After ‘Announcement’ By Russian Media appeared first on The People’s Voice.

Warmongering senator disappointed Ukraine conscription age is 27

On his latest of far too many visits to Ukraine, Sen. Lindsey Graham on Monday urged legislators to expand the pool of citizens subject to being drafted and thrown into the country’s losing war against Russia,saying, “We need more people in the line.” 

The Ukrainian military accepts voluntary enlistments from those 18 and older. However, in stark contrast to Americans’ experience with military drafts, Ukraine exempts men under 27 from being conscripted. Since December, the country’s legislature has been considering lowering the minimum draft age to 25, to meet the military’s projected need for upwards of a half-million more soldiers. 

“I would hope that those eligible to serve in the Ukrainian military would join. I can’t believe [conscription age starts] at 27,” Graham told the press. “You’re in a fight for your life, so you should be serving — not at 25 or 27.”

Of course, Ukrainians are generally only “fighting for their lives” once they’re shipped east to fight an American-cultivated proxy war over territory that, as David Stockman puts it, “has been either a Russian vassal or appendage for centuries and where the term ‘Ukraine’ actually means ‘borderlands’ in Russian.”

On a trip to Ukraine last May, Graham gleefully crowed that “the Russians are dying” and that aid to Zelensky’s government is “the best money we ever spent.” 

For at least a decade, Graham has been a chief Senate cheerleader for military aid to Ukraine. In February, however, he made an abrupt about-face, opposing the latest White House request for outright aid and instead embracing former President Trump’s position that future help should come in the form of loans. “I talked to President Trump today and he’s dead set against this package,” Graham said on the Senate floor when announcing his momentous opposition to a $60 billion aid bill. 

In Kiev this week, Graham reiterated his advocacy of loans:  

“I was very direct with President Zelensky. You can expect me to always be in your corner, but it’s not unfair for me to ask you and other allies: Pay us back down the road, if you can. I think the loan idea is going to be pretty popular, not just among Republicans but also among Democrats.”

Graham’s “if you can” qualifier speaks volumes, signaling a coming bait-and-switch. He is advocating “no-interest, waivable” loans. The odds they’ll ever be paid back are vanishingly small. In the present, however, the structure gives some cover to politicians facing an American electorate increasingly fed up with throwing money at a war that has nothing to do with US interests. 

With new aid of any kind still stalled — except for the Biden administration resorting to creative accounting maneuvers to magically scare up another $300 million last week — Graham told reporters on Monday that he was “more optimistic than I’ve ever been that something will get out of the House pretty soon.” 

At the same time, Graham told Ukrainians, “No matter what we do, you should be fighting. No matter what we do, you’re fighting for you.” In addition to having postponed elections, the purported beacon-of-freedom Ukraine forbids men between age 18 and 60 from leaving the country. 

Graham is among the most relentless and reckless of DC warmongers, as a sampling of ZeroHedge headlines from just the last year confirms:  

• Watch: Lindsey Graham Says US Should “Start Shooting Russian Planes Down”
• Sen. Lindsey Graham Says He Would Support Sending American Troops to Taiwan
• Lindsey Graham Says “Only Way” To Keep Hamas-Israel From Escalating Is To Attack Iran’s Oil
• Lindsey Graham Urges Biden To Blow Iran “Off The Map” Over Red Sea Attacks

He isn’t quite a full-fledged chickenhawk: He served 33 years as an Air Force and USAF Reserve officer — but as a lawyer. His mobilization for the first Gulf War saw him dispatched not across the world but to a National Guard base in his home state of South Carolina where he churned out wills for service members deploying to the war zone.   

---

Alex Jones Warns – Beware the Ides of March