Pathetic: MSNBC Host Mocked For Crying Over Jan. 6
An MSNBC host cried over January 6 in a cringe stunt during his live show and was ridiculed as a result.
Jonathan Capehart was talking with former D.C. police officer Michael Fanone on Saturday about his new book on the anniversary of the January 6 riot when he began blubbering.
“I’m going to try to get through this…erm…” stuttered Capehart as he appeared to wipe tears from his face.
Oh my God
— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) January 6, 2024
An MSNBC anchor is straight up CRYING on air over the third anniversary of January 6th
This is your “media”, America
How pathetic pic.twitter.com/e5q5Wu1OUo
“Thank you for what you did three years ago today,” he added with a quivering voice.
Fanone awkwardly continued on, claiming the “insurrection” of Jan. 6 is still going on today within Trump’s America First movement.
“We are still in the midst of the same fight that began on January 6, 2021 and we have a lot at stake in this country and I think that it deserves every American’s attention,” he said.
Capehart’s theatrics were roundly mocked on social media.
“Whatever they are hysterical about is what they are lying about” Tucker Carlson
— Gimme3Steps (@TheSouthGAJohn) January 6, 2024
This is either acting, mental illness or both.
— Paul A. Szypula ?? (@Bubblebathgirl) January 6, 2024
What’s happening at the border right now is infinitely worse than J6.
The media doesn’t even report on the border invasion let alone cry about it.
Give me a break.
You need to be more of an actor than a serious reporter at MSNBC
— Old School Eddie (@Old_SchoolEddie) January 6, 2024
Was he crying when the Democrats initiated their 4 years of “Resistance” Insurrection like this on the day that Trump was sworn into office?! https://t.co/3xcSUVduws
— Patriot Ranger (@MAGA_Ranger) January 7, 2024
Omg even the police officer was like wtf are you doing? ?
— Carlos Rincon (@carlitosrincon_) January 6, 2024
He was practicing all night for that moment lol
the cop watching him cry pic.twitter.com/OQnxM1r5LE
— cozy (@cozymaximalist) January 7, 2024
Yet they laughed and celebrated over the “summer of love.”
— Pro Swing Trading ???? (@Pro__Trading) January 6, 2024
These people are such frauds. pic.twitter.com/EWswtyWHLb
The mainstream media are not serious people.
Russian Military Declares Covid Pandemic Was Strategic Operation To Control Humanity
The Covid pandemic was not a pandemic at all, but a global strategic operation to control humanity that was decades in the planning. But don’t take my word from it. That is straight from Moscow, […]
The post Russian Military Declares Covid Pandemic Was Strategic Operation To Control Humanity appeared first on The People’s Voice.
Watch: Toronto Police Deliver Coffees to Pro-Hamas Activists Blocking a Bridge
Footage from Toronto, Ontario shows police hand-delivering a box of hot Tim Horton’s coffee to Hamas supporters who were blocking a bridge near a Jewish neighborhood on Saturday.
Instead of arresting the pro-Hamas protesters who were blocking traffic, the Toronto police essentially became their errand boys.
“When the pro-Hamas activist is asked how he got coffees from the police, he said someone had bought them for him but police refused to allow them onto the bridge. So, in effect, the policeman became the DoorDash delivery man for these terrorist sympathizers,” the Right Scoop reported.
Police deliver box of Tim Hortons coffee to protesters on behalf of those who cannot join the highway overpass. #cdnpoli #Toronto #Palestine #Israel #Gaza #ProtestMania pic.twitter.com/tAzaEFxFM4
— Caryma Sa’d – Lawyer + Political Satirist (@CarymaRules) January 6, 2024
However, Toronto police appeared to have no issue blocking media from covering the traffic disruption.
I’m trying to get to the anti-Israel protest in a Jewish neighbourhood in Toronto and police won’t even allow media onto the bridge. pic.twitter.com/l5nhr3Os3T
— Beth Baisch ? (@BethBaisch) January 6, 2024
Toronto Police Service spokesperson Laura Brabant defended the department’s actions in now-deleted X posts, saying they were working to “de-escalate” the protests.
“Our officers are managing a dynamic situation. In performing a helpful act today, our officer’s motivation was to help keep tensions low and should not be interpreted as showing support for any cause or group. Our officers continue to work to de-escalate these demonstrations,” she wrote before deleting her entire account.
Quoted tweet from Officer Laura Brabant of Toronto Police Service has been deleted, but screenshot is provided below for reference: pic.twitter.com/ZODzGSu24b
— Not Your Kulak (@inakomysliachii) January 7, 2024
“Officers in Toronto are often publicly criticized for heavy handed tactics used during demonstrations. Today, given a very dynamic situation, officers continued to work to de-escalate these demonstrations and maintain calm and the public’s safety.”
Here’s the now deleted tweet and account from the TPS comms person Laura Brabant on the justification for the coffee delivery???? pic.twitter.com/8qkbkwKdpr
— Miriam Edison (@AnneMcI55800645) January 7, 2024
Liberal MP Marco Mendicino, who represents the area where the protest took place, criticized the police serving refreshments to the anti-Israel demonstrators.
“Good intentions aside, police serving coffee and food to protestors will just embolden more deliberate obstruction of traffic, undermine public safety, and add to local frustrations. Laws exist to prevent this. They need to be enforced!” he wrote Saturday.
Good intentions aside, police serving coffee and food to protestors will just embolden more deliberate obstruction of traffic, undermine public safety, and add to local frustrations. Laws exist to prevent this. They need to be enforced! pic.twitter.com/s7znCf3gt5
— Marco Mendicino (@marcomendicino) January 6, 2024
Fellow Liberal MP Anthony Housefather echoed Mendicino’s remarks, calling Toronto Police’s actions a “poor decision.”
“Police bringing food and coffee to demonstrators in the current context of the protests in Toronto was a very poor decision by @TorontoPolice. Unless the goal is to further undermine confidence in the way the force is handling the demonstrations.”
Police bringing food and coffee to demonstrators in the current context of the protests in Toronto was a very poor decision by @TorontoPolice . Unless the goal is to further undermine confidence in the way the force is handling the demonstrations.
— Anthony Housefather (@AHousefather) January 6, 2024
Police in the U.S. similarly responded with kid gloves against anti-Israel activists who launched balloons near the JFK airport on the New Year’s Eve holiday which disrupted 60 flights.
U.S. Attorney Suggests DOJ Will Expand Prosecution of J6 Protesters Who Did Not Enter Capitol
DC US Attorney Matthew Graves gave a speech on Friday suggesting the Department of Justice is preparing to prosecute more Americans for protesting outside the Capitol building on Jan 6.
DC U.S. Attorney Matthew Graves is making clear that the DOJ is now going to target Americans who were around the Capitol on J6 but did not enter the building pic.twitter.com/bj4i3QfHe9
— ALX ?? (@alx) January 6, 2024
From The Post Millennial:
Graves said, that protestors—if they were on restricted Capitol grounds on Jan. 6, 2021, and had not gone in the building—would have “committed a federal crime.”
“We have used our prosecutorial discretion to primarily focus on those who entered the building or those who engaged in violent or corrupt conduct on Capitol grounds,” Graves said in a press briefing on Jan. 4. He then suggested that others who went on the Capitol grounds themselves could be prosecuted.
Jack Posobiec posted online about his comments, saying, “He’s talking about the public lawn of the Capitol,” and then adding, “This is how insane these people are.”
Infowars host Owen Shroyer, who was prosecuted entirely for his speech outside the Capitol, reacted to Graves’ threats on X:
“I warned this was coming. My case was precedent setting,” Shroyer said. “Make no mistake, the message here is: If you’re a Trump supporter, or any right wing anti-establishment candidate, you have no 1st Amendment rights. You will be charged & incarcerated for speaking, reporting or protesting.”
I warned this was coming. My case was precedent setting. Make no mistake, the message here is: If you’re a Trump supporter, or any right wing anti-establishment candidate, you have no 1st Amendment rights. You will be charged & incarcerated for speaking, reporting or protesting. https://t.co/suFrOQwf8y
— Owen Shroyer (@OwenShroyer1776) January 6, 2024
Biden on Friday boasted about pro-Trump protesters being sentenced to 840 years in prison as a collective:
Biden brags about pro-Trump protesters being sentenced to 840 years in prison pic.twitter.com/74YO9qRUvF
— Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) January 5, 2024
“Since [Jan 6], more than 1,200 people have been charged for the assault on the Capitol,” Biden said. “Nearly 900 of them have been convicted or pled guilty. Collectively to date, they have been sentenced to more than 840 years in prison.”
California to Provide Free Sex Changes for Illegal Immigrants
As of last week, California’s taxpayer-funded healthcare system now covers sex changes for illegal immigrants, thanks to legislation recently signed by Governor Gavin Newsom. The cost of the program is expected to top $3 billion.
California became the first state in the US to provide health insurance to all adults regardless of immigration status on January 1, when legislation signed by Newsom last summer came into effect. Approximately 700,000 illegal immigrants will now have their healthcare covered by the state’s taxpayer-funded Medi-Cal insurance system, according to a press release from State Senator Maria Elena Durazo in May.
Among the procedures covered by Medi-Cal are hormone therapy and gender transition surgery, according to a report this week by the Daily Caller, a conservative news outlet.
“Gender affirming care is a covered Medi-Cal benefit when medically necessary,” a 2022 state memo cited by the outlet states. “Requests for gender affirming care should be from specialists experienced in providing culturally competent care to transgender and gender diverse individuals and should use nationally recognized guidelines.”
According to the Transgender Law Center, Medi-Cal should cover “hormone treatment, gender reassignment surgery, and other necessary procedures.”
Newsom’s expansion of the Medi-Cal program will cost California taxpayers an estimated $3.1 billion, according to an Associated Press report from last year. Republican lawmakers criticized the expansion even before it emerged that it would cover transgender surgery, but their criticism turned to ridicule in recent days.
“California is now paying for illegal aliens to get sex changes,” Colorado Rep. Lauren Boebert wrote on X (formerly Twitter) on Friday. “There’s no punchline to this tweet. California is the punchline.”
Newsom has defended the decision to add 700,000 more patients to the program. “In California, we believe everyone deserves access to quality, affordable health care coverage – regardless of income or immigration status,” his office told ABC News. “Through this expansion, we’re making sure families and communities across California are healthier, stronger, and able to get the care they need when they need it.”
Some 300,000 illegal immigrants were caught entering the US from Mexico in December 2023, the highest number on record for a single month. Under President Joe Biden’s controversial ‘Catch and Release’ policy, almost all of these migrants are released into the US with orders to show up at court hearings at a later date. Amid a backlog of more than two million cases, the average wait time for such a hearing stood at 762 days as of last January.
Obama’s Weird New Movie And America’s Extreme Vulnerability To Cyber Attack
There has been a lot of buzz lately about a recently released film by Netflix titled ‘Leave The World Behind’ based on a novel by the same name. The plot revolves around a catastrophic collapse in the US triggered by a cyber attack (and mass drone attack) that shuts down the internet and disrupts the global economy, leading to questions of who might have been behind the sabotage?
The most interesting aspect of the film is not so much the story (which is lackluster at best), but the fact that Barack Obama was so deeply involved in the making of the film as executive producer and as adviser on the script. This has led many people to suggest the movie is actually predictive programming – Propaganda designed to acclimate the masses to the idea of an event that is planned to happen in the near future.
Similar concerns were raised back in 2021 when the World Economic Forum oversaw a “war game” called Cyberpolygon, an event meant to simulate a massive cyber attack on the vulnerable functions of the world-wide web. The reason Cyberpolygon raised so many eyebrows was perfectly understandable; the WEF had also hosted another simulation at the end of 2019 called Event 201. The game, which included the CEOs of some of the most powerful health and media corporations in the world along with numerous government officials, “coincidentally” focused on the outbreak of a global coronavirus pandemic, and it was held only a couple of months before the real thing happened.
In other words, it was as if the globalists at the WEF knew that covid was about to strike.
While Hollywood interpretations of cyber attacks are usually exaggerated in terms of the true effects, there is a very real and considerable threat associated with such a disaster. So-called “experts” in the tech field often dismiss the wider dangers to the internet itself because they have been indoctrinated into believing that the design of the web has too many redundancies. In other words, they act as if it is invincible.
This is not really the case. Though data loss can be prevented through cloud storage, the internet as a mechanism can still be shut down or taken down deliberately for long periods of time.
In the past I have written about a very interesting event that was barely covered by the corporate media called the “Fastly Outage.” In June of 2021 there was an internet outage that led to large swaths of the web going completely dark, including a number of mainstream news sites, Amazon, eBay, Twitch, Reddit. A host of government websites also went down. All this happened when content delivery network (CDN) company Fastly experienced a “bug.” Although Amazon had its website back online within 20 minutes, the brief outage cost the company over $5.5 million in sales.
A content delivery network is a geographically distributed network of proxy servers and their data centers. They make up the what is known as the “backbone” of the internet.
Fastly identified and fixed the problem within two hours and continues to claim the outage had nothing to do with a cyber attack. However, a huge vulnerability for the internet (a center of structural support Carl von Clausewitz would’ve called a “schwerpunkt”) was revealed to the public. A sizable portion of the web is dependent on only a handful of CDN companies, including Fastly.
It is also through collusion with these companies that governments are able to implement an “internet kill switch” in the face of possible civil unrest. A cyber attack would simply remove the government as the arbiter (or act as a false flag scapegoat so the government can avoid blame). But what would really happen if we lost the internet for a week, or a month or a year? In the US the result would be calamity because our economy has become far too dependent on digitization.
Around 10% of US GDP is directly tied to online commerce. This doesn’t seem like much, but a loss of that GDP would send the US into immediate and steep recession. Around 17 million jobs in the US are generated by commercial internet enterprises, and around 38% of these workers are employed by small businesses. According to surveys 70% of American workers say they cannot do their jobs effectively without internet access.
Keep in mind, if the trend of “work from home” during the covid lockdowns had stuck, an even bigger piece of the economy would be dependent on the health of the web.
The five industries considered most vulnerable to cyber attack are public administration, healthcare and pharmaceuticals, finance and insurance, education and retail. That is to say, these are the industries that are attacked most often. Attacks on vital utilities are usually the favorite set pieces for disasters portrayed in fiction and film, but these are actually far less worrisome. The real danger is the potential for an attack on the internet as a system. All it would take is for a couple CDNs or more to be hit simultaneously to cause vast online blackouts.
Most important of all are the ways in which international banking and finance utilize online networks to maintain the flow money. Without the web, trade velocity dies immediately and building it back from implosion could take years.
But who would benefit from such an attack? Certainly, foreign powers might see the crippling of America’s digital infrastructure as a way to severely damage the country without having to fight directly and militarily. However, there are also a number of benefits to the globalists.
For example, one of the biggest obstacles for the elites during their attempt to institute medical tyranny and the ‘Great Reset’ during covid was the proliferation of factual data that debunked the pandemic narrative. American conservatives represented a serious barrier to their success with tens of millions of gun owning patriots refusing to comply. The harder they pushed, the greater the chance of an armed insurgency.
Even though the establishment had every single Big Tech conglomerate on their side when it came to mass censorship of contrary information, they still failed to stop the spread of the truth – Covid was nowhere near the threat they hyped it up to be and the public was quickly made aware of this by the alternative media. The elites did not have as much control over the web as they thought they did.
In the event of a large scale cyberattack, the internet could be shut down completely, leaving only corporate media sources to filter information and control the narrative. The alternative media would be silenced and the public would be left in confusion, desperately searching for answers. Interestingly, this is a core theme of Obama’s ‘Leave The World Behind’ – The idea of a population utterly cut off from reliable information and scrambling to figure out who is attacking them.
The internet has become an integral pillar of western economies to the point that a majority of people would not know how to live without it should it disappear. This is the disturbing reality we face in the midst of a growing series of geopolitical conflicts and more oppressive governments. It would seem it’s only a matter of time before there’s a major disruption.
The solution is pretty straightforward – Localization of trade and production is the way to prevent full spectrum collapse, and alternative communication networks such as ham radio networks can prevent information silence. There is no reason why Americans should have to become subservient to the whims of globalism, the interdependent supply chain or digitization; they can and should create their own backup plan. Getting people to realize this and implement basic local measures is where we run into difficulties. Sadly, a lot of first-world citizens assume that the system will always be there for them when they need it, and they don’t actively seek out solutions until disaster is at their doorstep.