Green Terrorists Are Stealing Property in America’s Heartland to Build Massive Co2 Pipeline Terraforming Machines for Destruction of Photosynthesis on Earth
Summit Carbon Solutions is back at it in Iowa trying to steal private farmland for use in its massive “carbon capture” scam.
The Iowa Utility Board (IUB) reportedly approved a proposal by Summit to build a carbon dioxide (CO2) pipeline that stretches across five Midwestern states: Iowa, Minnesota, Nebraska, North Dakota and South Dakota. The pipeline is slated to cover 2,500 miles – the portion in Iowa is supposed to be 680 miles long – and connect with 57 ethanol plants, a spokeswoman from the company revealed.
The IUB decision will allow Summit to use eminent domain to steal 859 land parcels from private landowners, the vast majority of whom are opposed to the “green” project, which aims to bury CO2 underground so it cannot “pollute” the environment.
“After weighing numerous factors for and against Summit Carbon’s petition, the Board found that the service to be provided by Summit Carbon will promote the public convenience and necessity,” UIB said in its decision.
(Related: Don’t be fooled, conservatives – many Republican politicians are selling out farmers to these “green” energy scams.)
CO2 pipelines are money-grubbing scams – and they’re probably unconstitutional
There are conditions attached to the approval that include forcing Summit to submit revised exhibits for IUB review. Summit will also have to:
1) Obtain and maintain at least a $100 million insurance policy
2) Adhere to specific construction methods
3) Ensure compensation for landowners and tenants for any construction-related damages
4) Receive approval from the other four states involved in the project
“The momentum will continue as we prepare to file our South Dakota permit application in early July,” said Summit CEO Lee Blank. “We look forward to engaging with the state throughout this process and are confident in a successful outcome.”
Those opposed to the project, including hordes of private landowners, say Summit’s CO2 pipeline will only benefit the company while providing no benefits to the public.
“There is a deep-rooted passion for our farm ground in many farmers, and to have something like this rip it apart for something so unnecessary is unimaginable,” said Austin Hayek, a farmer from Fort Dodge, Iowa, who like many of his neighbors fears the pipeline will disrupt his ability to maintain and pass down his farming legacy to the next generation.
Like with all other green scams, carbon pipelines would not even be possible were it not for federal tax credits paid for by U.S. taxpayers. Electric vehicles (EVs), solar panels, carbon pipelines and all the rest exist because of taxpayer-funded subsidies and other benefits not afforded to other industries.
“This is far from over,” commented Jess Mazour, chapter conservation coordinator of the Sierra Club of Iowa, about the UIB approval. “We will appeal this decision and make our arguments in front of a fair decision maker.”
In May 2023, a South Dakota farmer named Jared Bossly won his case against Summit, this being a little silver lining to the whole fiasco. On X, someone wrote that threatened farmers in all of the affected states need to file their own lawsuits against Summit.
“Every farmer needs to post signs with this exact verbiage on their property,” she wrote about the following statement to be posted on farms:
“NO TRESPASSING: Trespassers will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law – No immunity for criminal trespass by government parties.”
Another pointed out just how far America is falling from grace when private companies can successfully declare eminent domain on other people’s private property.
Unless Americans take a stand against these kinds of projects, our entire country will eventually be taken over by green tyrants. Learn more at GreenTyranny.news.
EXCLUSIVE VIDEO: MTG Warns NATO Is Planning WWIII In D.C. Now
More Disabled Canadians are Speaking Out Against Pressure to Choose Assisted Suicide
(LifeSiteNews) — On June 19, I interviewed Roger Foley – a Canadian with disabilities – on my LifeSiteNews podcast on his ugly experience with Canada’s euthanasia regime. Time and again, he told me, he has been proactively offered euthanasia, even after he confessed to feeling suicidal ideation. At his most vulnerable, he was not offered the help he has been asking for – and is fighting for in court – but rather, a lethal injection.
He is not the only one.
On July 4, Montreal CTV reported that Tracy Polewczuk, a woman who suffers from spina bifida, was also offered “MAiD,” or “medical aid in dying,” twice. Her story is nearly identical to Foley’s in all of the details. In 2022, Polewczuk broke her leg in an accident. Spina bifida is a birth defect that causes weak bones, and her broken leg never fully healed, leading to constant pain and daily home care visits from the Pointe-Claire CLSC. Like Foley, she says the care she receives is often perfunctory and her clearly-articulated needs are frequently not addressed.
“They don’t bother asking, like, they know your name, but they don’t address you,” she told CTV. “It’s just so impersonal, and they don’t care. You get up when they tell you to. You go to bed when they tell you. You do what they tell you to. That’s it. You have zero control over your life. And I’ve gotten hurt several times because people won’t listen. Pain sucks. We all agree. It’s terrible. I’m in pain 24/7. It never stops. I can survive that. I cannot survive being treated like a sack of meat.”
Her husband James told CTV that he has frequently been afraid that her circumstances could lead to suicidal ideation. “I had to hide a certain medication that we have enough of that, if she took them, it would end her life. And I hid them,” he said. It was then – when Polewczuk was most vulnerable – that medical professionals informed her that she was “eligible for medical assistance in dying.” CTV reports that it was brought up once by a nurse at the rehabilitation centre at Ste-Anne’s Hospital and a second time by a social worker at the Verdun Hospital.
READ: Canadian hospice society provides ‘Guardian Angels’ to protect patients from euthanasia
“It feels like we are being pushed towards the MAiD program instead of being given the help to live,” Polewczuk said. “I want to survive. I want to thrive. I want my life back. I want the opposite of what they’re trying to have us do.” That is, almost word for word, what Roger Foley told me. He doesn’t want to die, but he feels as if those around him see his life as not worth living and are nudging him, gently but firmly, toward that final “choice” that does not feel like a choice to those who are vulnerable, suffering, and utterly reliant on those around them.
Predictably, the West Island Regional Health Authority declined comment on Polewczuk’s case when asked, stating simply that: “The rules surrounding medical aid in dying are very strict, and we respect them to the letter. The initiative must always come from the patient, not the nursing staff.” But as Dr. Paul Saba, a family doctor, told CTV, suggestions from medical staff are often perceived as recommendations:
What are the circumstances in which those persons have asked it? Are these people at home not being served adequately, not getting a sufficient, not having anyone to help health her or him? My theory is that a lot of those people who have asked and gotten medical help to die, that they might have been in circumstances where they had no other choice.
Stories like these shed a chilling light on the skyrocketing numbers of Canadians who die by euthanasia each year. The Euthanasia Prevention Coalition reported this week that there were approximately 15,280 reported euthanasia deaths in 2023– up more than 15 percent from 2022.
The British Columbia Medical Assistance in Dying 2023 report indicates that there were 2,767 euthanasia deaths, up 10 percent. Among those reported, 2.4 percent were for autoimmune conditions, 24.8 percent were from chronic pain, 9.8 percent were for diabetes, and 60.5 percent were for “frailty.”
EXCLUSIVE VIDEO: MTG Warns NATO Is Planning WWIII In D.C. Now
NATO Makes ‘Historic’ Ukraine Air Defense Pledge
NATO countries said they will provide five additional strategic air defense systems to Ukraine in response to Kiev’s pleas to help fend off persistent Russian airstrikes. US President Joe Biden announced the “historic donation” during the summit in Washington, DC, where NATO leaders gathered on Tuesday to mark the 75th anniversary of the Western alliance.
According to the statement signed by several NATO members and Ukraine, the US, Germany and Romania will donate a new Patriot battery each, while the Netherlands “and other partners” will supply components to “enable the operation of an additional Patriot battery.” Italy has pledged to deliver a new SAMP-T system.
“In addition, in the coming months, the United States and partners intend to provide Ukraine with dozens of tactical air defense systems, including NASAMS, HAWKs, IRIS T-SLM, IRIS T-SLS, and Gepard systems,” the statement read.
Overall, Washington promised to provide Ukraine with “hundreds of additional air defense interceptors over the next year.”
Read more Kremlin reveals position on NATO summit
Addressing the attendees of the summit in Washington, Biden said that the US will prioritize Ukraine in terms of weapons deliveries. “The United States will make sure that when we export critical defense interceptors, Ukraine goes to the front of the line. They will get this assistance before anyone else gets it,” the president said.
Biden reaffirmed the commitment to back Ukraine in its conflict with Russia. “Today NATO is stronger than it’s ever been in its history,” he added.
Kiev has been warning for many months that the number of anti-air systems provided so far is not nearly enough to effectively deter Russian airstrikes, with Ukrainian leader Vladimir Zelensky telling NATO in April that Ukraine needs at least seven additional Patriot batteries or similar weapons. Moscow has reported destroying several Patriot launchers since 2023.
Russia has maintained that the deliveries of Western weapons will lead to more escalation but will ultimately fail to stop the Russian army in Ukraine.
EXCLUSIVE VIDEO: MTG Warns NATO Is Planning WWIII In D.C. Now
Trump Announces Plans to Reject CBDCs, Promote Free Speech in AI, Ban Government Censorship & Defund Censorship Institutions
As the US presidential election draws closer, Republicans and Donald Trump have come out with some key policy pledges, with the big picture message described as “a return to common sense” when it comes to tech.
Among problems like the economy in general, geopolitics, and a variety of trends influencing society, the platform mentions central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), cryptocurrencies, freedom of speech, government involvement in censorship, and AI development.
This party platform was adopted by the Republican National Committee (RNC) and offers promises of reversing some of the most controversial policies endorsed and executed by the current White House.
One is the effort to push for the introduction of a digital dollar (CBDC) – a centralized digital currency that opponents have for a long time rejected as yet another tool to further limit and weaken people’s financial independence and privacy while adding more building blocks into the foundations of mass surveillance.
The way the platform frames this is as Republicans being dedicated to finding future economic progress for their country by becoming a leader in what the document calls emerging industries – but clearly stating that a CBDC does not qualify.
What does, according to the platform, are decentralized cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin, and here the RNC vows to at once end Democrats’ “unlawful and unAmerican crypto crackdown” and, at the same time, oppose a (US) CBDC.
Supporting Bitcoin, the GOP platform states means defending the right to mine the cryptocurrency. Addressing the issue of government meddling in people’s economic sovereignty, the document declares that the party will defend “the right to self-custody of their digital assets, and transact free from government surveillance and control.”
The Biden administration’s AI Executive Order is dismissed as “dangerous,” while a pledge is made that Republicans will back AI development that is based in free speech, and “human flourishing.”
By contrast, the Biden order is seen as putting roadblocks in the path of AI innovation, while at the same time imposing “radical left-wing ideas on the development of this technology.”
And then there’s what some Republicans have shown as a “weaponized government” under the current White House – specifically, one striving to impose ideology and allow for the government to join forces with private tech giants to stifle lawful speech, using this as a political weapon against opponents.
“We will declassify government records, root out wrongdoers, and fire corrupt employees. We will ban the Federal Government from colluding with anyone to censor lawful speech, defund institutions engaged in censorship, and hold accountable all bureaucrats involved with illegal censoring. We will protect free speech online,” the GOP platform states.
EXCLUSIVE VIDEO: MTG Warns NATO Is Planning WWIII In D.C. Now
Biden Wants to Serve Until 2029 – White House
US President Joe Biden is determined to stay in office for a full second term if reelected, according to White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre.
Biden did so poorly in the TV debate with Republican challenger Donald Trump two weeks ago that dozens of media outlets, prominent Democrats, and major party donors urged him to step aside. The 81-year-old has refused, insisting that he can beat Trump in November.
“Does President Biden commit to serving a full second term if reelected?” Jean-Pierre was asked during the White House briefing on Tuesday.
“Yes,” she replied.
Biden himself told MSNBC hosts Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski on Monday that he was “firmly committed” to winning a second term and that he was “not going anywhere.”
Meanwhile, major donors to the Democrats have been discussing “elegant” ways for Biden to drop out of the race, according to the New York Times, while Nobel Prize winner and New York Times columnist Paul Krugman urged him to give way to Vice President Kamala Harris.
Read more Nobel Prize winner urges Biden to drop out
On Tuesday, Politico published a poll showing that Biden would lose the election to Trump, but Hillary Clinton might win. The pollster even said that a Clinton-Harris ticket would be the strongest against Trump, beating the Republican by three percentage points. Clinton has blamed everyone from the FBI to Russia for her loss to Trump in 2016.
Meanwhile, investigative journalist Alex Berenson discovered that a neurologist specializing in Parkinson’s Disease has visited the White House at least eight times since January, pointing to visitor logs as evidence.
Weighing in on the controversy, Trump speculated that Biden would withstand his party’s pressure to drop out.
“It looks to me like he may very well stay in,” Trump said in a phone interview with Fox News host Sean Hannity on Monday night. “He’s got an ego and he doesn’t want to quit. This isn’t necessarily a very positive thing for our country, but I think he might very well stay in.”
Biden declined to run in 2016, after serving two terms as Barack Obama’s vice president. The Democrats settled on him in 2020 as the best choice to challenge Trump. In return, Biden agreed to make Harris his running mate and reportedly told people he would not run again in 2024.
Four sources told Politico in December 2019 that it was “virtually inconceivable” that Biden would run again at 82, while one prominent party strategist said it was “a bit crazy” for him to run at all.
EXCLUSIVE VIDEO: MTG Warns NATO Is Planning WWIII In D.C. Now
George Stephanopoulos Says, ‘I Don’t Think Biden Can Serve Four More Years’ Following ABC News Interview
Joe Biden is unfit to serve another term, according to ABC News’s George Stephanopolous, who recently conducted a sit-down interview with the 81-year-old US president.
The mainstream media operative revealed his sentiments in an unusually candid off-hand comment to a passerby, video of which was obtained by TMZ.
In the video, the passerby asks Stephanopolous, “Do you think Biden should step down? You’ve talked to him more than anybody else has lately.”
“I don’t think he can serve four more years,” Stephanopolous states bluntly.
Following the exchange Stephanopolous informed TMZ he made the comment in error, saying, “Earlier today, I responded to a question from a passerby. I shouldn’t have.”
A representative for ABC noted his comment was not representative of the network, saying, “George expressed his own point of view and not the position of ABC News.”
Stephanopolous’ assessment follows last Friday’s 22-minute interview with Biden, where the president addressed his abysmal debate performance and remained defiant on dropping out of the presidential race.
The former Clinton crony’s comments are reflective of the wider discontent swelling in the Democrat party, where skeptical Democrats in imperiled swing state districts are growing more anxious with Biden leading the ticket.