VIDEO: Putin says he Believes Trump is Sincere About Ending Ukraine War
On Tuesday Alex Jones broke down statements by Vladimir Putin regarding Trump being serious about ending the Ukraine war.
Don’t miss:
EXCLUSIVE VIDEO: MTG Warns NATO Is Planning WWIII In D.C. Now
Left Retains Power in France After Huge Comeback in Second Round of Election
(LifeSiteNews) — The second round of elections for the French National Assembly – the lower chamber of Parliament but the one that wields the most power – was set to offer a near-landslide victory to the only party that can be loosely described as “anti-establishment,” the National Rally.
After unprecedented totals in the first round in which the party obtained the highest percentage nationwide – 29.26 percent and nearly 9,380,000 votes– it was expected to come close to an absolute majority in the 577-member National Assembly.
After the playoffs on Sunday, where the candidate who comes in first wins, the National Rally (RN) ended up with only 125 seats while a left-wing coalition, the New Popular Front, including the Communist Party and the radical left-wing party “La France insoumise” (France Unbowed), acquired 180 seats, meaning the coalition represents the largest political force in the Assembly.
The first lesson of this unprecedented political event in contemporary France is indeed the way in which the National Rally was bereft of a larger victory, leaving a highway open to the left and extreme left.
And it wasn’t only the French electoral system. It is true that if France had a “first-past-the-post” ballot like the UK, the National Rally would have won outright alone with no less than 297 seats – the number of constituencies where it came in first last week, eight more than the majority. French President Emmanuel Macron would have had to make 28-year-old Jordan Bardella, the party’s leader, the country’s prime minister, and an uneasy “cohabitation” between the globalist head of state and Bardella would have ensued.
However, only 37 candidates from the patriotic National Rally won in the first round, and several hundred were expected to come in first in the second round, especially in those places where three candidates would be able to stay in the race after gaining a minimum percentage.
What happened to prevent this was a manipulation of the system – not in any way illegal but totally untrue to reality. The RN, together with a few dozen allies from the center-right Républicains, was faced with two large coalitions: the New Popular Front (a throwback to the left-wing Front Populaire in the 1930s) that included the Communists, radical leftists, socialists and what remains of the ecologists, and “Ensemble” (together), with Macron’s Renaissance party as its pivot, and the rest of the Républicains as a supporting party.
Whirlwind agreements were concluded by both coalitions leading to the voluntary stepping down of a large number of candidates who came in third and who theoretically could have stayed in the race in places where the RN had come in first, giving the latter a good chance of victory.
This “Front Républicain,” or Republican Front, made sure that many RN candidates would find themselves pitted against just one other candidate, supported not only by the radical left and the Macronist “center” but by all the mainstream media and innumerable public celebrities, trendsetters, football players and virtue-signalers.
The strategy worked beyond anything the media and opinion pollsters had forecast. While abstention figures did not grow in this election that saw over 67 percent of voters actually casting their ballots — something that hadn’t happened in decades — left-wingers who routinely decry Macron as a “powdered Jupiter” and a man who despises the ordinary workers, the “people who are nothing” as he once publicly said, voted for his representatives.
Affluent, town-dwelling progressives who have no interest at all in the left’s push for even higher taxation in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development’s record-holding champion of compulsory tax and social contribution levies (46 percent of the GDP) voted for extreme leftist candidates from LFI (France Unbowed). The latter was quick to claim victory on Sunday evening although as a party it only won 75 seats against its largest rival in the New Popular Front, the socialist party with its 66 seats, one being for former President François Hollande.
When Sunday’s vote is broken down, however, the Marine Le Pen and Bardella’s National Rally appears as France’s single largest party by far. It obtained the highest number of votes in the second round nationwide with nearly 8,750,000, or 32,05 percent, doing better than in the first round, although it was competing in fewer constituencies because it had already won 37. On average, the RN needed about 90,000 votes to obtain one seat, the other groups needed only 40,000 to 45,000.
What would have changed if the National Rally had not been ousted in this way? Obtaining power and the right to govern in the current difficult circumstances would not necessarily have been a boon: France is deeply fractured, and it has also been plunged into a spectacularly increased national debt by Macron and his team. The public debt now represents 110 percent of the GDP, France’s credit rating is floundering, and it takes more than what income tax is able to garner each year to pay the interest on the debt. Paying for COVID benefits during lockdowns is just one explanation. Public spending has been higher than income for years and is getting worse. It represents 60 percent of the gross domestic product; far from being a liberal, Macron presides over a predominantly socialist economy.
Despite this dire situation, infighting within the New Popular Front (LFI) has already begun with Jean-Luc Mélenchon as head of LFI clamoring to become prime minister with his promises of unbridled social and “climate spending, while the more moderate left-wingers such as the socialist reject his extreme policies. The centrist “Ensemble” movement hopes to obtain support on both sides of the political spectrum in order to impose a prime minister and government from its ranks. If that happens, Macron’s chess game can be said to have worked, although the structure of the National Assembly has now reached a situation where obtaining majority votes for new bills will become difficult indeed.
Macron’s chess game consisted in dissolving the National Assembly, as is his right, when his party dismally lost the European elections earlier in June. What he wanted was unclear: to gain a true majority he had lost two years ago after his reelection as president? To force the RN into power prematurely in the hope it would burn its wings in the face of the electorate?
Whatever his game, the RN has been laminated in a way that contradicts its nationwide support and success, and his party can play pivot among France’s renewed lawmakers.
Macron’s responsibility in giving the left and extreme left a much larger platform and extra power is one thing that cannot be contradicted. He took the deliberate risk to do so and he made things worse by creating an alliance with the New Popular Front, rejecting the RN as “extremist” with no precise reasons given, and offering a highway to communist and Trotskyist parties at least 100 million deaths caused directly by Communism and who want even more public spending, taxation, abortion, state interference, gender ideology, and mass immigration. It is true that they are promoting the same thing as the centrist liberals but only worse.
It should come as no surprise that up to 48 percent of young people are already voting LFI and that this vote is particularly high in ethnic suburbs. The future is already visible there.
Against this background, the National Rally has its failings, not least the fact that over half of its former 88 National Assembly members voted in favor of the enshrinement of the “freedom” to abort in the French constitution last March. But it does speak clearly on immigration policy and has a patriotic approach to what France stands for, at a point in time where so many ordinary people are feeling overwhelmed by energy prices, the rising cost of living and a general feeling of counting for nothing in the eyes of the so-called “elites.”
Macron has made France ungovernable. For the time being, he has reconducted his own youthful (and openly homosexual) Prime Minister Gabriel Attal for such time as will be needed to “ensure the country’s stability.” Coming from the man who gave a great kick in the anthill by dissolving the National Assembly, this is indeed akin to high art. Macron has already stated that he will do so again as soon as constitutional rules allow: one year from now.
Meanwhile, voices have already been raised, such as François Hollande, to say that one of the most urgent political moves at hand will be to relaunch the euthanasia debate that was cut short by Macron’s dissolution.
In that respect, nothing has changed.
EXCLUSIVE VIDEO: MTG Warns NATO Is Planning WWIII In D.C. Now
A Growing Number of Russians Approve the Use of Nuclear Weapons in Ukraine
A growing number of Russians are expressing readiness to support Vladimir Putin’s potential use of nuclear weapons in Ukraine. According to recent surveys by the Levada Centre, approximately 34 percent of respondents – slightly more than one in three – would either definitely or likely approve of the use of nuclear arms in the conflict.
This marks a significant increase of five percent from a year ago and represents the highest level of support since Putin initiated his controversial military campaign against Ukraine.
The findings reveal a nuanced spectrum of public opinion, with 31 percent firmly against the use of nuclear weapons and an additional 21 percent leaning toward opposition. This upward trend in support for nuclear options is widely attributed to effective messaging from Russian propagandists seeking to rally nationalistic sentiments in favor of such drastic measures.
Putin orders tactical nuclear missile drills
Recent developments have seen Vladimir Putin ordering tactical nuclear missile drills across Russia and in neighboring Belarus, where significant deployments of atomic weaponry have been orchestrated. These maneuvers are part of broader strategic initiatives, potentially involving a revision of Russia’s nuclear doctrine to facilitate more flexible and preemptive use of nuclear capabilities.
(Related: Russian insider Viktor Bout says nuclear WWIII is IMMINENT.)
In parallel with these military exercises, which coincide with geopolitical transitions such as recent changes in leadership in Britain, Russia’s defense forces are actively conducting large-scale nuclear missile drills.
These exercises, including the deployment of Yars missile crews in regions like Irkutsk and Ivanovo, showcase Russia’s capability to swiftly mobilize and demonstrate readiness in response to perceived threats.
Russia’s Ministry of Defense (MoD) has underscored that these drills are part of multi-phased exercises involving tactical nuclear weapons, coordinated closely with Belarusian counterparts.
Activities include electronic missile launches, naval patrols and ground troop movements aimed at simulating real-world scenarios and ensuring operational preparedness.
The heightened military activities and shifting public sentiment reflect a tense geopolitical environment, exacerbated by ongoing international sanctions and diplomatic tensions.
As Russia continues to assert its strategic interests in the region, these developments underscore the volatile nature of current global security dynamics.
According to reports from Interfax and Reuters, the crews operating Yars missile launchers in at least two different regions were tasked with relocating over 100 kilometers (62 miles) and practicing maneuvers such as camouflage and deployment. The ministry also indicated that similar exercises would be conducted by other missile units shortly.
Footage released by the military showcased a mobile launcher navigating forested roads and assuming concealed positions under camouflage to avoid detection.
The earlier tactical nuclear drills held in late May were justified by the MoD as a response to what it deemed as provocative statements and threats from certain Western officials.
This included reported discussions among U.S. and U.K. officials advocating for Ukrainian offensives on Russian territory, purportedly supported by U.S.-supplied weaponry.
Among the concerns raised by Moscow from Western quarters is the prospect of NATO troops being stationed in Ukraine, a proposal initially broached by French President Emmanuel Macron earlier in the year at a security conference in Paris.
Strategic show of strength ahead of NATO summit
These recent nuclear drills with mobile launchers are viewed as a demonstration of readiness and a strategic show of strength ahead of the upcoming NATO summit scheduled from July 9 to 11 in Washington D.C.
The potential accession of Ukraine into NATO is anticipated to be a pivotal topic at the summit, which Moscow perceives as a critical red-line issue.
Despite the U.S. advocating for a pathway for Ukraine’s future NATO membership, a recent letter published by Politico, signed by numerous foreign policy experts, cautions against precipitous promises, arguing that such commitments could escalate tensions and prolong the conflict with Russia.
In essence, these military maneuvers underscore Russia’s stance on regional security and its assertive response to perceived threats from Western geopolitical strategies, especially concerning Ukraine and NATO.
Head over to NuclearWar.news for updates on possible escalations of worldwide conflicts into a nuclear war.
EXCLUSIVE VIDEO: MTG Warns NATO Is Planning WWIII In D.C. Now
George Papadopoulos Warns the Deep State is Selling America out to Communist China & Russia
On the Tuesday show Alex Jones spoke with George Papadopoulos about the future collapse of America.
Don’t miss:
EXCLUSIVE VIDEO: MTG Warns NATO Is Planning WWIII In D.C. Now
Meta Tightens the Reins on Anti-‘Zionist’ Terminology
Meta, the owner of both Facebook and Instagram, has taken a further stance in censoring content that uses the term “Zionists,” particularly in a way that conflates the term with Jewish or Israeli identities.
Previously, the term was tightly regulated only in very explicit instances. However, the revised guidelines now include a broader array of phrases where neither “Jew” nor “Israeli” are specifically mentioned, signaling a significant shift in policy.
The impetus for this policy enhancement came in the aftermath of the attack by Hamas on Israel on October 7, 2023. This event has catalyzed several changes in Meta’s content moderation practices.
In defining “Zionist” usage, Meta acknowledges the complexity of the term, which is often employed in political discourse about Israel and its policies. While Zionism is historically linked to the Jewish movement advocating for a sovereign state in the Middle East, Meta is arguing that its current usage on social platforms can sometimes extend to implicit or explicit antisemitism and has expanded its censorship policies.
According to a blog post from Meta, content that attacks “Zionists” under antisemitic pretenses will now be removed. This includes insinuations of global control or comparisons to animals.
Meta announced that it is also waiting on its Oversight Board to offer guidance on whether to allow comparisons between proxy terms for nationality (including Zionists) and criminals (e.g., “Zionists are war criminals.”).
The World Jewish Congress (WJC) has applauded Meta for its decision to treat the inappropriate usage of the term “Zionist” as a substitute for “Jews” as antisemitic Tier 1 “hate speech.”
World Jewish Congress President Ronald S. Lauder stated, “Meta’s decision is a much-needed advancement in our ongoing fight against online antisemitism and hatred. By recognizing and addressing the misuse of the term ‘Zionist,’ Meta is taking a bold stand against those who seek to mask their hatred of Jews.”
“We appreciate that Meta has truly listened to the voices of Jewish communities that we work with. This policy change will help create a safer, more respectful online environment for everyone. I hope all other platforms will follow Meta’s leadership and take similar action,” added Lauder.
Prior to the policy revision, 73 groups formally expressed their concerns to Meta through a letter. They argued that expanding the policy could improperly label discussions on Zionists—and consequently, Zionism—as inherently antisemitic. They emphasized that equating “Zionist” with antisemitism could mistakenly merge legitimate critiques of Israeli government actions with hate speech.
“This move will prohibit Palestinians from sharing their daily experiences and histories with the world, be it a photo of the keys to their grandparents’ house lost when attacked by Zionist militias in 1948, or documentation and evidence of genocidal acts in Gaza over the past few months, authorized by the Israeli Cabinet, which includes members of the Religious Zionist Party,” the letter read. “And it would prevent Jewish users from discussing their relationships to Zionist political ideology.”
EXCLUSIVE VIDEO: MTG Warns NATO Is Planning WWIII In D.C. Now
Researchers Create World’s First Anode-Free Sodium Solid-State Battery That Can Replace Lithium Batteries in EVs
University of California, San Diego (UCSD) graduate researcher Grayson Deysher and his team have created an affordable and eco-friendly power source: an anode-free solid-state battery to enable fast charging and high energy density. This advancement helps solidify the role of sodium in future battery technologies, paving the way for really sustainable energy solutions.
The group of the Laboratory for Energy Storage and Conversion (LESC) made the groundbreaking discovery, which could be the answer to inexpensive, fast-charging, high-capacity batteries for electric vehicles and grid storage.
Deysher and his team’s findings were published in the monthly peer-reviewed scientific journal Nature Energy. The design of the new battery architecture allows for stable cycling for several hundred cycles. The solid-state design ensures the battery is both safe and powerful.
“Although there have been previous sodium, solid-state and anode-free batteries, no one has been able to successfully combine these three ideas until now,” Deysher said.
Since the anode is removed and sodium is used instead of lithium, the new battery is more affordable and environmentally friendly to produce. The study indicated that anode-free batteries store ions on the electrochemical deposition of alkali metal directly on the current collector, which enables higher cell voltage, lower cost and increased energy density. In traditional batteries, an anode stores ions during charging. While the battery is in use, ions flow from the anode through an electrolyte to a cathode.
“In any anode-free battery, there needs to be good contact between the electrolyte and the current collector,” Deysher further explained.
As liquid electrolytes create a buildup of solid electrolyte interphase that steadily consumes active materials, reducing battery effectiveness over time, the team designed a current collector from aluminum powder. This powder flows like a liquid to surround the electrolyte. During assembly, the powder was densified under high pressure. This formed a solid current collector while maintaining liquid-like contact with the electrolyte. As a result, the battery achieves low-cost and high-efficiency cycling.
“Sodium solid-state batteries are usually seen as a far-off-in-the-future technology,” added Deysher. “But we hope this paper can invigorate more push into the sodium area by demonstrating that it can indeed work well, even better than the lithium version in some cases.”
Deysher and scientist Y. Shirley Meng, principal investigator at LESC and professor at the Pritzker School of Molecular Engineering, have already filed a patent application through UCSD’s Office of Innovation and Commercialization.
English coroner warns about dangers of lithium-ion batteries in e-bikes, e-scooters
A coroner in Bristol, the largest city in south-west England, has called on the government to prevent future deaths related to e-bike and e-scooter fires. He thinks there is a “lack of understanding” about the potential dangers of lithium-ion batteries used in EVs.
On September 2022, Abdul Oryakhel died after falling from the window of his flat on the 16th floor when he tried to escape from a fire caused by the overheating and ignition of a lithium-ion battery pack from an e-bike. His death has been ruled as an accident. Meanwhile, another one was injured with burns whilst also escaping. Two people escaped by crawling out a kitchen window and being rescued by emergency services.
Coroner Maria Voisin said there is, “a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken” and that she understands that “there is currently no British or European standard to control what lithium-ion e-bike batteries and chargers can be sold in the United Kingdom.” She also said that she is aware that other coroners have written similar reports but this only goes to emphasize that preventable deaths continue.
Another coroner named Adam Smith called for tighter regulations on e-bike batteries and charging devices after a father of two lost his life in a fire last year. This was about the incident where Mizanur Rahman, 41, died in a flat fire in March 2023, which the London Fire Brigade said was caused by a faulty lithium e-bike battery on charge.
The coroner recommended that the Office for Product Safety and Standards (OPSS) instigate a “British or European standard to control what lithium-ion e-bike batteries and chargers can be sold in the United Kingdom.”
Last September, the OPSS already published information for consumers on e-bike and e-scooter safety. This included unplugging batteries when charging has finished as well as advice on using manufacturer-recommended batteries and chargers and recommendations to buy from known sellers and check product reviews.
It also issued an “Important Safety Message” in December, which aimed at those looking at buying an e-bike or e-scooter. It recommended only buying from a known seller, always following the manufacturer’s instructions, only using the manufacturer’s recommended battery or charger, always charging in a safe place and never attempting to modify or tamper with a battery.
Check out RoboCars.news to read more news related to electric vehicles.
EXCLUSIVE VIDEO: MTG Warns NATO Is Planning WWIII In D.C. Now