Trans Mass Shooter Planned Killing for Five Years, According to Newly Released Pages from “Tranifesto”
Trans mass-murderer Audrey Hale planned her attack in detail, according to journal entries obtained by The Tennessee Star.
A number of entries from the journal, sometimes dubbed the “tranifesto,” clearly suggest that the attack was planned up to five years in advance.
In an entry from 13 March 2023, just two week before her attack on Covenant Elementary School, Nashville, she wrote, “2 more weeks. Thank f*** I planned to die. Plan in mind. [And a plan to near perfection!].” She also indicated the date she planned to attack the school.
In another entry, she wrote, “For 5 years I planned to die. Now I am finally ready to go.”
The journal contains shocking insights into Hale’s state of mind in the years, months and weeks leading up to the deadly attack that claimed the lives of six individuals, including three nine-year-old children. Hale was eliminated by law enforcement at the scene.
Hale declared herself “the most unhappy boy alive,” claimed to have called a suicide-prevention hotline five times, and wrote extensive about her “imaginary penis.”
She also claimed that she came close to being caught in her preparations for the shooting.
Just weeks before the shooting she wrote “I need a trans doctor.”
She ranted at length about politics, including about transgenderism being criminalized. “God I hate those sh*thead politicians,” she wrote.
The Star was able to review nearly 50 notebook pages from Hale’s controversial journal, whose release authorities, including the FBI, have attempted to block.
Michael Patrick Leahy, editor-in-chief of The Star, and Star News Digital Media, Inc., which owns and operates The Star, are currently involved in litigation attempting to force the release of the journal. Entries have been leaked to The Star and other news outlets.
Other recent revelations concerning the shooting include that Hale may have used federal Pell Grant money to buy weapons used in the mass shooting, and that she was treated extensively for psychiatric problems at Vanderbilt University Medical Center.
EXCLUSIVE: Canadian Gov. Attempts To Euthanize Woman Paralyzed By COVID Shots
Gaza to ‘Look Like Playground Compared to Lebanon’ If Israel-Hezbollah Standoff Spirals
If current Israel-Lebanon tensions were to spiral out of control, this could “impose a heavy toll on both countries in this conflict,” Joseph Helou, assistant professor of political science and international affairs at the Department of Social and Education Sciences at the Lebanese American University, told Sputnik.
From the outset of the Arab-Israeli conflict in 1948, the entire Middle East has been, to varying degrees, a powder keg fraught with continuous rounds of conflict, he noted, adding that now the Israeli prime minister “seems to be making aggressive moves to render future conflicts very costly in terms of human lives and material losses.”
Israel is “prepared for an extremely powerful action in the north” against Hezbollah, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu warned on June 5, amid an escalation of cross-border skirmishes, which have included Hezbollah drone attacks inside Israel and the shootdown of a heavy Israeli drone over Lebanese airspace. Netanyahu spoke in the northern city of Kiryat Shmona, which has been evacuating civilians amid the fighting. The PM vowed to “bring back security,” as he referenced the Axis of Resistance, which includes Hezbollah in Lebanon, Syria, Iraqi Shia militias, and Yemen’s Houthis.
Looking at the dynamics of the escalation, he recalled that after the Palestinian-Israeli conflict spiraled in the wake of the attack by Hamas in October last year, there was only limited military border skirmishes between Hezbollah and Israel. Hezbollah claimed it was its way of offering a “supportive front for Gaza,” claiming that the group would end the combat once the war on Gaza is terminated.
Once Israel struck the Iranian Consulate in Damascus, Syria, on April 1, and intensified attacks on villages in southern Lebanon, Hezbollah beefed up its own drone attacks. Recent developments have shown that Hezbollah possesses advanced techniques to command operations via Iran-made drones, the scholar said, and recalled that “Hezbollah officials have publicly stated that only part of their military panoply has been used” so far.
“Hezbollah has developed enormous capabilities in terms of techniques and military strategies, not only weaponry, which makes a conflict between two strong actors quite destructive,” the pundit remarked.
Stopping short of speculating on the sort of operations that Israel would be capable of carrying out in the northern regions of the country and in southern areas of Lebanon, the professor stressed:
“Increased capabilities on both sides of the conflict places the situation on high alert, rendering any real impact assessment of military operations very tentative.” He noted that Hezbollah has “bypassed and even destroyed Israeli defenses on several occasions.”
“This qualitative improvement has shifted the type of operations in the conflict, rendering the next episode of this ongoing war very hard to anticipate,” Joseph Helou said. According to him, this requires the international community to intervene to avoid further dangerous escalation. Prolonged peace is only possible if a two-state solution becomes reality, Helou emphasized.
An independent Palestinian state, negotiated with “a wide array of international support, could help bring about some semblance of order in a chaotic Middle East,” he added. There is also a need to engage Iran in international diplomatic efforts towards a peaceful outcome, the expert said, as Tehran “possesses stakes in the conflict through their support of Hezbollah and other regional proxies.”
“This international political sponsorship for the resolution of the conflict does not currently dominate the political horizon. It has yet to be achieved. But without such backing, the Middle East is unlikely to witness an end to the Arab-Israeli conflict,” Joseph Helou noted.
Gaza will “look like a playground compared to Lebanon” if the current escalation “results in Iran trying to help Hezbollah and Lebanon,” Dr. Shaul Bartal, a retired lieutenant colonel and researcher at Israel’s Bar-Ilan University’s Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies, told Sputnik.
He noted that a further regional war may “end in the destruction of entire regions in Israel, but also in colossal destruction in Lebanon and Iran.”
Currently, Israel’s goal in the standoff with Hezbollah is to remove the Lebanese Shiite movement from the border “as far as beyond the Litani River, and even beyond a range of 10-15 km,” Dr. Bartal remarked. If there is a political agreement with the Lebanese government according to which only its army is allowed to operate in southern Lebanon and Hezbollah is removed from the border, then “the war in the north will end,” he noted.
However, failing that, in a further tit-for-tat, Hezbollah “could use the 150,000 missiles it has against Israel,” while Tel Aviv, in turn, would wreak “enormous destruction” upon Lebanon.
“The only solution to the current crisis is a political agreement between Israel and the Lebanese government that keeps Hezbollah away from the border. An agreement whose principles are already known and accepted by the parties, but Hezbollah insists on not signing it as long as the war in Gaza continues,” Dr. Bartal summed up.
Germany To Start Forcibly Deporting Dangerous Migrants After Cop Dies In Stabbing
In response to last weekend’s terrorist stabbing at a counter-Jihad meeting in Mannheim which left one officer dead – and a second stabbing of an AfD politician in the same city, (and not years of terrorist attacks, having to close public pools and double-digit increases in crime among non-Germans), Chancellor Olaf Scholz – a leftwing social democrat, announced a new ‘zero tolerance’ program which will deport criminal migrants or those “who venerate them.”
“Anyone who threatens our freedom and disturbs our peace should be afraid,” Scholz said in in a Thursday speech at the Bundestag, where he announced that foreigners who commit serious crimes in Germany are no longer welcome – regardless of whether they’re refugees or seeking asylum, The Spectator reports.
The Chancellor announced that the German Ministry of the Interior is drawing up plans to make it easier to deport foreign-born dangerous individuals and serious criminals to their home countries, even if they come from warzones or countries controlled by authoritarian regimes such as Afghanistan and Syria. ‘Such criminals should be deported – even if they come from Syria and Afghanistan,’ Scholz confirmed.
“In such cases, Germany’s security interests outweigh the interest of protecting the perpetrator,” Scholz declared, adding “Anyone who takes advantage of our protection, like the perpetrator in Mannheim, has forfeited our protection. There is zero tolerance for that’. They must ‘feel the full force of the law.”
What’s more, Scholz added that “Anyone who glorifies terrorism is going against all of our values and should be deported.”
Of course, in January Scholz slammed an alleged suggestion by an Austrian politician at an AfD meeting that Germany should deport “unassimilated” migrants (which AfD has made clear is not party policy),” calling it a “diabolical plan,” and saying “The thought of it sends shivers down one’s spine.”
Chancellor Olaf Scholz slammed plans by far-right groups in Germany to deport people with a migration background.
— DW Politics (@dw_politics) January 19, 2024
“The thought of it sends shivers down one’s spine,” the chancellor said of what he called a “diabolical plan.” pic.twitter.com/kvkQ7P6lrz
Scholz, Sunak and… Trump?
Germany’s new policy echoes that of British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak’s deportation scheme which will send Rwandan asylum seekers back to their country to have their claims processed. While Sunak’s plan is aimed to broadly deter migrants from Rwanda, Scholz is only focusing on migrants who have, or want to, or support committing crimes.
Meanwhile, after the Biden administration welcomed what’s estimated to be in the tens of millions of illegal migrants into the United States, former President Trump says that if he wins the November election, he’ll begin mass deportations – including those trying to “bring jihadism or anti-Americanism or antisemitism to campuses.”
??TRUMP: I’LL DEPORT EVERYONE I CAN!
— Mario Nawfal (@MarioNawfal) January 14, 2024
“As soon as I take the oath of office, I’ll terminate every open border policy of the Biden administration and begin the largest deportation operation in American history.”
Source: RSBN pic.twitter.com/fyBIyYxDWJ
Trump promises to “immediately deport” foreign students participating in anti-Israel protests.
— Oli London (@OliLondonTV) May 12, 2024
“If you come here from another country and try to bring Jihadism or anti-Americanism or antisemitism to campuses we will immediately deport you. pic.twitter.com/JlkMlNXqT9
That said, according to Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), Trump will “deport hundreds of thousands of people” living illegally in the United States.
The cartels will keep coming until they see people leaving.
— Lindsey Graham (@LindseyGrahamSC) June 4, 2024
The only real way to fix this problem is mass deportations. Any other “solution” is a bandaid on a much larger wound. pic.twitter.com/qDbVm3frsQ
Back to Germany
According to The Spectator, Scholz’ policy has been in the works since at least early 2023 following a terror incident in Brokstedt, North Germany in which a Palestinian man attacked passengers on a train in Brokstedt, northern Germany, killing two teenagers and injuring several others.
Germany spox Maximilian Kall went further into detail on the new policy, saying that there are currently 480 individuals classified as ‘dangerous’ by the German government who would be eligible for deportation. He did not elaborate on how many criminals will now fall under the new policy at this stage.
Kall clarified that it would not be a case of deciding whether to either deport or imprison criminals of foreign nationality in Germany. These individuals would still be required to serve most of their sentences in Germany first before being deported.
Scholz’s policies will reverse current German law which, in line with the Geneva convention on human rights, prohibits the deportation of individuals to their home countries if they are warzones or if they are at risk of death, torture or inhumane treatment upon their return. Germany ceased deportations to Afghanistan in 2021 following the Taliban’s take-over of the country. -The Spectator
According to the report, Scholz’s new plan will take some time to implement (shocker!), because among other things, it will ‘require the cooperation of foreign governments and regimes such as the Taliban to accept their nationals back.’
What’s more, Scholz did not elaborate on the logistics of his plan when pressed by the Green party.
Vivek: ‘Lunatics’ in Washington Seeking Regime Change in Russia
US involvement in the conflict between Moscow and Kiev is not about “defending Ukraine,” but rather an attempt to force regime change in Russia, former Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy has claimed.
Ramaswamy warned that US President Joe Biden and the “bipartisan warmonger caucus” are preparing for a war with Moscow in order to achieve their ultimate goal.
“These lunatics are starting to sound like they want full-on offense on Russia. It’s lunacy,” he wrote on X (formerly Twitter) on Saturday, while sharing an interview he gave to Fox News host Laura Ingraham, in which they discussed US involvement in the Russia-Ukraine conflict.
Ramaswamy agreed with Ingraham’s remarks that the White House is “getting ready for a war with Russia,” with an “offensive push inside Russia to defeat [Russian President] Putin” and overthrow the government, warning that Washington should beware of the consequences of its actions.
“Victoria Nuland may not be in the building anymore, but that’s still the same spirit that pervades the State Department and beyond,” the politician said, referring to the recently retired under secretary of state for political affairs, who was a key figure behind the Ukraine crisis which started with the Maidan coup ten years ago. She has been an ardent proponent of supporting Ukraine through military means, calling for targeting Russian territory with NATO weapons. He argued that regime change has been Washington’s main focus all along and is “the reason they never stated the war aim in Ukraine.”
“There was not a war goal that has been articulated, in part, because it allows the people who pull the strings to count for regime change as the ultimate goal they are planning for,” Ramaswamy explained.
“You have to be careful what you wish for if you are going to root for regime change in Russia,” he warned, pointing out that the US has “played this game before” and essentially failed. “This road does not end in a place that advances American interests,” the former GOP candidate continued, adding that securing a “reasonable deal” to resolve the conflict is the right way to go.
Last week, Washington and several allies granted permission to Kiev to use Western-supplied weapon systems to strike deeper inside Russian territory, which Moscow regards as a significant escalation that could spark an “asymmetric” response.
While Biden insists that it is “unlikely” that the move will escalate Western involvement in the conflict, Russian President Vladimir Putin has warned that it could lead to “very serious problems,” suggesting that Moscow could even supply “similar weapons” to regions of the world where they will be used against sensitive sites of these Western countries.
Austrian Defense Minster: Western Permission to Strike Targets in Russia Crosses Red Line
Austrian Defense Minister Klaudia Tanner said that allowing Ukraine to strike targets in Russia using Western-donated weapons crossed a red line.
“The red line was crossed. That is why I am very happy about the clarification from NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg that NATO will not send troops to Ukraine,” Tanner said on Saturday in an interview with Austrian newspaper Die Presse.
The comment came after recent decisions by the US and some of its allies to allow Ukraine to use US- or Europe-supplied weapons to strike targets across the internationally recognized borders of Russia for counter-fire purposes.
Western countries have also been discussing sending troops or military instructors to Ukraine.
Western countries have been providing massive military and financial aid to Kiev since the start of Russia’s military operation in Ukraine in February 2022.
The Kremlin has consistently warned against continued arms deliveries to Kiev, saying it will lead to an escalation of the conflict.
Infowars on the Edge: Alex Jones Gives a Bankruptcy Update
New Texas GOP Platform Calls for Secession Vote, Resistance to Federal Infringements
Reflecting plummeting patience with overstepping federal overlords, the Texas Republican Party has adopted two platform planks that call for legislators to assert state sovereignty, and to schedule a secession referendum in the next general election after November’s.
“This historic vote at the 2024 Republican Party of Texas Convention represents a substantial shift towards enhancing state sovereignty and exploring the potential for Texas to operate as an independent nation,” said the Texas Nationalist Movement (TNM) in a statement. “It reflects the growing sentiment among Texans for greater autonomy and the protection of our rights against federal overreach.”
Fittingly, that historic vote took place in San Antonio — home of the Alamo, aka “the cradle of Texas liberty.” Though it represented a setback, the 1836 Battle of the Alamo was a key chapter in the fight for independence that culminated in Texas becoming a self-governing republic.
The first plank asserts that the US government is infringing on powers reserved to Texas and all other states, and calls for unwarranted federal laws to be thwarted by Texas government. It also affirms the right of Texas to secede:
“Pursuant to Article 1, Section 1, of the Texas Constitution, the federal government has impaired our right of local self-government. Therefore, federally mandated legislation that infringes upon the 10th Amendment rights of Texas shall be ignored, opposed, refused, and nullified.
Texas retains the right to secede from the United States, and the Texas Legislature should be called upon to pass a referendum consistent thereto and pass the Texas Sovereignty Act as filed in the 88th Legislative Regular Session as HB 384.”
The second plank is a pointed directive to put the question of secession to the people of Texas in the next general election:
“The Texas Legislature should pass a bill in its next session requiring a referendum in the next General Election for the people of Texas to determine whether or not the State of Texas should reassert its status as an independent nation. This referendum should be a legislative priority.”
From the San Antonio convention, here’s a brief but interesting clip of the Texas Nationalist Movement’s Nate Smith speaking in support of the independence-minded platform planks — and ably fielding a question from a delegate who suggests TNM is guilty of treason.
We’d have liked to hear Smith answer his critic’s attempted second question — as to whether Smith had recited the Pledge of Allegiance earlier that day as part of convention rituals. It’s likely the questioner would have next pointed to the pledge’s reference to “one nation…indivisible.”
In making a case for why patriots shouldn’t pledge allegiance, Brian McGlinchey has argued that, of several objectionable components of the pledge, “‘indivisible’ should give greatest offense to American patriots. The very existence of the United States — created by secession from the British empire — is a testament to political divisibility as a foundational human right…By reciting the Pledge of Allegiance and proclaiming the United States of America ‘indivisible,’ Americans disclaim their human right of self-determination.”
The Texas Nationalist Movement’s GOP convention success comes on the heels of a state Republican Party controversy over the issue. Despite TNM having amassed more than 139,000 signatures requesting that a secession question be placed on the March 5 primary ballot, the Texas GOP’s leadership refused to include it. TNM appealed to the state supreme court, which refused to hear the controversy.
The party chair who presided over that decision, Matt Rinaldi, is out. Now, party’s top two officials are both signers of the “Texas First Pledge.” In addition to promising to place the interest of Texans “before any other nation, state, political entity, organization, or individual,” signatories commit to bringing about a secession referendum and, if it is approved by a majority of Texans, to work for an expeditious exit from the union.
The TNM is constantly looking for new members to join our ranks.
— Texas Nationalist Movement (TEXIT) (@TexasNatMov) June 7, 2024
If you want to pledge your support for TEXIT, you can do so here: https://t.co/2CLOGuWMtQ.
After seceding from Mexico, Texas was an independent country from 1836 to 1845 and, economically, is extraordinarily well-suited for independence today. It’s by far the largest oil producer of any US state, accounting for a whopping 42% of American production, with no other state exceeding even 10%. It has deep-water ports, abundant agriculture, and is a major high-tech hub.
There’s fixin’ to be another feather in Texas’s hat. As we examined earlier this week, the booming Lone Star State economy — and rising aggravation over compliance costs and woke regulations — has spurred BlackRock, Citadel Securities and other investors to back a new challenger to the New York Stock Exchange and Nasdaq: the Texas Stock Exchange.