News

Kennedy’s son appears to have posted the now-deleted video online.

Footage of presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. talking on the phone with presidential frontrunner Donald Trump was leaked online this week.

Trump after the assassination attempt discussed how he agrees with RFK Jr. on vaccines:

“I agree with you, man. Something’s wrong with that whole system, and it’s the doctors you find.

Remember I said I want to do small doses. Small doses. When you feed a baby, Bobby, a… pic.twitter.com/gDpYUuNTjQ

— End Tribalism in Politics (@EndTribalism) July 16, 2024

Speaking about Kennedy’s beliefs on the corrupt U.S. medical industry, Trump said, “I agree with you, man. Something’s wrong with that whole system, and it’s the doctors you find.”

The 45th President pointed out there are “like 38 different vaccines” for babies nowadays and said some of them look like their meant “for a horse,” not a 10-pound baby.

“And then you see the baby starting to change radically. I’ve seen it too many times,” Trump said, adding, “And then you hear that it doesn’t have an impact, right?”

This shows Trump is clearly aware of the many children who are being harmed by “routine” vaccinations.

Continuing, the 2024 Republican nominee appeared to offer Kennedy a role in his administration, saying “I would love you to do something and I think it would be so good for you, and so big for you. You now, we’re gonna win. We’re way ahead of the guy.”

Trump told RFK that Biden called him after Saturday’s attempted assassination and asked him how he knew to turn his head just before the bullet was fired.

“I just turned my head to show the chart And something wrapped me, it, it felt like the world’s largest mosquito. And it was, it was a bullet,” Trump said.

RFK Jr. posted a message on X apologizing for the conversation going public, writing, “When President Trump called me I was taping with an in-house videographer. I should have ordered the videographer to stop recording immediately. I am mortified that this was posted. I apologize to the president.”

When President Trump called me I was taping with an in-house videographer. I should have ordered the videographer to stop recording immediately. I am mortified that this was posted. I apologize to the president.

— Robert F. Kennedy Jr (@RobertKennedyJr) July 16, 2024

According to screenshots, Kennedy’s son Bobby Kennedy III posted the video online, writing, “I am a firm believer that these sort of conversations should be had in public… If I violated some kind of law in posting this my only wish is to have Dr. Anthony Fauci as my cellmate.”

Bobby may have been triggered his father was not selected as Trump’s running mate.

He wrote, “He could have picked a unity ticket instead he picked JD ‘fire all the unvaccinated nurses’ Vance. Two parties, indivisible, under Pfizer, with liberty and justice for sum.”

Once it’s out there, kids, ya can’t take it back…

Lots to take in, here… https://t.co/gwBP2I2JSK pic.twitter.com/c7gznciXoZ

— Jesse Matchey (@JesseMatchey) July 16, 2024

Did RFK’s son just ruin his opportunity to land a job in the Trump administration?

---

“I can’t believe we live in a society where your child can be taken away from you simply for trying to protect her,” the parents told ADF International.

A Swiss couple is taking legal action to regain custody of their 16-year-old daughter, who has been a ward of the state since last year following a disputed diagnosis of gender dysphoria. They claim doctors have been trying to administer puberty blockers to their daughter without their consent. The parents have already spent tens of thousands on court cases. 

The couple is now working with the Christian legal advocacy group Alliance for Defending Freedom (ADF) in a legal case to bring their daughter home, aiming to set a precedent against Europe’s influential transgender lobby. The parents are appealing a court order to produce documents that would allow their daughter to apply for a change of the “legal sex” in the civil register.

The ordeal began in 2021 when their then 13-year-old daughter, known only as “C” to protect her identity, told the family she wanted to ‘transition’ to male, despite not having shown “any signs before,” according to her father. The girl had previously experienced other mental health issues.

After consultations at a local hospital in Geneva, “C” was officially diagnosed with gender dysphoria, despite a private psychiatrist hired by the family disagreeing with the diagnosis. The doctors told the parents their daughter should take puberty blockers, which the parents refused, choosing instead to get private mental health care for their child.

Her parents believe their daughter’s condition was influenced by isolation and time spent online during the pandemic. 

 “C” then requested to ‘socially transition’ (change her name and pronouns) at her private school—again, against her parents’ wishes. The Cass Review, published in the UK earlier this year, shows that ‘social transition’ often paves the way for irreversible physical intervention such as puberty blockers, hormone treatment, and surgical alteration of the body.

In the spring of 2023, the school psychologist who had seen the teen claimed she feared “suicidal acts” if “C” was not allowed to ‘transition,’ and alerted child protection authorities. The school also liaised with a transgender charity, Le Refuge.

After a meeting between the parents and child welfare agency Service de Protection des Mineurs(SPMI)—in which the parents were accused of abuse for not going along with what the authorities suggested—“C” was removed from the home, hospitalised, and put into a government shelter. 

In statements to the press, the family blamed an “alliance between the school, the Swiss Child Protection Agency, and the Swiss hospital in Geneva” for influencing their daughter against their wishes. They also said the transgender charity Le Refuge pushed for the child’s gender transition.

“We were very clear with the school, that we did not believe it was up to the school to socially transition our daughter. We learned that the school psychologist was getting in and was feeding my daughter with materials, putting her in contact with Le Refuge,” the parents said.

Gender transition for underage teens is regulated in Switzerland by the Swiss Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes Society (SPED). Regulations allow for parental consent to be overridden following legal approval.

“I feel powerless,” “C”’s mother said, adding, “I love my child. She is only 16 years old. She cannot make such a decision. She needs a mother and her family.”

Speaking about the plight of the family, lead lawyer on the case, Dr. Felix Böllmann of ADF, said the couple was “living every parent’s worst nightmare.” He also warned of the wider implications if the practice of taking children who wish to transition against their parents’ wishes into care is normalised. Böllman said the actions of the Swiss authorities violate national and international law. 

Not only have these parents committed no wrong, they absolutely must have their child returned home and are under no obligation to consent to the authority’s demands to allow dangerous medical interventions.

The teen’s case has attracted international attention as part of a broader effort to affirm parental rights regarding gender transitions, two years after Swiss authorities liberalised the process for changing gender. 

Official statistics from the Swiss health service show that at least a dozen children have undergone gender reassignment surgery since 2018. The number of sex change operations multiplied by 1,100% over the past seven years.

More and more countries—including Finland, Sweden, France, and the UK—have reversed course and no longer endorse ‘gender transition’ treatment in light of the irreversible harm it causes.

---

BOMBSHELL: Secret Service Told To Stand Down In Butler, Pennsylvania, Says Trump Event Head

---

Over 27 percent of Austrian nationals are either first- or second-generation immigrants, a fresh government report shows.

The Austrian government’s integration report, published last week, shows that 27.2 percent of residents are of foreign origin: first-generation immigrants or born in Austria to foreign parents, up from 19.4 percent in 2013. Despite the rapid demographic changes, ministers from the center-right and Green coalition government are pushing for continued immigration.

In the report compiled by the Austrian authorities, Germans (232,700), Romanians (153,400) and Turks (124,100) top the ranking of the main immigrant population groups. The same report shows that 112,300 people applied for asylum in 2022 alone, driven by a surge in Afghan and Syrian migrants, the European Conservative news portal reports by way of V4NA.

“Austria is only growing thanks to immigration,” said Tobias Thomas, director general of the Austrian statistical office, in a report published this week. The Austrian population is expected to pass the 10 million mark by mid-century, despite a falling birth rate (1.48 children per woman).

Susanne Rabb, the center-right integration minister of the Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP), responded to the report, saying it is “proof” that more immigration is needed. 

However, the data tells a different story. While labor market needs are cited as an argument for more immigration, the report reveals that employment rates among some immigrant communities are significantly lower than the national average (74.1 percent).

Furthermore, AI advances over the coming years are expected to lead to mass unemployment and government intervention in order to prop up the labor market. A report from Goldman Sachs stated that up to 300 million full-time jobs are expected to be lost in Europe and the United States by 2030.

Only 44 percent of Syrian and Afghan men are active in the labor market, compared to 26.3 percent of women from the same background.

The report also shows that a large proportion of asylum seekers are illiterate, with 23 percent unable to read and write in their mother tongue.

The Austrian newspaper Exxpress also reports that government statistics show that 45 percent of suspected criminals are foreign nationals.

However, according to Integration Minister Rabb, “the Austrian asylum brake is working.” The aim of the refugee brake is to curb immigration so as not to overburden the asylum system.

Last year, Austria recorded a 41 percent drop in asylum applications, a European outlier. This is an improvement compared to previous years in which Austria was one of the largest recipients of asylum seekers during the post-2014 European migration crisis.

In recent months, the influx of migrants from the Balkans northwards has prompted Austrian authorities to try to restrict family reunification and — despite fierce opposition from Green politicians — to introduce DNA testing to establish whether alleged family links are genuine.

However, the right-wing Freedom Party of Austria (FPÖ) said that the DNA testing policy is mostly already in place and is ineffective. The party is thus calling for a complete ban on family chain migration.

At the European level, Austrian Chancellor Karl Nehammer (ÖVP) is trying to pioneer a version of the UK’s “Rwanda plan,” under which asylum seekers would have to stay in a third country until their claims are processed.

---

---

BOMBSHELL: Secret Service Told To Stand Down In Butler, Pennsylvania, Says Trump Event Head

---

A British mother spent her life savings to win a battle to protect her disabled son from the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, but the court’s decision avoided ruling on the “crux of this issue,” according to medical commentator John Campbell, Ph.D.

“How could it be that the state could override a mother [and] order to have her child vaccinated?” medical commentator John Campbell, Ph.D., asked on a recent episode of his YouTube show.

Campbell discussed the recent legal victory, reported in The Telegraph, of a British mother whose disabled 24-year-old son had a chromosomal abnormality that experts testified put him at greater risk for heart damage from the COVID-19 vaccine.

In 2021, the mother, who goes by the pseudonym “Sarah,” did not want her son “Tom” to get the COVID-19 vaccine given the risks posed to someone with his condition. Yet, doctors and social workers demanded he be vaccinated for the “greater good of society.”

After a three-year court battle, where Sarah spent her entire life savings of 25,000 pounds, plus an additional 65,000 pounds she raised through crowdfunding, she won the case to protect her son from vaccination.

Campbell said when Sarah described the saga as a “Kafkaesque nightmare,” she was right because, in Franz Kafka’s novels, isolated protagonists typically face “bizarre or surrealistic predicaments and incomprehensible socio-bureaucratic powers.”

When she resisted the state’s orders for her son, Sarah was threatened with jail, arrest, asset seizure and having her son removed from her home to be forcibly vaccinated.

In the eyes of the state, Sarah said:

“I went from being a loving mother and Tom’s sole carer to a near criminal. I’ve been made to feel like a liar, a bad person and a fanatic.

“I was wrongly accused of being an anti-vaxxer just for questioning whether this new gene therapy was right for my son in his complex conditions.

“To me it was the state that was fanatical about its policy by bringing its might to bear upon me — the power of the state versus Sarah.”

Tom, severely disabled, was cared for by his mother. However, he was 18 when the government decided to vaccinate the “most vulnerable,” so he was assigned an attorney to act in his “best interest” and who advocated for him to be jabbed.

Sarah fought the case for three years. First, a judge ruled Tom should be vaccinated — despite conceding the court was “ill-equipped” to say if the vaccines were safe — because taking the vaccine was “altruistic” and required of all citizens.

Campbell said the decision ignored the specific and personal risks to Tom. “I would have thought an alternative strategy for that judge would be to err on the side of caution … but what do I know?”

Campbell said people affected by trisomy conditions like Tom’s — which include Down Syndrome and Edwards Syndrome — should be informed that expert testimony during the trial suggested they could be at increased risk for heart problems from mRNA products.

An appellate judge ruled this month that it is “no longer” in Tom’s best interest, given the “changing landscape of the virus,” and “increasing immunity.”

Campbell said the court’s conclusion was problematic because it leaves open the possibility that, during the pandemic, it would have been right to vaccinate Tom. The ruling “doesn’t really address the crux of the issue,” he said.

“The uncomfortable issues of the state ordering a mother to do something she doesn’t want to do to her child to me is the fundamental issue,” he said.

Although the outcome in the case was good, it doesn’t get around the fact — laid out in The Hope Accord — that during the COVID-19 pandemic period, “fundamental and cherished principles of medical ethics were disregarded on the premise of an emergency.”

---

BOMBSHELL: Secret Service Told To Stand Down In Butler, Pennsylvania, Says Trump Event Head

---

Donald Trump attended Monday’s Republican National Convention alongside his newly-chosen running mate.

“The American Journal” is live every weekday from 8-11 am CST.

Watch:

MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN! #TRUMP2024 pic.twitter.com/yKhLQQDuOu

— Dan Scavino Jr.??? (@DanScavino) July 16, 2024

Follow The American Journal on Telegram:

---

Establishment propagandists lash out at network for taking them off air on one of the most important news days in history

MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” hosts Mika Brzezinski and her husband Joe Scarborough vented on-air about the network canceling their Monday broadcast in fear their coverage of the attempted Trump assassination might be disrespectful and damaging to the company.

Trump broke MSNBC. @JoeNBC says this morning, the day after his bosses didn’t allow him to go on air, that if @MSNBC bumps them from the air again they can find new hosts. pic.twitter.com/8d0Rkuev8X

— Clay Travis (@ClayTravis) July 16, 2024

According to CNN, an MSNBC source revealed the decision was directly due to network higher-ups fearing someone on the show “might make an inappropriate comment on live television that could be used to assail the program and network as a whole.”

Speaking to the audience on Tuesday, Joe explained his crew was told there would be one news feed “across all NBC News channels” all day Monday.

“That did not happen. We don’t know why that didn’t happen and our team wasn’t given a good answer as to why that didn’t happen, but it didn’t happen,” he said.

Scarborough continued, saying, “We were very surprised, we were very disappointed and if we had known there wasn’t going to be the one news feed across NBC News channels we obviously would have been here Monday morning.”

Joe later took a jab at NBC by again noting he really wanted to go live Monday and asking why there wasn’t one news feed as promised.

When Mika attempted to push through Joe’s nagging and continue with the program, he cut her off and warned the network, “Let me just say, the next time we’re told there’s going to be a news feed replacing us, we’ll be in our chairs and the news feed will be us, or they can get somebody else to host the show.”

As it becomes more clear Joe Biden is going to lose the election and President Trump is more popular than he’s ever been, the American political establishment is becoming increasingly divided and panicked.

---