WEF Scientists Are Now Making Cancer-Resistant Brains Out of Aborted Babies
A team of WEF scientists have announced that they have successfully created a lab-grown cancer-resistant brain made out of aborted baby parts. Scientists at the Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology in the WEF-controlled nation of […]
The post WEF Scientists Are Now Making Cancer-Resistant Brains Out of Aborted Babies appeared first on The People’s Voice.
mRNA Vaccine Creator Has Developed Full-Blown Facial Paralysis – Media Blackout
The co-creator of the first Pfizer mRNA COVID vaccine has developed full-blown facial paralysis, a side-effects of the vaccines, according to reports. Özlem Türeci, a Turkish-German physician, helped develop the first messenger RNA-based vaccine to […]
The post mRNA Vaccine Creator Has Developed Full-Blown Facial Paralysis – Media Blackout appeared first on The People’s Voice.
Farmers, Citizens Shout at German Food & Ag Minister During Protest
Dissatisfied citizens and farmers shouted at Green Party member and eco-politician Cem Özdemir, the German minister of Food and Agriculture, during a protest on Tuesday night.
?? BREAKING | We’re live in Erlenbach where Cem Özdemir, the German Minister of Food and Agriculture just got greeted by a fed up crowd of farmers and citizens telling him to “piss off!”.
A dozen children on plastic tractors were shouting: “For the farmers!’’ #Bauernproteste pic.twitter.com/nRKU63xscJ— Eva Vlaardingerbroek (@EvaVlaar) January 9, 2024
Özdemir, who is accused of prioritizing the World Economic Forum’s agenda over the interests of the citizens of Germany, is not new to radical politics. He once compared the debate on Autobahn speed limits in Germany to the debate on firearms in the United States of America.
German farmers are protesting in Berlin after Socialist Democratic Party Chancellor Olaf Scholz’s government planned on cutting agricultural diesel subsidies for farmers.
A farmer from Bavaria, Ralf Huber, told Reuters, “For a farm like mine, I would lose about 10,000 euros…. For our businesses, it’s a catastrophe.”
Eva Vlaardingerbroek posted a video on X stating, “The German farmers have successfully blocked dozens of highways with the help of the German truckers. This is my view up on a tractor on the A2 — Europe’s busiest highway. I’m blown away. History in the making.”
Farmers are using their tractors to block the avenue that leads to the Brandenburg Gate in the capitol city Berlin, as well as roads and highways throughout Germany, during their “week of action.” The protesters have allowed emergency services to pass through their blockade, and have been peacefully protesting against the tax increases.
The mainstream media has falsely accused the protests of being co-opted by “far right extremists”, saying, “Critics are therefore warning that for the first time since 1945 and the end of the Nazi dictatorship under Adolf Hitler, a right-wing extremist could once again hold a government office in Germany.” Host of Redacted Clayton Morris spoke with farmers in Germany, and reports that those protesting have stated those accusations are completely false, and their motivation for protesting is rising taxes, fuel costs, and inability to run their businesses.
‘I Don’t Recall’: Fauci Unable to Answer Key Questions in Pandemic Probe
On the first day of a two-day closed-door interview before the U.S. House of Representatives Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic Monday, Dr. Anthony Fauci, former director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID), frequently evaded questions about gain-of-function research and the government’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Chairman Brad Wenstrup (R-Ohio), in a statement following Monday’s interview, said, “Dr. Fauci’s testimony today uncovered drastic and systemic failures in America’s public health systems” and that Fauci “had no idea what was happening under his own jurisdiction at NIAID.”
According to The Hill, Fauci offered “his expertise on preparing for potential outbreaks in the future.” But according to The Washington Times, he “couldn’t remember many details about his advocacy of lockdowns, his flip-flopping on mask mandates and his decision to allow government funding of gain-of-function research in China that might have led to the pandemic.”
Fauci “claimed he ‘did not recall’ pertinent COVID-19 information or conversations more than 100 times,” and “profusely defended his previous congressional testimony where he stated the National Institutes of Health (NIH) did not fund gain-of-function research in Wuhan,” according to the subcommittee statement.
Fauci also “repeatedly played semantics with the definition of gain-of-function in an attempt to avoid conceding that NIH funded potentially dangerous research in China,” the subcommittee stated.
Responding to Monday’s testimony, Rutgers University molecular biologist Richard Ebright, Ph.D., a frequent critic of gain-of-function research, told The Defender:
“Fauci repeatedly and flagrantly violated U.S. government policies implemented to protect the public from lab-generated pandemics. He lied — brazenly — to Congress about his policy violations in three Senate hearings in 2021-2022. He lied — brazenly — to Congress about his policy violations again yesterday.”
Investigative journalist Paul D. Thacker, who has documented attempts by Fauci and other government officials, federal agencies and leading scientists to cover up the U.S. government’s role in funding gain-of-function research in China, told The Defender he was not surprised by Fauci’s stance.
“As I documented over two years ago, Anthony Fauci has lied about funding gain-of-function research in Wuhan. That’s fine. People in Washington lie all the time,” Thacker said.
“But when he lied during a congressional hearing, wagging his finger at Senator [Rand] Paul … I knew immediately he had broken the law. His lies about this pandemic have been documented in multiple media outlets and I hope he is eventually prosecuted,” he added.
Francis Boyle, J.D., Ph.D., professor of international law at the University of Illinois and a bioweapons expert who drafted the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989, told The Defender Fauci should be prosecuted.
“Fauci knew exactly what was going on at the Wuhan BSL4 [biosafety level 4] and the University of North Carolina BSL3 — he was paying for it,” Boyle said. “He has repeatedly perjured himself in testimony before Congress. This is just more of the same.”
Boyle said Wenstrup should follow Sen. Rand Paul’s (R-Ky.) example and refer Fauci to the U.S. Department of Justice for prosecution for perjury. “Maybe we will get some action there now that the Wuhan cover-up is unfolding, as detailed in Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s book, ‘The Wuhan Cover-Up,’” he added.
The seven-hour meeting was Fauci’s first appearance in the House since retiring from public office in December 2022. He was accompanied by two of his attorneys and two government attorneys, according to The Hill.
The closed-door testimony was first announced by Wenstrup on Nov. 30, 2023. In the same announcement, Wenstrup revealed that Fauci will sit before the subcommittee as part of a public hearing later in 2024. That meeting has not yet been scheduled.
In his statement about Moday’s interview, Wenstrup said it was “concerning that the face of our nation’s response to the world’s worst public health crisis ‘does not recall’ key details about COVID-19 origins and pandemic-era policies. Nearly 1.2 million Americans lost their lives to a potentially preventable pandemic,” he added.
Fauci ‘repeatedly and fragrantly violated’ gain-of-function research definitions
According to The Washington Times, lawmakers prepared 200 pages of questions for Fauci. In remarks quoted by The New York Post, Wenstrup said Fauci’s testimony “will shed light on topics that no Committee member, nor news outlet has ever inquired about before.”
Fauci took several breaks during the interview, but the meeting had a “respectful” and “cooperative” tone. Fauci did not take questions from reporters.
Yet, despite the reported tone, Fauci was evasive on key issues, such as gain-of-function research.
Regarding Fauci’s apparently poor recall, Wenstrup said, “That just means that maybe we have to find the people that do recall.”
In a Jan. 4 op-ed published in The New York Post, James Bovard, author of “Last Rights: The Death of American Liberty,” wrote that “The subcommittee announced Fauci’s ‘honesty is non-negotiable.’”
“But will his memory stage another boycott?” Bovard asked, noting that when Fauci was deposed in 2022 for the Missouri v. Biden lawsuit on government censorship of COVID-19 counternarratives, he answered “I don’t recall” 174 times, “including about damning and quite memorable emails he sent.”
Much of this evasiveness appears to have come in response to questions about gain-of-function research.
Wenstrup remarked on Fauci’s “new … operational definition” of gain-of-function. “I don’t know that every scientist that deals with this type of viral research understands his definition.”
According to Ebright:
“Fauci’s attempt to deny he violated U.S. government policies by claiming he uses different definitions of ‘gain-of-function research’ and enhanced potential pandemic pathogen research is equivalent — exactly equivalent — to a terrorist attempting to deny he violated federal laws by claiming he uses different definitions of ‘terrorism.’
“Fauci was not empowered to replace definitions in U.S. government policies with his own personal definitions.”
Ebright told The Defender the only definitions of “gain-of-function research” and “enhanced potential pandemic pathogen research” that matter are the definitions in the U.S. government policies in effect in 2014-2017 and from 2018 to the present.
Based on those definitions, Ebright said Fauci “repeatedly and fragrantly violated” the guidelines for both types of research.
According to Newsweek, “Fauci has previously denied in testimony to Congress that the National Institutes of Health, of which he was a member between 1984 and 2022, had funded risky ‘gain-of-function’ research.”
A Jan. 6 report by U.S. Right to Know said that “scientists at the center of the ‘lab leak’ controversy” visited Fauci’s NIAID in 2017 to discuss their research — “just months before NIH lifted a pause on high-risk virology, and two years before a novel coronavirus emerged near their lab in Wuhan.”
Rep. Kathy Castor (D-Fla.) defended Fauci after Monday’s interview:
“A lot of our GOP colleagues have failed to recognize the operative, regulatory definition [of] gain-of-function that was instituted in 2017 was operative at the time the COVID pandemic came along. And the concern over EcoHealth Alliance … Dr. Fauci was able to clarify that today.”
Wenstrup said the subcommittee planned to question Fauci further regarding gain-of-function research today.
Fauci unable to confirm NIAID had any oversight of U.S.-funded foreign labs
Monday’s interview also addressed government grants for gain-of-function research and foreign laboratories, such as the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan, China.
According to the subcommittee, Fauci “testified that he signed off on every foreign and domestic NIAID grant without reviewing the proposals” but “was unable to confirm if NIAID has ANY mechanisms to conduct oversight of the foreign laboratories they fund.”
“A 2020 email, previously released by the Select Subcommittee, proved Dr. Fauci was aware of dangerous gain-of-function research occurring in Wuhan, China. Today, he backtracked by arguing he should not have stated that as ‘fact,’” the subcommittee added.
?BREAKING?
— Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic (@COVIDSelect) July 13, 2023
New emails reveal that Dr. Fauci was aware of risky gain-of-function research occurring in Wuhan, China prior to the emergence of COVID-19.
Why didn’t he tell the American people?@COVIDSelect is demanding answers? pic.twitter.com/pvxtaCRB5s
In its Nov. 30, 2023 statement, the subcommittee said it had previously “revealed evidence that Dr. Fauci prompted the drafting of the now infamous ‘Proximal Origin’ publication to disprove the lab-leak theory. Fauci then cited the paper from the White House podium without disclosing his involvement in prompting the publication.
“Further, the Select Subcommittee revealed that Dr. Fauci was aware of dangerous gain-of-function research occurring in Wuhan, China prior to the emergence of COVID-19, but remained curiously silent to the public,” the statement read.
Following Monday’s interview, Wenstrup said that Fauci’s responses indicated there were “some tremendous flaws in our system” concerning issuing grants.
“Dr. Fauci signed off on all domestic and foreign research grants without reviewing the proposals and admitted that he was unaware if NIAID conducted oversight of the laboratories they fund,” Wenstrup said in the subcommittee statement.
“Clearly, the American people and the United States government are operating with completely different expectations about the responsibilities of our public health leaders and the accountability of our public health agencies,” he added.
But Rep. Debbie Dingell (D-Mich.) defended Fauci’s responses on this issue, saying “I think it’s probably pretty political that we’re here to begin with. But I think they’re asking questions and he is being very specific in answering.”
She added that the closed-door nature of the interview afforded Fauci the opportunity to “clarify a lot of political points people have tried to make,” without “playing to the cameras.”
Fauci’s testimony was scheduled to continue today, with further questions about the “Proximal Origin” paper and COVID-19 countermeasures.
“I look forward to asking Dr. Fauci further questions about mandates, his role in prompting the ‘Proximal Origin’ publication, and his policy positions related to masks and lockdowns,” Wenstrup said in Monday’s statement.
“Tomorrow’s testimony will continue the Select Subcommittee’s effort to deliver the answers Americans demand and deserve.”
World May Soon Face Lost Decade of Low Economic Growth
Chief Economist Indermit Gill noted several challenges to global economic growth, but the Washington, DC-based financial institution is often seen as a tool of Western interests.
The end of 2024 is likely to conclude the slowest half-decade of economic growth in 30 years, according to new analysis from the World Bank.
The report, entitled “Global Economic Prospects,” was released online by the Western financial institution Tuesday. A number of continued economic headwinds were identified by World Bank Group Senior Vice President Indermit Gill, including “tight monetary policies, restrictive credit conditions, and anemic global trade and investment.”
The report also spotlighted the recent conflicts in Gaza and Ukraine – coercive Western sanctions on Russia have increased energy prices worldwide.
“Global cooperation is critical to address the issues of high debt, climate change, trade fragmentation, and food insecurity and conflict,” read an overview on the World Bank’s website. “Across emerging market and developing economies (EMDEs), limited fiscal space highlights the need to improve spending efficiency. Decisive policy action is also needed to encourage a sustained acceleration in investment.”
World economic growth is expected to slow for the third year in a row according to the report, down to 2.4% from 2.3% in 2023. This comes after a steep decline amidst the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, which was followed by a partial recovery in 2021.
But the damage wrought by the global pandemic remains, according to the analysis. About a quarter of people in developing countries and 40% of people in low-income countries will remain poorer in 2024 than they were before the emergence of COVID-19.
The World Bank predicted developing economies would face the greatest challenges. Latin America and the Caribbean would perform slightly better than average, with the most significant growth to come from the Middle East and Africa. North America, Europe, Central Asia, and the Asia-Pacific would see the greatest declines in growth according to the financial institution.
“Near-term growth will remain weak, leaving many developing countries – especially the poorest – stuck in a trap: with paralyzing levels of debt and tenuous access to food for nearly one out of every three people,” said Gill, who studied at the University of Chicago, a school famous for its advocacy of neoliberal economic policy around the globe.
The World Bank has often been criticized for exactly that kind of free market evangelism. Observers suggest the institution’s advocacy of austerity and privatization actually prioritizes economic opportunity for transnational capital over genuine foreign development.
The International Monetary Fund (IMF), the World Bank’s sister institution, is often accused of predatory behavior in saddling developing countries with large amounts of debt, necessitating further privatization.
Gill suggests he’s very much a champion of neoliberal economics in his forward to the World Bank’s report, which praises “consolidation of government finances” and “a better investment climate for private enterprise.”
Every president of the World Bank since its creation in the 1940s has been an American citizen while its managing director has always been European (usually French or German). Critics say the institution’s leadership symbolizes its Western neocolonial role.
A few years back, the World Bank was forced to recognize strong poverty reduction and economic growth in Bolivia, where socialist President Evo Morales succeeded by defying the kind of policy generally imposed by the IMF and World Bank. Bolivia has been recognized for presiding over the lowest inflation in the region and some of the lowest in the world with strongly interventionary government policy.
Over the last decades, socialist China has played the largest role in global poverty reduction, pulling some 800 million people out of poverty.
The NWO’s 2024 Black Swan Tell
Hostage Crisis at Ecuador’s TV Station Ends
The hostage crisis at a TV station in Ecuador’s largest city, Guayaquil, has ended with all assailants detained and captives rescued, national police chief Cesar Augusto Zapata Correa announced on Tuesday evening.
Masked gunmen invaded the headquarters of TC Television earlier that day, interrupting a live broadcast and taking journalists and other employees captive. The assault took place amid the national emergency declared by President Daniel Noboa in response to prison riots and attacks by gang members that swept the country on Tuesday.
Heavily armed security forces quickly arrived at the scene and entered the TV station building, detaining 13 assailants and recovering “weapons, explosives and other evidence,” Zapata Correa said. He added that all hostages were freed. He did not report any casualties.
El operativo policial en @tctelevision dejó 13 aprehendidos, armas, explosivos y otros indicios.
— GraD. César Augusto Zapata Correa (@CmdtPoliciaEc) January 9, 2024
Se liberaron a los rehenes y se puso a buen recaudo a los trabajadores.
Los causantes serán puestos ante la justicia para que sean sancionados por los actos terroristas. pic.twitter.com/9KEXWvDfzZ
“The perpetrators will be brought to justice in order to be punished for their terrorist acts,” the police chief wrote on X (formerly Twitter), vowing that law enforcement “will not allow violent actions to threaten order and peace.”
A video posted to social media shows police escorting detainees out of the building.
???#BREAKING: Footage of police escorting arrested cartel members out of the Ecuadorian Television studio. https://t.co/4LHe4d9s3O pic.twitter.com/7to25mVIus
— Censored Men (@CensoredMen) January 9, 2024
The freed employees were filmed hugging their loved ones and praying outside the TV headquarters.
??? Video of some of the freed hostages meeting their loved ones ♥️ pic.twitter.com/vJZDrU16be
— Censored Men (@CensoredMen) January 9, 2024
At least eight people were killed and two were injured in Guayaquil on Tuesday, Mayor Aquiles Alvarez said at a press conference. President Noboa earlier authorized the military to neutralize criminal gangs he described as “terrorist organizations and belligerent non-state actors.”
BREAKING: UN Planning New Pandemic To Establish Planetary Dictatorship