News

Demented Biden Threatens Gun Owners at Anti-2A Event: ‘They Need F-16s to Take on Government’

Demented Biden Threatens Gun Owners at Anti-2A Event: ‘They Need F-16s to Take on Government’

adminJun 11, 20243 min read

Demented Biden Threatens Gun Owners at Anti-2A Event: ‘They Need F-16s to Take on Government’

Puppet president essentially makes case for why many Americans argue they need firearms in the first place.

Joe Biden once again taunted American gun owners they’d be wiped out by “F-15s” in a theoretical revolt against government oppression, essentially making the case for why many Americans argue they need firearms in the first place.

Biden slurred the remarks during a Moms Demand Action event in Atlanta, Georgia, where he called for a ban on “assault-style weapons.”

“And by the way if they want to think it’s to take on government if we get out of line, which they’re talking again about, well, guess what, they need F-15s, they don’t need rifles,” the puppet president commented.

Do you think Biden would spin this into launching “F-16s” to take out Conservatives in the U.S. ?

Civil War? Or is that too far? pic.twitter.com/bONY1snzl5

— The Patriot Oasis™ (@ThePatriotOasis) June 11, 2024

At the same time, the Biden administration is working to federally seize F-15s and F-16s under the control of state National Guard units – but, never mind that.

REMINDER: I don’t think it is a coincidence that Biden is working to remove all F-15 and F-16 fighters from state national guard units under the control of state governors at the same time he’s reminding Americans they’d need an F-15 to stop him… pic.twitter.com/zkJiXCOLTp

— @amuse (@amuse) June 11, 2024

Biden also made a weird comment about having “attended too many mass shootings,” highlighting the Democrat presidential nominee’s fading mental faculties.

Biden: “I’ve attended too many mass shootings”

???
pic.twitter.com/GxeVN5C9Pn

— Royce Chamberlin (@RoyceChamberlin) June 11, 2024

Elsewhere during the event, Biden lied that he was a constitutional law professor, that cannons were unlawful to own during the Civil War, and severely botched President Thomas Jefferson’s famous “tree of liberty” quote, incorrectly referencing the “blood of liberty.”

Joe Biden in less than a minute:

– Claims he was a professor at UPenn, which he never was
– Claims he taught a constitutional law class on the second amendment, which he never did
– Says that you couldn’t own a cannon when 2A was implemented, which you could
– And ends by… pic.twitter.com/64nA2qwmW0

— Greg Price (@greg_price11) June 11, 2024

For what it’s worth, the actual quote is:

“The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.”

Biden was also dubbed a hyprocrite on social media for urging gun reforms while his own son Hunter was convicted on three felony gun charges the same day.

“Joe Biden is literally speaking at an @Everytown gun control event today while his son was just found GUILTY for lying on his 4473— one of the very laws Everytown claims to support. Any comment, @Everytown?” asked conservative commentator Dana Loesch.

Joe Biden is literally speaking at an @Everytown gun control event today while his son was just found GUILTY for lying on his 4473— one of the very laws Everytown claims to support.
Any comment, @Everytown ?https://t.co/Ml7tvPLYjI

— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) June 11, 2024

The anti-gun event followed another disastrous appearance by Biden at a Juneteenth celebration held at the White House just one night earlier.

Who is suhlongasuhijeruhhnied?

pic.twitter.com/MyCDUNLXUq

— ALX ?? (@alx) June 11, 2024


Update: Middle Schooler Censored By School Over Patriotic Speech Now BANNED From Attending Next Year

Update: Middle Schooler Censored By School Over Patriotic Speech Now BANNED From Attending Next Year

adminJun 11, 20244 min read

Update: Middle Schooler Censored By School Over Patriotic Speech Now BANNED From Attending Next Year

“After careful consideration and thorough review of recent events, and with the support of the Diocese, the decision has been made to terminate your family’s enrollment from St. Bonaventure School for next school year.”

A California seventh grade student who went viral last month after his principal censored his patriotic speech has now been banned from attending the school next year.

Jimmy Heyward was told by Saint Bonaventure Catholic School Principal Mary Flock to edit his campaign speech for the role of Commissioner of School Spirit and Patriotism, reportedly telling him to remove “ALL parts about patriotism.”

To add insult to injury, his mother reportedly claimed the principal sent “an email to all parents at SBS informing them of the incident but completely lying about what truly happened earlier in the day.”

Now, SBS has informed Heyward’s family that he won’t be allowed to attend the school next year.

UPDATE: Jimmy, the middle schooler who wasn’t allowed to give his speech at school because it was too patriotic, was just notified that he and his sisters will not be allowed back to this school next year. https://t.co/MVKmbnXyc6 pic.twitter.com/V9KkaCri2T

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) June 11, 2024

The letter shared online by Libs of TikTok reads:

Dear Mr. and Mrs. Heyward,

This letter is to inform you of a decision regarding your family’s association with St. Bonaventure School. After careful consideration and thorough review of recent events, and with the support of the Diocese, the decision has been made to terminate your family’s enrollment from St. Bonaventure School for next school year.

The decision comes as a result of serious violations of the Christian Code of Conduct and the Parent Electronic Communications Policy, as outlined in our Parent Student Handbook and included below. These policies are in place to ensure a safe, respectful, and supportive environment for all members of our school community, and adherence to them is crucial for the welfare and integrity of our educational environment.

Jimmy’s speech primarily dealt with steps he’d take to cultivate school spirit among students; but, he made the mistake of professing his love for America and wanting his peers to understand and embrace the meaning of the Pledge of Allegiance.

Following the viral response to Jimmy’s video, Saint Bonaventure Catholic School Principal Mary Flock reportedly deleted her X account.

This is Jimmy. A middle schooler in California. He ran for “Commissioner of School Spirit & Patriotism” at school.

His principal allegedly made him change his speech and remove all mention of patriotism. When he refused, she reportedly didn’t allow him to give the speech and he… pic.twitter.com/25IaDjP5Zw

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) May 21, 2024

Here’s the part of Jimmy’s speech his principal likely found problematic:

“My love for America is my motivation for running for Commissioner of Patriotism in School Spirit.

“It is an honor to live in this country. Sadly, some people take their citizenship for granted, whether it is disrespecting the people who protect us, or eating nachos during the National Anthem at a sporting event.

“Many people recite the Pledge of Allegiance without understanding its meaning. If someone doesn’t truly know what they are pledging to the United States of America, they might as well be reciting the lyrics to ‘Shake It Off’ by Taylor Swift.

“I want to fix this so everyone understands the meaning of the Pledge of Allegiance. As the commissioner of patriotism, I would have the crucial task of creating ways to bring more patriotism to SBS. I love my country and I love Saint Bonaventure, but I want to strengthen our patriotism in school spirit.

“So, accordingly, I Jimmy Hayward am running for Commissioner Patriotism in School Spirit. I want to clarify that my ideas are not promises, but I can promise to make pep rallies great again. I will make the school spirit great again. I will make patriotism within SBS great again, and mostly I will make SBS great again. Thank you and God bless Saint Bonaventure Catholic School.”


Follow Jamie White on X | Truth | Gab | Gettr | Minds

Successively Worse Bioweapons will Sucker Public into Vaccines

Successively Worse Bioweapons will Sucker Public into Vaccines

adminJun 11, 20241 min read

Successively Worse Bioweapons will Sucker Public into Vaccines

A decade before the program became operational with Covid, Alex Jones warned the public about controlled bioweapons releases and their complementary ‘vaccines’.

In 2009 Alex Jones predicted that while the ‘new 9/11’ may have a nuclear element to it, the real depopulation endgame will consist of successively more virulent biological weapons releases to lock society down tighter each time, corral the public into quarantine camps and inoculate them with slow-kill vaccines.

Don’t miss:

Avian Influenza Added to Flu Vaccine in 2009


The Five Stages Of Denial When Skeptics Are Faced With Economic Collapse

The Five Stages Of Denial When Skeptics Are Faced With Economic Collapse

adminJun 11, 20249 min read

The Five Stages Of Denial When Skeptics Are Faced With Economic Collapse

Economic collapse is NOT an event, it’s a process.

In light of the recent resurgence of inflation on top of increasingly rigged employments stats, declining manufacturing and stagnant wages I think it’s important to revisit a fundamental question: What does an economic collapse look like?

As I have said for years an economic collapse is NOT an event, it’s a process. When people think of a historic crisis they usually imagine something like the stock market crash of 1929 at the beginning of the Great Depression. However, there were numerous indicators and warning signs leading up to that crash that should have tipped people off. There were even a handful of economists that voiced concerns about impending instability, yet they were ignored.

Then, after the crash occurred numerous establishment economists denied that the system was in any real danger. They continually claimed that recovery was “right around the corner”, but the recovery never materialized. Instead, the crash spiraled onward for over a decade until world war erupted, largely because the Federal Reserve raised interest rates into economic weakness (a disaster they have openly admitted to causing and a policy they are instituting right now).

The point is, the mainstream “experts” are almost always wrong. The skeptics of collapse either ignore the evidence or they don’t comprehend the implications of events. They don’t want to believe that the economy is broken and that consequences are possible. They operate from the limited view of their own personal experience. For most of their lives the system has functioned without catastrophe so that must mean catastrophe is impossible. In truth, catastrophe has merely been deferred to a later date, not prevented.

Our present day predicament has not reached Great Depression levels yet. We are currently in a stagflationary phase similar to what happened in the 1970s. For those that think we have it bad now, the 70s were actually far worse.

House prices nearly TRIPLED from 1970 to 1980 (the median house price was $17,000 in 1970 compared to almost $50,000 in 1980). Annual inflation on most goods and services was in the double digits and the minimum wage was only $1.45 an hour. Unemployment was high and interest rates were eventually hiked to around 20% by 1981.

The point is that these breakdowns in financial structures happen slowly, and then all at once. Much like the build up of an avalanche. For those that know history the signs are easy to see. For those that don’t, they’ll assume that all is well even when the house is burning down around them.

Another factor that makes people oblivious to the danger is the moving of goalposts; they get used to poor economic conditions and the decline is entrenched as the “new normal.”  For example, in 2015 the average house rental was $1100.  Less than ten years later the average cost is $2150; that’s double the financial burden.  But today this price is considered par for the course.

Nothing gets better, the situation only ever gets worse, but since it happens over a period of many years (the process of collapse) the public largely accepts it and will even accuse those of us sounding the alarm of “doom mongering.”

As with any collapse there eventually comes a point of popular intolerance – That moment where people finally realize that the “doom mongers” were right all along and that the weight of the implosion is too much to refute. I believe we’re approaching that moment very quickly. In the meantime. Here are the five stages of denial that people go through before they admit that a fiscal calamity is upon them…

Stage 1: “I Don’t Know What The Conspiracy Theorists Are Talking About – I’m Doing Fine”

There’s an old saying from the Great Depression that goes something like this: “It’s only a depression for the people without jobs.”

If you weren’t a part of the 30% unemployed in the US at that time, then in your narrow world the Great Depression might not have seemed all that bad. In other words, people will ignore the sinking of the Titanic as long as they still have their own lifeboat.

I will say that this is a major problem in the midst of the stagflation crisis today, and it’s the root of what many Zennials are complaining about. In their minds, this is the worst economy in history of the world and they blame “boomers” for their pain. It’s really not (at least not yet), but it’s true that many “boomers” are going into the crisis with the advantage of time. They have had the time to build a lifeboat while Zennials have not.

It’s not about what’s fair, there’s no such thing as “fair” in economics. But older Americans need to realize that even if stagflation is not a crisis for them personally, it is indeed a crisis for younger people in particular. Any person still denying the reality of the collapse because “they’re doing fine” needs to shut up and take stock of the bigger picture.

Stage 2: “They’ve Been Talking About Collapse For Years And We’re Still Here”

A lot of people out there have childish notions of what a collapse is, mostly derived from Hollywood films and television. They imagine stock market mayhem, endless soup lines, mass starvation and even Mad Max-style destruction. When these kinds of things do happen it’s always at the END of the collapse process, not at the beginning. The former nation of Yugoslavia suffered through multiple inflation events before it finally exploded with balkanization and war. It didn’t happen overnight, but all the signs were there.

When analysts predict these events years ahead of time they are doing you a favor; they are giving you ample time to prepare. Unlike the banking elites and their proxies who only warn the public right before (or right after) the crisis hits a peak.

Believe it or not I still see deniers arguing that all is well today, even after massive stagflation, attempted nationwide medical tyranny, multiple regional wars around the globe that could trigger WWIII, constant civil unrest, etc. Is the threat of imminent death the only thing that will wake these people up to reality?

Stage 3: “Maybe Things Are Bad Now But The Crisis Is Transitory, It Will Be Over Soon”

This is the stage in which deniers finally accept that there is indeed some instability, but they cope with the issue by claiming the storm will quickly pass and there’s nothing to worry about. The thing is, they spent so much time trying to debunk the economists that were warning them they now fear being proven wrong more than they fear the crisis ahead. It’s a kind of mental sickness common to our culture – The absolute refusal of a large percentage of Americans to admit being wrong and moving on.

It’s okay to be wrong sometimes. It’s not okay to be in denial about it.

The claim that a collapse is “transitory” is a way for skeptics overwhelmed by facts and evidence to continue dismissing reality. If the economic decline doesn’t last very long then they never have to concede defeat to the “conspiracy theorists.”

Stage 4: “No One Saw The Crisis Coming”

I saw this argument thousands of times during the pandemic lockdowns and the initial inflation spike. There were so many people raging about the circumstances and a lot of them were the types of people that used to deny that anything out of the ordinary was going on. They started looking for scapegoats and they came up with the idea that there was no early warning.

If only someone had given them some kind of hint of what was about to happen, they would have prepared better, right?

The media and government officials tend to play into this stage of denial aggressively. In other words, this is the moment they assert that “No one saw this coming.” The event struck like lightning out of the blue. No one could have foreseen this outcome and there’s nothing anyone could have done about it.

Whenever I hear these arguments I’m reminded of the movie trend in the early 2000s of global disaster flicks. There’s always those scenes where the asteroid or the ocean wave or the tornado hits and we see thousands of people scurrying like ants, only to be crushed by a godlike force that they had no power to defend against. I never liked those movies, but I recognize that they play into a hidden element of fatalism in the human mind.

There is a strange mechanism in some people’s thinking that wants to believe they have no power to change their circumstances. They feel better assuming that the tides of fate are beyond their control and that there’s nothing they could have done differently. In reality, all they had to do was listen and think critically and they could have prepared accordingly. Their pain is the result of their own ignorance and ego.

Stage 5: “Everyone Saw The Crisis Coming”

Ah yes, the final stage of denial. This one is my favorite. It is the inevitable moment when skeptics fully concede that the economic collapse is a fact of life and then they claim they “saw it coming all along.” The inability for these people to admit they were wrong debases their ability to make informed decisions about the future.

They know a crisis is upon them and they’ll now pretend as if they knew it was going to happen. Therefore, all the “conspiracy theorists” that tried to warn them are not special or better informed than they are.

Of course, you’ll never see any evidence of these skeptics (and many mainstream economists) actually predicting anything.  You will see them predicting the opposite and attacking anyone that suggest they might be wrong.  One wonders why it’s so important for them to avoid giving credit where credit is due and learning from their mistakes, but when a person’s identity is so wrapped up in being the “expert,” the idea of completely fumbling the ball on the biggest economic disaster of their lifetime is too much to bear.


POWERFUL — MUST WATCH: The Globalist System Is Collapsing In Real Time, Warns Bilderberg Expert Daniel Estulin
Biden Admin Lifts Weapons Ban On Ukrainian Military’s Nazi Azov Battalion

Biden Admin Lifts Weapons Ban On Ukrainian Military’s Nazi Azov Battalion

adminJun 11, 20243 min read

Biden Admin Lifts Weapons Ban On Ukrainian Military’s Nazi Azov Battalion

Establishment went from claiming Ukraine has no Nazi problem to openly funding them!

The Biden administration’s State Department said on Tuesday it will be lifting a ban on providing U.S. weapons and training to the neo-Nazi Azov battalion of the Ukrainian military.

“The U.S. had banned the regiment from using American weapons, citing the neo-Nazi ideology of some of its founders,” reports ABC News.

Since the beginning of the Russia-Ukraine conflict in 2022, Russian authorities have decried the “Nazification” of their neighboring nation.

Western media has cried Ukraine cannot have a Nazi problem because its NATO-controlled puppet President Volodymyr Zelensky is Jewish.

Infowars and other alternative media outlets have extensively covered the neo-Nazi military brigade, from their numerous war crimes to their pagan “blood and soil” rituals.

Ending the ban on U.S. training and funding the group, the State Department claimed it found “no evidence” of human rights violations by Azov.

In March 2022, deceased Ukrainians in the Donetsk People’s Republic were found with swastikas carved into their skin, with the Russian Defense Ministry claiming the Azov brigade tortured them to death.

Locals interviewed by journalists have repeatedly claimed the Azov unit “only shoot civilians.”

Just this week, a U.S. State Department-connected group published an online list of Americans criticizing Ukraine, accusing them of pushing “Kremlin propaganda” and blaming them for recent setbacks in the ongoing fight with Russia.

Infowars, Alex Jones, other prominent journalists and even GOP politicians were listed as “enemies” by the website, which writes of Infowars, “The articles on the site describe how Russian war crimes were staged, including the massacre of civilians in Bucha, Kyiv region, in February-March 2022; how American biolabs were deployed in Ukraine, and the activities of ‘Nazis’ including the ‘Nazi Azov’ regiment.”

The timing of the “enemies list” release just happened to align with the State Department’s decision to continue funding the Nazi military unit.

Check out some of the video reports below exposing Ukraine’s Nazi infestation as well as how the entire New World Order establishment has bizarrely defended the group.


A Court Victory Over Vaccine Mandates

A Court Victory Over Vaccine Mandates

adminJun 11, 20245 min read

A Court Victory Over Vaccine Mandates

The Ninth Circuit ruling today demonstrates that the court saw through Los Angeles Unified School District’s monkey business, and in so doing, it made clear that American’s cherished rights to self-determination, including the sacred right of bodily autonomy in matters of health, are not negotiable.

Health Freedom Defense Fund (HFDF), California Educators for Medical Freedom, and individual plaintiffs have won their appeal in the Ninth Circuit on LAUSD’s Employee Covid Vaccination Mandate.

Health Freedom Defense Fund et. al, led by the exceptional legal team of John Howard and Scott Street at JW Howard Attorneys, has won a significant victory in the Ninth Circuit, which reversed the dismissal of their lawsuit challenging the Los Angeles Unified School District’s (“LAUSD”) mandatory vaccination policy for all employees.

Reversing the decision of the Central District of California in Los Angeles, the Ninth Circuit majority held that, first, the case was not mooted by LAUSD’s rescission of the mandate after an oral argument last September, 2023. The majority called out LAUSD’s gamesmanship for what it was – a bald-faced attempt at avoiding an adverse ruling by trying to create an issue of mootness.

Unfortunately for LAUSD, they had already done this once in the trial court. Applying the voluntary cessation doctrine, the majority doubted LAUSD’s sincerity in rescinding the mandate immediately after an unfavorable oral argument in September of last year.

On the merits, the majority ruled that the district court had misapplied the Supreme Court’s 1905 decision in Jacobson v. Massachusetts when it dismissed LAUSD’s lawsuit on grounds that the mandate was rationally related to a legitimate state interest. In Jacobson, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of a smallpox vaccination mandate because it related to “preventing the spread” of smallpox.

The majority, however, noted that HFDF had alleged in the lawsuit that the Covid jabs are not “traditional” vaccines because they do not prevent the spread of Covid-19 but only purport to mitigate Covid symptoms in the recipient. This, HFDF had alleged in its complaint, makes the Covid jab a medical treatment, not a vaccine.

The court recognized that mitigating symptoms rather than preventing the spread of disease “distinguishes Jacobson, thus presenting a different government interest.” Based on this reasoning, the majority disapproved the trial court’s contention that, even if the jabs do not prevent the spread, “Jacobson still dictates that the vaccine mandate is subject to, and survives, the rational basis test.”

The court held that “[t]his misapplies Jacobson,” which “did not involve a claim in which the compelled vaccine was ‘designed to reduce symptoms in the infected vaccine recipient rather than to prevent transmission and infection.”’ Jacobson does not, the majority concluded, extend to “forced medical treatment” for the benefit of the recipient.

The court declined to give any deference to pronouncements by the CDC that the “Covid-19 vaccines are safe and effective.” As the court asked rhetorically, “safe and effective” for what? The majority pointed to HFDF’s allegation that the CDC had changed the definition of “vaccine” in September 2021, striking the word “immunity” from that definition. The court also noted HFDF’s citations to CDC statements that the vaccines do not prevent transmission, and that natural immunity is superior to the vaccines.

In a separate concurrence, Judge Collins wrote that the district court “further erred by failing to realize that [HFDF’s] allegations directly implicate a distinct and more recent line of Supreme Court authority” for the proposition that “a competent person has a constitutionally protected liberty interest in refusing unwanted medical treatment[.]” Citing the Supreme Court’s decision in Washington v. Glucksberg, Judge Collins noted that the right to refuse unwanted medical treatment is “entirely consistent with this Nation’s history and constitutional traditions,” and that HFDF’s allegations in this case “are sufficient to invoke that fundamental right.”

The Ninth Circuit ruling today demonstrates that the court saw through LAUSD’s monkey business, and in so doing, it made clear that American’s cherished rights to self-determination, including the sacred right of bodily autonomy in matters of health, are not negotiable. This is a great triumph for the truth, decency, and what is right.


Hunter Biden Found Guilty As Democrats Prepare To Flush His Poopy Pants Father Before DNC