Watch: J.D. Vance Exposes Democrat Open Border Election Scheme, Slams Race-Baiting CNN Journalist
Speaking with a Newsmax reporter while visiting the U.S.-Mexico border this week, Donald Trump’s VP running mate J.D. Vance explained why he believes Democrats are purposely opening the floodgates for illegal aliens to enter America.
Senator JD Vance on Border Czar Kamala Harris:
“They want to import millions of illegal aliens, give them the right to vote, give the amnesty, and then they don’t have to worry about persuading their own citizens anymore because they’ve imported a new group of voters.”? pic.twitter.com/sbEAxbGugh— Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) August 2, 2024
“The why? You don’t have to guess at it, because they say it. Now, of course they accuse Republicans of racism for saying this, but you just take the Democrats’ own words. They say they want to import millions of illegal aliens, give them the right to vote, give them amnesty, and then they don’t have to worry about persuading their own citizens anymore because they then have imported a new group of voters,” Vance explained.
He continued, “And, it’s really scandalous if you think about, why wouldn’t you want to persuade your own people that you have the best policies to improve their lives? It shows how they completely disrespect their own countrymen.”
Vance also talked with CNN reporter Steve Contorno during his border visit in an encounter that went viral online.
Asked if Trump’s comments about Kamala Harris only recently identifying as black instead of Indian give him “any pause,” Vance said that as a father of three biracial children the remark doesn’t bother him.
“All he said is that Kamala Harris is a chameleon. She goes to Georgia two days ago, she was raised in Canada, and she put on a fake southern accent. She is everything to everybody and she pretends to be somebody different depending on which audience she’s in front of. I think it’s totally reasonable for the president to call that out and that’s all he did.
He continued, “I mean, she’s running as a ‘tough-on-crime’ prosecutor even though she implemented open border policies. She’s saying she wants to support the police, yet she wanted to defund the police just three years ago. It’s totally reasonable to call out the fact that she pretends to be somebody different depending on the audience she’s talking to.”
JD Vance obliterates CNN reporter trying to race-bait about Kamala Harris: pic.twitter.com/HTHorM4zrj
— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) August 1, 2024
Evangelical Zionists Pushing the World Into Armageddon
For many American Christians, it will always be Israel First.
Also:
Will Hologram Technology Be Used To Fake Jesus’ Return?
Brian Wilson discusses how false signs, miracles, and wonders could be used to control various religious populations.
Also:
Kamala Harris Calls Herself ‘President’ During Eulogy Speech at Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee’s Funeral — VIDEO
While delivering a eulogy at Democrat Representative Sheila Jackson Lee’s funeral in Houston, Texas, Vice President Kamala Harris referred to herself as the President.
“…which as a U.S. Senator, I was proud to co-sponsor and then as President– as Vice President it was my honor with the President…” Harris said, referencing how she helped get the legislation Lee introduced to make Juneteenth (the day marking the end of slavery in the US) a federal holiday.
VP @KamalaHarris accidentally referred to herself as “president” before correcting herself.
— Etana Hecht ?? ?? (@etanadeeIL) August 1, 2024
She also put on a southern accent at the eulogy of Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee.
Weird. pic.twitter.com/wwROVno04Y
Directly after the mix-up, the audience applauded, potentially due to her ongoing Presidential bid.
Harris is not the only one confused about her roll in government.
In 2021 President Joe Biden referred to Harris as the President.
Not trying to scare you or anything…
— Brilyn Hollyhand (@BrilynHollyhand) December 17, 2021
But Joe Biden just called Kamala…
“PRESIDENT Harris” !?! ??? pic.twitter.com/bVGLaESaMG
Infowars also reported how due to Harris being surrounded by black people, she tailored her accent accordingly in order to fit in with the other ethnicity, a common practice among Democrats.
BREAKING VIDEO: Male Olympic Boxer Savagely Assaults Woman On International Television
Friday Live: Whistleblowers Expose Trump Shooting Inside Job!
“The American Journal” is live every weekday from 8-11 am CST.
Inside job! https://t.co/FY4NOkyxGn
— Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) August 2, 2024
Follow The American Journal on Telegram:
Vermont Supreme Court Rules Parents Can’t Sue School for Giving 6-year-old Unwanted Covid Jab
(LifeSiteNews) – The Vermont Supreme Court rejected a family’s lawsuit against the Windham Southeast School District for accidentally injecting their (at the time) six-year-old child with a COVID-19 vaccine without their consent, ruling that the error was covered by a federal liability shield.
Fox 26 reported that during a 2021 clinic hosted by the district and the Vermont Department of Health, the child identified only as LP had a directive in place from the father, accepted by school officials, that the child was not to be vaccinated. However, the child was given one dose of Pfizer’s mRNA-based COVID shot after being erroneously given the name tag of a child with no such restriction.
Officials notified the parents and apologized, and the parents pulled their child from Windham’s Academy School.
“Thankfully, we are not aware of any harm to the student because of this mistake,” Windham Southeast superintendent Mark Speno said in a 2021 apology letter. “We take our responsibilities to students and families very seriously, and we respect parents’ rights to make health care decisions for their children.”
That was not sufficient for the parents, who sued. But last week, the state’s highest court ruled that the federal Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act of 2005 shielded school officials from liability.
“To avoid dismissal on immunity grounds, plaintiffs would have had to present wellpleaded allegations showing that (1) at least one defendant was not a covered person, (2) some conduct by a defendant was not causally related to administering a covered countermeasure, (3) the substance injected into L.P. was not a covered countermeasure, or (4) there was no PREP Act declaration in effect at the time L.P. was injected,” the court explained.
According to the Congressional Research Service (CRS), the PREP Act empowers the federal government to “limit legal liability for losses relating to the administration of medical countermeasures such as diagnostics, treatments, and vaccines.” Near the beginning of the 2020 COVID-19 outbreak, the Trump administration invoked the Act in declaring the virus a “public health emergency.”
Under this “sweeping” immunity, CRS explains, the federal government, state governments, “manufacturers and distributors of covered countermeasures,” and licensed or otherwise-authorized health professionals distributing those countermeasures are shielded from “all claims of loss” stemming from those countermeasures, with the exception of “death or serious physical injury” brought about through “willful misconduct,” a standard that, among other hurdles, requires the offender to have acted “intentionally to achieve a wrongful purpose.”
A large body of evidence identifies significant risks to the COVID vaccines, which were developed and reviewed in a fraction of the time vaccines usually take under former President Donald Trump’s Operation Warp Speed initiative. Among it, the federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) reports 37,734 deaths, 217,112 hospitalizations, 21,793 heart attacks, and 28,490 myocarditis and pericarditis cases as of June 28, among other ailments. U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) researchers have recognized a “high verification rate of reports of myocarditis to VAERS after mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccination,” leading to the conclusion that “under-reporting is more likely” than over-reporting.
An analysis of 99 million people across eight countries published in February in the journal Vaccine “observed significantly higher risks of myocarditis following the first, second and third doses” of mRNA-based COVID vaccines, as well as signs of increased risk of “pericarditis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis,” and other “potential safety signals that require further investigation.” In April, the CDC was forced to release by court order 780,000 previously undisclosed reports of serious adverse reactions, and a study out of Japan found “statistically significant increases” in cancer deaths after third doses of mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines and offered several theories for a causal link.
The issue is particularly egregious in the case of children, who evidence finds face little to no danger from COVID itself. In February, the first interim report of a grand jury impaneled by Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis to investigate the COVID vaccines determined among other things that COVID was “statistically almost harmless” to children and most adults.
EXCLUSIVE: Pastor Who Predicted Trump Would Be Shot In The Ear Makes New Bombshell Predictions