Bill Gates’ Fake Meat Linked to ‘Premature Death’, Study Finds
Bill Gates’ synthetic meat products can increase the risk of severe heart disease and premature death, according to a new study. Researchers from the University of São Paulo and Imperial College London assessed the diets of more […]
The post Bill Gates’ Fake Meat Linked to ‘Premature Death’, Study Finds appeared first on The People’s Voice.
Putin Says The Biggest Danger To Europe Is The US
Russian President Vladimir Putin believes that Europe should maintain good relations with Moscow if it wants to retain its status as one of the centers of world development. Putin made the comments on Friday during […]
The post Putin Says The Biggest Danger To Europe Is The US appeared first on The People’s Voice.
Hunter Biden’s Daughter Testifies About Father’s Erratic Behavior Under the Influence of Cocaine
Presidential son Hunter Biden has been found guilty of all three felony charges related to the purchase of a revolver in 2018. Two of the jurors in the case admitted that the verdict was influenced by his eldest daughter Naomi’s testimony, which may have been a critical mistake for the defense.
Biden’s daughter testified on June 7, and she recounted Hunter’s erratic behavior in the days after he illegally lied about his crack cocaine addiction to purchase a .38-caliber revolver on Oct. 12, 2018. She said her father texted her at 2 a.m. on Oct. 18, asking if she could meet him somewhere in Manhattan so they could exchange cars after she used his Ford Raptor pickup. However, he did not show up.
Prosecutors presented evidence suggesting Hunter was arranging to buy crack cocaine during that period.
“I’m really sad, Dad,” Naomi texted Hunter later that day. “I can’t take this. I don’t know what to say. I just miss you so much. And want to hang out with you.”
Hunter lied on a mandatory gun-purchase form by saying he was not illegally using or addicted to drugs back then and now he is set to face 25 years in jail. No sentencing date yet has been announced. (Related: Hunter Biden’s “historic” criminal trial will probe drug addiction and gun charges.)
One of the jurors from upper Delaware told the New York Post that it just seemed so sad for Naomi to see her father in such a state.
“She was happy when she thought he was getting better, but then he relapsed,” the 51-year-old woman added.
Another juror, who is a 68-year-old man from Sussex County, agreed that Naomi’s testimony was effective but it worked not in the way Hunter’s lawyers had expected.
“I don’t think any daughter should have to be up there testifying on her father’s behalf. That was heart-wrenching and I think all the jurors felt the same thing,” he said, adding that defense lawyer Abbe Lowell made the wrong move by calling Naomi to the stand. “He probably would not have called her.”
Hunter has pleaded not guilty to federal charges, including lying about his addiction when applying for a Colt Cobra revolver and illegally possessing the weapon for 11 days. Throughout the five-day trial, witnesses, including Hunter’s ex-wife, former girlfriend and sister-in-law, testified about his use of cocaine. His sister-in-law, Hallie Biden, testified that she found the gun in question but she immediately discarded it out of concern for Hunter’s and her children’s safety.
Lowell at one point claimed Hunter did not intend to deceive, believing he was not an addict at the time. The president’s son stated in a 2023 hearing that he had been sober since 2019.
“I am more grateful today for the love and support I experienced this last week from Melissa, my family, my friends, and my community than I am disappointed by the outcome,” Hunter said in the first statement he released after the decision was announced. “Recovery is possible by the grace of God and I am blessed to experience that gift one day at a time.”
President Joe Biden told ABC News that he would not pardon his son if convicted. Sentencing guidelines for the charges range from 15 to 21 months, but similar cases often result in shorter sentences or alternatives to incarceration.
Joe Biden says will “respect” the ruling
The president, in his first comment after Hunter was found guilty on all three counts in his federal gun trial, expressed love for his son and vowed to “accept the verdict” handed down by the jury.
“As I said last week, I am the president, but I am also a dad,” the president said. “Jill and I love our son, and we are so proud of the man he is today. So many families who have had loved ones battle addiction understand the feeling of pride seeing someone you love come out the other side and be so strong and resilient in recovery.”
He further reiterated that he will accept the outcome of this case and will continue to respect the judicial process as Hunter considers an appeal. “Jill and I will always be there for Hunter and the rest of our family with our love and support. Nothing will ever change that.”
The president went to Delaware to meet Hunter, who immediately greeted his father when the president arrived, getting out of the motorcade and embracing on the tarmac. Hunter was joined by his wife, Melissa and their son, Beau.
Biden did not make an appearance at his son’s trial, but First Lady Jill Biden was almost always there at the hearings and walked out of the courthouse hand-in-hand with Hunter after the guilty verdict was announced.
Check out BidenCrimeFamily.news to read more stories related to the Bidens’ illegal dealings and actions.
Democrat Judges Rule Middle Schooler’s ‘Only Two Genders’ T-Shirt can be Censored by School
(LifeSiteNews) — A federal court ruled in favor of a Massachusetts school district that banned a student from wearing a shirt stating the biological fact that “There are only two genders.”
Chief Judge David Barron, an Obama appointee, ruled that school administrators have leeway under the First Amendment to regulate content that might allegedly be “demeaning.”
He was joined by fellow Obama appointee Judge Ojetta Thompson and Biden appointee Judge Lara Montecalvo. Judge Barron previously blamed the student’s shirt for “threatening messages” left at the school, according to NBC News’ paraphrase of his comments.
However, advocates of the student blasted the First Circuit Court of Appeals, saying it erred in the case L.M. v. Town of Middleborough.
Alliance Defending Freedom, which represented student Liam Morrison, said an appeal is likely. Morrison, after being told not to wear the first shirt, later wore a shirt saying, “There are [censored] genders.”
“Students don’t lose their free speech rights the moment they walk into a school building,” Senior Counsel David Cortman stated in a news release, responding to the Sunday ruling.
“This case isn’t about T-shirts; it’s about a public school telling a middle-schooler that he isn’t allowed to express a view that differs from their own,” Cortman stated. “The school actively promotes its view about gender through posters and ‘Pride’ events, and it encourages students to wear clothing with messages on the same topic—so long as that clothing expresses the school’s preferred views on the subject.”
“Our legal system is built on the truth that the government cannot silence any speaker just because it disapproves of what they say,” Cortman stated. “The 1st Circuit erred in its decision denying L.M. his right to free speech, and we are reviewing all legal options including appealing this decision.”
An attorney who often has represented liberal causes in the federal court system also criticized the judge’s decision.
The Supreme Court has previously ruled in favor of student free speech rights on contentious issues. For example, in 1969, the Court ruled in Tinker v. Des MoinesIndependent Community School District that students could wear black armbands to school in protest of the war in Vietnam. In 2021, the Supreme Court ruled in B.L. v. Mahanoy Area School District in favor of a student who was punished for posting vulgar comments on her personal social media while off-campus.
“The decision substantially lowers the bar for allowing school authorities to censor student speech considered ‘demeaning,’ even if it doesn’t target any particular student or students, and even if it is not disruptive,” Robert Corn-Revere with the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression told LifeSiteNews via email. FIRE submitted a brief in support of Morrison.
“And it empowers school officials to impose what views will be orthodox,” Corn-Revere said. “The holding is inconsistent with Tinker, which held that neither students nor teachers shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse gate, and with the Supreme Court’s more recent holding in Mahanoy Area School District.”
The Massachusetts Family Institute, which supports Morrison, also criticized the decision.
“This case is about much more than a t-shirt,” the group wrote on X (formerly Twitter). “The court’s decision is not only a threat to the free speech rights of public school students across the country, but a threat to basic biological truths. While we are disappointed in this decision, we aren’t done fighting yet.”
“While we are disappointed in this decision, we aren’t done fighting yet,” the group also wrote in a statement. “Along with our partners at Alliance Defending Freedom, we are reviewing all legal options, including appealing to the United States Supreme Court. Please pray for continued strength for Liam and his family, as well as wisdom for our legal team.”
‘Are their feelings more important than my rights?’ Morrison says
Morrison’s expression of the biological reality of sex and his subsequent punishment last year attracted further attention after Libs of TikTok posted a powerful speech he gave in front of the school board.
“I was told that people were complaining about the words on my shirt, that my shirt was making some students feel ‘unsafe,’” he said. “Yes, words on a shirt made people feel unsafe. They told me that I wasn’t in trouble, but it sure felt like I was.”
“What did my shirt say? Five simple words: ‘There are only two genders.’ Nothing harmful, nothing threatening. Just a statement I believe to be a fact. I have been told that my shirt was targeting a protected class,” he said.
“Who is this ‘protected class’? Are their feelings more important than my rights?”
Eight Illegal Aliens, Suspected to be Terrorists, Arrested in New York, Philadelphia & Los Angeles
Ever since 9/11, the United States government via the Patriot Act has been illegally spying on Americans under the guise of fighting terrorism. Why, then, do illegal aliens continue to flood the country with reckless abandon?
The latest illegal alien incident occurred in three major U.S. cities – New York, Philadelphia and Los Angeles – where eight men from Tajikistan, suspected to have connections to ISIS, were arrested.
For months before their arrest, the men were under surveillance by the FBI’s Joint Terrorism Task Force and Customs Enforcement after they strolled across America’s open southern border in the spring of 2023, compliments of the Biden regime.
According to reports, none of the men have yet been charged with any kind of terrorist connection or plot. However, the FBI reportedly alerted ICE that the men could be connected to ISIS and should thus be arrested on immigration charges.
Two sources familiar with the matter who spoke with NBC News said the men are detained and now face removal proceedings before an immigration judge. At some point in the future, the men could also face terrorism-related charges.
(Related: Meanwhile, politicians are devoting their time to criminalizing “hate speech” with stricter punishments.)
FBI warning of “coordinated attack” in major U.S. cities
The news of this comes just months after FBI Director Christopher Wray warned Congress that his agency fears a “coordinated attack” in major U.S. cities. Just prior to that warning, ISIS, or so we are told, attacked a concert hall in Moscow, killing 145 people.
“Our most immediate concern has been that individuals or small groups will draw twisted inspiration from the events in the Middle East to carry out attacks here at home,” Wray told a House Appropriations subcommittee back in April.
“But now, increasingly concerning is the potential for a coordinated attack here in the homeland, akin to the ISIS-K attack we saw at the Russia concert hall a couple weeks ago.”
As all of this is happening, an Iranian intelligence officer by the name of Majid Dastjani Farahani is said to still be on the loose with plans to “kill Trump-era officials,” according to the media.
Much like what happened in the aftermath of 9/11, we are witnessing what appears to be the makings of another “war on terror” situation where the powers that be want us all to be fearful of ISIS or whatever boogeyman they trot out next so that we will sacrifice more of our freedoms of the altar of “peace and safety.”
If the government was really concerned about the threat of terror, it would close the southern border and stop the illegal invasion that fuels terror incidents in the first place.
Do not forget that these eight now-detained men are just a drop in the bucket. At least 434,800 migrants have been flown directly into the U.S. via the Biden regime’s CHNV mass parole program. They hail from Haiti, Venezuela, Cuba and Nicaragua.
“And a huge number of them are going to Florida,” someone wrote on X about these migrants. “It’s intentional replacement and overwhelming American states with a flood of third world nationals.”
“Problem, reaction, solution,” wrote another about the nightmare being unleashed on America. “The government allows millions to illegally come into the country, now they have to pass laws to take everyone’s freedom away. All by design.”
Instead of dealing with the real problems this country faces, the powers that be are instead prosecuting children for leaving tire marks on LGBT “rainbow” street murals and going after supporters of Donald Trump – imagine that, emphasized someone else.
Illegal immigration is destroying America. Learn more at InvasionUSA.news.
Russian Troops Never Intended to Capture Kiev – Putin
Russian forces did not plan to storm Kiev when they advanced towards the Ukrainian capital in the first weeks of the conflict between the two countries, President Vladimir Putin has said.
During a meeting with his Russia’s top diplomats on Friday, Putin noted continued “speculation” in Ukraine and the West about the intentions of Russian units when they reached the outskirts of Kiev in late February 2022.
“But there was no political decision to storm the city of 3 million, no matter what anyone says due to their lack of thought,” Putin insisted.
According to the president, the Russian advance towards Kiev was “nothing more than an operation to persuade the Ukrainian regime to [make] peace.”
“The troops were there to motivate the Ukrainian side to engage in negotiations, to try to find an acceptable solution and this way end the war unleashed by Kiev against Donbass back in 2014,” he said.
The conflict between the Ukrainian government and the People’s Republics of Donetsk and Lugansk, which erupted after the Western-backed coup in Kiev in February 2014, “posed a threat to the security of our country, to the security of Russia,” Putin stressed.
The move by Russia did result in talks that led to agreements that “in principle, suited both Moscow and Kiev,” he said, referring to the negotiations that took place between the two sides in the Turkish city of Istanbul in late March 2022.
“On March 29, 2022, we withdrew our troops from Kiev because we were assured that it was essential to create conditions for the conclusion of the political negotiating process,” the president recalled. “Our Western colleagues”insisted back then that the Ukrainian authorities “cannot sign such agreements… with a gun to their head,” he added.
However, Kiev and its Western backers have been claiming that the Russian withdrawal from the area of the Ukrainian capital was not a goodwill gesture by Moscow, but the result of military successes achieved by Kiev’s troops. Already in April 2022, US President Joe Biden said “the ‘Battle of Kiev’ was a historic victory… won by the Ukrainian people with unprecedented assistance by the US and our allies.”