Joe Biden Says He Is Preparing To ‘Pass the Baton’ to Kamala Harris
Joe Biden has admitted that he is preparing to ‘pass the baton’ of being the Democratic Presidential nominee to Kamala Harris. According to CNN, Biden is “being receptive” to calls for him to step aside […]
The post Joe Biden Says He Is Preparing To ‘Pass the Baton’ to Kamala Harris appeared first on The People’s Voice.
Senior Biden Staffer Says Elite Must ‘Turn Their Fire’ on Trump Following Failed Assassination
A senior Biden White House staffer has declared that the global elite must “turn their fire” on former President Donald Trump following his assassination attempt on Saturday. CNN contributor and former Biden White House communications […]
The post Senior Biden Staffer Says Elite Must ‘Turn Their Fire’ on Trump Following Failed Assassination appeared first on The People’s Voice.
Snipers INSIDE Building Used by Failed Trump Assassin did Nothing to Stop the Attack, says Local Cop
A local law enforcement officer with “direct knowledge” of the situation told CBS News anchor Anna Schecter this week that not one, not two, but three snipers from Beaver County, Penn., were present inside the building where shooter Thomas Matthew Crooks reportedly tried to assassinate Donald Trump.
One of the snipers who was stationed on the second floor of the American Glass Research building saw Crooks standing outside and looking up at the roof before climbing to the top to do the deed. Crooks reportedly walked away, returned, and “whipped out his phone” after the sniper snapped a couple pictures of him.
Crooks then proceeded to take out a rangefinder, prompting the sniper to radio a command post. Crooks disappeared after that only to return a third time with a backpack in tow, prompting the snipers to call the command post a second time to report what they saw.
By the time local law enforcement arrived on the scene for backup, Crooks had already climbed to the top of the building where he positioned himself behind the view of the snipers inside the building.
“Two other officers who heard the sniper’s call tried to get onto the roof,” CBS News reported, “but by that time, a Secret Service sniper had already killed Crooks,” according to the officer on scene.
(Related: Remember when Lincoln Project co-founder Rick Wilson publicly stated to MSNBC that he wanted someone to put a “bullet” into Trump?)
What really happened in Butler?
Take note of the fact that local law enforcement snipers had their eyes on Crooks the entire time, having taken pictures of him and even notifying their command post of his movements. And yet they did nothing about it, allowing Crooks to shoot at Trump, “at which point Secret Service snipers returned fire and killed him,” to quote one media source.
It almost seems as though Beaver County’s police officers were told to stand down while Crooks positioned himself and opened fire. Then and only then did anyone intervene, and at that point it was federal Secret Service rather than the snipers who were inside the building to keep an eye on the situation.
The blame game has since commenced with Secret Service blaming local law enforcement in Butler for the fiasco, and vice versa. Neither group is willing to admit that it dropped the ball in keeping the rally orderly and shooting-free.
“There was [sic] local police in that building,” commented Secret Service Director Kim Cheatle, a close friend of the Biden Crime Family. “There was [sic] local police in the area that were responsible for the outer perimeter of the building.”
A former Secret Service agent spoke out against Cheatle for saying this, arguing that Secret Service “is responsible for everything, not just the inner perimeter.”
“They should make sure all of this is covered,” the former agent added. “Officers inside a building: that’s not mitigating a high-ground vulnerability.
Patrick Yoes, national president of the Fraternal Order of Police, argued back that none of this is the snipers’ fault even though they were stationed inside the building to protect the former president.
“Whatever happened in Butler, this was not a failure of the local, state or federal officers on the ground who responded to the shots fired at former President Trump,” Yoes said. “They acted heroically and put their lives on the line to protect everyone at the event and we must recognize that.”
“This is a failure at the management or command level who failed to secure an obvious weakness in the security of this event.”
The latest news about Trump and the election this fall can be found at Trump.news.
Leftists Introduce ‘CLIMATE MURDER’ Charges to Try to Terminate the Oil Industry & Force Automobile Manufacturers to go All Electric
If shutting down oil pipelines, banning fracking and punishing automobile manufacturers for their “carbon footprint” wasn’t enough, the left-wing climate change activists are now looking to use their hysterical conjecture and authoritarian climate lawfare to end the oil industry as we know it and make Americans dependent on an electric vehicle grid.
“Climate murder” charges are coming
To accomplish this, left-wing climate activists (who believe the world is ending if we don’t stop carbon emissions) are introducing a new concept called “CLIMATE MURDER.” Under this authoritarian new rule, oil companies can be accused of second-degree murder when temperatures rise in the summer, leading to inevitable heat-related deaths.
If accepted as precedent, the same “climate murder” conjecture can apply to deaths that result from other natural weather phenomenon such as tornadoes, earthquakes, lightning, flash-flooding, wildfires and hurricanes.
It’s typical leftist logic. It’s no different than when Democrats blame law-abiding gun owners for the heinous acts of school shooters. It’s no different than blaming guns for acts committed by individuals with criminal intent. It’s no different than new gun laws that restrict the freedoms of people who did not commit the crime. Leftists have repeatedly said they want to prosecute the National Rifle Association for criminal acts that they do not commit.
Of course, the hysterical left never calls for justice when a pharmaceutical product is directly linked to a person’s death. Instead, the Democrats mandate that people take poison, and believe they will never be held accountable for forcing people to take shots that injure and kill people.
Prosecutors are looking to blame heat waves on oil companies and make them responsible for deaths
Former federal prosecutor Cindy Cho was one of the first to advocate for second-degree murder prosecutions against major fossil fuel companies. Her outlandish opinion comes in response to the deadly heat wave that ravaged Maricopa County, Arizona, in July 2023, claiming the lives of 403 residents.
The premise of Cho’s argument is chillingly straightforward: Big Oil, alongside other fossil fuel giants, knowingly contributed to the atmospheric carbon buildup that has intensified global temperatures, thereby directly contributing to extreme weather events like the Arizona heat wave. This, she contends, amounts to culpable recklessness akin to second-degree murder under the law.
If these prosecutors get their way, they will be able to breakup the entire energy infrastructure, sending oil executives to prison, levying fines that will make it all but impossible to continue drilling and providing affordable gas and diesel. Of course, this will absolutely collapse our economy and destroy American civilization, leaving tens of millions of families unable to afford food and transportation.
Public Citizen released a memo detailing the legal foundations for such prosecutions. The memo claims that prosecuting fossil fuel companies for climate-related deaths is not only morally justified but also legally feasible. They urge local prosecutors to initiate criminal investigations into these corporations’ roles in climate-related fatalities.
Bill McKibben, a prominent climate activist, added fuel to the fire, stating, “What’s happened to the climate is a crime.” McKibben argues that fossil fuel companies, despite clear warnings from the scientific community, continued to exacerbate climate change unabatedly, resulting in a mounting death toll and shattered futures. In the medical community, there are talks of adding “climate change” to death certificates. One study blames a certain level of human breathing for generating enough carbon emissions to kill someone.
However, not everyone shares these outlandish, hysterical perspectives on weather, temperature and death. Marc Morano of Climate Depot dismissed these calls for prosecution as sensationalism, labeling them part of a broader agenda to merge public health concerns with climate change narratives. Morano contends that attributing “climate homicide” to fossil fuel companies overlooks the broader context of human adaptation to climate variability, citing statistics purportedly showing a decline in climate-related deaths since 1920, thanks in part to technological advancements fueled by fossil fuels.
Ukrainian Neo-Nazi Mocks Auschwitz Victims
Social media users have called out a member of Ukraine’s 3rd Assault Brigade, which includes fighters from the reformed neo-Nazi Azov Regiment, over several posts that appear to mock those who were killed at the Auschwitz-Birkenau concentration camp.
In a series of posts on Instagram, Nikita Miroschenko, a member of the brigade, shared photos and reels of him paying a visit to the death camp in Poland several weeks ago. One of the reels showed the gates of Auschwitz with the infamous Nazi slogan “Arbeit macht frei” with German march music playing in the background. The post was accompanied by a caption reading: “We commemorated the memory, but there is one nuance.”
A second reel showed Miroschenko’s girlfriend Anastasia Korshykova, a member of the same brigade, standing in front of the death camp. This image was juxtaposed with a meme known as “Disaster Girl,” featuring a girl staring at the camera as a house burns behind her. The clip was accompanied by the song ‘Baby on Fire’ by the South African hip-hop group Die Antwoor.
Instagram / khran1t3ltv0eytayni
Miroschenko was also pictured at Auschwitz wearing a T-shirt that read: “Where we are, there is no place for anyone else” – a phrase attributed to Nazi leader Adolf Hitler.
The flurry of posts, which appeared to mock the memory of the more than a million Jews, Poles, Roma, and Soviet prisoners of war who were killed at the camp, sparked a firestorm on social media. Moss Robeson, a self-described researcher of Ukrainian fascism, noted that “it’s unreal how Meta has let Ukrainian Nazis fester while it censors Palestinians and anti-Zionist voices in the name of ‘anti-Semitism’.”
READ MORE: Ukrainian neo-Nazis planning European PR tour
Jake Hanrahan described one of Miroschenko’s posts as “disgusting,”while Daniel Mayakovsky remarked that “if you oppose Israel’s genocide in Gaza, you are an anti-Semite according to the Western media… but if you go to Auschwitz with a T-shirt quoting Hitler to gloat about killing Jews, then Europe and the US send you weapons.”
Social media users also highlighted another image of Miroschenko smiling against the backdrop of a quote by another Nazi leader Herman Goring, which read: “Marriage[s] between Jews and subjects of the state of German or related blood are forbidden.” Mayakovsky denounced the image, suggesting that the Ukrainian soldier had “visited Auschwitz to enjoy what Hitler did.” “They are sick,” he added.
Miroschenko’s controversial posts came to public attention as his brigade announced a tour of several EU countries to seek more support in the fight against Russia. Moscow has long warned about neo-Nazi ideology flourishing in Ukraine, saying that the “denazification” of its neighbor was one of the key goals of the ongoing military campaign.
House GOP says Manhattan DA, Judge Merchan Violated Trump’s Constitutional and Legal Rights
Republicans in the House Judiciary Committee, led by Chairman Jim Jordan, released a report this week claiming that both the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office and New York Judge Juan Merchan violated the constitutional and legal rights of Donald Trump.
Entitled “Lawfare: How the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office and a New York State Judge Violated the Constitutional and Legal Rights of President Donald J. Trump,” the report is based on extensive investigations by the Committee and the Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government that peg Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg and Judge Merchan as acting in violation of the law with their pursuit of Trump.
After scrutinizing the 34-count criminal indictment against Trump, announced on April 4, 2023, investigators made the following discoveries about the legal and procedural defects in Bragg’s prosecution of Trump:
1) Bragg presented an unprecedented and unconstitutional theory of criminal liability that did not require jury unanimity on each element of the criminal offenses.
2) Bragg overreached into federal jurisdiction by prosecuting alleged violations of federal campaign finance laws, reserved strictly for federal authorities, with no intervention from the Biden regime to uphold federal interests.
As for Judge Merchan, the report identified the following anomalies with the way he handled Trump:
1) Merchan failed to recuse himself despite clear political bias.
2) Merchan imposed an unconstitutional gag order on Trump during the trial.
3) Merchan allowed admission of inadmissible, irrelevant and prejudicial testimony against Trump.
4) Merchan refused to allow former Federal Election Commission (FEC) Chairman Bradley Smith to testify regarding the many complexities of the Federal Election Campaign Act.
The full interim staff report is available for viewing at this link.
(Related: If Trump is reelected this fall, he says he will prosecute everyone involved in stealing the last election from him with voter fraud.)
Bragg and Merchan violated their oaths
Bragg, Merchan and the rest of the anti-Trump crusaders who participated in this witch hunt acted well outside the bounds of the law. Keep in mind that both Bragg and Merchan swore an oath of office to uphold the Constitution, which they failed to do in the Trump case.
“The findings emphasize that both Bragg and Merchan, who took oaths to support the U.S. Constitution and the New York State Constitution, deviated from their constitutional responsibilities in their pursuit of Trump’s indictment and conviction,” reports Your News.
“Given the legal and constitutional errors cited in the indictment and trial, the report suggests that an honest review of the facts and law by appellate courts could lead to the conviction being vacated and the indictment dismissed with prejudice. This, according to the report, would help restore public trust in the American justice system. The Committee and Select Subcommittee will continue to oversee and address the broader implications of such politically motivated legal actions.”
In the comments, someone outraged about the revelations noted that you know you are “in a swamp full of alligators” when you have local DAs, in this case Bragg, deciding federal law.
“Now something must be done about this miscarriage of justice instead of just talking about it,” wrote another.
“That judge should be disbarred and put in jail for his corruption,” said someone else, adding that there are probably going to be a whole lot of people who retire before Trump is inevitably reelected back to the White House this fall.
“I want to see that judge sitting in prison,” said another. “Then put him in contempt-of-court solitary for a few weeks when he inevitably thinks he is the legalest person in the room.”
The latest news about Trump’s presidential aspirations can be found at Trump.news.