Candace Owens Blows Lid on Global Pedophile Ring Labeling Critics ‘Anti-Semites’
Conservative commentator Candace Owens agreed with a guest who recently expressed that pedophiles and their victims are installed in positions of power around the globe, making them easier to blackmail and control.
Appearing on Owens’ podcast last week, journalist Xavier Poussard discussed his theory not only that the wife of French President Emmanuel Macron, Brigette, is actually a man, but that Macron was groomed in transgender circles from an early age.
This blew my mind… 🤯
— MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) September 3, 2024
Is it Plausible that they are Putting Pedophiles and their Victims in Positions of Power All over the World?
• Not much is known about Emmanuel Macron…
—— a woman named Françoise Noguès, was presented as the grandmother that raised Macron.
—— the… https://t.co/EjGfnCjpwB pic.twitter.com/Qy89LhvNHA
“First of all, we don’t know much about Macron. He grew up with his grandmother, and the house they lived in is now closed. It’s very strange,” Poussard said. “There are no photos that exist of Macron with his parents before the age of 25.”
“What we discovered is that a woman named Françoise Noguis, who was presented as the mother of Emmanuel Macron, was in charge of a medical program for transgender people in France,” Poussard continued.
“This information was never in the newspapers, and there are testimonies that we found where transgender people are thanking Françoise Noguis for this program. And, the strange point here is when we researched the life of Jean-Michel Trogneux [Brigitte’s brother] with Brigitte, we found that they’re connected to Emmanuel Macron.”
The French researcher pointed out people like himself who highlight the anomalies, including Macron’s close ties to David de Rothschild and the World Jewish Congress, are typically dismissed as anti-Semitic.
The World Jewish Congress, Poussard said, is the group “with blackmail on people who are really puppets and do what they’re told because they don’t want their private lives shown to the public.”
Owens went on to praise the journalist’s work, adding he bolstered “my belief that what we have right now is a pedophile ring that has assumed a ton of power in the world by pretending that any person that notices this pedophile ring is an anti-semite.”
“My theory is that these people are not Jewish. I think that they publicly present themselves as being Jewish, but in reality, they worship and follow an entirely different faith, and it’s satanic… And it came to America. And when these pedophiles get caught, they say, ‘Oh, I’m Jewish. This is blood libel. This is blood libel,’” Owens stated.
The conservative firebrand concluded the segment by urging people of the Jewish faith to “wake up and to understand that this is not blood libel. This is not anti-semitism.”
“These are demonic, monstrous people that are using Judaism to hide what their actions are.”
In another portion of the interview, Owens and Poussard did a deep dive into evidence suggesting Brigitte was born a man.
Candace Owens Goes Deeper and Speaks to the Journalist who Exposed Brigitte Macron as a 47 Year Old Man who Preyed on a 14 Year old Emmanuel Macron
— MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) September 2, 2024
• The Brigitte Macron you see today was born a man named, Jean Michel Trogneux, and assumed the identify of his sister Brigitte… pic.twitter.com/x0seP3fV5c
Owens in June defended claims the wife of Emmanuel Macron was born a man amid a tense interview with Piers Morgan.
BREAKING: Piers Morgan has bet Candace Owens $100,000 to a charity of her choice that Brigette Macron was born a woman.
— Piers Morgan Uncensored (@PiersUncensored) June 12, 2024
Watch more: https://t.co/ySeNwOMX8d@RealCandaceO | @piersmorgan pic.twitter.com/cKezpG06YW
Watch the full podcast below:
EU Says It Regrets That Mongolia Refused To Arrest Putin
The Eurpean Union is upset that the Mongolian Government “did not comply with its obligations” by failing to execute an ICC warrant, according to Brussels. The EU has “taken note” of President Vladimir Putin’s visit […]
The post EU Says It Regrets That Mongolia Refused To Arrest Putin appeared first on The People’s Voice.
Ron Paul: Trump and Harris Ignore a Great Danger Facing America
The Penn Wharton Budget Model, a think tank headquartered at the University of Pennsylvania, recently released a study claiming former President Donald Trump’s economic plans would add about four trillion dollars to the national deficit over ten years while Vice President Kamala Harris’s economic plans would add about two trillion dollars.
Vice President Harris would increase the deficit largely through expanding refundable tax credits such as the child tax credit. Low-income Americans can qualify for refundable tax credits even if they have less federal tax liability. So this proposal includes a welfare program disguised as a tax credit. Vice President Harris also proposes spending 40 billion dollars on an “innovation fund” to increase the supply of “affordable” housing. Another of the vice president’s proposals is providing first-time homebuyers with up to 25,000 dollars in downpayment assistance.
Harris’s proposals could contribute to a new housing bubble. This bubble would inevitably burst, leading to an economic crisis likely worse than the “Great Recession” that followed the bursting of the last housing bubble. One reason it could be worse is that it may be accompanied by the bursting of several other bubbles and the rejection of the dollar’s world reserve currency status.
According to the study, President Trump will increase the deficit by cutting taxes without also cutting spending. President Trump has pledged to renew the 2017 tax cuts and also promised to stop taxing Social Security benefits. Trump’s tax cuts would help spur economic growth, job creation, and higher tax revenue. The study indicates that the pro-growth effects of Trump’s tax cuts are the reason it projects Trump’s tax policy will “only” increase the federal deficit by 4.1 trillion dollars over ten years as opposed to 5.8 trillion dollars.
It is common to describe tax cuts as “costing” the government. Saying tax cuts cost the government assumes that the government has a moral claim over an individual’s earnings, so anytime those running the government allow individuals to keep more of their money the rulers are being generous. The truth is that income belongs to the people who earn it and that saying tax cuts cost the government is like saying burglar alarms cost thieves. Therefore, any legislation that cuts taxes is a victory for liberty.
We should never allow concerns about government debt to prevent us from supporting tax cuts. Instead, we must focus on the real cause of the debt crisis — ever-increasing spending in a futile effort to run the world, run the economy, and run our lives. Increasing federal deficits will result in tax increases, either directly via Congress and the IRS or indirectly via the Federal Reserve’s inflation tax that results from the Fed’s monetization of federal debt.
Unless the federal government starts cutting spending and paying down the debt, America will experience an unprecedented economic crisis. Yet, neither Donald Trump nor Kamala Harris is even talking about this issue, much less proposing a serious plan to roll back the welfare-warfare state, reduce spending, and start to reduce the debt. Instead, both candidates are likely to increase spending. This is one reason it is difficult to take seriously the claim that this is the most important election in history.
This article first appeared at RonPaulInstitute.org.
Kamala’s Communist Death Cult
Kamala Harris is leading the United States down the road to nothing short of a repeat of Mao Zedong’s brutal Cultural Communist Revolution.
She is the candidate for a longstanding Marxist political machine that has finally emerged with its sights on total power.
A vote for Kamala Harris is a vote for a level of totalitarianism that is counter to everything that the United States represents.
Another City, Another Apartment Taken Over by Illegal Aliens
A 911 dispatch call out of Chicago, Illinois was uploaded to social media Monday Night where a case of Venezuelan illegal aliens taking over an apartment building was reported.
Infowars previously reported on a similar case of Venezuelan illegal aliens taking over an apartment complex in Aurora, Colorado in August where residents ‘were left to die‘. The aliens are reportedly using the commandeered apartment as a command base for theft rings.
BREAKING: A group of 32 armed Venezualans took over an apartment building in Chicago tonight. Here’s the audio of the 911 dispatch call.
— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) September 3, 2024
First they did this in Aurora, CO and now Chicago? Which city will be next?
This invasion happened on Kamala’s watch. pic.twitter.com/0L33y7PXto
In the call a dispatcher can be heard reporting 32 armed Venezuelans with motorcycles assembling in a courtyard of the apartment complex. Multiple 911 calls came in regarding the takeover.
“Winter is right around the corner. Did anyone honestly think these Venezuelan gangs who ruled the countries they came from, were going to be sleeping in tents in local parks while unarmed Chicago residents slept inside,” Patty McMurray said in The Gateway Pundit on Tuesday.
While Kamala Harris panders to blacks by trying to talk like them, real blacks are sounding the alarm about the alien takeover of their low-income communities.
Chicago resident warns ARMED Venezuelan gangs taking over apartment complex in their gun-free city…
— PattyMI (@PattyLovesTruth) September 3, 2024
“We got switches!” pic.twitter.com/RXyJRciPQz
The man can be heard saying that blacks in Chicago are armed and will defend their neighborhoods against the alien invasion.
Eric Weinstein: ‘I Don’t Know Whether Trump Will Be Allowed To Become President’
Eric Weinstein told Chris Williamson on the “Modern Wisdom” podcast that Donald Trump’s presidency has disrupted the old “rules-based international order,” which many view as an attempt to control global stability and wondered if the Republican nominee will “be allowed” to reenter the White House if elected in 2024. Weinstein argued that Trump’s unorthodox approach challenged the status quo, exposing flaws in the system and revealing that the impact of populist leaders on democracy and international agreements is more complex and significant than previously understood.
CHRIS WILLIAMSON: When we spoke at the start of the year, I said it was way too close to November to switch anybody out. Turns out that I was wrong.
ERIC WEINSTEIN: Beginner’s luck.
CHRIS WILLIAMSON: You said what are the odds that Joe Biden has a debilitating event between now and November including death, so he runs a one in 20 chance of dying in any given year or above that. I don’t think you know whether he’s even going to make it to November debilitating event could have been a debilitating public event
ERIC WEINSTEIN: I purposefully left it vague. I didn’t say the other part of it, which I now feel comfortable saying, which is…
CHRIS WILLIAMSON: What do you mean by that?
ERIC WEINSTEIN: I think there’s a remarkable story, and we’re in a funny game, which is: are we allowed to say what that story is? Because to say it, to analyze it, to name it, is to bring it into view. I think we don’t understand why the censorship is behaving the way it is. We don’t understand why it’s in the shadows or why our news is acting in a bizarre fashion. So let’s just set the stage, given that that was in February.
There is something that I think Mike Benz has just referred to as the rules-based international order. It’s an interlocking series of agreements, tacit understandings, explicit understandings, and clandestine understandings about how the most important structures keep the world free of war and keep markets open. There has been a system in place, whether understood explicitly or behind the scenes or implicitly, that says the purpose of the two American parties is to prune the field of populist candidates so that whatever two candidates exist in a faceoff are both acceptable to that world order.
From the point of view of, say, the State Department, the intelligence community, the defense department, and major corporations involved in international issues—from arms trade to, oh, I don’t know, food—they have a series of agreements that are fragile and could be overturned if a president entered the Oval Office who didn’t agree with them. And if the mood of the country was, “Why do we pay taxes into these structures? Why are we hamstrung? Why aren’t we a free people?” So what the two parties would do is run primaries with populist candidates and pre-commit the populist candidates to support the candidates who won the primaries. As long as that took place and you had two candidates that were both acceptable to the international order—that is, they aren’t going to rethink NAFTA or NATO or what have you—we called that democracy. And so democracy was the illusion of choice, what’s called magician’s choice, where the choice is not actually, you know, “pick a card, any card,” but somehow the magician makes sure that the card that you pick is the one that he knows.
In that situation, you have magician’s choice in the primaries, and then you’d have the duopoly field: two candidates, either of which was acceptable, and you could actually afford to hold an election. That way, the international order wasn’t put at risk every four years because you can’t have alliances that are subject to the whim of the people in plebiscites.
Under that structure, everything was going fine until 2016, when the first candidate ever to not hold any position in the military nor any position in government in the history of the Republic, Donald Trump, broke through the primary structure. Then there was a full court press: “Okay, we only have one candidate that’s acceptable to the international order. Donald Trump will be under constant pressure—he’s a loser, he’s a wild man, he’s an idiot, and he’s under control of the Russians.” And then he was going to be, you know, a 20-to-1 underdog, and then he wins. There was no precedent for this. They learned their lesson: you cannot afford to have candidates who are not acceptable to the international order and continue to have these alliances. This is an unsolved problem.
I don’t have a particular dog in this fight. I believe in democracy; I also believe in international agreements. And it is the job of the State Department, the intelligence community, and the defense department to bring this problem in front of the American people and say, “We have a problem. You don’t know everything that’s going on, and if you start voting in populist candidates, you’re going to end up knocking out load-bearing walls that you don’t understand.”