Clinton Adviser Says CNN’s ‘Objective Is To Take Trump Down’ At Debate
CNN is working to rig the upcoming debate against former President Donald Trump in favor of Joe Biden, according to longtime Clinton adviser Mark Penn.
Penn, a pollster and former campaign adviser for Bill Clinton, told Fox News that CNN debate moderators Jake Tapper and Dana Bash are keen to “take Trump down.”
“I think the moderators’ objective is probably to take Trump down. You can’t really be a CNN moderator and ‘let Trump off the hook,’” he said Tuesday.
Even a longtime Clinton adviser says CNN will stack the deck against President Trump: “I think the moderators’ objective is probably to take Trump down. You can’t really be a CNN moderator and ‘let Trump off the hook.’” pic.twitter.com/5EeYxzYgyM
— MAGA War Room (@MAGAIncWarRoom) June 25, 2024
“That’s kind of the problem with the setup of the debate,” he added, referring to CNN’s stringent rules and conditions that put Trump at a disadvantage that include muting the mics when the other candidate is speaking.
Questions surrounding the debate’s fairness emerged after CNN announced Tapper and Bash, who have a storied and well-documented history of anti-Trump biases, would be the moderators of the first presidential debate.
Dana Bash’s ex-husband Jeremy Bash was even one of the 51 former intelligence officials who falsely claimed Hunter Biden’s laptop was Russian disinformation days before the 2020 election.
Trump himself argued that he’ll be participating in a 3-vs-1 debate against Joe Biden himself as well as Tapper and Bash.
“You know, they offered me this debate, and they thought I wouldn’t take it because it’s on CNN. It’s Fake Tapper. They thought I wouldn’t accept because it’s on CNN, and Dana Bash is very tough on Trump,” he said earlier this month at a Turning Point Action convention.
?? TRUMP: THEY THOUGHT I WOULDN’T TAKE THIS DEBATE BECAUSE IT’S ON CNN
— Mario Nawfal (@MarioNawfal) June 7, 2024
“You know, they, uh, they offered me this debate, and they thought I wouldn’t take it because it’s on CNN. It’s Fake Tapper.
They thought I wouldn’t accept because it’s on CNN, and Dana Bash is very tough on… https://t.co/aJETJRPOB0 pic.twitter.com/1deSWKPRHP
CNN released a statement defending Tapper and Bash after CNN anchor Kasie Hunt abruptly ended an interview with Trump campaign press secretary Karoline Leavitt when she pointed out their past anti-Trump remarks.
Jake Tapper and Dana Bash are well respected veteran journalists who have covered politics for more than five decades combined. They have extensive experience moderating major political debates, including CNN’s Republican Presidential Primary Debate this cycle. There are no two people better equipped to co-moderate a substantial and fact-based discussion and we look forward to the debate on June 27 in Atlanta.
CNN then threatened social media channels with cease and desist takedown notices if they provide live commentary of the debate despite the presidential event falling under fair use protections.
Klaus Schwab Wants To Ban People Washing Their Pants More Than Once Per Month
Klaus Schwab’s World Economic Forum (WEF) has issued guidelines regarding how often the public should be allowed to wash their clothes, including underwear and gym clothes. The WEF has already ordered compliant governments to move […]
The post Klaus Schwab Wants To Ban People Washing Their Pants More Than Once Per Month appeared first on The People’s Voice.
Wash Clothes Less to Save Planet, World Economic Forum Urges
Humans need to stop washing their clothes in order to save the planet, the World Economic Forum globalist think tank is urging.
Claiming that decreasing the number of washes will reduce carbon emissions, the World Economic Forum released guidelines for the public to “wash our clothes less to help the planet.”
“70% of the CO2 emissions generated by a cotton t-shirt come from washing and drying it,” the WEF explained in their trademark informational video format.
World Economic Forum: “Scientists are urging us to wash our clothes less to help the planet.”
— Wide Awake Media (@wideawake_media) June 25, 2024
“70% of the CO2 emissions generated by a cotton t-shirt come from washing and drying it.”
“Jeans shouldn’t be washed more than once a month, jumpers once a fortnight, and pyjamas… pic.twitter.com/bNQ8z3d5yp
WEF noted the chemicals in laundry detergents pollute waterways, while also professing to care about the public’s clothing, pointing out that “too much washing also wears out clothes faster.”
The organization of unelected bureaucrats goes on to cite “experts” who’ve recommended against washing clothes “after every wear.”
Instead, WEF experts claim, “Jeans shouldn’t be washed more than once a month, jumpers once a fortnight, and pyjamas once a week.”
Thankfully, the “experts” say it’s okay for underwear and gym clothes to be washed after every use.
The recommendations for the public to wear dirty clothes are illustrative of the WEF’s attempts to micromanage every aspect of public life, from promoting bugs for human consumption to demanding we live in pods, all in the name of saving the planet.
“In the future we might all eat a lot more insects”.
— Wide Awake Media (@wideawake_media) November 20, 2023
The WEF touts “insect bread”—containing 70 crushed crickets in each loaf—as a solution to the “evils” of animal agriculture, which uses up far too much land feeding you pesky peasants.
“[Insects] require much less feed than… pic.twitter.com/32xG7I7maI
?? WEF
— Concerned Citizen (@BGatesIsaPyscho) November 21, 2023
From the people who brought you:-
‘You Will Own Nothing & Be Happy’
They are now going to start convincing you to house whoever in a garden pod.
They are coming for your cars, your land & your property – that’s what communists do badged you this time under Western… pic.twitter.com/6HLlpwrxU7
Alex Jones Joins Glenn Beck To Explain How Lawfare Is Being Used To Attack Free Speech
Infowars founder Alex Jones on Tuesday joined The Glenn Beck Program to share his experience being sued by the Sandy Hook families and the latest attempts to shut his outlet down for good.
Jones told Beck:
“The ‘families,’ who are represented by high-powered Democrat Party law firms, the same ones suing Elon Musk right now for defamation, different plaintiffs but the same lawyers, went on CNN last week and said, ‘We do not want money. We want the doors immediately closed.’ They don’t want to sell the millions of dollars of inventory, books, films, t-shirts, supplements, water filters, they don’t want anything. They want it immediately shut down and they said, ‘We want to stop his speech.’”
.@RealAlexJones tells me what his $1.5 billion legal judgement was really about: “The ‘families’ went on CNN last week and said, ‘we do not want money. We want [Infowars] immediately closed…because we want to stop his speech.'” pic.twitter.com/harH9T2nby
— Glenn Beck (@glennbeck) June 25, 2024
“The Alex Jones Show” host also explained the Travis County Sheriff’s Office could soon come to the Infowars studio and lock staff out of the building.
Concluding his time on air, Jones warned the lawfare used to destroy his Infowars empire will be used on other anti-establishment Americans next.
Also:
ZIRP-Addicted Japan Is Crumbling Under Higher Rates
The message is loud and clear: The Japanese economy has no tolerance for higher interest rates after the Bank of Japan has kept them artificially near zero for decades. Meanwhile, as the largest holders of US Treasury debt, Japan’s economic well-being has become inextricably dependent on the capricious whims of Federal Reserve monetary policy — and both of those chickens have now come home to roost.
Exhibit A: Japan’s 100-year-old Norinchukin bank, which holds a whopping 20% of the total outstanding foreign bonds held by Japanese financial institutions. It just announced it would sell $63 billion in low-yielding US and European bonds at a loss, catapulting Norinchukin’s total annual losses to ¥1.5 trillion, or around 9.5 billion dollars.
This follows a prediction just about a month ago that the bank’s losses would be ⅓ as much — and those losses still have room to grow if foreign bond markets don’t rally in the coming months. The losses exceed the bank’s previous record, set in 2009 during the financial crisis, by about 1 trillion yen, and bonds compose more than half of Norinchukin’s portfolio.
Norinchukin (“Nochu”) is Japan’s “farmer” bank: it holds around $600 billion in deposits from Japan’s agricultural and fishing collectives. Most of the pensions of Japan’s lowest-income workers are stored here.
— zerohedge (@zerohedge) June 19, 2024
Until recently, Nochu was best known as the CLO whale: it had… pic.twitter.com/TzanqrtXK9
Despite the BoJ’s April rate hike being minuscule, the domestic banking industry immediately began to sputter. The BoJ is broadly expected to announce another rate hike this year. But with Japanese banks already quivering under the weight of a mere 0.1% interest, and plenty of central bank “surprises” always possible, it’s hard to say for sure what the BoJ will attempt in the meantime to save its troubled economy. It has little hope of undoing the trap it set for itself from decades of zero percent interest rate policy and overdependence on US Treasuries.
The yen is now closing at 1990-era levels, remaining battered despite a $60 billion-plus BoJ intervention last May to prop it up, during which the BoJ cited “excessive speculative volatility” as the reason. As of this writing, the yen is right back where it was before the BoJ stepped in last May:
USD vs JPY 6-Month
The announcement follows a series of flashing warning signs for smaller and regional banks in the US, like the 2023 failure of Silicon Valley Bank, and the collapse of First Regional Bank earlier this year. It lays bare the absurdity of an entire financial industry — and economy — hinging on the monetary policy announcements of a handful of individuals.
As the main bank for Japanese agricultural, fishing, and forestry cooperatives, a Norinchukin implosion would directly impact those industries. But it could likely set into motion a cascade of meltdowns at other financial institutions. Norinchukin didn’t bother to hedge its assumption that interest rates would soon become more accommodative, putting all its chips on “black” that European and US sovereign bonds would remain a practically “risk-free” investment thanks to central bank tinkering.
The European Central Bank cut rates earlier this month, but for entities like Norinchukin with overexposure to foreign bonds, it’s too little too late. That’s especially true as the Fed, shocked by inflation it thought was “transitory,” continues signaling that it might lower interest rates only once this year.
If the Fed doesn’t cut, more US banks will fail. If it does cut, inflation will rocket upward. Loan-dependent sectors can’t handle even modestly higher rates, and the US dollar can’t handle a low cost of borrowing or other stimulative interventions without tanking in purchasing power and crushing consumers and manufacturers alike.
As in 2008, the meltdown will be global — the real question is whether the first big domino will fall in the US, Japan, or elsewhere. As Norinchukin scrambles to raise capital, Finance Minister Shunichi Suzuki emerged to reassure markets, laughably, that the bank is financially sound.
However, some of us still remember how S&P slapped an “A” credit rating on Lehman Brothers just days before it imploded and helped set into motion a global financial crisis.
The 2008 crisis helped solidify certain firms as being in the privileged “too big to fail” club — an official admission that if you’re a megabank, you can privatize your profits and socialize your losses. It triggered an epic global monetary intervention with ripple effects that linger to this day. And with the wizards of high finance no wiser, and the system itself no less self-interested after the fallout of that episode, the next crash will be even larger — and central banks will be powerless to stop it.
MUST WATCH: Dr. David Martin Interview — U.S. Gov. Is Coordinating A Depopulation Program Against The World
Are There Vaccines in our Food Supply?
In my previous articles, we looked at the global war on farmers, the organizations pushing for the Great Food Reset, the tactics used to foist these changes on the public, and the projects underway to remove your access to healthy, farm-fresh foods. Today we will delve into the contentious issue of vaccines in the food supply.
Accurate information on this topic is not easy to find. The USDA and drug developers aren’t required to release any information on veterinary drugs in the development pipeline, so independent detectives are left searching through peer-reviewed papers, university publications, USDA contracts, grant notifications, company white papers, and university websites to learn what is on the horizon. This system is far from transparent, and frankly, I don’t think that’s an accident.
Before any vaccine technology is used on humans, it is usually tried in the veterinary market first due to the incredibly lax regulations. Knowing this, it should come as no surprise that our food animals had been receiving mRNA injections for years before the Covid vaccine rollout.
Around 2014, the USDA granted a conditional license for an mRNA vaccine for use in pigs for Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus. This is equivalent to emergency use authorization and gets around the USDA’s vaccine licensing and authorization process.
In 2015, Merck bought Harrisvaccines to acquire their RNA platform. Merck’s 2015 press release stated that this “RNA Particle technology…represents a breakthrough in vaccine development. It also has a highly versatile production platform able to target a wide range of viruses and bacteria. Pathogens are collected from a farm, and specific genes are sequenced and inserted into RNA particles, making safe, potent vaccines able to provide herd-specific protection.”
Introduced in 2018, Sequivity is Merck’s RNA vaccine platform built on the Harrisvaccines technology. These RNA injections are already in use in pigs. They are customized for different viruses, and each customized injection undergoes no new safety testing; new formulations are deployed immediately. Pork you are eating from the supermarket is already likely treated with these gene therapies.
In 2016, BioNtech and Bayer partnered to develop veterinary mRNA vaccines using Bayer’s veterinary knowledge and the BioNtech MRNA platform (the one used for the Pfizer Covid shot). Given the intervening years for development, there may be a host of new mRNA livestock shots released in the near future.
In October 2021, Iowa State University began a project testing a novel mRNA vaccine against RSV infections in cows, in the form of a subcutaneous implant that continuously releases mRNA into the cow. The anticipated completion date for the study is 2026.
If you think mRNA vaccines are the only problem, think again: according to a 2021 paper published in Frontiers in Veterinary Science, DNA, RNA, and recombinant viral-vector vaccines are all in development. They are touted as capable of quick deployment: no time for pesky safety testing, let alone time to see if humans who consume meat from these animals suffer any long-term health effects. The paper also points out that farmed salmon are already receiving multiple DNA injections for various diseases.
According to Merck’s Veterinary Manual, experimental DNA vaccines have been produced against avian influenza, rabies, bovine viral diarrhea virus, porcine herpesvirus, bovine herpesvirus-1, foot-and-mouth disease, and other veterinary viruses.
All this begs the question: can DNA vaccines change the genetic code of an animal or human? According to a 2017 Moderna white paper titled mRNA Vaccines: Disruptive Innovation in Vaccination, “The key challenge associated with DNA vaccines is that they must penetrate the cell nucleus…Once inside the nucleus, DNA vaccines have a risk of permanently changing a person’s DNA.”
Can genetic injections given to animals affect the person who consumes the animal product? Chinese scientists have published a study wherein mRNA-laced milk was injected into the intestines of mice. The mRNA was successfully absorbed through the digestive tract and became active in their bodies. The researchers plan to follow up with a version where the mice are fed the mRNA rather than being injected, and in their paper’s conclusion, they opine that “In the near future, an mRNA delivery system based on milk-derived exosomes will serve as a platform for mRNA therapeutics development.”
We know that human breast milk was contaminated with mRNA lipid nanoparticles after Covid-19 injections. This raises concerns with the Iowa State project developing a continuous release, RNA implant for cows. How are we confident it would not cross into the milk supply?
Beyond the vaccines for animals lies the frontier of vegetables genetically engineered to deliver mRNA into any human who eats them. The National Science Foundation is funding one of several studies using plants such as lettuce and spinach to generate mRNA gene therapies that enter the human body when the plant is eaten. Plant-based immunization experimentation began more than two decades ago: In 2002, a company called Prodigene was fined millions of dollars when their vaccine-producing GMO corn contaminated 500,000 pounds of soybeans.
RNAi pesticides also present a significant risk to human health. These sprays, used on GMO crops, are designed to genetically modify living organisms in an agricultural setting. RNAi sprays can blow freely in the wind, contaminating vast swaths of fertile farmland and otherwise clean crops, potentially causing genetic modifications to many species beyond their intended target, and even altering organic vegetables grown downwind. In 2017, the EPA approved Monsanto and Dow’s RNAi Smartstax PRO corn, which now accounts for up to 17 percent of the corn grown in the United States, so the corn you are eating in tortilla chips and other processed foods may well contain this gene-silencing technology.
Regarding the potential danger of genetic damage to humans and animal species from RNAi sprays, a report by Jonathan R. Latham and Allison K. Wilson of the Bioscience Research Project notes that “Mammalian digestion is a complex process in which food molecules are taken into the body by many routes. It has been demonstrated in mammals that some of these pathways allow limited entry into the bloodstream of macromolecules such as DNA and intact proteins. Thus absorbed, macromolecules may enter internal organs, muscle tissue, and even embryos. At least in some tissues, foreign DNA enters the nuclei of individual cells.” The authors also note that “long duplexed dsRNAs have previously been discarded as medical therapies for the reason that they induce side effects at low doses. Based on our analysis it seems unlikely that a convincing case can be made for their safe inclusion in food.”
In the Livestock Research Innovation Corporation’s 2021 white paper called “The Future of Livestock Vaccines,” the authors enthusiastically opine that: “The current COVID-19 pandemic has taught us many lessons, including the fact that the development, mass production and approval process of vaccines could be shortened from several years (or decades) to 8-9 months. This will have a significant and long-lasting impact on how livestock vaccines are produced and deployed in the future.”
They remind us that “Good health starts with biosecurity” and that “resulting from the pandemic, society is more attuned to the One Health concept and so vaccination of livestock will be seen as part of a larger health picture, one that includes humans and the environment.”
MUST WATCH: Dr. David Martin Interview — U.S. Gov. Is Coordinating A Depopulation Program Against The World