Ancient Political Advice for Today’s Rulers
It is probably the case that politicians who are encouraged to read the works of the ancient Greek thinker, Plato – particularly The Republic – to learn something there about the prerequisites for being able to govern appropriately and wisely, would scoff at this suggestion, with perhaps a few rare exceptions. More specifically, among these prerequisites Plato counted an understanding of the ‘nature’ of human beings – their ‘soul’ or psuche (where our word, psyche, comes from). To the question of why Plato would consider it essential for rulers to understand the people whom they govern, the answer should be obvious: unless you have a grasp of how these creatures think, what they desire, and so on, your governance may just flounder against the rock of misunderstanding.
At least this is something on which our current ‘rulers’ (such as they are) would agree: you have to ‘understand’ the people over whom you rule, but with an important – in fact, crucial – qualification. For Plato, knowledge of human nature was essential because, as a philosopher, he wanted rulers to rule wisely, for the benefit of the people and for the polis or city-state; for those fascists who would lord it over us today, such knowledge is similarly essential, although it comes with a massive difference. Instead of utilising an understanding of humans for the benefit of all, their intent, to use and abuse such knowledge with the aim of exercising totalitarian control over the supposed ‘useless eaters,’ has been demonstrated in no uncertain terms since at least 2020, although the aftermath of 9/11 was already a warning of what was to come.
So, how should one govern, given specific abilities, inclinations, and dispositions on the part of the governed and the governing – considering that rulers also have to understand themselves to be able to govern well and justly? If you recognise the name of Plato, you will probably know that he was an ancient Greek philosopher who lived in the 4th century BCE. You may also know that Socrates was his teacher and that he (Plato), in turn, was Aristotle’s teacher, who later turned out to be the teacher of the Macedonian prince who became Alexander the Great. This is the historical context in broad brushstrokes. What few people know is that Plato could teach politicians a thing or two about good governance.
Politicians would probably scoff at this — a fellow who lived more than 2,000 years ago teach us ‘modern’ politicians how to do our job? Come on! Actually, this is precisely what I mean. Consider this. Plato’s Republic did not fall from thin air. When his teacher, Socrates, was found guilty of misleading the youth of the city (that is, for teaching them how to think for themselves) by an Athenian court, he was condemned to death. For Plato this was a clear sign that justice did not prevail in Athens.
Who knew better than Plato that Socrates was a just man, whose only ‘crime’ was that he taught people to question things, especially ‘the gods of the city’ — in other words, all those things that cities (today, societies) accept conventionally and uncritically. For individuals who have political and economic power in a city or society, such a person as Socrates was a direct threat to their power, and therefore he ‘had to go.’
In his Apology Plato provides an account of Socrates’ trial, which gives us some insight into his reasons for believing that Socrates was a just man, and hence, that his conviction and execution comprised an unjust act. But in his Republic — which is undoubtedly one of the most important and influential works ever written — Plato has furnished us with a thoroughly reasoned account of the conditions that a city-state (or polis, in Greek), must satisfy to be a ‘just’ city.
If Plato’s notion of justice comes across as strange today, it is probably because one does not often judge laws in light of the question, whether they are just; that is, serve justice. And yet, it has always been the case that laws are not necessarily just. (Think of South Africa’s erstwhile apartheid laws: they were not just.) However, the comparative novelty of Plato’s notion of a ‘just’ city, from a contemporary perspective, only comes into focus when one discovers that you first have to understand his conception of the human psyche or soul. In a nutshell, the structure of a just city is congruent to that of what may be called a ‘just’ soul.
According to Plato the human psyche is composite, with three components, namely reason, spirit, and appetite (or desire). By means of striking images, functioning as metaphors, he enabled his readers to visualise their relation to one another. The best known of these images is probably the one in the Phaedrus, where he compares the psyche to a chariot, driven by a charioteer and pulled by two horses. The first of the latter was a grey-eyed, black horse, stockily built and not really beautiful, but extraordinarily strong, and disobedient to boot. The other horse was black-eyed, white, beautiful, graceful, and obedient.
What do these metaphorical components of the soul – the chariot, two horses and charioteer – represent? The charioteer instantiates reason, the white horse spirit, and the black horse desire (appetite). Reason guides, spirit animates, and desire motivates. The strength of desire, in Plato’s estimation, is apparent from his argument that, unless the charioteer (reason) enlists the assistance of the white, obedient horse (spirit), the powerful black horse (desire) cannot be controlled, and pulls the chariot wherever it wants to go.
In other words, the partnership between the charioteer and the obedient, but spirited horse is essential to prevent the headstrong horse from taking them from pillar to post in the quest, to satisfy its needs. However, if the charioteer (reason), assisted by the white horse, gains mastery over this powerful creature, he or she can guide the two steeds, which means that reason is not self-sufficient, but depends on the two other faculties (spirit and desire) to live a life in equilibrium. Putting it differently: only wisdom (reason’s ‘excellence’ or virtue) together with courage (spirit’s ‘excellence’) can rein in the excesses of appetite or desire (whose ‘excellence’ is to motivate).
What should be prevented at all costs, according to Plato, is that desire be allowed to rule the former two faculties, as disharmony or chaos would be the result in a person’s life. Significantly, such an appetite- or need-ruled person’s soul is said to lack ‘justice.’ The ‘just’ soul is therefore also a happy one; where there is balance among reason, spirit, and desire, all three of these faculties being necessary for a fulfilled life.
Interestingly, Plato argues that when spirit, which is characterised by ‘spiritedness’ or thumos, is lacking in a person, it has a particularly deleterious effect on such a person’s character, given its indispensable supportive function in relation to reason. Moreover, one knows that spirit is absent from a person’s character when someone fails to be angered by injustice. This gives meaning to the expression, ‘to be justly angry.’
This is where one can make the transition from a ‘just’ (and happy) individual soul to the state which is ‘just.’ In the Republic, Plato maps his psychology on to the state or polis. There are, or should be, three distinct classes, he argues: the rulers, guardians of the state (or so-called philosopher-kings), the protectors (soldiers and navy, also sometimes called ‘guardians’), and the producers (commercial classes).
Furthermore, just as an individual lives happily and in harmony with her- or himself when reason rules over desire with the help of spirit, so, too, a polis (or society) is harmonious and ‘just’ when the rulers govern wisely, with the assistance of the spirited protectors, in this way restraining the sometimes excessive needs and desires of the commercial classes. Should appetite (the ‘excellence’ of the commercial producers) gain the upper hand, a city is soon in disharmony, according to Plato, particularly if reason (the rulers) is overwhelmed by the wish to satisfy appetite uncontrollably, and especially if the protectors fail to support the (presumably wise) rulers.
Although one may take issue with Plato on the class structure of his ideal republic, which is thoroughly argued in the book (and I, for one, would do so), one has to acknowledge the genius of his insight into the prerequisites for ruling well; namely a well-grounded comprehension of the way the human soul functions — that of the rulers and the ruled. Furthermore, his model of the human psyche is as illuminating today as it was in antiquity, and it is easy to test it on an individual as well as collective level.
Freud understood this so well that at least two of the components of his structural conception of the psyche correspond with Plato’s; namely the ‘ego’ (reason, for Plato) and the ‘id’ (Platonic desire). The only two that aren’t really a match are Freud’s ‘superego’ (the subliminal representative of societal normativity in the psyche) and Plato’s ‘spirit,’ probably because the ‘superego’ presupposes the Freudian unconscious, of which Plato presumably did not have an idea.
Recall that earlier I alluded to contemporary politicians and other technocrats, who aspire to the assumption of power over the rest of us, employing an understanding of the human psyche, not for the benefit of all – as in Plato’s (and later also Aristotle’s) case – but instead with the demonstrable intention, to use and abuse such knowledge, with the additional aim of furthering desired totalitarian control. What I have in mind is that, as evidence suggests, the kind of knowledge (pertaining to ‘rule’) that they aspire to is mainly, if not exclusively, of the psycho-technological sort, which enables them – that is, their agents and servants – to carry out what is known today as (a variety of) ‘psy-ops,’ or psychological operations usually attributed to the military.
Psy-ops employ a diversity of psychological strategies and techniques to exercise influence over the feelings, thoughts, and behaviour of a selected group, with the obvious goal of persuading the people comprising the latter, usually via various modes of deception, to act in a desired manner. If this sounds familiar, don’t be surprised. It has been carried out on the populations of the world’s countries since at least 2020, and arguably for much longer.
Given the advanced state of electronic information and communication technology at that time, the means for the propaganda and cleverly disguised disinformation, essential for convincing people to act in a desired manner, were already there with the advent of Covid, and will be employed again in a similar future situation, such as the possibly pervasive spread of bird flu (among people?), which has already been detected in India and at least 17 US states.
It is not difficult to recall obvious instances of psy-ops during Covid. Who can forget the endless refrain of ‘Build back better,’ or ‘It is time for the Great Reset,’ let alone ‘No one is safe until we are all safe!’ And then there were the psy-ops surrounding lockdowns, masking, and social distancing, where we were all assured that, based on scientific grounds, these strategies for combating ‘the virus’ were indispensable if we were to defeat it. However, as Robert Kennedy, Jr. reminds us in his A Letter to Liberals (p. 32), in an April 2022 interview,
…Dr. Fauci finally acknowledged his true strategy behind lockdown mandates—a psychological warfare technique to coerce vaccine compliance: ‘You use lockdowns to get people vaccinated.’
Not surprisingly, Fauci has also admitted that social distancing ‘…was completely fake from the start,’ in other words, that it was a psy-op, as indeed were ‘…draconian rules around vaccines that don’t meaningfully stop transmission or infection’ (in the same article) – a reference to putatively scientifically founded ‘vaccine’ mandates. Unfortunately, this rather debonair admission from an unrepentant Covid ‘health’ czar does not reverse the immeasurable damage done to so many people by the adoption of these completely unscientific measures, especially to children, in psychological terms.
Not that these psy-ops were restricted to people like Fauci and Bill Gates as far as their indefatigable praise of miraculous ‘vaccines’ and related matters went. Joe Biden, the president of the United States himself – in the company of dictators like Justin Trudeau of Canada and Jacinda Ardern of New Zealand, who did the same thing – endlessly reminded people on television that it was imperative to get the ‘vaccine,’ lest they die a miserable death, which he confidently predicted on the part of the ‘anti-vaxxers.’
And without fail they supported their exhortations with the reassurance to viewers that this was based on ‘the science.’ Some ‘science,’ given the accumulating evidence of excess deaths, occurring in the time following the administering of billions of Covid ‘vaccines’ across the globe – something that is becoming apparent regarding children too. Only a fool would argue that there is no connection between the jabs and the mortality figures.
Is there any indication that knowledge – specifically scientific knowledge, so highly prized in our time – is employed or applied to facilitate good governance or rule today, in a way that is comparable to Plato’s use of philosophical knowledge to promote good governance? It seems to me to be abundantly obvious that this is not the case; whether it is techno-psychology, or pharmaceutical science, the exact opposite appears to be so, and while one may argue that this is not explicitly tied to issues concerning rule or governance, in effect it has everything to do with it. Except that it should be called ‘misrule,’ ‘tyranny,’ or ‘dictatorship.’ And as for being ‘just,’ it is at the furthest possible remove from it.
EMERGENCY FINANCIAL NEWS: Economist Warns The Collapse Has Already Begun – Will Be Worse Than The Great Depression
China Says US Is ‘The Biggest Threat To Space Security’
The Chinese Foreign Ministry has claimed that the US poses the greatest threat to security in space and accused them of being the main instigator of space militarization. “The United States is a powerful driving […]
The post China Says US Is ‘The Biggest Threat To Space Security’ appeared first on The People’s Voice.
Driver Makes Wrong Turn At Portland State, Has Car Destroyed By Leftist Protesters – Video
A driver making his way through the Portland State University campus came upon a crowd of demonstrators and had his vehicle attacked before exiting the car and being chased down by the angry mob of left-wing protesters.
A driver made a wrong turn into the mob of far-left protesters at Portland State University. So they hospitalized him and smashed his car. They’re now claiming it was no accident and that he was there to run them over. pic.twitter.com/xRU7tuqkgA
— Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) May 3, 2024
The incident took place on Thursday when the car approached a blocked roadway, resulting in a demonstrator trying to open the driver’s door.
The driver, however, was equipped with mace and sprayed the protester.
Next, another protester broke the back windshield of the vehicle and caused the driver to briefly hit the gas.
The driver quickly pressed the brakes well away from the crowd in front of the car, put it in park and went running out of the vehicle.
Carrying the mace, the man who was driving ran past demonstrators and sprayed ones who tried hitting him.
According to the Portland Police Bureau, the driver was detained and taken to a nearby hospital for “mental health evaluations.”
After sprinting away in hopes of getting out of the situation safely, the young man’s car was totally destroyed by the leftist protesters who spray-painted “intifada” on the side and smashed the vehicle to pieces.
There’s not much left of the car. It’s fairly new so it’s unlikely he did that on purpose. What would be the point of running out of the car had he meant to harm them? pic.twitter.com/ASCPlL9o6P
— Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) May 3, 2024
“Wow, this is messed up,” wrote Elon Musk on X.
Wow, this is messed up
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) May 3, 2024
WATCH: Mexican Authorities Battle Migrants on Train at US Border
Mexican immigration officials tried to force migrants off a cargo train arriving in a city along the U.S. border during a wild scene caught on camera, according to reports.
On Friday, Mexican journalist Pedro Ultreras published footage on social media purportedly showing authorities trying to eject a group of migrants from the top of train car near Piedras Negras, Coahuila, located directly across from Eagle Pass, Texas.
Agentes del Instituto Mexicano de inmigración tratan de bajar a decenas de migrantes a la fuerza, del tren que llaman “La Bestia”. En el video se aprecian a una uniformada dándole bastonazos a un migrante. El Tren está parado cerca de Piedras Negras frontera con Eagle Pass, TX. pic.twitter.com/UGs7Cpjt5N
— Pedro Ultreras (@pedroultreras) May 3, 2024
“Agents from the Mexican Immigration Institute [INM] try to force dozens of migrants off the train they call ‘The Beast,’” Ultreras explained in a post on social media.
“In the video you can see a uniformed woman caning a migrant. The train is stopped near Piedras Negras border with Eagle Pass, TX.”
It is unclear what transpired before or after the incident, but it aligns with other reports indicating Mexican authorities are continuing a relative crackdown on illegal migration that kicked off around the beginning of 2024.
A female migrant recently complained to border reporter Auden Cabello that Mexico has been the most difficult country for her to traverse during her journey to the U.S.
Under the Lopez Obrador migrant crackdown on behalf of Biden, this is what migrants are saying.
“Why is Mexico the only country that won’t let us advance? Every other country helps us.”
“I’ve been in Mexico a month and a half. It’s the country where it’s hardest to travel. The… pic.twitter.com/921C0zJu7i— Auden B. Cabello (@CabelloAuden) May 3, 2024
“Why is Mexico the only country that won’t let us advance? Every other country helps us,” the woman said.
“We’re not moving until Mexican Immigration guarantees they won’t bother us or they help us advance to the border.”
Cabello asserts that what some are calling the “Authentic Border Wall” — Mexican enforcement — is actually working, to a degree.
“Mexican Immigration still has operations in states like Zacatecas, Durango, Coahuila and Chihuahua trying to stop or slow down the migrant flow on freight trains,” Cabello says.
THE AUTHENTIC BORDER WALL
— Border Hawk (@BorderHawkNews) March 13, 2024
The Mexican military cracked down on mass illegal crossings into Texas starting in January, proving that they play one of the most important roles in stopping the invasion of the US
But why were they previously allowing – and even helping – thousands… pic.twitter.com/UAYTmBhseO
Chaos unfolds constantly along the U.S.-Mexico border, as Infowars regularly reports.
Aleksandr Dugin, Alex Jones, and Tucker Carlson Expose the Secrets of the Transhumanist Death Cult
‘Immigrants, Not Americans, Are What Makes Us Strong’ Says Joe Biden
Migrants – not voting Americans and their children – “are what makes us economically strong,” according to President Joe Biden. Biden made the comments during a fundraiser for pro-migration groups at the elite Mayflower Hotel […]
The post ‘Immigrants, Not Americans, Are What Makes Us Strong’ Says Joe Biden appeared first on The People’s Voice.
Texas AG Vows to Block Austin from Defying Law Prohibiting ‘Gender Transition’ Treatments
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton pushed back against the Austin, Texas, city council after members passed a resolution seeking to defy the state’s ban on transgender treatments.
On Thursday, Paxton told the city council they must comply with SB 14’s prohibition of puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and invasive surgeries for children, or potentially face legal consequences.
“The resolution is no more than an empty political statement,” Paxton wrote in a press release.
If the City of Austin refuses to follow the law and protect children, my office will consider every possible response to ensure compliance. Texas municipalities do not have the authority to pick and choose which state laws they will or will not abide by. The people of Texas have… https://t.co/cvjrXo74ia
— Attorney General Ken Paxton (@KenPaxtonTX) May 2, 2024
“Each clause directing the City Manager to defy SB 14 is prefaced with the nonsensical qualification, ‘except to the extent required by law.’ In other words, the Austin City Council would order the City Manager and city employees to follow the law while pretending to say the exact opposite.”
“If the City of Austin refuses to follow the law and protect children, my office will consider every possible response to ensure compliance,” Paxton stated.
“Texas municipalities do not have the authority to pick and choose which state laws they will or will not abide by. The people of Texas have spoken, and Austin City Council must listen.”
Paxton’s warning comes as the Austin City Council on Thursday passed a “Transgender Protection Resolution,” ordering the city manager and city staff to defy SB14 signed into law by Gov. Greg Abbott (R) in June 2023.