“Salaam Alaikum” – UK Cops Film Hostage-Style Videos Vowing To Protect Muslim Citizens, Denying “Two-Tier” Policing
Police around the UK are issuing messages to citizens, specifically the Muslim community, letting them know they’ll be protected from the “far-right” demonstrators allegedly terrorizing the nation.
“Salaam Alaikum,” the West Midlands Police Chief greeted locals. “Thank you to the leaders and elders who have afforded me this opportunity to speak to you personally.”
He continued, claiming there is “no two-tier” policing in the UK and that his staff police “without favor.”
Thought 2 Tier Policing couldn’t get any worse?
— Tommy Robinson ?? (@TRobinsonNewEra) August 7, 2024
Chief of police West Midlands, he starts his conversion, with; Salam Alaikum, not good morning.
Then he goes on to complain about “far right”, then states we are 1 Tier Policing.
It’s all there @elonmusk pic.twitter.com/FnX813Uvuy
The police chief said his officers “don’t tolerate racism and discrimination” before telling citizens that if “extreme right-wing” groups protest they should let the cops deal with them instead of fighting in the streets.
He ended the message by thanking elders at local mosques for giving him “support, information and guidance” about the recent demonstrations against mass migration, and parting with “shukran.”
While claiming to practice “one-tier” policing, the chief never mentioned the vandalism and violence committed by Muslim gangs in recent weeks.
In a second video, Superintendent of Greater Manchester Police in Oldham Phil Hutchinson also opened with “Salaam alaikum,” and thanked local Muslim leaders for holding a meeting.
Several Muslim men stood behind Hutchinson as he told the camera police are “engaging with all communities” and will “continue to deal with perpetrators.”
Another one.
— Tommy Robinson ?? (@TRobinsonNewEra) August 7, 2024
No two tier policing?
Literally looks like a hostage video.#TwoTierKeir
Check this @elonmusk https://t.co/jHZ3utG7cz pic.twitter.com/i6lmRYlu3D
Met Police chief Sir Mark Rowley also tried pushing back against the complaint from Brits of “two-tier” policing where Muslims and migrants are allowed to commit crimes while conservative citizens are targeted and prosecuted with the maximum penalty possible.
Rowley also said UK police would go after people “stirring up” hatred online and publishing material deemed to “provoke violence on the streets.”
TWO-TIER POLICING@metpoliceuk will ‘throw the full force of the law’ at me.
— Tommy Robinson ?? (@TRobinsonNewEra) August 7, 2024
It’s very clear what they intend to do to me.
They are attacking @elonmusk as well, because they want to clamp down on citizen journalism, they MUST have total control of any narrative.
X is a… pic.twitter.com/2wC6gJPkW9
Many British people pointed out the government fast-tracking the sentencing of rioters deemed “far-right” while failing to charge foreigners caught on film violently attacking police as another example of two-tier justice.
Three individuals were jailed for participating in a riot in Southport the day after three young girls were stabbed to death by a man originally thought to be a migrant.
The men had their sentencing fast-tracked by the court where 58-year-old Derek Drummond was given a three-year sentence, Declan Geiran received 30 months, and Liam James Riley was ordered to serve 20 months.
Drummond admitted to punching a police officer in the face, Geiran admitted to arson of a police vehicle, and Riley pleaded guilty to violent disorder.
People blasted UK Prime Minister “Two-Tier Keir” Starmer for quickly jailing locals upset by the murder of children while failing to charge a group who recently assaulted Manchester Police on film.
A female officer had her nose broken when a pair of men launched a barrage of punches at two cops inside the Manchester Airport last month.
??? Two Tier Policing Britain ‼️
— Concerned Citizen (@BGatesIsaPyscho) August 6, 2024
This happened just over a week ago – where a female on duty Police Officer had her nose broken at Manchester Airport.
The ‘Suspects’ still HAVE NOT been charged with an offence.
What kind of message does this send?
Ask any Politician that… pic.twitter.com/sNge8n1xpU
I hear two-tier Keir has ordered 24hr courts to fast-track cases of violent disorder on our streets.
— Lee Harris (@addicted2newz) August 4, 2024
Meanwhile, these two violent thugs who attacked the police at Manchester Airport are not in prison yet.pic.twitter.com/0jwBkDY84f pic.twitter.com/Z7KSw8PLh0
Good. Now provide consequences for the vicious assaults on police at Manchester Airport. https://t.co/v8mAw5GUDK
— Patrick O’Flynn (@oflynnsocial) August 7, 2024
Instead of playing the video showing the beginning of the confrontation, many outlets and social media pages are only showing footage where an out-of-control officer stomped on one of the suspect’s head while he was already on the ground.
This officer is a HERO and should be awarded for his actions not punished.
— Ashlea Simon (@AshleaSimonBF) July 27, 2024
Do you agree?
Manchester Airport police deserve the support of the people on this matter.https://t.co/A1JnzGBLNv
The UK government is clear they will not be supporting or protecting citizens who speak out against the invasion of their country, and will instead attack and jail them for daring to stand up to the UN Replacement Migration agenda.
Elon Musk Calls Kamala Harris a Communist
Elon Musk weighed in on the topic of Democrat front runner Kamala ‘Kamabla’ Harris’s true economic philosophy by saying that the cackling Indian (now black) woman believes in the theory of communism.
“Kamala is quite literally a communist,” Musk said in a social media post Wednesday. “She wants not merely equal opportunity, but equal outcomes.”
Communism is a failed economic theory and financial system which eschews private property ownership in favor of state-owned industry in the name of ‘enriching’ the people via removing their wealth.
Kamala is quite literally a communist.
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) August 7, 2024
She wants not merely equal opportunity, but equal outcomes. https://t.co/XIS8HSbLbC
Musk’s statements were in response to another social media account discussing terminology favored by Harris, such as ‘equitable distribution’ and ‘equity’, which she used in a video compilation embedded in the post.
Redistribution of wealth from the haves to the have-nots has been a key tenet of communism for over 100 years.
Harris seemed to be rewording statements by famous communist figures throughout history, such as Karl Marx, according to at least one social media user.
While communism has been ridiculed by its detractors for its forced austerity and efficient genocide, those like Harris do not admit to being communist. Instead, the American Left parrot the same ideals but with a much more loving, liberal word choice.
Interestingly, the unpopular Democrat Vice President does not to seem to inspire confidence in her economic goals, as the majority of voters believe she will be the same or worse than the ill-fated Joe Biden has been on the economy.
Her response to Bidenomics is Kamalnomics, a system that is not well understood, including by its namesake herself.
The Manchester Attack – Rick Munn Interviews Iain Davis
On Rick Munn’s outstanding Locked and Loaded on TNT Radio I was given an opportunity to discuss my latest book – The Manchester Attack: An Independent Investigation. Many thanks to Rick Munn for having the guts to discuss that the alleged Manchester Arena bombing was evidently a hoaxed false flag. So many in the UK’s so-called independent media are clearly afraid of doing so.
Listen to the full episode here
– buy the Paperback –
Order Directly from Iain Davis (£15.49 – inc. p&p)
Please Note: you will be directed to PayPal. It is important that PayPal has your correct delivery address in order for you to receive your book.
Please rest assured your data is handled with strict confidentiality and data handling is compliant with GDPR.
Please see Terms and Conditions
Other Available Copies
Buy The Manchester Attack paperback from Amazon for £19.99
Buy The Manchester Attack Ebook from Amazon for £4.99
Please don’t forget, the pdf version is FREE to Iain Davis subscribers.
The post The Manchester Attack – Rick Munn Interviews Iain Davis appeared first on Iain Davis.
Brussels Approves €4.2 Billion to Ukraine in First Installment of €50 Billion Aid Package
European Union governments on Tuesday approved the first regular payment to Ukraine of €4.2 billion of the €50 billion the EU has set aside for financial assistance to Kyiv, the EU Council confirmed.
The money will be given to Ukraine in the form of grants and loans once the conditions for disbursement have been met.
These included reforms in public finance management, management of state-owned enterprises, the business environment, energy, and de-mining.
The €50 billion fund for 2024-2027 was agreed by EU governments in March. Ukraine has so far received €6 billion in bridge financing and €1.9 billion in pre-financing.
Even with the latest batch of EU aid to Ukraine, there is no indication yet as to which countries would be willing to contribute to funding Ukraine’s eventual reconstruction, the cost of which is estimated at a minimum of €1 trillion, with some saying the amount could easily be twice as high.
Live Now! Globalists Could Launch Market Crash, WWIII, Cyber Attacks & More Pandemics As 2024 Election Looms
“The American Journal” is live every weekday from 8-11 am CST.
Follow The American Journal on Telegram:
Pharma, WHO Team up to Create Permanent ‘Pandemic’ Market for Mandated, Experimental Vaccines
Big Pharma and its key investors are rolling out a new strategy — “the full takeover of the public sector, specifically the World Health Organization (WHO), and the regulatory system that now holds the entire market hostage” — according to a new investigative report by Unlimited Hangout’s Max Jones.
What’s behind the new strategy? The pharmaceutical industry is facing a “patent cliff” by 2030, as many of its blockbuster drugs are set to lose their patent protection, placing $180 billion in sales at risk and threatening to topple the industry.
According to Jones, for years, when patents expired on profitable drugs, pharmaceutical giants deployed a “mergers and acquisitions” strategy, buying up smaller drug companies to add to their product portfolios.
As a result, the industry is now dominated by a handful of companies, conventional chemical drugs exist for most health issues, and the regulatory process for new ones has become onerous.
Big Pharma has now pivoted to acquiring biotech and biologic companies, whose products are “more complex, unpredictable and difficult and expensive to make,” than chemical-based medicine, Jones wrote.
Conventional drugs are chemically synthesized and have a known structure according to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Biologics come from living humans, animal or microorganism cells, and are technologically altered to target particular proteins or cells in the immune system. The FDA calls biologics “complex mixtures that are not easily identified or characterized.”
As a drug class, biologics offer an appealing solution to the patent cliff problem, because they can’t be easily replicated like generic versions of conventional drugs.
Instead, producers make “biosimilars,” which unlike genetics can’t simply be interchanged with the original drug during a course of treatment without serious safety risks, according to Jones. And while generics are cheap, biosimilars are still expensive to produce. There also are regulatory hurdles to getting biosimilars to market.
However, Jones wrote, the serious safety issues associated with biologics — the high risk of serious adverse events associated with the COVID-19 vaccine, for example — make it difficult for drugmakers to find commercial success in a conventional regulatory environment.
“Luckily for Big Pharma,” Jones wrote, the WHO and its private backers “are pursuing an unprecedented legal process that would cement loopholes that could solve these significant market challenges of at least some biotechnologies.”
Such loopholes made Pfizer and Moderna’s COVID-19 mRNA vaccines — the paradigmatic example of this new strategy — Big Pharma’s highest-selling annual market success ever.
Distribution of the COVID-19 vaccines to approximately 70% of people globally was possible only because of the “fast-tracked, deregulated development and mandated consumption of the experimental drugs,” Jones wrote.
The industry hopes to replicate that model with other drugs. And it has already begun — last month the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, or BARDA, gave Moderna $176 million to develop an mRNA bird flu vaccine.
Stakeholders behind the WHO have turned it into an arm of Big Pharma
According to Jones, the process of rapidly developed and mandated experimental drugs was first adopted by the U.S. military for bioweapons threats. Now, it is being internationally legitimized by the WHO through the agency’s revisions to the International Health Regulations (IHR) and its continued attempt to push its pandemic treaty.
The amendments were watered down and the treaty was partially thwarted at the last meeting of the World Health Assembly, which ended on June 1. However, the powers added to the amendments and the language in the treaty WHO and its backers are still hoping to advance next year show the type of biotech pandemic market Big Pharma has in the works.
According to Jones, this market:
“Will not be one that depends on the free will of consumers to opt in and out of products — but instead relies on tactics of forced consumption and manipulation of regulatory paradigms.
“At the forefront of this push are the WHO’s public-private-partners/private stakeholders, who directly shape and benefit from this policy. Their influence has, in effect, turned the WHO into an arm of Big Pharma, one so powerful that it already demonstrated its ability to morph the entire international regulatory process for the benefit of the pharmaceutical industry during the COVID-19 pandemic.”
These stakeholders can wield this power in part because the WHO receives 80% of its funding from private stakeholders.
Those stakeholders include private-sector giants like Bill Gates, his public-private partnership organizations like the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) and public-sector bureaucrats, such as Dr. Anthony Fauci and Rick Bright, Ph.D., of BARDA and the Rockefeller Foundation, who have been working for years to create a new system that would speed up vaccine production.
During the COVID-19 pandemic period, even states that lacked legal structures to provide emergency authorization for new drugs created them, using the WHO’s Emergency Use Listing Procedure (EUL) as justification, and aided by the WHO’s COVAX vaccine distribution system. COVAX was co-led by the WHO, Gavi, CEPI and Unicef, which are all backed by Gates.
The goal now, Jones wrote, is to institutionalize the procedures that were put in place globally for COVID-19 to pave the way for a new pandemic market.
The One Health agenda, which requires “full-scale surveillance of the human-animal environment,” both before and during pandemics, is central to this plan, he wrote.
Did DOJ Lawyers Commit Fraud in the Omnibus Autism Proceeding?LEARN MORE
The four pillars of the emerging pandemic market
There are four pillars to the plan for securing this market. The pillars are embodied in the WHO’s recently passed IHR amendments and the proposed pandemic treaty.
1. Biosurveillance of “pathogens with pandemic potential”: The WHO is calling on member states to create infrastructure to conduct biosurveillance on entire populations.
WHO private stakeholders, like the Wellcome Trust and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, have been funding such initiatives for years and continue to be at the forefront of similar initiatives today, Jones wrote.
2. Rapid sharing of data and research: Under the IHR amendments, the WHO’s director-general must provide support for member states’ research and development. In the pending treaty, that would include helping them rapidly share data during a pandemic.
Such sharing should help coordinate global pandemic responses and also “pandemic prevention.” That means building a globally coordinated effort to research and share data on diseases that don’t currently pose a public health threat but are allegedly “likely to cause epidemics in the future.”
The WHO’s announcement last week that it is facilitating data-sharing for a new mRNA bird flu vaccine from Argentina is one example.
Experts have raised concerns that incentivizing such “preventive R&D” could incentivize risky gain-of-function research, Jones wrote.
Jones also noted that it is “highly likely” that the same global organizations that partner with the WHO and are funded by its largest private donors will be the ones doing this research and development on vaccines for “future pathogens with pandemic potential” — and also the ones profiting from it.
3. New regulatory pathways: The WHO is developing new regulatory pathways for unapproved medical products to get to market during pandemic emergencies. The IHR amendments are vague on this, Jones wrote, but the proposed language of the treaty aims to speed up emergency authorizations of WHO-recommended investigational “relevant health products.”
The proposed treaty also seeks to compel member countries to take steps to ensure they have the “legal, administrative and financial frameworks in place to support emergency regulatory authorizations for the effective and timely approval of pandemic-related health products during a pandemic.”
4. Global mandates of unapproved products: The final key element in the Big Pharma-WHO plan to pave the way for a new pandemic market is shoring up the global capacity to mandate unapproved medical products.
According to Jones, in July 2023, the WHO adopted the European Union’s (EU) digital COVID-19 passport system, or the “immunity pass” which recorded people’s vaccination records, negative test results or records of previous infections.
“While a digital vaccine passport does not function as a hard mandate in which every citizen of a given population is forced to take a vaccine, it acts as a conditional mandate — one which offers the illusion of choice, but — in reality — restricts the civil liberties of those who do not comply,” Jones wrote.
The 2005 version of the IHR allowed for travel-based mandates that required proof of vaccination to enter countries when there was a public health risk. The new IHR, Jones wrote, expands on this by detailing the kinds of technology that can be used to check such information during future pandemics.
The WHO also is developing its Global Digital Health Certification Network, which expands the EU digital passport system to a global scale. It will digitize vaccination records and health records and will be “interoperable” with existing networks.
While interoperability makes it possible for decentralized data to be shared globally, Jones wrote, “The UN is seeking to impose digital identification as a ‘human right,’ or rather as a condition for accessing other human rights, for the entire global citizenry by 2030, as established in its Sustainable Development Goal 16.9.”
The initiative seeks to provide people with a “trusted, verifiable way” to prove who they are in the physical world and online.
“Verification systems of this size will place the right of citizens to do basic activities — like traveling, eating at a restaurant or working their job — in the hands of governments and potentially employers.
“The rights of civilians will be conditional, dictated by data stored in a massive digital hub that is global in its sharing abilities. Not only will domestic governments have access to the health information of their own citizens under this system, but an entire global bureaucracy will as well.”