Big Pharma Makes Huge Profits From The Transgender Movement – and Their Vaccines Could be Causing it
Could vaccines be changing some people’s brain chemistry in a way that makes them more likely to experience gender dysphoria? Many people who say they are transgender are convinced they’ve always felt this way, but there is some evidence that this could be related to vaccine injury in some individuals.
Autism researcher Dr. Toby Rogers drew attention to the link between vaccine injury and gender dysphoria in an article entitled “Trans messaging is too sophisticated to be the work of a small sexual minority dealing with severe health issues.”
He tackles the topic from the point of view of someone who has fought for LGBT equality and studied gender topics in depth. He said that the message has changed in recent years from the idea that sex is biological while gender is socially constructed to the claim that biological sex itself is somehow a social construct.
He wrote: “The LGBT movement went from “God does not make mistakes” (acceptance) to God as a drunken factory worker who often mixes up parts (get thee to a surgeon for repair!) in the space of just a few years.”
“The modern trans movement does not appear to be a natural outgrowth of the feminist or even gay, lesbian, and bisexual acceptance movement. It is my strong belief that something else altogether is going on here,” he added, and went on to make a convincing case for how the pharmaceutical industry is causing, supporting and benefiting from gender dysphoria.
He points to dozens of studies showing that individuals who experience gender dysphoria have a much higher likelihood of also being autistic, and vice versa. And since autism has often been linked to vaccine injury and toxins inside vaccines, and autistic people are also more likely to be trans, it stands to reason that gender dysphoria could also stem from a vaccine injury.
Interestingly, this would also explain why the trans population suddenly seems to be exploding. Elderly people who were not subject to lengthy vaccine schedules in childhood are much less likely to be trans than younger populations.
The trans movement is a win-win for Big Pharma
It’s probably not a coincidence that the transgender movement gives Big Pharma the perfect way to cover up vaccine injuries. There are people out there who have legitimate feelings of not quite identifying with certain typical male or female behaviors or interests, but the idea that this stems from something inside of them that they’ve suppressed for all their life rather than something that was caused by a vaccine altering their brain chemistry in some way shifts the blame from the pharmaceutical companies to the individual.
Then there’s the most obvious benefit, which is the enormous profitability involved in transition surgery, hormone treatments and other “gender affirming” care. In many of these cases, people must continue taking gender-altering medications for life. No matter which route a person who feels their body doesn’t align with how they perceive themselves takes, pharmaceutical companies win. Even if someone decides against hormones or surgery, there is a good chance they will turn to psychiatric medications to manage their feelings.
“Pharma uses the trans community to make money and normalizes sexual dysphoria to cover up the evidence of Pharma’s crimes,” Rogers asserts.
Of course, other factors might also be to blame for the rising trans movement, or it could be a combination of environmental and social factors. For example, there is no question that young people today are being exposed to unprecedented amounts of endocrine disruptors thanks to the prevalence of plastics in our environment, the overuse of highly toxic pesticides and hormones in everything from poultry to dairy and fish. We already know that pesticides like atrazine can turn male tadpoles into females – and on top of environmental exposure, these chemicals could have also made their way into vaccines.
Rogers also gives us another interesting question to ponder: if vaccines can indeed cause gender dysphoria, how else might they alter one’s thinking?
“Once the brain and gut are injured ALL relationships are changed, not just friendships and intimate partnerships. All interactions in the world are changed,” he warned.
Here’s how NATO and The West are Planning to Trigger WWIII
A whistleblower insider from the United Kingdom Parliament claims that the West is chomping at the bit to launch nuclear weapons and spark a third world war between the Zionist-controlled Anglo-American Axis and the BRICS alliance using massive deception.
UK Member of Parliament (MP) Andrew Bridgen says NATO and its many tentacle nations are planning to stage a false flag attack, probably on a European city, by planting and detonating a nuclear “dirty bomb.” Then in the aftermath, NATO and its members and allies will blame Russia for the attack as a pretext to launch nuclear war.
Bridgen’s anecdotal evidence comes from various defense analysts in military intelligence whom he says told him that there is a lot of nuclear material being transferred all over the place right because of the situation in Ukraine. Some of that material is being diverted for false flag purposes, he says – watch the video below for key portion of a recent interview with Bridgen:
British Member of Parliament Andrew Bridgen is warning the world that NATO is planning to launch a false flag attack on a European city using a nuclear “dirty bomb” and to put the blame on Russia.
— Shadow of Ezra (@ShadowofEzra) June 23, 2024
Bridgen says he is receiving information from defense analysts in military… pic.twitter.com/9VUc8a6wXs
(Related: Did you know that Joe Biden is supposedly sending F-16s to Ukraine right now in defiance of Russia’s red lines?)
False flags always seem to get the job done for tyrants
All throughout history, tyrannical regimes have staged false flag events like the one Bridgen says will happen in order to catalyze their agenda. Their method is simple: strike a target and simply blame the opposition as justification for taking action against the opposition – this is also known as a problem, reaction, solution agenda.
The West is setting the stage for this false flag by pushing the bear hard really right now, crossing every red line issued by Moscow. President Putin is showing great restraint for now, but there will eventually come a time when Russia has no choice but to respond to the constant provocation from the country’s enemies.
The UK where Bridgen serves is right now conducting missile attacks from Ukrainian territory, which is only escalating the matter even further. Any day now, expect to see even more fireworks leading straight to WWIII.
By the way, if you are interested in watching the full interview with Bridgen, you can do so below:
“People need to realize that our enemy isn’t Russia,” wrote someone on YouTube about this whole affair.
“The enemy is within,” responded another.
“Andrew is one of the most courageous politicians in the former ‘great’ Britain,” said another. “If only the millions of people in this nation actually stood up for the country and the future of their children and grandchildren instead of cowering in their homes in fear.”
All Zionist agencies, noted another, wage war “by way of deception.” This includes Mossad, the CIA, NATO and all the rest.
“Russia is under attack and there will be retribution,” said the same person.
“Here’s what happened:
Step 1: NATO supplied the weapons
Step 2: Mossad / CIA did the recruiting and training
Step 3: Controlled opposition media blames ‘Islamists’
The war against Russia is a war against Christianity.”
Finally, someone pointed out that all of these wars are about money, power and influence.
“No citizen gets or has any ‘added value’ from this nonsense. This must stop. Wars must stop.”
How much longer do you think it will be before the nukes start flying? Find out more at WWIII.news.
NewsGuard Co-Founder Advocates Banning Anonymous Social Media Posts, Enabling Lawsuits Against Tech Firms for ‘False’ Content
NewsGuard co-founder and co-CEO Steve Brill has published a book, “The Death of Truth” – but he’s not taking any responsibility. On the contrary.
Namely, Brill’s “apolitical (misinformation) rating system for news sites” as NewsGuard is promoted to customers, is often blasted – and currently investigated by Congress for possible First Amendment violations – as yet another tool to suppress online speech.
But corporate media sing his praises, presenting him as a “media maven.”
A censorship maven more like it, critics would say. And while getting his book promoted, Brill managed to add his name to the steadily growing list of governments, NGOs, and associated figures who are attacking online anonymity.
Along with end-to-end encryption, the ability to interact anonymously is a cornerstone of the internet, but these two key elements that ensure not only privacy but also the security of individuals, companies, etc., have become the two main targets for authoritarian (labeled as such or acting in that spirit) governments.
Brill’s contribution: a set of practical solutions that includes “banning anonymous posting online and funding media literacy programs.”
The problem that this is supposed to fix is, essentially, that social media platforms are not yet fully under control, and therefore neither are their users (and voters).
If anonymity were to be taken out of the equation, Brill is reported as saying – then it would be “easier to sue tech companies for the false content posted on their platforms,” as well as “waging legal campaigns against social media companies for violating their own terms of service.”
There’s another snippet of a veiled threat aimed at tech companies, in terms of what might happen to them if they “misbehave,” (such as letting up on the already extraordinary levels of censorship), especially during a campaign season.
Reporting about Brill’s Washington DC garden party to promote his book and the efforts to “clean up the internet and bring truth back to life” – the Washington Post repeatedly mentions “bad information” as that ominous source of “divisions” and “polarization.”
We’ve been hearing about “misinformation,” “disinformation,” and even “malinformation” that must be fought tooth and nail. But what is “bad information” – could it simply be information that one doesn’t like?
Whatever it is, Brill and his ilk seem willing to dismantle the internet itself, in order to get rid of it.
Former Biden Advisor Claims ‘The First Amendment is Out of Control,’ Hinders Government Action
Even the New York Times looks like it’s treading somewhat lightly while publishing articles aimed at dismantling the very concept of the First Amendment.
An opinion piece penned by an Obama and Biden administration adviser, Tim Wu, is therefore labeled as a “guest essay.” But was it the author, or the newspaper, who decided on the title? Because it is quite scandalous.
“The First Amendment is Out of Control” – that’s the title.
Meanwhile, many believe that attacks on this speech-protecting constitutional amendment are what’s actually out of control these days.
Wu takes a somewhat innovative route to argue against free speech: he painstakingly frames it as concern that the universally mistrusted Big Tech might be abusing it, with the latest Supreme Court ruling regarding Texas and Florida laws, (ab)used as an example.
When the government colludes with mighty entities like major social platforms – the First Amendment becomes the primary recourse to defend speech now expressed in public square forums forged through the pervasiveness of the internet.
So despite Wu’s effort to make his message seem unbiased, the actual takeaways are astonishing: one is that the First Amendment is an obstacle for the government to protect citizens (for being invoked as a tool restraining censorship?)
But this means that the First Amendment, designed to protect citizens from government censorship, is doing its job.
In the same vein, contrary to the sentiment of this “essay,” the amendment is there not to protect “national security” – nor does free speech undermine that, in a democracy.
You don’t like TikTok? Let’s just ban it…but the pesky First Amendment stands in the way of that? What Wu ignores here is that the bill that allows banning TikTok is so ambiguous it can be used to get rid of other, for whatever reason, “disliked” apps.
Wu also doesn’t like that the amendment is used to counter privacy and security-undermining age verification laws, like California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code.
“Suicide pact” is how Wu referred to the impact of the First Amendment in the 1949 dissenting opinion in the Terminiello v. City of Chicago “riot incitement” case.
As has lately become the norm with the First Amendment detractors: this is lots of words, most of them empty, some dramatic, but overall, free speech-unfriendly.
Five States to Sue Pfizer Over Misleading Covid ‘Vaccine’ Claims
Judgment day is coming for pharmaceutical giant Pfizer now that Kansas, Idaho and three other thus far unnamed states are suing the company for misleading Americans about its modRNA (mRNA) Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) “vaccines.”
Led by Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach, the lawsuits allege that Pfizer violated various state statutes – in Kansas it is called the Consumer Protection Act – by falsely claiming that its COVID injections are “safe and effective” against the Chinese Virus.
Pfizer willfully concealed, suppressed and omitted material facts, Kobach alleges, about its chemical shots, which were fast-tracked onto the market through Operation Warp Speed, resulting in many injuries and deaths.
“Pfizer marketed its vaccine as safe for pregnant women,” Kobach said in a statement.
“However, in February of 2021 (they) possessed reports of 458 pregnant women who received Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy. More than half of the pregnant women reported an adverse event, and more than 10% reported a miscarriage.”
Peter Imanuelsen of The Freedom Corner says all five of these lawsuits are “huge news.” They could be enough to really hit hard against a corporate pharmaceutical giant that for decades has been getting away with murder.
“I started to notice something really weird with birth rate statistics,” Imanuelsen writes. “You see, about 9 months after the covid injections were rolled out, we saw a massive collapse in birthrates.”
“Not only that, but we saw that women that did not get the covid injection were overrepresented in giving birth. This made me think.”
(Related: Check out our earlier report about Kobach’s claim that Pfizer misled Kansans on COVID injections.)
Pfizer’s record $75 billion in COVID jab sales should be returned to Americans
Every American deserves a cut of the $75 billion that Pfizer raked in from sales of its COVID shots. That money would best be clawed back from Albert Bourla and his minions, and instead given to We the People who were defrauded by Pfizer.
Remember that Pfizer never ran any true clinical trials as claimed. The few trials that Pfizer claims to have conducted were sham operations “designed, run, analysed and authored by Pfizer employees,” Imanuelsen explains.
One of these sham studies was published in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) back in April 2021. It claimed that preliminary findings showed no significant safety concerns among pregnant women who got shot for COVID.
The observed miscarriages were not unusual, that same study claimed, and were probably not even a direct result of the shots.
Nearly a year later, in February 2022, another study was published in the journal Medicine that contradicted the first. It found that “adverse events” from COVID injections are especially pronounced in pregnant women, who face a 17 percent greater risk compared to the general population.
Despite all this, Pfizer lied to the public and to pregnant women specifically, urging them to take the shots because they had been “proven” to be “safe and effective.”
“Pfizer urged Americans to get vaccinated in order to protect their loved ones, clearly indicating a claim that Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccination stopped transmission,” Kobach said.
“Pfizer later admitted that they’ve never even studied transmission after the recipients receive the vaccine.”
In a public statement, Pfizer said that the lawsuits have “no merit,” and that the company will “respond to the suit in due course.”
“Pfizer is deeply committed to the well-being of the patients it serves and has no higher priority than ensuring the safety and effectiveness of its treatments and vaccines,” Pfizer further said in its own defense.
The latest news about Big Pharma’s crimes against humanity can be found at BadMedicine.news.
Toronto Police Fail to Arrest Naked Men at Gay Sex Pride Parade Because it Wasn’t in The Public’s ‘Interest’
Editor’s note: Some of the links in this article direct to videos or photos that contain nudity. Discretion is advised.
TORONTO (LifeSiteNews) –– The Toronto Police Service decided against arresting or charging fully naked men who were seen participating in Toronto’s LGBT “Pride Parade” events over the weekend because it claimed detaining them would not be in the public’s “best interest.”
Footage from both Friday’s “Trans Pride Parade” and Sunday’s general “Pride Parade” posted online clearly show fully naked men walking in public, despite the fact that the event organizers billed the parades as “family” friendly.
One video shows a man with no clothes on except for a Bugs Bunny mask and rabbit slippers, hoping through the street, fully on display to the crowd.
Toronto’s “Pride Parade” events took place over the weekend and finished off with a large parade on June 30. It is Canada’s largest LGBT-charged event and has the full support of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s Liberal government, as well as many Conservative MPs.
According to Canada’s Criminal Code, “everyone who, without lawful excuse, is nude in a public place is guilty of an offense punishable on summary conviction.”
Despite this, Toronto Police Service, in a general statement to the media, said that arresting fully naked men was not in the “best interest” of the community.
“At large events such as the Pride Parade, which attracts as many as a million people, our number one priority is public safety and ensuring a peaceful event,” noted a spokesperson.
Toronto Police further explained that it was “not” in the “best interest of officers or the community to have police wading into crowds to arrest people for public nudity.”
Toronto Police said that such a charge would require the consent of the attorney general.
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR DAILY HEADLINES US Canada Catholic
According to Canada’s Criminal Code, “no proceedings shall be commenced under this section without the consent of the Attorney General.”
Of important note is that committing indecent exposure to those under the age of 16 is illegal, and does not require the attorney general’s consent.
Toronto’s “Pride Parade” is no stranger to scenes of outright debauchery, and in the past has featured fully naked men in near proximity to children.