News

Deep State civil war may be brewing.

Mika and Joe Scarborough of MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” program told viewers on Thursday that many prominent Democrats, including Joe Biden, believe Barack Obama is working behind the scenes to ditch Sleepy Joe ahead of the 2024 presidential election.

?Morning Joe on the ongoing effort to oust Joe Biden: “The Biden campaign and many Democratic officials do believe that Barack Obama is quietly working behind the scenes to orchestrate this” pic.twitter.com/94Msy3Mf5V

— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) July 11, 2024

Joe Scarborough told his audience, “One thing that we do have to underline here, so viewers can understand what’s happening behind the scenes, is that the Biden campaign and many Democratic officials do believe that Barack Obama is quietly working behind the scenes to orchestrate this. And, if Joe Biden believes that, that’s not going to get him out of the race any faster.”

The mainstream media anchor explained when Obama campaign strategist David Axelrod attacks Biden, it only makes the stubborn puppet politician “dig himself in another day.”

The divide between Democrats has exploded following Biden’s historically disastrous debate with Trump last month as prominent leftists in Hollywood and Washington call for him to step down.

Meanwhile, those still clinging to Sleepy Joe as the party’s candidate are infuriated with the Democrats who understand they cannot win the election with a walking corpse as their leader.

Everybody in the country can see the globalist-controlled U.S. political establishment is set to replace Biden, but will the last-minute effort be enough to stop the MAGA movement sweeping the nation?

---

---

The Saving on a Valuable Education (SAVE) plan is President Joe Biden and Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona’s reply to the Supreme Court, who ruled the administration’s original sweeping forgiveness program was unconstitutional.

The federal student debt loan amount is $1.7 trillion. This debt portfolio is an installment personal loan. Payments occur monthly. Active students have loan totals not due this year. We have no idea how much of the total will be repaid.

The Saving on a Valuable Education (SAVE) plan is President Joe Biden and Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona’s reply to the Supreme Court, who ruled the administration’s original sweeping forgiveness program was unconstitutional. The SAVE plan was announced in August 2023. The White House bulletin included a table of payment amounts, indexed by the number of dependents and size of loan.

It is the greatest gift for all income-dependent student-debt payoff plans. It is a Trojan horse for the state to control higher education.

The “original” student loan program from the sixties repaid loans plus interest in a straightforward installment-style plan. A $7,500 loan might take ten years to fulfill. Larger loans received longer terms.

The federal government’s interjection into debt financing came with the Income-Contingent Repayment plan, passed in the 1993 Student Loan Reform Act signed by then-president Bill Clinton. The Student Loan Reform Act set payments at 20 percent of discretionary income. After twenty-five years of eligible payments, the plan writes off any outstanding debt. This was the first signal that the plans anticipated partial payments on student loans.

The slide toward free university accelerated in 2007 with income-based repayment. Monthly payments were calculated on what a student could pay, not what was owed, resetting Income-Contingent Repayment plan payments from 20 percent of income to 10 percent or 15 percent of discretionary income depending on the date the borrower first started borrowing student loans.

In 2010, President Barack Obama signed the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010. Both the lending and collecting of loans was consolidated within the Department of Education (DOEd). This act nationalized the student loan process, putting it in the hands of political appointees, managed by an unprepared, non-banking-experienced staff. In 2010, student loan debt was half the 2023 total.

Income-dependent payback plans describe the four remaining options for paying student loans. SAVE is a new income-dependent plan. There are four common elements to all income-dependent plans.

Published poverty wages:

Poverty wages are deducted from adjusted gross income to produce “discretionary income.” Early plans deducted 100 percent of poverty wages. In the Affordable Care Act of 2010, poverty wage deductions became 150 percent. Later, the DOEd increased the multiplier to 200 percent. SAVE uses 225 percent of poverty wages.

Payment percentage:

Discretionary income is assessed by a fixed percentage to create a payment due. The original plan from 1993 used 20 percent of discretionary income. This changed to 15 percent of discretionary income in 2007. President (“I have my phone and a pen”) Obama issued a presidential memorandum reducing it from 15 percent to 10 percent.

Length of loan and unpaid balances:

If there is an unbroken record of payments, unpaid balances at the end of a loan term are forgiven. The DOEd waved the surrender flag for taxpayers. All loans will not be paid back to the Treasury.

Special status:

Most recently, the DOEd forgave the administration recently using extralegal authority for 1.5 million debtors with $28 billion in debts that were expunged by a department ruling of “substantial misconduct” by colleges that closed early. $45.7 billion was zeroed out by reclassifying 662,000 public service workers. This type of skullduggery is easier in the SAVE plan.

SAVE uses 225 percent of poverty wages as a deduction to reduce the subjective discretionary income. This reduced discretionary income uses a 5 percent calculation to create a payment due. The smallest amount of discretionary income assesses at the smallest percentage as calculated by the White House.

The SAVE plan is not eligible for loans in default. However, a phone call to the DOEd and enrollment in the “Fresh Start” program makes previously ineligible loans available for SAVE. Student payments that are seventy-five days delinquent will automatically enroll in the SAVE program. This can start the delinquency clock on loans greater than 270 days, erasing the record from credit reports. SAVE will eventually bring all loan payments under one process and one department, directed by the president.

We cannot be certain of the ultimate costs. With appropriate disclaimers (for static budgeting with hyperdynamic plans), the Congressional Budget Office suggests that the cost of implementing SAVE could cost $230 billion. Based on a five-year-old study, just under half of all student debt is estimated to be on income-dependent plans. The current number is likely greater based on trends. These plans have variable monthly payments during the term and have a forgiveness option, making any predictions of a final cost speculative. These plans are continually in flux. Any estimate of cost is a guess, more so after covid.

SAVE has legal challenges from attorney generals from three states. This challenge is not creating headlines. Without an injunction or congressional action, the plan would be initiated in July 2024. In June, twenty-five courts in Kansas and Missouri blocked further enrollment in the SAVE plan.

The SAVE plan fits the long-term goal of increased federal control of public higher education. The president can manipulate the plan to modify payments for a population demographic such as “dreamers” or for a major employment segment such as green energy ambassadors.

The courts’ challenge to this plan must succeed. We need a pause for a better fix on the actual debt. Both political parties have mismanaged this program. There are responsible measures in Congress to bring forward to cap this vote-buying scheme and protect taxpayers.

---

Alex Jones Talks Big Picture In Must-Watch Analysis

---

We must never lose sight of the fact that both the Right and the Left and their various operatives are extensions of the Deep State, which continues to wage psychological warfare on the American people.

“The biggest mistake I see is people waiting for A Big Sign that’ll tell them that things have gone too far. One Big Thing that police or lawmakers or the president/leaders will do that will cross the line. It’ll never come because they won’t cross it. They’ll move the line. That line you think you stand behind is shifting everyday with little actions, bills, legislations… That line will stop moving one day, & it’ll be too late… Every day, your sensitivity is being eroded by these willful atrocities. The envelope for what you’ll accept is being pushed. One day, all of these things will be your new normal.”—Nigerian writer Suyi Davies Okungbowa

The U.S. government is working to re-shape the country in the image of a totalitarian state.

This has remained true over the past 50-plus years no matter which political party held office.

This will remain true no matter who wins the 2024 presidential election.

In the midst of the partisan furor over Project 2025, a 920-page roadmap for how to re-fashion the government to favor so-called conservative causes, both the Right and the Left have proven themselves woefully naive about the dangers posed by the power-hungry Deep State.

Yet we must never lose sight of the fact that both the Right and the Left and their various operatives are extensions of the Deep State, which continues to wage psychological warfare on the American people.

Psychological warfare, according to the Rand Corporation, “involves the planned use of propaganda and other psychological operations to influence the opinions, emotions, attitudes, and behavior of opposition groups.”

For years now, the government has been bombarding the citizenry with propaganda campaigns and psychological operations aimed at keeping us compliant, easily controlled and supportive of the government’s various efforts abroad and domestically.

The government is so confident in its Orwellian powers of manipulation that it’s taken to bragging about them. For example, in 2022, the U.S. Army’s 4th Psychological Operations Group, the branch of the military responsible for psychological warfare, released a recruiting video that touts its efforts to pull the strings, turn everything they touch into a weapon, be everywhere, deceive, persuade, change, influence, and inspire.

“Have you ever wondered who’s pulling the strings?” the psyops video posits. “Anything we touch is a weapon. We can deceive, persuade, change, influence, inspire. We come in many forms. We are everywhere.”

This is the danger that lurks in plain sight.

Of the many weapons in the government’s vast arsenal, psychological warfare may be the most devastating in terms of the long-term consequences.

As the military journal Task and Purpose explains, “Psychological warfare is all about influencing governments, people of power, and everyday citizens.”

Mind you, these psyops (psychological operations) campaigns aren’t only aimed at foreign enemies. The government has made clear in word and deed that “we the people” are domestic enemies to be targeted, tracked, manipulated, micromanaged, surveilled, viewed as suspects, and treated as if our fundamental rights are mere privileges that can be easily discarded.

This is what is referred to as “apple-pie propaganda.”

Aided and abetted by technological advances and scientific experimentation, the government has been subjecting the American people to “apple-pie propaganda” for the better part of the last century.

Consider some of the ways in which the government continues to wage psychological warfare on a largely unsuspecting citizenry in order to acclimate us to the Deep State’s totalitarian agenda.

Weaponizing violence in order to institute martial law. With alarming regularity, the nation continues to be subjected to spates of violence that terrorizes the public, destabilizes the country’s ecosystem, and gives the government greater justifications to crack down, lock down, and institute even more authoritarian policies for the so-called sake of national security without many objections from the citizenry.

Weaponizing surveillance, pre-crime and pre-thought campaigns. Surveillance, digital stalking and the data mining of the American people add up to a society in which there’s little room for indiscretions, imperfections, or acts of independence. When the government sees all and knows all and has an abundance of laws to render even the most seemingly upstanding citizen a criminal and lawbreaker, then the old adage that you’ve got nothing to worry about if you’ve got nothing to hide no longer applies. Add pre-crime programs into the mix with government agencies and corporations working in tandem to determine who is a potential danger and spin a sticky spider-web of threat assessments, behavioral sensing warnings, flagged “words,” and “suspicious” activity reports using automated eyes and ears, social media, behavior sensing software, and citizen spies, and you having the makings for a perfect dystopian nightmare. The government’s war on crime has now veered into the realm of social media and technological entrapment, with government agents adopting fake social media identities and AI-created profile pictures in order to surveil, target and capture potential suspects.

Weaponizing digital currencies, social media scores and censorship. Tech giants, working with the government, have been meting out their own version of social justice by way of digital tyranny and corporate censorship, muzzling whomever they want, whenever they want, on whatever pretext they want in the absence of any real due process, review or appeal. Unfortunately, digital censorship is just the beginning. Digital currencies (which can be used as “a tool for government surveillance of citizens and control over their financial transactions”), combined with social media scores and surveillance capitalism create a litmus test to determine who is worthy enough to be part of society and punish individuals for moral lapses and social transgressions (and reward them for adhering to government-sanctioned behavior). In China, millions of individuals and businesses, blacklisted as “unworthy” based on social media credit scores that grade them based on whether they are “good” citizens, have been banned from accessing financial markets, buying real estate or travelling by air or train.

Weaponizing compliance. Even the most well-intentioned government law or program can be—and has been—perverted, corrupted and used to advance illegitimate purposes once profit and power are added to the equation. The war on terror, the war on drugs, the war on COVID-19, the war on illegal immigration, asset forfeiture schemes, road safety schemes, school safety schemes, eminent domain: all of these programs started out as legitimate responses to pressing concerns and have since become weapons of compliance and control in the police state’s hands.

Weaponizing entertainment. For the past century, the Department of Defense’s Entertainment Media Office has provided Hollywood with equipment, personnel and technical expertise at taxpayer expense. In exchange, the military industrial complex has gotten a starring role in such blockbusters as Top Gun and its rebooted sequel Top Gun: Maverick, which translates to free advertising for the war hawks, recruitment of foot soldiers for the military empire, patriotic fervor by the taxpayers who have to foot the bill for the nation’s endless wars, and Hollywood visionaries working to churn out dystopian thrillers that make the war machine appear relevant, heroic and necessary. As Elmer Davis, a CBS broadcaster who was appointed the head of the Office of War Information, observed, “The easiest way to inject a propaganda idea into most people’s minds is to let it go through the medium of an entertainment picture when they do not realize that they are being propagandized.”

Weaponizing behavioral science and nudging. Apart from the overt dangers posed by a government that feels justified and empowered to spy on its people and use its ever-expanding arsenal of weapons and technology to monitor and control them, there’s also the covert dangers associated with a government empowered to use these same technologies to influence behaviors en masse and control the populace. In fact, it was President Obama who issued an executive order directing federal agencies to use “behavioral science” methods to minimize bureaucracy and influence the way people respond to government programs. It’s a short hop, skip and a jump from a behavioral program that tries to influence how people respond to paperwork to a government program that tries to shape the public’s views about other, more consequential matters. Thus, increasingly, governments around the world—including in the United States—are relying on “nudge units” to steer citizens in the direction the powers-that-be want them to go, while preserving the appearance of free will.

Weaponizing desensitization campaigns aimed at lulling us into a false sense of security. The events of recent years—the invasive surveillance, the extremism reports, the civil unrest, the protests, the shootings, the bombings, the military exercises and active shooter drills, the lockdowns, the color-coded alerts and threat assessments, the fusion centers, the transformation of local police into extensions of the military, the distribution of military equipment and weapons to local police forces, the government databases containing the names of dissidents and potential troublemakers—have conspired to acclimate the populace to accept a police state willingly, even gratefully.

Weaponizing politics. The language of fear is spoken effectively by politicians on both sides of the aisle, shouted by media pundits from their cable TV pulpits, marketed by corporations, and codified into bureaucratic laws that do little to make our lives safer or more secure. Fear, as history shows, is the method most often used by politicians to increase the power of government and control a populace, dividing the people into factions, and persuading them to see each other as the enemy. This Machiavellian scheme has so ensnared the nation that few Americans even realize they are being manipulated into adopting an “us” against “them” mindset. Instead, fueled with fear and loathing for phantom opponents, they agree to pour millions of dollars and resources into political elections, militarized police, spy technology and endless wars, hoping for a guarantee of safety that never comes. All the while, those in power—bought and paid for by lobbyists and corporations—move their costly agendas forward, and “we the suckers” get saddled with the tax bills and subjected to pat downs, police raids and round-the-clock surveillance.

Weaponizing genetics. Not only does fear grease the wheels of the transition to fascism by cultivating fearful, controlled, pacified, cowed citizens, but it also embeds itself in our very DNA so that we pass on our fear and compliance to our offspring. It’s called epigenetic inheritance, the transmission through DNA of traumatic experiences. For example, neuroscientists observed that fear can travel through generations of mice DNA. As The Washington Post reports, “Studies on humans suggest that children and grandchildren may have felt the epigenetic impact of such traumatic events such as famine, the Holocaust and the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.”

Weaponizing the dystopian future. With greater frequency, the government has been issuing warnings about the dire need to prepare for the dystopian future that awaits us. For instance, the Pentagon training video, “Megacities: Urban Future, the Emerging Complexity,” predicts that by 2030 (coincidentally, the same year that society begins to achieve singularity with the metaverse) the military would be called on to use armed forces to solve future domestic political and social problems. What they’re really talking about is martial law, packaged as a well-meaning and overriding concern for the nation’s security. The chilling five-minute training video paints an ominous picture of the future bedeviled by “criminal networks,” “substandard infrastructure,” “religious and ethnic tensions,” “impoverishment, slums,” “open landfills, over-burdened sewers,” a “growing mass of unemployed,” and an urban landscape in which the prosperous economic elite must be protected from the impoverishment of the have nots. “We the people” are the have-nots.

The end goal of these mind control campaigns—packaged in the guise of the greater good—is to see how far the American people will allow the government to go in undermining our freedoms.

The facts speak for themselves.

Whatever else it may be—a danger, a menace, a threat—the U.S. government is certainly not looking out for our best interests, nor is it in any way a friend to freedom.

When the government views itself as superior to the citizenry, when it no longer operates for the benefit of the people, when the people are no longer able to peacefully reform their government, when government officials cease to act like public servants, when elected officials no longer represent the will of the people, when the government routinely violates the rights of the people and perpetrates more violence against the citizenry than the criminal class, when government spending is unaccountable and unaccounted for, when the judiciary act as courts of order rather than justice, and when the government is no longer bound by the laws of the Constitution, then you no longer have a government “of the people, by the people and for the people.”

What we have, as I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People and in its fictional counterpart The Erik Blair Diaries, is a government of wolves.

---

Alex Jones Talks Big Picture In Must-Watch Analysis

---

Open borders pushing many minority Americans to vote Republican

Radical black activist Dr. Umar Rashad Ibn Abdullah-Johnson joined the popular “Breakfast Club” radio program this week where he exposed how the Biden administration’s open border policy is harming African Americans.

“When Joe Biden got elected he said he wanted to fast track four million undocumented residents to full citizenship. Black people completely ignored it. I spoke on it,” Dr. Umar told “Breakfast Club” host Charlamagne tha God.

Black people finally realizing they are being replaced by the illegals

I’ve been saying this for years

Blacks will no longer be able to enjoy the welfare state, replacement migration includes them too

These illegals are here to replace us all

pic.twitter.com/d5i6OT5etd

— Drew Hernandez (@DrewHLive) July 10, 2024

Dr. Umar explained Biden wanted to bring in millions of illegals because he knew he wasn’t going to do anything for the black Americans who voted for him in 2020.

“So, what he’s gonna do is have these migrants already set up with citizenship so they can replace the black vote that he loses,” he said.

“The migrants are being put into our communities on purpose – New York and Chicago – because they are the two blackest cities in America, they’re the two largest cities in America, they’re the two most politically conscious black communities in America.”

The activist continued to note that if black people in the two largest cities could be replaced with illegals, other major cities like Philadelphia, Atlanta, Houston and others “don’t stand a chance.”

The reason illegals are being brought into the country, according to Dr. Umar, is to replace black Americans “at the polls and in low-end industry jobs.”

While the doctor is hyper-focused on black issues and racial division, he correctly told the show’s hosts about how illegals often receive much better government benefits than Americans in need.

“So, you got black people who pay taxes living on the street and you got migrants who ain’t paid a single tax in their life eating and living better than the black people who built the country,” he vented.

Regarding the black Democrat mayors of Chicago and New York, Dr. Umar questioned why they’d risk their political careers to “push this migrant agenda.”

The likely answer is that between ignorant liberal voters, mainstream media propaganda on their side and rigged elections, Democrat politicians understand they can continue being re-elected despite failing to fulfill campaign promises.

It’s great that black Americans are being exposed to this type of questioning the Democrat-run system on a larger scale, but many are still hypnotized by leftist indoctrination.

---

Lockdowns are a massive interference with competitive capitalism. They provide the best possible subsidy to big business while shutting down independent small businesses and putting them at a huge disadvantage once the opening up happens.

We’ve just come across a document hosted by the Department of Homeland Security, posted March 2023, but written in 2007, that amounts to a full-blown corporatist imposition on the US, abolishing anything remotely resembling the Bill of Rights and Constitutional law. It is right there in plain sight for anyone curious enough to dig. 

There is nothing in it that you haven’t already experienced with lockdowns. What makes it interesting are the participants in the forging of the plan, which is pretty much the whole of corporate America as it stood in 2007. It was a George W. Bush initiative. The conclusions are startling. 

“Quarantine is a legally enforceable declaration that a government body may institute over individuals potentially exposed to a disease, but who are not symptomatic. If enacted, Federal quarantine laws will be coordinated between CDC and State and local public health officials, and, if necessary, law enforcement personnel…The government may also enact travel restrictions to limit the movement of people and products between geographic areas in an effort to limit disease transmission and spread. Authorities are currently reviewing possible plans to curtail international travel upon a pandemic’s emergence overseas.

“Limiting public assembly opportunities also helps limit the spread of disease. Concert halls, movie theaters, sports arenas, shopping malls, and other large public gathering places might close indefinitely during a pandemic—whether because of voluntary closures or government-imposed closures. Similarly, officials may close schools and non-essential businesses during pandemic waves in an effort to significantly slow disease transmission rates. These strategies aim to prevent the close interaction of individuals, the primary conduit of spreading the influenza virus. Even taking steps such as limiting person-to-person interactions within a distance of three feet or avoiding instances of casual close contact, such as shaking hands, will help limit disease spread.”

There we have it: the pandemic plans. They once seemed abstract. In 2020, they became very real. Your rights were deleted. No more freedom even to have house guests. In those days, the rule was to enforce only three feet of distance rather than six feet of distance, neither of which had any basis in science. Indeed, the actual scientific literature even at that time recommended against any physical interventions designed to limit the spread of respiratory viruses. They were known not to work. The entire profession of public health accepted that. 

Therefore, for many years before lockdowns wrecked economic functioning, there had been two parallel tracks in operation, one intellectual/academic and one imposed by state/corporate managers. They had nothing to do with each other. This situation persisted for the better part of 15 years. Suddenly in 2020, there was a reckoning, and the state/corporate managers won it. Seemingly out of nowhere, liberty as we have long known it was gone. 

Back in 2005, I first came across a Bush administration scheme, an early draft of the above, that would have ended freedom as we know it. It was a scheme for combating the bird flu, which officials back then imagined would involve universal quarantines, business and event closures, travel restrictions, and more. 

I wrote: “Even if the flu does come, and taxpayers have coughed up, the government will surely have a ball imposing travel restrictions, shutting down schools and businesses, quarantining cities, and banning public gatherings…It is a serious matter when the government purports to plan to abolish all liberty and nationalize all economic life and put every business under the control of the military, especially in the name of a bug that seems largely restricted to the bird population. Perhaps we should pay more attention. Perhaps such plans for the total state ought to even ruffle our feathers a bit.”

For years I wrote about this topic, trying to get others interested. It was all there in black and white. At the drop of a hat, under the guise of a pandemic that only state managers can declare, real or drummed up, freedom itself could be abolished. These plans were never legislated, debated, or publicly discussed. They were simply posted as the result of various consultations with experts, who worked out their totalitarian fantasies as if scripting a Hollywood film. 

The 2007 blueprint is more explicit than anything I’ve seen. It comes from the National Infrastructure Advisory Council, which “includes executive leaders from the private sector and state/local government who advise the White House on how to reduce physical and cyber risks and improve the security and resilience of the nation’s critical infrastructure sectors. The NIAC is administered on behalf of the President in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act under the authority of the Secretary of the US Department of Homeland Security.”

And who sat on this committee in 2007 that decided that governments “may close schools and non-essential businesses”? Let us see. 

• Mr. Edmund G. Archuleta, General Manager, El Paso Water Utilities
• Mr. Alfred R. Berkeley III, Chairman and CEO, Pipeline Trading Group, LLC, and former President and Vice Chairman of NASDAQ
• Chief Rebecca F. Denlinger, Fire Chief, Cobb County (Ga.) Fire and Emergency Services
• Chief Gilbert G. Gallegos, Police Chief (ret.), City of Albuquerque, N.M. Police Department
• Ms. Martha H. Marsh, President and CEO, Stanford Hospital and Clinics
• Mr. James B. Nicholson, President and CEO, PVS Chemical, Inc.
• Mr. Erle A. Nye, Chairman Emeritus, TXU Corp., NIAC Chairman
• Mr. Bruce A. Rohde, Chairman and CEO Emeritus, ConAgra Foods, Inc.
• Mr. John W. Thompson, Chairman and CEO, Symantec Corporation
• Mr. Brent Baglien, ConAgra Foods, Inc.
• Mr. David Barron, Bell South
• Mr. Dan Bart, TIA
• Mr. Scott Blanchette, Healthways
• Ms. Donna Burns, Georgia Emergency Management Agency
• Mr. Rob Clyde, Symantec Corporation
• Mr. Scott Culp, Microsoft
• Mr. Clay Detlefsen, International Dairy Foods Association
• Mr. Dave Engaldo, The Options Clearing Corporation
• Ms. Courtenay Enright, Symantec Corporation
• Mr. Gary Gardner, American Gas Association
• Mr. Bob Garfield, American Frozen Foods Institute
• Ms. Joan Gehrke, PVS Chemical, Inc.
• Ms. Sarah Gordon, Symantec
• Mr. Mike Hickey, Verizon
• Mr. Ron Hicks, Anadarko Petroleum Corporation
• Mr. George Hender, The Options Clearing Corporation
• Mr. James Hunter, City of Albuquerque, NM Emergency Management
• Mr. Stan Johnson, North American Electric Reliability Council (NERC)
• Mr. David Jones, El Paso Corporation
• Inspector Jay Kopstein, Operations Division, New York City Police Department (NYPD)
• Ms. Tiffany Jones, Symantec Corporation
• Mr. Bruce Larson, American Water
• Mr. Charlie Lathram, Business Executives for National Security (BENS)/BellSouth
• Mr. Turner Madden, Madden & Patton
• Chief Mary Beth Michos, Prince William County (Va.) Fire and Rescue
• Mr. Bill Muston, TXU Corp.
• Mr. Vijay Nilekani, Nuclear Energy Institute
• Mr. Phil Reitinger, Microsoft
• Mr. Rob Rolfsen, Cisco Systems, Inc.
• Mr. Tim Roxey, Constellation
• Ms. Charyl Sarber, Symantec
• Mr. Lyman Shaffer, Pacific Gas and Electric,
• Ms. Diane VanDeHei, Association of Metropolitan Water Agencies (AMWA)
• Ms. Susan Vismor, Mellon Financial Corporation
• Mr. Ken Watson, Cisco Systems, Inc.
• Mr. Greg Wells, Southwest Airlines
• Mr. Gino Zucca, Cisco Systems, Inc.
• Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Resources
• Dr. Bruce Gellin, Rockefeller Foundation 
• Dr. Mary Mazanec
• Dr. Stuart Nightingale, CDC
• Ms. Julie Schafer
• Dr. Ben Schwartz, CDC
• Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Resources
• Mr. James Caverly, Director, Infrastructure Partnerships Division
• Ms. Nancy Wong, NIAC Designated Federal Officer (DFO)
• Ms. Jenny Menna, NIAC Designated Federal Officer (DFO)
• Dr. Til Jolly
• Mr. Jon MacLaren
• Ms. Laverne Madison
• Ms. Kathie McCracken
• Mr. Bucky Owens
• Mr. Dale Brown, Contractor
• Mr. John Dragseth, IP attorney, Contractor
• Mr. Jeff Green, Contractor
• Mr. Tim McCabe, Contractor
• Mr. William B. Anderson, ITS America
• Mr. Michael Arceneaux, Association of Metropolitan Water Agencies (AMWA)
• Mr. Chad Callaghan, Marriott Corporation
• Mr. Ted Cromwell, American Chemistry Council (ACC)
• Ms. Jeanne Dumas, American Trucking Association (ATA)
• Ms. Joan Harris, US Department of Transportation, Office of the Secretary
• Mr. Greg Hull, American Public Transportation Association
• Mr. Joe LaRocca, National Retail Federation
• Mr. Jack McKlveen, United Parcel Service (UPS)
• Ms. Beth Montgomery, Wal-Mart
• Dr. J. Patrick O’Neal, Georgia Office of EMS/Trauma/EP
• Mr. Roger Platt, The Real Estate Roundtable
• Mr. Martin Rojas, American Trucking Association (ATA)
• Mr. Timothy Sargent, Senior Chief, Economic Analysis and Forecasting Division, Economic and Fiscal Policy Branch, Finance Canada

In other words, big everything: food, energy, retail, computers, water, and you name it. It’s a corporatist dream team. 

Consider ConAgra itself. What is that? It is Banquet, Chef Boyardee, Healthy Choice, Orville Redenbacher’s, Reddi-Wip, Slim Jim, Hunt’s Peter Pan Egg Beaters, Hebrew National, Marie Callender’s, P.F. Chang’s, Ranch Style Beans, Ro*Tel, Wolf Brand Chili, Angie’s, Duke’s, Gardein, Frontera, Bertolli, among many other seemingly independent brands that are all actually one company. 

Now, ask yourself: why might all these companies favor a plan for lockdowns? Why might WalMart, for example? It stands to reason. Lockdowns are a massive interference with competitive capitalism. They provide the best possible subsidy to big business while shutting down independent small businesses and putting them at a huge disadvantage once the opening up happens. 

In other words, it is an industrial racket, very much akin to interwar-style fascism, a corporatist combination of big business and big government. Throw pharma into the mix and you see exactly what came to pass in 2020, which amounted to the largest transfer of wealth from small and medium-sized business plus the middle class to wealthy industrialists in the history of humanity. 

The document is open even about managing information flows: “The public and private sectors should align their communications, exercises, investments, and support activities absolutely with both the plan and priorities during a pandemic influenza event. Continue data gathering, analysis, reporting, and open review.”

There is nothing in any of this that fits with any Western tradition of law and liberty. Nothing. It was never approved by any democratic means. It was never part of any political campaign. It has never been the subject of any serious media examination. No think tank has ever pushed back on such plans in any systematic way. 

The last serious attempt to debunk this whole apparatus was from D.H. Henderson in 2006. His two co-authors on that paper eventually came around to going along with lockdowns of 2020. Henderson died in 2016. One of the co-authors of the original article told me that if Dr. Henderson had been around, instead of Dr. Fauci, the lockdowns would never have taken place. 

Here we are four years following the deployment of this lockdown machinery, and we are witness to what it destroys. It would be nice to say that the entire apparatus and theory behind it have been fully discredited. 

But that is not correct. All the plans are still in place. There have been no changes in federal law. Not one effort has been made to dismantle the corporatist/biosecurity planning state that made all this possible. Every bit of it is in place for the next go-around. 

Much of the authority for this whole coup traces to the Public Health Services Act of 1944, which was passed in wartime. For the first time in US history, it gave the federal government the power to quarantine. Even when the Biden administration was looking for some basis to justify its transportation mask mandate, it fell back to this one piece of legislation. 

If anyone really wants to get to the root of this problem, there are decisive steps that need to be taken. The indemnification of pharma from liability for harm needs to be repealed. The court precedent of forced shots in Jacobson needs to be overthrown. But even more fundamentally, the quarantine power itself has to go, and that means the full repeal of the Public Health Services Act of 1944. That is the root of the problem. Freedom will not be safe until it is uprooted. 

As it stands right now, everything that unfolded in 2020 and 2021 can happen again. Indeed, the plans are in place for exactly that.

---

Alex Jones Talks Big Picture In Must-Watch Analysis

---

Regardless if it’s mRNA, viral vector or classical, all Covid shot technologies can result in hepatitis, according to case studies on the matter.

A number of case studies document a phenomenon where individuals injected with the Covid vaccine develop hepatitis.

The phenomena is exhibited regardless of if the Covid vaccine is mRNA-based, such as with Pfizer, viral vector-based, such as with AstraZeneca, or a classical denatured virus-based shot, such as Sinopharm. Presented are three case studies for each of the vaccine technologies.

In the first case study, a 35-year-old man died after contracting hepatitis from his AstraZeneca Covid shot.

“This article presents a young man who developed fulminant hepatitis a few days after vaccination with the first dose of the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine,” the case study said in the ‘Abstract’ section. “He received the first dose of the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine 8 days earlier. He was admitted to the hospital with a chief complaint of abdominal pain. On admission and because of his high D-dimers, low platelet count, and low Fibrinogen level, vaccine-induced immune thrombosis thrombocytopenia was suspected, which was ruled out later. Then, after a surge in his liver function tests, decreasing platelet, and abnormal clotting tests, fulminant hepatitis was considered for this patient. Several bacterial, viral, and autoimmune etiologies were then suspected, with all ruled out. Thus, fulminant hepatitis secondary to his AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine was confirmed.”

The second case study documented how a man contracted hepatitis following the Sinopharm Covid vaccine.

“This study presents a case of hepatitis initiated by Sinopharm vaccine for COVID-19. A 62-year-old man presented with jaundice, weight loss and elevated liver enzymes three days after getting the second dose of COVID-19 vaccine. Microscopic sections showed hepatitis pattern of injury with both portal and lobular inflammation and marked eosinophils infiltration,” the case study said in the ‘Case Presentation’ section.

What’s interesting is that while mRNA and viral vector Covid vaccines have been documented to cause hepatitis, the Sinopharm Covid shot has too, despite being a classical vaccine.

“Several cases of hepatitis have been reported after COVID-19 vaccines, but almost all of them were diagnosed as autoimmune hepatitis, triggered by COVID-19 mRNA or viral vector vaccines but the present case is one of the first reported cases of hepatitis after Sinopharm vaccine, an inactivated virus COVID-19 vaccine. Spontaneous decrease in liver enzyme levels, without corticosteroids therapy, is against to the diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis in other reported cases,” the case study said in the ‘Discussion’ section.

In a third case study, a 35-year-old female had her autoimmune hepatitis, which was in remission, reactivate after administration of the Pfizer Covid vaccination.

“A 35-year-old Asian female with a pertinent past medical history of autoimmune hepatitis presented with an acute recurrence of autoimmune hepatitis two weeks after receiving the second dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech messenger RNA (mRNA) coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine. Nine cases of autoimmune hepatitis after the administration of the COVID-19 vaccine have been reported, but this is the first documented case of a reactivation of autoimmune hepatitis in remission,” the case study said in the ‘Abstract’ section.

In fact, in one repository, there are 35 case studies on the phenomena.

“The clinical characteristics of a total of 35 currently reported cases of AIH [autoimmune hepatitis] after COVID-19 vaccination are summarised and it is suggested that patients with autoimmune diseases may be at higher risk of developing AIH after vaccination,” the repository said.

The Covid shots are known to make people retarded, increase in lethality after repeated doses and double the death rate of Covid patients while vaccinated kids face a 4,423 percent higher all-cause mortality rate and 74 percent of the vaccinated who’ve died were killed by the shots, yet the death rate is still higher than what is reported and it also increases Covid infection rates and all cause mortality in addition to increasing the death numbers, results in tons of bizarre and unusual skin disorders, insane and gross turbocancers, reproductive destruction, caused miscarriages, paralyzation, tinnitus, blood clots in the brain, non-serious disorders, death by neurological disorder, increased excess death rates, autoimmune disorders in the thyroid, as well as deadly headaches, seizures and heart inflammation including in children, while also causing the vaccinated people’s skin to ‘erupt’, in addition to a multitude of serious ailments seen in massive population studies while also containing hundreds of times the allowable levels of DNA contamination leading to mutagenic effects, contaminating the blood supply, as well as permanently altering the DNA of the vaccinated and their offspring, but while some batches are worse than others, the injections are still killing people and are expected to kill people for a very long time into the future.

In the U.S. the CDC recommends that all Americans receive their Covid shot and that young children receive extra, as well as that all Americans now receive another shot, despite receiving them previously, while Canada recommends another Covid shot for the pregnant, indigenous, ‘racialized’ & ‘equity-deserving’.

---

EXCLUSIVE: Roger Stone Believes The Deep State May Assassinate Joe Biden

---