News

Comedian Jon Stewart Exposes Covid Scamdemic in Hilarious Guest Appearance on ‘The Late Show With Stephen Colbert’

Comedian Jon Stewart Exposes Covid Scamdemic in Hilarious Guest Appearance on ‘The Late Show With Stephen Colbert’

adminJul 12, 20245 min read

Comedian Jon Stewart Exposes Covid Scamdemic in Hilarious Guest Appearance on ‘The Late Show With Stephen Colbert’

Stewart also slams Dems for excusing Biden’s obvious cognitive decline during the debate.

American comedian, liberal political commentator and “The Daily Show” host Jon Stewart had a hilarious guest appearance on “The Late Show with Stephen Colbert,” where he talked about how the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic was caused and created by science and that it has scammed the public into believing that the virus came from bats.

Stewart noted that he has a great debt of gratitude to science. He said science has in many ways helped ease the suffering of the pandemic, which was also more than likely caused by science.

“What are you saying? So, there is a chance that this [virus] was created in a lab?” Colbert bantered.

This was immediately responded to by Stewart with, “A chance?”

He then hysterically recited a dialogue with an imaginary person saying, “Oh my God, there is a novel respiratory coronavirus overtaking Wuhan, China. What do we do?” He comedically answered himself with: “Oh no, we can ask the Wuhan novel respiratory coronavirus lab.” He argued that the disease is the same name as the laboratory. “That’s just a little too weird, don’t you think?”

He continued by saying he “asked” a scientist how the virus spread to people. Stewart funnily answered himself again, “Well, a pangolin kissed a turtle?” He was on a roll as he continued saying “Maybe a bat flew in the cloaca of the turkey and then it sneezed into my chili and now we all have coronavirus.”

Colbert chimed in, volunteering a piece of information from the official narrative as to how COVID-19 originated: “It could be possible that they have a coronavirus laboratory in Wuhan to study the virus because, in Wuhan, there are a lot of novel coronavirus diseases because of the bat population there.”

This “enraged” Stewart as he answered sarcastically: “Sure. It’s the only place you find bats. You won’t find bats anywhere else. Oh wait, Austin, Texas has thousands of them that fly in the caves every night.”

Stewart slams Dems for excusing Biden’s obvious cognitive decline during the debate

Meanwhile, in a recent commentary on his show, Stewart blasted Democrats and the White House for creating excuses for what he described as a “shocking display of cognitive difficulty” by President Joe Biden during the presidential debate late last month.

“The point is, for a campaign based on honesty and decency, the spin about the debate appears to be blatant b——-, and the redemption tour hasn’t gone that much better,” Stewart said.

Stewart played a compilation of Biden clips in which the president read “pause” and “repeat the line” from a teleprompter, along with other lapses in memory, including the time he claimed to have spoken to a long-dead former president of France. According to the Comedy Central host, Biden’s poor performance was “recognizable to, unfortunately, anybody who’s dealt with aging parents, and it’s a hard watch.”

He then said that former President Donald Trump “delivered at the debate to expectation. We expect him to be f—— crazy. But Biden’s performance and inability to articulate at times was stunning, like, I could not believe what I was watching.”

“But then it got worse,” Stewart went on. “Rather than respecting the American people and having an honest, at least partial, conversation about what we had all seen, we were told immediately, ‘These are not the droids you’re looking for.’”

He then streamed another compilation of Democrats making excuses for Biden’s poor performance, blaming jet lag and a cold. Stewart noted that the president had been home from Europe for almost two weeks.

Biden has been facing calls to step down after the catastrophic debate. His allies have argued that Biden is already the nominee and voters have no choice but to back him given the threat of authoritarianism under Trump. But Stewart isn’t buying it.

“‘Get On Board Or Shut The F— Up’ is not a particularly compelling pro-democracy bumper sticker,” he said.

Stewart disagrees with some of Biden’s supporters’ argument that it’s too late to change candidates since there are only four months until the election.

“Four months is for-f—–g-ever,” he said and put that timeframe into perspective, citing Britain which just held an election, and France, which had two in one month and even defeated fascism and “still had time to have an affair with Denmark.”

(Related: Prominent Democratic strategist says it’s too late to talk about replacing Biden as party goes into full panic mode over disastrous debate performance.)

He said he’s not calling Biden to drop out but wants the nation to “stress test” the situation to see what options emerge.

“Do you have any idea how thirsty Americans are for any hint of inspiration or leadership and a release from this choice of a megalomaniac and a suffocating gerontocracy,” he said. “It is crushing our f—— spirits.”


EXCLUSIVE: Roger Stone Believes The Deep State May Assassinate Joe Biden


VIDEO: Mick Jagger Recoils in Horror as Canadians Reject His Worship of Trudeau

VIDEO: Mick Jagger Recoils in Horror as Canadians Reject His Worship of Trudeau

adminJul 12, 20241 min read

VIDEO: Mick Jagger Recoils in Horror as Canadians Reject His Worship of Trudeau

Old rockstar man seemed shocked that Canadians don’t like Trudeau as much as he does.

On the Thursday show Rolling Stones geriatric frontman Mick Jagger was excoriated by a Canadian audience who rejected his vocal support for Prime Minister Trudeau.

Don’t miss:

EXCLUSIVE: Roger Stone Believes The Deep State May Assassinate Joe Biden


They Bombed us on Purpose – Donbass Refugee Tells RT (Video)

They Bombed us on Purpose – Donbass Refugee Tells RT (Video)

adminJul 12, 20242 min read

They Bombed us on Purpose – Donbass Refugee Tells RT (Video)

Ukrainian forces went after their own civilians, according to testimonials.

Two women who managed to escape from the Donbass city of Chasov Yar have told RT about how the Ukrainian military deliberately targeted its own civilians in the hotly contested city.

Chasov Yar used to have about 12,500 residents before the conflict, but found itself on the front line after Russian forces took neighboring Artyomovsk (also known as Bakhmut) in 2023. 

“They [Ukrainian forces] burned approximately 50 houses on our street. There are no houses left,” a woman who gave her name as Tatyana told RT in an exclusive interview. “It seems like they did it on purpose.”

Tatyana and her family hid in basements, but one day her husband went out for a smoke and was killed by a drone strike.

“It was probably a kamikaze drone, there were batteries and all sorts of tubes around him,” she recalled, through tears. “My son picked up his father. He was already dead.”

READ MORE: Russian troops are storming New York. Are you confused? Well, read this

After that, Tatyana and her son Kostya fled to another ruined house and hid there, but came under drone fire themselves. The first strike injured Kostya. The second buried them both in debris. Then a third one came and “everything went black,” Tatyana said. When she opened her eyes and looked at where Kostya had been, “there was no head,” only a red smear on the wall.

Zarina, a medical worker, told RT that the Ukrainian military fired a ballistic missile into a civilian area “at the beginning of spring,” then sent a patrol to retrieve the pieces of the Tochka-U, so it could not be identified.

She also testified that on one occasion, Ukrainian forces began shelling their own civilians within hours of a group of foreign journalists arriving in town. 

“To say it was Russia,” Zarina responded, when asked why they would have done so. “They also cut the electricity, to say the Russians did it.” 


EXCLUSIVE: Roger Stone Believes The Deep State May Assassinate Joe Biden


Biden Admin Tries to Stop Anti-Censorship Injunction in Kennedy v. Biden Censorship Lawsuit

Biden Admin Tries to Stop Anti-Censorship Injunction in Kennedy v. Biden Censorship Lawsuit

adminJul 12, 20243 min read
The injunction refers to the defendants: the White House, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the FBI, and is there to stop them from attempting to remove content by undertaking any kind of action to this effect.

Judging by several legal actions taken recently – and the speed at which it reacts (a looming election might have to do with that) – the Biden White House is very interested in making sure there are no hurdles to “communicating” with private social media companies.

The problem is that opponents see this as these companies being put under pressure to suppress or censor online content.

Some of those affected have challenged the practice in court – prompting the administration to counter this by seeking the dismissal of preliminary injunctions prohibiting collusive practices.

One such case is Kennedy v. Biden, a lawsuit alleging removal of content related to COVID topics brought by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and health professional Connie Sampognaro, who said their right to free speech had been violated.

The filing was granted a preliminary injunction (to prevent the administration and its agencies from continued alleged involvement in censorship) by a US district court in Louisiana.

Not only that, but Judge Terry A. Doughty stated in his decision that the injunction was needed as Kennedy was “likely to succeed in the merits of his claims.”

The injunction refers to the defendants: the White House, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the FBI, and is there to stop them from attempting to remove content by undertaking any kind of action to this effect.

Biden Admin Tries to Stop Anti-Censorship Injunction in Kennedy v. Biden Censorship Lawsuit

But earlier in the week the White House earlier went to the 5th Circuit US Court of Appeal filing an emergency motion only a day after the Louisiana court ruling. The goal was to dismiss the injunction. And the administration’s lawyers heavily refer to the Supreme Court ruling in Murthy v. Missouri.

After that decision, they said, Kennedy and others suing on similar grounds are “unlikely” to prevail in their legal battles anyway. Regarding the injunction, the government’s legal representatives called it “overbroad at a minimum” – and that’s – “in light of the Missouri case.”

In Murthy v. Missouri, the Supreme Court decided that those wishing to sue the Biden administration for collusion with social platforms had no standing to do so, with one of the justices, Amy Barrett, using a similar term – “overly broad assertion” – to describe the plaintiffs’ claims in that case.


EXCLUSIVE: Roger Stone Believes The Deep State May Assassinate Joe Biden


BLM Leader Admits He Was Wrong: “Democrats Want To Replace Us With Illegals”

BLM Leader Admits He Was Wrong: “Democrats Want To Replace Us With Illegals”

adminJul 12, 20241 min read

BLM Leader Admits He Was Wrong: “Democrats Want To Replace Us With Illegals”

Black Lives Matter leader Dr. Umar Rashad Ibn Abdullah-Johnson has warned that Democrats are trying to harm African Americans by replacing them with illegals. “When Joe Biden got elected he said he wanted to fast […]

The post BLM Leader Admits He Was Wrong: “Democrats Want To Replace Us With Illegals” appeared first on The People’s Voice.

Pelosi and Obama Plotting To Replace Biden With Michelle Obama

Pelosi and Obama Plotting To Replace Biden With Michelle Obama

adminJul 12, 20241 min read

Pelosi and Obama Plotting To Replace Biden With Michelle Obama

Barack Obama and Nancy Pelosi are secretly plotting to replace Joe Biden with Michelle Obama as the Democratic presidential nominee, according to Democrat party insiders. According to reports, Obama never thought Biden had the ability […]

The post Pelosi and Obama Plotting To Replace Biden With Michelle Obama appeared first on The People’s Voice.