News

Illegals found sitting inside brand new vehicle in train car

Federal authorities are praising U.S. Border Patrol (USBP) agents for ‘rescuing’ illegal aliens who were found hiding in train cars on multiple occasions this week.

On Tuesday morning, USBP agents from Cotulla Station in Laredo Sector found 23 illegals inside a locked train compartment.

“During their routine duties – and with temperatures reaching nearly 100 degrees yesterday – Border Patrol agents rescued 23 migrants from a locked train compartment who were put in a life-threatening situation by callous human smuggling organizations who prioritize profit over all else,” Laredo Sector Chief Jesse Munoz explained in a statement.

The illegals were identified as citizens of Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador.

None required medical treatment.

“Laredo Sector Border Patrol agents heroically rescued 23 migrants, including children, from a freight train in 100°F heat. These brave agents saved lives & exposed the cruelty of human smuggling organizations,” acting head of Customs and Border Protection Troy Miller wrote on social media.

On Friday morning, agents from the same station discovered another group of illegals hiding in a locked train car containing new vehicles.

In total, 20 citizens of Mexico and Guatemala were pulled out of the compartment and found to be in good health.

Incredibly, photographs indicate some of the illegals were found sitting inside a brand new vehicle being brought into the U.S.

Chaos unfolds constantly along the U.S.-Mexico border, as Infowars regularly reports.

---

Elon Musk Exposes Secret Illegal Global Censorship System

---

Dan Lyman on X | Gab

---

Insists Joe Biden was in “good form” during a one-on-one meeting between the leaders Thursday.

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer dodged questions about Joe Biden’s age and declining mental acuity during a CNN interview Friday, saying it is up to American voters to decide their president.

CNN’s Jake Tapper asked Starmer, who became the newly-elected prime minister of the United Kingdom earlier this month, whether he believed 80 years was too old for someone to serve as U.S. president.

“Obviously, in America, it’s for the American people to decide who they want to be their president,” Starmer replied.

Starmer also claimed Biden was in “good form” when the two met earlier this week.

“We were billed for 45 minutes. We probably went on for the best part of an hour. Covered a lot of ground. And, he was in good form,” Starmer said.

Tapper also asked Starmer if he endorsed Biden for president, noting the U.K. leader told Politico in 2023 that a second Trump term would not be his “desired outcome.”

“I am a progressive, and we’re sister parties with the Democrats. But I’ve also been really clear that I will work with whoever the American people decide to elect as their president. That’s what you would expect — and it is for the American people to decide,” Starmer replied.

Biden continued to raise concerns among Democrats over his mental fitness after his disastrous NATO press conference on Thursday, where he referred to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky as Russian President Vladimir Putin and his VP Kamala Harris as “Vice President Trump.”

The press conference was so bad that the largest super PAC supporting Biden’s presidential campaign froze approximately $90 million in pledged donations unless the Democrat Party substitutes Sleepy Joe as its candidate.

---

Geoengineering has the potential to cause unprecedented ecological disaster

If you think things are mad already when it comes to climate change, just wait. You ain’t seen nothin’ yet.

Some events of recent weeks:

1. Within days of winning the British general election, the new Labour government announces a total ban on all new drilling for oil in the North Sea.
2. The government of Denmark approves an annual tax for farmers of hundreds of dollars per cow to offset the emissions they produce. The tax will be introduced in 2030.
3. Scientists from the University of Chicago and Stanford tell the world, in a new white paper, that urgent research needs to be conducted into glacial geoengineering to prevent Arctic and Antarctic ice sheets from melting. They propose, among other things, anchoring giant “curtains” to the seafloor to prevent warmer water from undermining ice sheets, and drilling huge holes in them, right down to the glacier bed, to allow meltwater streams to be redirected and preserve the ice.

Last year we were told, by UN secretary general António Guterres, that the world has entered the era of “global boiling.” Global warming is now officially over. 

This is hysterical language. It bears no relation whatsoever to most people’s experience of the weather. It’s mid-July and it might as well be February here in England. Frankly, I pray for global boiling when all I really want to do is get some sun on my wedding tackle and jump in the sea. But the English summer is the English summer. Always has been, always will be.

None of this matters, though, because the climate cult operates according to a logic that is totally its own and amenable in no obvious way to inputs that don’t conform in the most circular way to its own presuppositions and strictures. That’s why it’s a cult.

As we near 2030, and it becomes certain that the world’s nations will not reach their emissions-reductions targets as set out in the Paris Climate Accords, we can expect the hysteria to get so much worse. We’re already being told that catastrophic climate change is now unavoidable, and that billions of people will be on the move in the coming decades. Some are even saying that these billions should be welcomed to the West now, in advance of the chaos. This is so-called “climate migration,” and it’s going to dominate discussion of the potential effects of climate change very soon. The new hard-left coalition that controls French politics has already demanded that Macron make the effects of climate change a legitimate reason for migrants from anywhere in the world to come to France.

The consequences of the measures I listed at the beginning of the piece, or at least the first two, are pretty clear. The phasing out of fossil fuels will make Western economies poorer and less productive. People will have to adjust their lives to rolling blackouts, to not heating their homes in the winter and to using antiquated public transport instead of their beloved cars. Western governments, for whatever reason, will continue the South Africanisation of our nations, even as massively polluting countries like India and China continue building oil-, gas- and coal-fired power stations at a rate that cancels out everything they do.

Taxes on animal emissions will force small farmers out of business. Those small farmers who remain will be forced to diversify into landscape management, planting forests and acting as glorified stewards of the land, rather than real farmers. Big corporations will move in and capture the food supply at last, completing a process that has been ongoing for the last century and resulted in unparalleled ill health and loss of freedom through dependency on medicine and the products of Big Pharma. We will all eat less meat and dairy products, maybe even none at all, and be reduced to a uniform standard of weakness unseen in our history as a species.

When it comes to geoengineering, though, we simply don’t have a clue. Nothing like it has ever been tried. That’s what makes it so incredibly dangerous.  

Until recently, geoengineering was the preserve of eccentric cranks. Scientists knew that the climate is an extraordinarily complex system, and that any human intervention to modify it is likely to prove clumsy at best and to have unintended consequences that could be disastrous and irreversible at worst.

In their capacity as advisors to government, scientists told our rulers this, and any discussion of its potential uses was left in the realms of science fiction where it belonged.

So when somebody like Russ George came along in 2012 and took it upon himself to dump hundreds of tons of iron sulfate in the waters off British Columbia, hoping to create a giant carbon sink, he was roundly condemned for his absurd recklessness; although he somehow managed to escape prosecution. He should have been made an example of.

Now, however, a little over a decade later, scientists and government have lost all their qualms. Huge amounts of money are pouring in to geoengineering research across the globe, and small-scale pilot projects are already taking place, with the aim to scale them up very soon and unleash them on the world.

In February, The Wall Street Journal published a detailed report on three ongoing important geoengineering projects taking place, with a mixture of government and private funding.

In Australia, researchers from Southern Cross University are releasing a brine mixture into the sky to create larger, brighter clouds that will reflect more sunlight and reduce local temperatures. The project is funded by the Australian government, universities, and conservation organizations.

In Israel, Stardust Solutions is testing a delivery system to disperse reflective particles at high altitudes, again to reduce solar radiation. The startup is testing the system indoors but will move to outdoor tests in the “next few months.”

And in the US, the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute plans to add 6,000 gallons of sodium hydroxide to the ocean off Martha’s Vineyard. Like Russ George, they want to produce a carbon sink that sucks carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere and into the sea, storing it there. The U.S. government and private sources fund the project. The release of the chemical will require further approval from the Environmental Protection Agency.

Of course, scientists still know that the climate is an enormously complex system, far beyond our full comprehension—they know this, primarily, because their own models have so far predicted Jack sh*t—but now they’re saying the benefits of geoengineering outweigh the risks. How they’ve reached this conclusion is anybody’s guess, since they can’t predict the effects of climate change or of geoengineering experiments.

Ultimately, it seems, we’re just supposed to Trust the Science. Where have we heard that before?

If we are to prevent ecological disaster on an unprecedented scale, we need to get a handle on geoengineering, and we need to do it now. Tennessee, at least, has enacted a ban on geoengineering within its state territory, but that’s nowhere near enough. We don’t just need state bans: we need national and international bans.

So far, the only determined and successful pushback against the climate cult on the international stage came under President Donald Trump, who pulled the US out of the Paris Climate Accords and increased domestic production of energy sources tremendously. Trump has already promised to pull the US out of the Paris Accords for a second time if he wins this November.

Trump’s climate agenda, such as it is, should include strong anti-geoengineering provisions. His administration should make clear that any decision taken to geoengineer the earth’s climate is a decision taken on behalf of the US and its citizens by a foreign power, and that, under an America First policy, is a hostile act. Countries who do geoengineering should be treated as enemies. Startups and corporations and activists who do it—and believe me, activists are going to try it—should be treated as international terrorists. No exceptions.

By the climate cultists’ own admission, the planet is our common inheritance. And that’s exactly where the fightback against this reckless nonsense should begin—before it’s too late.

---

BREAKING: Biden And Obama Locked In Blackmail War, Says Trump Insider

---

Alex Jones breaks down how law-abiding citizens are subjected to TSA harassment while illegal aliens with no ID can fly anywhere in the U.S.

Alex Jones reports from the Austin airport to break down the glaring double standard and hypocrisy of the Transportation Safety Administration (TSA) with the wide open border.

Jones described how TSA officers singled out him and his family and pulled them aside for enhanced screening, even grilling his 7-year-old daughter.

While US Border Is Wide Open, TSA Expands Internal Checkpoints

Alex Jones Reports pic.twitter.com/6MrKTXsxCy

— Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) July 13, 2024

The TSA just questioned my seven-year-old daughter about her intentions to fly while the border is wide open. This country is a joke of a police state. https://t.co/ipJUtBZB8v

— Erika Wulff Jones (@WulffJones) July 13, 2024

Meanwhile, the border is wide open and the TSA has even created special queues for illegal aliens with no forms of identification whatsoever to fast-track them to fly anywhere they wish in the U.S.

Another immigration line in a separate terminal instructing non-US citizens only to enter there. pic.twitter.com/yPWxMQHzrR

— Bill Melugin (@BillMelugin_) December 23, 2023

Some airports have even created makeshift migrant shelters, placing illegal aliens in hidden rooms guarded by a U.S. service members while they wait to be flown off to anywhere in the country.

And hundreds of thousands of children are being trafficked across the southern border at taxpayer expense, according to Congressional reports.

While the TSA is busy harassing law-abiding American citizens with security theater, they roll out the red carpet for law-breaking illegal aliens who have no forms of identification.

They hate you pic.twitter.com/fBqpSfW9JF

— infra ?️⌛️ (@infraa_) July 13, 2024

Democrats have supported open borders for so long it’s become an open joke that the TSA security harassment and immigration checks at the airport is way worse compared to the red carpet welcome illegals get at the southern border. pic.twitter.com/mj2M3fnWKY

— ?? Deep₿lueCrypto ?? (@DeepBlueCrypto) February 24, 2024

Traveled by plane this week, took hours to get through security. Bunch of nasty tsa agents. This country so effed up.. Next time I will come via the open border, get some $$ cards and maybe a free hotel.. pic.twitter.com/YWTze57Oqe

— Deegert (@deegert_debbie) April 26, 2024

Instead they grope your kids, while the feds smuggle kids for sex slavery across the border. https://t.co/iZPIsobRyo

— Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) July 13, 2024

TSA for Inside America versus the Biden Open Border telling CBP to stand down & threatening Texas, TX National Guard & TX Militias.?

Make it make sense.

Vote Trump and he will enforce the laws on the book day 1 & support our Border States! pic.twitter.com/Blq5uiyOOG

— Jessico Bowman (@JessicoBowman) January 30, 2024

⁦@elonmusk⁩ ⁦@MarioNawfal⁩ ⁦@WholeMarsBlog⁩ can we take our TSA agents to help slow the border flow? I mean what’s the point of a TSA agent with borders open like a flood??? pic.twitter.com/YyC7aW9laK

— Edward S… (@EdwadSouth) September 29, 2023

Airport Security vs Border Security ?

Does this make any sense to you?

Welcome to Biden’s America.#Biden #Border #Texas #invasion #BorderCrisis

pic.twitter.com/jHGeGJiAM3

— Peter McConeghy (@petersthoughts) February 7, 2024

---

Follow Jamie White on X | Truth | Gab | Gettr | Minds

With the Washinton and Brussels establishment apparently only interested in more bloodshed, someone has to speak sense.

One of the greatest farces of these modern times is that those who scream the loudest about democracy and human rights are the very same people who violate international norms at every opportunity.

In the June issue of The New Republic, a left-leaning US political journal, a scowling Donald Trump was featured on the cover sporting a Hitler moustache above a caption that read: “American fascism, what it would look like.”

“We chose the cover image, based on a well-known 1932 Hitler campaign poster, for a precise reason: that anyone transported back to 1932 Germany could very, very easily have explained away Herr Hitler’s excesses and been persuaded that his critics were going overboard,” the editors explained in a post on X (formerly Twitter). “After all, [Hitler] spent 1932 campaigning, negotiating, doing interviews – being a mostly normal politician. But he and his people vowed all along that they would use the tools of democracy to destroy it, and it was only after he was given power that Germany saw his movement’s full face.”

We chose the cover image, based on a well-known 1932 Hitler campaign poster, for a precise reason: that anyone transported back to 1932 Germany could very, very easily have explained away Herr Hitler’s excesses and been persuaded that his critics were going overboard. After all,… pic.twitter.com/x79Rkh86O1

— The New Republic (@newrepublic) July 7, 2024

There’s just one problem with the journal’s nervous handwringing: Trump has already served a four-year term as US leader and there was no visible sign of fascist goosestepping down Main Street during that period. In fact, just the opposite is true. While Adolf Hitler invaded Poland on September 1, 1939, thus triggering World War II, Trump went down in the history books as the first American commander-in-chief in modern times to avoid a military conflict. Now on the campaign trail for the second time, with the insatiable defense industry licking its chops for more profits, the Republican frontrunner has declared he would end the Ukraine-Russia conflict in 24 hours if reelected.

When it is considered that ‘democracy’ today primarily works on behalf of the military industrial complex and other associated business interests, it is easier to understand how Trump is described in the corporate-owned media as an existential threat to the American republic. Peace is the last thing on Washington’s mind, and Russia understands that better than any country.

Back in 2008, the “dictator” Vladimir Putin delivered his now-famous speech at the Munich Security Conference where he warned his Western colleagues on the dangers of military expansion.

“NATO expansion… represents a serious provocation that reduces the level of mutual trust. And we have the right to ask: against whom is this expansion intended? And what happened to the assurances our Western partners made after the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact? Where are those declarations today? No one even remembers them.”

Despite Putin’s explicit warning, NATO went on to add an additional six members to the alliance, bringing the total number to 32, with Ukraine, ignoring Moscow’s major red line, scheming to be number 33. For anybody who asserts this is only a “defense alliance” would do well to consider what America’s response would be if all of Latin America and the border state of Mexico were joining a military alliance led by Moscow. Needless to say, we would be knee-deep in bloodshed by now. Yet Russia is supposed to accept an endless military incursion smack up against its border.

This was certainly not the last time Russia attempted to broker a peace deal with Washington. Almost eight years after the 2014 Maidan Revolution, and months before Moscow kicked off its special military operation in Ukraine, the Kremlin released its plan for peace on the continent. Among other things, the draft treaty called for the US and Russia to refrain from deploying troops in regions where they could be perceived as a threat to each other’s national security, as well as a ban on sending their troops and military hardware into areas where they could strike each other’s territory. The treaty was also designed to ban the deployment of intermediate-range missiles in Europe. Had the Western powers consented to the plan – it barely made headlines in the NATO countries – it’s not difficult to imagine decades of peace between east and west, the very last thing that Washington wants.

Instead, the US and its European puppets placed Russia in an impossible position with regards to the ongoing militarization and Nazification of Ukraine, forcing it to respond as any other country concerned about its national security would.

This leads us to the West’s third favorite bogeyman, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, who has dared to declare that his country is predominantly Christian and conservative and has every right to stay that way. Orban, whose country now holds the rotating EU Council presidency, went on a peace-making tour with stops in Moscow, Kiev, Beijing, and Washington (where he ruffled more than one hawk’s feathers by visiting Trump at Mar-a-Lago instead of Biden in DC). The frustration on the part of Brussels as it watched the Hungarian “tyrant” speak out in favor of reducing weapons sales was laughable if not downright pathetic.

“Hungary has presented the trips as a ‘peace mission’ to help negotiate a ceasefire for the war in Ukraine. Orban may consider himself as one of the few who can speak to both sides – but in reality he has no mandate to do so,” wrote Armida van Rij, a senior research fellow at Chatham House, a European think tank. The question remains, however, who will speak out on behalf of peace if not Trump, Putin, and Orban? The answer thus far is nobody.

While there are certainly other statesmen besides Trump, Putin, and Orban on the international stage who can make the case for peace, time is running out to hear those critical voices.

---

VIDEO: Climate Doomsayers Have Been Wrong About Everything For 50 Years

Alex Jones lays out how the climate alarmists have been wrong about every predictive climate change model over the last 50 years, but sadly have no plans to stop fear mongering anytime soon.

VIDEO: Climate Doomsayers Have Been Wrong About Everything For 50 Years pic.twitter.com/5Hdp2E6P8H

— Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) July 12, 2024

---