News

Jones delivers a sneak peek at the upcoming interview.

Infowars host Alex Jones joins an X Spaces discussion with Kim Dotcom, Jackson Hinkle and Brian Krassenstein regarding Tucker Carlson’s forthcoming interview with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Click below to hear the X Spaces discussion.

---

---

‘The events were shameful criminal violence, all of those things, but did not qualify as insurrection as that term is used in Section Three,’ Trump lawyer educates SCOTUS justice.

A Trump attorney shot down DEI SCOTUS Justice Kentanji Brown Jackson’s support of false claims made in Colorado’s petition to remove Trump from the state’s ballot, rejecting a characterization that the Jan. 6 riot constituted an “insurrection.”

Watch the clip in question:

---

---

Joe Biden “willfully retained” classified documents in his residential house according to Special Counsel Robert Hur’s report, but the 81-year-old Democrat avoided charges for mishandling classified documents because he is a “well-meaning, elderly man with […]

The post Biden Too Senile To Face Classified Docs Charges: ‘Well-Meaning, Elderly Man With a Poor Memory’ appeared first on The People’s Voice.

Documents state Biden didn’t know what years he served as vice president or what year his son Beau died.

Special Counsel Robert Hur’s report investigating Joe Biden for illegally keeping classified documents at his Delaware home and separate private office has been released, and Biden will not be charged with any crime.

The documents shockingly admit Joe Biden’s memory is kaput and even use his fragile mental state as an excuse not to press felony charges.

The actual special counsel report states, “Mr. Biden’s memory also appeared to have significant limitations – both at the time he spoke to Zwonitzer in 2017, as evidenced by their recorded conversations, and today, as evidenced by his recorded interview with our office.”

The official paper says Biden’s conversations were “painfully slow” and that he was “struggling to remember events and straining at times to read and relay his own notebook entries.”

“In his interview with our office, Mr. Biden’s memory was worse,” the special counsel continued. “He did not remember when he was vice president, forgetting on the first day of the interview when his term ended (‘if it was 2013 – when did I stop being Vice President?‘), and forgetting on the second day of the interview when his term began (‘in 2009, am I still Vice President?‘).”

“He did not remember, even within several years, when his son Beau died. And his memory appeared hazy when describing the Afghanistan debate that was once so important to him. Among other things, he mistakenly said he “had a real difference” of opinion with General Karl Eikenberry, when, in fact, Eikenberry was an ally whom Mr. Biden cited approvingly in his Thanksgiving memo to President Obama.”

The special counsel also claimed they thought a jury would likely be too sympathetic to Biden because he is “an elderly man with a poor memory.”

“Based on our direct interactions with and observations of him [Biden], he is someone for whom many jurors will want to identify reasonable doubt. It would be difficult to convince a jury that they should convict him – by then a former president will into his eighties – of a serious felony that requires a mental state of willfulness.“

According to evidence, Biden “willfully retained marked classified documents about Afghanistan and unmarked classified handwritten notes in his notebooks, both of which he stored in unsecured places in his home.”

It’s worth noting Joe shared that home with his crackhead son Hunter Biden who has said he was in business with the “fucking spy chief of China,” which is a massive national security problem.

Admitting Biden kept the classified documents at his home in unsecured places is also an admission that he violated the law as the vice president is not allowed to do such a thing.

Meanwhile, President Donald Trump is still facing a 40-count indictment for keeping classified docs in a secured room at his Mar-a-Lago mansion.

Of course, the U.S. President is allowed to keep such information according to the law.

The two-tiered injustice system is openly destroying America, but at least it’s waking up the masses at ludicrous speed.

---

Justice Thomas proved case has no merit simply by asking for previous historical examples.

US Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas decimated a liberal Colorado lawyer’s argument for removing Donald Trump from the state’s ballot simply by asking him to provide one example of this previously happening throughout history.

The incident unfolded Thursday as the Supreme Court took up the case weighing the merits of the state’s removal of Trump for supposedly inciting an insurrection on Jan. 6.

During oral arguments Justice Thomas repeatedly asked Colorado attorney Jason Murray to provide historical examples of national candidates ever being disqualified by the states, which the attorney admitted he was unable to provide.

Justice Thomas asked whether disqualification of a candidate happened during, or after the Civil War or Reconstruction – when it would have made more sense.

“There were a plethora of Confederates still around. There were any number of people who would continue to either run for state offices or national offices. So it seemed it that would suggest that they would at least be a few examples of national candidates being disqualified,” noted Justice Thomas.

Murray attempted to claim the US Congress had previously disqualified candidates by refusing to seat them, however, Justice Thomas pointed out this was not the same as the states disqualifying a candidate.

“So what’s the purpose of Section 3?” Thomas asked, adding, “The states were sending people [to Congress] that the concern was that the former Confederate states would continue being bad actors and the effort was to prevent them from doing this, and you’re saying that, ‘Well, this also authorized states to disqualify candidates.’ So, what I’m asking you for, if you are right, what are the examples?”

This time, Murray attempted to claim states had indeed previously precluded candidates from holding — state positions.

“I understand the states controlling state elections and state positions,” Thomas replied, adding, “What we are talking about here are national candidates.”

Again, Murray was unable to provide an example.

At this point, Chief Justice John Roberts stepped in to clarify Justice Thomas’ issue, highlighting that while states were bound by the 14th Amendment to ensure equal protection under the law, it did not allow states to govern how national presidential elections are run.

Here’s a longer clip of the brutal takedown:

Justice Thomas was lauded on social media for dismantling the liberal attorney’s claims.

Warning, graphic language — Viewer discretion advised:

---

The globalists are increasing their attacks on Infowars and the stakes have never been higher!

Please consider donating and visit InfowarsStore.com for merch, nutraceuticals and survival gear.

---

Follow the author on X, Facebook, Gab, Minds, Truth Social and Gettr.

---

---

Why does the establishment continuously let child predators off the hook?

Harrison Smith covered a disturbing story on The American Journal Thursday, describing an alleged sexual assault of a baby at a daycare.

---