RFK Jr. Apologizes For Leaked Video Of Call Between Him & Trump
US presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has apologized after his son posted a video recording of a recent phone conversation he had with Donald Trump Footage of him talking on the phone with the […]
The post RFK Jr. Apologizes For Leaked Video Of Call Between Him & Trump appeared first on The People’s Voice.
WARNING: Democrats Are Positioning Saboteurs In Trump Camp To Execute False Flag Attacks
Former US Army Special Operations Officer & Psychological Warfare Analyst Scott Bennett joined Alex Jones Tuesday to raise alarm on what to expect regarding President Trump’s safety in the near future:
RELATED: Inside Job? Rep. Tells CNN Trump Assassination Attempt Was ‘Intentional’
Share on X:
WARNING: Democrats Are Positioning Saboteurs In Trump Camp To Execute False Flag Attacks pic.twitter.com/rQVYuiLFlQ
— Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) July 16, 2024
Don’t miss:
MUST-SEE: U.S Rep. & Sniper Expert Says Trump Shooter Cleary Didn’t Act Alone— Inside Job
BOMBSHELL: Secret Service Told To Stand Down In Butler, Pennsylvania, Says Trump Event Head
Man Wearing “Where is Epstein Client List?” Shirt Photobombs CNN Live Shot
CNN unintentionally broadcast questions concerning deceased pedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s client list when a man stepped into a live shot.
Filming at Day 2 of the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee, Wisc., on Tuesday, a man wearing a shirt reading “WHERE IS THE JEFFREY EPSTEIN CLIENT LIST?” stepped into frame as a correspondent was giving a live report.
OMG!!!??? pic.twitter.com/mstsJUm9Jl
— il Donaldo Trumpo (@PapiTrumpo) July 16, 2024
The man’s stunt is reminiscent of the Infowars contest run ahead of the 2016 election that called on viewers to photobomb live media shots wearing a Bill Clinton “Rape” shirt and while saying, “Bill Clinton is a rapist, Infowars.com.”
Former Snipers Agree: It’s A Miracle Trump Is Still Alive
One of the more interesting aspects in the flood of analysis on the attempted Trump assassination is the commentary by former military and SWAT snipers experienced in providing security details for political figures. Nearly all of them confirm that the Secret Service surveillance planning during the Butler, PA rally was perhaps the worst they have ever seen. It was so bad, in fact, that it almost appears as if the massive holes in the perimeter were deliberate.
So far it is not clear who specifically was in charge of the security plans for that event. However, many former snipers agree that it’s a miracle Donald Trump is still alive. In fact, they agree almost entirely with our own analysis published on July 15th.
RELATED: Video Graphic Shows How Close President Trump Came to Losing His Life
In an interview with KJRH in Oklahoma, former SWAT sniper Maj. Nate Norton of the Sapulpa Police Department lays out the scary reality:
“I’m glad they’re calling him a shooter because he ain’t a sniper,” Norton said. “If he was a sniper, President Trump would be dead on the very first shot. There’s no ifs, ands, or buts about this. This is somebody that has some weird, sick agenda and did at best mediocre train(ing) in my opinion. Because at 130 yards, 190 yards, that is piece of cake gravy range for somebody that shoots.”
The 140 yard shot gift-wrapped and handed to alleged shooter Thomas Crooks was so easy, even for an amateur, that Trump should not be alive today. The bullet, reportedly fired from an AR15 running 5.56 (or .223 ammunition), would have left a deadly and expansive impact wound had it been less than an inch to the shooter’s right. Here is test footage of .223 rounds impacting a realistic ballistic gel head for a visual reference:
Multiple experts in the sniping arena have noted that the miss might have been some kind of divine intervention. In the below interview, Republican representative and former sniper Cory Mills outlines his take on the attack on the assumption that the shooter’s range was 230 yards. Crooks was actually much closer.
RELATED: Inside Job? Rep. Tells CNN Trump Assassination Attempt Was ‘Intentional’
The explanation for Thomas Crooks miraculous miss might be found in reports that Crooks was, in fact, a verified terrible shot. Investigations into his school history indicate that Crooks tried to join his High School Shooting Club in Bethel Park, but he failed to make the shooting team and was asked to leave the club because he was incredibly unsafe with his rifle.
In other words, Trump lucked out with the worst assassin possible. This does not take away from the fact that Crooks was somehow allowed to casually approach the AGR building and climb to the roof with a rifle only 140 yards away from the rally stage without any intervention from Secret Service. Crooks had every card stacked in his favor. Why was there no security on that roof? We are still waiting for answers.
MUST-SEE: U.S Rep. & Sniper Expert Says Trump Shooter Cleary Didn’t Act Alone— Inside Job
BOMBSHELL: Secret Service Told To Stand Down In Butler, Pennsylvania, Says Trump Event Head
Anime Transforms Trump into Legend, as Protective Spirit Blocks Assassin’s Bullet
A video produced by Japanese animators shows a spirit protecting former President Donald Trump from an assassin’s bullet, in an anime inspired by this past weekend’s near-fatal shooting.
Trump becomes an anime legend after surviving assassination attempt ?? ?? pic.twitter.com/ta0nPtWK1U
— Tommy Robinson ?? (@TRobinsonNewEra) July 16, 2024
The video shows a patriotic spirit surrounding Trump before the would-be assassin takes aim, but right as the bullet is about to strike, the protector blocks it mere inches from Trump’s head.
“Trump becomes an anime legend after surviving assassination attempt,” summarized Tommy Robinson on X.
The animation immortalizes the miraculous moment Trump unintentionally dodged a bullet that would have otherwise ended his life, and cements his status a legend.
Trump plays Neo from the matrix.
— Jedi Hill (@AlchemistJedi) July 16, 2024
Video analysis of the shooting.
This is We the People solving the crime so it can’t end up buried like the JFK assassination.
We must remove the traders from within the federal government@realDonaldTrump @TFL1728 @Sorenthek pic.twitter.com/H2bpgjy4H2
Propaganda: How The Media Handles Biden’s Rapid Decline And The Trump Shooting
In a much younger life, I was a newspaper reporter. A journalism-school graduate, I was going to help change the world, proclaiming truth and justice under my byline. The job didn’t pay much, but with overtime we got by, and it was a heady experience for this young general assignment reporter to rub shoulders with politicians and celebrities and even have some of them return his phone calls.
Later in life, I had a long academic career in economics. I came to understand the mentality that has affected modern journalism for more than a century, and I believe that what we have seen in the past 25 years is the inevitable result of what happens when progressivism takes over.
Twenty years ago, I wrote in a Mises Wire piece that modern media was a Progressive-era relic that was imploding, and that implosion continues apace today. Since I wrote that article, the mainstream media has run over the cliff many times: in their coverage of the Duke lacrosse case, of covid-19 and its aftermath, and now of President Joe Biden’s dementia. In each of these cases, the news coverage has tried to protect a progressive narrative and cast aside that inconvenient thing we call truth.
I was directly involved in the Duke case and saw firsthand how the media, led by The New York Times, stuck to the narrative that three Duke University lacrosse players raped a black stripper even when the combination of logic and DNA science proved otherwise. When North Carolina’s attorney general investigated and declared the players innocent, most of the media quietly accepted the verdict and moved on. Several years later, journalists tried to resurrect the story. William Cohan’s lauded book claimed the story was more complicated (maybe there really was a rape, but we’ll never know). But the book was riddled with errors. (The book review in The New York Times also was full of errors. They never learned nor did they care.)
The Duke case solidified my view that the modern progressive media is worse than useless. For all its braying that it is “protecting democracy,” our media today does nothing more than protect progressive narratives. Journalists wanted to believe that those dastardly Duke lacrosse athletes beat and raped a black woman because, after all, two white men murdered Emmett Till in Mississippi in 1955. (A Duke history professor wrote an op-ed to that point, and the press ate it up.)
The covid-19 coverage also followed the progressive narrative that truth comes primarily from progressive state-sponsored authorities, even when the truth consists of contradictory accounts. The dominant progressive narratives were that Anthony Fauci and Francis Collins spoke ex cathedra and that their pronouncements represented the very best of that holy concept known as science. Only later did Fauci admit that social distancing was not based on science. When a federal judge ended President Biden’s mask mandate in 2022, the legacy media predicted mass infections that never materialized. In the end, progressive narratives overpowered real medical science, but by then, the media had moved on to other things.
The media turns on Biden
A few days before the disastrous presidential debate in late June, The New York Times published an article claiming that published recordings of the president having serious memory lapses and worse were “misleading videos“ created by dishonest conservatives. After the debate, however, the NYT made a seamless pivot to demanding that Biden drop out of the presidential race due to his obvious diminished capacity.
If there ever was a “We have always been at war with Eastasia” moment, here it is. And not only did the NYT turn on a dime, but it has been publishing a number of op-eds by prominent people (like actor and Democratic Party activist George Clooney) to help push Biden out the door. Suddenly, the NYT has “discovered” what has been obvious even to casual observers for many years: Joe Biden is suffering from dementia and clearly is not mentally fit to be president.
One can accuse the NYT and other progressive media of hypocrisy and outright lying, but hypocrisy and outright lying have been a staple of progressive news coverage for years. This latest episode, while quite revealing, should not surprise anyone who follows American legacy journalism with any regularity.
When we see the progressive media having its “war with Eastasia” moments, the patterns always are the same. First, the media jumps in with both feet on something that fits a progressive narrative and ignores anything that might “cloud their vision.” In the Duke case, for example, almost none of the media claims in the first few weeks were true, including the accusation that the lacrosse team had put up a “wall of silence.”
When the DNA tests that the infamous prosecutor Michael Nifong claimed would reveal the alleged rapists came back negative, the NYT trotted out Peter Neufeld, co-founder of the Innocence Project, to declare that DNA was irrelevant. (The Innocence Project puts DNA evidence front and center to gain exonerations of wrongfully convicted people, but when media progressives wanted the lacrosse players to be guilty, all science went out the window.)
The NYT propped up the false case against the three accused lacrosse players for nearly a year despite the mountain of exculpatory evidence, promoting its progressive narrative against all science and reason.
Likewise, the NYT and its allied media pursued a political narrative on covid, ignoring sound epidemiology and medical science — all in the name of science.
Once a narrative has been proven false, one might expect a mea culpa from mainstream journalists. Think again. They simply move on. After its disastrous Duke coverage, the NYT basically congratulated itself on its coverage. There was no false narrative, only first-rate journalism.
It would seem relevant to the assassination attempt against Donald Trump that President Biden recently called for placing Trump “in a bullseye.” After all, seven years ago, the NYT blamed Sarah Palin for the assassination attempt against Democratic Rep. Gabby Giffords of Arizona because Palin in a political document placed a printed target on Giffords’ congressional district. The newspaper later put a small correction in its editorial, but it was too little, too late.
Will the media look inward this time? After all, we have been reading in the mainstream press that Donald Trump is the latest incarnation of Adolph Hitler and that he will impose a dictatorship if elected. Law professor Jonathan Turley has highlighted a number of similar claims by the media, including that Trump will unleash “death squads” on political opponents if elected.
One recalls that Trump already served four years as president and did not impose a dictatorship nor send out death squads to kill Democrats or recalcitrant Republicans. Not that it really matters to mainstream journalists. As we have seen, once their narratives are upended, their rallying cry is the equivalent of telling us we’ve always been “at war with Eastasia.”
BOMBSHELL: Secret Service Told To Stand Down In Butler, Pennsylvania, Says Trump Event Head