Civilisational Decline and Its Discontents
There is a word that keeps cropping up in our attempt to describe the moment we are living through: civilisation. Something isn’t right at a civilisational level. But what even is civilisation? What makes a civilisation great, lasting, robust, or advanced?
In Civilisation and Its Discontents, Sigmund Freud identifies beauty, cleanliness, order, scientific and artistic achievement, the regulation of social relationships, the rule of law, and a control over the forces of nature as some of the main markers of civilisation. At first glance, this all sounds pretty desirable, and we may rush to lament the slow demise of many of these attributes in the civilisation that our discourse is most concerned with: Western civilisation. It is the West that now celebrates ugliness in art, architecture, fashion, and the human form. Simple beauty, it seems, is too obvious, too elitist, unfair, and lacks the cynical irony of postmodernism. Cleanliness and order are being lost to an increasingly multicultural, atomised, and low-trust society, where we simply take what we need in the short-term without considering its broader effects on social cohesion or community. There is also a feeling of stagnation, exhaustion, and apathy.
As Peter Thiel has been highlighting, scientific advancement is no longer progressing and hasn’t done so for the last 50 years. In the arts, there is a curious mix of extreme relativism and dogmatic censorship. Anything can be accepted as art while any art that challenges woke DEI shibboleths will never be accepted. Similarly, institutions like marriage and the family are increasingly failing and breaking down, while the relationship between the sexes and races is becoming more and more antagonistic and fraught. Meanwhile, the increased politicisation of the courts, the use of lawfare, lockdowns, and increasingly subjective legal frameworks like ‘hate speech’ laws—all leave us feeling like freedom and justice are slipping away. And, despite the efficiency we gain from smartphones and social media, we don’t seem to be happier. In fact, rates of depression and anxiety are soaring.
Freud’s original title for his essay was something approximating the English for ‘unhappiness’ in civilisation. Why, then, would civilisation make us unhappy? According to Freud, in order for the individual to participate in and benefit from all that civilisation has to offer, sexuality and aggression have to be sacrificed and repressed. Put simply, civilisation requires that there be things that we ought and ought not to do. Certain categories of behaviour are considered either unlawful, sinful, unacceptable, shameful, inappropriate, or inconsiderate. There are things that are considered uncivilised. Transgressions in thought, word, or deed would necessarily be accompanied, therefore, by feelings of guilt. For Freud, guilt was the biggest problem of civilisation and the cause of much misery, malaise, and anxiety. It is when the frustrations and expectations of civilisation become too much that people become sad and neurotic. Writing in the 1930s, Freud was emphasising the problem of guilt at a time when the full horrors of the 20th century—of Nazism, fascism, and communism—had not yet been fully realised. If we were guilty about our secret bad thoughts or aggressive urges, the 20th century showed us how truly destructive our aggression can be—and it was beyond our worst nightmares.
Godwin’s Law—“as an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler increases”—doesn’t just describe the ease with which we reach for immature ad hominem. It identifies something much more profound: the guilt that Freud identified now finds its foundation in a horrifying origin story that is so apocalyptic in its proportions that it paralyses us and seems insurmountable. As historian Tom Holland put, we spent two thousand years basing our morality on what Jesus would do. Instead, we now ask what the Nazis would do, and then do the opposite. Good and evil are now defined in terms of their proximity to Hitler. Where does this leave the concept of civilisation? How could the country that produced Bach and Beethoven commit acts of such cruelty? How could a highly civilised Europe behave with such savagery? If you stare at civilisation long enough, does barbarism stare back?
Attempting to define civilisation in his 1969 documentary of the same name, Kenneth Clarke settles for “I know it when I see it.” A strange adage to opt for given that this was said not long after the U.S. supreme court justice, Potter Stewart, described the threshold for obscenity in relation to pornography in exactly the same way. Indeed, the relationship between civilisation and pornography is an interesting one. Very recently, a remote Amazonian tribe was given access to the Elon Musk funded internet provider, StarLink. It is estimated that there are between 100 to 200 uncontacted tribes globally, numbering up to 10,000 individuals who have never known civilisation as we know it, let alone its most advanced technological developments.
Interestingly, while the Amazonian tribe initially found internet access to be of benefit in calling for help or communicating with distant family members, it didn’t take long before young members of the tribe started sharing pornography in group chats, leading to a sudden rise in aggressive sexual behaviour in young males. In other words, Elon Musk, the current apex predator of Western civilisation, made a primitive society more uncivilised, not less so. It should be said that not long after this story was reported, the leader of the tribe took to Instagram to denounce the story as “fake news”—and in doing so ironically added, rather than detracted, from the sense that they had been corrupted by the ways of the West even more so than was reported.
It is this idea that the primitive nature of such tribes may be preferable to our own advanced civilisation that continually makes us doubt ourselves. Clarke describes the enemies of civilisation as being fear, boredom, and a loss of confidence, with an emphasis on the latter. We lose our confidence in confronting, for example, Islamism and sudden bursts of antisemitism from people who seemingly hate the West. In other words, the enemies of Western civilisation come from inside just as much as they do from outside. This is what makes it increasingly difficult to distinguish civilisation from savagery: elements of both lie intermingled in our midst.
If we were to hear of a remote tribe that ritualistically sacrificed some of its adolescents and attempted to stop them becoming adults by poisoning their bodies, and then mutilating their breasts and genitalia in the service of a magical belief that they could change sex, we’d call them irrational, mad savages. Yet, this is exactly what has happened in state-sanctioned medical facilities across the Anglosphere. The phenomenon of transgenderism and the medical malpractices that have ensued as a result serve to highlight how warped, confused, and perverse expressions of sexuality and aggression have become.
With regards to sexuality, we are professedly more liberated than ever. Access to pornography is immediate and the content extreme. Sexual kinks are normalised and celebrated. Alongside this we have the rise of new flags and labels for an ever-proliferating set of niche sexual ‘identities.’ Does this mean we are less repressed sexually? No. It turns out that our hyper-sexualised society is actually rather unsexy. As several surveys have shown, we are having less sex, and this is especially true amongst the younger generation. The commercialisation and politicisation of sex and ‘gender’ have accelerated at such a speed that for many it seems impossible to discern what a healthy and authentic sexual desire actually is and feels like. What are those people who exhibit their sexual fetishes at pride parades actually showing us? A comfortable, confident, and satisfying sexuality? Or the inevitable narcissism of a loveless and lonely individualism that attacks any genuinely meaningful attachments to others?
One of the many cognitive dissonances of woke progressivism is that it couples excessive sexual liberalism with excessive sexual puritanism. We are instructed to be understanding and inclusive of furries (people who dress up as animals for sexual pleasure) or even ‘minor-attracted people’ (paedophiles), yet according to the rules of #MeToo feminism, if a man placed an unwanted hand on a woman’s knee ten years ago, he should be cancelled and lose his job. This contradiction manifests itself in the clash between trans rights activism and radical feminism (or, as I prefer to call it, feminism). The trans rights activists argue for a rejection of all biological and sexual boundaries, and see no danger in this, while the feminists see danger everywhere.
This is very similar to the concept of anarcho-tyranny. Here, overt acts of aggression become more accepted, serious crimes go unchallenged, and criminals face few consequences (anarchy). At the same time, there is a zero-tolerance approach to small transgressions such as not wearing a COVID mask, or tweeting that a man cannot become a woman. According to the woke Left, we should try to rid the world of anything that could contain anything remotely aggressive. For example, statues should be taken down, paintings or novels should be given trigger warnings or banned entirely, and hate speech laws should be introduced to monitor what we say in the home. The countryside is racist, questions constitute an assault, and silence is violence. Yet in response to the genuine threat of sectarian violence and calls for the genocide of Jews, the state simply shrugs.
Within the area of sexuality, then, as with anarcho-tyranny, we have what I am dubbing porno-celibacy. In porno-celibacy, any sexual desire or behaviour is acceptable until someone’s subjective feelings say that it isn’t and it must be condemned. Warring claims of victimhood then ensue followed by competing definitions of inclusivity, identity, and reality. It’s not just that we don’t know where the boundaries are any more. It’s more that, untethered from any overarching moral framework, we don’t know what the boundaries are for, what would be their purpose? More broadly, Western civilisation no longer knows what levels of sexuality and aggression it is willing to tolerate, so currently the answer is simultaneously all of it and none of it. This doesn’t alleviate the guilt that Freud identified, it exacerbates it. No wonder we are unhappy, lonely, confused, and lacking in confidence.
Many commentators point to the many reasons Edward Gibbon gives for the fall of the Roman Empire, underscoring their alarming relevance to the present state of the West. However, we should remind ourselves that Rome didn’t collapse in a day and that its decline occurred over hundreds of years. One thing we do know is that in our current civilisation things can change very quickly. So, are we really witnessing the end of an empire or is our current empire just changing? It certainly seems like both a terrifying and exciting time to be alive. While many remain optimistic, it may be worth keeping in mind Freud’s warning: “a civilisation which leaves so large a number of its participants unsatisfied and drives them into revolt neither has nor deserves the prospect of a lasting existence.”
Former Twitter Chief Calls For Elon Musk To Be Arrested
Elon Musk should be threatened with arrest and detention if he refuses to censor right-wing content on his platform X, according to Twitters former vice president for Europe, Middle East and Africa. Bruce Daisley lamented […]
The post Former Twitter Chief Calls For Elon Musk To Be Arrested appeared first on The People’s Voice.
Polish-Made Tanks Lead Ukrainian Assault in Russia’s Kursk Region
As the Ukrainian offensive unfolds in the Russian Kursk region, the involvement of Polish-manufactured tanks has come to light, with significant impacts on Russian defenses.
The 22nd Ukrainian Mechanized Brigade has been at the forefront of the attack, utilizing PT-91 Twardy tanks, which have a history of being manufactured in Poland.
Retired General Waldemar Skrzypczak, former commander of the Polish Land Forces, noted the sufficiency of the equipment for the operation, reflecting confidence in the effectiveness of these tanks on this front. It was only after a week into the offensive that Ukraine eased its information blackout, allowing the emergence of photos and videos from the early days of the operation, revealing PT-91 tanks leading the charge. These tanks, long familiar within Poland, have contributed to considerable Russian casualties, drawing attention not just in Poland but also in Russia, where their presence has been exploited by Russian propaganda to allege the involvement of Polish mercenaries.
Military officials have described the PT-91 Twardy as an excellent machine for combat and expressed their lack of surprise that these tanks are part of the 22nd Brigade’s arsenal. General Skrzypczak emphasized the brigade’s preference for homogeneous equipment to streamline training, command, and logistics.
Polish-made PT-91 Twardy main battle tank operated by the Ukrainian 22nd Mechanized Brigade participating in the Kursk operation. pic.twitter.com/w4gcuslw9q
— Status-6 (Military & Conflict News) (@Archer83Able) August 11, 2024
The ongoing use of these tanks by the brigade, which received them back in 2023 and has since experienced heavy combat, including during last year’s unsuccessful Zaporizhzhia offensive, underscores their sustained operational readiness. Despite previous losses, these Polish machines have been maintained, repaired, and kept combat-ready with the assistance of Polish industry.
“They continuously maintain, repair, and fix them because they don’t have many options and strive to keep these tanks always combat-ready, and they do this with the help of the Polish industry,” explains General Skrzypczak.
The PT-91 Twardy, a significant upgrade over the Soviet-era T-72, features enhancements like the Polish Drawa fire control system, maintaining its reputation on the Ukrainian front despite newer tanks like the Leopards and Abrams entering service. General Skrzypczak acknowledges that while it may no longer be top of its class, the PT-91 remains a valuable asset in current operations, where it performs reliably at a higher level of technical readiness. This efficiency is crucial as these raiding units need to ensure their return from operations.
The Ukrainian offensive in the Kursk region shows no signs of abating, with fresh reports on Monday morning indicating the potential expansion of attacks to the Belgorod region of Russia as well.
BREAKING: Democrats are Using AI to Make Harris-Walz Rallies Look Bigger
On his Monday show Alex Jones discussed how the Democrats are making crowds look bigger than they are via the use of artificial intelligence and computer photo alteration software.
Don’t miss:
BREAKING: After Pushing for Increased Taxes on Tips, Kamala Harris Steals Trump’s ‘No Tax on Tips’ Initiative
On Monday Alex Jones discussed how Kamala Harris stole Donald Trump’s plan to not tax tips.
Don’t miss:
Kiev Failed to Notify Backers of Kursk Incursion – Berlin
Ukraine kept its plans for an incursion in Russia’s Kursk Region secret, the deputy spokesman for the German government has said. Wolfgang Buchner claimed on Monday that none of Kiev’s backers had been informed in advance about Ukraine’s plan to attack Russian territory.
“There is contradictory and sometimes deliberately distorted information about the operation, which was apparently prepared very secretly and without feedback,”Buchner said at a press briefing.
He did not condemn or otherwise appraise the situation, saying only that “everything so far looks like a spatially limited operation.”However, he noted that details were still unclear and therefore “it would be unwise to make a public statement.”
Buchner said Berlin would be in close contact with “all partners, including the government in Kiev” in relation to the incursion.
When asked whether Ukraine was using weapons supplied by Germany in the operation, Buchner said Berlin did not have sufficient information to comment. However, a spokesman for the German Defense Ministry separately clarified that there was nothing stopping Kiev from using the weapons supplied by Germany on Russian soil.
READ MORE: No talks with Kiev after attack on civilians – Putin
“International law stipulates that a defending state may also defend itself on the territory of the attacker… There are no obstacles whatsoever and Ukraine is free to choose its options,” he stated.
The same position was set out by Social Democratic Party’s (SPD) chairman Lars Klingbeil, who defended Ukraine’s “right to defend itself”by encroaching on Russian territory using Western-supplied weapons.
“That is what is happening right now, it is part of a war. You can find that brutal, we all want peace, but we are also consciously saying that Ukraine must be able to defend itself,” he asserted. He noted, however, that Kiev’s reasons for the incursion remain unclear.
“We will certainly hear more in the next few days whether it is about getting Russia to the negotiating table quickly, as some suspect, or whether it is about causing unrest on the Russian side,” the politician stated.
READ MORE: West backed Ukrainian attack on Kursk – Politico
Kiev’s incursion in Kursk Region, which was launched on August 6, is its largest attack on Russian territory since the outbreak of hostilities in February 2022. The Russian military earlier reported that the advance by Kiev’s forces into the country’s territory has been halted.