Ron Paul: Trump and Harris Ignore a Great Danger Facing America
The Penn Wharton Budget Model, a think tank headquartered at the University of Pennsylvania, recently released a study claiming former President Donald Trump’s economic plans would add about four trillion dollars to the national deficit over ten years while Vice President Kamala Harris’s economic plans would add about two trillion dollars.
Vice President Harris would increase the deficit largely through expanding refundable tax credits such as the child tax credit. Low-income Americans can qualify for refundable tax credits even if they have less federal tax liability. So this proposal includes a welfare program disguised as a tax credit. Vice President Harris also proposes spending 40 billion dollars on an “innovation fund” to increase the supply of “affordable” housing. Another of the vice president’s proposals is providing first-time homebuyers with up to 25,000 dollars in downpayment assistance.
Harris’s proposals could contribute to a new housing bubble. This bubble would inevitably burst, leading to an economic crisis likely worse than the “Great Recession” that followed the bursting of the last housing bubble. One reason it could be worse is that it may be accompanied by the bursting of several other bubbles and the rejection of the dollar’s world reserve currency status.
According to the study, President Trump will increase the deficit by cutting taxes without also cutting spending. President Trump has pledged to renew the 2017 tax cuts and also promised to stop taxing Social Security benefits. Trump’s tax cuts would help spur economic growth, job creation, and higher tax revenue. The study indicates that the pro-growth effects of Trump’s tax cuts are the reason it projects Trump’s tax policy will “only” increase the federal deficit by 4.1 trillion dollars over ten years as opposed to 5.8 trillion dollars.
It is common to describe tax cuts as “costing” the government. Saying tax cuts cost the government assumes that the government has a moral claim over an individual’s earnings, so anytime those running the government allow individuals to keep more of their money the rulers are being generous. The truth is that income belongs to the people who earn it and that saying tax cuts cost the government is like saying burglar alarms cost thieves. Therefore, any legislation that cuts taxes is a victory for liberty.
We should never allow concerns about government debt to prevent us from supporting tax cuts. Instead, we must focus on the real cause of the debt crisis — ever-increasing spending in a futile effort to run the world, run the economy, and run our lives. Increasing federal deficits will result in tax increases, either directly via Congress and the IRS or indirectly via the Federal Reserve’s inflation tax that results from the Fed’s monetization of federal debt.
Unless the federal government starts cutting spending and paying down the debt, America will experience an unprecedented economic crisis. Yet, neither Donald Trump nor Kamala Harris is even talking about this issue, much less proposing a serious plan to roll back the welfare-warfare state, reduce spending, and start to reduce the debt. Instead, both candidates are likely to increase spending. This is one reason it is difficult to take seriously the claim that this is the most important election in history.
This article first appeared at RonPaulInstitute.org.
Kamala’s Communist Death Cult
Kamala Harris is leading the United States down the road to nothing short of a repeat of Mao Zedong’s brutal Cultural Communist Revolution.
She is the candidate for a longstanding Marxist political machine that has finally emerged with its sights on total power.
A vote for Kamala Harris is a vote for a level of totalitarianism that is counter to everything that the United States represents.
Another City, Another Apartment Taken Over by Illegal Aliens
A 911 dispatch call out of Chicago, Illinois was uploaded to social media Monday Night where a case of Venezuelan illegal aliens taking over an apartment building was reported.
Infowars previously reported on a similar case of Venezuelan illegal aliens taking over an apartment complex in Aurora, Colorado in August where residents ‘were left to die‘. The aliens are reportedly using the commandeered apartment as a command base for theft rings.
BREAKING: A group of 32 armed Venezualans took over an apartment building in Chicago tonight. Here’s the audio of the 911 dispatch call.
— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) September 3, 2024
First they did this in Aurora, CO and now Chicago? Which city will be next?
This invasion happened on Kamala’s watch. pic.twitter.com/0L33y7PXto
In the call a dispatcher can be heard reporting 32 armed Venezuelans with motorcycles assembling in a courtyard of the apartment complex. Multiple 911 calls came in regarding the takeover.
“Winter is right around the corner. Did anyone honestly think these Venezuelan gangs who ruled the countries they came from, were going to be sleeping in tents in local parks while unarmed Chicago residents slept inside,” Patty McMurray said in The Gateway Pundit on Tuesday.
While Kamala Harris panders to blacks by trying to talk like them, real blacks are sounding the alarm about the alien takeover of their low-income communities.
Chicago resident warns ARMED Venezuelan gangs taking over apartment complex in their gun-free city…
— PattyMI (@PattyLovesTruth) September 3, 2024
“We got switches!” pic.twitter.com/RXyJRciPQz
The man can be heard saying that blacks in Chicago are armed and will defend their neighborhoods against the alien invasion.
Eric Weinstein: ‘I Don’t Know Whether Trump Will Be Allowed To Become President’
Eric Weinstein told Chris Williamson on the “Modern Wisdom” podcast that Donald Trump’s presidency has disrupted the old “rules-based international order,” which many view as an attempt to control global stability and wondered if the Republican nominee will “be allowed” to reenter the White House if elected in 2024. Weinstein argued that Trump’s unorthodox approach challenged the status quo, exposing flaws in the system and revealing that the impact of populist leaders on democracy and international agreements is more complex and significant than previously understood.
CHRIS WILLIAMSON: When we spoke at the start of the year, I said it was way too close to November to switch anybody out. Turns out that I was wrong.
ERIC WEINSTEIN: Beginner’s luck.
CHRIS WILLIAMSON: You said what are the odds that Joe Biden has a debilitating event between now and November including death, so he runs a one in 20 chance of dying in any given year or above that. I don’t think you know whether he’s even going to make it to November debilitating event could have been a debilitating public event
ERIC WEINSTEIN: I purposefully left it vague. I didn’t say the other part of it, which I now feel comfortable saying, which is…
CHRIS WILLIAMSON: What do you mean by that?
ERIC WEINSTEIN: I think there’s a remarkable story, and we’re in a funny game, which is: are we allowed to say what that story is? Because to say it, to analyze it, to name it, is to bring it into view. I think we don’t understand why the censorship is behaving the way it is. We don’t understand why it’s in the shadows or why our news is acting in a bizarre fashion. So let’s just set the stage, given that that was in February.
There is something that I think Mike Benz has just referred to as the rules-based international order. It’s an interlocking series of agreements, tacit understandings, explicit understandings, and clandestine understandings about how the most important structures keep the world free of war and keep markets open. There has been a system in place, whether understood explicitly or behind the scenes or implicitly, that says the purpose of the two American parties is to prune the field of populist candidates so that whatever two candidates exist in a faceoff are both acceptable to that world order.
From the point of view of, say, the State Department, the intelligence community, the defense department, and major corporations involved in international issues—from arms trade to, oh, I don’t know, food—they have a series of agreements that are fragile and could be overturned if a president entered the Oval Office who didn’t agree with them. And if the mood of the country was, “Why do we pay taxes into these structures? Why are we hamstrung? Why aren’t we a free people?” So what the two parties would do is run primaries with populist candidates and pre-commit the populist candidates to support the candidates who won the primaries. As long as that took place and you had two candidates that were both acceptable to the international order—that is, they aren’t going to rethink NAFTA or NATO or what have you—we called that democracy. And so democracy was the illusion of choice, what’s called magician’s choice, where the choice is not actually, you know, “pick a card, any card,” but somehow the magician makes sure that the card that you pick is the one that he knows.
In that situation, you have magician’s choice in the primaries, and then you’d have the duopoly field: two candidates, either of which was acceptable, and you could actually afford to hold an election. That way, the international order wasn’t put at risk every four years because you can’t have alliances that are subject to the whim of the people in plebiscites.
Under that structure, everything was going fine until 2016, when the first candidate ever to not hold any position in the military nor any position in government in the history of the Republic, Donald Trump, broke through the primary structure. Then there was a full court press: “Okay, we only have one candidate that’s acceptable to the international order. Donald Trump will be under constant pressure—he’s a loser, he’s a wild man, he’s an idiot, and he’s under control of the Russians.” And then he was going to be, you know, a 20-to-1 underdog, and then he wins. There was no precedent for this. They learned their lesson: you cannot afford to have candidates who are not acceptable to the international order and continue to have these alliances. This is an unsolved problem.
I don’t have a particular dog in this fight. I believe in democracy; I also believe in international agreements. And it is the job of the State Department, the intelligence community, and the defense department to bring this problem in front of the American people and say, “We have a problem. You don’t know everything that’s going on, and if you start voting in populist candidates, you’re going to end up knocking out load-bearing walls that you don’t understand.”
Bill Gates Pushing Digital ID in Kenya — Report
The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is continuing its digital ID agenda by helping advise Kenya in its rollout of the country’s Maisha Namba, a personal unique identifier tied to biometrics.
Down the road, implantable microchips are expected to be included in the system, although that is not currently part of the program.
MSM branded me a conspiracy theorist when i warned about this in 2020. It’s still seemed outlandish and frightening back then. Now everything has been normalized. We are cattle lined up at the abatoir.
— Robert F. Kennedy Jr (@RobertKennedyJr) September 3, 2024
The digital ID will expand the use of biometrics from fingerprints to iris and facial scans, at least as it currently stands.
India has been collecting all fingerprints, eyeball scans and facial recognition images in their Aadhaar system for years.
Alex Jones has been exposing the dark side of digital ID’s for decades.
“Individuals will be issued a digital ID as a virtual representation of their physical identification documents. The digital ID will not solely rely on fingerprint biometry like the Huduma card but will seek to widen the pool of biometrics in the national identification system to include iris and facial recognition,” Immigration and Citizen Services Principal Secretary Julius Bitok said in 2023, according to news site Kenyans.
Social programs, banking, medical, identification, purchases, birth certificates and other activities of modern society will require the Maisha Namba.
Many see the digital ID as the stepping stone to implantable microchips.
Interestingly, implantable microchips for humans have been trialed for decades. In 2004 the FDA approved the now-defunct VeriChip implant, a microchip the size of a grain of rice billed as ‘the future of patient identification‘ and ‘the future of emergency medicine‘.
Alex Jones specifically exposed the VeriChip in 2002, Jones was at the forefront of exposing the implantable microchip craze of the early 2000s.
The VeriChip’s eventual demise likely stemmed from the public’s opposition to being microchipped for ethical and privacy reasons.
“The VeriChip is injected under the skin of the upper arm or hip in an outpatient procedure,” Wired Magazine said in 2003. “A special scanner reads the RF signal emitted by the microchip to obtain the device’s ID number, which then is entered into a database to access personal data about the individual. Other potential uses of the chip, according to company officials, include scanning unconscious patients to obtain their medical records or restricting access to high-security buildings by scanning workers to verify their clearance.”
“Health Link is the connection between you and your personal health record. Health Link utilizes a tiny, passive microchip (the nation’s first and only microchip cleared for patient identification by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration) and a secure, private online database that links you to your personal health record. Your Health Link is always with you and cannot be lost or stolen. It provides emergency room doctors and nurses with your vital medical and emergency contact information, allowing them to treat you rapidly, accurately and safely during an emergency,” the VeriChip Corporation said on their website. “About the size of a grain of rice, the microchip is inserted just under the skin and contains only a unique, 16-digit identifier. The microchip itself does not contain any other data other than this unique electronic ID, nor does it contain any Global Positioning System (GPS) tracking capabilities. And unlike conventional forms of identification, the Health Link cannot be lost, stolen, misplaced, or counterfeited. It is safe, secure, reversible, and always with you.”
https://www.chipsetc.com/verichip—the-rise-and-fall-of-the-human-implant-microchip.html
Outside of the medical setting the VeriChip was made trendy with one nightclub microchipping it’s partygoers.
Patients of 16 regional hospitals in the Greater Palm Beach, Florida area along with Mexican government officials and a Florida family also received the chips during its heyday, among others. The Atlantic reported that you too will likely receive a chip, ‘someday’.
A military member once called into The Alex Jones Show and reported that he was microchipped.
In 2006 a study was published documenting the VeriChip’s vulnerabilities as well as research the team conducted on the chips.
“The VeriChip™ is a Radio-Frequency Identification (RFID) tag produced commercially for implantation in human beings. Its proposed uses include identification of medical patients, physical access control, contactless retail payment, and even the tracing of kidnapping victims. As the authors explain, the VeriChip is vulnerable to simple, over-the-air spoofing attacks. In particular, an attacker capable of scanning a VeriChip, eavesdropping on its signal, or simply learning its serial number can create a spoof device whose radio appearance is indistinguishable from the original. We explore the practical implications of this security vulnerability,” the study said in the ‘Abstract’ section. “The authors argue that: 1 The VeriChip should serve exclusively for identification, and not authentication or access control. 2 Paradoxically, for bearer safety, a VeriChip should be easy to spoof; an attacker then has less incentive to coerce victims or extract VeriChips from victims’ bodies.”
Same Line, Different Accent — Transracial Kamala Harris ‘The Ethnic Chameleon’
Kamala Harris continues her cringe tour while adjusting her accent to appeal to the local demographics in what many consider to be a disgusting display of pandering to her low-information voter base.
While speaking in Detroit, Michigan, a city that is 77.8 percent black, Harris, who is not black, did her best to speak like a black person. While speaking in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, a city that is only 23.2 percent black, Harris reverted back to her natural way of speaking.
The recent multiple personalities that Harris put on is not new to her, as she has been speaking as a black person off and on throughout her recent campaign.
‘Kamala the chameleon’ is likely pretending to be black to garner the black vote, however Infowars recently reported that Harris is not accepted by black Bronx voters and that blacks are likely to vote for Trump as he gave them a stimulus check, according to Don Lemon.
NEWSMAX Correspondent Cara Castronuova took to the streets of The Bronx, New York to find out if Black and Hispanic voters are influenced by identity politics.@CaraCastronuova pic.twitter.com/49UtLvRSc7
— NEWSMAX (@NEWSMAX) August 8, 2024
Harris is actually Indian, while Senator Elizabeth Warren, a white woman, pretends to be Indian.
Harris is likely taking after Joe Biden, as those who didn’t vote for Biden ‘ain’t black‘, according to Biden.
“If you don’t vote for me then you ain’t black.” pic.twitter.com/3twHC93O6B
— CMM (Corrupt Mainstream Media) (@CorruptMM) July 16, 2024
Similar to their affirmation of transgenderism, transracialism is a trait that is also deeply rooted in the Democrat party.
People Are Controlled By Identity Politics: #AlexWasRight