Child Rape Victim Testifies ‘Michelle Obama Raped Me When She Was a Man’
A child rape victim has blown the whistle and testified about the cult of pedophilia operating in the White House during the Obama years, alleging that both Obama and Biden raped her during their time […]
The post Child Rape Victim Testifies ‘Michelle Obama Raped Me When She Was a Man’ appeared first on The People’s Voice.
PROOF: Documents from FDA, Pfizer show that COVID “vaccine” shedding is REAL
Up until now, most of the research exposing Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) “vaccines” as dangerous – and exposing those who take them as disease and death spreaders – has come from independent sources. Now, the truth is coming from the federal government and Big Tech.
It took the sleuthing public, including the diligent truth-seekers at the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) advocacy group, a while to find all this, but we now know from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) itself that mRNA gene therapy products like those manufactured by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna do, in fact, shed onto others from those who take them.
A 2015 FDA document called “Design and Analysis of Shedding Studies for Virus or Bacteria-Based Gene Therapy and Oncolytic Products” defines shedding as “the release of [viral or bacterial gene therapy products] … from the patient through one or all of the following ways: excreta (feces); secreta (urine, saliva, nasopharyngeal fluids etc.); or through the skin (pustules, sores, wounds).”
The same document goes on to explain, according to the FDA, what gene therapy products are:
“All products that mediate their effects by transcription and/or translation of transferred genetic material.”
Since both the mRNA injections for COVID and adenovirus vaccines fall into this category, this is a clear-cut admission from the FDA itself that people who are “fully vaccinated” for COVID shed these poisons onto others through contact or close proximity, vindicating independent researchers who have been warning about this threat for years.
(Related: Research published last summer in Infectious Diseases Research shows that the fully vaccinated are walking bioweapons factories spreading mRNA poisons to others.)
Babies Drinking Spike Protein breast Milk
At a recent FLCCC conference in Phoenix, Dr. Pierre Kory delineated on the shedding phenomenon and the risks involved. Unfortunately for those who get shed on, the fully jabbed are contaminating others with spike proteins and other deadly jab components that are now being found in breast milk. And the threat can last for at least half a year after a person gets injected, meaning the risk of shedding is not just a temporary thing that lasts a few days as some claim.
“Shedding is unfortunately real,” Dr. Kory stated at the conference. “The FDA knows that.”
The FDA continues to deny all this, having issued a statement to The Epoch Times claiming that COVID jabs “are not regulated as gene therapy products,” thus making the guidance document previously cited “not applicable to the COVID-19 vaccines.” It does not stop there, though.
As Dr. Kory also explained, Pfizer’s own literature likewise explains that participants in its COVID injection trials risk spreading the poisons to others around them through inhalation or skin contact. Pfizer described this risk using the following two examples of potential “environmental exposures:”
“A male participant who is receiving or has discontinued [vaccine] intervention exposes a female partner prior to or around the time of conception.”
“A female family member or healthcare provider reports that she is pregnant after having been exposed to the [vaccine] intervention through inhalation or skin contact.”
There is also the risk of “secondary shedding,” which occurs when someone who gets shed on through environmental exposure by someone who got fully vaccinated then sheds it a second time to someone else.
“An example of environmental exposure during breastfeeding is a female family member or healthcare provider who reports that she is breastfeeding after having been exposed to the study intervention (the vaccine) by inhalation or skin contact,” Pfizer’s internal documents further admit, warning about adverse effects that could arise from these “indirect exposures.”
COVID jabs are deadly bioweapons spreading disease and death to the world. Find out more at BiologicalWeapons.news.
EXCLUSIVE: New Form Of Blood Clots Found In 50% Of The Dead, Coroner Survey Reveals
Welfare for Migrants Ensures the Border Crisis Will Continue
Earlier this month, The New York Post reported that the mayor of New York is giving away pre-paid cash cards—each carrying “up to $10,000“— to foreign nationals in New York. Most of these foreign nationals—i.e., “illegal immigrants”—have arrived in New York with no invitation, no employment prospects, and no plan for housing. But most of them plan on staying. And why shouldn’t they?
Upon arrival, thousands of them immediately went on the public dole in some way or another, relying on taxpayer-funded shelters, housing programs, and a variety of sources for “free” food. Those immigrants who have not found taxpayer funded housing in hotels—there are presently at least 66,000 of them—simply live on the taxpayer-funded streets as vagrants.
The latest idea from the city’s central planners is to pay out millions more via pre-paid debit cards—pre-paid, of course, by millions of people who actually work for a living. The city has already planned to spend at least $2.5 billion on the migrants in this way. An additional $53 million will go to grease the palms of bankers who will provide the cards.
This is just one story among many we’ve seen in recent years on how state, local, and federal policymakers have shoveled ever larger amounts of taxpayer funds to both legal and illegal immigrants. After all, there are at least 23 million foreign nationals residing in the United States—both legally and illegally—and both are subsidized by taxpayers to the tune of at least $150 billion per year. An additional $140 billion goes to immigrants who have been naturalized.
Clearly, governments across the United States are doing a lot to subsidize new immigration. It is well known by now that American cities and states—not to mention the federal government—offer “free” cash, housing, food, and more. Moreover, it is known that once the migrants get here, they can even hope for fast-tracked legal residency by claiming to be refugees. Then, once legal residency is established, it’s only a five year wait until the citizenship process can begin. At that point, one can apply for the full bevy of public benefits offered to citizens: endless access to Medicaid, food stamps, housing vouchers, and more. And, of course, these new citizens also get to vote.
Yet, most of the focus in the debate over immigration has been on the government doing too little to physically stop immigration. While Washington holds out a huge carrot to foreign nationals by handing out billions in social benefits, anti-immigration activists spend most of their time focusing on the “stick” of border control and deportation. Occasionally, a politician might offer a half-hearted claim that “the border is not open.” The migrants, however, know what is really going on.
Unfortunately, a focus primarily on border control and deportations ignores the true root of the problem. So long as the “carrot” remains an enormous incentive, the “stick” will produce limited results.
The Carrot versus the Stick
Moreover, the anti-immigration lobby’s focus on border control and deportation is exactly how the pro-immigration activists like it, and their scheme is going according to plan. The scheme works like this: entice ever-increasing numbers of migrants to the border with ever-larger promises of social benefits. Then, once the migrants get to the border, portray any and all border control efforts as amounting to “kids in cages” or “whippings” by border patrol agents.
The full reality of the border situation is never covered in the media, of course. While the alleged “kids in cages”—or their current PR equivalent—are featured regularly in the officially approved organs of public communication, the exploited workers who pay for all this never seem to get a mention. If the legacy media were to give a moment’s thought to who is paying for the endless “caravans” of future tax-eaters to the border, the media narrative would be different. The regime journalists would be running news stories about small business owners who are being forced to cough up ever larger sums in taxes—including, of course, the inflation tax—to pay for another 50,000 or 100,000 foreign nationals in any given month.
If the legacy media cared about context, they’d feature stories about plumbers and waitresses whose children are now in overcrowded classrooms filled by the children of migrants who have contributed nothing to the construction or maintenance of those schools. Meanwhile, of course, the longtime taxpayers are stuck with ever larger property taxes to pay for it all. The media would note how these working people have paid taxes in that jurisdiction for many years, just to be told they’d better pay more. Ordinary working people are handed an ever-growing tax bill by the graduate-schooled elites who, for whatever reason, have become obsessed with subsidizing immigration to the fullest extent they can get away with.
In other words, the current scheme is working perfectly: draw countless new migrants to the border with taxpayer money, and when any taxpayers object, call them fascists (or worse).
Moreover, so long as the pro-immigration lobby can keep the other side fixated on the “stick” rather than the “carrot,” the anti-immigration side ends up supporting policies the regime wants. For example, consider how the anti-immigration lobby favors police-state powers in the name of controlling immigration. These measures include “real ID,” “E-Verify,” and the execrable 100-mile deep “border zone” in which any American can be stopped and his “papers” demanded. All this is sold as a way of “preventing illegal immigration.” In practice, the regime is fine with all this since these measures end up greatly expanding federal surveillance and police power.
Subsidizing Border Crossings
Many anti-immigration activists like to focus on border controls and insist that theirs is the only feasible solution. “Good luck cutting welfare to migrants!” they say. They think they’re being clever, but one could just as easily ask them: “how are those mass deportations going for you? I’m sure they’ll begin any day now.” Or we might ask: “how’s that border wall coming? Congratulations, the state of Texas managed to close a tiny portion of the border near Eagle Pass. Good luck with closing the rest of it.”
Without addressing the lure of subsidized migration, “border control” will meet with limited success. After all, if it were easy to close the border—which runs 1,900 miles through mostly remote country—the United States would not be awash in illegal drugs imported from abroad. So long as there is a pile of easy cash waiting on the American side of the border, drug dealers and migrants will find a way to get to it.
Thus, the most sustainable and enforceable policy changes lie in cutting off access to taxpayer funded largesse for the foreign born—both legal and illegal—and in making citizenship more difficult to obtain. Given that legal immigrants collect taxpayer-funded social benefits even more than illegal aliens, there is no reason to draw the line simply at illegal aliens. So long as these benefits are available to any immigrants, the benefits will act as an incentive to migrants who can’t pay their own bills. Moreover, so long as citizenship remains a means of gaining access to welfare benefits, citizenship itself must be harder to obtain. The current requirement that legal residents wait five years to apply for citizenship is hardly a meaningful obstacle. This waiting period for citizenship ought to be closer to twenty years.
Ending the migration subsidies has an added benefit in that doing so does not violate property rights or empower the state. Rather, cutting off migrant welfare restricts state power while reducing the fiscal burden on the taxpayers. “Citizenship,” of course, is not a natural right or a property right. It’s an administrative status, which in the modern world mostly exists to grant access to the public purse.
Anti-Welfare, Not Anti-Immigrant
It is important to note that none of these changes are “anti-immigrant.” These policies merely oppose the immigrants that consume taxpayer-funded benefits. Indeed, current immigration policy is fartoo restrictive on the self-sufficient migrants, who are an economic boon. Many companies and entrepreneurs, for example, encounter countless difficulties in hiring desirable immigrant workers because current policies have placed low ceilings on the number of visas issued to these workers. Moreover, many employers turn to immigrant laborers because the native-born population is too busy getting high to pass a drug test and show up for work. Yet, while hard-working business owners are legally barred from hiring the skilled workers they need, unskilled workers pour across the border and receive cash payments—funded by those who actually work. Migrants who don’t need social benefits—of whom there are many—would benefit from policies cutting immigrants off from taxpayer funds. After all, the productive migrants end up paying to subsidize social benefits for others. Only immigrants on the dole would suffer from being cut off. Until that happens, don’t expect the flood of subsidized migration to ease any time soon.
Watch: Democratic Leaders Tell America That Illegal Aliens Come First
Illinois To Begin Jailing Parents Who Refuse To Transition Their Kids
Authorities in Illinois are set to begin arresting parents who object to gender transitioning their children, despite the medical and psychological risks associated with puberty blocking and surgery. The new law, Bill 4876, introduced earlier this month, […]
The post Illinois To Begin Jailing Parents Who Refuse To Transition Their Kids appeared first on The People’s Voice.
WHO Warns Everybody Will Have Cancer Within Next 20 Years
The World Health Organization (WHO) has predicted that by the year 2050, nearly every human on Earth will be diagnosed with cancer. Over the next thirty years, a new WHO report warns, billions of people will be diagnosed with cancer for […]
The post WHO Warns Everybody Will Have Cancer Within Next 20 Years appeared first on The People’s Voice.
Trump Vows To Defend Christianity Against ‘Evil, Satanic Elite’
Former President Trump has promised to use his second term in the White House to save and protect Christianity from the “Satanic globalists” who are seeking to make America a dark and evil place. “Remember, […]
The post Trump Vows To Defend Christianity Against ‘Evil, Satanic Elite’ appeared first on The People’s Voice.