Cover Up: GovTrack DELETES Page Rating Kamala Harris As Most Liberal Senator
Political ranking service GovTrack quietly deleted its scorecard ranking presumptive Democrat presidential nominee Kamala Harris as the most left-leaning senator of 2019.
GovTrack’s scorecard had ranked Harris as the most radical senator in 2019, even further left than socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt).
In a list of all 100 senators in 2019, Harris scored #100 in its ideology analysis, winning the title of the most leftist senator — Sanders came in right behind her at #99.
CBS News anchor Nora O’Donnell even confronted Harris herself in 2019 over GovTrack rating her as the most left-leaning senator.
CBS: “You’re considered the most liberal United States senator.”
KAMALA: “I— somebody said that, and it was actually Mike Pence on the debate stage…”
CBS: “Actually, nonpartisan GovTrack has rated you as the most liberal senator.”
KAMALA: *blank stare* pic.twitter.com/rmcz43aNNb— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) July 24, 2024
But shortly after Harris became the Democratic Party’s presumptive presidential nominee by securing the majority of Joe Biden’s delegates this week, GovTrack attached an disclaimer on the page that said:
“Once the 2019-2020 session of Congress was complete, the statistics for the entire session and for Harris’s entire tenure in the senate showed a different story.”
It’s not just Axios. Now GovTrack went back and erased Kamala’s ranking as the most liberal United States Senator.
The cover up is on! https://t.co/fV5scYUrVm pic.twitter.com/T9f0DUdB7K— Mike Berg (@MikeKBerg) July 24, 2024
And soon after that edit, GovTrack ended up scrubbing the page altogether.
They actually deleted the page now. pic.twitter.com/4tbhZQK4CI
— Bad Kitty Unleashed ? (@pepesgrandma) July 24, 2024
This is just the latest example of the media’s effort to rewrite Harris’ record in a bid to make her appear more moderate and accomplished to the American electorate with approximately 100 days left until the 2024 election.
Also on Wednesday, Axios asserted that Republicans and the Trump campaign falsely labeled Harris as Biden’s “border czar”, despite the fact they themselves reported three years ago that Biden appointed her as his border czar.
This you? pic.twitter.com/FhqVuPlvw6
— Catturd ™ (@catturd2) July 24, 2024
The cover up is on!
Dems Lose BLM: Org Calls Out ‘Hypocrite’ Party for Bypassing Democratic Process by ‘Installing’ Kamala
The Black Lives Matter organization once at the heart of the left’s social justice movement has abandoned the Democrat Party after it undemocratically swapped Joe Biden for Kamala Harris against the will of primary voters.
In an X post on Tuesday labeling Democrats “hypocrites,” the official BLM account made a timeline of events following Biden’s abrupt exit Sunday and criticized party insiders for selecting Harris as their new nominee, arguing the nomination should be decided by the people.
“A 24-hour process of talking to party bosses is not democratic, nor is it a process Democrats should be proud of,” BLM wrote. “We do not live in a dictatorship. Delegates are not oligarchs.”
Timeline of Events
— Black Lives Matter (@Blklivesmatter) July 23, 2024
Sunday
•Joe Biden drops out.
•Kamala Harris announces campaign with Biden endorsement.
•Kamala Harris says she is going to work hard to earn the nomination.
•Kamala Harris makes calls to party delegates.
Monday
•Kamala Harris continues making calls to… pic.twitter.com/ZxzyxegZin
“Installing Kamala Harris as the Democratic nominee and an unknown vice president without any public voting process would make the modern Democratic Party a party of hypocrites.”
A statement released on BLM’s website criticized the DNC for refusing to host primary debates, where voters would likely have noticed Biden’s cognitive decline, and for pressuring him to exit the race following the debate, disregarding the will of millions of black Americans who voted in the primary.
BLM proceeded to urge the Democratic National Committee to hold a “virtual snap primary” and to “create a process that allows for public participation in the nomination process, not just a nomination by party delegates.”
The organization’s efforts to maintain the integrity of the election process was lauded by many on social media.
Glad to see y’all actually being on the right side
— Hodgetwins (@hodgetwins) July 23, 2024
The system removed Joe and installed Kamala and left voters out of the decision
Wow BLM on the right side of history.. thats something i thought id never say
— aka (@akafacehots) July 23, 2024
Wow!! BLM has stood up where everyone else on the left has bowed down and accepted status-quo.
— Eddie (@EddieSportas) July 23, 2024
Good on you.
Kudos for this, from an Independent ?
— Holden Culotta (@Holden_Culotta) July 23, 2024
The organization also pushed back against leftists on X who argued the process had been finalized and Harris was the nominee.
we are happy to be the clowns calling for democracy
— Black Lives Matter (@Blklivesmatter) July 23, 2024
We’re trying to save the plot.
— Black Lives Matter (@Blklivesmatter) July 23, 2024
Being principled is never wrong.
— Black Lives Matter (@Blklivesmatter) July 23, 2024
Very?!?
— Black Lives Matter (@Blklivesmatter) July 23, 2024
We are critiquing a party that has proclaimed “democracy is on the ballot” in an effort to persuade Black voters to participate in the upcoming general election. They have presented this as the most serious election for democracy in our lifetimes. However, democracy isn’t just an…
— Black Lives Matter (@Blklivesmatter) July 23, 2024
It remains to be seen how, or if Democrats will respond to BLM’s valid criticisms.
Kimberly Cheatle Admits Secret Service Did Not Keep Audio Recordings From Trump Shooting
The Secret Service does not have any radio communications from the day of the Trump shooting in Butler Park, Pennsylvania, according to the testimony of Kimberly Cheatle, the Secret Service director who recently resigned from […]
The post Kimberly Cheatle Admits Secret Service Did Not Keep Audio Recordings From Trump Shooting appeared first on The People’s Voice.
300 American Cities Facing ‘Day Zero’ Water Crisis, Scientists Warn
Hundreds of American cities are facing a manufactured water crisis in the next few years, according to a disturbing new study. The study, published in Nature, found “rapid groundwater-level declines” globally in the 21st century of […]
The post 300 American Cities Facing ‘Day Zero’ Water Crisis, Scientists Warn appeared first on The People’s Voice.
Disney and Cartoon Network Show Creator Arrested on Sickening Array of Child Porn Charges
Kyle Carozza, the creator of the Cartoon Network series Mighty Magiswords and Disney’s Doc McStuffins, has been arrested on a sickening array of enhanced child pornography charges following an Internet Crimes Against Children (ICAC) investigation. […]
The post Disney and Cartoon Network Show Creator Arrested on Sickening Array of Child Porn Charges appeared first on The People’s Voice.
The Party of “Democracy” Will Now Choose Your Candidate For You
On Sunday, July 21, President Biden dropped out of the 2024 presidential campaign via a text-only post on Twitter/X. Less than an hour later, Biden—also via a text-only post on Twitter/X—endorsed vice president Kamala Harris for the presidency.
Thus, in just a few minutes, the ruling party in Washington completely erased the primary election process from one of the country’s major parties. That is, the same Democratic party that tells us it is the party of “democracy” just completely cut ordinary voters out of the selection process for the Democratic nominee.
Instead, the Democratic nominee in 2024 will be chosen by a small group of elite party insiders. We’re told there will be an “open convention” in Chicago to choose the nominee, but all that means is that that there is no pre-determined nominee going into the convention. In any case, however, the nominee will be chosen by delegates and superdelegates (i.e., wealthy party elites like Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama) behind closed doors.
The Democratic party’s efforts to circumvent the primary process are quite remarkable for a ruling coalition that lectured the general public endlessly in 2020 about how Donald Trump was allegedly a “threat to democracy” and how “democracy is on the ballot.”
Yet, this is what we’ve come to expect from political elites who use the term “democracy” as a propaganda term. For these people, the term has no objective meaning, it just means “something we like.” “Anti-democratic,” in contrast, just means “something we don’t like.”
Moreover, its use as a propaganda term can be seen in the way that “democracy” is used in the same way as “revolutionary” by Marxist regimes. In such cases “revolutionary” is code for “in favor of the ruling elites” and “something we like.” Similarly, the opposite of “democracy” in a Marxist regime is “counterrevolutionary” or “bourgeois.” Those terms were essentially code for “against the ruling party” and “thing we don’t like.”
Such terms have no actual content in the usual sense of a word. Thus, the term “democracy” simply means “good” and “not democratic” means “evil.”
For example, President Joe Biden delivered two major speeches in 2022 on how “democracy” will supposedly be abolished if his opponents win. In November of that year, former president Barack Obama solemnly intoned that if Republicans win in Arizona, “democracy as we know it may not survive.” This is repeated among the party’s media allies. One writer at Salon chastised voters for daring to let their votes be influenced by economic concerns when “democracy is under threat.” One New York Times headline bemoaned the apparent reality that voters don’t seem interested in “saving democracy” when it’s supposedly all so clear that “democracy is in peril.” At no point in these jeremiads is it ever explained how a vote for the out-of-favor candidate will actually end elections or universal suffrage or any other event or institution associated with democracy.
In Biden’s September 2022 speech in Philadelphia, he went on for twenty minutes about an imagined threat to democracy, without ever actually defining what democracy is. One was reminded of Fidel Castro howling in his multi-hour speeches about the threat to “the revolution” from insidious imperialists and counterrevolutionaries—by which he meant anyone who opposed his regime. The term “revolutionary” had no connection to actual revolution in this context. It simply meant “something my regime likes.”
Meanwhile, the elites have gone to great lengths to ensure that no actual democracy—in the technical or traditional sense—has taken place in the nomination process. The Democratic Party made it clear that it would not allow any presidential hopefuls to challenge Biden to a debate. Early Democratic challengers Congressman Dean Phillips and Marianne Williamson were told to get lost. The most significant challenger within the party, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., was effectively expelled from the party in October 2023. He was forced to declare his candidacy as an independent candidate soon after.
So, after denying Democratic voters the chance to vote on Kennedy or anyone else, the party has now also denied the voters the chance to vote on Harris or whoever else the party elites will decide is the nominee in 2024.
I don’t mention any of this to burnish the reputation of the Republican Party, by the way. Those of us who remember the Ron Paul campaigns in 2008 and 2012 remember how the GOP conspired to torpedo his campaign, going so far as to change the convention rules, ex post facto, to deny Paul a prime-time speaking position and to disenfranchise his delegates.
Yet, it’s not the GOP that’s claiming to be the guardian of the vox populi while conspiring to undermine that vox at every turn.
Rather, the alleged protectors of democracy carry on the tradition of redefining the term “democracy” to serve the interests of the elites whenever it suits their purposes. We see this not only in America, but globally. Any time the “wrong” people win an election—”wrong” according to global elites—the outcome of the election is declared a “threat to democracy.” We see this repeatedly in European politics where “democracy” is defined as support for the unelected European commission. German political elites, meanwhile, have repeatedly declared the rightwing AfD party a “threat to democracy” because party members keep winning elections. In Latin America, “democracy” means to support the social-democratic left. When rightwing Jair Bolsonaro was elected in Brazil, that was denounced as anti-democratic. When leftwing Brazilian president Dilma Rousseff was impeached by a democratically elected legislature, that was denounced as an anti-democratic coup. Democratically elected Javier Milei was denounced by uber-establishment magazine The Economist as “a danger for democracy.”
It is now clear that to be in favor of democracy in 2024 is to support whatever the ruling party elites want you to support. To be “pro-democracy” now apparently means to vote for the candidate selected for you by party elites in secret meetings. According to the ruling elites, in a true “democracy,” there’s no voting allowed.
MESSAGE TO DEEP STATE MINIONS: Don’t Follow Your Orders, Come Out With Your Hands Up & Join The Resistance