Top Gastroenterologist Sounds Alarm: Covid-Vaccinated Lacking Key Gut Bacteria Necessary For Immune System
Covid-vaccinated individuals are lacking in bibidobacteria, a healthy gut bacteria essential for the immune system, according to groundbreaking research by gastroenterologist Dr. Sabine Hazan which explains why the immune systems of the vaccinated have been […]
The post Top Gastroenterologist Sounds Alarm: Covid-Vaccinated Lacking Key Gut Bacteria Necessary For Immune System appeared first on The People’s Voice.
Historic Christian Churches Are Burning To the Ground In France At a Rate of 1 Every 2 Weeks
Historic churches are burning to the ground in France at the shocking rate of one every two weeks – and yet according to Macron’s government and mainstream media, this situation is completely normal and there […]
The post Historic Christian Churches Are Burning To the Ground In France At a Rate of 1 Every 2 Weeks appeared first on The People’s Voice.
Rosie O’Donnell Spreads Conspiracy Theory Trump Wasn’t Shot!
Unhinged Hollywood C-lister Rosie O’Donnell claimed she’s unsure whether former President Donald Trump was really shot during an assassination attempt at a rally in July.
“Now, I don’t know what happened that day, but I don’t think it was a bullet that hit him,” the League of Their Own actress said of Trump’s close call with death at a July 13 rally in Butler, Pennsylvania.
Rosie O’Donnell spreads the conspiracy theory that Trump wasn’t shot.
— Tim Young (@TimRunsHisMouth) September 1, 2024
Can we sue her for $1 billion, like they did to Alex Jones? pic.twitter.com/afa9uj43ta
“I don’t. I think it was maybe a fragment of something more,” O’Donnell continued in a video posted to TikTok last week, offering no evidence to back her accusations.
“But I don’t know, without a scar to be seen, yet blood all over it,” she added.
Following the assassination attempt, the FBI drew criticism after Director Christopher Wray appeared to cast doubt on whether a bullet actually hit the former president; however, the agency later clarified, “What struck former President Trump in the ear was a bullet, whether whole or fragmented into smaller pieces, fired from the deceased subject’s rifle.”
The obese 62-year-old Hollywood has-been went on to claim Trump’s immediate reaction after surviving the attempt on his life — pumping his fist in the air while shouting “Fight!” — was too peculiar to be real.
“Look at the photos of him right after with his fist pumping, a normal reaction, right, to almost being assassinated.”
O’Donnell went on to question why no one was looking into the insane conspiracy theory.
“There’s something really hinky about the whole thing, and I don’t know what it is, but I am saying this: For people who go on conspiracy theories for endless cycles, you know, deep dives, how come this isn’t getting a deep dive?”
The high-profile lesbian revealed one particularly puzzling piece of evidence making her question the shooting is the fact that Trump’s ear is completely intact and fully healed.
“How come people are just like, look, his ear is normal now?” O’Donnell asked. “Yeah. Well, he’s not an octopus. He doesn’t regrow his limbs, his ears, his nose, or whatever. You don’t regrow. We’re humans. You don’t regrow your arms or your ears.”
O’Donnell’s conspiracy theory isn’t just limited to fringe lunatics like herself; it’s also been spread by members of the national media, with MSNBC host Joy Reid among the originators of the lies.
MSNBC’s Joy Reid suggests Trump might not have been hit by a bullet at all, hints that the entire attack might be staged: pic.twitter.com/w1IVFlNov6
— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) July 18, 2024
Breaking Exclusive Video!
— Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) July 18, 2024
Alex Jones Responds To Joy Reid’s Claim That Trump Assassination Attempt Was Staged pic.twitter.com/Jl4gabm9XC
In July, just days after Trump was shot, Reid published a video claiming America still didn’t know if a bullet actually hit Trump, or whether it was shrapnel or shattered glass from the teleprompter.
O’Donnell’s ridiculous theory led some on social media to question whether she might be sued in court similar to how Alex Jones was sued for questioning the Sandy Hook shooting.
Rosie O’Donnell spreads the conspiracy theory that Trump wasn’t shot.
— Tim Young (@TimRunsHisMouth) September 1, 2024
Can we sue her for $1 billion, like they did to Alex Jones? pic.twitter.com/afa9uj43ta
Jones reacted to O’Donnell’s claims in a statement on X, defending her right to question the shooting and calling on conservatives not to censor her idiotic comments.
The Democratic Party hired PR firms to make statements in my name about Sandy Hook, that I never said. They built a straw man in the mockingbird media and massively exaggerated what they claimed I said. Conservatives, populist, and other pro freedom folks should not fall in to… https://t.co/lYaShBZ6wO
— Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) September 1, 2024
“The Democratic Party hired PR firms to make statements in my name about Sandy Hook, that I never said,” Jones wrote.
“They built a straw man in the mockingbird media and massively exaggerated what they claimed I said. Conservatives, populist, and other pro freedom folks should not fall in to the trap of backing the censorship of Rosie O’Donnell. Even what the Democrats claim I said about SH is protected speech. Everyone gets to speak including the Westboro Baptist Church.”
While the left would like to bury the assassination attempt that branded Trump an American legend and pretend it didn’t happen, the truth is someone tried to shoot the former president — and missed by a half an inch.
Is Child Trafficking Exposé ‘City of Dreams’ Being Sabotaged?
A new film exposing the horrors of child trafficking, called City of Dreams, debuted in theaters last week to great fanfare.
The film, produced by Tony Robbins and distributed by Roadside Attractions production company, tells the story of Jesús, a Mexican boy whose soccer dreams are abruptly crushed when he is trafficked across the U.S. border into Los Angeles and forced into sweatshop enslavement.
But much like the acclaimed child trafficking exposé Sound of Freedom, theater patrons are reporting unusual activity in movie theaters showing the film.
According to reports, some sold-out shows of City of Dreams are actually empty theaters, leading some to wonder if tickets are being purchased en masse to prevent more people from watching the film.
Why are seating charts for City of Dreams showing full but nobody’s here?
If @AMCTheatres employees know of suppression orders, why would they risk admitting it. Let me show you.
Who is behind these tactics? pic.twitter.com/o1Om9bJfts— Kev Posobiec (@KevinPosobiec) September 2, 2024
BREAKING:
— FXHedge (@Fxhedgers) August 31, 2024
I just tried to attend a showing of City of Dreams and they denied entry and told me the theater was full, but it’s weird because my friend who is already inside the movie said there are seats available. 3/4 full. The movie has already started.
What’s going on @amc,… https://t.co/47JZUZvQ7y
An alleged AMC employee reached out to Human Events editor Jack Posobiec to claim the company is suppressing City of Dreams.
I work at AMC and our regional managers are telling us to tell people City of Dreams is ‘full’ when it’s not. I’m need to keep this job and wish to talk about this so I hope you can use your platform to share this message.
Just got this wild message about City of Dreams
— Jack Poso 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) August 31, 2024
Same thing happened with Sound of Freedom pic.twitter.com/CSpuuhIMw5
Similar sabotage tactics were deployed during Sound of Freedom‘s release.
The mainstream media bent over backwards smearing the anti-child trafficking film, with some outlets calling it just as “dangerous” as child trafficking itself.
The Biden administration and Department of Defense were even sued for canceling screenings of Sound of Freedom at military bases without explanation.
Could there be powerful interests working to sabotage City of Dreams in a similar manner?
Spotted in Hollywood. “City of Dreams” tells the story of children being sold into slavery.
— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) September 2, 2024
Kamala lost track of 300k migrant kids.
She oversaw a massive child trafficking operation.
It’s all coming out! pic.twitter.com/e2x6OSinzh
Video: Americans Flock To Aurora, CO To Defend USA From Venezuelan Gang Takeover
Americans from other states are reportedly flocking to an Aurora, Colorado, apartment complex that has allegedly been overrun by criminal Venezuelan gangs, despite Colorado Gov. Jared Polis (D) recently dismissing the dangerous situation.
“This is our fucking community!” said one tattooed man out of a megaphone while driving down a street in the area where the gangs have reportedly taken over.
Volunteers showing up to Aurora to take the city back. 🔥🔥🔥 pic.twitter.com/LhiCl0OPpB
— I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸 (@ImMeme0) September 2, 2024
While he was filming, the man encountered several other people also monitoring the streets for the Venezuelan gangs terrorizing locals.
“We’re here to take our country back,” said the man behind the camera.
“We from Dallas, Texas,” another person said.
The video was uploaded online just days after unconfirmed rumors spread online claiming Hells Angels bikers were on their way to Aurora to potentially combat the Venezuelan drug gang.
Start from the Top
Last week, to mark Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s historic endorsement of Donald Trump, I wrote a two-part series on ultra-processed food and endocrine disruptors, which RFK Jr. has identified as among the principal causes of America’s unprecedented health crisis.
Kennedy and Trump have promised to Make America Healthy Again, with a wide-ranging investigation into the underlying causes of chronic disease.
A fundamental part of that plan involves addressing significant failures of government that have allowed corporate food manufacturers to fill their products with cheap rubbish ingredients like soybean oil and high-fructose corn syrup, and an ever-expanding list of additives whose safety is anyone’s guess; and allowed America’s food, water and air to become contaminated with toxic chemicals that have been linked to diabetes and obesity, cancer, heart disease, behavioural conditions like autism and neurological diseases like Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s.
HUGE STUDY LINKS PROCESSED FOODS TO DEPRESSION.
— RAW EGG NATIONALIST (@Babygravy9) May 27, 2024
Yet more evidence that processed food is about the worst thing you can eat if you want good physical and mental health. 👇 pic.twitter.com/Ty0MZvIHrI
Kennedy’s emphasis on structural factors and corruption is absolutely correct. Organizations like the FDA, and the systems they have in place to regulate the food supply, medicines and industry, just aren’t fit for purpose. They favour corporations at the expense of the American people. And is it any wonder, since regulators glide straight into corporate jobs—often with the companies whose products they’ve approved?
For example, an investigation by Science magazine in 2018 reported that “11 of 16 FDA medical examiners who worked on 28 drug approvals and then left the agency for new jobs are now employed by or consult for the companies they recently regulated.” Science concluded, weakly, that “This can create at least the appearance [my emphasis] of conflicts of interest.”
In last week’s piece on ultra-processed food, I looked in detail at the FDA’s “Generally Recognized as Safe” (GRAS) system for food additives, which I’ve suggested really ought to be renamed “Generally Recognized as Insane.”
Under the guise of regulating novel additives to the American food supply, we’ve ended up in a position where there are as many as 10,000 food additives, compared to around 2,000 in the EU.
I say “as many as,” because the simple fact is, we don’t know how many there are. And what’s more, we have to trust the corporations that manufacture them and add them to their products, that they’re safe.
The GRAS system was first introduced in 1958, when the Food Additive Amendments were passed, to require that all non-standard food additives—ingredients that aren’t typically found in a normal home kitchen—should be tested adequately for safety in humans. At first, manufacturers had to submit new ingredients to the FDA for testing if they wanted to use them commercially in food, but as the demand for approvals grew, the FDA simply couldn’t keep up. So manufacturers just started adding new ingredients to their foods without telling the FDA. Instead of reining manufacturers in and reasserting control, the FDA regularised this system in 2016, retrospectively and prospectively.
In 2024, a company can produce a new food additive, decide it’s safe and then bring it to market without any scrutiny from the FDA at all. Like I say, this is insane.
A boy’s blood testosterone levels at just three months old will predict his semen quality when he’s 18-20. This is why estrogenic endocrine disruptors are so pernicious: because exposure happens at all stages of physical development and it can have lifelong effects. pic.twitter.com/Xy8yCQ0ucd
— RAW EGG NATIONALIST (@Babygravy9) November 26, 2023
The insanity extends well beyond food additives. I was reminded of this a few days ago, when I read about the FDA’s approach to plastic food-contact materials. On top of regulating what goes into food, the FDA is also in charge of regulating food packaging too.
As with the GRAS system, approvals are voluntary and it seems manufacturers of food packaging can simply get away with what they want. Companies can seek guidance from the FDA about their manufacturing process, but they don’t have to. The FDA doesn’t even monitor which companies manufacturers sell their products to.
This is true with recycled plastics, which more and more food makers are using. Coca Cola now uses 100% recycled PET bottles, for example, and Annie’s cereal boxes contain a liner that’s made with 35% recycled plastic film.
Recycled plastic presents unique risks to consumers that the FDA seems totally incapable, and perhaps even unwilling, to address.
I’ve said elsewhere, in a detailed Twitter thread on the subject, that if there’s one thing that’s worse than plastics, it’s recycled plastics.
Why? Well, for starters, we know that recycled plastics shed considerably more microplastics than “virgin” plastics. Recycled plastics are older and more brittle as a result of the recycling process, which usually subjects them to heat, mechanical stress and the action of various chemicals. That means a recycled plastic water bottle or food container will release even more microplastics into the contents than a freshly manufactured one. (The recycling process itself also releases massive quantities of microplastics into the environment.)
But it gets worse. Recycled plastics are also hugely contaminated with chemicals you wouldn’t normally find in virgin plastics. It’s easy to understand how this would be the case when you understand how plastics are processed for recycling. Even when plastics are sorted by type of plastic—for example, PET vs PVC—you still get plastics being mixed from a wide variety of different applications. You could have plastics used as food-contact materials being processed with plastics that have been used to store agrochemicals like glyphosate, medications or even human and animal waste products. All of these chemicals could end up, via recycled plastics, in your food and drink.
A recent study illustrated the extent of this contamination in detail. Researchers tested plastic pellets taken from 13 different recycling plants around the world. They found 491 readily identifiable organic compounds in the pellets, and tentatively identified a further 170. The chemicals spanned a whole variety of different classes, from pesticides and biocides, to pharmaceuticals, industrial chemicals, surfactants, fragrances, stimulants and even human metabolites (i.e. end-products of human digestion).
By far and away, the most common class of chemical found in the recycled plastic was pesticides and biocides—162 different compounds were discovered—followed by pharmaceuticals—89 compounds—and industrial chemicals—65 compounds.
Once again, it turns out the FDA’s regulations just aren’t fit for purpose. The current rules on recycled plastics in food-contact materials may benefit corporations pursuing a better bottom line, and also help them to “greenwash” their products by claiming they use “environmentally friendly” materials, but the truth is, they’re likely to increase the risk to consumers considerably. Once again, it’s consumers—ordinary Americans—who come last.
Plastics and plastic chemicals are a clear and present danger to our health today, but so are the attitudes and systems that allowed us to reach this point, where plastic food-contact materials are probably become less rather than more safe. Until we change those attitudes and systems, we can ban as many chemicals and additives as we want, but nothing will really change.
We need to start from the top and work our way down, right to the bottom.
Top Economist Martin Armstrong’s Computer Warns 2024 Will Probably Be Our Last Election