News

In the past two weeks Ukraine has taken credit for at least two separate strikes on peculiar targets – Russian “over the horizon” radar stations using drones with an impressive flight range of at least 1200 miles. Until this point, long range attacks into Russian territory have been exceedingly rare. So, why these specifics radar stations?

If we accept the fundamental truth that Ukraine is nothing more than a proxy battleground between Russia and the west, then you might say WWIII has already begun.

The powers-that-be have been content to keep the situation contained primarily to Ukraine so far, but a recent event suggests things are about to change. There’s something very strange happening on the nuclear front between NATO and Russia and I believe it might be time to consider the possibility that a false flag threat is in the works.

In the past two weeks Ukraine has taken credit for at least two separate strikes on peculiar targets – Russian “over the horizon” radar stations using drones with an impressive flight range of at least 1200 miles. Until this point, long range attacks into Russian territory have been exceedingly rare. So, why these specifics radar stations?

The Voronezh-DM stations were positioned outside the city of Orsk and the region of Krasnodar (Armavir); far away from the front lines in Ukraine. The strikes are being hailed as the furthest Ukraine has attacked into the heart of Russia, but the corporate media has ignored the wider implications of the situation.

It is likely that the drones used were of US or European origin. NATO has (until the past couple of days) enforced tight restrictions on how their weapons can be used by Ukraine. Long range drones and cruise missiles hitting targets deep in Russia invites major blowback, including the threat of a nuclear response.

That said, it’s not so much the weapons used that concerns me, it’s the specific targets that Ukraine supposedly chose.

Russia’s over-the-horizon radar systems have a detection range of at least 6000 miles (the real range is classified) and scan specifically for high altitude ballistic missiles. They are not designed to detect lower flying medium range cruise missiles (ATACMS) and drones. Meaning, the two stations destroyed by Ukrainian weapons are meant to act as an early warning system for nuclear attack.

The Ukrainians supposedly defied NATO restrictions, not once, but twice, to target radar systems that have nothing to do with them. In fact, the arrays sit in permanently fixed positions and neither array was actually aimed at Ukraine, they were aimed to the North and Southwest of Russia. The Armavir radar was constructed in 2009 to close a gap created by the loss of radars in Ukraine, and was also meant to replace an older Daryal radar in Gabala. Interestingly, Armavir and Orsk “search fans” watches the skies primarily above the Middle East, including Israel, and a large chunk of Europe including Switzerland.

Instead of attacking vital strategic resources like oil refineries or ammo depots, Russia’s nuclear defenses are being systematically hobbled. Why?

It’s important to understand that a strike of this kind deep into the center of Russia requires complex planning and logistics. It cannot be achieved without covert intel on the ground as well as aid from satellite surveillance. Ukraine relies completely on NATO satellites and intel; no such strike would ever be possible without NATO involvement. Furthermore, the drones used would need to have the ability to evade early detection systems and remain hidden for thousands of miles. This kind of technology comes mainly from the west.

In other words, there’s no way that these attacks were accomplished by Ukraine without extensive help and approval from the US or European command. I question the notion that a Ukrainian pilot was even remotely flying the drones. We’re talking about some of the most closely defended radar stations in the whole of Russia.

Why does any of this matter? Let’s consider the ugly realities…

First, the targeting of Russian nuclear defenses might make the Kremlin believe they are being prepped for a nuclear strike. Why else would their ballistic radar be singled out? This means they will be on high alert for a possible nuclear exchange. Not good.

Second, the Voronezh-DM stations are used to identify FALSE POSITIVE alerts of nuclear attack. Meaning, if there a weapon is used against Russia that mimics a high altitude ballistic missile, their ability to detect that it’s NOT a nuke has been reduced. They might launch their own warheads in response to a non-nuclear strike (a fake strike or false flag).

Third, Armavir and other stations could be used to record ballistic missile activity well outside Russian air space (in places like the Middle East). It’s possible these strikes were meant to blind Russia and stop them from detecting missile events that are unrelated to the Ukraine war.

Fourth, it’s possible that NATO and Ukraine believe dismantling the radar sends a message that if Russia threatens nuclear attack, they might be hit first. All this means is that Russia won’t give a warning, they’ll simply launch.

Fifth, the attack on Armavir alone meets the conditions the Russian government laid out publicly in 2020 for actions that could trigger a nuclear retaliatory strike. Russia’s early warning network is part of the country’s broader nuclear deterrent posture.

“The conditions specifying the possibility of nuclear weapons use by the Russian Federation” include any “attack by an adversary against critical governmental or military sites of the Russian Federation, disruption of which would undermine nuclear forces response actions,” according to the Basic Principles of State Policy of the Russian Federation on Nuclear Deterrence the Kremlin published in 2020.

So far there has been no indication on how Russia will retaliate, but let’s consider the circumstances at the front right now. Ukrainian defenses are thin and they lack the manpower needed to maintain the most rudimentary of strong points. As I noted last month, Ukraine’s front line is about to be overrun, likely this summer, with Russia opening a new offensive push in the north near Kharkiv.

NATO countries are now say they support Ukraine’s use of long range weapons inside Russia. This means major metropolitan areas of Ukraine will be on the the table for Russia’s own long range strikes, a measure which they have avoided for the most part. Also watch for the potential use of thermobaric bombs (vacuum bombs) by Russia; these are massively destructive weapons that have so far been absent from the battlefield (aside from unverified reports).

The west is sending Russia the message that they will not allow Ukraine to lose, they will not pursue diplomatic solutions and if Russia begins gaining significant ground, anything goes. Does this include nukes? It’s hard to say.

My suspicion is that the establishment wants to create a scenario in which Russia is led to overreact to an event, or, the public is led to believe Russia is a legitimate nuclear threat to the west. There is also the outside possibility that Russia is being blocked from monitoring a future ballistic incident in the Middle East.

The timing of the radar attacks comes only weeks before the planned Ukraine “peace conference” in Switzerland on June 15^th. Although major leaders from the US, China, and Europe will not be attending (and Russia isn’t invited), the summit is still a juicy target for a false flag and thus unification of western interests around a larger war with Russia. I’m not saying the conference itself will be attacked, necessarily, but a major attack during the conference could be used to sell the idea of total NATO intervention.

If the goal is to expand the war then any perceived hostilities aimed at the conference could also be used as an excuse to rally popular support. The fact that so many world leaders including Biden refuse to show up makes it even more dubious.

I highly doubt the establishment wants to trigger a global nuclear war. They have everything to lose and very little to gain. They just spent the better part of the last century building up one of the most intricate economic and political control grids in the history of humanity. I don’t think they would be happy to see it all vaporized in the blink of an eye. That said, a limited nuclear event might serve their interests well.

As I write this multiple governments including the French government are calling for European troops to be deployed to Ukraine. Some political leaders want them to go as “advisers” and trainers. This is exactly what the US did right before it deployed extensive military forces to Vietnam. Remember the false flag Gulf of Tonkin incident?

Something very odd is going on here. I have no doubt that WWIII is the intended outcome of the confrontation between NATO and Russia in Ukraine. The question is, how do they plan to arrange that outcome while convincing the American and European public to join the war effort? They need a serious false flag.

---

POWERFUL — MUST WATCH: The Globalist System Is Collapsing In Real Time, Warns Bilderberg Expert Daniel Estulin

---

Wall Street Journal reports Democrats growing alarmed with Biden’s obvious cognitive decline during closed meetings as the 2024 election nears.

Democrat lawmakers are becoming more alarmed with Joe Biden’s cognitive decline “behind closed doors” as the 2024 election approaches, according to a Wall Street Journal report.

The WSJ reported Tuesday that, based on over 45 interviews with Democrats and Republicans, lawmakers have been raising eyebrows over Biden’s cognitive slippage during closed door meetings over the last several months.

Participants in private meetings with 81-year-old President Biden say he has shown signs of slipping. The White House says he’s sharp and his critics are playing partisan politics. https://t.co/niiogqMxst https://t.co/niiogqMxst

— The Wall Street Journal (@WSJ) June 5, 2024

The 81-year-old Biden is the oldest person to hold the presidency. His age and cognitive fitness have become major issues in his campaign for a second term, both in the minds of voters and in attacks on him by Republicans. The White House and top aides said he remains a sharp and vigorous leader.

Some who have worked with him, however, including Democrats and some who have known him back to his time as vice president, described a president who appears slower now, someone who has both good moments and bad ones.

• Power up with Nitric Boost that’s now 40% OFF! This potent formula gives you the massive edge in strength and superior circulation for that unparalleled performance you’ve been looking for!

For much of his career, Biden enjoyed a reputation on Capitol Hill for being a master negotiator of legislative deals, known for his detailed knowledge of issues and insights into the other side’s motivations and needs—and for hitting his stride when the pressure was on. Over the past year, though, with Republicans in control of the House, that reputation has diminished.

The WSJ went on to describe how attendees of meetings with Biden have said he “showed his age in several of the exchanges.”

“Some who attended the meetings attributed off-key moments to his speech impediment and his tendency to be long-winded,” the outlet reported. “Those who expressed concern about Biden said the behavior they saw suggested an unevenness, not the caricature of an addled leader that some of his political opponents draw. The White House said the president’s doctors have found him fit to serve, and that his recent annual physical showed no need for a cognitive test.”

The White House pushed back against the WSJ’s report, insisting it’s simply based on House Republicans “making false claims.”

“Congressional Republicans, foreign leaders and nonpartisan national-security experts have made clear in their own words that President Biden is a savvy and effective leader who has a deep record of legislative accomplishment,” said White House spokesman Andrew Bates. “Now, in 2024, House Republicans are making false claims as a political tactic that flatly contradict previous statements made by themselves and their colleagues.”

Questions about Biden’s mental fitness sparked renewed urgency in February after Special Counsel Robert Hur reported that Biden’s memory was “significantly limited” during questioning about his retention of classified documents after serving as vice president.

Though Hur found Biden had “willfully retained and disclosed classified materials after his vice presidency when he was a private citizen”, he declined to prosecute Biden because it “would be difficult to convince a jury that they should convict him – by then a former president well into his eighties – of a serious felony that requires a mental state of willfulness.”  

“Mr. Biden would likely present himself to a jury, as he did during our interview of him, as a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory,” Hur wrote.

Biden’s interview was apparently so addled with instances of his mental decline that Attorney General Merrick Garland has refused to release the audio of the exchange despite the transcript being publicly available.

Liberal outlet Axios also reported this week that Congressional Democrats — especially in swing states — have also begun to “Biden-proof” their campaigns, distancing themselves from their 81-year-old leader in the wake of his terrible poll numbers.

Biden may get a bump in support because of Trump’s felony conviction, but several Democratic lawmakers tell Axios the president’s middling poll numbers to date have made distinguishing themselves from him a priority.

There is “more distancing now as his numbers continue to tank,” said one House Democrat seeking re-election in a competitive district, adding that they are “pretty much washing my hands of his campaign.”

Another House Democrat said there is “always an element where you run your own race,” but “now it’s even more pronounced.”

Of course, to the average American voter, Biden’s cognitive and physical decline has been obvious for years now. But Democrats are appearing to realize he’s become a liability for their reelection chances just 5 months from Election Day.

---

Follow Jamie White on X | Truth | Gab | Gettr | Minds

Data such as this is why many refer to the Covid shots as ‘lethal injections’.

A study published Monday which analyzed statistics from ‘Our World in Data’ indicated that despite the alleged ‘savior’ of Covid vaccines, excess deaths worldwide still remain high.

“Excess mortality has remained high in the Western World for three consecutive years, despite the implementation of containment measures and COVID-19 vaccines. This raises serious concerns. Government leaders and policymakers need to thoroughly investigate underlying causes of persistent excess mortality,” the study said in the ‘Conclusion’ section.

Interestingly, Monday’s study which looked at the entire global population is not the first piece of research analyzing mortality rates in recent years.

A Norwegian study published in January had also found an increase in non-Covid-related deaths.

“There was significant excess mortality (number of deaths) in 2021 and 2022 for all causes (3.7% and 14.5%), for cardiovascular diseases (14.3% and 22.0%), and for malignant tumours in 2022 (3.5%). In terms of ASMR, there was excess mortality in 2021 and 2022 for all causes (2.9% and 13.7%), and for cardiovascular diseases (16.0% and 25,8%). ASMR was higher than predicted in 2022 for malignant tumours (2.3%). There were fewer deaths than predicted from respiratory diseases (except COVID-19) in 2020 and 2021,” the study said in the ‘Results’ section.

It was recently reported by Infowars that a research article out of Cyprus had discovered major excess mortality post-Covid injection.

“Our findings raise serious concerns regarding the potential impact of the vaccination campaign and other causes on mortality,” the research article said in the ‘Conclusion’ section.

Last year another research article chronicled data from 17 Southern Hemisphere countries and discovered that Covid vaccines contributed to excess mortality rates.

“In the 17 countries, there is no evidence in all-cause mortality (ACM) by time data of any beneficial effect of COVID-19 vaccines. There is no association in time between COVID-19 vaccination and any proportionate reduction in ACM. The opposite occurs,” the research article said in the ‘Abstract’ section. “All 17 countries have transitions to regimes of high ACM, which occur when the COVID-19 vaccines are deployed and administered. Nine of the 17 countries have no detectable excess ACM in the period of approximately one year after a pandemic was declared on 11 March 2020 by the World Health Organization (WHO), until the vaccines are rolled out.”

Infowars also reported on the excess death rate in the U.S. based off a preprint study coauthored by Dr. Peter McCullough.

Social media users are also discussing the excess mortality rates in great numbers.

Even when users don’t specifically mention the Covid vaccine in their excess death posts, commenters often posit its involvement.

Besides graphs, some users have posted tables and charts chronicling the excess mortality trend.

---

Ed Dowd Drops Bombshell Data: Hematological (Blood-Related) Claims Up 522% Above Trend in 2022

---

Getting the shot doesn’t protect you from getting Covid, but once you get it you’re more likely to die.

A study published earlier this year indicated that individuals vaccinated with the Covid injection have a higher mortality rate once hospitalized for Covid infection verses their non-vaccinated counterparts.

“Among COVID-19 patients, mortality rate was significantly higher among Vax vs. NVax patients (p=0.002). The Charlson’s Comorbidity Index score (CCI) was also significantly higher among Vax vs. NVax COVID-19 patients. However, the mortality risk remained significantly higher (p=0.02) when we compared COVID-19 Vax vs. NVax patients with similar CCI score, suggesting that additional factors may increase risk of mortality,” the study said in the ‘Results’ section.

The study was based on data from individuals who were hospitalized between May 2020 and November 2022.

“Interestingly, mortality among Vax patients in this cohort was 70% compared with 37% in the NVax group, and overall survival rate was ~2 times higher in the NVax patients,” the study said in the ‘Results’ section.

The researchers also found that the more doses of the gene therapy exotic technology patients have had injected into them, the higher the likelihood it was that they would die.

“Of special relevance to our data, Piotr Rzymski et al. reported that (9) among subgroups of Vax hospitalized patients (representing 1% of all hospitalized), mortality rates increased with additional vaccine doses and increased post-vaccination time,” the study said in the ‘Discussion’ section.

While the researchers said that only one percent of hospitalized patients were vaccinated, that doesn’t indicate that vaccines keep people out of the hospital, as the researchers claimed earlier in the study in the ‘Introduction’ section, as many times hospitals label the vaccinated as non-vaccinated.

While trying to explain away the theory that Covid vaccines kill people, the researchers unironically said that people who get vaccines are more unhealthy.

“One explanation of our findings might be that of hospitalized patients, Vax patients tend to be less healthy,” the study said in the ‘Results’ section.

Even if that indicates that people who are already unhealthy are more likely to get vaccines and not that the vaccines make people unhealthy, that still indicates that those who keep their health in order are less likely to go get injected, likely due to health concerns.

The Covid shots are known to increase in lethality after repeated doses, increase Covid infection rates, result in insane and gross turbo cancers, reproductive destruction, cause miscarriages, paralyzation, increase excess death rates, autoimmune disorders in the thyroid, as well as deadly headaches, seizures and heart inflammation in addition to a multitude of serious ailments seen in massive population studies and contain hundreds of times the allowable levels of DNA contamination leading to mutagenic effects, contaminating the blood supply, as well as permanently altering the DNA of the vaccinated and their offspring while being expected to kill people for a very long time into the future.

In the U.S. the CDC recommends all Americans receive their Covid shot and that young children receive extra, while Canada recommends another Covid shot for the pregnant, indigenous, ‘racialized’ & ‘equity-deserving’.

---

Lara Logan Destroys The New World Order In Epic Alex Jones Interview 

---

Watch: Top Comedians Expose COVID Jab Heart Complications & Gov’t Lies

Legendary comic Joey Diaz joined fellow comedian Theo Von’s podcast this week for a hilarious conversation that at one point touched on the harmful side effects of the experimental Covid shots.

In a video clip going viral online, Diaz told Von the whole world has gone mad following the Covid pandemic, saying the shots physically hurt people and overall mental health is worse.

Joey Diaz & Theo Von Discuss the New Normal

“It’s a different f*cking world. Try to make a doctor’s appointment now. Try to make a heart appointment. Like if you call today, they’ll go, ‘Yeah f*cking July 8th.’ Because that f*cking needle f*cked everybody’s heart up.”… pic.twitter.com/qWVZ6gUY7F

— Chief Nerd (@TheChiefNerd) June 5, 2024

He continued, telling Von, “I got a hernia! Who the fuck knows what they’re putting in food anymore. You don’t know what you’re really eating. You know, fucking vegetables, fruit tastes like shit sometimes, it tastes good others.”

Next, Diaz pointed out it’s nearly impossible to book a doctor’s appointment nowadays, saying, “Try to get a doctor’s appointment now. Try to get a heart appointment. They’ll tell you, ‘Yeah, fuckin’ July 8th.’ Because that fucking needle fucked everybody’s heart up. There’s a ton of shit going on. God knows, they don’t tell you shit, man.”

When Von asked if governments lying to their people is becoming more common, Diaz suggested this is how the world has always been, but that the internet is now allowing the masses to dissect the propaganda and misinformation.

Diaz again mentioned the Covid shots harming hearts before stating, “I think the biggest thing I’m looking at is I’ve never seen mental health like this. I know people, I grew up with people, and I talk to them now and they’re not the same fucking person.”

The elite are losing the culture war, which is why they’re resorting to drastic and deadly measures.

Also, don’t miss this flashback clip of Diaz joining The Alex Jones Show with Joe Rogan back in 2010.

---

---

Dmitry Peskov previously referred to Washington and its allies as “unfriendly states” or “opponents”.

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov referred to the United States as an “enemy” while speaking to reporters on Tuesday, in an apparent hardening of rhetoric between the two countries.

It remains unclear if the use of the word signals an official policy change, as the spokesman had previously argued that only President Vladimir Putin can make such decisions.

Washington’s refusal to allow former US marine, UN weapons inspector and RT contributor Scott Ritter to travel to St. Petersburg was “the latest manifestation of the rabid campaign to prevent US citizens from interacting with the Russian Federation” – which would only be “understandable” if it was somehow related to his former intelligence status, Peskov told journalists on Tuesday.

“We are now an enemy country for them – much like they are for us,” Peskov said, while acknowledging that restrictions applying to former intelligence officers, especially on travel “to a hostile country,” are common across the world.

READ MORE: Moscow comments on Scott Ritter passport seizure

The Kremlin previously called the United States and other Western countries that have supported and armed Ukraine and imposed sanctions on Moscow as “unfriendly states” or “opponents.”

The shift in language follows Washington’s decision to let Kiev use American-supplied weapons against targets inside Russia, beyond what the US considers Ukrainian territory.

READ MORE: Putin names Russia’s real enemies

In March, Peskov noted that Moscow objects to US officials who insult President Putin, but that in general there is “no anti-American sentiment” in Russia. He expressed hope that “sooner or later the realization that the peoples of America and Russia are not enemies will eventually come.”

Putin said in January that the elites of Western countries were the true enemy of Russia, while Ukraine is a mere tool in their hands. 

“The point is not that they are helping our enemy, but that they are our enemy,” the Russian president said, arguing that the conflict between Moscow and Kiev was orchestrated by Western elites who seek to inflict a “strategic defeat” on Russia.

READ MORE: Biden calls Putin ‘a butcher’

Last month, Putin reiterated that “the entire Western community is working for our enemy, dreaming about Russia ceasing to exist in its current form,” but stopped short of branding any particular Western state an ‘enemy’.

Former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, who now serves as deputy chair of Russia’s Security Council, and several other hawkish officials, have repeatedly branded Moscow’s adversaries as “enemies”over the past two years – but Peskov previously said that only President Putin can “formulate and state Russia’s official foreign policy position.”

---

Lara Logan Destroys The New World Order In Epic Alex Jones Interview 

---