Biden Touts ‘Dead on Arrival’ Plan to Overhaul Supreme Court in Last Months of Presidency
WASHINGTON, D.C. (LifeSiteNews) — Outgoing Democratic President Joe Biden says he intends to use his final months in the White House promoting a plan to “reform” the U.S. Supreme Court and its most recent decisions, an apparent bid to seize on left-wing discontent with a handful of recent rulings that does not currently have a chance at actually becoming law.
Biden’s proposal, which he has said is based on three months of conversation with “constitutional scholars,” is comprised of a constitutional amendment stating that the “Constitution does not confer any immunity from federal criminal indictment, trial, conviction, or sentencing by virtue of previously serving as President”; a federal law establishing eighteen-year term limits for Supreme Court justices; and a federal law containing “binding, enforceable conduct and ethics rules that require Justices to disclose gifts, refrain from public political activity, and recuse themselves from cases in which they or their spouses have financial or other conflicts of interest.”
“In recent years, the Supreme Court has overturned long-established legal precedents protecting fundamental rights,” said the White House. “This Court has gutted civil rights protections, taken away a woman’s right [sic] to choose, and now granted Presidents broad immunity from prosecution for crimes they commit in office.”
Vice President Kamala Harris, who recently took over for Biden as Democrats’ presumptive presidential nominee this November, endorsed the plan as key to solving what she called a “clear crisis of confidence facing the Supreme Court.”
The U.S. Constitution provides that justices “shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour,” meaning for life unless impeached, which cannot be changed by an act of Congress and would take a constitutional amendment. That and the amendment Biden does propose would require either a two-thirds supermajority in both chambers of Congress or a convention called by two-thirds of the state legislatures, then ratification by popular vote in 38 states.
Republican Speaker of the House Mike Johnson has called the plan “dead on arrival” in the GOP-controlled chamber, prompting Biden to alarmingly reply, “That’s what he is.” The president later clarified he meant “his thinking” was dead on arrival and did not intend the comeback as a threat.
While no part of the plan has a chance of becoming law in the next six months, it continues Democrats’ catering to liberal activists’ hatred of the Court over a string of high-profile rulings that have gone against their interests, including overturning Roe v. Wade in 2022; and this summer affirming some presidential immunity for Donald Trump and overturning the Chevron doctrine that gave significant regulatory discretion to unelected bureaucrats; as well as ongoing smears against the personal integrity of conservative Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito.
Biden announced earlier this month he was dropping out of the 2024 race and endorsing Harris to take over as Democrat presidential nominee, following weeks of public and private calls to step aside ever since a disastrous televised debatemagnified longstanding concerns about the 81-year-old president’s mental infirmityand convinced many the problem could not be obscured well enough to keep him politically viable. Harris has reportedly obtained enough delegate pledges to secure the nomination, though she too has faced discontent with her own job performance and doubts about her own odds of victory.
So far, RealClearPolitics and RaceToTheWH indicate that the change in Democrat nominee has somewhat narrowed the gap between the candidates but not yet upended the trajectory of the race; Trump maintains his lead both in aggregations of the national popular vote and in the Electoral College.
The Democratic National Convention, where Democrats’ choice for president is supposed to be formally nominated, begins August 19 in Chicago, Illinois.
BREAKING VIDEO: James O’Keefe Predicts Multiple Black Swan Events To Stop Trump
Netanyahu Utilizes ‘Big Lie’ Tactic in Address to US Congress, Receives 58 Standing Ovations
(LifeSiteNews) — In an address before a joint session of Congress last week, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu appeared to maintain the “big lie” propaganda technique described in the Jewish Virtual Library and, with no little irony, attributed to the words and actions of Adolf Hitler.
“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it,” the Jewish Virtual Library entry reads. “The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”
How these tactics of relentless lying and censorship have been utilized, for example, in the COVID-19 “vaccine” injection campaigns hardly needs to be presented to LifeSiteNews readers. As summarized even more than three years ago by Dr. Michael Yeadon, it was “abundantly clear” that “everything” the public was told on this topic was “between untrue and downright lies,” while the efforts to censor such voices was incessantly executed by “elite” controlled media and social platforms.
The same tactics are plainly evident with Israeli war propaganda that was on full display last week as Netanyahu “received no fewer than 58 standing ovations while speaking before both houses of Congress and spewing the most despicable lies you could possibly imagine,” as described and documented by Australian commentator Caitlin Johnstone.
To cite just a few examples, the prime minister repeated long-debunked atrocity propaganda about the events of October 7 falsely asserting that Hamas “burnt babies alive” and killed two babies in an attic.
As early as last December, Israel’s own media reported from official local sources that only “one baby was murdered” that day, “10-month-old Mila Cohen,” who was apparently tragically killed by a stray bullet in a fire exchange between belligerents.
READ: Uncovering the truth behind Israel’s justification for its war in Gaza
In contrast, some might charge the prime minister of projection since he has presided over a horrendous genocidal attack upon the civilian population in Gaza, which has taken the lives of at least a reported 39,400 people, including the killing of 16,251 children as of July 22. This includes testimonies of children “incinerated,” “shredded,” “missing body parts,” “being crushed by buildings,” starving to death and toddlers being “definitively” and intentionally shot by Israeli snipers.
Children in the Gaza Strip are intentionally shot by Israeli snipers, says orthopedic surgeon Dr. Mark Perlmutter from North Carolina, who was there during the end of April and first few weeks of May.
— The Cradle (@TheCradleMedia) July 23, 2024
Perlmutter told CBS News Sunday Morning on 21 July that throughout all his… pic.twitter.com/jUtzLrpkHb
Contrary to the ‘big lie,’ Israel killed ‘hundreds’ of its own people on October 7, blamed Hamas
As is common with “the big lie” propaganda technique, the state and its acolytes in the media often inverse the truth in their constant repetitions, boldly accusing their adversaries of the crimes they themselves commit.
Thus, as the Jewish Virtual Library explains, “even though the facts which prove” such statements to be outrageous lies “may be brought clearly” to the minds of the public, many people “will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation.”
Netanyahu, whom Jewish journalist Max Blumenthal describes as the “genocidal criminal of the century,” went on to tell Congress that Hamas wants “Palestinian civilians to die so that Israel will be smeared in the international media and be pressured to end the war.”
READ: Israeli soldiers celebrate the ‘torturing, humiliating, and mocking’ of Palestinians on social media
Yet earlier in the speech, the foreign head of government repeated to Congress the often incomplete propaganda refrain that Hamas had “butchered 1,200 people” as a result of the October 7 raid while withholding the well-established facts reported by the Israeli press that perhaps hundreds of the 1,139 Israeli deaths, including 782 unarmed civilians, were killed by the Israeli forces themselves through indiscriminate fire and even the deliberate targeting of homes and vehicles where Israeli hostages were known to be present.
This means that after Netanyahu’s army deliberately killed many of its own citizens, his nation’s propaganda ministry, which has firm roots in the Western press, even in the so-called “alternative media,” continues to lie, “smearing” their adversaries by blaming them for these barbarous murders they intentionally committed against their own people in order to pursue an advantage in the international press themselves.
On October 7, Israel killed ‘more Jews than any other anti-Semite in recent history’
This irony was thus explained by Blumenthal in a July 13 interview when he observed that “the Israeli army has been confirmed as a leading participant in what Vice President Kamala Harris called ‘the worst atrocity against the Jewish people since the Holocaust.’”
“And Israel’s whole mission, its reason to exist, is supposed to be to keep Jews safe. And here they are killing more Jews than any other anti-Semite in recent history and doing it deliberately for political reasons,” he observed.
Furthermore, the purpose of inflating the death toll with these atrocities and propaganda was for Israel “to give itself more political space to destroy all of Gaza, kill a large percentage of the population and commit genocide,” Blumenthal continued. And when the inflated numbers were not sufficient to fulfill these ends, “they concocted ‘mass rape,’ ‘beheaded babies,’ (and) ‘fetuses cut from women.’ But it all started with first exaggerating the death toll.”
READ: Israel used ‘Hannibal Directive’ to kill its own people on October 7, local media reports
Therefore, with the Middle East prime minister also ironically framing the conflict as “a clash between barbarism and civilization” for his American audience last week, radio host Scott Horton agreed, stating, “Netanyahu is right that it’s barbarianism versus civilization, but he clearly is the barbarian.”
This is further confirmed by his public statements erroneously citing “a 3,000-year-old text (the Old Testament) for permission explicitly to kill innocent men, women, and children” while providing such genocidal instructions to the Israeli military, he said.
As recognized by close observers for months, including Colonel Douglas Macgregor, the Zionist project has had a long-standing goal of expelling the Palestinian people, including Christians, from the land they have lived on for centuries. The Israelis have made this goal “abundantly clear off and on for many years. This is not a secret. Now it’s happening.”
READ: Col. Macgregor: The ‘top priority’ for Israel is to make Gaza ‘unlivable,’ expel all survivors
‘Big lie’ inversion of truth further displayed in ‘human shield’ mantra
The Jewish Virtual Library entry goes on to explain that “in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility” because “the broad masses of a nation” would never consider fabricating “colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously” themselves. And thus, when the false propaganda is so often repeated, they will still doubt even clear facts that counter this narrative presenting the very opposite to be the truth.
Thus, the Israelis’ “big lie” inversion of the truth is further displayed in the long-repeated claim that Palestinians commit the international crime of using their own people as “human shields” that is intended to provide the Israeli army with a supposed propaganda alibi for their massive slaughter of tens of thousands of children and women in the last 10 months, and many more over the last several decades.
Netanyahu was sure to include this repeated reference in his speech, stating that “a senior Hamas official” had “boasted that Palestinian women and children ‘excel at being human shields.’”
The reality: Israel guilty of using human shields to a colossal degree, even as a formal policy
The only problem is for many years it has been clear there is virtually no evidence for Palestinians using human shields, even while, ironically, the evidence is decisive that the Israeli army has routinely committed this international crime themselves, for decades, and even as an exercise of established policy.
In 2005, the Guardian reported how the Israeli high court sought to put the practice to an end ruling “that the (Israeli) army’s long-standing practice of using Palestinian civilians as human shields in combat is illegal under international law” and must come to an end.
The original case had been filed by “human rights organizations that said the army routinely forced Palestinian civilians into dangerous situations as a means to protect soldiers. Some of the most common methods were to force Palestinians into buildings to see if they were booby-trapped, or to enter the hideouts of wanted men and tell them to surrender. Soldiers also forced civilians to stand in front of them when on patrol.”
So insistent upon maintaining the practice of using Palestinians, including children, as human shields, the Israeli military even sought to appeal the decision of their nation’s high court at the time in order to continue practicing this international war crime.
(LifeSiteNews) — In an address before a joint session of Congress last week, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu appeared to maintain the “big lie” propaganda technique described in the Jewish Virtual Library and, with no little irony, attributed to the words and actions of Adolf Hitler.
“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it,” the Jewish Virtual Library entry reads. “The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”
How these tactics of relentless lying and censorship have been utilized, for example, in the COVID-19 “vaccine” injection campaigns hardly needs to be presented to LifeSiteNews readers. As summarized even more than three years ago by Dr. Michael Yeadon, it was “abundantly clear” that “everything” the public was told on this topic was “between untrue and downright lies,” while the efforts to censor such voices was incessantly executed by “elite” controlled media and social platforms.
The same tactics are plainly evident with Israeli war propaganda that was on full display last week as Netanyahu “received no fewer than 58 standing ovations while speaking before both houses of Congress and spewing the most despicable lies you could possibly imagine,” as described and documented by Australian commentator Caitlin Johnstone.
To cite just a few examples, the prime minister repeated long-debunked atrocity propaganda about the events of October 7 falsely asserting that Hamas “burnt babies alive” and killed two babies in an attic.
As early as last December, Israel’s own media reported from official local sources that only “one baby was murdered” that day, “10-month-old Mila Cohen,” who was apparently tragically killed by a stray bullet in a fire exchange between belligerents.
READ: Uncovering the truth behind Israel’s justification for its war in Gaza
In contrast, some might charge the prime minister of projection since he has presided over a horrendous genocidal attack upon the civilian population in Gaza, which has taken the lives of at least a reported 39,400 people, including the killing of 16,251 children as of July 22. This includes testimonies of children “incinerated,” “shredded,” “missing body parts,” “being crushed by buildings,” starving to death and toddlers being “definitively” and intentionally shot by Israeli snipers.
Children in the Gaza Strip are intentionally shot by Israeli snipers, says orthopedic surgeon Dr. Mark Perlmutter from North Carolina, who was there during the end of April and first few weeks of May.
— The Cradle (@TheCradleMedia) July 23, 2024
Perlmutter told CBS News Sunday Morning on 21 July that throughout all his… pic.twitter.com/jUtzLrpkHb
Contrary to the ‘big lie,’ Israel killed ‘hundreds’ of its own people on October 7, blamed Hamas
As is common with “the big lie” propaganda technique, the state and its acolytes in the media often inverse the truth in their constant repetitions, boldly accusing their adversaries of the crimes they themselves commit.
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR DAILY HEADLINES US Canada Catholic
Thus, as the Jewish Virtual Library explains, “even though the facts which prove” such statements to be outrageous lies “may be brought clearly” to the minds of the public, many people “will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation.”
Netanyahu, whom Jewish journalist Max Blumenthal describes as the “genocidal criminal of the century,” went on to tell Congress that Hamas wants “Palestinian civilians to die so that Israel will be smeared in the international media and be pressured to end the war.”
READ: Israeli soldiers celebrate the ‘torturing, humiliating, and mocking’ of Palestinians on social media
Yet earlier in the speech, the foreign head of government repeated to Congress the often incomplete propaganda refrain that Hamas had “butchered 1,200 people” as a result of the October 7 raid while withholding the well-established facts reported by the Israeli press that perhaps hundreds of the 1,139 Israeli deaths, including 782 unarmed civilians, were killed by the Israeli forces themselves through indiscriminate fire and even the deliberate targeting of homes and vehicles where Israeli hostages were known to be present.
This means that after Netanyahu’s army deliberately killed many of its own citizens, his nation’s propaganda ministry, which has firm roots in the Western press, even in the so-called “alternative media,” continues to lie, “smearing” their adversaries by blaming them for these barbarous murders they intentionally committed against their own people in order to pursue an advantage in the international press themselves.
On October 7, Israel killed ‘more Jews than any other anti-Semite in recent history’
This irony was thus explained by Blumenthal in a July 13 interview when he observed that “the Israeli army has been confirmed as a leading participant in what Vice President Kamala Harris called ‘the worst atrocity against the Jewish people since the Holocaust.’”
“And Israel’s whole mission, its reason to exist, is supposed to be to keep Jews safe. And here they are killing more Jews than any other anti-Semite in recent history and doing it deliberately for political reasons,” he observed.
Furthermore, the purpose of inflating the death toll with these atrocities and propaganda was for Israel “to give itself more political space to destroy all of Gaza, kill a large percentage of the population and commit genocide,” Blumenthal continued. And when the inflated numbers were not sufficient to fulfill these ends, “they concocted ‘mass rape,’ ‘beheaded babies,’ (and) ‘fetuses cut from women.’ But it all started with first exaggerating the death toll.”
READ: Israel used ‘Hannibal Directive’ to kill its own people on October 7, local media reports
Therefore, with the Middle East prime minister also ironically framing the conflict as “a clash between barbarism and civilization” for his American audience last week, radio host Scott Horton agreed, stating, “Netanyahu is right that it’s barbarianism versus civilization, but he clearly is the barbarian.”
This is further confirmed by his public statements erroneously citing “a 3,000-year-old text (the Old Testament) for permission explicitly to kill innocent men, women, and children” while providing such genocidal instructions to the Israeli military, he said.
As recognized by close observers for months, including Colonel Douglas Macgregor, the Zionist project has had a long-standing goal of expelling the Palestinian people, including Christians, from the land they have lived on for centuries. The Israelis have made this goal “abundantly clear off and on for many years. This is not a secret. Now it’s happening.”
READ: Col. Macgregor: The ‘top priority’ for Israel is to make Gaza ‘unlivable,’ expel all survivors
‘Big lie’ inversion of truth further displayed in ‘human shield’ mantra
The Jewish Virtual Library entry goes on to explain that “in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility” because “the broad masses of a nation” would never consider fabricating “colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously” themselves. And thus, when the false propaganda is so often repeated, they will still doubt even clear facts that counter this narrative presenting the very opposite to be the truth.
Thus, the Israelis’ “big lie” inversion of the truth is further displayed in the long-repeated claim that Palestinians commit the international crime of using their own people as “human shields” that is intended to provide the Israeli army with a supposed propaganda alibi for their massive slaughter of tens of thousands of children and women in the last 10 months, and many more over the last several decades.
Netanyahu was sure to include this repeated reference in his speech, stating that “a senior Hamas official” had “boasted that Palestinian women and children ‘excel at being human shields.’”
The reality: Israel guilty of using human shields to a colossal degree, even as a formal policy
The only problem is for many years it has been clear there is virtually no evidence for Palestinians using human shields, even while, ironically, the evidence is decisive that the Israeli army has routinely committed this international crime themselves, for decades, and even as an exercise of established policy.
In 2005, the Guardian reported how the Israeli high court sought to put the practice to an end ruling “that the (Israeli) army’s long-standing practice of using Palestinian civilians as human shields in combat is illegal under international law” and must come to an end.
The original case had been filed by “human rights organizations that said the army routinely forced Palestinian civilians into dangerous situations as a means to protect soldiers. Some of the most common methods were to force Palestinians into buildings to see if they were booby-trapped, or to enter the hideouts of wanted men and tell them to surrender. Soldiers also forced civilians to stand in front of them when on patrol.”
So insistent upon maintaining the practice of using Palestinians, including children, as human shields, the Israeli military even sought to appeal the decision of their nation’s high court at the time in order to continue practicing this international war crime.
In regard to the current conflict, reports of such continued criminality include a harrowing account of the Israeli army forcing Palestinian men to stand as human shields while “the soldiers took cover behind them during a firefight with Palestinian resistance fighters.” Other reports from this summer reveal at least one injured Palestinian man being strapped to the hood of an Army vehicle in the West Bank for the same purpose.
In regard to the current conflict, reports of such continued criminality include a harrowing account of the Israeli army forcing Palestinian men to stand as human shields while “the soldiers took cover behind them during a firefight with Palestinian resistance fighters.” Other reports from this summer reveal at least one injured Palestinian man being strapped to the hood of an Army vehicle in the West Bank for the same purpose.
Israeli and U.S. leaders frequently accuse Palestinian groups like Hamas of using civilians as human shields.
— AJ+ (@ajplus) July 24, 2024
But Israel’s military has been forcing Palestinians to shield its soldiers for decades – at one point, it was even official policy.
(with @Dena & @_ZachFoster) pic.twitter.com/r3X1rjX849
Thus, despite decades of Israeli propaganda relentlessly telling this “colossal untruth” that Palestinians use human shields, the opposite has been the case with the Israeli army routinely abusing Palestinians in this way, including children, in violation of international law. And such facts should help the objective reader recognize this big liewhich has been relentlessly spread, not only by Netanyahu, but by the extensive Israeli propaganda ministry, including the U.S. government and media, for many decades.
Netanyahu’s weaponized calumnies: ‘useful idiot’ protesters funded by Iran?
In fact, the prime minister has been widely quoted explicitly endorsing a form of the “big lie” tactic, once telling Likud Party loyalists in 2001, “It doesn’t matter if justice is on your side. You have to depict your position as just.”
Apparently attempting such a depiction to repress dissent, the foreign potentate utilized absurd calumny against the thousands of American protesters who had descended upon Washington to demonstrate against him and the ongoing genocide in Gaza.
Anti-Zionist Jews were among tens of thousands Today near the U.S. Capitol at the “National Mobilization—All Out to the Capitol” protest against war criminal Benjamin Netanyahu while he addressed the U.S. Congress.
— Neturei Karta (@NetureiKarta) July 25, 2024
“Benjamin Netanyahu does not speak for world Jewry; Israel does… pic.twitter.com/ASXA1DrG0p
With Jews themselves often serving as the vanguard of these protests, including family members of Israeli hostages who were arrested in the House of Representatives chamber for wearing T-shirts protesting the prime minister, Netanyahu suggested, absent any evidence, that the protesters were being funded by Iran.
For all we know, Iran is funding the anti-Israel protests that are going on right now, outside this building … well, I have a message for these protesters. When the tyrants of Tehran, who hang gays from cranes and murder women for not covering their hair, are praising, promoting, and funding you, you have officially become Iran’s useful idiots.
Again, the ironies abound. First, while there is absolutely no evidence that Iran is funding these protesters, it is conclusively evident that the Israel Lobby in the U.S. has, in the words of military and political analyst Scott Ritter, “bought and paid for” the U.S. Congress that provided the foreign prime minister with almost one standing ovation per minute in a one-hour speech.
Irony: Israel Lobby’s funding of Congress reduces U.S. to an ‘extension’ of ‘genocidal’ state
“Israel has bragged about buying the U.S. Congress,” the former U.S. Marines Corps intelligence officer conveyed in a recent interview. “And this is the result, where a war criminal, a man who has been accused of genocide, who has arrest warrants being prepared for him by the International Court of Justice, a man who heads a state (Israel) that has been defined legally as an apartheid state, carrying out an illegal and unjust occupation, and again, genocide of the Palestinian people, has demanded an audience to the Congress that he has bought and paid for.”
“This is the U.S. Congress obeying the commands of the man who leads the nation (Israel) that owns the U.S. Congress,” Ritter continued. “And they own the White House as well. They own the president. They own both candidates for president. This is the sad reality of the political situation in the United States today. We don’t act as a sovereign nation. We act basically as an extension of this genocidal entity known as Israel.”
According to Netanyahu’s reasoning, this would therefore mean the vast majority of the U.S. Congress remains highly compensated “useful idiots” who have become accomplices in the international war crime of genocide against Palestinian Christians, Muslims and other religious minorities as well.
Israel’s propaganda operations employing paid ‘useful idiot’ protesters well documented
And a further examination reveals that, again, it is the Zionist movement that is guilty of paying protesters to create an illusion of strong grassroots support for Israel that polls in the U.S. regularly reveal to be lacking.
In a 2018 four-part Al Jazeera documentary — which had been censored by its own network due to pressure from the U.S. government and incensed Zionist lobbyists — undercover footage is presented revealing young adults participating in a fellowship program for Washington, D.C.-based organizations, being required by their employers to act as “foot soldiers” of the Zionist movement and to engage individuals at a pro-Palestinian conference happening at George Mason University.
Though the young protesters were generally employed to assist in the broader “conservative movement,” one young participant complained that they had been “forced” to participate in this Zionist activity with another confirming that their supervisor designated their presence as “mandatory.”
A third young man complained that he had not been sufficiently convinced to support the cause, was not committed to it, and yet he and his friend “sold out to the Jewish conspiracy for money” anyway at a price of “$50,000 plus benefits.”
Addressing these tactics in the documentary, Blumenthal said, these Zionist organizations were “manufacturing the image of a grassroots movement with corporate money by basically paying people to appear as activists. It just shows how little actual grassroots power they have and how all of their power is at the top.”
Political irony: Pro-abort pols boycott as almost all ‘pro-life’ members applaud ‘war criminal’
The growing disapproval of Israel’s genocidal attack upon the people of Gaza and the West Bank has reinforced massive support for the State of Palestine internationally, and now, perhaps, begun to show signs of making inroads into the U.S. political environment as well.
READ: UN member states deepen isolation of Israel, US by voting 153 to 10 for immediate ceasefire in Gaza
In the aftermath of Netanyahu’s speech, Jewish Voice for Peace sought to identify a silver lining by proclaiming “the demise of the bipartisan consensus on Israel” since“over 130 Democrats boycotted” the foreign prime minister’s presentation.
“In a desperate attempt to make this authoritarian leader appear popular, seats were filled with guests, rather than elected officials,” the JVP tweet explained. “The far-right agenda of groups like AIPAC that seek to back Israel’s crimes against humanity are growing more toxic by the day, and the will of American voters who want a human-rights centered foreign policy is breaking through.”
The Democrats boycotting the Israeli leader were ironically all pro-abortion and included Nancy Pelosi, Bernie Sanders, and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
Netanyahu is not only a war criminal. He is a liar.
— Bernie Sanders (@BernieSanders) July 24, 2024
All humanitarian organizations agree: Tens of thousands of children face starvation because his extremist government continues to block aid.
Israelis want him out of office. So he came to Congress to campaign.
The further irony is every self-identified pro-life member of Congress except one attended the speech by Netanyahu, who since last October has presided over the killingof more than 16,250 children and the injuring of 38,000 more with mostly American munitions approved and paid for by the U.S. Congress.
The lone exception is Rep. Thomas Massie, who recently made headlines for exposing “the Zionist lobby’s power over Congress” in a June 7 interview with Tucker Carlson.
The Republican from Kentucky tweeted last week, “Today Congress will undertake political theater on behalf of the State Department. The purpose of having Netanyahu address Congress is to bolster his political standing in Israel and to quell int’l opposition to his war. I don’t feel like being a prop so I won’t be attending.”
Also making his voice heard was Rev. Munther Isaac, a Lutheran pastor in Bethlehem who has become a prominent voice in the West representing the assessment of the conflict from Christians in the region since his April interview with Carlson.
Posting a photo on Twitter/X of Democrat and Palestinian American Rep. Rashida Tlaib in the House chamber holding a sign up to Netanyahu reading “GUILTY OF GENOCIDE,” the pastor wrote, “Gaza has become the moral compass of the world. I want you to look in the mirror and ask: where was I when Gaza was going through a genocide.”
“Gaza has become the moral compass of the world..
— Munther Isaac منذر اسحق (@MuntherIsaac) July 24, 2024
I want you to look in the mirror and ask: where was I when Gaza was going through a genocide” pic.twitter.com/V6ws76rfVM
BREAKING VIDEO: James O’Keefe Predicts Multiple Black Swan Events To Stop Trump
Kamala Harris Loves Transgender Child Mutilation and Other Degenerate LGBTQIAAP2S+ Perversion
Last summer, Vice President Kamala Harris hosted an LGBTQ+ Pride Month reception at her official Washington, D.C., residence, this marking the second time that a sitting vice president has ever done such a thing – the first one was held in 2022, also by Kamala at her personal D.C. residence.
Kamala appeared in the following photo, taken on June 28, 2023, alongside a “trans woman,” also known as a biological male, named “Sasha Colby” who moonlights as a drag queen. Drag queens were featured front and center at Kamala’s 2022 pride shindig, as well as again at this year’s 2024 pride celebration.
On all three pride occasions, Kamala made sure to prominently feature drag queens in order to keep them at the forefront and in the spotlight as part of her agenda. Kamala also loves bringing drag queens to public schools where innocent children are exposed to their perversions.
Kamala openly supports two new laws signed by California Gov. Gavin Newsom that allow teachers and administrators to deceive or keep secret from parents their children’s “trans” or “gay” identities, all the while giving instructors free rein to indoctrinate children into the Cult of LGBTQ+ in the classroom.
The second Newsom law Kamala supports allows parents from other states where such abominations are prohibited to come to California to undergo “transition” procedures there instead, even if a child’s other parent opposes the mutilations.
(Fact check: Joe Biden did appoint Kamala Harris to be America’s open borders czar.)
Kamala Harris has never prosecuted a single case of sexual abuse by pedophiles
Those familiar with Kamala’s political career know that she used to be District Attorney of San Francisco as well as Attorney General of California. In neither position did Kamala ever even once prosecute a case of child sexual abuse by pedophiles.
Not only did Kamala let pedophiles off the hook, she also went a step further to protect them by hiding their records showing sex crimes against children. In other words, Kamala loves pedophiles and could be one herself.
Kamala has further ties to a political action committee (PAC) called the DRAG PAC that has as its mission to “educate, invigorate and motivate the LGBTQ voter base.”
“DRAG PAC is a collective of DRAG entertainers and seasoned queer professionals who have banded together to educate, invigorate and motivate the LGBTQ voter base,” the highly corrupt ActBlue donations website explains.
The DRAG PAC is expected to donate large sums of cash to the Kamala campaign since Kamala is one of the LGBTQ+ community’s loudest supporters. Kamala also wants the federal government to eliminate all biological links to sex and gender by recognizing transgenderism, also known as gender dysphoria, as normal rather than a sign of serious mental illness.
“Take careful note of the type of person that Kamala is,” one commenter wrote.
Another quoted Romans 1:28-32 as a description of Kamala’s voter base:
“And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a debased mind, to do those things which are not fitting; being filled with all unrighteousness, sexual immorality, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, evil-mindedness; they are whisperers, backbiters, haters of God, violent, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, undiscerning, untrustworthy, unloving, unforgiving, unmerciful; who, knowing the righteous judgment of God, that those who practice such things are deserving of death, not only do the same but also approve of those who practice them.”
“Can anyone find a righteous man (or woman) in D.C.?” asked another. “This sickness has permeated everything.”
More related news about the LGBTQ+ takeover of the world, visit Transhumanism.news.
BREAKING VIDEO: James O’Keefe Predicts Multiple Black Swan Events To Stop Trump
FLASHBACK: Kamala Wants Gov. to Take Action on Gun Confiscation
On Wednesday Alex Jones covered the long and colored history of Kamala Harris calling for various types of firearm confiscation programs throughout her career in politics.
Don’t miss:
BREAKING VIDEO: James O’Keefe Predicts Multiple Black Swan Events To Stop Trump
First US F-16s Arrive in Ukraine
The first batch of US-made F-16 fighter jets has arrived in Ukraine, Bloomberg reported on Wednesday. The number of warplanes is “small,” sources told the outlet on condition of anonymity. Kiev has yet to comment on the reported delivery.
The origin of the aircraft is not yet clear. Last year, a group of NATO states, including Denmark, the Netherlands, Belgium, Canada, Luxembourg, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, and Sweden, formed the so-called ‘F-16 coalition’. Greece, the US, Bulgaria, and France later joined.
While some countries, including the Netherlands and Denmark, pledged to provide Kiev with 24 and 19 aircraft respectively from their own stocks, others committed to training Ukrainian pilots.
Norway has also recently stated that it would donate six fighter jets to Kiev.
READ MORE: US announces supply of F-16 missiles to Ukraine – WSJ
According to the sources cited by Bloomberg, a delivery deadline set for the end of this month has been “respected.” Earlier in July, the outgoing Dutch government said all preparations for the delivery of F-16s had been finished and the transfer would take place “soon.”
It is unclear whether the Ukrainian pilots trained to operate the aircraft by Kiev’s Western backers can immediately make use of the warplanes, Bloomberg noted.
A spokeswoman for the Ukrainian Defense Ministry, Diana Davityan, declined to comment on the issue when contacted by the news outlet.
Moscow has repeatedly stated that F-16s, just like the other Western weapons provided to Kiev, will not change the outcome of the conflict. The Russian military will destroy the planes as it has done with other Ukrainian hardware, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said earlier this year.
Last week, Kiev’s top military commander, Colonel General Aleksandr Syrsky, admitted to The Guardian that the Ukrainian military would have to limit the use of F-16s to avoid them being shot down by Russian forces. Moscow has “superior aviation” and “very strong” air defenses, the general said at that time, adding that the US-made aircraft would have to stay dozens of kilometers away from the front lines to avoid serious risk.
READ MORE: Ukraine’s top general reveals F-16 deployment limits
A private Russian company earlier offered a bounty of 15 million rubles ($170,000) for the destruction of the first F-16 in the conflict.
Russia has on multiple occasions warned that the ever-increasing level of support that Western states are providing to Kiev will only prolong the conflict and human suffering. Continued deliveries of ever-heavier weapons to Ukraine also make Kiev’s Western backers de facto participants of the conflict, it said. Top officials in Moscow, including President Vladimir Putin, have referred to the Ukraine crisis as a proxy war waged by Washington and its NATO allies against Russia.
BREAKING VIDEO: James O’Keefe Predicts Multiple Black Swan Events To Stop Trump
Senate Passes Kids’ ‘Safety’ Bills Despite Privacy, Digital ID, and Censorship Concerns
Two bills combined – the Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA) and the Children and Teens’ Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA 2.0) – have passed in the US Senate in a 91-3 vote, and will now be considered by the House.
Criticism of the bills focuses mainly on the likelihood that, if and when they become law, they will help expand online digital ID verification, as well as around issues like censorship (removal and blocking of content).
Related: The 2024 Digital ID and Online Age Verification Agenda
The effort to make KOSA and COPA 2.0 happen was spearheaded by a parent group that was pushing lawmakers and tech companies’ executives to move in this direction, and their main demand was to enact new rules that would prevent cyberbullying and other harms.
And now the main sponsors, senators Richard Blumenthal, a Democrat, and Republican Marsha Blackburn are trying to dispel these concerns, suggesting these are not “speech bills” and do not (directly) impose age verification.
Further defending the bills, they say that the legislation does not mandate that internet platforms start collecting even more user data, and reject the notion it is invasive of people’s privacy.
But the problem is that although technically true, this interpretation of the bills’ impact is ultimately incorrect, as some of their provisions do encourage censorship, facilitate the introduction of digital ID for age verification, and leave the door open for mass collection of online users’ data – under specific circumstances – and end ending anonymity online.
The bills are hailed by supporters as “landmark” legislation that is the first to focus on protecting children on the internet in the last 20 years, with some lawmakers in the Senate, like majority leader, Democrat Chuck Schumer, describing the result of the vote as “a momentous day.”
But digital rights group Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) is describing KOSA in particular as “a terrible idea” and is, instead of positive sloganeering about protecting the children, delving deeper into what the bills in fact seek to mandate or pave the way for.
The EFF is convinced that they should never become law and is urging citizens to take action to stop Congress from adopting KOSA. The overall criticism is that long-existing problems plaguing youths – such as mental disorders, drug, alcohol, and tobacco abuse, etc., should not be linked to the internet as if these issues weren’t present before.
EFF believes that the bill is in fact designed to “punish bad internet speech,” and makes a point prior to the House vote – appearing to warn about possible politicization – that once it becomes law, it will be out of the hands of the members of Congress to implement it.
Instead, the task would be entrusted to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), which EFF makes sure to note is “majority-controlled by the president’s party.”
The group said that lawmakers supporting KOSA have chosen to ignore that “the vast majority of speech that KOSA affects is constitutionally protected in the US, which is why there is a long list of reasons that KOSA is unconstitutional.”
KOSA – although stating that platforms are not required to implement age verification – is seen by opponents as paving the way for expansion of this controversial policy, as it wants FTC, FCC, and the Secretary of Commerce to study “options for developing systems to verify age at the device or operating system level.”
Censorship-wise, it allows the FTC to investigate and sue sites that are branded as serving content “harmful” to children. And unlike the previous versions which covered only certain platforms, guided by the number of users, revenue, etc., the bill now appears to cover all platforms, which, unless the wording is changed, would be a fairly drastic provision.
When it comes to privacy and data collection, despite claims to the contrary, platforms will be able to collect or buy data on people with the goal of estimating a user’s age.
According to Senator Blumenthal, this happens “if an online platform already knows that a user is underage.”
How a platform might know that aside, the senator adds, “then it has to provide the safety and privacy protections required by the legislation -the platform cannot bury its head in the sand when it knows a user is underage.”
“Online platforms often already request a date of birth from new users, either for advertising and profiling the user or for compliance with the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA). Online platforms also frequently collect or purchase substantial amounts of other data to understand more about their users,” Blumenthal has said.
AS for COPPA 2.0, it also indirectly pushes for more age verification thanks to the new restrictions on the collection of data from minors. And while the bill doesn’t mandate age verification – platforms that want to collect data or target ads will have to verify the users’ age.
One way to abuse this provision for censorship is the same as what has been happening with the first iteration of COPPA – put creators in a position (say, through specific platform rules) to mark content as safe for children, which means it becomes restricted, and demonetized (stripped of ads).
BREAKING VIDEO: James O’Keefe Predicts Multiple Black Swan Events To Stop Trump