News

Trump Campaign Managers Have Dark History of Undermining Trump

Trump Campaign Managers Have Dark History of Undermining Trump

adminAug 14, 20245 min read
Is it time for President Donald Trump to call Susie Wiles and Chris LaCivita into the boardroom and tell them, “You’re fired”?

President Donald Trump’s campaign co-managers Susie Wiles and Chris LaCivita have a dark history of undermining President Trump and the values of the Make America Great Again movement. 

LaCivita, an ex-partner in the Fp1 Strategies firm co-founded by Jeb Bush’s former campaign manager Danny Diaz, and Wiles recently gained the scorn of MAGA Nation when they effectively destroyed the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025 initiative to try to replace entrenched Swamp bureaucrats with pro-Trump staffers in the next administration. 

After LaCivita orchestrated the ouster of Project 2025 leader Paul Dans from the project, Wiles and LaCivita actually put out a statement declaring, “Reports of Project 2025’s demise would be greatly welcomed and should serve as notice to anyone or any group trying to misrepresent their influence with President Trump and his campaign — it will not end well for you.”

How can President Trump drain the Swamp when his own path back to the White House is being guided by two Swamp Thing creatures?

On January 6, 2021, Chris LaCivita liked a Democrat congresswoman’s tweet calling for President Trump to be removed from office using the 25th Amendment. LaCivita’s unfortunate “like” was unearthed by George News, which posts with the handle @TheGeorgeHQ on X.

Trump Campaign Managers Have Dark History of Undermining Trump

Chris LaCivita thought Jeb! would laugh his way to beating Trump. In a New York Times piece from August 2015, LaCivita actually said that he thought Trump would die a political death and that the Jeb Bush campaign was “laughing” with joy at Trump’s presence in the race. 

“Privately, Mr. Bush’s top strategists, who have become increasingly  fixated on halting Mr. Walker, believe that Mr. Trump is nothing short of a godsend,” the New York Times reported, which seems hilarious in hindsight.

“It’ll be death by 100 cuts, and he’s probably only in his 20s,” Chris LaCivita said of Donald Trump, according to the Times piece, which quoted LaCivita as saying that Jeb Bush’s campaign team was “laughing their way through the summer.”

America ended up laughing at Jeb! and at the political know-nothings who did not take Trump seriously.

Chris LaCivita is a Woke politico whose views completely contradict the messaging genius that elevated Donald Trump to the presidency in the first place. Whereas former Trump 2016 campaign manager Corey Lewandowski famously told the campaign team to “Let Trump Be Trump,” LaCivita supports the muzzling of Republican politicians so that their words cannot be “construed” badly.

“Republicans have to be very strong and very forceful and very quick in condemning any type of activity that could be construed as intolerant. I mean, they just need to be,” Chris LaCivita said in a University of Virginia Center for Politics panel after the 2018 midterm elections, where he was joined by Democrat operative Donna Brazile. Talk about a losing strategy!

Susie Wiles, meanwhile, is a well-known Swamp creature. Wiles is reportedly a “friend” of establishment RINO anti-Trump political hack and former Jeb! Bush operative Tim Miller, according to a 2016 Tampa Bay Times article that characterized Wiles as “a genteel, chamber of commerce, establishment Republican.” 

Wiles knows Miller from when Wiles ran the ill-fated presidential campaign of establishment candidate Jon Huntsman. The article describes how Wiles’ ex-boss, former Jacksonville mayor John Delaney (who cast a write-in vote for Paul Ryan for president) tried to talk Wiles out of working for Trump by stating, “Susie, I don’t think this is who you are.”

In the article, Susie Wiles said that “I blanch sometimes” in regard to Trump’s conduct. According to the Oxford Dictionary, to “blanch” means “to flinch or grow pale from shock, fear, or a similar emotion.” But Wiles decided to work for Trump anyway.

As I previously reported, Susie Wiles joined Mercury Public Affairs as a co-chair in 2022, and in that position Wiles worked with Mercury’s managing director Robert Jones, who previously worked for Pfizer for 19 years including as Pfizer’s senior vice president of government relations and public affairs.

Remember the 2020 election overtime period when Trump’s then-campaign manager Bill Stepien totally threw Trump under the bus and refused to fight against the widespread election fraud that Sidney Powell and Rudy Giuliani and MAGA Nation were committed to fighting? Trump supporters remember it, and Trump supporters know that it could happen again. How can President Trump go into the most important election in American history with campaign managers who have spent their careers working against everything Trump Nation stands for?

Is it time for President Donald Trump to call Susie Wiles and Chris LaCivita into the boardroom and tell them, “You’re fired”?


Alex Jones Issues Emergency Warning: If Not Stopped, The Globalists Will Collapse Civilization And Create Hell On Earth
61 Yr Old Brit Gets 18 Month Prison Sentence For Chanting “Who The F**k Is Allah”

61 Yr Old Brit Gets 18 Month Prison Sentence For Chanting “Who The F**k Is Allah”

adminAug 14, 20241 min read

61 Yr Old Brit Gets 18 Month Prison Sentence For Chanting “Who The F**k Is Allah”

A 61-year-old man from has been sentenced to eighteen monthis in prison for shouting obscenities during a recent UK protest. The non violent pensioner was chanting “who the fuck is Allah” and telling police officers […]

The post 61 Yr Old Brit Gets 18 Month Prison Sentence For Chanting “Who The F**k Is Allah” appeared first on The People’s Voice.

Pesticide Use Increases Cancer Rates of Those Nearby — Study

Pesticide Use Increases Cancer Rates of Those Nearby — Study

adminAug 14, 20244 min read
There’s homicide, suicide and pesticide. All of them involve death.

A recent study has found that living near farms that spray harmful chemical pesticides increases cancer rates.

“Our findings demonstrated an association between pesticide use and increased incidence of leukemia; non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma; bladder, colon, lung, and pancreatic cancer; and all cancers combined that are comparable to smoking for some cancer types,” the study said in the ‘Abstract’ section.

The chemicals used to kill pests also affect humans as well, however pesticide use can boost agricultural output by 15 to 50 percent, increasing money flows, according to the study in the ‘Introduction’ section.

Another thing that gets the money flowing aside from increased agricultural production is cancer treatment. Conveniently pesticide use aids not only in the increase of crop yields but also the increase of cancer treatments as well.

“…exposure to pesticides has been associated with numerous harmful health effects, including neurological disorders such as Parkinson’s disease, increased risk for various cancers, and altered immune function,” the study said in the ‘Introduction’ section.

Although much work has been conducted on confirming the link between direct pesticide exposure and cancer, little work had been done on the exposure risk to the surrounding community, until now.

“Overall, a comprehensive assessment of cancer risk from a public and a population health perspective in the United States is non-existent. Our study aims to fill in that gap,” the study said in the ‘Introduction’ section.

The researchers looked at the geographic spread of pesticide use and corresponding geographical spread of cancer cases from 3,143 counties.

“To achieve this, we first matched all databases using county Federal Information Processing Standard (FIPS) codes. Then we developed agricultural pesticide use pattern profiles using an LCA approach to pesticide use alone. After that, we performed a comprehensive analysis to determine the effect of agricultural pesticide use patterns and covariates on cancer incidence,” the study said in the ‘Methods’ section.

Smoking was found to be just as safe as living near pesticide use.

“Pesticides have a significant effect on increasing cancer risk for all the cancer types evaluated, however, in a way that is only matched by smoking prevalence,” the study said in the ‘Results’ section.

Pesticide Use Increases Cancer Rates of Those Nearby — Studyhttps://www.frontiersin.org/files/Articles/1368086/fcacs-02-1368086-HTML/image_m/fcacs-02-1368086-g004.jpg

“…we produced national maps that represent the contrast of regions with the pesticide use associated with higher added cancer risk using the lowest region as a reference. In these maps, we highlight shocking estimates of additional cancer cases per year adjusted to the total population of the United States,” the study said in the ‘Results’ section.

Interestingly, the spread of various cancers was different for different regions.

https://www.frontiersin.org/files/Articles/1368086/fcacs-02-1368086-HTML/image_m/fcacs-02-1368086-g005.jpg

Some crops have been genetically modified to produce pesticide within the food itself, while others have been genetically modified in order to not die when herbicides are sprayed on them. Notably, humans have not undergone those genetic modifications in order to not die when sprayed with those chemicals.


WARNING— SHOCK VIDEOS: German And UK Governments Use Children To Lure Islamicists To Europe For Sex


dummy-img

General Motors Sued by Texas AG for Scooping-Up & Selling Driver’s Private Data to Corporations & Insurance Companies

adminAug 14, 20245 min read
“Millions of American drivers wanted to buy a [modern] car, not a comprehensive surveillance system that unlawfully records information about every drive they take and sells their data to any company willing to pay for it,” Attorney General Paxton said in a press release.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has filed a lawsuit against General Motors (GM) for ‘deceptive and unlawful business practices’ related to the automobile manufacturing giant’s collection and sale of private driving data of Texans that chose to own modern vehicles to corporations and insurance companies.

“Our investigation revealed that General Motors has engaged in egregious business practices that violated Texans’ privacy and broke the law. We will hold them accountable,” Attorney General Paxton said in a press release Tuesday. “Companies are using invasive technology to violate the rights of our citizens in unthinkable ways. Millions of American drivers wanted to buy a car, not a comprehensive surveillance system that unlawfully records information about every drive they take and sells their data to any company willing to pay for it.”

Infowars previously reported on the spy devices known as modern automobiles.

Modern automobiles, roughly vehicles manufactured in about the last decade, are often equipped with a variety of systems including technology that can control where and when drivers are allowed to drive, track driver’s eyeballs, record occupant conversations, collect genetic and health information, biometrics and weight of drivers and passengers, causing auto insurance premiums to be increased and even monitor driver’s sexual activity.

While the lawsuit only involves Texans who made the decision to drive around in spy devices made by GM instead of older cars, the number of individuals affected number 1.5 million.

“General Motors used technology installed in most 2015 model year or newer GM vehicles to collect, record, analyze, and transmit highly detailed driving data about each time a driver used their vehicle. General Motors sold this information to several other companies, including to at least two companies for the purpose of generating “Driving Scores” about GM’s customers and selling these scores to insurance companies,” the Attorney General’s press release said Tuesday. “General Motors deceived many of its customers when it compelled them to enroll in its products, including OnStar Smart Driver, as part of its vehicle “onboarding” process and told them that failing to enroll would result in the deactivation of their vehicle’s safety features. Unbeknownst to customers, however, by enrolling in GM’s products, they were “agreeing” to General Motors’ collection and sale of their data. Despite lengthy and convoluted disclosures, General Motors never informed its customers of its actual conduct—the systematic collection and sale of their highly detailed driving data.”

Paxton opened an investigation into several automobile manufacturers for this reason in June.

“The Texas Deceptive Trade Practices – Consumer Protection Act authorizes the Office of the Attorney General to investigate false, misleading, or deceptive acts or practices,” the June press release from the Attorney General said. “Accordingly, car manufacturers and the third parties to whom they sold data are being instructed to produce documents relevant to their conduct. Additionally, they are being instructed to produce documents showing the disclosures they made to customers about the extent of their data collection practices and subsequent sale of their customers’ data.”

Denver7 News reported that new cars monitor their owners sex lives.

Paxton said that people who decided to own these spy machines on wheels were becoming worried about their purchases after discovering what they actually are.

“The technology in modern vehicles enables manufacturers to collect millions of data points about the people driving them,” Attorney General Paxton said in a June press release. “Recently, consumers have grown extremely concerned that their driving data is being reported to their insurance company without their knowledge or authorization. These reports of the invasive and unmitigated collection and sale of data without consumer consent are disturbing, and they merit a thorough investigation and appropriate enforcement.”

While cars of the last decade spy on their owners locations, conversations, body weight and sex life, cars of the future will directly plug into the brains of their owners in order to change them and affect how they drive.


WARNING— SHOCK VIDEOS: German And UK Governments Use Children To Lure Islamicists To Europe For Sex


Ukraine Accused Of Using Chemical Weapons In Kursk Region

Ukraine Accused Of Using Chemical Weapons In Kursk Region

adminAug 14, 20241 min read

Ukraine Accused Of Using Chemical Weapons In Kursk Region

Ukrainian forces have been accused of using chemical weapons in an attack on a group of power company workers in Russia’s Kursk Region. During a meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Monday, the Kursk […]

The post Ukraine Accused Of Using Chemical Weapons In Kursk Region appeared first on The People’s Voice.

UK Pensioner Jailed 18 Months For Calling Police ‘C**ts’ & Chanting ‘Who The F**k Is Allah?’

UK Pensioner Jailed 18 Months For Calling Police ‘C**ts’ & Chanting ‘Who The F**k Is Allah?’

adminAug 14, 20244 min read

UK Pensioner Jailed 18 Months For Calling Police ‘C**ts’ & Chanting ‘Who The F**k Is Allah?’

Nonviolent 61-year-old locked up by authoritarian regime

A 61-year-old man from the UK has been sentenced to a year and a half in prison for shouting obscenities at police officers during a recent protest.

British newspaper The Guardian basically doxxed the man, David Spring, by providing his street name in an article about his imprisonment.

Spring recently retired from his 42-year career as a train driver to care for his ill wife, but now he’ll be spending time behind bars until 2026.

That’s a lengthy sentence for the nonviolent “crime” of waving a finger at riot cops and shouting, “cunts,” at them.

The incident took place in Whitehall where citizens gathered to voice their frustrations about mass migration taking a toll on their city and country.

“Spring’s role in the disorder was shown on police body worn camera footage in court where he was seen making threatening and hostile gestures towards police, calling officers ‘c****’ and joining in chants of ‘you’re not English anymore’ and ‘who the f*** is Allah,’” reports the Guardian.

“Allah, Allah, who f*ck is Allah!” If you sing this in UK you will be arrested. It seems like a joke but it’s not. pic.twitter.com/arRxkoPjPt

— RadioGenoa (@RadioGenoa) August 13, 2024

Spring told arresting officers last week, “I didn’t go up to London to riot. I went to complain about people put up in hotels.” 

The judge who sentenced Spring said his actions had encouraged people “to engage in disorder” and that the harsh sentence was meant to make an example so others are apparently deterred from engaging in free speech at future demonstrations.

“What you did could and it seems did encourage others to engage in disorder,” the judge stated.

A former political strategist behind the X account The Stark Naked Brief pointed out even UK laws don’t allow for arrests over swearing at police officers.

The account’s post also noted the judge didn’t appear confident in his ruling because he used the words “could” and “seems.”

“This is not indicative of a strong burden of proof,” the post stated.

Some context on the Brit who was supposedly jailed for saying “who the f*ck is Allah”…

His name is David Spring.

He was a train driver for 42 years and recently retired.

According to reports, he got sentenced under a violent disorder charge not a vague “hate speech” charge.… pic.twitter.com/PX1FQ3RE6z

— The Stark Naked Brief. (@StarkNakedBrief) August 14, 2024

American activist Marc Emery pointed out Spring may be in physical danger while serving time since he’s being falsely mislabeled a far-right racist and UK jails have large Muslim populations.

Englishman David Spring got 18 months in prison today for this. Could be a death sentence for someone labeled as far right in UK prisons. Here’s what he did: https://t.co/0BKBPOI5mR pic.twitter.com/2952geBlo4

— Marc Emery (@MarcScottEmery) August 13, 2024

Footage of a UK judge recently went viral as it showed the dystopian state of the British government where another individual was jailed for 20 months over a Facebook post that stated the fact that many migrants go on to rape people in their new countries.

Watch Alex Jones’ take on the clip below:

The nightmarish assault on free speech in the UK will soon come to America if Democrats are able to somehow stop Donald Trump from retaking the White House.