Female Illegals Arrested for Stealing Thousands in Merchandise as ‘Organized Theft Ring’ Hits Florida
A pair of female illegal aliens were arrested in Florida for stealing thousands of dollars of merchandise from stores across the state in what authorities believe are the activities of an “organized retail theft ring.”
Just before 3 p.m. on Tuesday afternoon, the Charlotte County Sheriff’s Office (CCSO) was called by an employee at a Burlington Store in Port Charlotte where “two Hispanic females” were “in the act of committing theft,” CCSO explained in a press release.
CCSO deputies arrived and detained the women, who were observed loading around $400 of stolen goods into a 2024 Hyundai Tucson with California plates.
Deputies discovered large quantities of clothing and other merchandise from stores such as Marshall’s and Ross inside the vehicle.
CCSO estimated the total value of the booty at more than $6,250.
“The suspects were in possession of tools used to remove anti-theft devices from retail merchandise,” CCSO says.
“Both females were transported to the CCSO District 2 Office to be interviewed, where they each provided full confessions.”
They were identified as Carla Stephany Soto Araneda, 23, and Genesi Michael Flores Reyes, 22.
Both are illegally present in the U.S. but other details remain limited.
The women were being held in Charlotte County Jail as of Wednesday.
Charlotte County, FL: Two illegal aliens, Carla Stephany Soto Araneda and Genesi Michael Flores Reyes, were arrested for their part in a retail theft ring. pic.twitter.com/NV4mVIAMcc
— Illegal Alien Crimes (@ImmigrantCrimes) June 28, 2024
Investigators believe the suspects traveled to Florida from California and carried out thefts all across the state prior to their arrest.
“I’m not sure why the message isn’t getting through to these out-of-towners that think they are going to come into Charlotte County, commit crimes, and get away with it. We have proven, multiple times, that it won’t fly here,” Charlotte County Sheriff Bill Prummel warned in a statement.
“Although I try not to make a habit of giving criminals advice, I do want to suggest that if they are passing through my county, just pass right on through. Don’t even stop… don’t try your nonsense here.”
InfoWars has been documenting the surge of crime fueled by the ongoing Biden border invasion.
Nick Fuentes Talks Trump Assassination, Civil War, and WWIII With Alex Jones
Markets, Watch Out: Russia Threatens Retaliations Against US
“Retaliatory measures will definitely follow,” Kremlin officials promise the U.S. ambassador after a Ukrainian missile strike was allegedly conducted with U.S.-supplied weapons and intelligence.
“You should ask my colleagues in Europe, and above all in Washington, the press secretaries, why their governments are killing Russian children,” said Dmitry Peskov, Kremlin spokesperson, following Sunday’s strike on Crimea that injured more than 150 people and killed at least four. Bitterly adding: “We perfectly understand who is behind this.”
Russian officials claim not only that the weapons used in the attack were supplied by the U.S., but also that they were programmed and aimed by the U.S. military. That’s enough, according to the Kremlin, to make the U.S. “a party to the conflict,” a player in Ukraine’s so-called “proxy war.”
On Monday, a day after the Ukrainian strike on what it claims as its own territory, a Russian missile attack killed at least five people in the Ukrainian town of Pokrovsk, leaving both children and adults wounded. With retaliation on Ukraine swift, brutal, and decisive, Putin is now turning his attention toward plans for the U.S.
It won’t be hard for the Russian president to choose a move that will make the nation squirm, even without deploying the nuclear weapons he’s touting via sensationalist Western news outlets. Putin is unlikely to risk inflicting violence on a trade partner worth $5 billion (even after trade with the U.S. plummeted to near-USSR collapse levels).
But there’s one conspicuously sitting duck beneath the wheels of the Russian political machine. Evan Gershkovich, Wall Street Journal reporter, and American citizen, has been a prisoner of the regime for more than a year. His trial kicked off this week, putting the journalist in jeopardy of 20 years in prison if convicted of colluding with the CIA.
“The only people present in the court will be the judge, state prosecutor, the defendant, his lawyer, and a clerk,” lawyer Evengy Smirnov, who specializes in helping defendants like Gershkovich, told Reuters. “There is no doubt the Russian authorities initiated this case solely for political reasons”—which have only intensified since Gershkovich’s capture.
It’s an easy lever for Russian negotiations. Give us–, let us–, don’t fight back—or we’ll convict your man. The collateral for Gershkovich’s release could be almost anything. Prisoners, trade agreements, money, or investments may all be up for grabs and could radically alter the economic and political landscape surrounding high-value trade channels and resources.
Despite mounting tensions, Russia and Ukraine have apparently managed to swap 90 POWs following the mutual attacks, according to a statement from the Russian Defence Ministry. This is an oddly amicable move, possibly a sign that Putin is seizing on these attacks as an opportunity to target the U.S. economy rather than focusing on his Ukrainian adversaries.
It’s time to call the U.S.-Russia conflict what it is: an economic war fought with sanctions and trade rather than with guns. In this battlefield, currency is the weapon. And Putin is fortunate to have inflationary U.S. policy on his side in his fight to blow up U.S. market stability.
With all this economic and political upheaval, it may come as a surprise that gold prices have stumbled this week. This cooling, however, maybe only a breath before the plunge. More Fed data will be released later this week, letting investors know how much inflation to expect and how to profitably redistribute holdings. A highly cautious strategy would be waiting to enter the market until the close of the week, even if it means paying a “hesitancy tax” above current prices.
In the wake of Russian conflicts, it’s reasonable to expect shakeups in both precious and base metal markets. Russia is a significant supplier of platinum, and Ukrainian soil is rich in copper and lithium. Both countries will take hits in the coming cycle of mutual retaliation. Both are trade partners with the U.S. Both will transmit their own economic upheaval into global metals markets, squeezing supply chains, teasing threats of shortages in exchange for benefits, and driving prices ever-upward as investors fear limited access to resources.
It’s not yet clear which economic weapon Russia will fire. But the Kremlin wants the U.S. to know: You’ll find out soon.
“Of course, the involvement of the United States in the fighting, as a result of which peaceful Russians are dying, cannot but have consequences,” Kremlin spokesperson Peskov said. “Which ones exactly—time will tell.”
MUST WATCH: Dr. David Martin Interview — U.S. Gov. Is Coordinating A Depopulation Program Against The World
Various Covid Shot Batches Result in Various Rates of Side Effects — Study
A study published Thursday reaffirms the evidence that not all Covid shots are made equal, as some batches result in greater rates of serious adverse events (SAE) than others, confirming an earlier study on the topic.
“The authors analysed the number of adverse events (AEs) reported in connection with various batches of COMIRNATY vaccine in Denmark. In almost 11 million doses of 52 different BNT162b2 vaccine batches adminis- tered to approximately 4 million Danish individuals, they analysed approx. 43,000 AEs, finding batches with up to .1 reported AEs per dose as well as those with less than .0001 AEs per dose. Interestingly, the high-AE batches were all small (up to 100,000 doses), while the low-AE batches were much larger,” the study said in the ‘Introduction’ section.
Interestingly, batches released earlier in the vaccination campaign resulted in greater rates of adverse events.
NEW STUDY – High Variability in Adverse Event Reports Among COVID-19 Vaccine Batches
— McCullough Foundation (@McCulloughFund) June 28, 2024
A new study reveals a significant variability in the number of adverse event reports associated with different batches of COVID-19 vaccines from various manufacturers, aligning with trends… pic.twitter.com/AjRPR1Q9yl
A study from last year demonstrated the same phenomenon as well.
“The observed variation in SAE rates and seriousness between BTN162b2 vaccine batches in this nationwide study was contrary to the expected homogenous rate and distribution of SAEs between batches,” the study said. “Compared to the rates of all SAEs, serious SAEs and SAE-related deaths per 1.000 doses were much less frequent and numbers of these SAEs per 1000 doses displayed considerably greater variability between batches, with lesser separation between the three trendlines (not shown).”
The researchers in the 2023 study provided a chart showing various batches and their corresponding adverse events.

SCOTUS Overturns ‘Chevron Deference’ In Massive Blow To ‘Administrative State’
The Supreme Court has ruled to overturn the so-called ‘Chevron Deference’ dealing a huge blow to the so-called ‘administrative state’ that have enjoyed.
In an 6-3 decision along ideological lines, the Supreme Court’s conservative majority upended the 40-year administrative law precedent that gave agencies across the federal government leeway to interpret ambiguous laws through rulemaking.
Conservatives and Republican policymakers have long been critical of the doctrine, saying it has contributed to the dramatic growth of government and gives unelected regulators far too much power to make policy by going beyond what Congress intended when it approved various laws. The authority of regulatory agencies has been increasingly questioned by the Supreme Court in recent years.
Those on the other side say the Chevron doctrine empowers an activist federal government to serve the public interest in an increasingly complicated world without having to seek specific congressional authorization for everything that needs to be done.
As The Hill report, judges previously had to defer to agencies in cases where the law is ambiguous.
Now, judges will substitute their own best interpretation of the law, instead of deferring to the agencies – effectively making it easier to overturn regulations that govern wide-ranging aspects of American life.
This includes rules governing toxic chemicals, drugs and medicine, climate change, artificial intelligence, cryptocurrency and more.
The move hands a major victory to conservative and anti-regulatory interests that have looked to eliminate the precedent as part of a broader attack on the growing size of the “administrative state.”
The Biden administration defended the precedent before the high court.
As Mark Joseph Stern writes on X:
“Today’s ruling is a massive blow to the ‘administrative state’, the collection of federal agencies that enforce laws involving the environment, food and drug safety, workers’ rights, education, civil liberties, energy policy—the list is nearly endless.”“The Supreme Court’s reversal of Chevron constitutes a major transfer of power from the executive branch to the judiciary, stripping federal agencies of significant discretion to interpret and enforce ambiguous regulations.“
Chief Justice Roberts, writing the opinion of the court, argued Chevron “defies the command of” the Administrative Procedure Act, which governs federal administrative agencies.
He said it “requires a court to ignore, not follow, ‘the reading the court would have reached had it exercised its independent judgment as required by the APA.’”
Further, he said it “is misguided” because “agencies have no special competence in resolving statutory ambiguities. Courts do.”
The liberals on the court are not happy:
“In dissent, Justice Kagan says the conservative supermajority “disdains restraint, and grasps for power,” making “a laughingstock” of stare decisis and producing “large-scale disruption” throughout the entire government. She is both furious and terrified.”
As Stern concludes:
“Hard to overstate the impact of this seismic shift.”
Simply put, a massive win for the constitution…
Wow, this is a big deal for addressing overreaching regulation!
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 28, 2024
The decision comes one day after the Supreme Court curtailed federal agencies’ use of administrative law judges in another blow to the administrative state.
Read the full decision below:
High Court by Zerohedge Janitor
Illegal Alien Charged With Capital Murder in Killing of Two Victims at Texas Chick-Fil-A
An illegal alien from El Salvador is facing capital murder charges after allegedly shooting two people to death at a fast food restaurant in Texas this week, according to reports.
Just after 3:30 p.m. on Wednesday afternoon, a man entered a Chik-Fil-A in the city of Irving and shot two people inside before fleeing the scene.
Both victims, who were employees, were pronounced dead at the scene, NBC DFW reports.
Another worker who witnessed the shooting identified the suspect as her own husband and authorities launched a manhunt for 37-year-old Oved Bernardo Mendoza Argueta.
Mendoza Argueta was arrested hours later and booked into Irving City Jail on capital murder charges.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has lodged a detainer against Mendoza Argueta.
On Thursday, ICE confirmed with Fox News that Mendoza Argueta is illegally present in the U.S. but additional details are currently limited.
? BREAKING Irving City in Dallas County, TX: Early this morning Oved Bernardo Mendoza Argueta was arrested for Capital Murder of Multiple Persons.
He has an immigration detainer hold.
Reports state that he is the suspect in a targeted shooting that killed two people. pic.twitter.com/xTr7SubwBw— Illegal Alien Crimes (@ImmigrantCrimes) June 27, 2024
Officials reportedly believe the shooting was “a targeted incident and that this was not a random act of violence.”
An investigation is ongoing.
InfoWars has been documenting the surge of crime fueled by the ongoing Biden border invasion.
Nick Fuentes Talks Trump Assassination, Civil War, and WWIII With Alex Jones
Historic! Jack Posobiec & Charlie Kirk’s Debate Coverage Gets Over 12.5 MILLION Views on X! Legacy Media Is DEAD
Turning Point USA Founder Charlie Kirk & Human Events Senior Editor Jack Posobiec’s presidential debate coverage received a historic 12.6 million views on the social media platform X, further demonstrating how irrelevant legacy media is.
— Jack Poso ?? (@JackPosobiec) June 28, 2024
Their podcast, titled ‘Though Crime’ saw the colossal amount of views despite CNN’s efforts to shut down alternative media’s coverage of the event.
“The public has a right to see Presidential debates however they would like,” said X Boss Elon Musk earlier this week. “DMCA does not apply.”
The public has a right to see Presidential debates however they would like. DMCA does not apply.
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 25, 2024
This story is developing! Stay tuned!