News

The American Journal: Eclipse Day Arrives As Globalists Launch NWO Great Reset

The American Journal: Eclipse Day Arrives As Globalists Launch NWO Great Reset

adminApr 8, 20241 min read

The American Journal: Eclipse Day Arrives As Globalists Launch NWO Great Reset

Is the event being used as a massive ritual, a distraction or another purpose?

“The American Journal” is live every weekday from 8-11 am CST.

Follow The American Journal on Telegram:


CDC Discloses 780,000 New Reports of Serious Side Effects After Covid-19 Vaccination

CDC Discloses 780,000 New Reports of Serious Side Effects After Covid-19 Vaccination

adminApr 8, 20245 min read

CDC Discloses 780,000 New Reports of Serious Side Effects After Covid-19 Vaccination

Heart inflammation, miscarriages, seizures, unconsciousness, Bell’s palsy, and more were reported by shot recipients.

(LifeSiteNews) – This week, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) released 780,000 previously undisclosed reports about a wide array of adverse effects after COVID-19 vaccination, years after the federal government undertook an intensive campaign to delegitimize such talk as “harmful misinformation.”

The Epoch Times reported that the reports, submitted to the agency’s V-Safe reporting system, allege experiencing heart inflammation, miscarriages, seizures, unconsciousness, Bell’s palsy (a partial and temporary facial paralysis), and more. 

One shot recipient reported being taken by ambulance to an emergency room for “loss of consciousness and seizure immediately following injection.” Another reported, “For 24 hrs after shot I was so fatigued I could not stay awake. I also have some very strong suicidal thoughts. Zero appetite.” Still more expressed worry about potential allergic reactions.

The new information was released as a result of a January court order from U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk. It follows V-Safe data previously detailed by civil rights attorney Aaron Siri in a 2022 roundtable hosted by Republican U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin. That data revealed that 800,000 of the system’s 10 million participants, or approximately 7.7 percent, reported needing medical care after COVID injection. “Twenty-five percent of those people needed emergency care or were hospitalized, and another 48 percent sought urgent care,” Siri said at the time. “Also, another 25 percent on top of the 7.7 percent reported being unable to work or go to school.”

“When people report the same symptoms over and over again after getting a biological product — in this case ’shortness of breath’ and ‘heart palpitations,’ which are both symptoms of myocarditis, that has been causally linked to mRNA COVID shots — the public should be warned, not kept in the dark,” National Vaccine Information Center president Barbara Loe Fisher told Epoch of the newest revelations. “It raises questions about what else government health officials are hiding.”

significant body of evidence links significant risks to the COVID vaccines, which were developed and reviewed in a fraction of the time vaccines usually take under former President Donald Trump’s Operation Warp Speed initiative. Among it, the federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) reports 37,231 deaths, 214,906 hospitalizations, 21,524 heart attacks, and 28,214 myocarditis and pericarditis cases as of February 23, among other ailments. CDC researchers have recognized a “high verification rate of reports of myocarditis to VAERS after mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccination,” leading to the conclusion that “under-reporting is more likely” than over-reporting.

2010 report submitted to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services’ (HHS’s) Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality (AHRQ) warned that VAERS caught “fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events.” On the problem of under-reporting, the VAERS website offers only that “more serious and unexpected medical events are probably more likely to be reported than minor ones” (emphasis added).

In 2021, Project Veritas shed light on some of the reasons for such under-reporting with undercover video from inside Phoenix Indian Medical Center, a facility run under HHS’s Indian Health Service program in which emergency room physician Dr. Maria Gonzales laments that myocarditis cases go unreported “because they want to shove it under the mat,” and nurse Deanna Paris attests to seeing “a lot” of people who “got sick from the side effects” of the COVID shots, but “nobody” is reporting them to VAERS “because it takes over a half hour to write the damn thing.”

Recently, an analysis of 99 million people across eight countries published February in the journal Vaccine – the largest analysis to date – “observed significantly higher risks of myocarditis following the first, second and third doses” of mRNA-based COVID vaccines, as well as signs of increased risk of “pericarditis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis,” and other “potential safety signals that require further investigation.”

In Florida, a grand jury impaneled by Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis is currently investigating the manufacture and rollout of the COVID vaccines. In February, it released its first interim report on the underlying justification for Operation Warp Speed, which determined that lockdowns did more harm than good, that masks were ineffective at stopping COVID transmission, that COVID was “statistically almost harmless” to children and most adults, and that it is “highly likely” that COVID hospitalization numbers were inflated. The grand jury’s report on the vaccines themselves is highly anticipated.


VIDEO: Trump Warns New COVID Variant Will Be Used To Rig 2024 Election


Uganda’s Top Court Upholds Nearly All of Anti-Sodomy Law, Infuriating Biden Administration

Uganda’s Top Court Upholds Nearly All of Anti-Sodomy Law, Infuriating Biden Administration

adminApr 8, 20243 min read

Uganda’s Top Court Upholds Nearly All of Anti-Sodomy Law, Infuriating Biden Administration

Uganda’s Constitutional Court overwhelmingly upheld the country’s criminal ban on homosexual activity, prompting outrage from the pro-LGBT, far-left Biden White House.

KAMPALA, Uganda (LifeSiteNews) — Uganda’s constitutional court has upheld virtually all of the provisions in the country’s anti-sodomy law.

“We decline to nullify the Anti-Homosexuality Act 2023 in its entirety, neither will we grant a permanent injunction against its enforcement,” lead judge Richard Buteera saidwhen proclaiming the judgment of the court.

The court, however, did criticize some sections of the law that, the court said, were “inconsistent with right to health, privacy and freedom of religion.”

According to Reuters, the court struck down the provision that criminalized providing premises for homosexual acts and the failure to report homosexual acts. The court argued that these parts of the law violate individual rights and will, therefore, have to be removed from the act while the rest of the provisions can stay in place.

Ugandan lawyer Gawaya Tegulle, who supported the anti-sodomy law, said, “If this was an exam, we would have passed by about 95 percent.”

Biden White House spokesperson Karine Jean-Pierre, a far-left lesbian, condemned the court’s decision, calling it “a small and insufficient step towards safeguarding human rights.”

“The United States is deeply concerned about the remaining provisions,” Jean-Pierre, who is the first openly homosexual White House press secretary, said in a news briefing, claiming that the law jeopardizes “public health” and “Uganda’s international reputation.”

However, homosexuality results in serious health harms, including a nearly 30-times higher risk of HIV and elevated risks of other STDs and cancers, such as anal cancer. Moreover, as a disordered sexual practice, homosexuality cannot be considered a “human right,” as the Catholic Church teaches

As LifeSiteNews previously reported, Ugandan lawmakers have expressed growing concerns over the recruitment of children into the LGBT lifestyle. Groups like Sexual Minorities Uganda, founded in 2004 but banned in 2022, have reportedly targeted minors with cash payments to participate in homosexual, X-rated films. Propaganda designed to groom youth into supporting (and even engaging in) homosexuality had also been discovered in schools and elsewhere.  


VIDEO: Trump Warns New COVID Variant Will Be Used To Rig 2024 Election


Brent and Neil Go To Manchester

Brent and Neil Go To Manchester

adminApr 8, 20244 min read

Brent and Neil Go To Manchester

Brent Lee and Neil Sanders have published their 8 part podcast series discussing the so-called “conspiracy theories” that they claim have sprung up in regard to to the alleged 2017 Manchester Arena bombing. In particular they say that they are “examining the claims made by Richard D. Hall” made in his book and associated film which are both titled Manchester: The Night of the Bang.

You can download Richard’s book For Free Here.

If you would like to support Richard’s work you can also buy his Book HERE and HERE.

Richard D. Hall has presented a considerable body of evidence to substantiate his claims. It will be very interesting to listen to Brent and Neil’s exploration of the evidence. Presumably that is their intention.

Brent and Neil have offered the full series to their Patreon paid subscribers and will be releasing the full podcast series to non-Patreon subscribers in weekly instalments.

 

 

You can listen to and download the full series here for free:

Episode 1

 

Episode 2

 

Episode 3

 

Episode 4

 

Episode 5

 

Episode 6

 

Episode 7

 

Episode 8

This is how Brent and Neil have presented their 8 part podcast series:

Welcome to our Manchester Arena Bombing On Trial series. [. . .] On the 22nd of May, 2017, Salman Abedi detonated a bomb in the foyer of the Manchester Arena at the end of an Arianna Grande concert killing 22 people and injuring hundreds more.

A conspiracy theory claiming that this bombing was hoaxed and everyone involved was a crisis actor soon became a dominant narrative in the Conspirasphere. One of the main proponents of this theory is Richard D Hall. Over the course of this series we will be examining the claims made by Richard D Hall as told in his book and documentary “Night Of The Bang”

Please be aware, this series will be examining a deadly bombing and we will be discussing details of death and injury. Listener discretion is advised.

I would add to this reasonable warning that Brent and Neil use foul language quite readily. I am not offended by this but some listeners may be. Further discretion is advised.

While the evidence presented by Richard D. Hall does indeed suggests that the Manchester Arena bombing was a “hoaxed” false flag attack, the inference that Richard D. Hall alleges that “everyone involved was a crisis actor” is false. While this does not bode well for a supposedly factual exploration of the evidence surrounding the Manchester Arena bombing, as I haven’t listened to the whole series—at the time of posting—I will give Brent and Neil the benefit of the doubt and, like you I hope, will reserve judgement before I comment further.

I have shared some links below to give you some background on the investigative journalism conducted by Richard D. Hall.

Should Brent and Neil’s exploration of the evidence presented by Richard D. Hall warrant a response, I will make one. In the meantime, please fell free to download, share and comment on the podcasts as you see fit.

Please also share this post widely so that others can do the same.

Many thanks.

Richard D. Hall: – Manchester The Night of the Bang – Download the Book for Free

Richard D. Hall: Manchester The Night of the Bang

Richard D. Hall: Court Case Update

Richard D Hall: Legal Fund Raiser

Iain Davis: Richard D. Hall – A Travesty of Justice

Johnny Vedmore & Iain Davis Discuss The Richard D. Hall Case

Iain Davis: The Manchester Arena False Flag

Iain Davis: Disaster Troll Propaganda

Iain Davis: Investigation of Brent Lee – Part 1

Iain Davis: Investigation of Brent Lee  – Part 2

 

The post Brent and Neil Go To Manchester appeared first on Iain Davis.

US Is Being ‘Invaded’ Because Of Biden’s Political Games Says Texas Governor

US Is Being ‘Invaded’ Because Of Biden’s Political Games Says Texas Governor

adminApr 8, 20241 min read

US Is Being ‘Invaded’ Because Of Biden’s Political Games Says Texas Governor

Texas Governor Greg Abbott has taken aim at President Biden over the migrant crisis at the southern border. Abbott told “Fox News Sunday” that President Joe Biden’s “political games” are causing the invasion of the […]

The post US Is Being ‘Invaded’ Because Of Biden’s Political Games Says Texas Governor appeared first on The People’s Voice.

RFK Jr. Says he Would Codify Nationwide ‘Right’ To Abortion If Elected President

RFK Jr. Says he Would Codify Nationwide ‘Right’ To Abortion If Elected President

adminApr 8, 20246 min read

RFK Jr. Says he Would Codify Nationwide ‘Right’ To Abortion If Elected President

‘I would sign a federal law that guaranteed women have a right to choose. I think women should make the choice. I don’t think government should make the choice,’ Robert F. Kennedy said.

(LifeSiteNews) –– Democrat environmental activist turned independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. confirmed Thursday he would sign a federal law codifying a nationwide “right” to abortion, reminding pro-lifers considering him how much he still has in common with his former party.

Kennedy, nephew of the late President John F. Kennedy and son of the late Attorney General Robert Kennedy, announced last April he would be running in the Democrat primary against incumbent President Joe Biden, presenting himself as a challenger to the orthodoxies of both parties. But after months of contending that party leadership had “rigged” the primary process against him, Kennedy announced in October he was switching to an independent bid.

On Thursday, Kennedy appeared on the KSRM radio show “The Talk of the Kenai” for a wide-ranging discussion with host Bob Bird. During the interview (34:30 to 37:40 of “Talk’s” “Thursday Hour 1” audio segment at this link), Bird asked whether he would “veto or sign a restoration of Roe versus Wade as federal statutory law.” 

Before answering, the candidate launched into a lengthy monologue about how he opposed prohibiting abortion, but wanted to reduce pregnancy-related expenses to reduce incidence of abortion

“Here’s what my position is, Bob, and I know that I’m different than you on this. I come from a family that was, went from pro-life to pro-choice,” he said. “And so I grew up with family members who I love, who I talk to, who I respect, who didn’t feel that the way about it is—I went back and forth throughout my life. I’ve been for the past fifteen years, I’ve been the premiere advocate in the country for medical freedom and for bodily autonomy. So I don’t believe that government or any government bureaucrat ought to be able to tell people what to do with their bodies.

“”Now, at the same time, I think that every abortion is a tragedy. And I think that we as a nation should not have policies that compel women into a single choice which is what we have now, which is abortion,” Kennedy continued. “If they have a child, I want to make sure that women, particularly women—no woman in America makes a choice to terminate a pregnancy because she does not have the money to raise that child. And we put all of this money, you know, 85 percent of abortions in our country are among black women. Fertility clinics are in the white neighborhoods, the abortion clinics are in the black neighborhoods. And I’ve been greatly influenced by a woman called Angela Stanton-King, she’s part of Martin Luther King’s extended family, and she’s worked on this issue for many years. She has a house called Angie’s House, which takes care of young mothers who are being directed to abortion because they could not afford their babies, and they provide services so these young mothers can bring those babies to term.”

Bird interjected to repeat the original question, to which Kennedy answered, “I would sign a federal law that guaranteed women have a right to choose. I think women should make the choice. I don’t think government should make the choice.”

While some ambiguity remains on the details–i.e., whether he would distinguish between a bill allowing states to still pass some pro-life measures or something like the so-called Women’s Health Protection Act, which would go far beyond Roe and make it illegal for states to pass virtually any pro-life laws–the answer puts Kennedy in alignment with Biden’s calls to federally codify Roe, and the Democrat Party’s “safe, legal, and rare” formulation of the 1990s and early 2000s.

Kennedy suggested in August he would limit legal abortion to the first three months of pregnancy while speaking to a NBC News reporter at the Iowa State Fair, but hours later issued a statement claiming he misheard the question and actually believes abortion is “always the woman’s right to choose. He does not support legislation banning abortion.” He had made multiple pro-abortion decorations before that, as well.

The interview comes just days after Kennedy named left-wing donor Nicole Shanahan as his running mate, which sparked vocal disappointment from many who had previously expressed varying degrees of sympathy and support for him, and had been expecting a running mate less aligned with conventional Democrat politics. Others reacted by arguing the choice should not have been surprising given the various left-wing positions Kennedy retains, despite having won praise from the Right over his opposition to COVID-19 vaccines and mandates.

Biden is running on his absolutist pro-abortion record. The presumptive Republican nominee, former President Donald Trump, is running on the pro-life record of his administration while also suggesting he is interested in finding a new national compromise on the issue.

Polls currently have Trump leading Biden, although voters also say that convictions in Trump’s various ongoing legal battles would make them less likely to support him. However, serious concern among Democrats over Biden’s age and mental health, and deep dissatisfaction with his job performance, give the current president comparable electoral challenges.

How Kennedy’s run will impact the race has long been a subject of speculation, given he appeals both to Democrats who want a more mentally capable and seemingly less extreme liberal, and Republicans who prefer his COVID stance to Trump’s record on the subject.

At the moment, the aforementioned polls have Kennedy drawing roughly the same number of votes from the two major candidates, leaving Trump with a narrow lead. But given how close many are predicting the election to be, concern persists over how even small defections could impact the outcome.


VIDEO: Trump Warns New COVID Variant Will Be Used To Rig 2024 Election