Pfizer’s Chief Scientist Mikael Dolsten Is Stepping Down
Pfizer have announced that their Chief Scientific Officer, a key figure behind the development of its COVID-19 jab, is stepping down after more than 15-years with the big pharma giant. Mikael Dolsten served as the […]
The post Pfizer’s Chief Scientist Mikael Dolsten Is Stepping Down appeared first on The People’s Voice.
Trump Announces Plans for Technology Sector if Elected – NO CENSORSHIP & YES to FREE SPEECH in AI
Former President Donald Trump has announced several plans for the technology sector if he is elected a second time, with the Republican National Committee (RNC) adopting them.
First in these plans is the promotion of free speech in the development of artificial intelligence (AI). According to Reclaim the Net, the Biden administration’s Executive Order (EO) on AI signed in October of last year runs contrary to Trump’s agenda in the matter.
“The administration will work with allies and partners abroad on a strong international framework to govern the development and use of AI,” the White House said in a statement at the time. “The actions that President [Joe] Biden directed today are vital steps forward in the U.S.’s approach on safe, secure and trustworthy AI.”
According to Republicans, the EO on AI is dangerous as it puts roadblocks in the path of AI innovation. It also imposes “radical left-wing ideas on the development of this technology.” Thus, the GOP has pledged to back AI development based on free speech and the flourishing of humanity.
Aside from AI, the GOP has also zeroed in on the weaponization of the federal government under the Biden administration. In particular, the party has taken issue with the White House striving to impose ideology and joining forces with private technology firms to stifle lawful speech. This censorship, according to Reclaim The Net, is used “as a political weapon against opponents.”
“We will declassify government records, root out wrongdoers and fire corrupt employees. We will ban the federal government from colluding with anyone to censor lawful speech, defund institutions engaged in censorship and hold accountable all bureaucrats involved with illegal censoring. We will protect free speech online,” the GOP platform stated.
Trump also plans to ban CBDCs
Aside from promoting free speech in AI development and opposing the weaponization of government through censorship, Trump’s platform adopted by the RNC also rejects central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) such as the digital dollar.
(Related: Trump tells supporters he will “never allow” a CBDC if re-elected.)
According to Reclaim The Net, opponents of CBDCs cite the digital dollar’s potential to be used as another tool to further limit and weaken people’s financial independence and privacy. At the same time, CBDCs serve as building blocks to form the foundations of an Orwellian mass surveillance endeavor.
But the GOP frames the issue from an economic perspective. The party under Trump is reportedly dedicated to finding future economic progress for their country by becoming a leader in what the document calls emerging industries.
Under this roadmap, a CBDC does not qualify – but decentralized cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin are. The RNC vows to at once end Democrats’ “unlawful and un-American crypto crackdown” and oppose a CBDC for the U.S. if Trump wins in November.
The platform also reiterates its defense of Bitcoin, including defending the right to mine it – an energy-intensive endeavor. The GOP will also defend “the right to self-custody of their digital assets, and transact free from government surveillance and control.” The latter is ostensibly a response to the issue of government meddling in people’s economic sovereignty.
Reclaim The Net ultimately remarked that the policy pledges by Trump and the RNC concerning technology can be described as “a return to common sense.”
Head over to Trump.news for more stories about the former president.
BOMBSHELL: Secret Service Told To Stand Down In Butler, Pennsylvania, Says Trump Event Head
Trudeau’s Government is Sinking Millions into Pro-LGBTQIAAP2S+ Groups as You Get Poorer
(LifeSiteNews) — As federal Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre frequently observes, everything in Canada seems broken. A tiny minority of young people can afford to purchase homes in the places where they grew up; home ownership in Canada’s largest cities is inaccessible to all but the wealthy. An increasing number of Canadians are using foodbanks, and in the second quarter of 2023, 26.8% of Canadians reportedthat they were struggling to make ends meet each month. The Trudeau years, a toxic fusion of runaway fiscal incompetence and woke progressive activism, have not been kind to ordinary Canadians.
That is relevant context when considering the fact that the Trudeau government has spent hundreds of millions of dollars to promote LGBT ideology over the past several years. As Pat Maloney, the investigative blogger who runs “Run With Life,” has reported, Canada spent a staggering $108,594,964 in 2022 on LGBT ideology in 2022. The LGBT movement is an activist movement pushing a contested ideology that millions of Canadians profoundly disagree with—despite that, the Canadian government takes money from hard-working men and women and turns it over to the LGBT movement each year.
To put a fine point on it: Your wages are garnished each month to fund organizations staging an ideological takeover of Canadian institutions—including public and Catholic schools. In other words, the parents protesting LGBT ideology in schools last year were actually paying for many of the very changes they were protesting—and funding the organizations spearheading those changes. Canada’s LGBT movement isn’t a grassroots movement. It’s a state funded operation.
In 2023, the Trudeau government once again forked over the earnings of Canadian taxpayers to LGBT organizations. This time, Maloney reports, the number was lower—but still, obviously, far too high: “In 2023 that number was $665,454,357. Definitely an improvement. But still $665,454,357 too much.” Maloney noted that not all of the grants had been announced yet, and that her reporting was ongoing. I’m sure we’ll soon discover more ways the Trudeau government has used our money to fuel the movement(s) championing our nation’s moral decline.
In addition to funding the LGBT movement, Trudeau is also all-in on funding abortion—not only in Canada, where he committed millions of dollars to train more abortionists and “improve abortion access”—but overseas, as well. The Trudeau government committed hundreds of millions of dollars to pushing both feticide and LGBT ideology in countries that overwhelmingly reject both, something Nigerian human rights activist and former Canadian ambassador to China David Mulroney referred to as “ideological neo-colonialism” in a powerful documentary on the subject. In fact, Trudeau even used the Covid pandemic as an excuse to push abortion overseas, funneling taxpayer money into “international efforts to fight the COVID-19 pandemic” that included…“sexual and reproductive health and rights.”
Trudeau’s tenure has made Canada a poorer nation in every way. We are financially poorer across the board; we are reputationally poorer around the world, despite our aggressive promotion of LGBT ideology and abortion; we are, above all, morally poorer, known internationally as promoters of the Sexual Revolution and failing to meet our obligations. Our prime minister is the sort of leader who expects homeless Canadians to admire him for funding the abortions of African babies in developing countries, and to celebrate a country with runaway inflation because we are one of the last remaining Western nations to defend sex changes for children.
The damage he will leave behind is greater than the most pessimistic of us thought possible back in 2015.
BOMBSHELL: Secret Service Told To Stand Down In Butler, Pennsylvania, Says Trump Event Head
Former NIH Chief of Staff Denies Suppressing Lab Leak Theory Amid Pandemic Censorship Allegations
Carrie Wolinetz, past Chief of Staff of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), asserted in no uncertain terms last Thursday that there was no suppression of the lab leak theory throughout the Covid-19 drama. This denial, made during the Senate Homeland Security hearing, came in response to queries from Senator Josh Hawley, a Missouri Republican, regarding her potential role in suppressing the theory – suggesting that the virus was inadvertently released from a lab in China – across internet platforms.
Hawley sought to ascertain if Wolinetz had any regrets about not resisting supposed censorship attempts orchestrated by her then-superior, NIH’s previous Director Francis Collins, or Dr. Anthony Fauci. Hawley asked Wolinetz directly, putting forth, “Do you regret your role in helping censor millions of Americans who were kicked off social media, who were disciplined at work for saying ‘maybe a lab was involved?’” Her response was firm, maintaining that she never played the role he suggested. When posed with the question of whether she regretted not standing against such censorship, Wolinetz adamantly reiterated, “I don’t believe censorship took place, sir.”
In light of her insistence that no such suppression efforts had been carried out, Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky responded by revealing Wolinetz would not be considered for a role in a proposed board – introduced by himself and aimed at overseeing federal funding for high-priority life sciences research and assuring agency accountability – under the Executive Branch.
Despite Wolinetz’s denial, evidence and instances that hint at a strict censorship regime have surfaced. One significant account of such censorship involves Facebook labeling and suppressing stories relating to the controversial lab leak theory a “false.” The Biden Administration even called for curbing “misinformation,” an action that included requests to Facebook to limit private conversations on WhatsApp, as revealed by emails from 2023 under the lawsuit: Missouri v. Biden, (later Murthy v. Missouri) revolving around freedom of speech.
The release of the Twitter Files further unveiled Twitter’s broadened practice of handling content moderation requests from various federal and state agencies, the State Department, and the intelligence community during the pandemic. This collaboration between the government and social media magnates reportedly involved restricting the Hunter Biden laptop story, blacklisting prominent conservative figures, and subtly restricting conservative content. Records obtained by the House Republicans expose another probable suppression effort wherein Fauci’s advisor David Morens toned down the lab leak hypothesis at Fauci’s directive as per the instructions documented in the files.
BOMBSHELL: Secret Service Told To Stand Down In Butler, Pennsylvania, Says Trump Event Head
Think Tank Pushes International Alliance to Censor ‘Fake News’
The Japanese chair of the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) has come out with a report calling for the US and Japan to team up on “combating disinformation.”
Christopher B. Johnstone also wants the two countries to engage in several censorship techniques, such as removing content (“false narratives” – regular censorship) but also a considerably more dystopian one known as “prebunking.”
That would be, suppressing narratives by revealing them as “misinformation” before they become public, thus eroding the very perception of their trustworthiness, while equating this as introducing “mental antibodies” into a population, and other outlandish language has been used in the past to justify the tactic.
CSIS mentions in a press release announcing the report that Johnstone had a meeting with Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs Director of Public Diplomacy Strategy Division Hideaki Ishii, “to discuss how the United States and Japan can cooperate to address this critical challenge” (namely, combating “disinformation”).
Not for nothing – CSIS is not your run-of-the-mill nonprofit, and access to government structures in other countries is not surprising, given its origins and image as one of those think tanks that have an oversized influence on US foreign policy.
Now, CSIS wants Japan and the US to tackle “information operations” such as (real or labeled as such) disinformation threats. The report seeks to establish an agenda to increase this collaboration and mentions that the paper includes “the results of a closed-door conference held at CSIS in February” – attended by “experts” from both countries.
The part of the report that addresses strategies to counter the threat, defined by CSIS, includes public education and media literacy, AI (as a tool of censorship – but without failing to mention the same tech as supposedly a grave threat to democracies when it’s used to create deepfakes).
Another thing CSIS likes is “fact-checking” (while critical of Japan as being “somewhat late” to this particular game), as well as debunking.
And then, there’s “prebunking” which CSIS chooses to describe as a method that proactively issues “forewarnings” and also “preemptively refutes false narratives.”
Coming back to Earth a little bit, so to speak – in terms of championing more conventional information control tools, the CSIS strategy lastly mentions “labeling, transparency, and risk monitoring.”
BOMBSHELL: Secret Service Told To Stand Down In Butler, Pennsylvania, Says Trump Event Head
NANNY VEHICLES: New Cars in Europe to Automatically Reduce Engine Power if Driver is Speeding
The surveillance state is expanding in Europe after new rules came into effect on July 7, 2024, that force automobile manufacturers to control how fast people are allowed to drive their own new cars.
From now on, all new cars sold in Europe must be outfitted with Intelligent Speed Assistance (ISA) systems that automatically limit vehicle speeds to match legal limits. A massive network of GPS and cameras will ensure compliance.
“The system alerts drivers to slow down and can reduce engine power if limits are exceeded,” reported Great Game India about the change, noting that it was hatched by European Union (EU) leaders, many of whom are unelected.
The official claim from government officials is that ISA systems will reduce accidents and fatalities. Opponents say this is not the case as they further warn that ISA systems will interfere with driver control and vehicle reliability, which will only cause more problems for European society.
For now, the United Kingdom is exempt from the rule, though there is chatter that UK officials will follow suit with their own version of the same law in the coming days.
(Related: Ever since Wuhan coronavirus [COVID-19] “vaccines” were unleashed through Operation Warp Speed, “vaccidents” on roadways have soared.)
Total authoritarian control
A combination of GPS data, satellite navigation, speed sign recognition cameras and forward-facing cameras will now be used to determine how fast a car should go in a given area. If a driver tries to exceed the posted speed, the ISA system on his car will kick in and slow the car.
Drivers on the M1, for instance, would be limited to a maximum speed of 70 mph. Should a driver push the gas pedal beyond that speed, ISA technology automatically reduces engine power until compliance with the posted speed limit is achieved.
As most drivers probably know, there are times when one might need to exceed the posted speed limit for safety reasons, i.e., to swerve around an out-of-control vehicle in order to avoid a major accident. ISA systems will prevent drivers from protecting themselves by limiting their speed regardless of driving conditions.
All of this is happening thanks to a 2019 ruling by the European Parliament to mandate ISA technology as a way to make society “safer.” The European Transport Safety Council claims that ISA technology may reduce car crashes by 30 percent and injuries by 20 percent with the eventual goal of eliminating all road deaths by 2050.
Starting on July 6, 2022, all new vehicle models released to the market for the first time had to include ISA technology. Now, as of July 7, 2024, all new vehicles period will need to comply with the ISA technology mandate.
“This means that manufacturers will have to install the technology on some older cars, such as the Volkswagen Touran, which has been on sale in its current iteration since 2015,” Great Game India explains.
The UK’s Department of Transport (DfT) has said that for now it will not be enforcing any kind of speed-limiting technology across its jurisdiction. That could eventually change, though.
“We are constantly carrying out research into how transport users across all modes can benefit from the latest technology, ensuring journeys are safe, reliable and cut emissions,” said a representative from DfT.
Even without an ISA technology mandate in place, it is likely that vehicle manufacturers will voluntarily install it in UK models. Volvo started installing speed limiters on all new cars sold in the UK in early 2020, for instance, when everyone was distracted by and panicking about the COVID “plandemic.”
Authoritarian control over others is the only thing the globalists know. Learn more at Globalism.news.
BOMBSHELL: Secret Service Told To Stand Down In Butler, Pennsylvania, Says Trump Event Head