Border Patrol Rescues Drowning Illegal in Rio Grande
U.S. Border Patrol (USBP) agents pulled a woman from the Rio Grande who nearly drowned while illegally crossing from Mexico this week, authorities say.
On Thursday, USBP Laredo Sector posted about a statement about the rescue along with photographs on social media.
“The Laredo Sector Marine Unit observed a group of non-citizens crossing the Rio Grande,” USBP wrote on X.
“A woman in the group began to drown, and the crew quickly pulled her out of the water. The female subject was unresponsive, but after quick medical aid by the crew she regained consciousness.”
USBP agents in Laredo Sector have executed a number of rescues and apprehensions in recent days.
Last week, a group of illegals were swarmed and stung by bees after they bailed out of a vehicle during an apparent pursuit.
On Tuesday, Laredo agents and local police pulled 17 illegals out of a locked trailer in the city of Encinal.
Chaos unfolds constantly along the U.S.-Mexico border, as Infowars regularly reports.
Top Sniper Responds to Claims Trump Was Not Shot in Pennsylvania
BREAKING INTERNET FIRESTORM: How Many Joe Bidens Are There?!
Questions are swirling over whether the public is seeing the real Joe Biden or body doubles after he was seen in public several inches higher than his known height. Alex Jones breaks down the fascinating developments here and attempts to answer the question, how many Joe Biden’s are there?
BREAKING INTERNET FIRESTORM: How Many Joe Bidens Are There?! pic.twitter.com/HyoMBIFNbV
— Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) July 26, 2024
Olympics & NBC Issue Copyright Strikes to Halt Criticism of Bizarre Drag Queen Opening Ceremony Mocking Christianity
The Olympics and its parent network NBC are taking down videos of its controversial opening ceremony featuring drag queens mocking Christianity, citing copyright infringement.
Many social media users on Saturday have reported their X accounts have been frozen as a result of these takedown notices issued by ATHLETIA on behalf of The International Olympic Committee.
Dear @elonmusk
— MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) July 27, 2024
I woke up this morning to learn that myself and many other accounts were locked out of their accounts for sharing clips of the Olympics. I’m sure some were suspended over this.
Someone named Jonathan Schmitz, a representative of ATHLETIA, on behalf of The… pic.twitter.com/47fk5Lk978
All morning I have seen popular accounts complain they were DCMA’d for posting the Last Supper part of the Olympics opening. They had to delete it in order to maintain their account.
— The Gal (@giveu2tictacs) July 27, 2024
Oddly, DCMA is a US law and the footage is the Olympics in France. It would only mean that the…
Tons of people have been locked for a DCMA strike. Don’t criticize the Olympics. ☠️ pic.twitter.com/cwZTOzZY8z
— ????? ?. ?? (@RandomHeroWX) July 27, 2024
?WARNING?: ATHLETIA SPORTS on behalf of The International Olympic Committee is actively filing DCMA take down requests with X. I retweeted a series of videos in which I criticized the opening ceremony. I created one custom edit comparing the last supper and the opening scene. X… pic.twitter.com/lzZt7e3cM9
— @amuse (@amuse) July 27, 2024
But under the Copyright Act, copyrighted works fall under fair use when commentary and critique are applied, which raises concerns about the legitimacy of these takedowns.
?OLYMPICS AND NBC USING COPYRIGHT TO SILENCE CRITICISM
The Olympics and NBC are taking down videos of the controversial Olympics opening ceremony, citing copyright infringement, instead of addressing the criticism.
This action has sparked outrage, as many believe these… pic.twitter.com/FNyoMcVMUK— Mario Nawfal (@MarioNawfal) July 27, 2024
Even X owner Elon Musk weighed in on the anti-Christian display.
“This was extremely disrespectful to Christians,” he wrote Friday.
This was extremely disrespectful to Christians
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 26, 2024
The internet was buzzing with criticism of the 2024 Olympics opening ceremony in Paris, France, which featured a cadre of transvestites and a fat woman posing in the fashion of the Last Supper, the Leonardo da Vinci painting immortalizing Jesus Christ’s last meal with his disciples before his crucifixion.
Countries should pull their ambassadors out of France over this. I’m 100% serious. pic.twitter.com/Mpe10kTn6N
— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) July 26, 2024
And the trans insanity didn’t let up after that.
Actual opening ceremony of the Olympics.
— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) July 26, 2024
This isn’t parody.
RIP Olympics. pic.twitter.com/5gk1yObldB
What the hell is going on at the Olympics? pic.twitter.com/VY3pNyP9wX
— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) July 26, 2024
We are absolutely disgusted to see these drag queens and half-naked gender cultists dance around little kids at the Olympics for the entire world to watch.
— Gays Against Groomers (@againstgrmrs) July 26, 2024
This agenda isn’t just an American issue. It’s global. And if this doesn’t horrify you, then you aren’t paying attention. pic.twitter.com/N6aHjmHzAi
The event also featured creepy occult imagery, including the Pale Horse of Death foretold in the Book of Revelation, the Golden Calf, and a metal performance showcasing a decapitated Marie Antoinette.
If you have any doubt what is going on at the Olympics opening ceremony
— Vision4theBlind (@Vision4theBlind) July 26, 2024
A single rider on a pale horse is straight out of the book of Revelation
“And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him. And power was given unto… pic.twitter.com/r4sIcAIwAG
Not an accident that a bull was displayed on stage at the opening ceremony.
— Vision4theBlind (@Vision4theBlind) July 26, 2024
Baal worship pic.twitter.com/BgKGzcrmMd
The opening ceremony of the Olympics is not even hiding the satanic rituals anymore.
— Shadow of Ezra (@ShadowofEzra) July 26, 2024
There is no longer anything hidden in plain sight.
These are the demonic dark forces of Satan who want to eclipse the light.
You can already see:
– Skulls
– Motifs of death
– Satanic red… pic.twitter.com/0C0zsfWd1X
Many expressed their disgust and disapproval of the Olympics’ mockery of Christianity and woke trans and occult messaging being force-fed to the world.
— Not Jerome Powell (@alifarhat79) July 26, 2024
Catholic bishop slams Olympics Opening Ceremony for mocking Christianity.
— Oli London (@OliLondonTV) July 27, 2024
“Would they ever have dared mock Islam in a similar way?”
? @breeadail
pic.twitter.com/2ZX3jq2ida
The Olympics opening ceremony is not being received well.
— Wall Street Silver (@WallStreetSilv) July 27, 2024
? pic.twitter.com/ABQfNPIAAc
As a sincerely patriotic French girl, I disolidarise myself from this freakshow and apologize to you, world.#Paris2024 pic.twitter.com/KXr55NdACW
— Juliette Briens (@JulietteBriens) July 26, 2024
It’s drag queen story time brought to you by BlackRock worldwide. It’s all a test to see if a synthetic corporate monoculture can be forced on the planet. No matter where you are the ESG demands submission to the death cult. https://t.co/l8noqUriSp
— Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) July 27, 2024
The top picture is from the Rothschild mansion ball
— JuliansRum (@ItsJuliansRum) July 26, 2024
The below picture is from today pic.twitter.com/9VVA7yZW0l
When I went on Tucker, I explained how the left uses mockery of Christianity to hold mock cult rituals and has been doing so since the French Revolution
— Jack Poso ?? (@JackPosobiec) July 26, 2024
Here’s France today: https://t.co/g352MQ4OdP
Fuck the Olympics boycott it for the disrespect of Jesus Christ
— RYAN GARCIA (@RyanGarcia) July 26, 2024
NEW – French bishops deplore “scenes of mockery of Christianity” during the Olympics opening ceremony. pic.twitter.com/DVwAfnGzJP
— Disclose.tv (@disclosetv) July 27, 2024
The criticism was so overwhelming that the Olympics even deleted their own YouTube video of the highlights of its opening ceremony.
The Olympics deleted their own video of the opening ceremony because it was being criticized too much. pic.twitter.com/hxDs7kO63t
— Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) July 27, 2024
But rather than addressing the valid criticism, the Olympics and NBC are resorting to taking down videos of the controversial opening ceremony under the guise of copyright infringement.
There’s Something in the Water
It’s a story as old as modern industry itself. An industrial process creates huge amounts of largely worthless byproduct, so what do the manufacturers do? They find a way to add value to it and create a new product, marketing it as “essential” or “healthy” or both. A period of years or decades pass, and the product is firmly established as precisely that—“essential,” “healthy” or both. But in truth, it’s the opposite.
Of course, it’s not surprising that companies do this—the aim of companies in the capitalist system is to maximise profit, after all—but that doesn’t change the fact that, again and again, the enterprising nature of business has helped to create a public-health disaster.
This is exactly what happened around the turn of the 20th century with the worthless oil byproducts of the cotton industry. Producers had enormous quantities of cottonseed oil and nothing to do with it apart from sell it as an industrial lubricant or paint thinner. Using new hydrogenation technology, the cottonseed producers created margarine, a spreadable fat, which they marketed to the public as a “healthy” alternative to the animal fats humans have eaten since the beginning of time. Eventually, with the help of big money and gerrymandered science—the so-called “lipid-heart hypothesis”—these novel fats and oils displaced butter and lard and tallow, and seventy years later everyone is unhealthier and unhappier than it would ever have been possible to imagine. Instead of the renewed health we were promised, we were made subject to a terrible new kind of physical bondage, under the domination of big food, big pharma and big government.
The same is true of the products that are used to fluoridate water, especially fluorosilicic acid in its various different forms. It wasn’t until the middle of the twentieth century that public fluoridation campaigns, with the backing of producers of fluorosilicic acid, began, but today in the US about 75% of people receive a fluoridated water supply through their taps. The main justification for this is the prevention of dental caries.
For decades, campaigners against fluoridation have been portrayed by governments, scientists and the media as cranks—the more so, in fact, as evidence of the harmful effects of fluoride exposure has stacked up. Animal studies show, unequivocally, that high levels of fluoride exposure can cause serious neurobiological changes, especially in the offspring of pregnant animals that are exposed, because fluoride can pass the placental barrier from mother to child.
But it’s not just animals. In recent years, credible studies from Canada and Mexico have linked fluoridation to lowered IQs and cognitive impairment in children. And now a new study, from the US, shows that the standard concentration of fluoride in tap water across the US may be enough to double the risk of a child displaying neurobehavioural issues—including diagnosable conditions like ADHD—at the age of three, if it was exposed during gestation.
The indisputable truth is this: when fluoridation was introduced, we simply didn’t know what effects it would have, not really, in the same we didn’t understand the full effects of substituting novel vegetable and seed oils for the animal fats man evolved eating and to eat.
Instead we found out. But part of the problem with f***ing around and finding out is that things become complicated. Much more complicated. All of a sudden, decades later, you have enormous vested interests—commercial, scientific, governmental—whose sole purpose is to protect their profits and reputations and prevent any kind of change to the new status quo. Causality becomes diffuse, and now you’re not just talking about polyunsaturated fatty acids but other lifestyle factors like smoking, lack of exercise, exposure to harmful chemicals, stress and a thousand other things. Untangling those threads becomes very hard indeed. How convenient.
The alternative, of course, is to reject the attitude of “safe until proven otherwise.” That’s the attitude, driven by the laws of commerce and the desire to maximise profit, that allows minimal testing of new products and partisan, corporate science to be put forward, often in secrecy, behind closed doors, in support of a new product’s safety. The FDA’s system for licensing new foods and drugs has been described as “the foxes guarding the henhouse.” It’s hard to disagree.
As I’ve said elsewhere, I believe the attitude towards innovations needs to be a conservative one: harmful until proven otherwise. The evidence—not least of all the potentially species-ending reproductive effects caused by exposure to thousands of different plastic chemicals, herbicides and insecticides, fire retardants, and so on—fully justifies me in saying this.
Dazzled by the miraculous properties of plastics, we’ve created a world where in less than two decades’ time, the median man will have a sperm count of zero: one half of all men will produce no sperm, and the other half will produce so few they might as well produce none. What then? Extinction? Does man simply go gentle into that good night?
We keep making the same mistakes. Instead of adding fluoride to the water, we could have encouraged better diet. The pioneering dentist Weston A. Price showed, in the 1930s , how traditional societies that continued to eat their diets of primarily nutrient-dense animal foods barely suffered tooth decay at all, even if they didn’t brush their teeth. What mattered was the massive quantities of protein, fat and most of all fat-soluble vitamins, minerals and co-factors they consumed on a daily basis. That’s what protected their health and their dentition, not a contaminated water supply.
But getting people to eat more butter and cheese and organ meat wasn’t in line with the emerging scientific-corporate agenda that has captured our food supply and much more besides—so we got fluoridation instead.
It’s time, I think, to admit that fluoridation needs to be rethought. At the very least, urgent, honest, unpoliticised research must take place and be presented to the public, who should be allowed to decide—on the basis of the facts, without any reference to profits—whether they want their water to have fluoride in it.
Of course, this won’t happen, because it would call into question so much more than what is or isn’t in the water today.
MUST-WATCH VIDEO: Ben Carson Exposes The Plan For One World Government With Tucker Carlson
Former HUD Secretary Dr. Ben Carson and Tucker Carlson discuss the New World Order agenda that’s gone mainstream and how the key to its defeat it a well-informed and involved citizenry.
MUST-WATCH VIDEO: Ben Carson Exposes The Plan For One World Government With Tucker Carlson pic.twitter.com/rpXgttLqyv
— Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) July 26, 2024
Cattle Farming: Food for Thought
Today I was a guest on InfoWars’ American Journal to speak with adamantine news director/guest-host Rob Dew (who temporarily took the reigns from the ever-insightful Harrison Smith). The topic at hand was a dangerous scam: ‘edible’ insects (see my article Sick from ze Bugs?).
I had intended to discuss how cattle farming is actually—as the kids say these days—a low-pesticide-use, low-input type of farming, even though globalists such as Bill Gates are now trying to portray cattle as being bad for the environment, in their effort to push their ‘environmentally friendly’ insect products. Rob made a great point in this regard at the beginning of our segment, and then I still managed to forget to back up his idea. The gist of what he said is that cows are able to efficiently convert grass into protein, with little inputs needed. (Here is a link to the segment.)
Nomadic tribes have traditionally raised cattle, allowing the animals to eat various wild plants, and continuously driving them onward to new territory. These plants are frequently species that are not edible for humans. Similarly, on private property, cattle are rotated between different fields to allow them to graze on grass and weedy herbs. I’m no expert on cattle farming, but let’s compare it to vegetable farming: I know that raising cattle doesn’t require as much material input. For example, irrigation is not typically utilized in cattle farming, but is always used for cultivating vegetables.
Even organic vegetable farming occasionally requires fungicides, such as neem oil, copper-based sprays, etc. Naturally derived pesticides are allowed per the USDA Organic program labeling law. Third-party certifiers, such as the Organic Materials Review Institute (OMRI), approve pesticides, fertilizers, cleaning agents (bleach is allowed for cleaning microbial buildup in irrigation lines, for example), and other ‘materials,’ for use in organic farming. These are not necessarily safe for people and the environment, albeit they are generally less harmful than materials used in conventional production—but per academic indoctrination at University of Florida, I’m not supposed to say this! If I tell you that conventional production is less safe than organic production for humans and the environment, that implies that the regulations for conventional production are insufficient to protect consumers and the environment. Don’t say that! That’s blaspheming the state!
Insecticides, such as insecticidal soaps, neem oil (from the neem tree; it’s a fungicide/insecticide/miticide), pyrethrins (nerve toxin extracted from chrysanthemum), Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) bacterial toxins (activated by the alkaline digestive tracts of insects), and so on and so on, are also relied upon in organic vegetable production.
Even if we look at agronomic grain crops such as wheat, oats, field corn, etc., which are grown on vast acreage compared to vegetables and other horticultural crops, and require less inputs, the plants are nonetheless domesticated varieties that cannot grow and yield well without human intervention.
When you go to the grocery store, think about the standards that consumers expect in their produce. They will turn up their noses at the slightest imperfections. Presenting produce to buyers in such pristine condition takes a lot of effort and typically requires significant fertilization, irrigation, and, often, pesticide applications.
Contrast this with the demands of the lowly, lowing cow. She’ll eat wild-type grass happily, and it need not be unblemished. The microbial biome in her stomach will breakdown the grass’ cellulose (a.k.a. fiber), and release nutrients that humans could not obtain from grass. The cow in-turn becomes a source of healthy meat. This is essentially the point Rob made.
Interestingly, Herodotus, in his Histories (published circa 425 BC; it took him 35 years to write), discusses Ethiopians living to be on average 80 years old, and often as old as 120! They achieved this amazing longevity on a diet almost exclusively comprised of boiled meat, cattle blood, and milk. Meanwhile, for Persians and Greeks, who depended on bread, living to be 80 years old was a rarity.
In the context of our discussion on insects, cattle farming is being demonized as harmful to the planet, but meanwhile, no one demonizes vegetable farming. Which one is really more harmful? I submit to you that neither presents obstacles that can’t be overcome without governmental intervention. In-fact, Big Government’s intervention will stymie the innovation that we need individual freedom to cultivate.
The message being pushed is that cattle farming is an existential threat, and that we must switch to eating disgusting bugs. This is nothing more than a thinly veiled money grab, using state policing to push out the old cattle industry and bring in the new insect industry. The people investing in the new insect industry are harnessing state power, under the guise of ‘the common good,’ to regulate out their competitors—supposedly to stop climate ‘change’—the nebulous, ambiguous boogeyman. Are people really going to buy into this frass?
God bless you. Thanks for reading, and please share the link to this article.