Kamala Harris Hired Illegal Alien Who Attacked a Woman to be Part of Jobs Program While Serving as San Francisco’s DA
While she was San Francisco’s district attorney, Vice President Kamala Harris hired an illegal immigrant who attacked a woman to be part of a free jobs program.
Harris has consistently claimed that she has spent her career fighting individuals and institutions who harm the American public and has been broadcasting this message since beginning her presidential bid. But her tenure as San Francisco District Attorney reveals otherwise.
During her time as a prosecutor, Harris implemented a program known as “Back on Track” to rehabilitate illegal immigrants arrested for drug crimes through education and job training. Harris supported this initiative as a model for criminal justice reform.
(Related: Media rewrites history, claims Kamala was never Biden’s “border czar” in charge of migrant problem.)
However, the program faced scrutiny when one of its participants, Alexander Izaguirre, an illegal immigrant from Honduras, committed a violent crime while enrolled.
Izaguirre, who had been arrested twice within eight months for purse snatching and selling cocaine, was selected for “Back on Track” by Harris’s office.
But in July 2008, while Izaguirre was enrolled in the program, he assaulted Amanda Kiefer, a San Francisco resident, in a brutal attack that left her with a fractured skull and long-term trauma. At that time, Izaguirre stole Kiefer’s purse and, in his attempt to escape, got into an SUV and tried to run her down. Kiefer clung to the hood of the vehicle before being thrown onto the road, resulting in severe injuries. The attack prompted Kiefer to leave California permanently. He avoided deportation and still received job training.
When his story surfaced in 2009 during Harris’ campaign to be California’s attorney general, she expressed regret about the program’s oversight regarding illegal immigrants and expressed her confusion and anger over why individuals with criminal records were not being deported.
“The immigration issue, as it relates to the Izaguirre case, obviously is a huge kind of pimple on the face of this program,” Harris said at the time. “I don’t mean to trivialize it, nor do I mean to cover it up.” She was left with no choice but to support the deportation of Izaguirre and revised the “Back on Track” criteria to require participants to provide documentation proving their eligibility to work legally. But Harris still allowed the remaining illegal immigrants in the program to complete their training.
“My issue was more, what are we going to do to prevent this from happening in the future?” she said at the time. And now, she is touting her time as a prosecutor in her 2024 presidential bid.
Harris also supports sanctuary policies linked to the release of violent criminals
Aside from the “Back on Track” program, she also supported sanctuary policies, which have been linked to the release of violent criminals, as a San Francisco District Attorney.
In fact, a 2006 statement from her spokesperson declared, “We are a sanctuary city, a city of refuge, and we always will be.” This policy, which protects undocumented immigrants, prohibited local authorities from questioning individuals’ immigration status unless they committed a crime.
However, the loose interpretation of several city departments about the policies has been implicated in multiple violent crimes.
For instance, the notorious case of Edwin Ramos, an illegal immigrant from El Salvador with a significant criminal history, committed a triple murder in June 2008. Ramos fatally shot Tony Bologna, 48, and his two sons Michael, 20 and Matthew, 16, at a traffic stop. Prosecutors suggested that Ramos mistakenly believed the victims were rival gang members.
Ramos was charged with gang-related assault and an attempted robbery, yet the juvenile probation department did not involve federal immigration authorities due to the sanctuary city policy.
At the time, Danielle Bologna, the widow and mother of the Bologna victims, pleaded with Harris to seek the death penalty for Ramos. But Harris clung to her anti-death penalty stance and instead advocated for a life sentence without parole for Ramos.
In March 2008, just months before the Bologna murders, Ramos was found in a car with another gang member who had tried to discard a gun used in a double killing. Charges were not filed against Ramos as police could not prove his knowledge of the gun.
In line with this, Danielle Bologna filed a lawsuit against the city in 2009. She argued that the lenient interpretation of sanctuary city policies contributed to the death of her family. However, a judge dismissed the lawsuit, ruling that city officials were not responsible for Ramos’ actions.
Follow KamalaHarris.news for more stories about the vice president.
Watch this Fox News report about about Trump campaign press secretary Karoline Leavitt calling Kamala Harris a dangerously liberal and radical leftist.
BREAKING: Fiber-optic Networks Sabotaged in France
Fiber-optic networks in France have been sabotaged in six areas of France, according to French police. The capital, Paris, is currently unaffected.
The sabotage occurred just three days after another deliberate attack on France’s high-speed rail system, timed to coincide with the opening of the Paris Olympic Games. Travel was disrupted for hundreds of thousands of people.
French Interior Minister Gerald Darmanin said the authorities believe “ultra-left” movements could be behind the attacks.
French security services have “identified a certain number of profiles that could have committed” the sabotage acts, he said. He added that the “attacks were intentional, very precise, extremely well targeted,” and that this was “the traditional mode of operation of the ultra-left.”
“The question is whether they were manipulated or is it for their own account,” he said.
French police have already arrested an activist belonging to a leftist group. The man was arrested at Oissel in northern France and had in his possession keys to a site belonging to rail operator SNCF.
All high-speed trains in France are now running again after railway engineers worked round the clock to restore service.
Erdogan Could End up Like Saddam – Israel
Israeli Foreign Minister Israel Katz has warned that Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan could end up like former Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein, who was toppled and executed by a US-backed coalition, if he attempts to intervene in the Gaza war.
Erdogan traded threats with Israeli officials on Sunday over the IDF’s ongoing military operation in Gaza, as well as rapidly escalating tensions with Lebanese-based armed group Hezbollah. Speaking at a rally in his hometown of Rize, Erdogan suggested that Türkiye could “enter” Israel in order to help the Palestinians.
“We must be very strong so that Israel can’t do these ridiculous things to Palestine,”Erdogan said. In the past he has condemned Israel’s actions in Gaza to those of Nazi Germany – and likened Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to Adolf Hitler.
READ MORE: NATO state threatens to invade Israel
Katz responded with a warning of his own on X (formerly Twitter). “Erdogan is going down the path of Saddam Hussein and threatens to attack Israel,” he wrote, adding that the Turkish leader “should just remember what happened there and how that ended.”
Israeli opposition leader Yair Lapid also blasted Erdogan, calling him a “danger to the Middle East” and a “wannabe dictator.”
Read more NATO states tell citizens to leave Lebanon
“The world, and especially NATO members, must strongly condemn his outrageous threats against Israel and force him to end his support for Hamas,” Lapid wrote on X.
Saddam Hussein was overthrown during the 2003 US-led invasion of Iraq. He went into hiding, but was eventually caught by US troops, convicted by an Iraqi court of crimes against humanity, and executed by hanging in 2006.
The US under President George W. Bush claimed at the time that the Iraqi leader had connections to Al-Qaeda – a group behind the 9/11 terrorist attacks – and had weapons of mass destruction. Both claims later turned out to be false, but Washington used them as rationale for attacking Iraq, despite having failed to secure the approval of the UN Security Council.
Copyright Strikes Silence Paris Olympics Critics
The opening ceremony of the Paris Olympics, characterized by constant rain and technical issues and concluding with the Olympic flag being hung upside down, has sparked controversy and garnered criticism from multiple quarters. However, those looking to criticize the ceremony online have been hit with strict copyright takedown notices from the International Olympic Committee that totally ignore the idea of fair use for commentary and criticism.
The ceremony, which extended over four hours, was fraught with gaffes and audio issues, compounded by heavy rain that hindered the performances of international stars like Lady Gaga and the array of 3,000 performers, making it difficult for audiences to see the spectacle.
The narrative took an unexpected turn with a sequence designed to emulate the spirit of a festive gathering, mirroring the iconic biblical scene of The Last Supper, as painted by Leonardo da Vinci, but infused with drag performers.
This segment, part of a series of artistic expressions named after French values like freedom and equality, featured models, fashion icons, and drag queens, embodying a celebration on a bridge over the Seine that also served as a runway.
Elon Musk expressed his disapproval of X, emphasizing that the portrayal was “extremely disrespectful to Christians” and lamenting the perceived decline of Christian cultural influence by stating, “Christianity has become toothless.”
The ceremony prominently featuring a rider on a pale horse parading along the river Seine captured significant attention. This striking scene quickly transcended the immediate spectacle, sparking broader conversations online. On X, a user posted a picture of the pale horse and its rider, drawing parallels to ominous imagery from cultural lore. The image and its association with the figure of Death from the Book of Revelation resonated deeply, prompting discussions and interpretations of its symbolic significance at the Olympics.
The user’s post echoed apocalyptic themes, remarking, “If you have any doubt what is going on at the Olympics opening ceremony. A single rider on a pale horse is straight out of the book of Revelation,” accompanying the clip with a haunting quote: “And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and the name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him. And power was given unto them over the fourth part of the earth, to kill with sword, and with hunger, and with death, and with the beasts of the earth.”
However, these efforts to critique or highlight certain aspects of the ceremony faced a significant roadblock. A number of these posts were quickly hit with copyright strikes, leading to their removal from the platform.
This action sparked further discussion among users about the boundaries of fair use, especially in the context of a global event meant for public viewing.
The International Olympic Committee has exhibited an increasingly aggressive stance in protecting its copyrighted materials. This protective behavior extends to cracking down on unauthorized sharing of video clips and images, especially when used for criticism or commentary on social media platforms. Critics argue that such stringent enforcement not only curtails fair use but also stifles public discourse surrounding the Olympics.
Fair use is a legal doctrine that allows limited use of copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder, particularly for criticism, commentary, education, and news reporting. This doctrine supports free expression by recognizing that uses like criticism and commentary add new insights or meanings to original works, making them transformative and thus permissible. These uses are essential for fostering public discourse and allowing a critical engagement with cultural and media productions.
Elon Musk responded to the censorship saying: “This is overzealous application of DMCA. The law permits limited use of copyrighted material in special circumstances.”
The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) of 1998, designed to protect copyrights in the digital era, has come under criticism for its “notice-and-takedown” process. This procedure allows copyright holders to request the rapid removal of content they claim infringes their rights, without requiring proof before action is taken. While intended to safeguard intellectual property, it’s often used to aggressively suppress legitimate uses like criticism and commentary, particularly evident in actions taken by organizations like the International Olympic Committee (IOC). This system, skewed in favor of copyright holders, lacks penalties for false claims, leading to potential abuse. Such a setup discourages free expression and can lead to a less informed public discourse about significant events like the Olympics, highlighting a crucial flaw in the DMCA’s structure.
BOMBSHELL: Trump Shooter Was Known to Authorities 90 Minutes Before Shooting
Thomas Matthew Crooks was identified as a possible threat at least 90 minutes before he tried to kill Donald Trump, according to text messages obtained by The New York Post.
The Post obtained text messages between members of the Beaver County Emergency Unit that was aiding Secret Service in policing the event. According to The Post, these messages provide “a more concrete—and earlier—timeline leading up to the shooting.”
The messages show that Crooks was also aware of law enforcement as he prepared his assassination attempt.
“Someone followed our lead and snuck in and parked by our cars just so you know,” a counter-sniper texted a colleague as he headed out around 4:26 p.m.
“I’m just letting you know because you see me go out with my rifle and put it in my car so he knows you guys are up there sitting to the direct right on a picnic table about 50 yards from the exit,” he wrote of the suspicious person who turned out to be Crooks.
At about 5.10 pm, according to the Post, Crooks was “below the counter-snipers who were inside the AGR International building warehouse where the 20-year-old eventually climbed onto the roof of and fired his AR-15 from.”
One of the counter-snipers took photos of him and posted them to a group chat less than 20 minutes later.
Another officer wrote in a text that they should tell the Secret Service about the suspicious person they had seen with a rangefinder.
“Kid learning around the building we are in. AGR I believe it is,” the text reads. “I did see him with a range finder looking towards stage [sic]. FYI. If you wanna notify SS snipers to look out. I lost sight of him.”
“Call it in to command and have a uniform check it out,” an officer texted.
The texts throw into doubt previous claims that the authorities knew about Crooks roughly an hour before the shooting, as was claimed at a recent congressional hearing.
Our understanding of the extent of Crooks’ planning, and the failures by Secret Service and local law enforcement to prevent him from carrying out his attack, continues to grow; although a proper understanding of his motive, beyond his aim to kill the president, is still yet to be establisged.
Secret Service Director Kimberley Cheatle stepped down last week in response to the outrage over her agency’s failure to protect the former president from the attempt on his life.
Most Americans Want Biden to Resign Now – Poll
Most American voters agree that US President Joe Biden should resign from office now, while a vast majority approve of his decision not to seek reelection, a Rasmussen Reports poll has suggested.
The survey results released on Friday showed that 52% of respondents agree that Biden should resign before his term expires. The same poll found that 76% supported his decision to drop out of the race.
Only 18% of respondents disapproved of Biden ending his campaign. The poll was conducted from July 22 to 24 and involved 1,074 registered voters.
Immediately after Biden announced that he was quitting the race, Republican lawmakers in Congress started to openly call for him to leave the White House before his term expires.
House Speaker Mike Johnson claimed earlier this month that if Biden is not fit to run for president, “he is not fit to serve as president” adding that “he must resign the office immediately.”
“Doesn’t have the mental acuity or cognitive ability to run a political campaign but can serve for six more months as president? He should resign,” Republican Congresswoman Nancy Mace wrote.
READ MORE: Trump leads Harris – polls
Senator Rick Scott, former governor of Florida, echoed these remarks.
“Let me be clear, if Joe Biden can’t run for re-election, he is not capable of serving as president for the next six months and needs to resign today,” Scott said. “While we welcome the news that one of America’s most destructive presidents will be denied a second term, it changes very little as to the stakes of this election.”
Biden announced that he was ending his reelection campaign on July 21. The announcement came after weeks of growing concerns among Democrats and party donors over his declining health and ability to defeat Donald Trump in November, especially after his disastrous performance in the debate against his Republican rival. While initially defiant, Biden argued that the move was necessary, given the high stakes of the election.
In the wake of his withdrawal, Biden endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris as his successor. Harris has so far secured the support of the Clintons and the Obamas; however, in the polls she lags behind the former US president, according to the latest surveys.