News

Malaysia become the first country to warn its citizens against visiting Britain as riots continue across the country. The notice, released via Malaysia’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, said it was “closely monitoring the series of […]

The post Countries Warn Citizens Against Visiting The UK As Riots Continue appeared first on The People’s Voice.

Keir Starmer has sent a clear message to the people of Britain: your opinions on immigration don’t matter

“It doesn’t matter.”

The murder of three British girls—aged six, seven and nine—at a dance class by the 17-year-old son of a Rwanda immigrant.

“It doesn’t matter.”

The tens of thousands, maybe even hundreds of thousands, of white British girls targeted, raped and abused over decades, some even murdered, by Asian Muslim gangs, simply for being white and non-Muslim.

“It doesn’t matter.”

The deliberate social and political transformation of Britain through mass immigration, beginning with Tony Blair’s New Labour and continuing for the last 27 years under successive governments on both sides of the political aisle—which the British public never voted for and on numerous occasions voted explicitly to reject.

It doesn’t matter. None of it matters. That’s exactly what British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said on Sunday—he used those very words: “It doesn’t matter”—as he made a televised public statement about the disorder that has convulsed Britain in recent days.

“Do you believe that everyone taking part in this disorder is part of the far right, and do any of the scenes we’re seeing give you pause for thought about divisions in the country or how you approach other broader domestic policy areas?” a journalist asked the Prime Minister after he read his prepared statement.

“If you target people because of the colour of their skin or their faith, then that is far right and I’m prepared to say so. But it doesn’t matter what apparent motivation there is. This is violence. It is not protest. It doesn’t matter what the motivation is.”

The possibility of understanding the protests and violence, of addressing the root causes—the deep-rooted anger and frustration at the effects of mass immigration, including the murder of British children in dance classes and at concerts—has been totally foreclosed. Instead, the state will pursue retribution and nothing else.

“Be in no doubt, those that have participated in this violence will face the full force of the law,” the Prime Minister said, addressing the camera like the proverbial small mammal trapped in the beam of an oncoming car.

Still, the determination in his voice was clear.

“The police will be making arrests. Individuals will be held on remand, charges will follow and convictions will follow.

“I guarantee you will regret taking part in this disorder, whether directly or those whipping up this action online and then running away themselves. This is not a protest, it is organised, violent thuggery, and it has no place on our streets or online.”

The arrests and convictions have already begun, and no doubt in the coming days, weeks and months we’ll see a whole raft of measures design to combat the “far right” in Britain and other boogeymen of the British uniparty establishment, including the Russians and their dreaded disinformation machine, which has already been blamed in the liberal media for helping to whip up anger against Britain’s Muslims. Labour has previously said they want to ban VPNs and end internet anonymity too, so don’t be surprised when new legislation targets those things as well. The government will tell us it’s all part and parcel of the same dangerous phenomenon.

It didn’t have to be like this. A day earlier, on Saturday, Hampshire’s Police and Crime Commissioner Donna Jones broke ranks and issued a statement calling for calm and a measured response. Ms Jones didn’t excuse the violence or vandalism—she later reiterated that “those acting outside of the law should expect to feel the full force of it”—but she made clear that prosecution could not address the deep causes of the unrest, and she even went so far as to acknowledge the nobility of the motivations of many of those who were protesting.

“The commonality amongst the protest groups appears to be focused on three key areas—the desire to protect Britain’s sovereignty, the need to uphold British values and, in order to do this, stop illegal immigration.”

“The government must acknowledge what is causing this civil unrest in order to prevent it,” she added.

“Arresting people, or creating violent disorder units, is treating the symptom and not the cause.”

For putting her head above the parapet and saying what many reasonable people are thinking, people who abhor violence and wish for nothing other than a peaceful, functioning society, which Britain once was—a place where young girls were not stabbed as they danced and laughed like children should do, or hunted in the streets at night by gangs of sex attackers imported from alien regions thousands of miles away—Ms Jones has been roundly criticized and will no doubt lose her job soon.

Mr Starmer owes his job as Prime Minister to popular anger at mass immigration. He knows this, but he cannot acknowledge it. It was disgust at the Conservative Party’s repeated failures to stem mass immigration, despite explicit manifesto promises over decades to reduce it to manageable levels “in the tens of thousands,” that led to the massive defection from Conservatives to Reform and handed Starmer the keys to Number 10. Starmer rules with a huge majority in the House of Commons but only the explicit backing of 20% of the British electorate. He is one of the least popular Labour leaders since the end of World War II, for reasons that have been on clear display over the last few days and will become even clearer with the passage of time. Only cranks and oddjobs like Michael Foot and Ed Miliband have inspired less confidence in voters.

Reform got four million votes, 15% of the total, but just five seats. The system is broken, of course, and people know it.

I’m not condoning the violence. I’ve not encouraged it either. I’ve merely watched, stunned and surprised at the depth and extent of the anger and determination among my fellow Britons, who we’ve been told until now are a “conquered” population, reconciled to their eclipse and eventual replacement, not even a century after the sun set on the greatest empire the world has ever seen.

Whatever your thoughts on the violence, it should be obvious that treating a population the way the native British have been treated for the last three decades or longer is going to create a very dangerous situation indeed.

Every other demographic in the UK is allowed to speak up and represent its own interests. Every other demographic is allowed to protest and to organise on the basis of its own supposed interests, and even to use violence or the threat of violence as a tool to get what it wants. During 2020, when the Summer of Floyd madness crossed the pond and black groups like “Forever Family” started drilling in the streets of London, in military uniform—in contravention of the Public Order Act of 1936—politicians gushed about anti-racism and “took the knee” in solidarity. One of those politicians, surprise surprise, was Keir Starmer.

The second-class status afforded the native people of Britain, dhimmis in their own homelands, has been on full display throughout the official response to the disorder. Scarcely believable footage showed a police officer with a bullhorn urging a Muslim mob to return to their local mosque and deposit their weapons there. We all know that such treatment would never be afforded a mob or even a group of white British men. Armed or unarmed, white British protestors and even bystanders face the rather different treatment that can only be administered by jackboot and baton. The mainstream media has done its very best to hide the fact that roving gangs of armed Muslim men chanting “Allahu Akhbar!,” including a group calling itself the “Muslim Defence League,” were present and attacking protestors—and anybody white they could get their hands on—with gusto.

By telling white British men and women that their opinions about mass immigration don’t matter, Keir Starmer wasn’t telling them anything new. They already know their country isn’t their own. They know their voice will not be heard. Instead, the Prime Minister was simply reaffirming his support for the project to transform Britain by replacing its people, and in doing so, ensuring the violence will continue. Nice one, Keir.

Welcome to the future where online speech lands you in real-life jail

A British man filmed as a pair of police officers entered his home and arrested him for “improper use of the electronic communications network” under the Communications Act.

A female cop stood in the man’s living room and explained he was being hauled into the police station over “some comments” he made “on a Facebook page.”

“Oh, a Facebook crime is it?” the man asked.

??? “Am I going to be locked up for the night? Do I need to bring my medications?”

Welcome to 2024 Britain where The Police arrive at your home to arrest you for comments made on Facebook.

As Britain descends into lawless chaos – the Governments priority clearly isn’t fixing… pic.twitter.com/YmxBj92aCl

— Concerned Citizen (@BGatesIsaPyscho) August 5, 2024

“We have reports that you made some comments that are offensive, obscene and people have made complaints about that and they’ve come from a Facebook account with your names,” the female officer said.

When the man asked if he was going to be “locked up for the night,” the cops said, “Hopefully not,” with the policewoman adding, “unless you film us.”

The video ended with the “suspect” standing up for the officers to place him in handcuffs.

There are no details regarding what the man posted online, but it could be related to recent unrest in the nation with violent protests erupting across the country.

The Orwellian scene comes as loads of Muslim men roam UK streets armed with knives, hammers and swords looking for British citizens protesting the invasion of their country.

---

Our government lied about what happened that day.

Benny Johnson traveled to Butler, Pennsylvania to uncover the truth about the Trump assassination attempt.

We were millimeters away from an execution of President Trump on LIVE TV — how the hell did this happen?

We were millimeters away from a live execution of President Trump on TV.

How could this happen?

Our government lied about what happened that day.

We traveled to Butler, PA to find the truth about the Trump assassination. The most important documentary we’ve ever done

WATCH: pic.twitter.com/nmyNPuzv3B

— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) August 4, 2024

---

Prasad labeled the study as flawed.

Dr. Vinay Prasad posted a video Sunday in which he critiqued a study claiming to show that the Covid vaccination actually lowers heart attack risk, despite other research indicating the exact opposite.

“This paper’s got all the hallmarks of a big dataset, but it’s got a lot of big problems,” he said. “When you have very very large datasets, you can find easily P-values that are extremely signifiant…finding these P-values is a triviality, whether you actually have your finger on a causal relationship, that’s the real question in these papers.”

What the doctor was saying is that with a large dataset, in this case 46 million people, it is often possible to find whatever relationship you are looking for, regardless of actual causality between the relationship. In this case the relationship is Covid vaccination and heart attack risk.

“Basically what they find is across the board, every additional dose you get they think there is a lower risk of arterial clots and heart attacks and things like that,” Prasad said, nearly laughing at the findings.

Prasad went on to criticize vaccine-lover Dr. Vin Gupta who lauded these ‘findings’ in a post on social media, embarrassingly, appearing to confuse the medical journal Nature and its lesser offshoot Nature Communications.

“‘Accountability is coming to the misinformer near you!’ That’s what Vin Gupta writes. Apparently he’s a doctor who’s featured on NBC and MSNBC,” Prasad said. “Well, interesting thing right off the bat, this is in Nature Communications, not Nature. And so when he says that this is the world’s ‘signature and most prestigious medical journal’ I think he’s confused Nature with Nature Communications, that’s a big difference, okay. Nature Communications is like Bronny James, it’s not LeBron, okay, it’s Bronny.”

“If the editors of Nature Genetics feel the work is not of broad enough interest for them – perhaps it would not make it onto page two of the New York Times – they might suggest Nature Communications,” Merlin Crossley said in Campus Morning Mail in 2020. “In the past if your work wasn’t accepted in Nature or Science researchers would often try the respected general journal, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA, or PNAS – which wags dubbed ‘Probably Not Accepted in Science’…Researchers were happy to publish there because again the journal leveraged the Nature name.”

Prasad discussed how the people who either get one, two or three doses are often very different types of people with very different heart attack risks, which has caused the causality to be unfounded in the deduction that the Covid vaccine reduced heart attack risk. It was not adjusted for other factors, meaning it likely has a lot of residual confounding, according to Prasad.

The other problem Prasad said the study has is that those who had heart attacks and strokes and didn’t take the Covid vaccine will only be put into the group of people who didn’t get the shot and had heart attacks, despite the fact that it has no relation to the Covid vaccine actually reducing heart attack risk. Prasad said that the study didn’t correct for these discrepancies, called falsification endpoints.

Prasad went on to the next problem with the study.

“Problem four are people like doctor Vin Gupta. ‘Legions of white coats who continue to spread misinformation’ [referencing Gupta’s post]. You know I suspect from listening to his other comments, what I think I’ve talked about on this channel because he’s said some pretty stupid things about President Biden’s mental health, you can go back and watch those videos. Vin Gupta, he seems to me like an ideologue, he appears on MSNBC and I might venture to guess that he’s a passionate Democrat, okay, from the kinds of things he says and he’s so blinded by his ideology that he thinks anybody who doubts vaccine safety, Covid-19 vaccine safety, must be spreading misinformation.”

He also said that the paper was poorly written and that the tables are a mess.

Prasad went on to discuss unflawed studies that do indicate harm to the heart and cardiovascular system from the Covid vaccine.

The doctor concluded by saying that people should never attribute to malice that which incompetence can explain and that this paper, which he described with the word ‘shitty’ doesn’t even belong in Nature Communications, but rather the trashcan.

“They’re not competent, they’re very very dumb, often they don’t know basic things, they’re not using their brain,” he said. “Not a day goes by where I don’t see somebody with all the greatest degrees on earth say something really, really fucking stupid.”

The Covid shots are known to:

• Make people retarded 
• Increase in lethality after repeated doses 
• Double the death rate of Covid patients
• Vaxxed kids face a 4,423 percent higher all-cause mortality rate
• 74 percent of the vaccinated who’ve died were killed by the shots
• The death rate is still higher than what is reported
• The shot increases Covid infection rates
• The shot increases all cause mortality 
• The shot increasing the death numbers 
• The shot causes tons of bizarre and unusual skin disorders 
• Massive increases of insane and gross turbocancers
• Colon cancers
• Reproductive destruction
• Miscarriages
• Eye paralyzation 
• Parkinson’s 
• Tinnitus 
• Hepatitis
• Blood clots in the brain 
• Non-serious disorders
• Death by neurological disorders 
• Has increased excess death rates
• Autoimmune disorders in the thyroid
• As well as deadly headaches, seizures, heart inflammation and irregularities including in children,
• It causes people’s skin to ‘erupt’
• A multitude of serious ailments seen in massive population studies 
• Contains hundreds of times the allowable levels of DNA contamination leading to mutagenic effects
• It has contaminated the blood supply
• It has permanently altered the DNA of the vaccinated and their offspring
• While some batches are worse than others and Moderna kills 30 percent more than Pfizer
• The shots are still killing people and are expected to kill people for a very long time into the future

In the U.S. the CDC recommends that all Americans receive their Covid shot and that young children receive extra, as well as that all Americans now receive another shot, despite receiving them previously, while Canada recommends another Covid shot for the pregnant, indigenous, ‘racialized’ & ‘equity-deserving’.

---

BREAKING VIDEO: UN Spokesperson Calls For NATO/UN Troops To Occupy Western Nations To Enforce Lockdowns, Force Injections

---

Sperling’s shift to senior economic adviser to Harris’ policy team was revealed by White House officials under the condition of anonymity

White House senior economic adviser Gene Sperling has just left the Biden administration to work with Vice President Kamala Harris’ election campaign, according to reports.

The move came Monday, on the same day stock markets collapsed worldwide.

“Gene joined my administration as the only person to have ever directed the National Economic Council under two presidents, and has helped me execute a rescue plan that has led to one of the most equitable and resilient economic recoveries ever,” said Biden in a Monday statement. “Under Gene’s leadership, the American Rescue Plan has delivered economic relief to cities and counties across the country, protected millions of union pensions, made the largest-ever federal investment in public safety, and kept thousands of small businesses afloat.”

Sperling’s shift to senior economic adviser to Harris’ policy team was revealed by White House officials under the condition of anonymity according to The Hill.

“Sperling served both Bill Clinton and Barack Obama as director of the White House National Economic Council,” reports Josh Boak from The Hill. “President Joe Biden Biden tasked him with managing his $1.9 trillion pandemic aid package, a role in which Sperling implemented the temporary expansion of the child tax credit.”

“He was also the White House liaison to the union and car companies during the auto strikes.”

This story is developing…

---

Venezuela Descends Into Anarchy / Civil War As Dictator Maduro Fights For Control

---