News

If Trump is sent to jail it could be the perfect place for a hit job to take place

Roger Stone joined The Alex Jones Show Thursday to lay out the morbid possibility that the Deep State could try and murder Donald Trump, which would further divide the nation and cause total chaos.

“They killed one president [Kennedy], I don’t think the Deep State is beyond killing another president,” Stone said.

Also:

---

Death of Polish soldier comes days after German police officer murdered by jihadist from Afghanistan

A Polish soldier has died after being stabbed by a migrant along the border with Belarus, according to reports.

Just after 4 a.m. on May 28, a group of around 50 migrants tried to break through the border barrier near Dubicze Cerkiewne, throwing sticks, tree branches, and stones at patrols.

During the skirmish, a Polish Army soldier was stabbed in the ribs by a migrant who managed to jab a knife through a gap in the steel border fence, as InfoWars reported last week.

Surveillance footage released by the Polish Border Guard showed an officer administering first aid to the serviceman as combatants continued to lob projectiles at them.

On Thursday, Polish authorities announced the wounded soldier, identified only as Mateuszu, tragically succumbed to his injuries.

“We regret to inform you that on June 6 in the afternoon, a stabbed soldier of the 1st Armored Brigade died at the Military Medical Institute in Warsaw, surrounded by the support of his family and soldiers,” the General Command of the Armed Forces wrote on social media.

“Despite the help provided in the area of ​​the bandit attack on the border with Belarus and the efforts of doctors, his life could not be saved.”

No further information about the soldier has been made public.

The death of Mateuszu comes just days after a German police officer was murdered by a knife-wielding jihadist from Afghanistan in the city of Mannheim.

Infowars has covered the ongoing crisis at the Poland-Belarus border extensively.

---

Dan Lyman on X | Gab

A key to this process is to cut expenditures ahead of inflation, creating a cushion in your budget.

Taken from the Minor Issues Podcast

People can’t stop the Federal Reserve from inflating the money supply, nor can we prevent them from adding more fuel to their fire.

We can only fight the fire started by the arsonists at the Fed from spreading further into our lives.

In this article, I want to review the ways that people fight the Fed’s fire—higher prices everywhere and the reasons why everyone should be actively fighting against inflation.

These techniques require some thinking, choosing, and acting, which isn’t a pleasant thing to do. Budgeting helps us set a pattern in life, and the Fed’s inflation disrupts our “pattern” in a bad way.

Most people will respond that they are not willing to do those things, or that they can’t do those things. I would encourage you to listen and think them over. You might come up with workarounds or even better ideas. Send me your ideas.

Other people will respond that they already do these things, and a few people might even respond that is the way we have always done things.

In fact, most people have already had to make some adjustments because of the Fed’s inflation, which is why people consider it to be one of the worst problems they face. They were forced to adjust their lives in a bad way because of rising prices and stagnant incomes.

I would argue that it is better to take preemptive measures to fight inflation now rather than HAVE TO passively respond when the Fed tightens your belt. The passive/desperate response is typically confused and not your best alternative. You are likely not going to make the best decisions when the pressure is on, and you may turn to credit cards. You tend to “blame life” when your ire should be reserved for the Fed itself. These suggestions are offered because they might be better for you to consider in terms of economics, personal psychology, and health.

Steps to consider:

1. Increase your income. Your labor is in demand, and maybe someone other than your current employer has a better offer for you in terms of wages, benefits, and risk. Like many things on my list, this may not apply to you or may not be something you “want” to do. Keep track of your responses.
2. You may be able to increase your hours of work. Many employers are seeking extra workers. Maybe your boss would consider more hours of work, preferably at “overtime” rates.
3. Increase your workplace skills. You may be able to move up with your current employer, increase your skills for a better type of job, or develop a new skill where you can earn money in your spare time.
4. Work that you can do for yourself instead of hiring someone else is more important when you consider you are paying with after-tax income. You may have to earn $1,000 to pay someone $680 to paint your fence. If you take care of your own yard, clean your own house, fix your own stuff, you save lots of money. You don’t need an expensive gym membership.
5. Cut your spending. This is a big one that will be divided up into several categories. Every expenditure category can be reduced eventually. You may not be able to reduce your car or house expenditure today, but you can start thinking about it today and start to develop your alternatives.
6. Housing: it is hard to reduce housing expenses, but it’s a big one. What would be more efficient for your family in terms of size, number of bedrooms, rent or own? Most households actually have multiple unused rooms which means higher mortgages, rents, and power bills.
7. Although it is fraught with dangers, consider renting space or sharing apartment expenses with a trustworthy friend or relative. I told you people would balk at some of these suggestions.
8. How about that storage unit? That, in effect, is a part of “housing expense” that many could do without or do without in some other way. There are twenty-five million storage units in this country!
9. Electric power is a big expense for heating and cooling. Adjust your thermostat a couple of degrees and your clothing as well. In summer, use fans and a dehumidifier in wetter climates and fans and humidifiers in dry climates.
10. Try to eliminate alcohol, tobacco, and other goods with high taxes, such as reducing the amount of gasoline you use by walking, carpooling, and making multistep trips. Not only are you saving money and getting healthier, but you are also starving the beast that is trying to ruin your family’s life.
11. Food is a big expense. Many Americans have already downsized from restaurants to fast food joints to save money. But fast food has also gone up in price. The Street reports that fast food items have increased roughly 100 percent since covid. Consider fixing more of your meals at home so you are not paying for the higher cost of labor and minimum wage law
12. Plus, you are developing your home “survival” skills. I’m not talking great skills here, just making a peanut butter and jelly sandwich, for example. Using Kroger store brand prices, I calculate you can make a standard peanut butter and jelly sandwich for fifty cents, which comes in at almost four hundred calories. Add a glass of milk and a piece of fruit or a handful of nuts for a healthy, quick, and cheap meal. The “keto” version of peanut butter and jelly that I make all by myself is closer to $1.50.
13. Multiply these savings by cutting your calories. Most Americans, including those in “poverty,” are overweight, and the best overall thing we can do for our health is to go on a calorie restricted diet of around 90 percent of the calories we usually consume.
14. Now that you have changed where and what you eat, try buying larger sizes. In my peanut butter example above, the one-pound jar is 15 percent more expensive per ounce than the forty-ounce jar (plus more sales taxes). The two-pack of sugar free peanut butter that I buy at Sam’s Club is less than nine dollars. If you reserve your “bulk” purchases to those items on sale that week, your savings can increase dramatically. Yes, I know some people don’t like peanut butter and others are allergic. This is just an example.
15. There are many items that can be bought in larger quantities, but there are two qualifications. First, only buy big when you already use the product on a regular basis. And second, make sure it’s not something that will go bad. Cleaning supplies, paper goods, basic toiletries, and hygiene products, as well as salt, black pepper, and garlic powder can be considered.
16. I’m not going to recommend that you start farming crops, raising chickens, or buying sides of beef, but perhaps picking your own strawberries for freezing, growing your favorite cooking herb, or comparing prices at a farmers’ market is up for you to try. It’s a start.
17. Many of these suggestions require a bit of knowledge and experience to pull off correctly. However, learning is typically low cost, tax free, and can either save or earn money. Look for opportunities that interest you and that you already show an aptitude for.

A key to this process is to cut expenditures ahead of inflation, creating a cushion in your budget. The savings will not be enormous immediately but can widen over time. One part can be given over to family-style entertainment or money saving tools, another part to create a savings cushion, and a third can be used to pay down variable rate loans like credit card debts. Interest on credit card balances is often the worst family budget offender, and its elimination should be a top priority.

All of these suggestions are not original to me but come from people with some standing on such family budgetary problems. Adopting some of them will help you weather the inflationary storm and make you a more stable and better qualified opponent of the state.

---

POWERFUL — MUST WATCH: The Globalist System Is Collapsing In Real Time, Warns Bilderberg Expert Daniel Estulin

---

Nayib Bukele describes how one member left MS-13 after witnessing baby being sacrificed ‘because the beast asked for a baby.’

The MS-13 Central American criminal gang network, which has infiltrated the US, practices satanism and conducts ritual child sacrifice, El Salvador President Nayib Bukele informed Tucker Carlson.

Discussing MS-13’s formation and prominence in El Salvador as a murderous international drug cartel, Bukele described the gang “are satanic also,” saying as it grew in size and expanded to the US the gang also “became satanic” and “started doing satanic rituals.”

Bukele went on to describe how one imprisoned former member who committed a slew of murders for the gang told interviewers he was no longer affiliated with MS-13 after refusing to participate in the ritual sacrifice of a baby.

Whoa. The President of El Salvador just told Tucker that MS 13 participates in Satanic child sacrifice rituals after he saved the country from the gang takeover that infected the nation.
But the mainstream media told me that this was supposed to be a conspiracy theory?
This is a… pic.twitter.com/Gy4Og0tpsN

— Green Lives Matter (@Ultrafrog17) June 6, 2024

“He said, ‘Well, I was used to kill people. But I killed for territory. I killed for to collect money. I killed for extortion. But I came… to this house and they were, they were about to kill a baby,” Bukele told Tucker.

“And he, the killer that had killed tens of people, said, ‘Oh, wait, what are we doing? Why are we going to kill that baby?’ And they told him, because the beast asked for a baby. So we have to give him a baby… So he left the gang,” Bukele recounted.

“He’s in prison because he’s a killer. But he left the gang because he couldn’t tolerate what he was seeing,” Bukele described, adding he’d heard of a similar ritualistic murder recently happening in the US.

The Central American leader went on to highlight the spiritual war taking place between good and evil, attributing his success in the physical world and in politics to winning the spiritual battle.

“There’s a spiritual war, and there’s a physical war, and the physical war…that’s the unofficial. That’s the artificial version. The spiritual, if you win the spiritual war, it will reflect into the physical war,” Bukele told Tucker.

“So our, I think our… impressive victory was because we won the spiritual war, very, very fast. Because [I] didn’t have competition. I mean, they were satanic. I think that made it easier.”

The Central American president’s remarks giving insight on the criminal gang members targeted in mass arrests came during a wide-ranging discussion with Carlson released on X Wednesday.

President Nayib Bukele saved El Salvador. He may have the blueprint for saving the world. pic.twitter.com/92etFh7sSI

— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) June 6, 2024

---

The globalists are increasing their attacks on Infowars and the stakes have never been higher!

Please consider donating and visit InfowarsStore.com for merch, nutraceuticals and survival gear.

---

Follow the author on X, Facebook, Gab, Minds, Truth Social and Gettr.

---

---

In the end, it isn’t the financial class who pays the price, but the people forced to use, save, and spend in devalued currencies that get micromanaged into fiat oblivion.

On one hand, the Band of Japan says that it wants long-term interest rates to be dictated by market forces.

But on the other hand, the BoJ has been spending 6 trillion yen per month buying bonds to prop up its currency. In other words, it’s doing everything in the world to control short-term interest rates with bond-buying programs and yen interventions, free markets be damned. 

Expected to discuss tapering more of its bond-buying program at its next meeting, BoJ governor Kazuo Ueda said, as reported by Reuters:

“Our basic stance is to allow long-term interest rates to be driven by market forces.”

Yet during a separate appearance at a meeting in Tokyo, BoJ deputy governor Ryozo Himino said:

“On the other hand, the BOJ has been deeply involved in the bond market up till very recently and our presence remains very large. We need to avoid causing discontinuity or any unintended moves in the market.”

It’s obvious to anyone paying attention that the BoJ has no interest at all in allowing anything remotely resembling a free market to take over. Indeed, the shock would be tremendous after decades of negative interest rate policy, but it’s laughable for any modern central bank to claim any embrace of “market forces.”

The entire point of a central bank is to attempt to override market forces with bond-buying programs and other monetary policy wizardry — a true embrace of free markets would mean that central banks no longer need to exist. Japan hasn’t let markets manage themselves for an incredibly long time.

As of this writing, the yen is up slightly against USD as the world awaits hints of what news might come from the BoJ’s meeting next week. Will it continue as-is, or will it taper its bond-buying program to foster tightened economic conditions after many years of holding interest rates at negative?

Yen vs USD, 1-Month

Source

Without major foreign reserves other than US Treasuries, the BoJ may be forced to sell them to stop the yen from collapsing. This will drive up US Treasury bond yields and reduce the prices of those bonds, which will only weaken the yen further, leaving the BoJ trapped in a vicious spiral.

Once bond yields get too high, inflation often follows, leaving the Fed locked into a trap of its own where it has to interest lower rates to save the real estate and banking sectors. However, those rate cuts will contribute even more to inflationary pressure that’s already on its way to spinning out of control.

Meanwhile, central bank guessing games will continue to have banking industry insiders and disconnected Keynesian academics playing God with the economy — and the lives of citizens. Like all central banks, the BoJ is a house of contradictions and pseudoscience, with near-dictatorial power over the levers of finance. In the end, it isn’t the financial class who pays the price, but the people forced to use, save, and spend in devalued currencies that get micromanaged into fiat oblivion.

---

POWERFUL — MUST WATCH: The Globalist System Is Collapsing In Real Time, Warns Bilderberg Expert Daniel Estulin

---

Government overreach made DEI flourish, so we shouldn’t be surprised when some firms realize they must cut costs. The DEI ship is sinking, and one wishes it would take university bureaucracies with it.

The Board of Trustees at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, on May 13, announced that they would be diverting the $2.3 million that the university spends on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies toward campus safety amidst protests over the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. UNC-Chapel Hill joins a list of universities like the University of Florida and the University of Texas that have eliminated their DEI programs in part due to lawmaker pressure.

Protestors have boiled up on college campuses, voicing their concerns and demands for schools they claim are supporting the Israeli war effort in Gaza. At Chapel Hill, the school was woken up on the morning of May 11 to vandalism of an administration building, the same day as its commencement ceremony. It has since voted to eliminate its DEI program in favor of greater campus safety.

It took protestors as well as lawmakers in other states to eliminate DEI programs. However, why did universities get so invested in DEI programs that often exist only to push Maoist-style racial tensions on their campuses? Ludwig von Mises gives us an answer from his 1944 bookBureaucracy. The government caused these schools to diverge from what Mises properly dubs “profit management” and into bureaucratic, and often pseudo-Marxist, management.

Universities, like all other institutions that deal in the buying and selling of scarce resources, are businesses. They offer services—education, in their specific case—in exchange for payment—tuition paid by students. The financing of a student’s purchase of education is certainly caught up in government intervention, but that is another issue entirely.

However, universities certainly do buy scarce resources to sell to students. Professors must be hired, buildings must be obtained, and other educational materials don’t simply fall from the sky. Students certainly buy the services of universities. They may be doing so just for the sake of earning a diploma in a field they love. Most will treat their education as a higher-order good to reach lower-ordered goods they truly desire (perhaps a career path they enjoy or financial success). Universities are businesses, plain and simple.

The idea that a university isn’t one has seeped in alongside government spending in them. Some will cite necessary research conducted in universities as a part of the education imparted to students, but this positive externality is true of every business. Yet politicians use this justification almost exclusively for subsidizing higher education and setting controls on it. (Worry not! They have other excuses for getting in everyone else’s business!)

Value is certainly created when universities are run like businesses. The very fact that a university profits at all is a sign that it is efficiently using the resources available to it to provide for its customers—the students. Students derive value from it; that is plain enough to see by their willingness to pay tuition. If they didn’t value the service, they wouldn’t forgo the pleasure of leisure to take up textbooks and study. However, to the encroaching politician or bureaucrat—the operations of the business alone in free exchange aren’t enough value.

To the bureaucrats, the business isn’t meeting the lofty ideals they want it to reach. Rather than use their funds as a consumer or producer to influence others, they wield a pen and gun to force businesses to comply with the lofty ideals they establish. These ideals, even those that generally are acceptable to average citizens, provide entry points for the federal leviathan.

Legislation that targets government contractors and universities that accept government funds will always necessitate compliance. “Equal employment standards,” harassment and whistleblower claims, nondiscrimination clauses, and other government-established standards force the private (or semiprivate) firms to report and track compliance. Even if they would meet these standards otherwise, now government paperwork and processes must be imported. What would otherwise be productive resources are funneled into lawyers who “help to maintain compliance” and human resource personnel who drag their feet.

These nonproductive employees and activities drag down businesses. It is no wonder that a well-established trick used by larger companies is to lobby for further regulation. Regulation makes companies into political rent seekers. The costs of compliance alone can prevent new competition from arising. However, they also drag profit-seeking firms into bureaucratic management. Mises defines “bureaucracy” as “that matter of affairs of which there is no cash value on the market.” In layman’s terms, it means that a firm or agency works bureaucratically by focusing on satisfying ends for which there is no profit to pursue. By placing ideals greater than profit, the firm goes chasing inefficiencies.

Mises also describes the despotism that this creates for private business:

Under this system the government has unlimited power to ruin every enterprise or to lavish favors upon it. The success or failure of every business depends entirely upon the free discretion of those in office. If the businessman does not happen to be a citizen of a powerful foreign nation whose diplomatic and consular agents grant him protection, he is at the mercy of the administration and the ruling party.

However, what has the government done? By establishing a myriad of legal codes and compliance costs, the firm must now create a glorified “compliance department.” These employees and departments owe their existence wholly to government edict and the tedious bookkeeping mandated by it. Thus, they must further justify their existence.

To not be resented by their employers and their coworkers, they must invent some ideals they strive toward! What better than our dreaded DEI? An apparatus has already been made. The firm has already adopted the tendencies toward inefficiency. Rather than focus on those affairs that may create more value for its consumers, these employees and departments can now pander toward these lofty ideals.

The social minority that pushes for these ideals, that otherwise would not be a marketable audience for the firm, offers just as valid advice for the conduct of this business. Better yet would be if this social minority also has the backing of the government bureaucrats that dispense funds? Why not cater to them and build better relations with the resident jailers?

DEI departments, while creating no value for the universities, are instead born of bureaucracy. Resources, like UNC-Chapel Hill’s $2.3 million, are funneled toward these new bureaucrats. Yes, they ensure compliance with government DEI edicts, but they are also given room to push their own social causes. The colleges have been turned down the road already; why turn back now when they could barrel forward?

Government regulation and bureaucratization created the environment for these offices to flourish. Issuing mandates that force compliance rather than cost-cutting create behaviors that provide ample ground for new bureaucrats and their ideals to flourish. Rather than consider ideas like merit, we are forced to think of people in the narrow lenses of social activists that are hired to satisfy government compliance.

Government overreach made DEI flourish, so we shouldn’t be surprised when some firms realize they must cut costs. The DEI ship is sinking, and one wishes it would take university bureaucracies with it.

---

POWERFUL — MUST WATCH: The Globalist System Is Collapsing In Real Time, Warns Bilderberg Expert Daniel Estulin

---