Putin Calls Plans To Attack NATO ‘Bullshit’
Russian President Vladimir Putin has claimed that the West is making up stories to deceive its own people. He said the idea that Moscow has some kind of plan to attack NATO is a stupid […]
The post Putin Calls Plans To Attack NATO ‘Bullshit’ appeared first on The People’s Voice.
After Covid Shot Introduction Canadian Military had 800% Increase in Vaccine Injuries
Documents acquired by media outlet LifeSiteNews documented a massive 800 percent increase in vaccine injuries experienced in members of the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) following the rollout of the Covid vaccination.
According to the documents, only 14 Canadian military members experienced a vaccine injury in 2020 while 128 were injured by vaccines in 2021, the first year the Covid vaccine was administered and 223 were injured by the shots in 2022.
Notably, the injury rate in the CAF is higher than the general population of Canada.
“According to the documents, the CAF’s vaccine injury rate is higher than Health Canada’s average. Health Canada has recorded a total of 58,712 vaccine injuries from the COVID shots, or one in every 1,789 doses,” LifeSiteNews said in their article. “However, the CAF’s 2021 numbers show that 128 out of 162,190, or 1 out of 1,267, doses resulted in an injury. In 2022, the number was even higher at 223 out of 63,962 doses, or 1 out of 287 doses.”
The bulk of the injuries resulted after vaccination with the Moderna shot.
The types of injuries listed have been seen elsewhere from the shots, including heart problems, paralysis and reproductive harm.
The Covid shots are known to increase in lethality after repeated doses and double the death rate of Covid patients while increasing excess mortality, increase Covid infection rates, result in insane and gross turbo cancers, reproductive destruction, cause miscarriages, paralyzation, increase excess death rates, autoimmune disorders in the thyroid, as well as deadly headaches, seizures and heart inflammation in addition to a multitude of serious ailments seen in massive population studies and contain hundreds of times the allowable levels of DNA contamination leading to mutagenic effects, contaminating the blood supply, as well as permanently altering the DNA of the vaccinated and their offspring while being expected to kill people for a very long time into the future.
In the U.S. the CDC recommends all Americans receive their Covid shot and that young children receive extra, while Canada recommends another Covid shot for the pregnant, indigenous, ‘racialized’ & ‘equity-deserving’.
Members of CAF were mandated to receive the shots in November 2021.
“Those who failed to do so risked dismissal or suspension without pay. While there were provisions for medical and religious exemptions, these were rarely granted,” LifeSiteNews said in their article.
BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: MTG Predicts Deep State Planning Civil Unrest / War To Cancel 2024 Election
First Human H5N2 Bird Flu Death Reported
A man in Mexico has died with a type of bird flu strain that has never been recorded in humans before now. According to the World Health Organization the victim, who was already ill with […]
The post First Human H5N2 Bird Flu Death Reported appeared first on The People’s Voice.
Spain To Join South Africa’s Genocide Case Against Israel
Spain has become on the first European country to ask the United Nations top court for permission to join South Africa’s case accusing Israel of committing genocide in Gaza. At the end of last year, […]
The post Spain To Join South Africa’s Genocide Case Against Israel appeared first on The People’s Voice.
HPV Shot Test Subjects were Injected with MASSIVE Amount of Aluminum Causing Serious Side Effects — Study
A case study on medical ethics revealed that when Merck conducted their Gardasil Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) clinical trials, they injected both the test and the placebo groups of girls and young women with a proprietary aluminum adjuvant which was extra potent, causing chronic disabling symptoms, despite the ‘informed consent’ information not mentioning the dangerous ingredient.
“The informed consent forms for Merck’s Gardasil vaccine trials appear to be seriously misleading, as a highly reactogenic adjuvant with a questionable safety record was described as an inactive placebo,” the case study said in the ‘Conclusion’ section.
An adjuvant is a vaccine ingredient that agitates the immune system into eliciting an immune response to the vaccination agent, in this case HPV.
“Merck used their proprietary amorphous aluminum hydroxyphosphate sulfate (AAHS) adjuvant as the “placebo”. The V501-018 trial however, did not use a saline placebo either, but rather the Gardasil vaccine’s carrier solution which includes L-histidine, polysorbate 80, sodium borate and residual yeast protein which is a potential allergen [7,8]. Moreover, only 1,781 children between 9 and 15 years of age were included in this trial; both male and female who were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive either Gardasil or the “placebo” [8]. By contrast, the largest pre-licensure Gardasil trial V501-015 (the FUTURE II trial), recruited 12,167 subjects, all females between 15 and 26 years of age, who were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either Gardasil or the AAHS injection [9],” the case study said in section 1 of the ‘Background’ section.
The researchers said that four years after vaccination, the test subjects had “reduced HPV-related carcinoma in situ, external genital lesions, and HPV-related treatment procedures. However, the HPV vaccines increased serious nervous system disorders and general harms.” They went on to detail the specifics.
It turns out that these medical test subjects received an aluminum dose different than the dose that patients received when getting the shot after it was officially rolled out, raising questions about the legitimacy of the trial results for real-world vaccinations.
“We further note that contrary to the EMA’s statement cited above, “the control product” in Gardasil vaccine trials did not contain “the same amount of Al(OH)3 as the study vaccine”, because the adjuvant in Gardasil is AAHS, not Al(OH)3,” the case study said in section 6 of the ‘Background’ section.
Aluminum adjuvants were discovered in 1926 and Merck’s proprietary amorphous aluminum hydroxyphosphate sulfate (AAHS) has been used in licensed vaccines since 1987.
The researchers described the inflammatory harm that the aluminum adjuvant causes the body, interestingly the harm is worse when not paired with a vaccination agent, and that harm is positively correlated to the level of immune response (effectiveness) that is elicited by the vaccine.
“Interestingly, the pro-inflammatory and pro-necrotic effect of AAHS alone was greater [27],” the case study said in section 2 of the ‘Background’ section. “The above-cited research confirms that increased immunopotency inevitably comes at the cost of increased inflammation-driven reactogenicity and reduced safety [18,19,22,28]. Accordingly, it is acknowledged that, “in animal models of autoimmune disease induction, inflammation is essential to break tolerance to self-antigens” [28]. This means that potent inflammatory adjuvants have the necessary biochemical properties to induce chronic systemic immune-mediated diseases in susceptible individuals. It is thus of concern that in comparison to traditional aluminum adjuvants AAHS was shown by Merck to be the most potent inducer of antibody responses [15].”
Section 3 of the ‘Background’ section of the case study said that the pharmaceutical company claimed that they used the proprietary aluminum adjuvant in order to ensure ‘blinding’ of the trial, so as both the vaccine and placebo groups had only one thing different between them, the viral HPV agent.
However this would also cause the vaccination group to not exhibit any unusual side effects verses the placebo group (if those side effects resulted from the adjuvant). Moreover though, Merck has preformed other studies without dosing their placebo groups with aluminum.
While the aluminum adjuvant has been in use for nearly a century, its ‘safety characteristics’ are not well understood, unsupported and likely nonexistent.
“…after almost 100 years of use, the way in which aluminum adjuvants interact with the immune system remains obscure [11,54,67–69]. For this reason, in the contemporary scientific literature, aluminum adjuvants are still sometimes referred to as the immunologists’ “dirty little secret” [70],” the case study said in section 4 of the ‘Background’ section. “It is thus perplexing that the allowable amount of aluminum in human vaccines was selected exclusively on the basis of efficacy, not safety considerations [56], even though it is acknowledged that for prophylactic vaccines given to predominantly healthy individuals safety is to be prioritized over efficacy [72,73].”
“…the advertising material for the trial and the informed consent forms stated that the placebo was saline or an inactive substance, when, in fact, it contained Merck’s proprietary highly reactogenic aluminum adjuvant which does not appear to have been properly evaluated for safety. Several trial participants experienced chronic disabling symptoms, including some randomized to the adjuvant “placebo” group,” the case study said in the ‘Results’ section.
BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: MTG Predicts Deep State Planning Civil Unrest / War To Cancel 2024 Election
More Than 300 People Who’ve Been Prosecuted for “Insurrection” on January 6 Could See Their Felony Charges Dropped
We are just weeks away from the Supreme Court’s ruling in Fisher v. United States, a case that could end up resulting in charges being dropped against the more than 300 people who are being prosecuted by the Biden regime for their involvement in the January 6 “insurrection.”
Back in April, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments on the matter. “Capitol riot” defendant Joseph W. Fisher is challenging a federal felony charge of obstructing an official proceeding, this being the same charge made against hundreds of other January 6 participants.
The same obstruction charge is the basis behind Department of Justice (DoJ) special counsel Jack Smith’s prosecution case against former President Donald Trump, the ‘ringleader’ behind what happened on January 6.
Fisher and his attorneys say the obstruction felony represents an abusive application of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which came about in the wake of the Enron scandal. The statute, they argue, was meant to address document destruction pertaining to a financial crime, not political matters such as this.
In March 2022, U.S. District Judge Carl J. Nichols ruled in Fisher’s favor by dismissing the obstruction charge against three of the January 6 defendants. However, the federal D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals reversed that ruling in a 2-1 decision in April 2023, which is how it ended up at the Supreme Court.
“The Sarbanes-Oxley Act was enacted after the 2001 Enron financial accounting fraud scandal, which saw the Texas-headquartered energy firm abruptly declare bankruptcy and dissolve its accounting firm, Arthur Andersen LLP,” The National Pulse reported. “Congress swiftly moved to address gaps in financial regulations, which they believed allowed Enron executives to perpetrate fraud.”
“Sarbanes-Oxley passed in June 2002 and contained 11 financial reporting provisions aimed at the board of directors for U.S.-based companies. Additionally, the bill enacted enhanced charges for private corporations accused of destroying documents to obstruct a federal investigation.”
(Related: Did you know that Congress has paid out $17 million in taxpayer-funded “hush money” to quietly settle sexual harassment claims?)
Supreme Court originalist justices challenge trumped-up charges
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act, found in 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2), states that anyone who alters, destroys, mutilates, or conceals a record, document, or other object – or even just attempts to do so with the intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding – shall be fined or imprisoned for no more than 20 years.
The statute also states that anyone who obstructs, influences, or impedes any official proceeding, or who attempts to do so, will face the same consequences.
Clearly the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has nothing to do with what happened on Jan. 6, 2021, but Biden’s DoJ is using it anyway to pursue enhanced felony charges against the “insurrection” participants, as well as against Trump.
The oral arguments from April resulted in the Supreme Court’s six originalist justices taking a closer look at the Biden regime over its broad application of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Justice Brett Kavanaugh challenged the DoJ on why the obstruction charges were needed, especially since Fisher already faces six other charges for his involvement.
“Why aren’t those six counts good enough?” Kavanaugh asked the Biden regime’s attorneys.
Justice Clarence Thomas also probed further to see if the Sarbanes-Oxley provision had ever even been used in a case prior to the January 6 incident. Justice Elena Kagan, who tends to lean more left, also addressed the fact that Sarbanes-Oxley was intended to address financial crimes, not protests at the Capitol.
Associate Justice Neil Gorsuch asked the Biden regime the most piercing questions, as well as pressed them to explain further in their own words why they believe Fisher’s actions qualify for prosecution under Sarbanes-Oxley.
BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: MTG Predicts Deep State Planning Civil Unrest / War To Cancel 2024 Election