‘It’s a Disgrace’ – Polish Soldiers Arrested by Military Police After Firing Warning Shots at Migrants on Belarusian Border
Polish soldiers were recently detained by military police after they fired warning shots at migrants who were aggressively attempting to cross the Polish-Belarusian border. Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of National Defense Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz condemned the arrests, emphasizing that the actions of the soldiers were in response to a direct threat and that this afforded them legal protections.
The Ministry of National Defense (MON) reported that the charges against the soldiers include endangering human life and health, as well as exceeding their authority. Following the incident, the soldiers were suspended from duty.
Kosiniak-Kamysz expressed strong support for the detained soldiers in a statement on social media platform X, stating, “The detention of soldiers firing warning shots at attacking migrants is unacceptable. The actions of the military gendarmerie towards the detainees will be absolutely clarified. Soldiers safeguarding the security of the state must be ensured that legal procedures protect them. I will always stand on the side of the honor of Polish soldiers.”
The incident took place near Dubicze Cerkiewne, where, at the end of May, a soldier was severely wounded. According to liberal news outlet Onet, when migrants crossed the border and did not retreat despite warning shots, soldiers from the 1st Warsaw Armored Brigade defensively fired into the ground, inadvertently causing ricochets that hit a fence.
The situation reportedly calmed down only after the border guard intervened, who, instead of thanking the soldiers for repelling the migrants, notified Poland’s military gendarmerie.
The Onet news portal cites a soldier’s account, stating that three of his comrades were led away in handcuffs “like bandits,” with two subsequently facing legal proceedings; they were only released after their battalion colleagues funded a lawyer.
The MON has confirmed that while the soldiers are currently free, they face charges under articles of the criminal code related to endangering life and acting to the detriment of public or private interest, with potential penalties of up to three years in prison. The prosecutor has suspended the soldiers from official duties until June 27 and placed them under supervisory orders.
Social media has been inundated with comments regarding the Polish government’s recent actions. Former Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki made a poignant appeal to those in power, stating, “Stop this madness, you are like arsonists setting fire to your own house.”
Former Deputy Foreign Minister Paweł Jabłoński criticized the operational reality of what he sarcastically referred to as Donald Tusk’s Shield-East, remarking: “This is what the Shield-East looks like in practice: the soldiers of the Polish Army are defending our border — and Bodnar’s prosecution office is charging them with criminal offenses! To say it’s a disgrace is an understatement. It is simply a shame. I understand, Prime Minister Tusk, will (Justice Minister) Adam Bodnar be dismissed first thing in the morning?”
The defense ministry has reiterated that commanders do not prohibit the use of firearms, noting that in May alone, over 700 warning shots were fired. The rules for firearm use are outlined in the law on direct coercion and the rules of engagement. Soldiers assigned to the border undergo specific training on these rules, simplified for border operations, and have access to guidance from experienced instructors and soldiers.
???WATCH: Dramatic video shows a Polish soldier brutally stabbed in his rib cage at the border by a migrant through the border fence near Belarus.
— Remix News & Views (@RMXnews) May 29, 2024
In this surveillance footage, the soldier is being treated by a fellow soldier while migrants toss objects at him from the other… pic.twitter.com/O5nJUmbx6S
BREAKING: British Medical Journal Reports Record Excess Deaths After COVID Vaccine
RIGGED DEATH SENTENCE: If Democrats can get Trump in a Jail Cell, He will Surely be ‘Suicided’ During Some Grid-Down Scenario, with No Videos or Witnesses
It’s surprising that the Democrats and their judge friend in New York did not blame the Russians for helping Trump cover up payments to the raunchy Stormy Daniels. It seems now that the Democrats, led by George Soros and Obama, must find a way to “rig” the Supreme Court of New York to deny Trump’s appeal of the disheartening verdict of “guilty” on a few dozen counts of the crime of … well … something about book-keeping errors. Realize right now that George Soros, the billionaire King of Funded Mayhem, FUNDED and INSTALLED Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, (along with 70 other D.A.’s across the U.S.) who just prosecuted and persecuted Trump, despite having no jurisdiction, with the ramped-up weaponization of the Left’s Justice Department. The radical Left Judge Juan Merchan will sentence Trump on July 11, most likely to at least 10 years in prison, where he would likely then be “suicided” Jeffrey Epstein style.
“Orange Man Bad” Donald J. Trump can still run and serve as President of the United States
What you might not know is that Trump can still RUN and SERVE as president, while the appeals process for the latest witch hunt on Trump takes a few years. It’s just the latest in a long line of staged attacks on Trump’s character, from the Russian-collusion hoax, to the made up, sexed-up dossier, to the Ukraine scandal, to the 2020 election denial, to the completely staged and Soros-funded go-straight-to-jail for accounting errors scandal that came to a head this week.
Remember back in May of 1998, President Bill “I did not have sexual relations with that woman” Clinton PAID Paula Jones nearly a million dollars to keep her mouth shut, and nobody on the Left called THAT a felony, nor did Bill “Cigar Boy” Clinton face prosecution or arrest for the hush-money payments.
The wicked son of George Soros, Alex, posted on social media that “Democrats should refer to Trump as a convicted felon at every opportunity.” Don’t you know that this was the entire goal from the beginning, knowing they probably will not be able to get Trump into a prison cell, unless they can rig appellate and Supreme Courts as well.
“Repetition is the key to a successful message and we want people to wrestle with the notion of hiring a convicted felon for the most important job in the country!” Alex “Son of Satan” Soros wrote, like they’re selling America some medicated, farm-raised GMO chicken (Biden) and are trying to bad mouth the wild-caught fish (Trump).
Here’s what Trump’s legal team can do next to keep him out of the New York gulags
After the Trump-hating judge sentences Orange Man to 20 years in prison for being bad, Trump’s legal team can file a direct appeal to the First Judicial Department of New York’s Appellate Division within 30 days, citing all the major issues they have with prejudiced trial testimony, the judge restricting Trump from using any evidencehis team had for defense (that’s enough to throw out the whole thing right there), and with the judge’s radical multiple-choice-style instructions where he told the jury to choose any offense they wanted (just like choosing a happy meal from a fast food menu) to help put Trump away.
Also remember — no crime has been committed, Trump has NO record for any crimes, and these wrong-doings were all nonviolent. If anything, he should be released on his own recognizance, or get cash bail option. It’s not like he’s a flight risk or anything, folks, he’s running for President and will most likely legitimately win by landslide, or so it is showing in all the big polls.
Meanwhile, the first layer of appeal should take about one year. Even if that level is unsuccessful, Trump still has the opportunity to file a leave application with the New York Court of Appeals, and if granted would get an appeal with New York’s highest court.
At that point Trump’s team would file a briefing that reads for Trump, “I was denied my constitutional rights under both the New York Constitution and the U.S. Constitution,” or that they simply did not follow criminal procedure. All that could take another whole year, and by then, we’re halfway into Trump’s second term as POTUS. By then, surely Trump can take down the real criminals – the Communists who have seized Washington DC, the U.S. military, Big Pharma, Big Media, and are trying to finish dismantling the Constitution once and for all.
Lastly, realize that the kangaroo court in Manhattan STILL has not said what crime Trump has committed, and still has NOT told anyone what the jury decided on. Are we still living in America? Keep your truth news in check by adding Preparedness.news to your favorites list and tuning in daily for updates on Trump and the Constitutionalists trying to save the Republic from sure doom.
BREAKING: British Medical Journal Reports Record Excess Deaths After COVID Vaccine
Nobel Prize Winner Kary Mullis Predicted PCR Test Fraud of HIV, COVID and Bird Flu
On his Thursday show Alex Jones played a video of Nobel Prize winner Kary Mullis discussing the fraud of the PCR test being used for false-positive results to shutdown the country again.
Don’t miss:
BREAKING: British Medical Journal Reports Record Excess Deaths After COVID Vaccine
Twelve EU Countries Lobby for Starting Accession Talks With Ukraine and Moldova
A dozen EU member states have submitted a joint letter to the EU Council’s current Belgian presidency, urging their remaining colleagues to kickstart Ukraine and Moldova’s EU membership talks by adopting their respective accession roadmaps before Hungary takes over the revolving presidency next month.
“We jointly call for the adoption of the negotiating frameworks for Ukraine and Moldova by the General Affairs Council in June at the latest,” the letter, dated June 5th and obtained by Euractive, reads, “in order to convene Intergovernmental Conferences with both countries by the end of June 2024.”
Although the European Council, the EU body comprising representatives of the 27 governments, already ruled that both countries have completed the required pre-conditions, and approved the beginning of the accession process back in December, the talks only commence once a candidate country has its negotiation framework—a specific roadmap of the reforms that are still required to become a full-fledged member—drafted and approved.
“In light of the results achieved and the ongoing reform efforts in both Ukraine and Moldova, which the Commission has previously reported on, we believe that now is the time to move forward,” the letter says, signed by ministers from Czechia, Sweden, Estonia, Finland, Portugal, Latvia, Poland, Lithuania, Germany, Slovenia, Romania, and Slovakia.
Although being one of the main supporters of Moldova’s EU membership, Hungary remains the biggest holdout on Ukraine. Budapest has a long-standing diplomatic dispute with Kyiv about ethnic minorities’ fundamental language rights that have been taken away by Ukrainian legislation in 2017 and 2019 and demands the problem be also addressed by Ukraine’s negotiating framework before it can approve it.
The signatories of the letter are expecting to revisit the issue during the Council’s upcoming general affairs meeting on Friday, June 7th, hoping to persuade Hungary to change its mind.
“Given the dire situation on the ground in Ukraine and the upcoming presidential elections and EU referendum in Moldova, [opening accession negotiations] would boost morale and further the work on reforms in these countries,” they added.
The twelve countries also argued that “to continue [a] credible enlargement process, the EU should provide tangible benefits for the populations of the respective countries” even before the conclusion of the accession process.
“This can be achieved by the gradual integration of Ukraine and Moldova into the European Union, through phasing into individual EU policies and programs before full membership in the EU,” the letter said.
BREAKING: British Medical Journal Reports Record Excess Deaths After COVID Vaccine
Germany has Begun Dumping Migrants in Poland
Aleksandra Fedorska who works for independent radio WNET and news outlet Biznes Alert has reported that migrants are being handed over to Polish border guards by German officers and are then transferred to hostels in bordering areas.
According to her, many of the migrants have told staff that they arrived in Germany from the Netherlands, Austria and other countries, rather than via Poland.
Bez butów, głodni i zdesperowani – taki jest stan ludzi wydalonych przez Niemców do Polski
— Aleksandra Fedorska (@a_fedorska) June 6, 2024
Osoby oddane polskiej strazy granicznej przez Niemcow sa przez straz graniczna rozwozone do roznych noclegowni na terenach wojewodztw przygranicznych. W tych noclegowniach wiele z tych… pic.twitter.com/kICbrt5wKF
The Polish journalist asked German federal police for data on illegal migrants on the border with Poland. According to the data produced, Germany has sent back 3,500 migrants out of the 5,600 people who are alleged to have crossed from Poland into Germany illegally.
“From Jan. 1 to April 30, 2024, the federal police registered a total of 5,621 people who illegally crossed the Polish-German border. Of these, 3,578 people were returned to Poland,” wrote Fedorska on her account on X.
The EU migration pact, which will come into force in 2026, makes a provision for member states to choose whether to receive relocated illegal migrants or pay €20,000 for every migrant they refuse.
Migration is a key issue for voters in three German eastern states this autumn. Germany makes no secret of its hope that the migration pact will enable it to reduce the number of migrants on its territory.
BREAKING: British Medical Journal Reports Record Excess Deaths After COVID Vaccine
Christian Foster Couples Sue Vermont for Revoking Their Licenses Because They Oppose Homosexual Ideology
(LifeSiteNews) — A pair of Christian foster couples is suing the Vermont Department for Children & Families (DCF) for allegedly blocking them from taking on additional foster children due to their Christian views on gender and sexuality.
The Daily Signal reports, based on interviews with both families as well as the lawsuit itself, that Brian and Kaitlyn Wuoti and Michael and Rebecca Gantt began fostering in 2014 and 2016, respectively, with the Wuotis adopting two brothers and the Gantts taking in three children. Brian Wuoti and Michael Gantt are both Christian pastors, as well.
Seeking to renew their license in 2022, the Wuotis were initially hailed by a caseworker who said she “probably could not hand pick a more wonderful foster family,” but mention of their Christian faith and “that they could not say or do anything that went against faith-informed views about human sexuality” prompted their license to be revoked, according to the lawsuit.
The Gantts, meanwhile, were asked to take in a baby who was about to be born to a homeless drug addict, but before the emergency placement was settled they received a notice that foster parents had to adhere to the state’s ideas on gender ideology “even if the foster parents hold divergent personal opinions or beliefs.” Responding that they would “unconditionally love and support any children placed with them, but they would not forsake their religious beliefs that people should value their God-given bodies,” the Gantts were met with rejection of the emergency placement and revocation of their license.
According to state licensing rules, “all foster parents are prohibited from engaging in any form” of so-called “discrimination” against foster children based on “sexual orientation” and “gender identity.” They must specifically “support children in wearing” any clothing affirming a presumed racial, cultural, tribal, or religious identity or “gender identity.”
The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Vermont, Windham Division, accuses DCF of forcing an “ideological position at the expense of children,” despite state officials’ own acknowledgment of a “desperate need for emergency foster homes.” As of last May, Vermont was estimated to have 1,060 children in state custody but only 900 licensed foster families.
“It requires parents to speak the State’s controversial views, while restricting parents’ ability to politely share their commonsense beliefs to any child in any context – categorically excluding disfavored viewpoints from the foster-parent pool entirely,” the suit contends. “Vermont’s regulations also target particular religious views for unequal treatment through an exemption-riddled system of individualized assessments.”
“We were surprised, because they are typically always trying to match children with families as best they can, and so we assumed maybe they would say, ‘Ok, maybe we won’t place an LGBT[-identifying] child with this family,’” Brian Wuoti told the Signal.
“We were offered to be reeducated and given the choice that they could either revoke our foster license or we could take some education materials, and they could give us up to a year to change our faith,” Michael Gantt said. “And I said, ‘No, we are not going to change our faith in the next year; absolutely not.’”
A substantial amount of social science literature supports the truth that children are properly served by homes with both a mother and a father, as each sex tends to bring unique strengths and emphases to parenting, which complement one another; and gives children a positive role model of their own sex as well as helping them understand and relate to the opposite sex. By contrast, a homosexual male “couple” would by definition lack a mother, and lesbians would be unable to provide a father.
Similarly, a significant body of evidence finds that “affirming” gender confusion carries serious harms, especially when done with impressionable children who lack the mental development, emotional maturity, and life experience to consider the long-term ramifications of the decisions being pushed on them. Studies find that more than 80% of children suffering gender dysphoria outgrow it on their own by late adolescence, whereas reinforcing dysphoria fails to resolve and even exacerbatesmental strife by perpetuating delusion and neglecting the actual root causes.
Yet in states such as Vermont, Washington, and Arizona, officials have enacted rules that threaten to put religious agencies out of business if they do not fully embrace pro-LGBT dictates despite not only the potential harm to children but shortages in available foster homes. Nationally, the Biden administration has proposed requiring adoption and foster agencies to ensure that children who “identify” as LGBT are placed in homes that “facilitate the child’s access to age-appropriate resources, services, and activities that support” LGBT activists’ conception of “health and well-being.”
BREAKING: British Medical Journal Reports Record Excess Deaths After COVID Vaccine