News

Slower US Mint Sales Are Keeping Coin Premiums Low

Slower US Mint Sales Are Keeping Coin Premiums Low

adminMar 1, 20243 min read
“Consequently, revenue for American Gold Eagles decreased by 17% to $1.9651 billion, while revenue for American Gold Buffalo coins fell by 15.3% to $738.1 million.”

Even as central banks buy more gold than ever, coin premiums have been driven lower throughout the retail precious metals market. One of the big factors: is disappointing sales from the US Mint.

In addition to keeping sales profitable, the markup on physical gold and silver coins helps cover costs like administration, storage, and transportation. The US Mint is a bureau of the US Department of the Treasury, and in addition to handling gold movements to central banks and fulfilling other duties, it’s a major producer and seller of physical bullion. Its customers are a handful of authorized gold and silver dealers, who then sell the products to retail investors.

The US Mint’s market share is significant enough that when sales there are low (or high) enough, it affects the mark-up rates across the wider bullion market. That’s what we’re seeing now, even as gold shows healthy price action and looks poised to go even higher in the face of global war and weak fiat currencies:

Gold vs USD, 5-Day Chart

Slower US Mint Sales Are Keeping Coin Premiums Low

Overall in the 2023 fiscal year, revenue at the US Mint dropped almost 13% despite sales volume increasing 24.5% compared to 2022. The sales increase was driven by the popularity of American Silver Eagles, which wasn’t enough to offset the sharp decline in sales for other bullion products. As CoinNews’s Mike Unser reports:

“Demand for U.S. Mint gold bullion coins saw a significant decline compared to the prior year, with sales of American Gold Eagles dropping by 20.7% to 988,000 ounces and sales of American Gold Buffalos decreasing by 19.2% to 375,000 ounces.”

These are some of the most popular gold coins for bullion investors to stack. With lower sales of these mainstay coins, the US Mint saw a significant subsequent drop in income.

“Consequently, revenue for American Gold Eagles decreased by 17% to $1.9651 billion, while revenue for American Gold Buffalo coins fell by 15.3% to $738.1 million.”

The past two weeks alone have seen major sales declines compared to the US Mint’s average. According to CoinNews.net’s sales data from the US Mint, silver and gold numismatics took one of the biggest hits from losses. For example, 2024 Commemorative Coins saw a 10% drop in sales of the 2024-S Proof Harriet Tubman Half Dollar, which was one of the most significant declines.

Meanwhile, in Asia, premiums are mixed. They’ve notched up higher in China as the Lunar New Year comes to a close, and bullion sales can resume. But in India, it’s the end of the famously gold-soaked wedding season, which always leads to a relative drop in retail demand since gold is a major cultural component in Indian nuptials. With less demand because of this, premiums in India are down compared to previous weeks.

If the downward sales trend continues at the US Mint, it makes for an even better time to buy gold. Bullish momentum combined with lower premiums gives you more bang for your fiat buck. But if the Mint sees a resurgence, the price of gold could go higher — and this time, spot premiums might go up with it.


BREAKING: Dan Bongino Breaks Spy Story Of The Century, Alex Jones Sends Emergency Message
Germany: Teen Girls Stabbed, Robbed by ‘North African’ Suspect

Germany: Teen Girls Stabbed, Robbed by ‘North African’ Suspect

adminMar 1, 20242 min read

Germany: Teen Girls Stabbed, Robbed by ‘North African’ Suspect

17-year-olds slashed in remote area of German town during shocking attack

Two teenage girls were brutally attacked and robbed by a ‘North African’ suspect who stabbed them repeatedly during a robbery in Germany this week, according to reports.

The shocking attack unfolded just before 3 a.m. in Erkrath, a town in the state of North Rhine-Westphalia.

The victims, both 17 years old, were sitting together in a covered shelter on a dirt road when a Mercedes coupe with at least two males inside pulled up in front of them, according to Welt.

One of the men exited the vehicle brandishing a knife and demanded the girls hand over their valuables.

When they refused, he began slashing them and took one of the victims’ handbags before fleeing the scene in the Mercedes.

The girls managed to call police and emergency responders arrived a short time later.

Both victims were rushed to hospital, one in critical condition.

A manhunt was immediately launched and a helicopter scoured the region but the suspects could not be located.

“The knife man is said to be between 15 and 22 years old and around 1.75 meters tall. He wore a ‘pot cut’ with dark curls, no beard and was said to have looked North African,” BILD reports.

“According to police, he has full lips, a wide nose and spoke German. His clothes: black sweatpants and a black striped quilted jacket.”

It is unclear if any suspects have been apprehended at the time of this writing.

InfoWars frequently covers violent crimes committed by foreign suspects in Germany.


Alex Jones responds to Dan Bongino’s ‘bump’ list revelations, and invites him on InfoWars to have an open discussion.

Dan Lyman on X | Gab


Biden Regime Wages War on First Amendment, Comes After Conservative Journalists

Biden Regime Wages War on First Amendment, Comes After Conservative Journalists

adminMar 1, 20244 min read

Biden Regime Wages War on First Amendment, Comes After Conservative Journalists

Biden administration brazenly persecuting journalists making his corrupt regime look bad.

Conservative journalists are finding themselves the targets of oppressive lawfare tactics evidently for exposing Joe Biden’s corruption.

On Friday, footage showed Blaze journalist Steve Baker being made to do a perp walk as he was taken into custody to face charges over his reporting involving the Jan. 6 debacle.

Blaze Media Investigative Journalist @TPC4USA has now been taken into FBI custody for his J6 reporting

Watch: pic.twitter.com/OF9WVh26ER

— TheBlaze (@theblaze) March 1, 2024

Baker, who attended J6 as an independent journalist, has been reporting on the anomalies surrounding the government’s official narrative of what happened that day, including dispelling false narratives spewed by Capitol Police regarding the timeline of events and the mysterious pipe bomb found at the DNC.

?BREAKING?- This time, it’s really happening.

Unlike the two previous threats my attorneys received from @FBI / @thejusticedept (Nov. 21 and Dec. 23), my self-surrender for alleged J6 crimes is set for this Friday morning in Dallas, TX. There is now a signed arrest warrant.⬇️

— Steve Baker – TPC (@TPC4USA) February 28, 2024

On Friday, after reporting to a federal courthouse in handcuffs, Baker was charged with:

  • Knowingly entering or remaining in any restricted building or grounds without lawful authority
  • Disorderly and disruptive conduct in a restricted building or grounds
  • Disorderly conduct in a capitol building
  • Parading, demonstrating, or picketing in a capitol building

The arrest was roundly criticized on social media, with many noting the Biden regime’s so-called preservation of democracy appears to include jailing opposition journalists.

I guess now they’re arresting journalists to preserve democracy or something??? https://t.co/z2YTEOlKiz

— Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) March 1, 2024

This is a very dark day for this country. Hard to imagine the DOJ is so blatant about prosecuting a journalist simply for doing his job. Every journalist in this country should be outraged. The message sent is chilling. Journalists will self-censor as a result. This is meant to… https://t.co/Vadvd330vy

— Lara Logan (@laralogan) March 1, 2024

They are jailing journalists.

I am begging those with any dignity on the Left to set aside their bias and speak up. You will not be spared from this snare. https://t.co/ZsOdsS7BcX

— Ashley St. Clair (@stclairashley) March 1, 2024

Fortunately, Baker was released shortly after appearing in court.

???

Steve Baker @TPC4USA has been released from the federal courthouse pic.twitter.com/QXBeIMuCvm

— TheBlaze (@theblaze) March 1, 2024

Likewise, recently ousted CBS News investigative journalist Catherine Herridge, who was fired by her network last month, was held in contempt in federal court on Thursday after refusing to reveal her sources pertaining to reports she wrote for Fox News in 2017 alleging Chinese-American scientist Yanping Chen was under FBI investigation.

CBS seized her files so they could give them to the corrupt FBI and its surveillance state cronies to help them hunt down and punish her sources. The American Stasi simply will not allow any criticism of its tyranny. https://t.co/OqQGLPh0gE

— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) February 22, 2024

Of course, safeguarding sources in order to pursue news stories that benefit the public interest is part and parcel of the press freedom protections enshrined in the First Amendment.

As noted by former Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy, freedom of the press is ironically under attack by the very administration which claims to champion democracy.

Blaze Media investigative journalist Steve Baker being taken into FBI custody for his J6 reporting.

Ex-Fox News reporter Catherine Herridge being held in contempt yesterday for refusing to reveal her sources about a Chinese-American scientist investigated by the FBI but never… https://t.co/nlQV589S14

— Vivek Ramaswamy (@VivekGRamaswamy) March 1, 2024

“Those who pontificate about ‘threats to our democracy’ should take a hard look at the threats to freedom of the press,” Ramaswamy stated on X Friday.



Liberals Freak Out Over TX General In Military Uniform Standing Behind Trump During Border Visit

Liberals Freak Out Over TX General In Military Uniform Standing Behind Trump During Border Visit

adminMar 1, 20246 min read

Liberals Freak Out Over TX General In Military Uniform Standing Behind Trump During Border Visit

Did the person violate military rule or did the left jump the gun?

During Donald Trump’s visit to the U.S. southern border this week, a man in full military uniform stood behind the Republican presidential candidate while he delivered a speech.

Trump Derangement Syndrome-suffering leftists on social media immediately assumed the man was a member of the U.S. Air Force and shunned him for violating code.

Newsweek even posted an article, titled, “Military Presence Behind Donald Trump During Border Speech Raises Alarm.”

One X user tagged the U.S. Air Force account and asked why its general was dressed in uniform at a Trump campaign event, writing, “Last I checked LARPing for a candidate in uniform is not permitted. Figure a General would know that.”

Dear @usairforce,
What’s your General doing dressed in uniform at a Trump campaign event? Or did Donald find another Stolen Valor schmuck to play dress-up? Last I checked LARPing for a candidate in uniform is not permitted. Figure a General would know that. pic.twitter.com/06Ii8msu7B

— Sgt Joker (@TheSGTJoker) March 1, 2024

Former congressman and current CNN Senior Political Commentator Adam Kinzinger promoted the fake news.

Good question. Trump isn’t president so this is by definition a campaign event, and nobody in uniform can participate. https://t.co/XG8M6Tx0R1

— Adam Kinzinger (Slava Ukraini) ?????? (@AdamKinzinger) February 29, 2024

Several other accounts echoed the false narrative that an Air Force general stood behind Trump.

@DeptofDefense⁩ – Why is this person in uniform at a trump campaign event? pic.twitter.com/efnmm86cU4

— Pesky Jski – No kings welcome. ?️? (@PeskyJski) March 1, 2024

If you look behind Drumpf, it’s Major General Thomas Suelzer, standing behind Trump at a campaign event. WTF @DeptofDefense? Why is a DoD employee standing with Trump, in uniform, at a campaign event? It’s illegal via the Hatch Act and DoD guidelines! Do we not follow laws now? https://t.co/NxhODeDWtA

— WTF Seriously ?? ?? (@stopbeingaderp) March 1, 2024

Hmmmmm….
Isn’t Major General Thomas Suelzer in violation of the “Hatch Act” for wearing his uniform at the Trump Campaign visit to the border? pic.twitter.com/PGPGSoGYbc

— Rylie Roulette (@RylieRoulette) March 1, 2024

It was later revealed the man in uniform behind Trump is Major General Thomas Suelzer, who is currently serving as the Adjutant General for the State of Texas under Republican Governor Greg Abbott.

Suelzer’s position of authority over Texas Military Forces is second only to Abbott, and the general was at the Trump event on the governor’s behalf. 

Even after learning Suelzer’s identity, the rabid anti-Trumpers continued attacking him for daring to stand behind the man trying to stop the border invasion.

Former Republican John Jackson, who left the U.S. to fight in defense of Ukraine, wrote, “This is a terrible failure of leadership by Maj. Gen. Thomas Suelzer. It is literally Military 101 that you don’t act in a political capacity while in uniform. This man is utterly incompetent at best. Everyone knew this event was a political stunt. Nodding at racist trash.”

This is a terrible failure of leadership by Maj. Gen. Thomas Suelzer. It is literally Military 101 that you don’t act in a political capacity while in uniform. This man is utterly incompetent at best. Everyone knew this event was a political stunt. Nodding at racist trash. https://t.co/PgDGXuUsvH

— John Jackson (@hissgoescobra) March 1, 2024

Not the best look for Maj. Gen. Thomas Suelzer on Trump’s shoulder, nodding along in uniform while a political candidate goes on a racist tirade at a lectern displaying his campaign’s fundraising number https://t.co/y5ZNKeUdOB

— Joe Perticone (@JoePerticone) March 1, 2024

Major Gen Thomas Suelzer, Texas Adjutant General, stood by Donald Trump at Eagle Pass, TX tour of the border. Suelzer blurred his uniform name tag but not his Air Force tag & rank. DoD Directive 1344.10 bans use of uniform for political or campaign events. Is this proper? pic.twitter.com/ajQMYsLdpv

— La Prensa San Diego – LaPrensa.org (@LaPrensaSD) March 1, 2024

1. Maj. General Suelzer appears to be ignoring the rules regarding appearing in uniform at political events.
2. He’s standing with a guy who thinks he’s a sucker and a loser. pic.twitter.com/hLGfIbeFYo

— Jody Dean (dfwjodydean.bsky.social) (@DFWJodyDean) March 1, 2024

Law enforcement and soldiers that pose with this criminal defendant for his social media page should be fired. pic.twitter.com/TrGOUaN0tt

— Molly Ploofkins™ (@Mollyploofkins) March 1, 2024

The Texas Major General didn’t just stand with Trump, he also spoke to the nation, telling Americans the state’s National Guard is working to stop the invasion and telling would-be illegals, “If you are around the world contemplating coming to do an illegal entry into the United States of America, YOU NEED TO THINK TWICE about that. Go somewhere else or don’t even begin your journey.”

If you are… contemplating coming to do an illegal entry into the United States of America, YOU NEED TO THINK TWICE about that.” – Maj. Gen. Thomas M. Suelzer

Join us live for President Trump’s visit to the border in Eagle Pass, Texas! https://t.co/Ul96gHsFCu pic.twitter.com/H9sHYrYqfz

— Real America’s Voice (RAV) (@RealAmVoice) February 29, 2024

Several informed X users detailed why it was fine for Suelzer to be at the press conference, with military veteran Mark Hertling pointing out the general left Air Force active duty in 2007 and is now under the command of the Texas governor.

For those who may not understand, MajGen Suelzer is The Adjutant General of the Texas Guard. USAFA Class of 90 & a C5 pilot, he left active duty in 2007, joined the Air Nat’l Guard. TAGs are political appointees & get their ranks/positions from their Governor. Abbott’s his boss. https://t.co/GUiUH7VGiJ

— Mark Hertling (@MarkHertling) March 1, 2024

Alex Jones Was Right

Alex Jones Was Right

adminMar 1, 202413 min read

Alex Jones Was Right

It’s been over eight years since Alex Jones had his infamous “gay frogs rant” live on air. A meme was born—and a very serious issue all but died. And that’s a real shame, because Alex Jones was right.

Few men in America have been so spectacularly vilified and misunderstood as Alex Emerick Jones, the founder of Infowars. In the febrile atmosphere of post-2016 America, it’s almost impossible to find anyone who doesn’t have a strong opinion about him. Depending on which side of the fence you’re sat on, Alex Jones is either a deranged conspiracy-obsessed lunatic who should be made to pay every last cent of the $965 million in damages he owes the families of the Sandy Hook victims he slandered; or he’s a brave patriot, a charismatic warrior for truth who is being destroyed by America’s globalist elite for revealing their schemes and helping get Donald Trump, their mortal enemy, elected as president. There isn’t really a middle position.

This makes it difficult, if not impossible, to talk about Alex Jones and the truth of what he says with any kind of equanimity. And that’s a real shame, because Alex Jones is right and has been right about a lot of things—important things. In many cases, he was right long before anybody else in the public eye, and he kept being right even though he was ridiculed for what he was saying. There’s no better example of this than his infamous “gay frogs rant.”

It’s been over eight years since Jones bellowed, live on air, “I don’t like ‘em putting chemicals in the water that turn the frickin’ frogs gay,” before smashing his fist into the desk and sending his papers flying. Just like that, a meme was born. Critics in the mainstream media by turns mocked and condemned Jones for spreading yet another “right-wing conspiracy theory.” #gayfrogs trended on Twitter, with a video excerpt of the rant garnering over half a million views and thousands of comments. The rant was even turned into an indie song.

A meme was born—and a very serious issue all but died. Of course, Jones did little to help his own credibility in the matter by dressing up as a gay frog live on air, replete with a pink tutu and a bottle labelled “atrazine,” from which he sucked campily. In an instant, it became all but impossible to talk seriously about the havoc being wreaked on living organisms, whether they be frogs or humans, by harmful chemicals in the environment—the food, the water, the air—and especially a class of chemicals known as “endocrine disruptors.”

Many endocrine disruptors mimic the “female” hormone estrogen, upsetting the body’s sensitive endocrine (i.e., hormonal) balance and triggering a cascade of negative effects ranging from reproductive issues and birth defects to obesity, diabetes, and cancer. Our exposure to these chemicals has grown enormously with the progress of the industrial age. While a great number of endocrine disruptors are associated with plastics and their manufacture, they are also widely present among herbicides, pesticides, medicines, food additives, flame retardants, and a whole host of other products, without which modern life would indeed be very different. The simple, scary truth is that it’s now impossible to avoid these chemicals at any stage of life, from gestation to working in the remotest parts of the planet. Three thousand tons of microplastics are estimated to fall over Switzerland each year in snow.

Although he didn’t mention it directly during his rant, Jones was pointing towards a study that had received considerable attention from the scientific community and the popular press, including National Geographic and Science magazines, five years earlier, in 2010. The study showed that exposure to the popular herbicide atrazine at levels typical of US waterways was enough to castrate male frogs and even make them change their gender. Researchers exposed African clawed frog larvae to atrazine in a laboratory and found that fully 10% of the larvae became “atrazine-induced females” that developed into “completely feminized” adults. These transgender frogs would then go on to mate with males from the control group that had not been exposed to atrazine, and they were even able to produce viable eggs. Atrazine does this because it causes the “male” hormone testosterone to be converted into estrogen.

Could endocrine disruptors make humans change their gender too, just like the African clawed frogs? That was obviously what Jones was suggesting, and it’s a claim he’s repeated many times in the years since. This is a much fuller and, of course, more controversial claim than saying endocrine disruptors affect fertility and sexual development, which is far beyond the realms of dispute at this point.

On the face of things, that stronger claim is totally plausible. Our biology isn’t so different from a frog’s, and a rough correlation between exposure to harmful chemicals and increasing rates of transgenderism could be plotted without much difficulty. Correlation isn’t causation, as we well know, but there’s an enormous body of evidence to substantiate both the crucial role of hormones in sexual development and the devastating negative effects of endocrine disruptors. Together, they make a compelling case that transgenderism could be one extreme result of exposure to endocrine disruptors at crucial points in the human lifecycle.

With transgenderism, we are clearly dealing with a complicated issue that goes beyond reduced testosterone levels or sperm counts to touch the deepest aspect of a person’s being: their sense of self, of who and what they are or should be. Many people seem to doubt the ability of hormones to affect a person this deeply, but the truth is, hormones make us who and what we are, and that includes our self-perception. Any woman who has taken a contraceptive pill will know this, and so too, in all probability, will her boyfriend or husband. All of a sudden, you’re no longer Kate but Kate-who’s-trapped-somewhere-in-the-luteal-phase-of-her-cycle-all-month, and she’s a very different person altogether. Of course, this is why hormone therapy is an integral part of the process of medical transition from one gender to the other: estrogen therapy for male-to-female and testosterone therapy for female-to-male. And it’s why, when access to prescribed hormones is scarce, male transgenders have been known to boil plastic bags and drink the resulting plasticiser-rich liquid as a substitute for estrogen.

The problem, however, is that there simply aren’t any studies that directly examine the link between exposure to harmful chemicals and transgenderism. It’s not hard to imagine why that might be the case. I hardly need to tell you how controversial the topic of transgenderism has become. While there have been a handful of studies that attempt to explain the growth of transgenderism as something other than an organic phenomenon—and by that, I mean something other than a stable population finally being able to reveal themselves as society becomes more tolerant and inclusive—these few studies have focused on social factors, like children having friends who claim to be transgender, or psychological factors like having one or more mental illnesses. Nobody seems to be willing to make the chemical connection.

Until now, that is. Now there’s a study that directly links exposure to endocrine disruptors to transgenderism. The study is published in the Journal of Xenobiotics, and it considers the effects of exposure to the chemical diethylstilbestrol (DES) on the rate of transgenderism among French boys. The study’s authors discovered that boys exposed to DES in utero were perhaps as much as 100 times more likely to become male-to-female transgender than the highest reported background rate across Europe. Reliable figures for the number of transgender people as a percentage of the population vary wildly, so the actual increase in risk due to exposure to DES could be even higher.

Although DES has been banned in the US since the year 2000, it was used for decades to treat a wide variety of women’s ailments, from vaginitis to menopause, and, most importantly, it was given during pregnancy to a large number of women with a history of miscarriage to reduce the risk of further complications. It’s estimated that between 1938 and 1971, four million pregnant women were given DES in the US alone. DES was also given to livestock to fatten them for market, and it was even used as a form of chemical castration to “treat” homosexuality, its most famous victim in that regard being the cryptographer Alan Turing, who was forced to take DES not long before his death in suspicious circumstances.

The first comprehensive evidence of the drug’s harmful effects came in the early 1970s, when it was shown to cause rare forms of vaginal tumors in girls exposed to the drug in utero. In 1971, the FDA withdrew approval for its use as a treatment for pregnant women. DES has now been widely linked to reproductive abnormalities in both sexes, ranging from epidydimal cysts, undescended testicles (cryptorchidism), and micropenises in boys to ectopic pregnancies, miscarriages, premature births, and various forms of cancer in girls, including breast cancer and the rare cancers mentioned earlier. DES exposure is also linked to psychological disorders, including schizophrenia, bipolarism, eating disorders, and suicidal behavior. Exposure is believed to have multigenerational and transgenerational effects, meaning that the effects of exposure ramify down the generations even when only a single generation has been exposed. We’re now discovering that many harmful chemicals have these kinds of effects; the weedkiller glyphosate, for example, can cause the great-grandchildren of rats exposed to it to become obese.

The new French study looks at a cohort of 1200 mothers who were given DES while pregnant and their nearly 2000 offspring. Importantly, the study includes children these mothers gave birth to before they were exposed to DES. This allows the establishment of a comparable rate between sons born with and without exposure to the drug.

The results show that none of the 148 boys who avoided exposure ended up becoming transgender, whereas four out of 253 boys exposed to DES in the womb ended up becoming transgender.

As the study’s authors note, exposure to DES increased the risk of becoming transgender enormously.

If we consider the highest prevalence of transgender women reported in the literature (1/17,000), the prevalence we observed in our study (1.58%) is 10- to 100-fold higher. Moreover, the prevalence of female transgender identity was 0% among the 148 elder non-exposed sons in the same informative families.

The study does have limitations, principally the size of the sample. As I said earlier, millions of women in the US alone were exposed to DES while pregnant, so there’s potential for a much larger-scale investigation to confirm the results of this study. And, of course, there are many, many other endocrine-disrupting chemicals whose relationship with transgenderism—in both sexes—could and should be investigated. This is just the start.

Even so, this new French study represents a stunning vindication of Alex Jones’s basic claim about harmful chemicals and gender trouble. No longer do we need to make inferences from studies of African clawed frogs or any other animal that isn’t a human, nor do we need to lay out a prima facie case on the basis of other data about the human effects of endocrine disruptors and what we know about the role of hormones in human sexual development.

We now have direct evidence that exposure to a potent estrogenic chemical at a crucial stage of early development appears to have lifelong effects on a person’s sense of gender identity, that it can lead them to consider themselves transgender, and that it might even lead them to seek gender-reassignment surgery. We now have a clear, non-political mandate to investigate the matter urgently with the rigor only genuine science, at its best, can provide.

To do so is right. It’s compassionate. That’s one thing that also stands out from this new French study. Among the dry scientific data and discussion of methodology are four moving personal testimonies: biographies of the four boys and then men who ended up becoming transgender after being exposed to DES. Here’s one of them.

Currently a composer (guitar and vocals), S. was born in 1969 after in utero exposure to DES. At birth, S. had male genitalia with unilateral cryptorchidism. S. started to question the assigned male gender at the age of 4 years: “I remember very clearly that when I was 3–4 years old, one day I went with my mother to a hairdressing salon and having looked at all the ladies, I thought: ‘When I grow up this is what I will do: I will be a woman.’”

During adolescence, S. felt he was a woman and had severe psychological disorders, particularly depression and suicidal ideation… As an adult, S. married and had two children. These two girls had prolactinoma, and one has Asperger’s syndrome, androgyny and ovarian cysts. S. began the transition with male to female gender reassignment surgery, in Brighton, United Kingdom (UK), in November 2015. Since then, S. has been receiving GAHT and is followed by the doctor who managed the transition. According to the UK Gender Recognition Act, S. could change their sex recorded on their birth certificate (male to female) and now, she lives in Scotland. Her elder sister, also exposed to DES in utero after her mother’s miscarriage, died due to vaginal adenocarcinoma during adolescence.

It’s easy to forget, amid all the rancor, the back-and-forth accusations, and even the threats and physical violence that are now all-too common in the transgenderism debate, that there are real people at the heart of this issue—people who are suffering terribly. For every headline-grabbing male swimmer or fighter exercising their unfair, irreversible physical advantages in the realm of women’s sports and for every former special-forces soldier indulging his autogynephilic fantasies, there are likely to be far more people like S., whose lives, through no fault of their own, have been blighted by the toxic legacy of medical science and modern industry and who have been forced to the extremes of human experience to deal with their sense of belonging in the wrong body. For the sake of them and to spare others their fate, we need to know the truth, however painful it may be. And the truth, it seems, is that Alex Jones was right.



VIDEO: Joe Rogan Says Only Jesus Can Save The Planet

VIDEO: Joe Rogan Says Only Jesus Can Save The Planet

adminMar 1, 20241 min read

VIDEO: Joe Rogan Says Only Jesus Can Save The Planet

Alex Jones responds with a powerful breakdown of the battle between Good & evil!

Podcast host and comedian Joe Rogan appears to be acknowledging the power of God and recognizing sides must be taken in the spiritual battle between Good and evil – Alex Jones responds.

Don’t miss:

Alex Jones Reveals Spiritual Awakening Of Major Players Against The NWO