VIDEO: It Takes Real Courage for Dennis Quaid to Endorse Donald Trump
On Wednesday Alex Jones covered statements made by actor Dennis Quaid regarding coming out in favor of Donald Trump.
Don’t miss:
BREAKING: Disease X Is Here, Warns Dr. Peter McCullough
Scientists Develop mRNA Bird Flu Vaccine
An experimental mRNA vaccine may help fight the H5N1 bird flu outbreaks that are now spreading in wild birds, poultry and cows in the United States according to researchers. They calim that the vaccine has […]
The post Scientists Develop mRNA Bird Flu Vaccine appeared first on The People’s Voice.
Paralyzed Then Drowned: Veteran Exposes the Terrifying Method Used to Euthanize People in Canada
(LifeSiteNews) — While marketed and pushed under the guise of painless compassion, the method used to kill Canadians under the nation’s Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) euthanasia program may actually be akin to waterboarding.
During a May 6 episode of renowned anti-woke Canadian psychologist Jordan Peterson’s podcast, Sheren, a combat veteran and artillery gunner in the Canadian military, revealed that the drugs used in MAiD essentially waterboard a person to death.
WATCH: This is how #MAiD in #Canada actually works pic.twitter.com/OrnJeBTNlO
— LifeSiteNews (@LifeSite) May 28, 2024
“What I found out yesterday that really bothered me was the mechanism of the actual procedure,” she began, comparing Canada’s current practices to those in Nazis Germany. “The reason people in Canada who are given MAiD seem peaceful is because they’re given a paralytic first so they’re completely paralyzed, then this drug is administered as one of the four and they start drowning to death.”
Sheren cited the testimony of Canadian Dr. Joel Zivot, Associate Professor of Anesthesiology and Surgery Emory at the University School of Medicine Atlanta, Georgia.
In February 2021, Zivot refuted the Canadian government’s claim that Midazolam, a drug used in MAiD, provided “relief from anxiety” and “comfort to the patient.”
Instead, he testified to the Canadian Senate that “muscle relaxants when used in MAID will produce death by suffocation.”
“The MAID protocol very likely causes lung congestion in a similar fashion to that which has been shown in over 200 cases of lethal injection in the U.S.,” he said, referencing a Freedom of Information Act request containing the autopsies of around 300 Americans who were executed using the same drugs as Canada’s MAiD program.
According to Sheren, “85% of those bodies showed a two times level increase of water in the lungs. What was happening is when this drug is pushed, it causes a drowning and it’s stated as akin to dying by water boarding or drowning.”
In his testimony, Zivot explained that the muscle relaxant drugs given during MAiD “will produce an outwardly observed stillness as a consequence of muscle paralysis than has wrongly and repeatedly been described as a state of peacefulness.”
“The only way to refute the hypothesis that the MAiD protocol causes pulmonary fluid accumulation and death akin drowning is by obtaining Canadian data through autopsy studies on at least 200 individuals put to death by MAID,” he argued.
Sheren further revealed that Canadians who received MAiD could be internally drowning for some time while their bodies are completely paralyzed.
“Dying with Dignity says that this is a painless death,” she stated. “Well, if you take MAiD orally, it takes between 30 minutes to 24 hours.”
“24 hours of active drowning while you’re under a paralytic,” Sheren declared.
“That’s how dying with Dignity in the Canadian government has disguised MAiD, while they’re offering it to Canadian veterans instead of treatment, so they don’t have to pay for their pensions, so they don’t have to pay for their healthcare,” she lamented.
Sheren further revealed that the Canadian government has chosen to give their citizens a terrifying and sometimes lengthy death as a way to save on providing real healthcare.
“In 2021, they had a gross reduction in healthcare of $19.2 million,” she said. “When they did MAiD, they saved another (…) $22 million.”
“By the end of it all in that year the healthcare system, just from doing MAiD instead of actually giving people palliative of care, [saved] $86.9 million,” Sheren continued.
“We deserve better and so do our kids and so do our citizens. We don’t deserve this Canada,” she declared.
“I’ve seen this done to someone,” she continued. “You don’t wish that on anyone. It would have been easier it’s easier to put bricks around my feet and go jump in the ocean than it is to die by MAiD. That is a terrifying way to die.”
In Canada, MAiD does not yet apply to the mentally ill, as the Liberal government decided to delay the expansion of euthanasia to those suffering solely from such illnesses until 2027 following backlash from Canadians and prominent doctors.
In January, provincial health ministers went a step further than seeking a delay in the provision, asking for the measure to be “indefinitely” postponed. A request that has yet to be accepted.
The most recent reports show that MAiD is the sixth highest cause of death in Canada. However, it was not listed as such in Statistics Canada’s top 10 leading causes of death from 2019 to 2022. When asked why MAiD was left off the list, the agency explained that it records the illnesses that led Canadians to choose to end their lives via euthanasia, not the actual cause of death, as the primary cause of death.
According to Health Canada, in 2022, 13,241 Canadians died by MAiD lethal injections. This accounts for 4.1 percent of all deaths in the country for that year ,a 31.2 percent increase from 2021.
While the numbers for 2023 have yet to be released, all indications point to a situation even more grim than 2022.
Send an urgent message to Canadian legislators urging them to stop expanding assisted suicide
BREAKING: Disease X Is Here, Warns Dr. Peter McCullough
Von der Leyen Proposes ‘Brain Eating Vaccines’ for Minds and a ‘Shield’ for Democracy
One of the hallmarks of the European Union is that if something sounds too good to be true, it usually is. In fact, it often means the exact opposite.
Take, for instance, the idea that Ursula Von der Leyen, the European Commission president, is running for re-election when in reality she’s just publicly squabbling with a few other establishment hacks to be handpicked and confirmed by the establishment itself, not by popular vote. But that hasn’t stopped her from cosplaying as an actual democratic candidate. It’s not like she didn’t have the opportunity to actually be one rather than just play one, but when her German colleagues asked her to run for an elected EU seat in Germany to establish some democratic credibility, she reportedly declined the inconvenience.
But that hasn’t stopped her from posting “campaign” ads on social media, as though she’s actually trying to appeal to voters. In one such video, she promises that if she’s re-coronated, er, “re-elected,” she’ll defend Europe with a “Democracy Shield.” The whole idea, she says, is to “detect disinformation and malign interference… remove content, including [artificial intelligence] deepfakes, [and] to make our societies more resilient.” Nothing about defending Europe’s democracy from unelected bureaucrats wielding excessive power though, I guess?
Ever since billionaire tech entrepreneur, Elon Musk, took over Twitter, renamed the social media platform ‘X’, and publicly shamed all the Western government authorities that tried to exploit the platform directly for their own propaganda purposes, his “community notes” feature has allowed users to react directly and in real time to content, including deep fake videos, and has proven that the antidote to inaccuracy is more free and democratic speech, not less.
“Democracy,” in the case of this “Democracy Shield” is really just a euphemism for censorship. Because what does this “shield” really protect Europe from, that more free speech can’t achieve, other than inconvenient facts? Or from Queen Ursula and the rest of the European establishment having to defend their own ideological lunacy and explain to citizens why the narratives they peddle often don’t jibe with reality.
Read more Von der Leyen facing growing discontent in EU capitals – media
Apparently, they figure that democracy would be better off if everything and everyone that didn’t fit their top agenda narratives could just be whacked over the head and dragged off into the shadows by the online Gestapo serving von der Leyen’s online “Democracy Shield.”
But maybe characterizing the Democracy Shield as little more than a “propaganda shield” is unfair. After all, it’s not like the EU or Ursula actually say that they’re interested in doing propaganda. No, instead she says that she just wants to do a little “pre-bunking,” which totally doesn’t sound like propaganda at all.
Speaking at the Copenhagen Democracy Summit earlier this month, von der Leyen explained that “research has shown that pre-bunking is more successful than de-bunking. Pre-bunking is the opposite of de-bunking. In short, prevention is preferable to cure. Think of information manipulation as a virus. Instead of treating an infection once it has taken hold, that’s the de-bunking, it is better to vaccinate, so that our body is inoculated. Pre-bunking is the same approach.”
Yeah, folks, just think of free debate and discussion as a nasty virus that could get really messy. May provoke verbal diarrhea. Ugly stuff. Wouldn’t it just be better if the EU could inject its narratives like a vaccine straight into the minds of citizens to eliminate any risk of messy opposing views or information?
What if the pre-bunk narrative IS the disinformation, though? Of course that never happens, right? Everything that the EU and Western governments say is always the total and complete objective truth and anyone questioning it is some kind of foreign agent.
By the way, von der Leyen’s “societal resilience” here really just means compliance – that everyone piles into the clown car on command so these bozos can take everyone on a joyride down Dystopian Highway towards wherever fresh Hell their hidden special interests dictate at any given time.
Read more Fyodor Lukyanov: This is the question that could ultimately destroy EU-US unity
But perhaps Queen Ursula should be given the benefit of the doubt here, though. Maybe she really does just want to deploy her Democracy Shield against armies of annoying online bots and not on the political playing field to quash dissent?
“It’s not just fakes or fabricated content,” von der Leyen argued in announcing the Shield. “It’s also buying influence and causing chaos. We have seen far-right politicians and lead candidates from AfD in Germany in the pockets of Russia. They are selling their souls on Russian propaganda outlets and videos.”
Well, if she puts it that way… doubt benefit erased.
Want to smear a political opponent because they happen to enjoy free speech on a variety of platforms? Sounds like a job for Queen Ursula’s Democracy Shield, which, like NATO, is totally defensive and does not ever do offensive operations and actively snuff out opponents on the political landscape. The EU already tried to pick off entire media outlets that it didn’t like, censoring Russian platforms like RT and Sputnik at the supranational level and imposing that ban on all member states of the entire bloc in the absence of sovereign and democratic due process. The justification? That they were spreading “distortion of facts” that threatened the EU democratic order. Nothing better for credible journalism than governments arguing that they’re the ultimate arbiters of truthful information.
It turns out that blanket censorship didn’t quite knock everyone into line, so von der Leyen says in her ad that the Democracy Shield will “track down information manipulation and coordinate with national agencies.” Hunting down wrong-speakers on the informational landscape? Sounds super democratic. So does the idea of “national agencies”deciding what qualifies as news.
Is this authoritarian Democracy Shield going to require any independent oversight? Because von der Leyen, back when she was German defense minister under Chancellor Angela Merkel, wasn’t really into that kind of thing. Western press reports were rife with details of her underwhelming performance, with the Washington Post, for instance, citing a shortage of military equipment and promises to rectify the situation that were never fulfilled. They also said that the troops used broomsticks instead of machine guns for NATO exercises. Guess she had lots of those at her disposal.
We know from her stonewalling of the committee demanding to see her text messages with Pfizer brass over her vaccine deals that Queen Ursula really isn’t into transparency, either. Who needs actual democratic values though, when you have a Democracy Shield? Maybe we can see it deployed in real time in a sort of test. If it was truly doing its job of shielding democracy, it would mow down von der Leyen’s propaganda first, then just blow itself up.
This Man Warned You Of Brain Eating Vaccines Decades Ago!
‘Our Turn’: Why Does Europe’s Youth Turn to the Right?
Wherever you look, establishment parties are in panic mode throughout Europe. The centrist old parties may still be in charge but their appeal is waning day by day. Polls show that more radical outfits on both sides of the political spectrum are beneficiaries of this silent rebellion. In particular, the surge of national conservative parties seems more pronounced and, at the same time, much more worrying for the mainstream.
The haphazard efforts of the ruling class to keep the Right under control, in turn, only accelerate the ongoing right-wing surge. One important reason for this self-fulfilling prophecy is that the right-wing populist vote is often driven by the Gen Z youth, while the hallmark progressivism of millennials is turning middle-aged with them.
In Germany, the populist Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) is the most popular party among people under 30, with an impressive 22%. Similarly, a third of the French 18-to-25-year-oldssupport Marine Le Pen’s National Rally (RN)—with none of the established parties able to break double digits among them—while nearly half of the youngest cohort is expected to cast their ballots for one of the two national conservative parties in Italy (Meloni’s Fratelli d’Italia or Slavini’s Lega).
Geert Wilders’ Dutch Freedom Party (PVV) continues to lead among the youth with its promise to deliver one of the toughest asylum systems in Europe. One in four people under 34 supports Portugal’s Chega (‘Enough’), the nationalist Vlaams Belang enjoys the support of a third of young men under 27 in Belgium, and the anti-immigration Finns Party is the most popular in Finland among every age group below 65.
There are, of course, differences and caveats in each country. For instance, there was never such a great ideological divide between young men and young women, who often tend to favor the Greens, social-progressive, or far-left parties, but are also much more likely to join their male peers in the national conservative camp than vice-versa.
Nonetheless, the writing is on the wall. Europe is turning more right-wing with every passing year and it is not despite but because of the established parties’ awkward efforts to cling to power in a world that no longer wants them.
How generational revolt becomes culture war
In most European countries, the majority of young people are protest voters. There’s no groundbreaking revelation here; the notion of radical political change has always been championed by the youth first. And just as the nature of cyclical social evolution would dictate, we’re now witnessing one youth rebellion wishing to tear down the product of another: the left-liberal hegemony seeded by the students of 1968.
The underlying sentiments against Europe’s current political elites might have been primarily anti-establishment and therefore inherently non-partisan, but since the prevailing paradigm of previous decades was liberal, the ongoing revolution favors those who challenge it from the conservative Right.
“All the others have been calling the shots for long enough,” an 18-year-old AfD-voter in Germany explained in FT’s recent report. “Now it’s our turn.”
Polls in the country also show that the German youth’s primary growing concerns are the economy, inflation, and—consequently—immigration. This is also what another first-time voter and AfD supporter implied, saying that she wonders whether she’ll ever have a pension if things go on as they are. “We face a lot of uncertainties and I just don’t feel they’re being addressed by the old parties,” she added.
What this shows is that there are deeper underlying layers than what’s often simplified—and Americanized—as a one-dimensional “culture war.” The oldest of Generation Z are already in their late-20s. They finished their education years ago and are trying out different career paths in the hope of settling down with some form of financial stability, but their first experience in the outside world is often that it is no longer the one their parents started out in.
Living through multiple recessions, a pandemic, and a war before the age of 30 does not generate the impression of Europe being in competent hands. By now, housing crises and job market saturation have become synonymous with large Western cities, which led an entire generation to question the dogma that ‘multiculturalism is our strength.’
What turned this—initially economic—revolt into a cultural one was the elite’s response to these rising concerns: ‘The problem is not us, it’s you; those who think national interests are above other things are dangerous far-right lunatics.’
We see this effect play out in Germany in real time as we speak. The German establishment’s disproportionately harsh crackdown on a party song with improvised anti-immigration lyrics had the perfect inverse effect and will probably make a larger impact on right-wing youth mobilization than a thousand essays ever could.
The stronger an attack on an idea, the more support it gets among young people, because that’s how it works. Nothing can make the phrase “Germany for Germans” more appealing to a 20-year-old than knowing it’s banned, and the current political elite—whose members grew up fighting against authoritarianism from both sides of the Iron Curtain—should know better.
“It’s like with rock’n’roll in the 1950s—there’s this youthful rebellion,” explained Florian Russ, a regional leader of AfD’s youth wing. “A lot of people listened to Elvis because their parents forbade them to. It’s the same with the AfD. People are asking—are they really so bad? And they check them out and find they’re not bad at all.”
What young people find when they check out these parties are talking points and political positions that are presented as extremist today, but that were not only completely acceptable but entirely mainstream just a few decades ago. So, if the current ruling paradigm no longer offers a viable future, the only rational choice is to return to a better past.
BREAKING: Disease X Is Here, Warns Dr. Peter McCullough
Disabled Canadian Man Says he Has Been Offered Euthanasia ‘Multiple Times’ While in the Hospital
(LifeSiteNews) – A Canadian man who was “very sick” as a kid and now lives with a chronic disability says he feels “completely traumatized” and violated that he was offered state-sanctioned euthanasia “multiple times” instead of getting the proper care he needs while in the hospital.
The man, 49-year-old Roger Foley, was highlighted in a short film by filmmaker Amanda Achtman as part of her Dying to Meet You series.
Foley, speaking from his hospital bed in the video posted on YouTube, said that as he lived his early life as a sick child he was “very uncoordinated and always tired.”
“And then they didn’t really have a lot of testing of what I ended up being diagnosed with. So, I just thought I’m lazy, I can work through it,” he said.
Foley grew up with his dad, who was a plumber and a World War II veteran. He recounted that he had “a lot of perseverance.”
“And I guess that rubbed off on me. When he passed away, it was really hard,” he said.
Foley was asked if he had been offered euthanasia, or medical assistance in dying (MAiD), as it is known to end his life. He confirmed that he had been offered the procedure, which has been legal in Canada since 2016, “multiple times.”
“One time, he asked me, do you have any thoughts of self-harm? I’m honest with him and tell him, I do think about ending my life because of what I’m going through, being prevented from the resources that I need to live safely back at home,” Foley said.
“And from out of nowhere, he just pulls out, ‘Well, if you don’t get self-directed funding, you can always apply for an assisted, you know what I mean?’ You feel so pillaged.”
Foley can’t even ‘function’ without medication. He’s at the mercy of hospital staff.
LifeSiteNews was unable to reach Foley before publication to ask him more questions about having been offered euthanasia.
In the video, Foley, who did not disclose the exact nature of his condition, only noting that he could not “even function” without medication and that he is “bedridden,” he noted that Canada’s current healthcare system has not helped him to live his life better, but instead caused him more struggles.
“It’s completely traumatized me,” said Foley, adding that now “it’s this overlying option, where in my situation when I say I’m suicidal, I’m met with, ‘Well, you know, the hospital has a program to help you with that if you want to end your life.’”
“That didn’t exist before MAiD was legalized. But now it’s there. There is not going to be a second within the rest of my life that I’m going to have flashbacks to it, the devaluing of me and all that I am,” he noted.
Due to Foley’s inability to do basic tasks with the help of another person, he has had to rely on the help of hospital staff for almost everything.
When it comes to MAiD, he observed that the mainstream narrative that opposition to it only comes from people of faith is nothing but “gaslighting.”
“That’s the ultimate gaslighting statement. Like I’m not religious, I respect people who are religious. Saying that it’s just religious persons who oppose euthanasia and assisted suicide are completely wrong,” he said.
Foley observed that when it comes to his future, he has “hope” that soon he will be able to “break” through the “system” so that he can live at home.
“The thing that gives me hope is that one day this titanium wall of a system, I’ll be able to, to break through it and get access to the resources that I need and to live at home with workers who want to work with me, and I want to work with them,” he said.
“And we can work as a team … I have a passion to that. Like, I don’t want to give up my life.”
In February, after pushback from pro-life, medical, and mental health groups, as well as most of Canada’s provinces, the federal government under Prime Minister Justin Trudeau delayed its planned expansion of MAiD to those suffering solely from mental illness to 2027.
The number of Canadians killed by lethal injection since 2016 stands at close to around 65,000, with an estimated 16,000 deaths in 2023 alone, and many fear that because the official statistics are manipulated the number may be even higher.
Indeed, a recent Statistics Canada update admitted to excluding euthanasia from its death totals despite it being the sixth-highest cause of mortality in the nation.
Earlier this week, LifeSiteNews published a report noting how a Canadian combat veteran and artillery gunner revealed, while speaking on a podcast with Dr. Jordan Peterson, that the drugs used in MAiD essentially waterboard a person to death.
BREAKING: Disease X Is Here, Warns Dr. Peter McCullough