News

Authorities believe male illegals were transporting teen to California

Authorities in Missouri arrested five illegal aliens suspected of kidnapping a young girl in Indiana this week, according to reports.

During the overnight hours between Sunday and Monday, a search was launched for a 14-year-old girl after her father reported her missing to police in Indiana.

The man said he saw his daughter enter a black Dodge Durango and alerted the Logansport Police Department, Fox 4 reports.

Just before 2 a.m. on Monday, the victim’s phone pinged from a vehicle traveling along U.S. Route 36 near Hannibal, MO.

A Missouri State Highway Patrol (MSHP) trooper spotted the SUV a short time later in Macon County and initiated a traffic stop.

The trooper encountered a girl in the backseat of the vehicle who identified herself as the missing teen.

The girl was immediately removed from the SUV and 5 men inside were arrested.

Authorities later determined the suspects, all of whom are illegally present in the U.S., were likely planning to transport the girl to California.

X user Illegal Alien Crimes has published photos and probable cause statements for each suspect, which identify their nationalities:

• Carlos Onias Funez, 56 (Honduras)
• Daniel Ruiz Lopez, 19 (Honduras or Mexico)
• Arturo Arteaga Eustaquio, 41 (Mexico)
• Marlon Pinda Aguilar, 44 (Mexico)
• Noe Guzman Hernandez, 24 (Mexico)

All five men were each charged with second-degree kidnapping and first-degree endangerment of the welfare of a child.

An investigation and legal proceedings are ongoing.

InfoWars has been documenting the surge of crime fueled by the ongoing Biden border invasion.

---

Learn Why Chucky Schumer Serves Uncooked Burgers With Cheese

Dan Lyman on X | Gab

The future being created for humanity is deeply disturbing

During Thursday’s edition of The Alex Jones Show, viewers learned about the sick Bill Gates project to feed people maggot milk.

DISGUSTING: Bill Gates Wants You To Eat Maggot Milk pic.twitter.com/BlgK42nRDX

— Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) June 20, 2024

---

Reporter claims raid in relation to a ‘public corruption investigation of Mayor Sheng Thao and her boyfriend.’

FBI agents on Thursday conducted an early morning raid on the home of Democrat Oakland Mayor Sheng Thao, possibly in relation to a corruption probe.

Agents with the bureau were seen removing boxes from the mayor’s home around 10AM, however they did not immediately identify the cause of the raid.

?BREAKING: The FBI has raided the home of Oakland Democrat Mayor Sheng Thao.

Story developing. pic.twitter.com/b4o2MV7Knt

— I Meme Therefore I Am ?? (@ImMeme0) June 20, 2024

“The FBI is conducting court authorized law enforcement activity on Maiden Lane. We are unable to provide additional information at this time,” the FBI said.

In a statement on X, ABC7 chief investigative reporter Dan Noyes claimed he’d received a tip from a law enforcement source the raid was in relation to a “public corruption investigation of Thao and her boyfriend.”

FBI NOW CLEAR FROM OAKLAND MAYOR SHENG THAO’S HOUSE. Good law-enforcement source tells me this is a public corruption investigation of Thao and her boyfriend. pic.twitter.com/LnQbrs3NPp

— Dan Noyes (@dannoyes) June 20, 2024

In a follow-up, Noyes added sources claim the raid also “involves the IRS and U.S. Postal Service.”

BREAKING: Sources tell ABC News that the FBI raid at home of Oakland Mayor Sheng Thao also involves the IRS and U.S. Postal Service. I just arrived at the scene. Spotted FBI Agent briefly on balcony. pic.twitter.com/KrUb0yL6uk

— Dan Noyes (@dannoyes) June 20, 2024

CBS News reports: “The FBI was also serving a warrant on at least one other property nearby, a home on Viewcrest Court in the city’s Ridgemont neighborhood.”

Reports state Thao was scheduled to appear at a San Francisco event on Thursday with other mayors, however she did not show up.

The raid comes as a recall petition earlier this week by the group OUST (Oakland United to Recall Sheng Thao) received over 40,000 signatures, which puts Thao’s position up for a vote in upcoming elections.

OUST’s contentions with Thao include her efforts to defund police, the unjust termination of a police chief which made crime explode, and general incompetence making her unfit to lead the city.

“In just a year, Thao’s incompetence and dishonesty accelerated Oakland’s decline, causing longstanding businesses to close and generational families to leave,” the group’s website states, adding, “Lives lost and businesses failed, all due to Thao’s inability to fulfill her duties as Oakland’s mayor.”

---

---

The site in northern Canada could hold more than 200 million tons of rare earth elements (REEs), which are used in green energy production and weapons manufacturing.

China’s recent attempt to secure a rare earth minerals stockpile ended in failure when a competitor stepped in to snag the deal.

Vital Metals, a mining firm based in Australia, announced Monday that minerals collected from its Saskatchewan-based Nechalacho Project will remain within Canadian borders.

“We were presented with a case of elevated interest for Canada,” Vital’s managing director Geordie Mark told The Northern Miner, later adding: “This agreement highlights the strategic value and importance of the Nechalacho rare earths project and the prioritization of a rare earths value chain in Canada.”

According to Vital, the Nechalacho site in northern Canada could hold more than 200 million tons of rare earth elements (REEs), which are used in green energy production and weapons manufacturing. Right now, China dominates the industry despite its comparatively small natural stock, clinching 75% of the global market with only 35% of the global REE reserves.

“China was only able to establish such dominance over the REE industry in part because of lax environmental regulations,” said Harvard Independent Review’s Jaya Nayar. “Low cost, high pollution methods enabled China to outpace competitors and create a stronghold in the international REE market.”

That’s because rare earths can indeed produce green energy—but only after generating 2,000 times their weight in catastrophically toxic waste. Many Western nations refuse to accept this tradeoff inside their own borders, imposing heavy regulations on domestic REE producers that keep exporters like China competitive despite high asking prices.

What’s pushing Canada to allow REE mining and reap the profits, despite environmental risks?

The answer lies within the Canadian critical minerals list, which includes REEs and 33 other elements/elemental groups deemed strategically and economically significant. A recent expansion of the list added high-purity iron, phosphorus, and silicon, which—like REEs and 20 other elements on the list—are key components of the green energy transition. This update, plus the last-minute swoop to protect REE supplies, gives a glimpse into the role “green” policy will play and foreshadows increasing pressure on component supply chains. If other countries follow Canada’s example, prices of related metals on that critical list—including cobalt, platinum group metals, REEs, silicon, and copper—could see significant boosts. That’s a bet Canada is placing early by securing its access to REEs while cutting China out of the deal.

The recent Canadian purchase from Vital is also part of a larger economic and political salvo led by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, who told reporters there will be no reconciliation between Canada and China following accusations of election meddling. On the mining stage, Canada is marketing itself as a direct competitor to China, flaunting its enormous mineral reserves as an alternative source for wary European countries afraid to rely on Chinese producers. China’s dominance won’t be shaken by missing a single deal with the Australian firm, though the move certainly sends a message calculated to exacerbate already strained relations between China and the West.

As if its challenge weren’t clear enough, Canada recently joined the U.S., Japan, and the Philippines to conduct military exercises in the South China Sea. Tensions between the four countries are on the rise, and economics is the prime battlefield. With REEs as a strategic focus and green energy policies on the Western docket, nations may put pressure on each other by sanctioning or otherwise straining metals supply chains—a move strategists on both sides will surely consider. With two of the world’s largest holders of rare earths reserves vying for stockpiles, the pressure on consumer countries to pick sides is growing, and this new symptom of conflict in the metals market will likely boost REE and related metal prices as countries stock up while supplies last.

It’s not just rare earths that will see gains. Silver, though not deemed “critical,” is a component of electric vehicles and other “green” technologies that governments (and private investors) will likely snap up in anticipation of tighter supply. Stress on metals supply chains is part of gold’s lifeblood, suggesting higher prices for this metal as well.

Good news for investors looking to shoot straight for the heart: REE prices bottomed out last year, indicating they’re due for revival and primed for a low buy.

“I’ve seen forward-looking studies that … don’t even factor in demand from defense sectors that push [the global annual turnover for REEs] well over a trillion dollars by the time we reach 2050,” said Melissa Sanderson, a consultant at American Rare Earths. “It’s a good, strong market now, and it’s one that appears to have healthy legs under it.”

---

MUST WATCH: Dr. David Martin Interview — U.S. Gov. Is Coordinating A Depopulation Program Against The World

---

This type of behavior is why people are leaving the Democrat Party in droves

During a recent MSNBC segment, anchor Joy Reid and Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) both laughed out loud while talking about a thirteen-year-old girl being molested by an illegal alien.

The illegal immigrant from Ecuador was taken into custody by the NYPD on Monday where he confessed to raping a 13-year-old girl in a park at knifepoint in broad daylight and filming the attack.

In a news segment downplaying the very real impact of illegal immigration on Americans, Reid and Jayapal called the increased attention to the matter “fearmongering.”

Watch as Rep. Jaypal (D) and Joy Reid chuckle and call the r*pe of a 13-year-old girl by an illegal “fear-mongering.”

What part about the r*pe of a minor is “fear-mongering” and funny to you @PramilaJayapal @JoyAnnReid?? pic.twitter.com/Q2mDcwlI4d

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) June 20, 2024

Next, Reid highlighted “one of the reasons people” are becoming more fearful of the millions of people from across the world illegally entering America.

The MSNBC host showed three different screenshots of news outlets covering Joe Biden’s recent executive order giving at least 500,000 illegals protection from being deported.

CNN and MSNBC banners Reid showed highlighted Biden announcing protections for “undocumented” spouses of U.S. citizens while the Fox News banner stated, “Migrant Arrested For Raping 13-Year-Old NYC Girl.”

Immediately after reading the Fox banner out loud, Jayapal blurted out a huge laugh with Reid responding, “Yes!”

“So, I think that’s part of the problem… fearmongering,” Reid added.

Jayapal agreed, “Exactly.”

The disturbing interaction is a good example of how the Democrat are willing to place their political aspirations ahead of the safety of American citizens.

---

The Fed’s biggest ally is the ignorance of the general public. They don’t know about the Fed and have no interest in learning about it.

Money is never an object when you have a legal counterfeiting racket at the center of the economy, yet counterfeiting, provided it has monopoly power and conducted by the “best and the brightest,” is virtually unchallenged as necessary for economic growth. 

How did this fraud come about? First, some basics:

• We are all under State rule, meaning under the rule of a monopoly of force that most people cherish in principle as a necessary precondition for civilization, however that might be defined. Monopoly, meaning “single seller,” meaning no competition allowed, is regarded as wrong by most people. Yet it is saluted worldwide when it arrives in the form of a State.

What is it that the State alleges to sell? Protection. As the story goes, the Constitution protects us from our protector:

• States extract their funding by force, called taxation. Since WWII the US has put personal income taxes on a periodic payment plan called withholding. It’s easier, and less subject to revolt, to pay taxes when the money you earn never reaches your hands and instead goes directly into government coffers. 
• State rulers, being relatively small in number, need allies, and it acquires these by dispensing favors or issuing often tacit threats. Both kinds lock in the recipient’s obedience, and the State in effect grows. Corporate media becomes the primary disseminator of State propaganda.
• As they expand, States need more funding than they dare collect with taxes, so they legalize a counterfeiting operation and call it a central bank. The American public was told a central bank was needed to eliminate those embarrassing Panics of the 19th century and the one in 1907. So we got one. Today it’s usually called the Fed. 

Payoff was almost immediate as it helped finance US entry into Europe’s Great War, on the grounds that there was nothing like massive slaughter of all life forms to ensure lasting peace. Civilian and military casualties were driven to astronomical levels by central bank funding of governments. It takes lots of “money” to kill at that level, “money” no longer being gold but fiat bills that can be produced virtually without limit. 

“Panic” was also abandoned as a word to make way for all the calamities the Fed has created since its inception, though only a small band of economists lay the blame on Fed counterfeiting. Incredibly, for the Great Depression, the Fed accepts blame for not counterfeiting enough.

Fed allies called court economists justify the counterfeiting as necessary for a growing economy. How the economy grew in the days before the counterfeiting is not a question they’re eager to address. Nor do they call it counterfeiting, of course; the preferred phrase is “monetary policy.”

The counterfeiter is engaged in the exchange of nothing for something. But how did this come to be a highly-profitable policy for government and done so in a manner that not “one man in a million” knows or even cares about? Murray Rothbard provides a compelling narrative in What Has Government Done to Our Money?:

For government to use counterfeiting to add to its revenue, many lengthy steps must be travelled down the road away from the free market. Government could not simply invade a functioning free market and print its own paper tickets. Done so abruptly, few people would accept the government’s money. . .

Until a few centuries ago, there were no banks, and therefore the government could not use the banking engine for massive inflation as it can today. What could it do when only gold and silver circulated?

The first step, taken firmly by every sizable government, was to seize an absolute monopoly of the minting business. That was the indispensable means of getting control of the coinage supply. . . .

Having acquired the mintage monopoly, governments fostered the use of the name of the monetary unit, doing their best to separate the name from its true base in the underlying weight of the coin. This, too, was a highly important step, for it liberated each government from the necessity of abiding by the common money of the world market. Instead of using grains or grams of gold or silver, each State fostered its own national name in the supposed interests of monetary patriotism: dollars, marks, francs, and the like [emphasis mine]. The shift made possible the preeminent means of governmental counterfeiting of coin: debasement. . ..

Sometimes, the government committed simple fraud, secretly diluting gold with a base alloy, making shortweight coins. More characteristically, the mint melted and recoined all the coins of the realm, giving the subjects back the same number of “pounds” or “marks,” but of a lighter weight. The leftover ounces of gold or silver were pocketed by the King and used to pay his expenses. . ..

The switch from weights of gold to patriotic names drew monetary power away from owners of money. But since it was patriotic, few complained, and fewer still understood the implications:

Once such a label replaces the recognized world units of weight, it becomes much easier for governments to manipulate the money unit and give it an apparent life of its own ….

With the name of the country’s currency now prominent in accounting instead of its actual weight, contracts began to pledge payment in certain amounts of “money.” Legal tender laws dictated what that “money” could be [e.g., dollars, francs] . . ..

Money substitutes become money

Governmental control of money could only become absolute, and its counterfeiting unchallenged, as money-substitutes came into prominence in recent centuries. The advent of paper money and bank deposits, an economic boon when backed fully by gold or silver, provided the open sesame for government’s road to power over money, and thereby over the entire economic system.

Banks are required to redeem their sworn liabilities on demand. Yet with the practice of fractional-reserve banking, no bank can fulfill its liabilities. 

Panics arose when the public caught on and started pulling their money out of banks. If only we had an elastic currency that could be stretched to satisfy demanding clients, bankers complained. Gold or silver were grossly deficient for this purpose. Thus, in 1910 big bankers got together with a government official at Jekyll Island, Georgia and concocted a scheme that could provide emergency credit to troubled banks. Not every bank, but at least the biggest ones. The scheme was a central bank, though it wasn’t called that, and all that was needed to perfect it was to get rid of actual money — the gold — and declare the money substitutes — the paper receipts known as dollars — as the new money. 

Honesty would dictate imprinting the Jolly Roger instead of Washington’s face, but no one wanted to be honest.

The Triumph of Monetary Fraud

The new money would be under exclusive control of a closed society known as the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) that would, from time to time, decide how much of it to create or destroy. Their decision-making is called monetary policy. We must always remember, FOMC monetary policy is hard stuff.

Yet, one of the most astute insights into monetary theory came from Milton Friedman, no friend of gold, who wrote:

If a domestic money consists of a commodity, a pure gold standard or cowrie bead standard, the principles of monetary policy are very simple. There aren’t any. The commodity money takes care of itself. (Quoted in Salerno)

Imagine that. If we had a free market-determined money like gold, we would be in charge of our economic lives and not the counterfeiters on the FOMC. 

Monetary economists outside the Austrian school believe that economic bliss is price stability. Small price rises they call inflation are okay, but a general price decline, called deflation, is the stuff of nightmares. The price declines of the late 19th century, one of the most prosperous periods in human history, is a puzzle they have yet to solve. Yet lower prices are the natural outcome of an unfettered market. So are the price declines/high profits in high tech since the introduction of the integrated circuit in the 1960s.

Conclusion

The Fed’s biggest ally is the ignorance of the general public. They don’t know about the Fed and have no interest in learning about it. As a presidential candidate Ron Paul educated the public in the destructiveness of the federal reserve but the public has gone back to sleep. Or to the extent that it hasn’t they’re concerned about how the Fed will do its duty and fight the inflation we’re dealing with today. The creator of inflation is called on to become its avenger. 

The best way to stop the ravages we experience is to undo their source. A government with its legal monopoly power removed could never get away with creating a monstrosity like the federal reserve. Call it anarchy if you like, but such a government is what we’ve known for a long time, an unrestrained free market.

---

MUST WATCH: Dr. David Martin Interview — U.S. Gov. Is Coordinating A Depopulation Program Against The World

---