News

Trump is inseparably tied to the price of precious metals.

Dr. Kirk Elliot joined Alex Jones on the Tuesday show to break down how the price of silver and gold is responding to Trump’s attempted assassination.

Don’t miss:

Alex Jones’ Ideas Are Bulletproof Analysis— Must-Watch

---

One Spiegel journalist got a taste of the unfortunate reality that millions of Germans have experienced due to the immigration crisis.

A journalist for Germany’s left-leaning Spiegel Magazine, known for its pro-migration views and efforts against the anti-immigration Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, stepped in to protect two elderly women near the North Sea coast, which resulted in a 13-year-old Syrian punching him in the face. Now, he is complaining about a lack of consequences for the youth.

Christian Neef is a well-known journalist for the outlet and has been working for many years for Spiegel. However, Neef himself said he “defended two elderly” women in Husum in the German state of Schleswig-Holstein, which resulted in consequences.

“Today, I had my own experience with a so-called refugee. In Husum, a Syrian punched me in the face. I had defended two elderly women who asked him to get off the back of a public bench on which they were sitting and not to continue to spit at their feet. The interesting thing: The police told me that it was a 13-year-old Syrian who was well-known in the city and who had been caught over 50 times for theft and violent crimes since the beginning of 2024 alone. Sanctions available: none.”

The post led to widespread mockery on X as a case of a liberal journalist suddenly confronting what tens of thousands experience every year, with violence, sexual assault, and robberies skyrocketing in Germany due to mass immigration.

One X user wrote, “It could be that they learned more in this moment than in their 26 years at Spiegel.
If they’re lucky.”

Another wrote, “Individual case, as always,” with the user referring to the left-liberal tendency to describe the many cases of individual crimes involving migrants as “individual” cases that do not represent migrants as a whole. For many critics of this term, the “individual” cases accumulate into hundreds of thousands of crimes that have affected millions of Germans.

Ex-AfD politician Tatjana Festerling wrote, “Oh well! The Big Thinking people in the Refugees Welcome whining editorial offices need their own ‘experiences’ before they realize that low-trust cultures can never be integrated into high-trust societies. When I explained this in Pegida speeches in 2015, the reaction was ‘Racist!’”

Some users said the problem would only get worse due to a general disregard for German laws from many within the immigrant population, with one writing: “German laws apparently motivate many Muslims not to comply with them. What is going on should actually be called what it is: terror against the native population. And of course, things are not getting any better, quite the opposite. The terror continues until the goal is achieved and dozens of countries have done that.”

While speaking with German newspaper Junge Freiheit in response to what had happened, a police spokesman stated that they were aware of the incident.

“No information will be given about the identity of the suspect, who is still a child. The suspect comes from the district and has already come to the attention of the police due to similar crimes,” said the spokesman, who refused to provide any more details.

As Remix News reported in the past, the issue of underage migrants flagrantly conducting criminal activity in Germany is a major problem, as current laws do not allow for any type of punishment. Just this weekend, an 11-year-old Moroccan migrant leading a youth gang was arrested for over 70 burglaries in and outside Hamburg but will face no jail time. In some cases, even one involving the rape of an 11-year-old girl, the German state has refused to issue jail time because the criminal migrant was under the age of 18.

---

BREAKING: Economist Warns Attempted Assassination Of Trump Will Trigger Explosion In The Price Of Silver And Gold As China Increases Demand

---

Police have not ruled out terror as a motive, reports say.

A British soldier is fighting for his life after being stabbed outside an army base in southeast England on Tuesday evening.

The soldier, who was in full uniform, was stabbed near Brompton Barracks in Gillingham, Kent at around 6 p.m. He was airlifted to hospital and is reportedly in a “serious” condition. 

Kent Police said a 24-year-old local man has been arrested on suspicion of attempted murder. They have also not ruled out terrorism as a motive, the Telegraph reports.

A witness told The Times that the attacker pulled up on a moped. “This was with two kitchen knives, about nine to 10 inches long, and there were about seven of us there who witnessed it,” according to the bystander.

“The soldier was in uniform. He works at the barracks, lives in Sally Port Gardens, and was walking home. His wife tried to pull the attacker off.”

The attacker then escaped on the moped.

Another witness who tried to help the soldier told The Sun: “The only person he was targeting was the soldier he attacked.”

“Blood was everywhere as I tried to apply pressure to his wounds until the police arrived,” he added. “When the guy’s wife came out and started trying to pull the guy off he didn’t even try to hurt her.”

Other witnesses said they heard a “blood-curdling scream” as the soldier was attacked. Moments later, the attacker ran his finger across the knife and licked it, one person told The Sun. To date, the known details of the attack are similar to the murder of Lee Rigby, a soldier who was stabbed to death near the Royal Artillery Barracks in Woolwich, southeast London, eleven years ago.

The Gillingham attack occurred on the same day that radical Islamist preacher Anjem Choudary was convicted of terrorism offences at a court in London.

Choudary was accused of directing Al-Muhajiroun (ALM), a banned international terror organisation. During his trial, he admitted to officiating at the wedding of one of the killers of Lee Rigby.

“I was there when he [the killer] became Muslim. I officiated at his marriage. I believe then he stopped associating with anyone I know for years before Lee Rigby was killed,” Choudary told the court.

He was also asked why he had described the killing as “famous.” He responded that it had put Woolwich “on the map.”

Choudary was jailed for five years in 2016 for inviting support for Islamic State, but was released just two years later, subject to strict licence conditions, including a ban on using the internet. However, within three weeks of those terms lapsing in July 2021, he was already putting out messages on social media platforms such as WhatsApp and Telegram.

Choudary then gave more than 40 lectures to a spin-off of ALM in New York, attracting a global audience. He was arrested again last July following a joint investigation by MI5, Scotland Yard, the NYPD, and Canadian police.

Experts are incredulous that Choudary was allowed any internet access after his release, given his long history of radicalising followers.

Alan Mendoza, executive director of the Henry Jackson Society, told the Mail: “He needed to have a different class of conditions and surveillance to keep him from reoffending and trying to radicalise the next generation. The reality was it was no surprise—anyone could have predicted that this is exactly what Choudary would do as soon as he had the means.”

---

BREAKING: Economist Warns Attempted Assassination Of Trump Will Trigger Explosion In The Price Of Silver And Gold As China Increases Demand

---

Polish special services have launched a manhunt for the suspect in the fatal stabbing of a young soldier at the Belarus border who succumbed to his injuries in June.

Polish authorities have pinpointed and are tracking the individual responsible for the murder of a 21-year-old Polish soldier guarding the border with Belarus, according to unofficial sources from commercial radio RMF FM. The attack occurred on May 28, with Sergeant Mateusz Sitek succumbing to his injuries days later.

Investigations have revealed that the assailant is from the Middle East and currently in Belarus, potentially planning to flee to Syria. The identification of the Polish soldier’s murderer was achieved through the analysis of video footage recorded during the border attack. This critical evidence enabled officials to ascertain the attacker’s appearance.

For several weeks, Polish special services interrogated migrants who had entered Poland and utilized informants from migrant groups in Belarus. This thorough investigation has identified the man who, on May 28, during an attempted breach by a group of migrants near the village of Dubicze Cerkiewne, fatally stabbed Sitek with a knife attached to a stick.

Following the attack, the 21-year-old sergeant was transported to a local hospital and later to the Military Medical Institute in Warsaw, where his death was announced on June 6. The Belarusian authorities have not cooperated in apprehending the murderer, underscoring the complicity of Lukashenko’s government in the killing. The situation requires action from special services.

In early June, Poland formally requested Minsk’s assistance in identifying and arresting the murderer. However, officials from Alexander Lukashenko’s administration have ignored the request, and unless there is a sudden political shift, it is expected they will continue to do so. It is important to note that Minsk has been orchestrating further assaults by migrants on the Polish border.

There is a possibility that upon the revelation of his identification, the assailant may flee Belarus for Syria or another Middle Eastern country. Capturing him there and bringing him to trial might actually prove easier for Polish authorities than apprehending him from Belarus.

The case has been discussed by Minister of Defense Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz, who emphasized that the prosecution and both civil and military special services are conducting the investigation. 

“The outcome is of utmost importance; this case is absolutely vital, prioritizing the security of the Polish state and its citizens,” he stated.

Kosiniak-Kamysz further declared that anyone committing such a heinous act as an attack on a Polish soldier must face the consequences, and the state will relentlessly pursue and punish the perpetrator.

---

BREAKING: Economist Warns Attempted Assassination Of Trump Will Trigger Explosion In The Price Of Silver And Gold As China Increases Demand

---

Farage says the new home secretary “wants to bury illegal immigration as a subject” altogether.

It’s difficult to imagine how the Labour government’s approach to illegal migration could be any softer than that of the Conservative administrations that came before it. But new home secretary Yvette Cooper is giving it a good go.

For starters, her department is labelling illegal Channel crossings not as “illegal” but “irregular.” This, said Reform leader Nigel Farage, demonstrates from the off that “Labour wants to bury illegal immigration as a subject.”

Now, after barely three weeks in office, Cooper has announced plans to fast-track the processing of more than 100,000 asylum claims of people the last government said would not be permitted to settle here. The Refugee Council—a refugees’ rights organisation which was openly delighted by the home secretary’s appointment—estimates that up to 90,000 people will be granted asylum in the UK.

As ineffective as the Conservatives might have been at tackling illegal migration, former home secretary James Cleverly was right to describe this move as an “effective amnesty” which will encourage more migrants to risk the dangerous journey across the Channel. Before the July 4th election, migrants themselves said a Labour government would be an “incredible” boost for crossings.

More than 2,000 migrants have crossed the Channel since Starmer became prime minister earlier this month, and the figure stands at almost 16,000 for the year as a whole.

Only small pockets of illegal migrants are expected to be returned to their countries of origin. Sir Keir Starmer’s Labour Party has long indicated that it would direct its attention not to deterring migrants from crossing the Channel but to “smashing the gangs” behind this movement, instead. It scrapped the Conservative government’s scheme for deterring illegal migration—the ‘Rwanda Plan’—in its first full day in office.

Farage yesterday used his maiden speech in Parliament to highlight that, while previous Labour governments deported illegal migrants in large numbers, “none of that happens anymore” because of the “increased role” of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), whose convention was enshrined into British law under Labour.

The Reform leader said the ECHR has “now completely outlived its usefulness” and called for a referendum on Britain’s membership of it.

The Conservatives, who pretended to be interested in questioning the overreach of the court in UK politics, are highly unlikely to back this proposal. Starmer has also made it clear that, under his leadership, “we will never withdraw.”

---

BREAKING: Economist Warns Attempted Assassination Of Trump Will Trigger Explosion In The Price Of Silver And Gold As China Increases Demand

---

World leaders react on ICJ’s landmark decision.

The International Court of Justice (ICJ), the highest United Nations body for hearing disputes between states, has ruled 14-1 that Israel’s presence in the occupied Palestinian territories is unlawful and should come to an end “as rapidly as possible” as it issued an unprecedented and sweeping condemnation of Jerusalem’s rule over the lands it captured 57 years ago.

ICJ President Nawaf Salam read out the “nonbinding advisory opinion” issued by the 15-judge panel. They pointed to a wide list of policies, including the building and expansion of Israeli settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, the use of the area’s natural resources, the annexation and imposition of permanent control over lands and discriminatory policies against Palestinians. According to them, all of these measures violated international laws against acquiring territory by force and impeded Palestinians’ right to self-determination.

According to a summary of the more than 80-page opinion, other nations were not obliged to “render aid or assistance in maintaining” Israel’s occupation in the said territory. Israel’s “abuse of its status as the occupying power” renders its “presence in the occupied Palestinian territory unlawful,” the court said.

“Israeli settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, and the regime associated with them, have been established and are being maintained in violation of international law,” the decision further read.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu criticized ICJ’s opinion, saying the territories are part of the Jewish people’s historic homeland. But the resounding breadth of the decision could impact international opinion and fuel moves for unilateral recognition of a Palestinian state. The court’s opinion was sought by the UN General Assembly after a Palestinian request concerning Israel’s massive genocidal assaults on Gaza.

According to The Hague court, the General Assembly and Security Council should consider “the precise modalities” to end Netanyahu’s men’s presence in the territories. UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres will send the advisory opinion to the 193-member world body.

“It is for the General Assembly to decide how to proceed in the matter,” UN deputy spokesperson Farhan Haq said.

Guterres has signified his call once again for Israel and the Palestinians to engage “on the long-delayed political path towards ending the occupation and resolving the conflict in line with international law, relevant resolutions and bilateral agreements,” the spokesperson said.

Guterres also stressed that a two-state solution is “the only viable path” to seeing Israel and “a fully independent, democratic, contiguous, viable and sovereign Palestinian state” living side by side in peace and security, Haq said.

World leaders react on ICJ’s landmark decision

Following the historic decision of the ICJ, leaders from around the globe reacted. Palestinian officials lauded ICJ and said the Justice ruling was a “watershed moment” in their decades-long fight for justice. Israel’s reaction is expected to be not favorable as the United States’ top ally criticized the ruling on Saturday, July 20, after initial silence.

United Kingdom’s newly formed Labour government said it “respects the independence of the ICJ” and is considering the ruling before making an official response. The Foreign Office added the U.K. is “strongly opposed to the expansion of illegal settlements and rising settler violence.”

(Related: EU states considering SANCTIONS against Israel for defiance against ICJ ceasefire order.)

For Norwegian Foreign Affairs Minister Espen Barth Eide, the ICJ ruling is crystal clear. “Israeli policies and practices are to be considered annexation of large parts of the Occupied Palestinian Territory, and are in violation of international law,” he wrote on X. Malaysia called on all states to compel Israel to abide by the ruling of the ICJ and immediately end their support to Israel in continuing its illegal occupation of Palestine.

Jordan’s Minister of Foreign Affairs Ayman Sadadi said: “Israel’s impunity must end. Its war crimes must be stopped. Israel must be held accountable.” Moreover, Kuwait’s foreign minister called on the international community to carry out its “legal, political and moral duties to achieve the aspirations of the brotherly Palestinian people to establish their independent state and to stop the aggression against Gaza.” Saudi Arabia welcomed the ruling while stressing the “need to take practical and credible steps to reach a just and comprehensive solution to the Palestinian cause.”

Meanwhile, U.S. President Joe Biden’s administration denounced the ICJ’s opinion that Israeli settlements are “inconsistent” with international law.

“We are concerned that the breadth of the court’s opinion will complicate efforts to resolve the conflict and bring about an urgently needed just and lasting peace with two states living side by side in peace and security,” the Department of State told Reuters.

On the other side, Spain was taking a safer stance. “The government urges the UN and the international community to take into consideration the conclusions of the report and to adopt appropriate measures in this regard,” it said.

IsraelCollapse.com contains similar stories regarding Israeli violations of international law.

---

BREAKING: Economist Warns Attempted Assassination Of Trump Will Trigger Explosion In The Price Of Silver And Gold As China Increases Demand

---