‘African’ Restaurant Bans Men Under 35, Women Under 30 To Keep Out Rowdy Young Night Crowd
A St. Louis, Missouri, restaurant is making waves online after local news outlets picked up on a unique age restriction being enforced at the business.
With late-night crowds in the city often becoming unruly, the owners of a West African and Caribbean restaurant called Bliss decided only to allow men 35 years old and up or women 30 years old and up to enter past 7 pm.
Amid rash of violence from teens in St. Louis, owners of new restaurant say men must be 35-years-old & women must be over 30 to enter pic.twitter.com/AKwpIO8Yy5
— Breaking911 (@Breaking911) June 3, 2024
An assistant manager at the business explained, “It’s just something for the older people to come do and have a happy hour, come get some good food and not have to worry about some of the young folks that bring some of that drama.”
Regarding the small amount of backlash online, Bliss owner Marvin Pate said, “That’s OK because we’re sticking to our code.”
After 7 pm, customers will be asked to show ID to a hostess or a St. Louis County police officer to confirm their age.
Learn More:
NYC Hotel Room Prices Skyrocket as 20% of Hotels Converted to Migrant Shelters
Average hotel room prices in New York City have exploded now that 20% of hotels have been converted into shelters for illegal aliens.
The average hotel room rate in the city reached a record high of $301 a night since 1 out of every 5 hotels have turned into migrant shelters since 2022, the New York Times reported last week.
“About 135 of the city’s roughly 680 hotels entered the shelter program, with many congregated in Midtown Manhattan, Long Island City in Queens and near Kennedy International Airport — all traditional magnets for tourists,” The Times reported.
“Participating hotels are paid up to $185 a night per room, according to the city. Not a single one has converted back into a traditional hotel.“
From The Times continued:
The migrant shelters — along with other factors that include inflation, the loss of Airbnb short-term rentals and an expected decline in new hotel construction — have propelled the nightly cost of an average room to record levels.
The average daily rate for a hotel stay in New York City increased to $301.61 in 2023, up 8.5 percent from $277.92 in 2022, according to CoStar, a leading provider of commercial real estate data and analysis. During the first three months of 2024, when prices traditionally dip, the average stay was still 6.7 percent higher than during the same time period last year: $230.79 a night, up from $216.38 in 2023.
All told, NYC surrendered 16,532 hotel rooms to the 65,000 migrants that have flooded the city, leaving 121,677 hotel rooms for travelers, according to data compiled by CoStar.
The city said the sheltering program will cost $10 billion over three fiscal years.
“During peak periods, try getting a hotel on a Tuesday, Wednesday or Thursday night in midtown Manhattan, and, if you can, you could end up paying dearly,” said Daniel H. Lesser, a co-founder of LW Hospitality Advisors. “It’s all supply-and-demand related, and the migrant rooms have reduced the amount of supply.”
To add insult to injury, the price hikes are affecting middle-class tourists the most since migrants have taken the majority of affordable options.
“I really believe it’s enabled two-, two-and-a-half-star hotels to be a little more emboldened, to take advantage of the situation and charge prices that perhaps they wouldn’t otherwise be able to,” said Sean Hennessey, a hotel industry adviser and clinical associate professor at New York University.
This is a long-term resettlement/invasion campaign instigated by the Biden administration’s open-border agenda and it’s unlikely these hotels will ever convert back to regular lodgings for ordinary Americans, given what we’re already seeing in Europe.
Rolling Stone Calls US Supreme Court ‘Ridiculous, Right-Wing’ Group Captured By ‘Dark Money’
A new article published in Rolling Stone magazine Monday accused the United States Supreme Court of being controlled by “right-wing” dark money interests.
“The Most Ridiculous, Right-Wing Supreme Court That Dark Money Could Buy,” reads the headline.
The magazine’s official X account wrote, “The Supreme Court has been successfully captured by right-wing, dark money interests. The result: a court that’s in your body, working to elect Donald Trump, and in-your-face corrupt.”
The Supreme Court has been successfully captured by right-wing, dark money interests.
— Rolling Stone (@RollingStone) June 3, 2024
The result: a court that’s in your body, working to elect Donald Trump, and in-your-face corrupt.
More: https://t.co/DIKb5gg8pS pic.twitter.com/WSeFvnIsw5
The author, Andrew Perez, claimed SCOTUS has reshaped “our laws and society according to their reactionary, far-right vision” over the past twenty years.
Touching on the fact that the court currently has a conservative majority, Perez wrote, “Right-wing extremists can impose their ideological and religious views on the rest of us — at will.”
Perez attacked Justice Clarence Thomas by falsely claiming his wife tried to “overturn” the 2020 presidential election, and Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. for daring to fly the “Appeal to Heaven” pine tree flag used by a squadron of schooners under George Washington’s Continental Army during the American Revolution.
Later in the hit piece, Rolling Stone nagged about several recent SCOTUS rulings that upset the American left without providing any insight into the constitutional reasoning behind the judges’ rulings.
The author eventually got to the meat of the article, alleging the court is a pro-Trump institution, and complaining about conservatives requesting it step in and rule on the recent Trump guilty verdict in New York City.
Trump recently called on the court to take action, writing on Truth Social, “The United States Supreme Court MUST DECIDE!”
Media outlets ran stories claiming Trump “begs” SCOTUS after he posted the message, hinting the establishment is afraid the court WILL side with the ex-president.
Ending the article with an extreme amount of unwarranted fearmongering, Perez told readers a second Trump administration would result in “rolling back reproductive rights, civil rights, and environmental regulations” in addition to “punishing” his enemies.
Meanwhile, the entire political establishment is trying to jail the presidential frontrunner and the Biden administration has imprisoned hundreds of Trump supporters in connection with Jan. 6th.
It’s clear the ruling class is terrified of being exposed and held accountable for the litany of crimes perpetrated against the American people.
Watch: CA Sheriff ‘Tired’ of Dems Jailbreaking Criminals Declares He’s Voting Trump
The sheriff of a California county is splitting with his state’s predominant political party and says he’ll vote for Republican Donald Trump in November, slamming Democrat bail reform policies letting criminals out of jail.
In an Instagram post over the weekend, Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco blasted the catch-and-release of criminals leading to them being recycled back into neighborhoods, effectively countering his efforts to keep communities safe.
We need more Sheriff Bianco’s in our country! Dude speaks truth! pic.twitter.com/OYRDHSPvoL
— Gunther Eagleman™ (@GuntherEagleman) June 1, 2024
Bianco said he’s “getting tired” of the lax crime policies and decided he’s “gonna change teams,” going on to ask others to join him.
“I think it’s time that, instead of letting them out of jail and giving them alcohol and drugs and everything else, I think it’s time we put a felon in the White House,” Sheriff Bianco said, adding, “Trump 2024, baby. Let’s save this country and make America great again.”
Read a transcript of Sheriff Bianco’s post below:
Hello, California Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco. You know for the past 30 years, I’ve been doing everything I could to keep our community safe by arresting criminals and putting them in jail and putting them in prison, keeping them out of our neighborhoods for the last five years. I’ve been very critical about our governor for slashing our budgets from corrections, for letting prisoners out early, for closing our prisons. I’ve been critical of our state legislature for passing laws to make it harder to put people in prison. I’ve been critical for their changing laws that let prisoners out early, and I’ve been critical for our attorney general for seemingly not caring about crime and really being an embarrassment to law enforcement.
And this love affair that our governor and our state legislature have with criminals is based on the belief that criminals are not responsible for their own actions. They’re victim of society and really it’s…it’s our fault. It’s society’s fault. It’s businesses’ fault. It’s cops fault. It might be my fault. Law enforcement, apparently if you listen to our governor, is systemically racist. If you listen to our legislature, our laws are systemically racist, our judicial system is systemically racist. All of these people that are being put in jail, or because of law enforcement bias, and DA bias, and all of these things. And so they let them out, they give them food. They give them housing. They give them money, they give them drugs and alcohol now.
And, I got to be honest, I’m getting tired. I’m getting tired and I’m wondering if I’m having a change of heart and deciding that, ‘You know what? Maybe I’ve been wrong.’
And I think I’m gonna change teams. I know it’s gonna make some of you angry. I know that you’re gonna be mad at me, but I’m gonna change teams. I think they’re onto something, but I don’t think they’re doing enough. I think that we need to go big. You know me, go big or go home. You’re the biggest, you do the best. You’re the best at everything, and you might as well do something right if you’re gonna do it. And I’m all in. And I hope that you’re all with me. I hope that you all have this change of heart. You all feel that this is definitely the right thing to do, and you come alongside me in this venture. And I think it’s time that, instead of letting them out of jail and giving them alcohol and drugs and everything else, I think it’s time we put a felon in the White House. Trump 2024, baby. Let’s save this country and make America great again.
The nation definitely needs more Trump-supporting sheriffs and law enforcement officials across the country to take a cue from Sheriff Bianco!
WEF Unveils Mandatory ‘Brain Implants’ to Eradicate Conspiracy Theories
Not content with euthanizing your grandparents, pumping mRNA into the food supply to alter your DNA, normalizing pedophilia, and riddling the population with turbo cancer via Bill Gates’ synthetic meat products, the globalist elite are […]
The post WEF Unveils Mandatory ‘Brain Implants’ to Eradicate Conspiracy Theories appeared first on The People’s Voice.
Ron Paul: The Trump Trial and Our Injustice System
I’ve long criticized our current US justice system – on all levels – as becoming much more about political justice than blind justice. The bizarre trial and conviction of former President Donald Trump last week on 34 felonies only reinforces my concerns.
The New York District Attorney, Soros-backed Alvin Bragg, has been notorious for downgrading felony charges against others to misdemeanor charges. According to a recent article in the Daily Mail, Bragg had downgraded 60 percent of felony cases to lesser charges, resulting in violent criminals being released on the streets and a crime wave across New York City.
But when it came to Donald Trump, Bragg lurched in the other direction, upgrading what normally would have been misdemeanor charges against anyone else to 34 felony charges against the former president. How can this sudden “about-face” be explained other than politics?
Jonathan Turley, who is no fan of Donald Trump, has been covering the trial closely and has found more than a little disturbing the exuberant celebrations of Trump’s conviction among the mainstream media and his political opponents. Recently, he wrote:
“The conviction of former President Donald Trump in Manhattan of 34 felonies produced citywide celebrations [which] extended to the media, where former U.S. Attorney Harry Litman told MSNBC’s Nicolle Wallace that it was ‘majestic day’ and ‘a day to celebrate.’ When I left the courthouse after watching the verdict come in, I was floored by the celebrations outside by both the public and some of the media.”
Regardless of one’s view of Donald Trump, it is a disturbing development in our society when justice is treated more like a football game where you root for your “team” rather than a way of preserving our freedom and liberty in an equal way for all.
The real goal of the trial was political. None other than George Soros’ son Alex let the cat out of the bag recently when he advised fellow Trump-haters how to take advantage of the trial result. He posted on Twitter after the verdict, “Democrats should refer to Trump as a convicted felon at every opportunity. Repetition is the key to a successful message and we want people to wrestle with the notion of hiring a convicted felon for the most important job in the country!”
It was not about justice in any way. It was all about being able to call the likely Republican presidential nominee a “felon” so as to undermine his support among voters. In other words, election interference.
The market has a way of prevailing, however. The repeated attempts at using “lawfare” to remove Trump from the political scene have all backfired and actually have served to make the former president even more popular among voters. Immediately after Trump’s conviction on the 34 charges he began sending out fundraising appeals based on his “persecution” by the state of New York. As of this writing, he has, according to press reports, raised over $200 million for his campaign.
The politicization of justice is not limited to the Democratic Party. The wind sown by political opponents of Donald Trump may well become the whirlwind they reap when their own political opponents are in positions of power. When that is the case, we all lose.
This article first appeared at RonPaulInstitute.org.